23/10/2016 The Papers


A lively, informed and in-depth conversation about the Sunday papers.

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 23/10/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!



pursuit quartet in Rio. Congratulations to hurt them.


Now on BBC News here's Gavin Esler with The Papers


Hello and welcome to our look at The Papers. Let's have a look at the


front pages. The Observer leads and the claim by the British bankers


Association that some of the UK's biggest banks are preparing to be


located outside the UK next year overpacked -- Praxiteles.


The Times also mentions Calais and refugee arrivals,


but their main story is an account from reporter Louise Callaghan


of the Iraqi mission to liberate the city of Mosul


The situation in Calais also dominates the Telegraph's front


page, but the paper focuses on claims that the Home Office


ignored warnings about the issues - such as age checks -


And the Express claims to have an exclusive on its front


page, a row between Prince Charles and Prince Andrew over the official


roles of Andrew's daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.


Leading banks set to pull out of the UK early next year overpacked said.


City chiefs are poised to hit the relocated button. Is this Project we


are again or somehow project fact when it happens? It is probably a


bit of both. He is saying, rather graphically, that some banks are


offering their fingers over the relocated button and are thinking of


going. They would say that. They are lobbying for their own interests. We


have heard this before from the banks. There have been reports of


the 70,000 jobs could go. There is a fundamental truth which is that the


banks like being in London. While there is talk of them being lured to


Paris or Frankfurt, bankers enjoy living in London. His lobbyist for


banks lobbying for bikers. Bikers also like Monday -- like money and


if they thought they had a better chance in France, the France -- the


French were trying to lure them to Paris with little adverts. I think


they will go where they think they make the biggest profits and they


can afford to let up on these leases in London which are overpriced


anyway. Restaurants are better in Britain than in France, anyway.


Paris isn't as interesting in as many ways. It is thanks to the


bankers that we have such fantastic food in London and all these things


because they have pumped money through London for 20 years. They


ordered the most sympathetic lobby group after 2008. They have become


literally pantomime villains. With some justification. The problem is


as an economy we are over relied on the financial sector, so this is


part of the intense lobbying campaign with the government. It is


special pleading if you like, but it is pleading the government cannot


ignore because they are important to the economy. The Observer also have


this. 50 refugee girls arrive after U-turns by officials. They also have


Kerry Mulligan clutching a toy bear. What do you make of this story and


the way in which some people who are celebrities, Lily Allen as well,


have come out and talked about this? I am not sure what the use of


celebrities does except to make people more cross. As a woman, it is


lovely to see girl children being brought in because one of the


biggest problems for all people deal with the refugee crisis is that all


we see is young men. To most of this, even when we see our


home-grown young men standing on the corners in groups all we see is a


trouble. The idea we will bring in even more young men who stand on


street corners and get cross with each other is pretty terrifying to


people. It is very important to be reminded that there are girls there


and young women there because we see them possibly as an integrated


future. They tended to be invisible in much of the coverage. When the


young men came in, there were a lot of photographs. I am not sure why


that is. Are we protecting them from traffickers or whatever. We seem to


treat women differently and we are not sing enough girls and women. The


Observer coverage is about the young girls and the pictures that have


been around, they are very young. The journey between 13 and 17. There


is a problem of perception because the first draft of people coming in


looked of dubious age. There were warnings from border officials that


many migrants were posing as children to get into the country


when they were substantially older. There is good coverage around the


fact that the latest group of refugees are girls. It is


unfortunate that are in the second set of arrivals, rather than the


first. Even the Brexit problems are that you are only seeing male


refugees coming in. Again, it is that sense, to me, of an importation


of aggression. Good for Kerry Mulligan for speaking up. It


wouldn't have got the coverage if it wasn't for this sort of celebrity


endorsement. It is what it is. It is done for a reason, quite rightly. It


expands the coverage and that is a good thing. There is a different


take from the Telegraph. Warnings as child migrants try to cross the


Channel. It is the typical photo of young men with their faces covered,


which makes us feel anxious because those images we associate with


violent activities. If you juxtapose that with the Observer story, it is


two different sides of the same story. It depends where you sit and


look at it. The Telegraph have a lot of the warnings. There is a


suggestion Chief inspectors of workers have warned that people were


posing as migrants and children as much as three years ago. Suggestions


that council officials offered to help with age verification have been


shunned by various authorities. The Telegraph agenda is to pull together


all the fears and preconceptions about the fact people are trying to


pose as children to get in and reaffirming it. The picture is the


key part of that. There is not too much mentioned about the group of


young girls the kingpin. It is the focus on the bogus element. One of


my favourite cartoonists is on the front page. It says children on


board apparently. On the front page of the Telegraph we also have a


story which will please a lot of people. Nuisance phone call bosses


to face Avei million pounds in fines. You get these nuisance phone


calls and that they could face fines. They come often via internet


phones so that is no redress because in the old days you could keep them


hanging on until they were paying huge phone bills if nothing else for


the price of knowing you. Now they bring fire escape or similar and


just stay on for ever. I think the problem with this isn't that most of


these companies close. They go into liquidation as soon as they are


fined. Somebody phoned up and it was a person who said how are you today?


I thought this is completely anonymous. They are just trying to


come up with an introduction other than I heard you have been involved


in an accident. The key thing is pinning it on the directors. They


liquidate the company is immediately so what the government is saying,


good work has been done on this by consumer groups who have led the way


on this in terms of saying that crackdown on these people. Let's see


if it works. It is all good work has been done on this by consumer groups


who have led the way on this in terms of saying that crackdown on


these people. Let's see if it works. The result was in theory, but I


don't think it. These calls, unfortunately. You can of course


ring the telephone service and get your phone number ticking off these


lists. I do it regularly for me and my mum. Top consumer tips. The


Sunday Times. I was entrapped by Isis Dons. This is about Mosul and


other parts of that conflict. It points out the risks people, war


correspondents, have to take to do their job. It is an extremely


dangerous job and I think it will get more dangerous for these


embedded correspondents were those on the outskirts of Mosul as they


get closer to the city and the fighting is likely to get harder and


more difficult and dangerous. There is already a suggestion that as many


as 250 men and boys used as human shields have been killed in Mosul.


It is going to get worse before gets better and the idea that Islamic


State or so embedded with the population just that everybody at


greater risk, both soldiers and civilians. They have been there for


more than two years. Children are not quite to school for two years


because they have been indoctrinated. It is terribly sad.


On a point of process, I am not sure I like personal stories on front


pages. I want the personal stories inside, even on a Sunday newspaper


and a more conventional story on the front page. I don't want something


that starts with the reporter on the front page. It doesn't diminish her


bravery in doing the job. She doesn't have to be there in the


sense she is doing her job and is reasonably well-paid by the Sunday


Times for doing it and that is very different for the people who are


trapped in their everyday. One of the reason I like Sunday newspaper


is that they have done something like what the Observer has done.


Three pages on Trump and Clinton. It has great graphics. This is rather


good. What they do is they say what would happen if you took out a black


voters or female voters or college educated voters or Hispanic voters?


How would it change the result? It shows, America is not unique in


this, how divided America is between these various groups. It also draws


a parallel with the UK with the Brexit foot. It looks at different


states, different areas. It looks at how white menfolk, generally Trump.


Of the black and Hispanic population thought, were women. It basically


says that Clinton is ahead by 48-2, the margin of error is still pretty


good, she is less unpopular than Trump, which seems to be key to this


election. It is 48-42, but a margin of error of 4%. The other big


question which is raised here is you don't count people who don't


normally vote. If they come out in big numbers it will change


everything. Trump only came top in the graphic that showed no black


voters. In every other combination, Clinton is ahead. That is quite


interesting. Our final story of the day is Ed balls. Out on a limb. This


is from the mail on Sunday. Why you should never ask Ed for a lift. What


is this about? He looks like a butcher. The EP member when a


butcher would wear a waistcoat and a hat? They were dancing. The looked


like Mr Morris, the old butcher in Morris when I was growing up,


sweeping some of the street and throwing around. He did really well


until that particular left and he just didn't pull off that list and


that is what cost. He is very stiff. He looked like a hammer, not like a


woman. He is the first to admit he is the worst dancer on the show but


everyone loves a try. Some of these people have been in West End


musicals. They are pretty good at it. It would be interesting to see


if he survives because he comes bottom of the leaderboard but does


better on the public vote. You can't help but admire him. He is like John


Sergeant but not so charming. There is a rigidity in him which is


difficult. You didn't notice it, I always thought he would be the sort


of man who would be good in a fight. When you see him it is like he is


frozen. I admire anyone who goes on it. In terms of his progress, he is


a pretty good. A lot of were pretty good at the start. Those of us who


are challenged by two left feet just admire the guts of taking part,


never mind how he did. That is it for The Papers. A reminder, we look


at the front pages every evening at a quarter to 11 on BBC News.


A cold start to the day, feeling like an autumnal morning out there.


Some mist and


Download Subtitles