01/04/2017 The Papers


Similar Content

Browse content similar to 01/04/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!



complexion to the weather. Sunshine for Cardiff and London. More on the


website. We'll be taking a look at tomorrow


morning's papers in a moment. Britain says that Gibraltar cannot


be used as a bargaining chip Spain insists it will have a direct


say on the territory once it leaves the EU.


TRANSLATION: On Gibraltar, no agreement between the European Union


and the UK will apply without the consent of Spain.


A hate crime investigation is launched after a teenage asylum


seeker was attacked by a gang of youths at a bus stop


in south London and left in a critical condition.


We believe it is a hate crime. Prior to the attack taking place, the


young person was asked where they were from an when they said they


were an asylum seeker, that is when the frenzied attack took place.


At least 100 people are reported to have been killed


by a massive mudslide in southern Colombia.


The mud engulfed homes and roads, hundreds of families are missing.


Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be


With me are Anne Ashworth, associate editor


at the Times and Bonnie Greer, playwright and writer


The Mail on Sunday continues its campaign against videos


on Google and YouTube which show violent or terror related content.


Tomorrow's story highlights a video showing how


Britain's airports and nuclear power stations need to tighten


their defences against terrorist attacks in the face of increased


threats to electronic security systems, that's according to a story


on the Sunday Telegraph's front page.


British passports could soon be changing colour to dark blue,


as part of a ?500 million post-Brexit redesign,


that story on the front page of the Sunday Express.


The Sunday Times has a story about how


tens of thousands pounds a year in expenses for attending the House


of Lords while making little or no contribution


And the Observer reports pressures being put on the Government


by some cross-party MPs who want to guarantee that EU


nationals would still be able to work in the NHS after Brexit.


The Sunday Telegraph, couple of stories here. Boris says Gibraltar


is not for sale, saying Britain's supporters packable and rock like,


which is pretty good, isn't it? The point is this has taken people buy


supplies -- surprise. It was a surprise element, but the Spanish


would have detail over the future of Gibraltar. It seems to have caused


extraordinary surprise today. This should have been something I would


have been known. Every time that Spain has an opportunity to make a


territorial claim about Gibraltar, it takes it. The ministers weren't


prepared for this, that is the shocking part. For Spain, it is


national pride. Absolutely. The issue is whether we are prepared for


everything that is going to come and because this is about their


territory as well, and the fact that Gibraltar was almost unanimous


voting to remain, and whether it is as legitimate argument or not, the


surprise is what is worrying. But so many Gibraltarians want to remain


part of Britain, and always have. They always have but they also want


to remain in the EU. I wonder whether we are going to be facing


some rather tough decisions and Gibraltar. There was a discussion in


2001, 2002, and there was a referendum on it, on the whole issue


of whether they wanted to be part, still remain as UK citizens, part of


written. And I wonder whether there will be an issue of joint


sovereignty, whether it will emerge again. The other deal on the table


are EU nationals, what is best Dyche is going to be? And UK Brits, what


will their status be in the EU? The second issue is that border with


Northern Ireland. That is the only border we have with EU, and everyone


seems to be shocked that this is all on the table. And there is a


multiplicity with which we will be confronted. The Telegraph lead story


is that airports and nuclear power stations are on terror alerts. What


is the information? There is an old physicist axiom about this kind of


thing which it always boils down to something is always making something


ahead of you and what is happening, allegedly Isis, I quit Daesh, has


taken some of these -- I call it Daesh, take the airport security and


build it, they have discovered they have the ability to actually get


batteries inside of computers or whatever that can't be read. Always


difficult to remain ahead of people who have time on their hands to come


up with these schemes. A threat also to nuclear. It is very, very clear


that once they've got the technology that Isis has, they are one step


ahead of the security. Or they have now is this electronic caliphate,


they are beaten on the ground so they have to keep it growing, they


have to build these incredible... They are beating us on the


technology. That makes them more dangerous. They are 100 times more


dangerous. They are thinking about how to take everyday electronic


items and get them past the system, and that was always going to happen.


The Mail on Sunday, part of their campaign against the kind of videos


you can access on very open platforms, Google but money is the


headline, web giant cashes in on vile video showing how to get


through a stab vest. A very troubling is Tory. This man has


prepared a video made in a German word, exactly how you can use a


knife to get through a stab vest. It is on YouTube. He is receiving money


for sharing this stuff and is unapologetic about it and it seems


as if we have this it Jewish and with Google -- it seems as if we


have this situation with Google. There is a lot of pressure ring on


companies like YouTube. They are responding in some cases to taking


down these videos. I agree with you 100% but the big issue going forward


is the question of freedom of access, freedom of speech, how do


you define, with these open access media, how do you define what is


indecent? I agree with you 100% and that becomes the issue and these are


multinational corporations. Google do respond to things if you raise an


objection. How can it possibly, with the best will in the world, they


can't police the whole site, can they? Then maybe they need to be


some rules that it complies with. It is not a platform, it is a


publisher. People are making money out of it. We need to get a grip of


this and I am astounded that the government has been so slow on


getting onto this. I agree with you again, I think it partly has to do


with well Google is located, that is a difficult and for the government


to intervene on, but I agree with you. Was there supposed to be a


Google tax which hasn't been paid? It is difficult to enforce these


things, it just goes around, these multinationals. The Sunday Times


reveal rich peers are paid for doing nothing. Some laws, not all of them,


get up to ?40,000 tax-free from doing much work. This has resurfaced


quite a bit. We are trying to understand what this is. Is it a


false flag to mark of course they get paid. What is this story


actually about? They are not breaking any rules, they are


claiming money. We all know that so what is this actually about? Is it


about getting rid of the Lords altogether? Or what is it? I didn't


see anything in the story that was new or that would make me think, oh


my God, this is horrible. And we never hear about those laws who do a


great deal of work who are experts in their own field, no great deal,


and you might actually say that the laws is quite cheap for what we get.


A second elected chamber would be more expensive, potentially, but


they would be. Well, I mean... Far be it from me to say... Oh, God on,


Bonnie! You are here to save! The story, in particular, about their


getting paid too much money, I don't know what this is about because


people complain about that all the time and exact, there are experts in


their that work very hard. Let's look at the Observer. Three stories


here are related to Brexit in some way. What a surprise. Here we have


the Observer. NHS recruits must be given special status after Brexit,


MPs urge. The fear is that there are so many people who come to the UK to


work in the NHS that could we really do without them if they were not


allowed to stay or come in the future? There are studies that would


show what it would be like if they were not here and it is not a pretty


picture. It is the same with investment bankers who found most of


our houses and businesses, they want passports to be able to stay, some


of them are thinking about going to Dublin. I think someone should do a


study and do the NHS, and show all the EU nationals out of the NHS.


That is the story. Do a model, and let the nation see what it looks


like without EU nationals. We can train our own people to work in


these roles. I think this story is interesting in that the focus is


generally on the hospitality industry and the migrant labour


there but we tend to forget how many Spaniards or whatever are working


within the NHS, and that will be a big row within all these


negotiations, as to when the start date for people may be having to


leave begins. And we are starting to find out how much this state is so


into wind and interwoven with the single lock, it is going to be


massive, massive, massive. Have a look at a cup stories the


Sunday express. EU sends us that bill for Wi-Fi and a trip to


dentist. Brussels would pay for broad band, and it had -- Italian


fishermen even after we quit the EU. Spanish Ph.D. Students will also


benefit from our generosity. It all comes down to what the bill will be


for this divorce, how the kitties and how extensive it is. It is not


quite clear sense none of this has been decided. That we will be paying


any of these bills. This is all a matter of negotiation. But we have


been given fairly clear integrations that there could be a bill of ?50


million for commitments we have made upfront. It is not uncomplicated. It


is a contract. So, either the country decides to pay the contract


or they don't pay the contract, I don't think it is very complicated.


It is a matter of people starting to see now how much we wound up and


tied into it. More pressing issue on the front page, potentially, true


blue passport reborn. Do you remember those? Liz Hurley was her


passport back. She once Deutsch Marks, she wants Franks, she was


Lira. This is a ?500 million project. There are figures all over


these papers and I am never sure what it actually means. Would it


only cost 500 million to replace British maroon passports? They keep


calling them pink ex mark they are maroon purple! It is fairly easy to


work out the cost but it is not the most pressing of issue, is it? For


some people, nationhood is exemplified by the passport. But


there are people who don't know the Navy passport, there are lots of


people in the passport who don't have a passport and certainly not a


pink one? You do have to remove the cover when you go through passport


control. That is it for the papers this hour.


You'll both be back at 11.30pm for another look at the stories


Download Subtitles