25/09/2014 The Papers

league Castleford tigers hosted Warrington Wolves tonight. The best

of it in Sportsday in 15 minutes after the papers. Welcome to our

look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With us is

broadcaster David Davies and Anne Ashworth, assistant editor of the

Times. Tomorrow's front pages. The Guardian leads with the vote in the

Commons tomorrow on whether the UK should join air strikes in I The

Daily Telegraph says the FBI knows the identity of "Jihadi John," who

murdered a British aid workers and two Ameri journalis The Express

claim as spicy diet could hold the key to beating Alzheimer's. Let's

begin with the recall of Parliament and this vote tomorrow on air

strikes by Britain on Iraq. We begin with the Guardian's take on this.

RAF jets ready to attack within 4 hours of the vote but Guardian's

take on this. RAF jets ready to attack within 4 hours of the vote

but not within Syria `` within 24 hours of the vote but not within

Syria. It is a very serious and momentous evening. We had a month

where it feels that all the news is very serious. Only a week ago we

were looking forward to the vote on the future of the United Kingdom and

now we are poised to go, start military action in Iraq. But there's

nothing gung`ho about the statement that they are going to debate for as

long as seven hours in Parliament tomorrow. We don't know quite what

the aims are but it seems it will be limited action. What the aims are it

is not clear there. Has been criticism of that. Somewhere in this

piece it says there's no identifiable or achievable aims of

this action, but there is all party support now, won by a careful

campaign for this. Lift be a very interesting debate in Parliament

tomorrow. In the past, David, there's been concern about the

legality of action like this, but this is at the request of Iraq, so

they think they are on safe ground. Absolutely. This story in the

Guardian says the Cabinet handed clear advice from the Attorney

General justifying the war's legality, it says. But just to

reflect the point that Anne is making, the first sentence of the

story, wary British MPs are expected today. The contrast is painted with

last year's vote on getting involved in fighting Assad in Syria. When the

Prime Minister surprisingly lost that vote. You've had during the day

here on the BBC News Channel General Sir Michael Jackson, the former

Chief of Staff, saying what is the long`term plan? But the answer to

that question of course is, what is the alternative to what we are

doing? Sit seriously nothing? If it is to push Islamic State back out of

Iraq, doesn't that just park the problem in Syria? This will be in

combination with the coalition action in Syria which is taking out

the oil installations, a vital source of receive knew for ISIS. S

taking out the oil installations, a vital source of receive knew for

ISIS `` revenue for ISIS. If they can knock out many of those

installations maybe it won't be so great to work for ISIS, which

essentially is like a multinational crime corporation. People are paid

handsomely. They are paid very well. Jordan has been complaining how well

people have been paid to fight for ISIS a. We've got to hope that the

action in Syria and Iraq work in tandem. We know it is going to last

a long time. Michael Fallon has been warning today, years. Two to three

years he suggested. But the solution to this lies in the region. The fact

this is a multinational force. Perhaps some surprising countries

involved in it up to this point. Who knows who else might come in as we

go along. The transformation down there and the way that Iran now is

so involved in what is the ultimate outcome of this, it is fascinating.

Some extraordinary allegiances you would never have dreamt of. O Met's

move to the Metro. Terror alert on New York and Paris Subways. The

White House is playing this down very much, but news of this came

from the Prime Minister of Iraq, because they believe they've got

this intelligence from captured Islamic State extremists, who say

that a strike was planned. We don't know how imminent though. It is all

quite vague, but the premier of Iraq has thought it worth mentioning. I

suppose this strengths the case for action. A lot of things are coming

together to support the vote tomorrow. On action in Parliament.

But it isn't just people in Iraq who are suffering the most appalling

way. Paris, London and... Obvious targets. You would think so. I think

people will be scared by this sort of stuff, which isn't a reason, I'm

not suggesting that people if this information exists, that people

should not be alerted to it. But I think most people recognise the

threat very clearly. But it isn't just a local threat in reaction it

has international consequences for us as well. Let's look at the

Telegraph, another strand to this story. We know the true identity of

"Jihadi John," claims the FBI, but they are not telling us. They are

not, but there is in the middle of this story, I mentioned earlier

General Sir Mike Jackson, the former Chief of the General Staff. Here we

have Air Chief Marshal Sir Michael Graydon, a former head of the RAF,

warning that Britain's Air Force will struggle to mount a sustained

campaign because it has been cut back to the bare bonus. He says the

RAF is at rock bottom after years of cuts. Let's be, as Britain

presumably now gets involved in all this action, and Michael Fallon

talked about two to three years, are we in a position to be involved for

two to three years? I'm sure people will be asking tomorrow in

Parliament, if there's a lack of combat aircraft, how long can we

sustain the campaign for? And it has to have diminishing returns. Once

you've taken out the obvious targets, what do you do next? We are

in uncharted territory here. Overshadowed by the fears and

concerns and the bad outcomes of previous conflicts. It is beyond me.

It is rather like it is simplistic but it makes the point, how do you

fight a part of a war? This all roads lead too Syria in this is

really what I'm saying. Is I suspect that tomorrow's vote in the House of

Commons will be followed in the not too distant future by another vote,

which extends this into Syria. But it has to be a separate vote. It is

quite a restricted motion. Which will be a relief to a lot of people

tomorrow having to make the decision. EU moves to block

buy`to`let mortgages, in the Express. Accidental landlords are

going to be hit. If you are renting a house I think that hearted from a

parent or you've both had a flat before you got married and you are

representing it out. Anybody who is a landlord, not as in a business but

as a reluctant or accidental landlord, nobody knows how many of

these there are, and how much they borrow, but they are going to find

it much more difficult in future to be able to get a mortgage. They are

going to have to undergo the same tough affordability checks that

other borrowers face. It seems we don't know how many there are.

Surely you would be able to Claridges I am a landlord as a

business rather than just by accident. It is a very strange piece

of EU legislation, of which this is the consequence. I can almost hear

Nigel Farage as we speak, saying what on earth has this got to do

with the EU? You might well ask that. It is an extraordinarily

bebuildering move, but whatever happens, we know that mortgages are

getting tougher to get. There are lots more questions asked of anybody

wanting to borrow, and currently buy to let loans are not covered by that

legislation. Is that not the responsibility of

the British Parliament? You know I cannot answer that! Let's go to the

business pages. Bank on brink of raising interest rates. This will

strike fear into the lot of people if they are lumbered with those

mortgages. Mortgages are likely to rise in the near future, nearer than

we might have thought. Is this not the biggest delayed drop story of

our lifetime? ! They had to dust it off. I rather like Mark Carney and

the job that he is doing in succession to Sir Mervyn King, who I

also thought was in excellent governor. We seem to be every week,

every month he says there are going to arrive dash`mac they are going to

rise. He is running around the still United Kingdom saying the same thing

that we have known for ages. Central need to be enigmatic and the like to

keep you guessing. We all know interest rates are going to go up.

He seems to suggest it might be sooner than we thought but the

increases will be limited and gradual. He is absolutely pledging

that. I do not think there is going to be a quick up words surge. It

will be small increases but everybody needs to be ready for

this. It is inevitable and it might happen early next year. But if they

are not ready, they are living on another planet because we have been

told for however long that it is going to be either side of

Christmas. People have become habituated to record low rates. It

has been going on for so long that people, I think, some people will be

shocked and other prudent people will not and I am sure you are

amongst them. We are the prudent people today! The Guardian, sorry, I

need to go back to the Guardian and a story about GB waiting times,

which are national disgrace according to the chair of the Royal

College of GPs. When she says so, you have to start worrying, don't

you? GPs say that they are trying to manage this problem as best they

can. Sobering statement because she said the biggest risk is that some

people don't get an appointment, call away and are better stop other

people have got a serious illness, the symptoms seem better and then

they did not go back again and that serious illness is not caught early

and that is the problem. If people are waiting for a week they give up

and think they don't feel that well but have to put up with it and then

present in Accident and Emergency with very serious conditions. That

is what is happening. We are always encouraged to take action sooner

rather than later for early diagnosis and early intervention. If

you cannot get an appointment, it is difficult. I have to wonder why the

proportion of patients waiting at least a week has gone from 13% in

2011, we are told, to 16% in July of this year. This pressure on the GP

surgeries which most of us see in our local communities month in month

out or however often you go to see your GPs, I still think that there

are a lot of people who are generally healthy who could have

telephone consultations who still prefer to pick up... I would prefer

to pick up the phone and go and see my GP but I think I do get it that

there are people who need to see their GP personally much more than I

do and I think a telephone consultation is perfectly

acceptable. It would save a lot of time. That is it from the moment but

there is a lot more to discuss. We will be back at 11:30pm for another

look at the stories making the front pages tomorrow. Up next, sports day.

The Ryder Cup captains have revealed their pairings

for the opening fourballs at Gleneagles, as the competition