19/05/2016 The Papers

Welcome to look ahead to what the papers will be bringing tomorrow.

Welcome back both of you. The front pages, the EgyptAir flight seeing

the terrorist attack is the most likely cause. The Telegraph says a

fool privacy law has been created after the Supreme Court ruled an

injunction with the married celebrity can stand. The metal beads

with the report of Britain Richard Osman who is feared to have died in

the plane crash. The Guardian says 100 new child sex abuse cases are

being referred to the police every month. Fears over aviation safety in

the wake of the EgyptAir disaster. And the times charts the final

movements of the flight. And the FT leads with the German

company Bayer making a takeover bid for the agricultural company

Monsanto. And let's begin with how the times

are reporting this plane crash because a very shocking headline,

passengers spinning to their deaths. Terrorists suspected. And then it

talks about this strange manoeuvre that the plane seems to make. This

is a really horrific story. You don't want to jump to premature

conclusions but like lots of people are now seeing, it looks like it

possibly could have been mechanical but the likelihood is a terrorist

problem, more likely. Incredibly distressing, 66 people on board and

the thing I think people will be looking at is the fact that Egypt's

has had already issues with security, there was a plane and the

issue of a man directing a flight which eventually led to Cyprus but

it was from Egypt. There are one issues about security in Egypt and

the US use and I think one of the worries is that Egypt is a country

that really relies on to those and that will be draining away,

something that you only will make it more susceptible to terrorist

attacks. The whole thing is deeply worrying. You wonder why they stuck

their necks out and said it was a terrorist attack when Elliott and

the day they seems to have found some wreckage and others said they

haven't. It is upsetting as it is for family and friends? At this

point nobody knows and as far as we can tell there is a plane in the sea

but you interviewed an expert and he said earlier on, how do you tell if

a particular piece of wreckage that you find in the sea is from the

plane which has disappeared today or from another plane or something else

completely. It was the Egyptian Minister who was giving a press

conference this afternoon saying we think it is probably a terror attack

rather than mechanical failure at this point. Presumably he is basing

that on some kind of expertise. Maybe mechanical failure would mean

communication... They don't want to look like they are somehow

complacent in terms of trying to suppress the fact it is a terrorist

attack. All the early evidence is pointing to that and the air that

the stage where they don't want to look as if they are covering it up.

Let's look at the Guardian. Huge scale of child sex abuse shocks

police. 100 new cases every month referred for investigation. In

Australia when they have this commission, they had so many people

come forward and it looks like it could be the same here. The police

officer in charge predicts that by 2020 the police will be

investigating 200,000 cases of historic child sex abuse. It makes

you wonder that the police will have time to do anything else by that

time, especially given cuts and police budgets. This enquiry is a

statutory enquiry with power to bring witnesses. It is a big deal.

Obviously a couple of false starts when British cheer people resigned

because they felt they were close to institutions and individuals who

might be being investigated. We now have Zealander in charge and it

seems to be full throttle. What this is highlighting is that for decades

we had a culture of victims, particularly young victims, not

being believed and so not coming forward. What we are going to have

to see is a big cultural shift in terms of... It has been happening in

terms of how the police deal with these cases and how the criminal

justice system deals with these cases but quite often, it has been

somebody any position of authority and power and normally a young

person who has been unclear or who is vulnerable, there has been a lot

of power play, but the classic feature has been the victim not

being believed and that will have to be a big cultural shift. And it

would imply people feel more confident about coming forward. The

Daily Telegraph, judges create UK privacy law. This is the Supreme

Court upholding an injunction against a celebrity. Here we have a

ruling from these judges that the injunction should stand which is not

what the newspaper wanted. Why does that it to the creation of a law?

Because the Supreme Court, and the clue is in the name, what they say

is law until another Supreme Court decision or parliamentary decision,

an act of Parliament overrules it, so once these judges have spoken,

the word is law and what it said in the leading judgment today was that

the privacy of the individual should trump... They are two writes in the

European rights Convention which are competing, the right to freedom of

expression in the right to privacy and family law. The judge said that

the right to privacy is trumps the right to freedom of expression

unless there is a public office which can't be properly taken out,

somebody in the public eye who can do their job properly because of

what is going on because of their private life, or if they have

created a misconception in the public mind about their private

life. Some people might say that getting married, as this coupled

dead, creates an impression on the public mind that they will be

faithful to each other. But privacy and the right to a family life, who

is to codify what shapes that family life because people do all sorts of

things. I think personally society has moved on and we are not that

interested in these kinds of stories. Newspapers sell as a result

of it. I think what is interesting is whether UK politicians will want

to change their sense that you because we had a huge brouhaha over

leathers and a couple of years ago. One of the things that came out of

that was the working to keep this type of law away from statute and

Parliament, so it will be interesting to see whether they be

asked to go back and amend that because you could open it up to

other press regulation coming in and that would open up a row. The other

thing that is significant is this only applies in England and Wales

and in Scotland, for example, the original injunction and it doesn't

apply so anyone can find out. And that is one of the great

distinctions in the sense you have broadcasters, newspapers playing by

the rules, but then there is jurisdiction beyond that in terms of

digital, and that is where the law is very difficult to enforce and

privacy. We could talk about this longer but we must move on. Let's go

back to the times, the Shadow Minister for Europe called a voter

racist and she has had to come out very quickly with an apology. I

can't personally explain why. I think there are two rules of

politics at the moment, don't talk about Hitler and adored Colville

says Rhesus. That is quite basic. -- don't call voters racist. These are

the two camps and it will get heated and ugly in the remaining weeks. The

The main campaign are focusing on jobs and growth and the economy.

People are focusing on the economy and it is really ramping up. Pat

Glass has been caught out, the resource such thing as off the

record if you are politician and Gordon Byron famously learned that.

-- Gordon Brown. Emily Thornberry lost her position in the shadow can

do it because of the treat. We have to be able to have sensible

discussion about immigration without it either feeling into dog whistle

racism but at the same time not dismissing fears about racism. The

person she spoke to said was a horrible racist and never wanted

comeback. She said she was talking about a particular family, not

immigrants entirely. This voter was talking and apparently about a local

family believes to be on benefits. As if that is some kind of crime in

and of itself. I think it is interesting, this is the third time

that a prominent Labour politician has been caught out effectively

smearing at the voters that the support to be representing. They

seemed to be sneering at the house with a flag of St George when

campaigning against Ukip, Gordon Brown with the bigoted woman, and

now Pat Glass, and the Labour Party in particular need to use the

phrase, get a grip, on how... Can I say in hard defence, I don't think

anyone can question how working-class background is. But

just to put that in another perspective, I spoke two days ago to

Nigel Farage, a perfectly reasonable debate, and he took it into an early

on immigration which had a nasty racial undertone, so both sides have

got to be quite careful. He isn't here to explain what he meant so I

will move on. The Guardian, a group of celebrities on the front page,

most of them actors and actresses, or they are all actors. Vivian

Westwood and Hillary Mantell, why are they on the only front-page?

They have written a letter to the Daily Telegraph in favour of

remaining in the European Union and as the Telegraph front-page's story

points out, that might not have the effect that they want it to have,

because the views of so-called luvvies may have great currency in

Metropolitan London but out in the real world, the places Pat Glass is

going back to, wherever they are, people can be quite contrary about

being told what to do by people with lots of money. Or might they look at

these people and say they trust them as much as a politician. You have

people like Ian Botham coming out, but the serious business case and

the creative industries in this country are doing really well in

Britain and they rely on that and do well around the world but

particularly the European market, so I think Bill is probably a business

case they are alluding to. Most of the cultural traffic economically as

transatlantic. Finally, back to the Muirfield when in's members ban.

This is the golf club that has said that the carry on insisting they

will not let women become members, they can just be guests visitors and

now Peter Alice has agreed with them! It is depressing and they need

to move on. -- Peter Alliss. You have a situation with a female First

Minister and the reason they give is the said women golfers play too

slowly and with the room lunch. Come on! That was the rationale from the

club. I think Peter Alliss has said... Insisting they would never

want to pay the fees anyway, these women! These women! I love it! My

view on this simple, it is a private club and that its members want to

keep women out, just as if a female club wanted to keep men out, that is

their right. It is not a decision agree with, it is a decision I

object to, but that is the right, and if then the nation wants to take

the open away from them that is the thing to do. And that is the right

thing to do. As Sinead O'Connor said, I do not want what I cannot

have. That is the papers for tonight, can we roll up the autocue?

Thank you. The pages are all online and you can see them on the website.

Goodbye. You can also watch us because tonight's edition is on that

page also and also on I player. Coming up next. The weather.

Good evening. The weather has been unsettled over the last few days

with fluctuation in the temperature around rain at times. Some heavy

thunderstorms to end the day in Belfast and once the year