01/04/2017 The Papers

complexion to the weather. Sunshine for Cardiff and London. More on the

website. We'll be taking a look at tomorrow

morning's papers in a moment. Britain says that Gibraltar cannot

be used as a bargaining chip Spain insists it will have a direct

say on the territory once it leaves the EU.

TRANSLATION: On Gibraltar, no agreement between the European Union

and the UK will apply without the consent of Spain.

A hate crime investigation is launched after a teenage asylum

seeker was attacked by a gang of youths at a bus stop

in south London and left in a critical condition.

We believe it is a hate crime. Prior to the attack taking place, the

young person was asked where they were from an when they said they

were an asylum seeker, that is when the frenzied attack took place.

At least 100 people are reported to have been killed

by a massive mudslide in southern Colombia.

The mud engulfed homes and roads, hundreds of families are missing.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

With me are Anne Ashworth, associate editor

at the Times and Bonnie Greer, playwright and writer

The Mail on Sunday continues its campaign against videos

on Google and YouTube which show violent or terror related content.

Tomorrow's story highlights a video showing how

Britain's airports and nuclear power stations need to tighten

their defences against terrorist attacks in the face of increased

threats to electronic security systems, that's according to a story

on the Sunday Telegraph's front page.

British passports could soon be changing colour to dark blue,

as part of a ?500 million post-Brexit redesign,

that story on the front page of the Sunday Express.

The Sunday Times has a story about how

tens of thousands pounds a year in expenses for attending the House

of Lords while making little or no contribution

And the Observer reports pressures being put on the Government

by some cross-party MPs who want to guarantee that EU

nationals would still be able to work in the NHS after Brexit.

The Sunday Telegraph, couple of stories here. Boris says Gibraltar

is not for sale, saying Britain's supporters packable and rock like,

which is pretty good, isn't it? The point is this has taken people buy

supplies -- surprise. It was a surprise element, but the Spanish

would have detail over the future of Gibraltar. It seems to have caused

extraordinary surprise today. This should have been something I would

have been known. Every time that Spain has an opportunity to make a

territorial claim about Gibraltar, it takes it. The ministers weren't

prepared for this, that is the shocking part. For Spain, it is

national pride. Absolutely. The issue is whether we are prepared for

everything that is going to come and because this is about their

territory as well, and the fact that Gibraltar was almost unanimous

voting to remain, and whether it is as legitimate argument or not, the

surprise is what is worrying. But so many Gibraltarians want to remain

part of Britain, and always have. They always have but they also want

to remain in the EU. I wonder whether we are going to be facing

some rather tough decisions and Gibraltar. There was a discussion in

2001, 2002, and there was a referendum on it, on the whole issue

of whether they wanted to be part, still remain as UK citizens, part of

written. And I wonder whether there will be an issue of joint

sovereignty, whether it will emerge again. The other deal on the table

are EU nationals, what is best Dyche is going to be? And UK Brits, what

will their status be in the EU? The second issue is that border with

Northern Ireland. That is the only border we have with EU, and everyone

seems to be shocked that this is all on the table. And there is a

multiplicity with which we will be confronted. The Telegraph lead story

is that airports and nuclear power stations are on terror alerts. What

is the information? There is an old physicist axiom about this kind of

thing which it always boils down to something is always making something

ahead of you and what is happening, allegedly Isis, I quit Daesh, has

taken some of these -- I call it Daesh, take the airport security and

build it, they have discovered they have the ability to actually get

batteries inside of computers or whatever that can't be read. Always

difficult to remain ahead of people who have time on their hands to come

up with these schemes. A threat also to nuclear. It is very, very clear

that once they've got the technology that Isis has, they are one step

ahead of the security. Or they have now is this electronic caliphate,

they are beaten on the ground so they have to keep it growing, they

have to build these incredible... They are beating us on the

technology. That makes them more dangerous. They are 100 times more

dangerous. They are thinking about how to take everyday electronic

items and get them past the system, and that was always going to happen.

The Mail on Sunday, part of their campaign against the kind of videos

you can access on very open platforms, Google but money is the

headline, web giant cashes in on vile video showing how to get

through a stab vest. A very troubling is Tory. This man has

prepared a video made in a German word, exactly how you can use a

knife to get through a stab vest. It is on YouTube. He is receiving money

for sharing this stuff and is unapologetic about it and it seems

as if we have this it Jewish and with Google -- it seems as if we

have this situation with Google. There is a lot of pressure ring on

companies like YouTube. They are responding in some cases to taking

down these videos. I agree with you 100% but the big issue going forward

is the question of freedom of access, freedom of speech, how do

you define, with these open access media, how do you define what is

indecent? I agree with you 100% and that becomes the issue and these are

multinational corporations. Google do respond to things if you raise an

objection. How can it possibly, with the best will in the world, they

can't police the whole site, can they? Then maybe they need to be

some rules that it complies with. It is not a platform, it is a

publisher. People are making money out of it. We need to get a grip of

this and I am astounded that the government has been so slow on

getting onto this. I agree with you again, I think it partly has to do

with well Google is located, that is a difficult and for the government

to intervene on, but I agree with you. Was there supposed to be a

Google tax which hasn't been paid? It is difficult to enforce these

things, it just goes around, these multinationals. The Sunday Times

reveal rich peers are paid for doing nothing. Some laws, not all of them,

get up to ?40,000 tax-free from doing much work. This has resurfaced

quite a bit. We are trying to understand what this is. Is it a

false flag to mark of course they get paid. What is this story

actually about? They are not breaking any rules, they are

claiming money. We all know that so what is this actually about? Is it

about getting rid of the Lords altogether? Or what is it? I didn't

see anything in the story that was new or that would make me think, oh

my God, this is horrible. And we never hear about those laws who do a

great deal of work who are experts in their own field, no great deal,

and you might actually say that the laws is quite cheap for what we get.

A second elected chamber would be more expensive, potentially, but

they would be. Well, I mean... Far be it from me to say... Oh, God on,

Bonnie! You are here to save! The story, in particular, about their

getting paid too much money, I don't know what this is about because

people complain about that all the time and exact, there are experts in

their that work very hard. Let's look at the Observer. Three stories

here are related to Brexit in some way. What a surprise. Here we have

the Observer. NHS recruits must be given special status after Brexit,

MPs urge. The fear is that there are so many people who come to the UK to

work in the NHS that could we really do without them if they were not

allowed to stay or come in the future? There are studies that would

show what it would be like if they were not here and it is not a pretty

picture. It is the same with investment bankers who found most of

our houses and businesses, they want passports to be able to stay, some

of them are thinking about going to Dublin. I think someone should do a

study and do the NHS, and show all the EU nationals out of the NHS.

That is the story. Do a model, and let the nation see what it looks

like without EU nationals. We can train our own people to work in

these roles. I think this story is interesting in that the focus is

generally on the hospitality industry and the migrant labour

there but we tend to forget how many Spaniards or whatever are working

within the NHS, and that will be a big row within all these

negotiations, as to when the start date for people may be having to

leave begins. And we are starting to find out how much this state is so

into wind and interwoven with the single lock, it is going to be

massive, massive, massive. Have a look at a cup stories the

Sunday express. EU sends us that bill for Wi-Fi and a trip to

dentist. Brussels would pay for broad band, and it had -- Italian

fishermen even after we quit the EU. Spanish Ph.D. Students will also

benefit from our generosity. It all comes down to what the bill will be

for this divorce, how the kitties and how extensive it is. It is not

quite clear sense none of this has been decided. That we will be paying

any of these bills. This is all a matter of negotiation. But we have

been given fairly clear integrations that there could be a bill of ?50

million for commitments we have made upfront. It is not uncomplicated. It

is a contract. So, either the country decides to pay the contract

or they don't pay the contract, I don't think it is very complicated.

It is a matter of people starting to see now how much we wound up and

tied into it. More pressing issue on the front page, potentially, true

blue passport reborn. Do you remember those? Liz Hurley was her

passport back. She once Deutsch Marks, she wants Franks, she was

Lira. This is a ?500 million project. There are figures all over

these papers and I am never sure what it actually means. Would it

only cost 500 million to replace British maroon passports? They keep

calling them pink ex mark they are maroon purple! It is fairly easy to

work out the cost but it is not the most pressing of issue, is it? For

some people, nationhood is exemplified by the passport. But

there are people who don't know the Navy passport, there are lots of

people in the passport who don't have a passport and certainly not a

pink one? You do have to remove the cover when you go through passport

control. That is it for the papers this hour.

You'll both be back at 11.30pm for another look at the stories