03/07/2014 The Papers

quarterfinals. We will have news of a big name sacking and rugby league,

and they will have an update on Tyson day.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers

With me are Randeep Ramesh, Social Affairs Editor for the Guardian

The front page of the Metro shows a picture of a con man who has been

jailed for eight years because of a lottery scam. Large sections of the

relevant work will be brought back into political ownership.

Holiday`makers could be subject to long delays because of the latest

terror threat according to the telegraph. The main picture on the

Daily Mail is of a Canadian tennis player celebrating winning her

Wimbledon semifinal. Let's begin. We start with the Guardian. Not showing

any preferential treatment. The headline is, plan for competitive

bids with private sector when contracts come up for renewal. It is

not an automatic assumption that any section will fall back into the

hands of the state, but they are going to have a look and see what

the best option would be. Ed Miliband raised this earlier on when

he took over leadership of the Labour Party by saying that it was

absurd that other European state owned railways owed bits of our

railway, and I think he was referring to the Dutch railway

making rockets of the British and seamers, so it has been a theme.

This worker making profits off the British's trains. Who is going to

bid for these things? It will cost the public purse quite a bit of

money to do so. The actual bidding process can cost you ever it is,

weather it is the state or private companies, between ?5 million in ?10

million just to bed. If the government were to bid for all of

them, a lot of money might go down the drain. I have sympathy with Ed

Miliband's point about it being galling that foreign private

companies who are owned by foreign governments are making a lot of

money out of successful British Railways. We pay for expensive

tickets and it is lining the pockets of foreign governments. We all were

member that fiasco just two years ago when the government completely

messed up and got the sums wrong and had to go groveling back to Richard

Branson and apologise and there were expensive legal fees. They could not

possibly do any worse than they did, and also, since that one particular

line, the East Coast Main line was taken back, and that has actually

been very successful, and that is now washing its face quite

respectively. You can see the attraction. I can't help but feel

there is a bit of mischiefmaking. In a week when Labour was repositioning

itself as friendly to business, you get a story about nationalizing the

railways. There seems to be some internal politics. This is not an

authorised leak, this is someone saying there will be an announcement

and the party said this is pure speculation. He get the feel of a

family insider... Someone sticking their finger out to see which way

the wind is blowing. It has residents. It says in the article

that it would have to provide a fair deal to the taxpayer and not amount

to a return to purchase rail, because it is easy to forget how

much people complained when we have nationalised rail. The service was

terrible and as days best record in those days. Growth in population and

to assure acro in those days. The amount of passengers will grow in

the next 20 and 30 years, and there is a lot of money to be made there

all stop although, the railways of yesteryear were nothing to shout

about, as anyone who travelled on them will tell you. Especially the

sandwiches! Another look at what could be a Labour policy. Not yet

formulated yet, just another admission by Labour all stop Europe

is a big hurdle for they brought `` for Labour. It is about confidence

in immigration. Labour have been apologizing for getting a lot wrong

and that seems more in that vein. Sorry is the easiest word in a lot

of ways. These are comments that were made at a progress group

meeting about a month ago, so I am guessing that he did not imagine

that they would end up on the front page of the telegraph. It clearly

must have been off the back of the local elections. He talks about

being on the doorstep. What was the big issue at local elections?

Immigration. He is saying that it is not clear that their policy and

immigration in Europe is not clear to the voters come and it has to be

the right edition, but he does not seem to go any further than that. He

is putting some blame at the door of Ed Miliband, and he cannot predict

any other way. If it is not clear, who is it that is muddying the

issue? Labour have a problem over Europe. They do not have a position.

They would probably like to be pro`European but they saw the

demolition job that happened to Nick Clegg and probably do not want to go

there. Internally, there was a battle between Douglas Alexander and

Ed balls and that which is why we have Labour having a position on it.

It seems as if there is a pitch partially being made to the

post`2015 world of Europe being an important issue and part of a

referendum and saying, I am missing a trick here, which seems a little

inside Westminster. Is it a little bit of criticism towards Ed Miliband

and a suggestion that maybe Andy Burnham might like to be the leader

one day? Possibly. As you were saying, he probably never thought

these things would come to light. It certainly looks like a bit of

jockeying, doesn't it? Let's move onto the express. The madman plots

to up jets with invisible explosives. This is the story we

have been talking about all day, the heightened the sense that something

is afoot, the involving, credible threat, is what we are being told,

and although nothing seems to have disrupted travellers to my there is

apparently extra vigilance at the moment, but this suggests that there

is one particular person. They have been trying to find one particular

person for many years. He has been the number one target of the CIA for

many years, and he has been reportedly killed many times, by

drone attacks, firefights, his DNA has been checked and it was not

him, so they have been actively been hunting him down. He is supposed to

be the top bomb maker. Interestingly, a couple of years

ago, we are being told that he was creating internal bombs, so suicide

bombers would have bombs somehow inside their bodies, and that is why

they were such a threat. The other things it seems to be laptops,

airports doubletalk and laptops and making people... We all know that

you have to put them in a plastic box and everyone has to turn them on

and off, and you can see that there's going to be very

time`consuming as they go into the summer period. The `` that is going

to be. And very frightening. Depending on who you are travelling

with and where you are going, the checks are so variable. You can

almost swan through without much happening. And with other airlines,

they really hold you up. We will find ourselves at Heathrow being

held up the summer, I am convinced. Particularly if you are flying to

the United States. Anywhere across the Atlantic. Having said that,

there is this thing about perception here. This guy has been around for

quite some time. He has been trying to blow up people in various ways

for quite some time. He has been trying to blow up people in various

ways for quite sometime. I'd think he had a go at the Saudi 's not too

long ago with a surgically implanted bomb. He made his own brother a

suicide bomb. Which blew him up. I don't know quite what the reality

is, for the advice to change. If Washington asks for your help, I do

not suppose London will say no to stop it is causing a lot of the

structure. `` will say no. They would not just do it on a whim. This

is a game that people are familiar with. We know he is a `` name that

people are familiar with. We know he is a threat. A lot of commentators

have said that it is all very well, but it is the intelligence that

counts, the people that they are tracking, not the devices that they

are trying to intercept, and we have to trust that post`9/11 that has

improved, because there was a period after the Cold War where the CIA had

about six people who spoke Arabic, and that is where they needed the

intelligence, said that is what we are depending on. That brings us

back to the very difficult areas that we have been treading through

the last couple of years of phone interceptions, the use of drones and

all of those things which should prevent people like this, but can

often be scattered. Hindsight is a valuable tool with these things. You

learn your lessons after they have happened. I think they have tied it

in... The reason I've mentioned perception is, it seemed Elizabeth

convenient with ISIS .org are a little bit convenient with ISIS ``

it seemed a little bit convenient with ISIS, to talk about these

measures. An unknown unknown as someone once said. More children are

being bullied on the playground according to a survey into

cyberbullying. The author of the report has found that 12% of young

people questioned have been the target of cyberbullying compared

with 9% who have been picked on face to face. It is so easy with children

having access to the internet. It is so easy and things are changing so

quickly. For any of us who are parents, the pace of change is

difficult to keep up with. The same survey was done in 2010, and the

figures have completely changed. It was up 16% back then he'll ported

being bullied face to face `` who reported being bullied face to face

and only 8% online. The picture has changed. My children are eight and

six and do not have their own accounts, but they were are well

aware, and fronts of theirs have Instagram and things, and I'd can

see it all starting, they want to have their own e`mail and they want

to be talking to their fronts, and it terrifies me. You have to be

completely aware as a parent of what sites they are using and to know

when it is becoming a problem. You can imagine teachers having to trawl

this pretty soon, because the leading is an Ofsted issue, so

cyberbullying is just a year or two away, if `` if this poll is to be

believed. The spread of these devices, how cheap they have

become, it it is kind of a nightmare a personal worst possibility. A

depressing salary, a woman salary peaks at 34 but a man's salary will

rise until he's 50. Over 40 years since the equal pay act was brought

in. None of my friends and after having children what they did before

having children. We tried to go full`time and we fail. Therefore we

take a reduction in salary. Some of us are lucky to be able to afford to

do that. For most women it does present real hardship and worry.

When you're at home you worry about not being at work and when you're at

work you worry about not being at home. We are both waiting to reach

our peak but it's one of those issues that doesn't seem to be

getting any better. No government policy seems to be able to fix the

problem. What's the issue, is transparency? It's about childcare.

My partner is a far better journalist then IM and she's doing

the bulk of childcare. Women's and men's salary is the same until the

age of 30. It's when you have children. Lots of statistics show

that women can earn more when they are more junior. They tend to be

paid more on merit. As you get older you start asking for pay rises and

women don't tend to do it. So we can't have it all. Who would have

thought it? We will be back at a slightly earlier time, 1125. Stay

with us. We will have a look at the dangers facing the UK's borders. Now

we've got the sports. Hello and welcome to sports day. The

headlines: The 20`year`old Bouchard reaches a Wimbledon final. Welcome

to Yorkshire. The Tour de France prepares