12/02/2016 The Papers

Not showing any favouritism at all. I will start with The Times. 1

million stolen bank cards for sale. Proper journalism at work!

Apparently 100,000 Britons on this site, you can buy their details.

They went in and they found all the details. What is particularly

surprising is, this is not on the dark web, it is only normal

internet. It looks like a kind of consumer website. So, it is an

interesting thing, around ?27 billion a year is lost on this kind

of online fraud. It is an increasing problem. It is bad!

It is staggering how easy it is to do. A fantastic piece of journalism

by the Times. They went to the site which has a help desk. It seems to

be legitimate and typed in the details and got her debit card

number and security code and expiry date, everything you need to make

the payments online. I think people sitting round the breakfast table on

Saturday morning will be staggered how easy it is. People think it will

never happen to them. Everyone thinks it will never happen to them

until it does and you have to be careful about your password. This

investigation says that loads of people use their mother's maiden

name. We know that as one of the key questions that you ask and so, those

details are conveniently on the site. I think the lesson to all of

us, is use complicated passwords, don't use things which are obvious

and don't use things which people can find on social media like your

birth date on the names of your kids or the name of your cat. I did a

really interesting thing about fraud we went on a hacker course to become

hackers and it was very, very easy to hack into other people's stuff by

looking at their Facebook accounts. It is incredible what people find

out about you online. Let's look at The Telegraph. Health watchdog will

troll social media for anythingtive comments about hospitals.

Is this really what they need to do? People don't know how good their

local Health Services are. They have started to bring in rating systems

online, but it is based on a couple of reviews. So I think, it is

well-intentioned to try and get other bits of information out there

from people's Facebook and other ways, but the question people wonder

is, is that going to give you a great accurate picture? Do people go

on Facebook and moan about their local NHS service? Ben, you're

wrong. At the moment, there are Ofsted-style ratings and inspections

where people go into hospitals and have a look at it. They are cutting

the number of inspections, they are bringing it down by 25% and instead,

they're going to go and trawl social media to see if people are moaning

about things. This is a disguise for the fact that actually, the quality

Care Commission are cutting back on inspections spectacularly and in the

wake of Morcambe Bay that's something we should be worried about

and the Facebook thing is a gimmick! She can be quite forthright, but we

encourage that. I will humbly put forward the idea that going to

different data sources and what people are saying outside the

official inspectorate whenever he does up their ties isn't a bad thing

even if it is not done properly. A 25% cut in the inspections is not

good. They have got to bridge that gap in some way. Facebook won't

help. Shall we look at the FT? Cameron dilutes sugar tax plan with

levy threat if food producers fail to act. We have been waiting forever

to have this obesity strategy published and whether or not there

will be a sugar tax of any sort? Jamie Oliver writing in the Sunday

Times last week which has been re-launched on Sunday, he wrote

about and he was on the BBC and Andrew Marr talking about how he was

going to go Ninja and he was furious that he thought that Cameron was

backing out of the sugar tax and what the FT is telling us tomorrow,

implies that's the case. He is going to make them, he says, Coca-Cola

will make a modest cut to the sugar content of their product. Oh well

done! Is there a better way to go, to go voluntarily and you take them

with you? The idea that Cameron is ditching the idea that he backed

previously is misleading because he was always against a sugar tax. He

said, "I am against taxation as a Tory." He said a month ago, I will

consider it, but he is always one for trying to use this as a way to

strong arm companies to do these measures. What you mean Ben is

Eleanor you are wrong. I think you're right that Cameron is trying

to wriggle out of this. We have got a massive obesity problem. One in

three children are obese. There is a massive problem with fizzy drinks

and sugary snackses a parent I really want something to be done

about this. They have done it with salt. They have reduced the amount

of salt in products, but a big stick saying if you don't do this in a

serious way, we will come after you. There is a tussle about whether the

Government should hammer advertisers for advertising during any time

before 9pm or not. The Culture Secretary is one side and the Health

Secretary is on another. It is worth watching that. I thought we hadn't

much time, but I think we're OK. Daily Mail, police, "We won't name

fugitives. Suspected killers and rapists are on the run." You guess

it is because of Human Rights? It sends alarm bells flashing in The

Daily Mail hall. It will infuriate families across the country if they

think their children, their relatives are at a threat from

people who the police are refusing to name. They do name and put out

the photos when dangerous people are on the loose, clearly some suspects

are named. This is to say they won't release the name of people because

of data protection, it is classic Daily Mail because Data Protection

Act send them into a frenzy. The police have sometimes used data

protection and maybe they have been wrong. They asked for freedom

information requests from 45 police forces asking who is on your wanted

list? This is rapist, murderers and 21 forces said they wouldn't release

the details on the grounds of data protection and the privacy grounds

in the Human Rights Act. People might not always like this, but even

criminals have Human Rights. Well, people are meant to be considered

innocent until proven guilty. But even when they are in prison, they

still have Human Rights? They do, Martine. I'm making the point,

people may not like it. It is your children who are possibly at risk.

Good Telegraph point! Lets look at the Independent. A sad

day. While we can. RIP. No more dead tree edition. Well, we can still

feature the front page even when you go online. Will you? Remorseless

Assad vows re-take Syria? There are so many different people at play. It

is impossible to see how they can get around the table. You have

western forces, Isil and Assad. If he is not and Russians, obviously,

if he is not playing ball with the peace process, it is impossible to

see how they can come to any kind of settlement and it is hours before

the rest of the guys were saying, "OK, we're ready to hold fire. He is

saying, I'll do whatever it takes: " At lunch time, they said the masses

of nations were saying, there was going to be a ceasefire and Assad

goes, "It makes no sense for us to give up any part of Syria. We want

the whole lot backment we will take a long time. We will incur a heavy

price." Anyone who thinks there is a solution in Syria any time soon is

barking up the wrong tree. But it seems that maybe the Americans said

to President Putin, you know, we'll resort to Plan B and things will get

tougher if you don't agree to the seization, there could be all things

going around behind the scenes? The fact that Assad said this, in

vehement terms, it doesn't look good for the ceasefire. He invited

journalists into the palace to brief them on this. They have got Islamic

State to deal with. Who weren't part of the plan. Staying with the

Independent while we have got you here. Calais refugees terrorised by

armed far-right militia. People being hand clufd and stripped naked.

These people couldn't be anymore vulnerable before these reports.

They have left their homes. Children, orphaned, you cannot

imagine anymore vulnerable people. It is horrific to see and it is

common. They have got ten different testimonies being reported. This

does seem like it is a proper problem. It is vague this report

about exactly who the far-right fa Englishias are. It says they are

being taken off and awful things are happening to them. It is

unsatisfying for me that they haven't got enough detail on who is

doing it. They seem to be a sitting target. If you think of the stoking

of the far-right going on in France and Europe, it is not too surprising

that the Calais Jungle has become a magnet for the vigilantes or people

who are anti-migrant and I think it is really sad. Poor people. It comes

on the back of the week that David Cameron warned this is what is going

to come to Britain if we go for Brexit, that was the front page of

the Telegraph on Monday. But we don't believe that for a second.

David Cameron is claiming it, whether we believe it or not. It is

widely discredited. But the PM is sticking to his line.

It is sad about the Independent. Let's talk about the Independent and

the I because we know that the Independent and the Independent on

Sunday going online. The I has a different fate ahead of it, I think.

The reports it will be sold and some people from the Independent will go

on supplying copy to it. The I sells 270,000 copies which is a lot. The

Independent, which is only 50 pence, the Independent, only sells between

30 and 50,000, that's why it is going online, but what I don't

understand is how they are going to keep up a full newspaper staff to

keep it online when they haven't got any online advertising and there is

a problem hitting many newspaper groups at the moment and the

Guardian said they had big losses and the big online experiment isn't

working. We had a pay war so we make money from our subscribers on our

pay wall, but no one has really cracked this. There is a massive

slump in advertising across the press is hitting everyone, but there

are different ways around this, and at News UK, we are investing heavily

in the newspapers. We are just about to re-launch a magazine. There is

money and investment going into the titles and that's the opposite.

Here on the I, it says free from party political bias and five years

young. How long that will continue on who decides to buy it? There are

two things that are going to be in the midst. It is free and impartial

compared to some of the papers, but it won't have the same impact online

as it will in newspapers around Westminster all the MPs read the

front pages and the second one is the staff, not all of them are going

to be able to stay Let's hope they find a way to stay. We will keep

looking at what you're doing on the Papers. We look at buzz feed. That's

it from the papers this hour. Ben survived! He will be back with

Eleanor at 11.30pm. You can cope with us, you can cope

with anything. Coming up next, it is Sportsday.