Episode 20 The Phone Hacking Inquiry


Episode 20

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Episode 20. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Rebekah Brooks, and former editor of the News of the World and

:00:03.:00:08.

Downing Street communications director Andy Coulson. It is not

:00:08.:00:11.

possible to state with any certainty whether or not those

:00:11.:00:15.

voice mails were deleted. I know nothing about what Clive Goodman

:00:15.:00:25.
:00:25.:00:29.

did... I would Text Mr Cameron on occasion, like a lot of people...

:00:29.:00:33.

It was a moment of anguish like few others. Milly Dowler was missing,

:00:33.:00:38.

her mum called her mobile phone, expecting to hear a message saying

:00:38.:00:42.

the mailbox was full. I rang her phone and it clicked through on to

:00:42.:00:49.

her voice mail, so I heard her voice. I was just, she has picked

:00:49.:00:55.

up her voicemails, she is a live! The Guardian said it was the News

:00:55.:00:59.

of the World that deleted messages to free up space for more. This was

:00:59.:01:02.

the week that saw two former News of the World editors, one of whom

:01:02.:01:06.

he became the top spin-doctor for the Prime Minister, another who

:01:06.:01:10.

counts herself as a friend of David Cameron, appearing at the inquiry.

:01:10.:01:13.

But before the appearance of Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks at the

:01:13.:01:18.

end of the week, the inquiry heard about a Metropolitan Police

:01:18.:01:22.

investigation which was intended to get to the truth about Milly

:01:22.:01:26.

Dowler's voicemail. As proceedings started on day 67, some facts

:01:27.:01:32.

needed little explaining. This report into the findings of the

:01:32.:01:35.

explanation -- investigation does not go into the detail about Milly

:01:36.:01:39.

Dowler's telephone being hacked. It is public knowledge that this is

:01:39.:01:42.

the case, and I can confirm that there is evidence to support the

:01:42.:01:47.

fact that it happened. But have voicemail system wiped messages on

:01:47.:01:53.

her phone after they had been there for 72 hours. The Met concluded...

:01:53.:01:57.

Milly Dowler's mother's call is likely to have been made when one

:01:57.:02:01.

of the previous messages had been automatically deleted. The

:02:01.:02:04.

telephone provider has also confirmed that when the voicemail

:02:04.:02:09.

box was full, the automated message would be heard, and once messages

:02:09.:02:15.

had started to drop off the personal voicemail greeting, this

:02:15.:02:20.

would have come into effect. did journalists delete voice mails

:02:20.:02:25.

later on? The verdict from the Met was... Taking all of the

:02:25.:02:30.

information into account, it is not possible to state with certainty

:02:30.:02:37.

whether Milly Dowler's first males were or were not deleted. -- voice

:02:37.:02:42.

mails. Two messages are believed to have been missing. When trying to

:02:42.:02:52.
:02:52.:02:54.

interpret the and -- the evidence, it is necessarily important to

:02:54.:03:01.

consider the lack of complete data. Breaching a definitive conclusion

:03:01.:03:08.

is not and may never be possible. - - reaching. News International

:03:08.:03:12.

repeated its apology to the Milly Dowler family for the hacking of

:03:12.:03:18.

the voice mail, and The Guardian explained... Our error, as we

:03:18.:03:20.

acknowledged and corrected last December, was to have written about

:03:20.:03:25.

the cause of the deletions as a fact, rather than as the belief of

:03:25.:03:30.

several people involved in the case. We regret that. And the barrister

:03:30.:03:33.

for the victims read a statement from Milly Dowler's family, wishing

:03:33.:03:37.

the police had done more about the actions of the News of the World.

:03:37.:03:42.

If Surrey police have prosecuted his activity in 2002, then the

:03:42.:03:45.

position would have been very different, and perhaps countless

:03:45.:03:48.

others might also have avoided having their private messages

:03:48.:03:54.

hacked into by the News of the World. Police neglect and deference

:03:54.:03:58.

meant that it took the relentless efforts of one journalist to

:03:58.:04:03.

uncover what the police knew had gone on. The News of the World is

:04:03.:04:05.

of course history, but unlike so many other editors who have come

:04:05.:04:09.

here, this one had something of a success story to talk about. The

:04:09.:04:14.

Daily Mail's online edition boasts more than 5.5 million readers every

:04:14.:04:18.

day. In the 1980s, when they deregulated the City, it gave the

:04:18.:04:22.

City a chance to compete around the world for financial business, and

:04:22.:04:27.

it did so fantastically. In a way, this is the chance for Fleet Street

:04:27.:04:33.

to compete with a one else in the world. -- with everyone else in the

:04:33.:04:37.

world. The home of the Internet is America, the biggest news providers

:04:37.:04:41.

are American. He warned that that chance to compete could be stifled

:04:41.:04:47.

by too much regulation. How far is the state willing to go to compel

:04:47.:04:52.

private individuals and curtail their freedom of speech? I am

:04:52.:04:56.

suggesting that in the real world, when it comes to a point of

:04:56.:05:06.

principle, it would not be a prize that the public was willing to pay.

:05:06.:05:10.

You're asking me, how do we regulate the Internet? My question

:05:10.:05:14.

is, do we need to regulate the Internet, any more than you need to

:05:14.:05:17.

have a policeman standing in the corner of every pub watching what

:05:17.:05:26.

everyone says? On the next day, Lord Leveson started with a warning,

:05:26.:05:31.

a warning with potential political ramifications. I am not so naive

:05:31.:05:34.

that I do not understand that there are elements of what I am doing

:05:35.:05:38.

which are likely to be of party political interest. I have

:05:38.:05:41.

absolutely no intention of allowing the inquiry to be drawn into such a

:05:41.:05:47.

debate, and will vigorously resist any attempt to do so. But even

:05:47.:05:51.

staying out of political rowers can have a political impact. He made it

:05:51.:05:55.

clear he would not rule on breaches of the Ministerial Code, so he

:05:55.:05:58.

would not be deciding whether this man, the Culture Secretary, Jeremy

:05:58.:06:04.

Hunt, handled News Corporation's bid for control of BSkyB properly.

:06:04.:06:09.

On the face of it, that sounds helpful to David Cameron, but it

:06:09.:06:13.

could put more pressure on Downing Street to get its own adviser on

:06:13.:06:16.

the Ministerial Code to investigate Jeremy Hunt. And there was no

:06:16.:06:20.

comfortable passage for Rupert Murdoch, as the inquiry barrister

:06:20.:06:24.

reflected on the fact that Mr Murdoch could not recall a key

:06:24.:06:29.

meeting with Margaret Thatcher in 1981, as he was battling for

:06:29.:06:34.

ownership of the Times newspapers. One has to question whether this is

:06:34.:06:37.

a selective amnesia. Mr Murdoch told us in evidence that he did not

:06:37.:06:44.

enjoy frequent encounters with Baroness Thatcher, not merely with

:06:44.:06:47.

-- would be selective amnesia appear to be convenient, but

:06:47.:06:51.

inferences might be drawn as to Mr Murdoch's intentions in seeking to

:06:51.:06:55.

meet with the Prime Minister in 1981. Furthermore, this issue is

:06:55.:07:00.

capable of having a bearing on Mr Murdoch's integrity. It was another

:07:00.:07:03.

reminder of the power of this inquiry to shape how people are

:07:03.:07:10.

perceived, to shape their reputations. Next up, man has been

:07:10.:07:16.

-- who has been a top editor, as well as a top adviser to David

:07:16.:07:21.

Cameron - Andy Coulson. Mr Coulson had to resign from the News of the

:07:21.:07:24.

World after a report was sent to jail for phone hacking. But he was

:07:24.:07:28.

not out of work for long, David Cameron subsequently hiring him to

:07:28.:07:34.

work for him. Was the Chancellor given an easy ride over a rather

:07:34.:07:38.

awkward story for him in the News of the World? The inquiry's

:07:38.:07:42.

barrister suggested a favourable slant in the paper's editorial.

:07:42.:07:48.

But... I would say this, that is the leader column of the News of

:07:48.:07:51.

the World, and as much as I would love to say that the leaders that I

:07:51.:07:54.

wrote were the most read part of the newspaper, I think I can safely

:07:54.:08:00.

say that they were not. The front page I don't think in any way can

:08:00.:08:07.

be described as career enhancing for George Osborne. The idea that

:08:07.:08:11.

we somehow or other went easy on him I think is ridiculous, when you

:08:11.:08:16.

look at the paper. Not that this was all about the Conservatives.

:08:16.:08:20.

When you resigned from the opposition as editor of the News of

:08:20.:08:27.

the World, did you receive any commiserations from Mr Blair?

:08:27.:08:37.

some time later, yes. Mr Brown? Mr Cameron? I do not remember doing

:08:37.:08:44.

so. But the key questions were about what he was asked, by whom,

:08:44.:08:54.

and when. You say in paragraph 31 of your statement, this is the

:08:54.:08:58.

conversation you have just been referring to - He, Mr Cameron, also

:08:58.:09:03.

asked me about the Clive Goodman case. Can you remember the gist of

:09:03.:09:08.

your answer? I was able to repeat what I had said publicly, that I

:09:08.:09:13.

knew nothing about the Clive Goodman and Glenn Mulcaire case in

:09:13.:09:19.

terms of what they did. But what about much later, when this story

:09:19.:09:24.

raised concerns that it wasn't just Clive Goodman hacking phones?

:09:24.:09:30.

publication of the piece in The Guardian in July 2009, were any

:09:30.:09:35.

further assurances sought by Mr Cameron or anyone else on his

:09:35.:09:40.

behalf in relation to the matter of Clive Goodman and Glenn Mulcaire?

:09:40.:09:46.

Not that I recall. There was something David Cameron didn't know

:09:46.:09:51.

- because Mr Coulson did not tell him or anyone else, that he had

:09:51.:09:56.

shares in News Corporation. He continued to hold the stock even as

:09:56.:10:00.

the Government had to decide whether to let News Corp buy those

:10:00.:10:05.

BSkyB shares it did not already own, the decision in which Andy Coulson

:10:05.:10:09.

said he played no part. Do you know the approximate value of these

:10:09.:10:13.

stocks? I did not throw out any time in opposition or in government,

:10:13.:10:19.

but in preparation for day, -- for today, I have checked, and their

:10:19.:10:24.

gross value is around �40,000. I am not clear what deductions will come

:10:24.:10:31.

from that. Why do you think you overlooked them? This is by way of

:10:31.:10:38.

explanation, not excuse. My job in opposition was a busy one, my job

:10:38.:10:44.

in government was busier still, and they did not take the time to pay

:10:44.:10:50.

close attention to my own circumstances in this regard, and I

:10:50.:10:53.

should have done. There were also revelations about what Andy Coulson

:10:53.:10:56.

was allowed to do despite not having the highest level of

:10:56.:11:06.
:11:06.:11:17.

Did you ever attend meetings of the National Security Council? Yes. My

:11:17.:11:23.

understanding is that they s sea level allows occasional access to

:11:23.:11:33.
:11:33.:11:35.

top-secret paper work -- the SC level. Andy Coulson also spelt out

:11:35.:11:45.
:11:45.:11:50.

his relationship with Frederic Michel. He had a hand in the

:11:51.:11:55.

organising of a lunch between David Cameron and the former Spanish

:11:55.:12:02.

prime minister. Once in government, I'd do we call talking to him, very

:12:02.:12:09.

briefly in my office, I think. I cannot find a full record of that

:12:09.:12:14.

meeting. It could be he was seeing someone else all in the building,

:12:14.:12:21.

with another meeting and popped in. A Andy Coulson's evidence contained

:12:21.:12:25.

plenty of intriguing titbits, but no jaw-dropping revelations likely

:12:25.:12:29.

to cause embarrassment to David Cameron. Mr Coles and insisted

:12:29.:12:33.

there was no grand conspiracy between the Conservative Party and

:12:33.:12:38.

Rupert Murdoch -- Andy Coulson insisted. His evidence did not make

:12:38.:12:43.

any reference to the phone hacking scandal, because that is subject to

:12:43.:12:48.

an investigation by the Metropolitan Police. On day 69, it

:12:48.:12:53.

was the turn of Rebekah Brooks, perhaps best thought of as Rupert

:12:53.:12:58.

Murdoch's ambassador for Britain. She became chief executive of the

:12:58.:13:05.

organisation that runs his British newspapers. Robert Jay QC asked

:13:05.:13:08.

whether politicians cameras -- whether politicians commiserated

:13:08.:13:15.

with her when she had to resign. Big you receive messages of support

:13:15.:13:19.

from politicians -- did you receive messages of support from

:13:19.:13:26.

politicians, in 20th July 11 particularly? Yes, some. Directly

:13:26.:13:36.
:13:36.:13:38.

or indirectly? Mainly indirectly. In order to get a fair picture, can

:13:38.:13:45.

you are sisters bike -- can you assist us by saying he you got the

:13:45.:13:54.

message is from? Nothing direct. whether politicians? The variety.

:13:54.:14:03.

Some Tories, a few Labour politicians. Can you be a bit more

:14:03.:14:10.

specific? I am not trying to be evasive. I received indirect

:14:10.:14:19.

messages from Number Ten, number 11, the Home Office, the Foreign Office.

:14:19.:14:24.

So you were talking about Secretary of State, the Prime Minister, the

:14:24.:14:29.

Chancellor of the Exchequer. also people who worked in those

:14:29.:14:36.

offices as well. How about Labour politicians? Like I say, very few

:14:36.:14:43.

Labour politicians cent commiserations. Did Mr Blair sent

:14:43.:14:51.

you won? Yes. Probably not Mr Brown. Now. He was probably getting the

:14:51.:14:58.

bunting out. That's is a reference to the Sun changing allegiances. A

:14:58.:15:04.

pattern emerged throughout her evidence of just how close her

:15:04.:15:08.

relationships were two prime ministers. Tony Blair went to her

:15:08.:15:12.

40th birthday party and David Cameron was in touch with her by

:15:12.:15:21.

text message. He would textual to a dozen times a day? Is that true?

:15:21.:15:27.

Known, thanks to Lee. A handful of times a day? No. I have read this

:15:27.:15:32.

as well, 12 times a day, it is preposterous. One would hope he

:15:32.:15:38.

would have better things to do. And I would hope that I did. I would

:15:38.:15:47.

text Mr Cameron and vice fares that on occasion. Care new give an idea

:15:47.:15:55.

of frequency? -- can you give an idea. Probably more between 20th

:15:55.:15:59.

January 10, maybe during the election campaign, may be slightly

:15:59.:16:09.

more, on average, maybe once a week. The critical time as you say is the

:16:09.:16:15.

election campaign. Can you give an idea about frequency in relation to

:16:15.:16:24.

that period? Maybe twice a week. Everybody wants to know how his

:16:24.:16:34.
:16:34.:16:48.

messages are signed off. Can you help? What was the decision? Answer

:16:48.:16:58.
:16:58.:16:59.

the question. He would sign them off, with his initials mainly.

:16:59.:17:09.
:17:09.:17:09.

Anything else? Occasionally, he would sign them off LOL, lots of

:17:09.:17:13.

love. That was until I told him it meant a laugh out loud. Then he did

:17:13.:17:19.

not do it like that anymore. evidence had a mixture of

:17:19.:17:23.

interesting history and the odd moment that could provoke Esquire

:17:23.:17:30.

of embarrassment in Downing Street. Nothing too politically

:17:30.:17:34.

uncomfortable. The afternoon session was to prove a bit

:17:34.:17:38.

different. A previously unreleased e-mail emerged, sent from Frederic

:17:38.:17:42.

Michel to Rebekah Brooks. In it, he suggested that Jeremy Hunt, the

:17:42.:17:52.
:17:52.:17:54.

Culture Secretary, had a cyst -- had asked for private advice from

:17:54.:18:00.

News Corp to guide his positioning over the issue. Jeremy Hunt has

:18:00.:18:03.

said Frederic Michel has admitted to the inquiry that sometimes when

:18:03.:18:07.

he suggested he was communicating with the Culture Secretary, he was

:18:07.:18:12.

actually talking to the now resigned former adviser Adam Smith.

:18:12.:18:19.

Mr Hunt says that when he appears here, he feels he will be

:18:19.:18:22.

vindicated. Rebekah Brooks told the inquiry she had spoken about the

:18:22.:18:28.

BSkyB deal with the Chancellor, George Osborne. Did Mr Osborne

:18:28.:18:33.

support News Corp? He never said so. He never said explicitly that.

:18:33.:18:39.

However, I think one of the points we were trying to make about the

:18:39.:18:49.

bid was it that kind of level of investment was coming into their UK,

:18:49.:18:53.

country to what some people were saying, that it would be a bad

:18:53.:18:58.

thing, we thought that in the call centres around the country, there

:18:58.:19:01.

would be a creation of jobs, and we would try to put that argument

:19:01.:19:10.

forward. I think my question was only was he supportive of the bid.

:19:10.:19:15.

And as I said, he never explicitly said said. Can you confirm whether

:19:15.:19:21.

he was on not? He was interested in our organisation. The revelations

:19:21.:19:26.

of the phone hacking scandal eventually make those discussions

:19:26.:19:31.

immaterial. The BSkyB takeover was off. The question returned to their

:19:31.:19:35.

ethics and practice of the Sun newspaper, at one particular story.

:19:35.:19:39.

The news that Gordon Brown's son Fraser suffered from cystic

:19:39.:19:45.

fibrosis. Gordon Brown says -- Gordon Brown suggested then pay-

:19:45.:19:52.

per- got hold of this news by getting hold of medical records. It

:19:52.:19:59.

is a terrible accusation for a prop -- or a former Prime Minister to

:19:59.:20:09.
:20:09.:20:09.

make. Rebekah Brooks said the paper got the story from another parent

:20:09.:20:16.

with a child with cystic fibrosis. She would not give any more

:20:16.:20:18.

information. Gordon Brown and his wife expressed concern that it was

:20:18.:20:23.

still not clear specifically how the Sun obtained details of

:20:23.:20:28.

Fraser's medical condition. So, another week wraps up. Proceedings

:20:28.:20:33.

in the coming weeks will get even more intensively political as

:20:33.:20:38.

politicians themselves start to give evidence in person. Next week,

:20:38.:20:47.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS