No need to wait to see what's in the papers - Clive Myrie presents a lively and informed conversation about the next day's headlines.
Browse content similar to 27/12/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers
With me are the parliamentary journalist Tony Grew
and the broadcaster and journalist, Sean Dilley.
Tomorrow's front pages, starting with:
Actress Carrie Fisher's death at the age of 60
is the main focus of the Independent.
The paper also claims to have seen plans to topple Unite union's chief
Carrie Fisher also makes headlines in the Mail -
as does new analysis from researchers
that 80% of the middle-aged population
The Express also features the new health figures,
reporting that diabetes among the middle-aged has doubled.
The Daily Telegraph claims that the Armed Forces face another
round of cuts, partly due to the fall in the pound.
It also notes transport disruption due to cold weather across the UK.
The Times reports that the government will reform charges
for electric car charging, to combat the steep costs that
The paper also carries an image of Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia.
And finally, the Sun also pays tribute to Carrie Fisher,
and reports that George Michael will be buried in his
Carrie Fisher, whose picture is pretty much on every front pageant
not surprisingly. An iconic figure for many fans of the movies and
especially the Star Wars movies. She will be most remembered as Princess
Leia did not need a hero to rescue her. She was one of the first
Hollywood stars to speak openly about her struggles with addiction.
She spoke about her experience of going through rehab so for many
people she will be remembered as a feminist icon but also a mental
health figure. Very fond treatment of the death of someone who is much
loved across the world. Relatively young, like George Michael, who was
53, she was 60. I wonder whether when we hear these stories, yes,
they are iconic, it will be impactful too fans, the Star Wars
fans, to George Michael music fans. But the fact, 53, 60, I think people
find these less explicable than... You are talking about people who of
a horrible year for celebrities. What they had in common was that
creative but troubled souls, in a way? And the fact they spoke
publicly about that no doubt would have helped many people come to
terms with their own struggle. It is a bit of a cliche but at the time
when those two were doing it, it was something that was not done. Those
with things he did not talk about. Carrie Fisher, in particular, just
her spirit, her ability to come he knew to be a funny and controversial
and interesting person. The complete opposite of the bland movie star.
With George Michael as well. It was lovely to find out about the
altruistic acts that he was doing, charities, and money he gave away.
It is really interesting, you kind of learned something behind the
public face, behind the trouble and I suspect that will be the case with
Carrie Fisher as well. Personal stories that we may think, rather
guiltily that are not experience. The main front-page headline here, a
crackdown on rip-off charges for electric cars. One of the government
big push us is to get people to drive more low emission cars by
2020. But there is a disparity in terms of charging and the rules
about charging electric cars around the house. 90% are charged at home
but the problems people have is when they are further away from home,
some of these charges could reach 7.50 and find this fascinating, at
least 93 pricing accommodations are used in a different charge polls are
round the country. I loved the story because of their recognising
something stopped the target was to have 9% of low emission vehicles by
2020 now reports suggest that the way we are going it will be 7% and,
listen, statistics and figures aside, wouldn't it be brilliant as
well as getting capital cities with congestion charges, getting
incentive to get fuel free. A name for where you are worried about
whether the car is going to get from point now to point B it is called
range anxiety. Not enough charging point is one of the issues? It says
there are 11,000 public charging points in Britain... Which isn't
very many... There are actually significantly more than petrol
stations are relatively. It takes longer to charge a car... But those
charging point would not be surprised if they are concentrated
in the city. If you are in the countryside, you could find a sock
in difficulty. Frankly, my view is the government does not want to
invest in the infrastructure and spend money on it. They will have to
because with all sorts of insurance is, reducing emissions, we are going
to see those generous purchase fees. We are going to have to see that
because otherwise these diesel vehicles are going to carry on being
bought and government will have to Shell out money for not being as
green. The Telegraph have got the Armed Forces facing new cuts and
apparently because of the new pound? They have been under pressure right
from 2010 when the coalition government came into force.
Obviously several things have changed since then... Brexit. The
pound is much weaker and a lot of American equipment now costs a lot
more money. There are other pressures. The government came up
and said that we are funding the Armed Forces properly or the next
ten years. When you look behind the figures is what they have done is
taken out pension commitments, US peacekeeping costs and they have
dumped it elsewhere. It was creative counting by the government. The
Armed Forces would told they were getting more money but they were
hidden extras. And now the settlement given by the government
in the STS are, means that last year and this year they have not been
getting the money they were promised and they may be in financial
squeeze. Military costs money and they do not feel they are getting
the money. They are saying invest more and protect the nation. The
Telegraph have a story about potential peers, Dippel nominated
for a peerage -- people, should be given an interview to test their
suitability. Literally hundreds of people being nominated, be they do
know is, aides to senior politicians, almost a little piece
of living offers a reward. Remember cash for honours stop Theresa May's
ethics adviser... I think that is what they are being called... Is
saying we need to have a seat down, a jolly good chat, a cup of coffee
and work out whether they are suitable. Do you want the title or
would you be better off buying one of those titles of the Internet.
Wrinkly, if somebody is donating a lot of money to a political party
and in return they are receiving a peerage, I would suggest it is
tantamount to little more than bribery. What about the unions and
the Labour Party? State funding. There are not any other options.
There are. Since there is not the electoral system which many people
criticise any way, ultimately, it should erratically be the upper
house of the UK Parliament... Parliament is... Lets face it back
on King Charles I who lost his head therefore the Queen has lost her
right to have a say. The House of Lords is more or less having to
rubberstamp things because they are stuck in there in the first place.
They go through a screen each process are ready. But if you want
to sit and have a chat with them, they have to have some understanding
of the Constitution. Look, we need to separate honours from
legislation. What we do it like the state... That is too complicated.
And we do not have time to discuss that. The Daily Mail, health curse
of the middle-aged. Tony, I not looking at you. You are not even
middle-aged, I know that. 80%, they say are overweight, lazy or drink
too much. Thank you for that, by the way. These are shocking figures. 80%
of people in your age group... Thank you for that! 77% of men are
overweight. That alone is a public health crisis coming down the track
for the NHS. Then in diabetes. Only 13% of men and with 1% of women are
normal weight, physically active and do not treat too much. The problem
is these warnings have been issued before and no one has taken notice.
These people will end up having extremely unhealthy periods in the
latter part of their lives. It is a concern for the NHS, social care
cost an across-the-board. Seeing headlines like these, we have seen
them, but no one seems to be listening. Again, frankly, if you
look at all the headlines, what is interesting about the paper review
tonight is that all the papers have gone on the same story including
this public health story. This is not new news. There is a quiet
period where it is likely to get splashed on the papers. The cost of
the NHS, the future of the nation but ultimately what do you do to
persuade people. Do you say it is the job of the state to enforce that
on people which is a little bit 1984... Sorry, if you are going to
have a health service... It is another debate we cannot get into
because we only have one minute for the last story in the financial
time, high it executive pay and good performance. Apparently, the link is
negligible? Is that a surprise? No. The idea of performance related pay
within big organisations as was be difficult to prove. They have strove
not to try to make that direct correlation. Basically, it says that
over a decade, pay rises have gone up 80% for CEOs but 1% in terms of
performance. It seems we are not getting a good return for the
investment. I think I would say we are in a more competitive
environment now and if you pay peanuts... I do not have the finish
that sentence. You cannot underpay people. The market rate has gone up.
A bag of sugar has cost a lot more. My view is that if you're going to
raise the pay, you should also be increasing the pay for people that
actually work in the company. We have run out of time. Health issues,
constitutional issues... We got through the papers. Thank you. That
is it from the papers. Many thanks for joining us. That is all for us.