Browse content similar to 16/07/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be | :00:17. | :00:19. | |
With me are Ruth Lea, who's Economic Adviser | :00:20. | :00:22. | |
to the Arbuthnot Banking Group, and the journalist and columnist, | :00:23. | :00:26. | |
Tomorrow's Financial Times leads on what it says is the Chancellor's | :00:27. | :00:32. | |
bid to cushion the blow of Brexit with a two-year transition deal. | :00:33. | :00:37. | |
The Metro says the Chancellor is at loggerheads with | :00:38. | :00:43. | |
some fellow ministers, who he accuses of trying | :00:44. | :00:45. | |
to undermine his strategy for a soft Brexit. | :00:46. | :00:47. | |
The Daily Telegraph also leads on the supposed rift | :00:48. | :00:50. | |
between Philip Hammond and his Cabinet colleagues, | :00:51. | :00:51. | |
one of whom accuses the Chancellor of trying to keep Britain in the EU. | :00:52. | :00:55. | |
The Times says Britain is wasting billions on fighter jets | :00:56. | :00:57. | |
that the RAF won't be able to use because of defence cuts. | :00:58. | :01:00. | |
Call 999 - get Skype instead - that's the headline | :01:01. | :01:02. | |
on the Daily Mail, which reports that some patients are being denied | :01:03. | :01:05. | |
And the Sun leads on the new Doctor Who - | :01:06. | :01:15. | |
the 13th Time Lord is the first woman to play the role. | :01:16. | :01:20. | |
The Mirror leads the new Doctor -- greeted the new doctor with delight. | :01:21. | :01:31. | |
We might have fun with that in a bit! Let's start with what's going | :01:32. | :01:36. | |
on with Brexit and Philip Hammond. The Daily Telegraph says - Hammond | :01:37. | :01:44. | |
accused of Brexit treachery. Senior Cabinet minister says Chancellor is | :01:45. | :01:47. | |
trying to deliberately frustrate withdrawal. Not too many names | :01:48. | :01:51. | |
mentioned in these articles about who is doing what to whom. Everyone | :01:52. | :01:59. | |
is being treacherous. They've got a Cabinet minister who allegedly told | :02:00. | :02:06. | |
the Daily Telegraph that Philip Hammond is working to frustrate | :02:07. | :02:09. | |
Brexit and is treating league supporting ministers like pirates | :02:10. | :02:15. | |
who have taken him prisoner. It is getting really quite weird, isn't | :02:16. | :02:20. | |
it? It is indeed. There doesn't seem to be much discipline in the | :02:21. | :02:24. | |
Cabinet, if I may say so. I think the Prime Minister should get to | :02:25. | :02:29. | |
grips with these naughty boys, don't you? But she's only a woman! Can | :02:30. | :02:39. | |
they run a Government? I think Mrs Thatcher did. I think this is hard | :02:40. | :02:44. | |
on Philip Hammond. I read his Mansion house speech about two or | :02:45. | :02:49. | |
three weeks ago and I came here that particular night to say I thought it | :02:50. | :02:54. | |
was a very good speech. I thought he made it clear that we were leaving | :02:55. | :02:59. | |
the customs union and single market but he was keen to have a | :03:00. | :03:06. | |
transitional arrangement. It strikes me as eminently sensible. And you | :03:07. | :03:13. | |
are pro-Brexit... I thought it was eminently sensible and I couldn't | :03:14. | :03:19. | |
see anything in the speech to object to, so I don't see what is going on | :03:20. | :03:24. | |
with these leave supporters. The whole thing seems to be getting out | :03:25. | :03:29. | |
of control. That problem with that prominent Brexiteers is that they | :03:30. | :03:36. | |
are constantly on edge, they don't trust anybody, not even their own | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
colleagues, they think this thing will be snatched from them, and they | :03:41. | :03:46. | |
have won the battle but if they don't behave themselves, they will | :03:47. | :03:52. | |
lose the war. David Davis, who I think is doing an excellent job, | :03:53. | :04:00. | |
came out with papers last week and again, it was quite obvious from | :04:01. | :04:07. | |
these papers that we are leaving. He is not trying to stop Brexit? It was | :04:08. | :04:16. | |
unequivocal - we are out. Unless Tony Blair has his own way, way | :04:17. | :04:21. | |
leaving. It's not that straightforward, is it? -- we are | :04:22. | :04:27. | |
leaving. Between now and then, there will be so much happening, and will | :04:28. | :04:33. | |
have to be some tempering of the we are leaving and leading in this way, | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
because the EU will put demands on us, and it will have to be a | :04:38. | :04:41. | |
negotiation, and that means give and take. There are still millions of | :04:42. | :04:45. | |
people in this country who still don't agree with it. I know, you | :04:46. | :04:51. | |
don't need to put up your hand! Whatever you think about the EU, and | :04:52. | :04:56. | |
a final agreement will have to be negotiated, no question, but the EU | :04:57. | :05:00. | |
has accepted we are leaving, and we are leaving the customs union and | :05:01. | :05:05. | |
single market. There are arguments over the European Court of Justice, | :05:06. | :05:09. | |
but to cut a long story short, they need to settle down. We won't let | :05:10. | :05:13. | |
them settle down now, because we are going to look at the Metro. There is | :05:14. | :05:21. | |
supposed to be a safe space in the Cabinet where people can discuss | :05:22. | :05:25. | |
things without it getting out. You need that candid exchange of views, | :05:26. | :05:29. | |
and if the Chancellor is saying, I don't like people leaking... I don't | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
think it is about Brexit any more but about a leadership bid, about | :05:35. | :05:39. | |
trying to find out who will replace Theresa May, and that is the second | :05:40. | :05:41. | |
problem that is now affecting the way the Brexit discussions are | :05:42. | :05:46. | |
going. I don't have very much time for Philip Hammond, but I do think | :05:47. | :05:53. | |
it must be awful to say things in a safe space, and the very next hour, | :05:54. | :05:58. | |
it's out there. When he says he thinks that Brexiteers are trying to | :05:59. | :06:03. | |
undermine him because he wants to make sure that jobs and the economy | :06:04. | :06:10. | |
are protected... It's sensible. But how are the pro-Brexit MPs trying to | :06:11. | :06:16. | |
undermine his efforts? I don't understand why they are doing it. | :06:17. | :06:22. | |
But how are they doing it? I thought his Mansion house speech was fine, | :06:23. | :06:34. | |
just that he wanted the transition 's -- transitional arrangements. | :06:35. | :06:47. | |
The trouble is, they are positioning. It is time that somehow | :06:48. | :06:57. | |
discipline was imposed upon the cabinet, because this looks | :06:58. | :06:59. | |
absolutely terrible. I think that Philip Hammond is right that if he | :07:00. | :07:03. | |
says things in Cabinet, however bizarre they might be, then they | :07:04. | :07:08. | |
should be confidential. Is it odd that Europe has been akin to -- a | :07:09. | :07:14. | |
bone of contention in the Tory Party for as long as I can remember, and a | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
referendum was supposed to fix this, and yet there is all this | :07:19. | :07:22. | |
infighting, whether it is about Brexit of leadership. It is both, | :07:23. | :07:26. | |
and I think there is this total paranoia that somehow this thing | :07:27. | :07:30. | |
will be taken away from them and there will be no healing in the Tory | :07:31. | :07:35. | |
Party for the next 100 years. The general election changed it all. | :07:36. | :07:40. | |
Shall we move the Times? There is an investigation here - Britain spends | :07:41. | :07:50. | |
billions on flawed fighter jets. The cost is going up and up, Ruth - why? | :07:51. | :07:57. | |
I wouldn't like to say. Unfortunate, as that is what I just asked you! I | :07:58. | :08:02. | |
am not an expert on the defence budget. I know. This investigation | :08:03. | :08:08. | |
suggests that the next generation of warplanes will be unable to function | :08:09. | :08:11. | |
properly because they won't have the money to run them. That may be | :08:12. | :08:20. | |
right, but I think that big question is, the Ministry of Defence will | :08:21. | :08:24. | |
have to answer this, go back to the Times and all these critics and say, | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
these new fighter jets will function properly. The burden of proof is | :08:29. | :08:33. | |
really on the Ministry of Defence to explain themselves. I can help you | :08:34. | :08:37. | |
with that because we have had a statement from the MoD, and it says | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
Cole and we are committed to the capital air35 programme, which is on | :08:42. | :08:46. | |
time, within costs, and offers the best capability for our Armed | :08:47. | :08:54. | |
Forces. -- and it says: We are committed... If you look at the | :08:55. | :09:02. | |
article here, some of the problems are that it will not be able to | :09:03. | :09:08. | |
operate without revealing its position, which is not very stealth, | :09:09. | :09:15. | |
is it? In the MoD, under successive governments, not a political point, | :09:16. | :09:20. | |
there has been massive overspending and bad purchasing, and unexplained | :09:21. | :09:28. | |
decisions in this department for the longest time. But also cuts. The | :09:29. | :09:34. | |
cuts, we understand and we have been told about, but this world of | :09:35. | :09:40. | |
profligacy, because it is defence, there is a protection around it. | :09:41. | :09:45. | |
They had to explain themselves, that's the bottom line. The MoD is | :09:46. | :09:49. | |
also slightly compromised in terms of who they can get to build things | :09:50. | :09:52. | |
for us, because you can't just give it to anyone anywhere in the world. | :09:53. | :09:57. | |
It has to be allies or preferably built here. Why aren't we building | :09:58. | :10:02. | |
them here? Since it was British jobs for British workers, why are we not | :10:03. | :10:08. | |
building it here? It may be more efficient to buy from the States. | :10:09. | :10:13. | |
The key thing is, the MoD has to explain itself. It is only | :10:14. | :10:19. | |
efficient, and I never understand this... You can't -- if you say you | :10:20. | :10:26. | |
were building for a certain price, you can't keep increasing it, but | :10:27. | :10:31. | |
you can if you are building it for a Government. Will will have to see | :10:32. | :10:36. | |
what the MoD has to say. -- we will have to see. | :10:37. | :10:49. | |
The sun Doct-her Who. Jodie is first woman doctor. She has been doing | :10:50. | :11:01. | |
some filming already. That is the Telegraph - we want the sun. Is that | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
possible? Shall I fill it up for you? You have it. What do we think? | :11:07. | :11:14. | |
An excellent idea. It says here that Doctor who started 54 years ago. I | :11:15. | :11:23. | |
remember that. Of course you do! 1963, with William Hartnell. But it | :11:24. | :11:26. | |
is the first time we have had a woman. And such a to do about it for | :11:27. | :11:35. | |
some people. 2017 and we are getting excited about this? I mean, | :11:36. | :11:44. | |
goodness! It's about time too. Having had a woman Prime Minister in | :11:45. | :11:50. | |
1979... It should have happened a long time ago. Very good that we're | :11:51. | :11:55. | |
doing it now. She looks good. And she is a very good actress. I | :11:56. | :12:01. | |
watched her in Broadchurch. It will be interesting to see what kind of | :12:02. | :12:05. | |
doctor she will be and whether they will give her a male assistant, | :12:06. | :12:12. | |
perhaps you will have a woman. One of the newspapers is suggesting that | :12:13. | :12:17. | |
perhaps the BBC are being too to PC in doing this. Of course. Any change | :12:18. | :12:29. | |
that comes up, this is the accusation. 50% or more of the | :12:30. | :12:33. | |
licence payers are female. We pay for this. I can't get too excited | :12:34. | :12:38. | |
about it. I'm very pleased that we got this female Doctor Who, but I | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
can't say that it's going to keep me awake at night. No, we shouldn't... | :12:43. | :12:46. | |
It is excellent, I'm really thrilled. How long have you been so | :12:47. | :12:56. | |
powerful in the banking sector? I have not seen Doctor Who since Jon | :12:57. | :13:00. | |
Pertwee. I think that was the last time. If the banks could let you do | :13:01. | :13:06. | |
this, why can't a fictional television programme? It's | :13:07. | :13:10. | |
excellent, excellent. Isn't it quite sad that we even have to comment on | :13:11. | :13:15. | |
it? Anyway, we will see, and I hope she will win round some of those who | :13:16. | :13:20. | |
say they will never watch it again because they have spoilt the | :13:21. | :13:27. | |
franchise. People are saying that. Both people are stupid. I am | :13:28. | :13:31. | |
interested in when the second woman will come on and get the same role. | :13:32. | :13:35. | |
That will tell us a lot. Or someone who is not white will stop oh my | :13:36. | :13:41. | |
goodness! Steady on, steady on! One thing at a time! Back to the | :13:42. | :13:46. | |
Telegraph, if you would, please. If I may, to quote Ruth. BBC offers | :13:47. | :13:54. | |
stars protection. This is because the high-paid so-called talent, a | :13:55. | :14:01. | |
word I can't abide, is going to be published in a list. Those earning | :14:02. | :14:06. | |
more than ?150,000. The BBC is worried about the safety of some | :14:07. | :14:11. | |
people. I think the abuse levels are now so awful, but whether you are, I | :14:12. | :14:23. | |
can understand that. There is a suggestion here that people are so | :14:24. | :14:26. | |
worried for themselves and their families that they might need to be | :14:27. | :14:32. | |
protected, Ruth. Indeed. I must say, in the general election, there was a | :14:33. | :14:37. | |
lot of abuse potential MPs, which was deeply worrying. It seems to | :14:38. | :14:40. | |
have come into our culture that if you see somebody in the public | :14:41. | :14:45. | |
arena, you can just abuse them. I'm quite horrified by it, actually. | :14:46. | :14:50. | |
What is the BBC meant to do? There has been pressure for the BBC to be | :14:51. | :14:54. | |
more transparent about who gets paid what at a higher level. And I think | :14:55. | :15:00. | |
they are right. This is a public service broadcaster, and we know, | :15:01. | :15:05. | |
for example, how much money some vice chancellors are getting in | :15:06. | :15:07. | |
universities, and they don't like those numbers published because it | :15:08. | :15:11. | |
does them no good at all. It has to happen if you are in a public | :15:12. | :15:15. | |
service. What sort of protection will the BBC offer these people? I | :15:16. | :15:21. | |
can understand why they are doing it. It will cost more money. I am | :15:22. | :15:27. | |
appalled by the online abuse. It will also show the range, which will | :15:28. | :15:34. | |
be interesting. It will. That's it for the Papers for this hour, but | :15:35. | :15:38. | |
don't forget, all the front pages are online on the BBC News website, | :15:39. | :15:47. | |
seven days a week. Each edition is also posted on the iPlayer if you | :15:48. | :15:52. | |
miss it, shortly after we finish. Ruth and Yasmin will be back again | :15:53. | :16:02. | |
at 11:30pm. Next, it is Meet The Author. | :16:03. | :16:07. | |
There isn't a single full stop in Mike McCormack's | :16:08. | :16:09. | |
The story is a monologue that reads like a string of thoughts - | :16:10. | :16:13. | |
sometimes poetic, sometimes rough, often disturbing. | :16:14. | :16:16. | |
And they tell us about one man in one hour, on one day - | :16:17. | :16:20. |