
Browse content similar to Episode 20. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
| Line | From | To | |
|---|---|---|---|
Rebekah Brooks, and former editor of the News of the World and | :00:03. | :00:08. | |
Downing Street communications director Andy Coulson. It is not | :00:08. | :00:11. | |
possible to state with any certainty whether or not those | :00:11. | :00:15. | |
voice mails were deleted. I know nothing about what Clive Goodman | :00:15. | :00:25. | |
| :00:25. | :00:29. | ||
did... I would Text Mr Cameron on occasion, like a lot of people... | :00:29. | :00:33. | |
It was a moment of anguish like few others. Milly Dowler was missing, | :00:33. | :00:38. | |
her mum called her mobile phone, expecting to hear a message saying | :00:38. | :00:42. | |
the mailbox was full. I rang her phone and it clicked through on to | :00:42. | :00:49. | |
her voice mail, so I heard her voice. I was just, she has picked | :00:49. | :00:55. | |
up her voicemails, she is a live! The Guardian said it was the News | :00:55. | :00:59. | |
of the World that deleted messages to free up space for more. This was | :00:59. | :01:02. | |
the week that saw two former News of the World editors, one of whom | :01:02. | :01:06. | |
he became the top spin-doctor for the Prime Minister, another who | :01:06. | :01:10. | |
counts herself as a friend of David Cameron, appearing at the inquiry. | :01:10. | :01:13. | |
But before the appearance of Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks at the | :01:13. | :01:18. | |
end of the week, the inquiry heard about a Metropolitan Police | :01:18. | :01:22. | |
investigation which was intended to get to the truth about Milly | :01:22. | :01:26. | |
Dowler's voicemail. As proceedings started on day 67, some facts | :01:27. | :01:32. | |
needed little explaining. This report into the findings of the | :01:32. | :01:35. | |
explanation -- investigation does not go into the detail about Milly | :01:36. | :01:39. | |
Dowler's telephone being hacked. It is public knowledge that this is | :01:39. | :01:42. | |
the case, and I can confirm that there is evidence to support the | :01:42. | :01:47. | |
fact that it happened. But have voicemail system wiped messages on | :01:47. | :01:53. | |
her phone after they had been there for 72 hours. The Met concluded... | :01:53. | :01:57. | |
Milly Dowler's mother's call is likely to have been made when one | :01:57. | :02:01. | |
of the previous messages had been automatically deleted. The | :02:01. | :02:04. | |
telephone provider has also confirmed that when the voicemail | :02:04. | :02:09. | |
box was full, the automated message would be heard, and once messages | :02:09. | :02:15. | |
had started to drop off the personal voicemail greeting, this | :02:15. | :02:20. | |
would have come into effect. did journalists delete voice mails | :02:20. | :02:25. | |
later on? The verdict from the Met was... Taking all of the | :02:25. | :02:30. | |
information into account, it is not possible to state with certainty | :02:30. | :02:37. | |
whether Milly Dowler's first males were or were not deleted. -- voice | :02:37. | :02:42. | |
mails. Two messages are believed to have been missing. When trying to | :02:42. | :02:52. | |
| :02:52. | :02:54. | ||
interpret the and -- the evidence, it is necessarily important to | :02:54. | :03:01. | |
consider the lack of complete data. Breaching a definitive conclusion | :03:01. | :03:08. | |
is not and may never be possible. - - reaching. News International | :03:08. | :03:12. | |
repeated its apology to the Milly Dowler family for the hacking of | :03:12. | :03:18. | |
the voice mail, and The Guardian explained... Our error, as we | :03:18. | :03:20. | |
acknowledged and corrected last December, was to have written about | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
the cause of the deletions as a fact, rather than as the belief of | :03:25. | :03:30. | |
several people involved in the case. We regret that. And the barrister | :03:30. | :03:33. | |
for the victims read a statement from Milly Dowler's family, wishing | :03:33. | :03:37. | |
the police had done more about the actions of the News of the World. | :03:37. | :03:42. | |
If Surrey police have prosecuted his activity in 2002, then the | :03:42. | :03:45. | |
position would have been very different, and perhaps countless | :03:45. | :03:48. | |
others might also have avoided having their private messages | :03:48. | :03:54. | |
hacked into by the News of the World. Police neglect and deference | :03:54. | :03:58. | |
meant that it took the relentless efforts of one journalist to | :03:58. | :04:03. | |
uncover what the police knew had gone on. The News of the World is | :04:03. | :04:05. | |
of course history, but unlike so many other editors who have come | :04:05. | :04:09. | |
here, this one had something of a success story to talk about. The | :04:09. | :04:14. | |
Daily Mail's online edition boasts more than 5.5 million readers every | :04:14. | :04:18. | |
day. In the 1980s, when they deregulated the City, it gave the | :04:18. | :04:22. | |
City a chance to compete around the world for financial business, and | :04:22. | :04:27. | |
it did so fantastically. In a way, this is the chance for Fleet Street | :04:27. | :04:33. | |
to compete with a one else in the world. -- with everyone else in the | :04:33. | :04:37. | |
world. The home of the Internet is America, the biggest news providers | :04:37. | :04:41. | |
are American. He warned that that chance to compete could be stifled | :04:41. | :04:47. | |
by too much regulation. How far is the state willing to go to compel | :04:47. | :04:52. | |
private individuals and curtail their freedom of speech? I am | :04:52. | :04:56. | |
suggesting that in the real world, when it comes to a point of | :04:56. | :05:06. | |
principle, it would not be a prize that the public was willing to pay. | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
You're asking me, how do we regulate the Internet? My question | :05:10. | :05:14. | |
is, do we need to regulate the Internet, any more than you need to | :05:14. | :05:17. | |
have a policeman standing in the corner of every pub watching what | :05:17. | :05:26. | |
everyone says? On the next day, Lord Leveson started with a warning, | :05:26. | :05:31. | |
a warning with potential political ramifications. I am not so naive | :05:31. | :05:34. | |
that I do not understand that there are elements of what I am doing | :05:35. | :05:38. | |
which are likely to be of party political interest. I have | :05:38. | :05:41. | |
absolutely no intention of allowing the inquiry to be drawn into such a | :05:41. | :05:47. | |
debate, and will vigorously resist any attempt to do so. But even | :05:47. | :05:51. | |
staying out of political rowers can have a political impact. He made it | :05:51. | :05:55. | |
clear he would not rule on breaches of the Ministerial Code, so he | :05:55. | :05:58. | |
would not be deciding whether this man, the Culture Secretary, Jeremy | :05:58. | :06:04. | |
Hunt, handled News Corporation's bid for control of BSkyB properly. | :06:04. | :06:09. | |
On the face of it, that sounds helpful to David Cameron, but it | :06:09. | :06:13. | |
could put more pressure on Downing Street to get its own adviser on | :06:13. | :06:16. | |
the Ministerial Code to investigate Jeremy Hunt. And there was no | :06:16. | :06:20. | |
comfortable passage for Rupert Murdoch, as the inquiry barrister | :06:20. | :06:24. | |
reflected on the fact that Mr Murdoch could not recall a key | :06:24. | :06:29. | |
meeting with Margaret Thatcher in 1981, as he was battling for | :06:29. | :06:34. | |
ownership of the Times newspapers. One has to question whether this is | :06:34. | :06:37. | |
a selective amnesia. Mr Murdoch told us in evidence that he did not | :06:37. | :06:44. | |
enjoy frequent encounters with Baroness Thatcher, not merely with | :06:44. | :06:47. | |
-- would be selective amnesia appear to be convenient, but | :06:47. | :06:51. | |
inferences might be drawn as to Mr Murdoch's intentions in seeking to | :06:51. | :06:55. | |
meet with the Prime Minister in 1981. Furthermore, this issue is | :06:55. | :07:00. | |
capable of having a bearing on Mr Murdoch's integrity. It was another | :07:00. | :07:03. | |
reminder of the power of this inquiry to shape how people are | :07:03. | :07:10. | |
perceived, to shape their reputations. Next up, man has been | :07:10. | :07:16. | |
-- who has been a top editor, as well as a top adviser to David | :07:16. | :07:21. | |
Cameron - Andy Coulson. Mr Coulson had to resign from the News of the | :07:21. | :07:24. | |
World after a report was sent to jail for phone hacking. But he was | :07:24. | :07:28. | |
not out of work for long, David Cameron subsequently hiring him to | :07:28. | :07:34. | |
work for him. Was the Chancellor given an easy ride over a rather | :07:34. | :07:38. | |
awkward story for him in the News of the World? The inquiry's | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
barrister suggested a favourable slant in the paper's editorial. | :07:42. | :07:48. | |
But... I would say this, that is the leader column of the News of | :07:48. | :07:51. | |
the World, and as much as I would love to say that the leaders that I | :07:51. | :07:54. | |
wrote were the most read part of the newspaper, I think I can safely | :07:54. | :08:00. | |
say that they were not. The front page I don't think in any way can | :08:00. | :08:07. | |
be described as career enhancing for George Osborne. The idea that | :08:07. | :08:11. | |
we somehow or other went easy on him I think is ridiculous, when you | :08:11. | :08:16. | |
look at the paper. Not that this was all about the Conservatives. | :08:16. | :08:20. | |
When you resigned from the opposition as editor of the News of | :08:20. | :08:27. | |
the World, did you receive any commiserations from Mr Blair? | :08:27. | :08:37. | |
some time later, yes. Mr Brown? Mr Cameron? I do not remember doing | :08:37. | :08:44. | |
so. But the key questions were about what he was asked, by whom, | :08:44. | :08:54. | |
and when. You say in paragraph 31 of your statement, this is the | :08:54. | :08:58. | |
conversation you have just been referring to - He, Mr Cameron, also | :08:58. | :09:03. | |
asked me about the Clive Goodman case. Can you remember the gist of | :09:03. | :09:08. | |
your answer? I was able to repeat what I had said publicly, that I | :09:08. | :09:13. | |
knew nothing about the Clive Goodman and Glenn Mulcaire case in | :09:13. | :09:19. | |
terms of what they did. But what about much later, when this story | :09:19. | :09:24. | |
raised concerns that it wasn't just Clive Goodman hacking phones? | :09:24. | :09:30. | |
publication of the piece in The Guardian in July 2009, were any | :09:30. | :09:35. | |
further assurances sought by Mr Cameron or anyone else on his | :09:35. | :09:40. | |
behalf in relation to the matter of Clive Goodman and Glenn Mulcaire? | :09:40. | :09:46. | |
Not that I recall. There was something David Cameron didn't know | :09:46. | :09:51. | |
- because Mr Coulson did not tell him or anyone else, that he had | :09:51. | :09:56. | |
shares in News Corporation. He continued to hold the stock even as | :09:56. | :10:00. | |
the Government had to decide whether to let News Corp buy those | :10:00. | :10:05. | |
BSkyB shares it did not already own, the decision in which Andy Coulson | :10:05. | :10:09. | |
said he played no part. Do you know the approximate value of these | :10:09. | :10:13. | |
stocks? I did not throw out any time in opposition or in government, | :10:13. | :10:19. | |
but in preparation for day, -- for today, I have checked, and their | :10:19. | :10:24. | |
gross value is around �40,000. I am not clear what deductions will come | :10:24. | :10:31. | |
from that. Why do you think you overlooked them? This is by way of | :10:31. | :10:38. | |
explanation, not excuse. My job in opposition was a busy one, my job | :10:38. | :10:44. | |
in government was busier still, and they did not take the time to pay | :10:44. | :10:50. | |
close attention to my own circumstances in this regard, and I | :10:50. | :10:53. | |
should have done. There were also revelations about what Andy Coulson | :10:53. | :10:56. | |
was allowed to do despite not having the highest level of | :10:56. | :11:06. | |
| :11:06. | :11:17. | ||
Did you ever attend meetings of the National Security Council? Yes. My | :11:17. | :11:23. | |
understanding is that they s sea level allows occasional access to | :11:23. | :11:33. | |
| :11:33. | :11:35. | ||
top-secret paper work -- the SC level. Andy Coulson also spelt out | :11:35. | :11:45. | |
| :11:45. | :11:50. | ||
his relationship with Frederic Michel. He had a hand in the | :11:51. | :11:55. | |
organising of a lunch between David Cameron and the former Spanish | :11:55. | :12:02. | |
prime minister. Once in government, I'd do we call talking to him, very | :12:02. | :12:09. | |
briefly in my office, I think. I cannot find a full record of that | :12:09. | :12:14. | |
meeting. It could be he was seeing someone else all in the building, | :12:14. | :12:21. | |
with another meeting and popped in. A Andy Coulson's evidence contained | :12:21. | :12:25. | |
plenty of intriguing titbits, but no jaw-dropping revelations likely | :12:25. | :12:29. | |
to cause embarrassment to David Cameron. Mr Coles and insisted | :12:29. | :12:33. | |
there was no grand conspiracy between the Conservative Party and | :12:33. | :12:38. | |
Rupert Murdoch -- Andy Coulson insisted. His evidence did not make | :12:38. | :12:43. | |
any reference to the phone hacking scandal, because that is subject to | :12:43. | :12:48. | |
an investigation by the Metropolitan Police. On day 69, it | :12:48. | :12:53. | |
was the turn of Rebekah Brooks, perhaps best thought of as Rupert | :12:53. | :12:58. | |
Murdoch's ambassador for Britain. She became chief executive of the | :12:58. | :13:05. | |
organisation that runs his British newspapers. Robert Jay QC asked | :13:05. | :13:08. | |
whether politicians cameras -- whether politicians commiserated | :13:08. | :13:15. | |
with her when she had to resign. Big you receive messages of support | :13:15. | :13:19. | |
from politicians -- did you receive messages of support from | :13:19. | :13:26. | |
politicians, in 20th July 11 particularly? Yes, some. Directly | :13:26. | :13:36. | |
| :13:36. | :13:38. | ||
or indirectly? Mainly indirectly. In order to get a fair picture, can | :13:38. | :13:45. | |
you are sisters bike -- can you assist us by saying he you got the | :13:45. | :13:54. | |
message is from? Nothing direct. whether politicians? The variety. | :13:54. | :14:03. | |
Some Tories, a few Labour politicians. Can you be a bit more | :14:03. | :14:10. | |
specific? I am not trying to be evasive. I received indirect | :14:10. | :14:19. | |
messages from Number Ten, number 11, the Home Office, the Foreign Office. | :14:19. | :14:24. | |
So you were talking about Secretary of State, the Prime Minister, the | :14:24. | :14:29. | |
Chancellor of the Exchequer. also people who worked in those | :14:29. | :14:36. | |
offices as well. How about Labour politicians? Like I say, very few | :14:36. | :14:43. | |
Labour politicians cent commiserations. Did Mr Blair sent | :14:43. | :14:51. | |
you won? Yes. Probably not Mr Brown. Now. He was probably getting the | :14:51. | :14:58. | |
bunting out. That's is a reference to the Sun changing allegiances. A | :14:58. | :15:04. | |
pattern emerged throughout her evidence of just how close her | :15:04. | :15:08. | |
relationships were two prime ministers. Tony Blair went to her | :15:08. | :15:12. | |
40th birthday party and David Cameron was in touch with her by | :15:12. | :15:21. | |
text message. He would textual to a dozen times a day? Is that true? | :15:21. | :15:27. | |
Known, thanks to Lee. A handful of times a day? No. I have read this | :15:27. | :15:32. | |
as well, 12 times a day, it is preposterous. One would hope he | :15:32. | :15:38. | |
would have better things to do. And I would hope that I did. I would | :15:38. | :15:47. | |
text Mr Cameron and vice fares that on occasion. Care new give an idea | :15:47. | :15:55. | |
of frequency? -- can you give an idea. Probably more between 20th | :15:55. | :15:59. | |
January 10, maybe during the election campaign, may be slightly | :15:59. | :16:09. | |
more, on average, maybe once a week. The critical time as you say is the | :16:09. | :16:15. | |
election campaign. Can you give an idea about frequency in relation to | :16:15. | :16:24. | |
that period? Maybe twice a week. Everybody wants to know how his | :16:24. | :16:34. | |
| :16:34. | :16:48. | ||
messages are signed off. Can you help? What was the decision? Answer | :16:48. | :16:58. | |
| :16:58. | :16:59. | ||
the question. He would sign them off, with his initials mainly. | :16:59. | :17:09. | |
| :17:09. | :17:09. | ||
Anything else? Occasionally, he would sign them off LOL, lots of | :17:09. | :17:13. | |
love. That was until I told him it meant a laugh out loud. Then he did | :17:13. | :17:19. | |
not do it like that anymore. evidence had a mixture of | :17:19. | :17:23. | |
interesting history and the odd moment that could provoke Esquire | :17:23. | :17:30. | |
of embarrassment in Downing Street. Nothing too politically | :17:30. | :17:34. | |
uncomfortable. The afternoon session was to prove a bit | :17:34. | :17:38. | |
different. A previously unreleased e-mail emerged, sent from Frederic | :17:38. | :17:42. | |
Michel to Rebekah Brooks. In it, he suggested that Jeremy Hunt, the | :17:42. | :17:52. | |
| :17:52. | :17:54. | ||
Culture Secretary, had a cyst -- had asked for private advice from | :17:54. | :18:00. | |
News Corp to guide his positioning over the issue. Jeremy Hunt has | :18:00. | :18:03. | |
said Frederic Michel has admitted to the inquiry that sometimes when | :18:03. | :18:07. | |
he suggested he was communicating with the Culture Secretary, he was | :18:07. | :18:12. | |
actually talking to the now resigned former adviser Adam Smith. | :18:12. | :18:19. | |
Mr Hunt says that when he appears here, he feels he will be | :18:19. | :18:22. | |
vindicated. Rebekah Brooks told the inquiry she had spoken about the | :18:22. | :18:28. | |
BSkyB deal with the Chancellor, George Osborne. Did Mr Osborne | :18:28. | :18:33. | |
support News Corp? He never said so. He never said explicitly that. | :18:33. | :18:39. | |
However, I think one of the points we were trying to make about the | :18:39. | :18:49. | |
bid was it that kind of level of investment was coming into their UK, | :18:49. | :18:53. | |
country to what some people were saying, that it would be a bad | :18:53. | :18:58. | |
thing, we thought that in the call centres around the country, there | :18:58. | :19:01. | |
would be a creation of jobs, and we would try to put that argument | :19:01. | :19:10. | |
forward. I think my question was only was he supportive of the bid. | :19:10. | :19:15. | |
And as I said, he never explicitly said said. Can you confirm whether | :19:15. | :19:21. | |
he was on not? He was interested in our organisation. The revelations | :19:21. | :19:26. | |
of the phone hacking scandal eventually make those discussions | :19:26. | :19:31. | |
immaterial. The BSkyB takeover was off. The question returned to their | :19:31. | :19:35. | |
ethics and practice of the Sun newspaper, at one particular story. | :19:35. | :19:39. | |
The news that Gordon Brown's son Fraser suffered from cystic | :19:39. | :19:45. | |
fibrosis. Gordon Brown says -- Gordon Brown suggested then pay- | :19:45. | :19:52. | |
per- got hold of this news by getting hold of medical records. It | :19:52. | :19:59. | |
is a terrible accusation for a prop -- or a former Prime Minister to | :19:59. | :20:09. | |
| :20:09. | :20:09. | ||
make. Rebekah Brooks said the paper got the story from another parent | :20:09. | :20:16. | |
with a child with cystic fibrosis. She would not give any more | :20:16. | :20:18. | |
information. Gordon Brown and his wife expressed concern that it was | :20:18. | :20:23. | |
still not clear specifically how the Sun obtained details of | :20:23. | :20:28. | |
Fraser's medical condition. So, another week wraps up. Proceedings | :20:28. | :20:33. | |
in the coming weeks will get even more intensively political as | :20:33. | :20:38. | |
politicians themselves start to give evidence in person. Next week, | :20:38. | :20:47. |