Browse content similar to 23/01/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
from Sportsday. Coming up in a moment, The Papers. | :00:00. | :00:17. | |
Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be | :00:18. | :00:20. | |
With me are Peter Spiegel, the UK news editor of the Financial Times | :00:21. | :00:25. | |
and the broadcaster and campaigner Lynn Faulds Wood. | :00:26. | :00:30. | |
Good to have you both. Let's look at some of the front pages. | :00:31. | :00:41. | |
Peter's paper, the Financial Times, leads with Donald | :00:42. | :00:43. | |
out of a free trade deal with Pacific Rim countries. | :00:44. | :00:47. | |
The paper says he's signalling he will put protectionism | :00:48. | :00:49. | |
The Telegraph says the new US President has vowed | :00:50. | :00:52. | |
to make the special relationship between Britain and | :00:53. | :00:54. | |
The 'i' concentrates on the political row | :00:55. | :00:57. | |
following reports that a Trident missile test went wrong last year. | :00:58. | :01:00. | |
It says the whole thing has descended into farce | :01:01. | :01:08. | |
to discuss the matter in the Commons. | :01:09. | :01:11. | |
The Metro quotes a White House Official who has | :01:12. | :01:13. | |
apparently told CNN that the unarmed missile DID blow itself up off | :01:14. | :01:16. | |
The Guardian also focuses on that missile yet looks ahead to | :01:17. | :01:27. | |
tomorrow's Supreme Court judgment as to whether the government needs to | :01:28. | :01:30. | |
consult MPs before invoking Article 50. | :01:31. | :01:32. | |
And the Express goes it alone, hailing a revolutionary | :01:33. | :01:34. | |
It is not ladies first tonight, its Americans first tonight. Peter, | :01:35. | :01:47. | |
we'll start with you. Sorry! Trump's Pacific trade exit, putting | :01:48. | :01:49. | |
protection at the heart of policy. If I may say so, your spin on it, | :01:50. | :01:56. | |
he's putting America first. That's right. It's not just the specific | :01:57. | :02:05. | |
trade deal, he announced today, he gathered a group of CEOs at the | :02:06. | :02:10. | |
White House, the first official meeting of his presidency and says | :02:11. | :02:13. | |
that if they move their plants overseas he will tax them. He said | :02:14. | :02:19. | |
he would call the Mexican and Canadian Prime ministers and | :02:20. | :02:22. | |
renegotiate Nafta. He has signalled that this is the most important | :02:23. | :02:27. | |
thing he will do. Economic experts are worried about this. This is how | :02:28. | :02:31. | |
the great depression happened, imposing tariffs up front. There's a | :02:32. | :02:36. | |
lot of nervousness in this global system which has been established | :02:37. | :02:43. | |
since World War II, being at risk and it is symbolic that he has made | :02:44. | :02:49. | |
this his first action. Lynn, experts don't matter, do they! It's America | :02:50. | :02:54. | |
first and he is the American president. This guide, if so clever, | :02:55. | :03:01. | |
he can't put figures, he says it will be a major border tax and then | :03:02. | :03:05. | |
says to these elite business people, almost all men, come on, let's get | :03:06. | :03:13. | |
some women in, trump. Clever women. I don't see that happening... One of | :03:14. | :03:20. | |
them, named Dale, he turned to him and said, Dale, you can build | :03:21. | :03:27. | |
monstrous... I wouldn't to the American accent, you can do | :03:28. | :03:30. | |
monstrance buildings, we will fast track you. Monstrous? What is this | :03:31. | :03:37. | |
for a president to talk? It resonates with voters, simple | :03:38. | :03:42. | |
language using small words, when you talk to political communicators in | :03:43. | :03:44. | |
the US, they say he's quite effective at this. A lot of | :03:45. | :03:51. | |
criticism comes from his own party which is interesting because it has | :03:52. | :03:54. | |
advocated for free trade the generations. One thing that one | :03:55. | :04:01. | |
previous Republican nominee for president said was, this is as much | :04:02. | :04:06. | |
about geo- strategy as trade, getting our allies in Asia, | :04:07. | :04:11. | |
Australia, New Zealand, against the Chinese. The argument is that he | :04:12. | :04:15. | |
doesn't see that bigger picture, everything is transactional for him. | :04:16. | :04:21. | |
It's all about him and his business. He will be filthy rich. One point | :04:22. | :04:29. | |
that I agree with him on, one criticism I made, it's all about and | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
save dangerous products and recourse, we have neglected | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
business, I think because every single thing I seem to buy is made | :04:38. | :04:42. | |
overseas, we don't have manufacturing any more so to that | :04:43. | :04:47. | |
extent I agree with him. That's the point, Peter, I was in Los Angeles | :04:48. | :04:53. | |
correspondent for the BBC in the 1990s, Nafta came in and jobs went. | :04:54. | :05:00. | |
Nothing was done about the communities with their jobs went | :05:01. | :05:11. | |
from. Like Scotland. There is a sense from his supporters that he is | :05:12. | :05:17. | |
on their side. He talked about Pennsylvania, Ohio. States that he | :05:18. | :05:26. | |
won because of these voters, working class white voters. Those who lost | :05:27. | :05:33. | |
their manufacturing jobs since Nafta. There is no doubt that even | :05:34. | :05:39. | |
people who are against Trump agreed that there are problems with local | :05:40. | :05:43. | |
trade policy. It's the same type of voter in middle England who voted | :05:44. | :05:48. | |
for Brexit, you see the same voters in France supporting Marine Le Pen. | :05:49. | :05:51. | |
This is a problem they have not addressed. That's the problem with | :05:52. | :05:59. | |
Scotland because the industry all went. Thank God for North Sea oil, | :06:00. | :06:04. | |
some would say. Interesting that you say that the workers work up to the | :06:05. | :06:09. | |
problems of globalisation. At Davos that did not look like it. Mainly | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
blokes again having a nice time. Right! Staying with the FT. Looking | :06:15. | :06:23. | |
forward to a pledge to nurture worlds leading industries. -- | :06:24. | :06:31. | |
lukewarm welcome. Jumping to the end of it, one woman, Director General | :06:32. | :06:35. | |
of the CBI, Caroline Fairburn, said it was better than not to have an | :06:36. | :06:40. | |
industrial strategy. It's been done by all sorts of problem, praising | :06:41. | :06:47. | |
the industrial strategy, giving that industrial spending accounts for 43% | :06:48. | :06:51. | |
of gross domestic product we need a plan on how to invest that money. | :06:52. | :06:57. | |
This does not look like a new plan, it looks like a mishmash of old | :06:58. | :07:03. | |
stuff. According to business sources, this has been hyped to the | :07:04. | :07:13. | |
hilt. It basically was a warmed over announcement of things announced | :07:14. | :07:18. | |
before. I think it was important to have that upfront, this is our | :07:19. | :07:27. | |
response, to the same voter that we're talking about with Trump, this | :07:28. | :07:31. | |
middle England voter, this response seems a bit empty. I think we had a | :07:32. | :07:37. | |
caller on that. You compare it to Trump. Would he call it a discussion | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
document? He would not come he would say, we are having this and then | :07:43. | :07:47. | |
argue about it later. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Sometimes a | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
good thing when you get a mealy-mouthed piece of stuff like | :07:53. | :07:59. | |
this which is only on your front page, no one else's. Let's go to the | :08:00. | :08:07. | |
Daily Telegraph. Trump promises closer ties with UK. They are making | :08:08. | :08:15. | |
it clear that this bilateral relationship is going to be | :08:16. | :08:19. | |
pre-eminent. But it's going to work. Your view? Interesting that they | :08:20. | :08:27. | |
have invited Theresa May is the first foreign leader to come over. | :08:28. | :08:35. | |
It is symbolic. The Brits are obsessed with this special | :08:36. | :08:42. | |
relationship. We are deluding ourselves by thinking that we will | :08:43. | :08:46. | |
be at the front of the queue, we have to years before Brexit happens, | :08:47. | :08:51. | |
we're talking about specific trade deals, other things high on the | :08:52. | :08:55. | |
agenda now when it comes to trade, suddenly turning round and asking | :08:56. | :09:03. | |
what will happen, even two countries that like each other, these things | :09:04. | :09:08. | |
take almost a decade. We saw it with Canada, this evil trade monster! I | :09:09. | :09:14. | |
think we have a lot of nice words coming out of the White House today | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
and Sean Spicer said nice things about the Prime Minister but... | :09:19. | :09:23. | |
Lynn, how does that square with what you said earlier, I win, you lose, | :09:24. | :09:33. | |
how will we get a great trade deal if he's looking out for American | :09:34. | :09:38. | |
workers? If you look at the bottom line we've never had a great trade | :09:39. | :09:42. | |
deal with the United States. We deal more with Scotland which is 5 | :09:43. | :09:47. | |
million people than we do with 300 million people in the USA. We talk | :09:48. | :09:51. | |
about the special relationship, they never talk about it in the States, | :09:52. | :10:00. | |
do they? Honestly. I would say, on trade and economics, No. I spent | :10:01. | :10:04. | |
years in the Pentagon and frequently you would go in and see people in | :10:05. | :10:08. | |
senior positions, and they would be British. So on military intelligence | :10:09. | :10:13. | |
there is that special relationship. There is intelligence sharing | :10:14. | :10:19. | |
between two countries that no other two countries share. Liverpool we | :10:20. | :10:35. | |
all speak English. About Michael Fallon he says he can't say anything | :10:36. | :10:40. | |
but Americans are spilling the beans. I did actually watch this. | :10:41. | :10:52. | |
Michael Fallon, is see a Sir, or a lord, I don't like titles I will | :10:53. | :10:56. | |
call Michael. He was talking in the House of Commons today, and | :10:57. | :10:59. | |
apparently not knowing that the Americans were spilling the beans | :11:00. | :11:02. | |
because one backbencher stood up and said, do you know there's an | :11:03. | :11:06. | |
American spilling the beans? Why were they not better briefed and | :11:07. | :11:10. | |
also yesterday when you saw Theresa May when she was asked four times on | :11:11. | :11:17. | |
the Andrew Marr show, that was a pathetic response for a minister who | :11:18. | :11:21. | |
still enjoys some credibility from us. She's got to sharpen up act and | :11:22. | :11:29. | |
get PR advisers. The Trident missile system is from the USA. The US Navy | :11:30. | :11:39. | |
has two overs either testing because it was in Florida. I do have some | :11:40. | :11:43. | |
sympathy that the government because first of all missile failures | :11:44. | :11:47. | |
happen. This just happened to be very badly timed. The other thing | :11:48. | :11:51. | |
is, if you are having a nuclear deterrent don't tell the world it | :11:52. | :11:56. | |
doesn't work! I have some sympathy with the Prime Minister, you don't | :11:57. | :12:06. | |
go public about this. I suppose the point is, for national security | :12:07. | :12:15. | |
reasons... We don't fire these missiles often because they are very | :12:16. | :12:24. | |
expensive. We have a huge investment in something, we are not even sure | :12:25. | :12:32. | |
it works that way. Crash test dummies, the USA trips up Theresa | :12:33. | :12:39. | |
May and Michael Fallon. The Metro is showing the other papers the way. We | :12:40. | :12:43. | |
are running out of time so I think we will be going to, a very quick | :12:44. | :12:48. | |
look at the Daily Express. Main must fast-track Brexit, a big decision | :12:49. | :12:55. | |
from the Supreme Court tomorrow morning. This is one of the routes | :12:56. | :12:59. | |
we expect the government to go down, if they lose, and the High Court | :13:00. | :13:03. | |
says, you must go to parliament before you invoke the divorce close, | :13:04. | :13:08. | |
they will put out a one sentence law, which says, we give the Prime | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
Minister the right to trigger Article 50. That's basically what | :13:14. | :13:16. | |
Tory backbenchers are suggesting. The Guardian has an interesting | :13:17. | :13:22. | |
story which makes the point not very convincingly that legal advice says | :13:23. | :13:33. | |
you cannot go that way. Not very well drafted legislation and we | :13:34. | :13:40. | |
could end up with more. You need to go to a longer process than a one | :13:41. | :13:45. | |
sentence piece of legislation. Now we will link two stories, Trident | :13:46. | :13:50. | |
and another story that has been running throughout the day, problems | :13:51. | :13:54. | |
potentially with browning your food a bit too much and the possibility | :13:55. | :14:00. | |
that it might show signs of cancer in a test animal. This is the Matt | :14:01. | :14:07. | |
cartoon. The latest submarine, armed with lethal overcooked roast | :14:08. | :14:12. | |
potatoes. There is a real sense that the roast potatoes might work better | :14:13. | :14:22. | |
than the rest. I think this is a terrible story, in a way. We've got | :14:23. | :14:27. | |
to stop battling people with all the things that are bad for them because | :14:28. | :14:32. | |
they just give up, smoking, drinking too much and being overweight. If | :14:33. | :14:36. | |
you can crack those three things written would be much happier. | :14:37. | :14:42. | |
Peter, you weren't brown your toast too much tomorrow? I've stopped. | :14:43. | :14:49. | |
It's got to be gold. Thank you both for joining us for a look at Fleet | :14:50. | :14:55. | |
Street's finest work. That's it for the papers, many thanks to our | :14:56. | :15:00. | |
guests, Peter and Lynn. Much more coming up. Now it's time for the | :15:01. | :15:01. | |
weather. | :15:02. | :15:05. |