10/11/2015 Victoria Derbyshire

Hello it's Tuesday, it's 9.15, I'm Joanna Gosling,

The mum of a boy who died in hospital after

a catastrophic failure tells us how she can never trust a doctor again.

We'll speak to Nicola Adcock in her first BBC interview after a doctor

was found guilty of the manslaughter by gross negligence of her son Jack.

David Cameron says EU reform is not an impossible task.

The Prime Minister is setting out his plans to renegotiate

And could Russian athletes really be banned from next year's

Hello and welcome to the programme - we're on BBC Two and the BBC News

As we go on air this morning, the Prime Minister is talking

about why he thinks the European Union should be reformed.

He started talking a few minutes ago and we will

David Cameron says he is committed to negotiating a "better deal" with

the EU before a referendum in 2017 which will allow us to decide

if we should stay or leave the union.

Mr Cameron has said he wants the UK to stay in a reformed EU, but he has

not ruled out leaving if he cannot secure the change he wants.

So this morning he is revealing a number of key points he wants to

Protection of the single market for Britain

Exempting Britain from "ever-closer union" and bolstering

Restricting EU migrants' access to in-work benefits.

We'll get some reaction from our political guru Norman Smith.

But let's just see what else David Cameron has to say.

We know that the bedrock of our Security is a strong economy.

Something any nation must have to succeed in the 21st century. It is

also why, despite all the pressures on the public finances, we have

guaranteed to spend 2% on defence and 0.7% of our gross national

income on overseas aid. With that money we are able to equip our Armed

Forces with two brand-new aircraft carriers, double our fleet of

drones, buy new fighter aircraft and submarines as well as investing in

our special forces. We are doing all of these things to protect our

economic and national interests. That is the prism through which I

approach our membership of the European Union. Taking the tough

decisions, making the difficult arguments, addressing the issues

that no-one wants to talk about and protecting and advancing our

economic and national security. Like most British people, I come to this

question with a frame of mind which is practical not emotional, had not

hard. I know that some of our European partners may find that

disappointing about Britain, at that is who we are, that is how we have

always been as a nation. Rigorously practical, obstinately

down-to-earth, we are natural debunkers. We see the European Union

as a means to an end, not an end in itself. Europe where necessary,

national where possible, as our Dutch friends put it. Away to

amplify our national prosperity, like Nato or the IMF. We understand

that there is a close relationship between the security and prosperity

of the continent to which our island is tied geographically and our own

security and prosperity. In the week when we commemorate the end of the

Great War, and in the year when we have marked the 70th anniversary of

the liberation of Europe, how can we not? Britain has contributed in full

measure to the freedom that Europe's nations enjoy today. Across

the continent, in stone cold cemeteries, lie the remains of

British servicemen who crossed the Channel to help subjugated nations

throw off the tyrant's yoke and return liberty to her rightful place

on what Churchill called this noble continent. We continue to play our

full role in security, globally, fighting Ebola in West Africa,

flying policing missions over the fighting Ebola in West Africa,

Nato operations in Europe, saving lives

Nato operations in Europe, saving smuggling rings in the

Mediterranean, spending ?1.1 billion smuggling rings in the

on aid to Syria, Lebanon and Jordan - more than any other European

nation. Britain has always been an engaged nation, because we know that

engagement is the best way to protect and advance our economic and

national security. So today, as we confront fresh threats

national security. So today, as we to our country, I am in no doubt

that for to our country, I am in no doubt

question is not just a matter of economic security, but of national

security, too. Not just a matter of jobs and trade, but of the safety

and security of our nation. Equally, when Europe and the European Union

accounts for almost half of our trade, it matters for our economic

security that the European Union is competitive and succeeds in

promoting prosperity for its members. Just as it

promoting prosperity for its that while we are not part

promoting prosperity for its euro, and in my view never will be,

the Eurozone is able to deal with its problems and to succeed. If it

fails to do so, we will certainly not be immune from the

side-effects. That is why almost three years ago I set out the case

for reform, reform which will benefit Britain and in my view the

entire EU. I was clear that Britain gains advantages

entire EU. I was clear that Britain of the EU. But I was also clear that

there are some of the EU. But I was also clear that

need to be addressed. Lytic of the EU. But I was also clear that

leadership team confronting these problems, not wishing them away. If

we ignore them, history teaches us they will only

we ignore them, history teaches us explain what I mean. In my Bloomberg

speech, almost three years ago, I said the European Union faced three

major challenges. First heard all the problems in the Eurozone which

need to be fixed, requiring fundamental changes. Second, a

crisis of European competitiveness, as other nations across the world

race ahead and Europe risks being left behind. Third, the gap between

the EU and its citizens, which has grown dramatically in recent years,

and which represents a lack of democratic accountability and

consent which is felt acutely in Britain. These three challenges are

as critical now as when I first set them out. Today I would add a

fourth. As we have seen spectacularly across Europe with the

questions posed by the migration crisis, countries need greater

controls to manage the pressures of people coming in. While in Britain

we are not part of the Schengen no borders agreement and so we have

been able to set out our own approach and take refugees by Ripley

from the camps, we do need some additional measures to address wider

abuses of the right to free movement within Europe and to reduce the very

high flow of people coming to Britain from across all of Europe.

So the changes we are arguing for our substantial, but they have a

very clear purpose - to address the four key challenges which are vital

to his access of the European Union and to maintain and advance the

UK's economic and national security within it. Let me explain each of

them in turn. First, it is in all of our interests for the Eurozone to

have the right governance and struck choose to secure successful currency

for the long-term. -- structures. Written understands that and we will

not stand in the way of those developments as long as we can be

sure that there are mechanisms in place to make sure that our candy

interests are fully protected. There are today two sorts of members of

the European Union. Euro members and non-euro members. The changes which

the Eurozone will need to implement will have profound implications for

both types of member. Non-euro members like Britain which are

outside the Eurozone need certain safeguards in order to protect the

single market and our ability to decide its rules and to make sure

that we face neither discrimination nor additional costs from the

integration of the Eurozone. Because the European Union and the Eurozone

are not the same thing. Those of us brought in the EU but outside the

Eurozone need that accepted. We need a model which works for Britain and

for any other non-euro members. This should be perfectly possible. The

European Union is a family of democratic nations whose original

foundation was and remains the common market. There is no reason

why the single currency and the single market should share the same

boundary any more than the single market and Schengen. So the EU needs

flexibility to accommodate both of those inside and outside the

Eurozone. Both those who are contemplating much closer economic

and political integration and those countries like Britain which will

never embrace that goal. This is a matter of cardinal importance for

the United Kingdom. Because if the European Union were to evolve into a

single currency club, where those outside the single currency are

pushed aside and overruled, then it would no longer be a club for us. We

need this issue fixed so that the UK is not obliged to fight a series of

running battles which would only corrode trust amongst member states.

We have to make sure that there is appointed to being in the EU but in

the Eurozone and that that position does not turn a country into a brawl

taker instead of a rule maker. And now is the time to do that. As part

of our negotiation, I am asking European leaders to meet clear and

binding principles which protect Britain and other non-euro countries

and a safeguard mechanism to make sure those principles are respected

and enforce. Those principles should include the following. Recognition

that the EU is a union with more than one currency, that there should

be no discrimination and disadvantage for any business on the

basis of the currency of their country. That the integrity of the

single market must be protected. That as the Eurozone moves ahead,

any changes it decides to make, the creation of a banking union for

instance, must be voluntary for non-Europeans is, never compulsory.

That taxpayers in non-euro countries should never bear the cost for

operations to support the euro as a currency. And that just as financial

stability and supervision has become a key area of competence for the

Eurozone, institutions like the ECB, so, financial stability and

supervision is also a key area of competence for national institutions

like the Bank of England for non-euro members. And of course,

that any issues which affect all member states must be discussed and

decided by all member states. Second, we want a European Union

which adds to our competitiveness, not detracts from it. We have

already made good progress here since my speech at Bloomberg.

Agility of proposals under the new commission have fallen by 18%, with

more regulation set to be repealed this year than in the whole of the

previous commission. We have proposals for a M its union which

will help get finance into the hands of entrepreneurs and growing

businesses. The new pounds to deepen the single market in digital will

mean new opportunities for millions of British businesses to operate

more easily anywhere in Europe. Changes we secured just last month

will mean that British tourists will no longer incur roaming charges when

using mobile phones or have to pay extortionate credit card fees. Just

last month the European Commission published a new trade strategy which

reflects the agenda which Britain has been championing for years,

including pursuing massive trade deals with America, China, Japan and

RCM. We know the benefits free trade can bring. Recent deals including

one with career are already saving UK consumers ?5 billion every year.

They have helped UK car exports for instance to Korea increase fivefold.

There is much more we can do. For all that we have achieved in

stemming the flow of new regulations, the burden from

existing regulation is still too high. Two years ago we secured the

first ever real terms cut in the EU budget. It is now time to do the

same with EU regulation. So we need a target to cut the total burden on

business. At the same time we need to bring together all the different

proposals, promises and agreements on the single market, on trade, on

cutting regulation, all together into one clear commitment which

rights competitiveness into the DNA of the whole European Union. Third,

we need to deal with the disillusionment which many of

Europe's citizens feel towards the European Union as an institution.

These concerns are not just in Britain but Stross and perhaps

greater here than anywhere else in the European Union today. We have

already passed a law to guarantee that no powers can transfer from

Britain to Brussels ever again without the explicit consent of the

British people in a referendum. But if Britain is to remain in the EU,

we need to do more. It boil stand to this. We are a proud, independent

nation. We intend to stay that way. So we need to be honest about this.

Commit and in the treaty to an ever closer union is not a commitment

which should apply any longer to Britain. We do not believe in it, we

do not subscribe to it. We have a different vision for Europe. We

believe in a flexible union of free member states who share treaties and

institutions, working together in a spirit of co-operation to advance

our shared prosperity and protect our people from threats to security

weather from home or abroad. And of course continuing in time and only

with unanimous agreement to welcome new countries into the EU. This

vision of flexibility and co-operation is not the same as

those who want to build an ever closer political union, but it is

just as valid. If we can't persuade our European partners to share this

vision for all, we certainly need to find a way to allow this vision to

shape Britain selling the Bishop. I can tell you today that as part of

our renegotiation I am asking European leaders for a clear,

legally binding and irreversible agreement to end Britain's

obligation to work towards an ever closer union. It will mean Britain

can never be entangled in a political union against our will all

be drawn into any kind of United States of Europe.

We need to ensure that while the European Parliament plays an

important role, there is a more significant role for national

parliaments including our own Parliament right here in

Westminster. It is national parliaments which are and will

remain the main source of real democratically jit Massey and

accountability inside the EU. It is to the British Parliament that I

must account on the EU budget negotiations or on safeguarding our

place in the single market. Those are the parliaments which instil

respect, even fear, into national leaders. So it is time to give these

national parliaments a greater say over EU law making. Now, we're not

suggesting a veto for every single national Parliament. We acknowledge

that in a Europe of 28 that would mean gridlock, but we want to see a

new arrangement where groups of national parliaments can come

together and reject European laws which are not in their national

interest. We need to address the issue of sub sidarty. We believe if

powers don't need to reside in Brussels, they should be

automatically returned to Westminster. We want to see the EU's

commitment to this fully implemented with clear proposals to achieve

that. In addition the UK will need confirmation that the EU

institutions will fully respect the purpose behind the justice and home

affairs protocols in any future proposals dealing with justice and

home affairs matters. In particular, to preserve the UK's ability to

choose to participate. In addition, national security is and must remain

the sole responsibility of member States while recognising the

benefits of working together on issues that affect the security of

us all. Finally, in this area, people are also frustrated by some

legal judgements made in Europe that impact on life in Britain. Now, of

course, this relates as much to the European Convention on Human Rights

as the European Union which is why we need to act on both fronts. So we

will reform our relationship with the ECHR by scrapping Labour's Human

Rights Act and introducing a new British Bill of Rights. We will, of

course, consult on how to make this big constitutional change. The

consultation we will publish will set out our plan to remain

consistent with the founding principles of the convention, while

restoring the proper role of UK courts and our Parliament. And as we

reform the relationship between our courts and Strasbourg, it is also

right we consider the role of the European Court of Justice and the

Charter of Fundamental Rights. So as was agreed at the time of the Lisbon

Treaty, we will enshrine in our domestic law that the EU Charter of

Fundamental Rights does not create any new rights. We will make it our

explicit to our courts that they cannot use the EU charter as the

basis for any new legal challenge citing spurious hue Human Rights

grounds. We will examine whether we can go one step further. We need to

examine the way that Germany and other EU nations uphold their

constitution and sovereignty. For example, the constitutional court in

Germany retains the right to review whether essential constitutional

freedoms are respected when powers are transferred to Europe and it

reserves the right to review legal acts by the European institutions

and the courts to check that they remain within the scope of the EU's

powers. Or whether they have overstepped the mark. Now, we will

consider how this could be done in the United Kingdom. Now, fourth, we

believe in an open economy. But we've got to be able to cope with

all the pressures that free movement can bring on our schools, our

hospitals, and our public services. Right now, the pressures are too

great. Now, I appreciate that at a time when other European countries

are facing huge pressure from migration, outside the EU, this

maybe hard for some other EU countries to understand. But in a

way, these pressures are an example of exactly the point that the UK has

been making in recent years. For us, it is not a question of race or

background or ethnicity, Britain is one of the most open and

cosmopolitan countries on the face of the earth. People from all over

the world can find a community of their own right here in Britain. The

issue is one of scale and speed and the pressures on communities that

brings and at a time when public finances are already under severe

strain as a consequence of the financial crisis. Now, this was a

matter of enormous concern in our recent general election campaign.

And it remains so today. And unlike some other member states, Britain's

population is already expanding. Our population is set to reach over 70

million in the next decades and we're forecast to become the most

pop ulis country in the EU by 2050. At the same time, our next migration

is running at over 300,000 a year. That is not sustainable. We've taken

lots of steps to control immigration from outside the EU, but we need to

be able to exert greater control on arrivals from inside the EU too. The

principle of free movement of labour is a basic treaty right and a key

part of the single market. Over one million Brits benefit from their

right to live and work anywhere in the EU. We don't want to destroy

that principle which indeed many Brits take for granted, but freedom

of movement has never been an unqualified right and we need to

allow to operate on a more sustainable basis in the light of

the experience of recent years. Britain has always been an open,

trading nation. We don't want to change that, but we do want to find

arrangements to allow a member state like the UK to restore a sense of

fairness to our immigration system and to reduce the currently very

high level of migration from within the EU into the UK. Now, that means

first of all, correcting the mistakes of the past by making sure

that we are when new countries are admit to the EU, free movement will

not apply to those countries until their economies have converged more

closely with existing member states. We need to cre at the toughest

possible system for dealing with the abuse of free movement. That

includes tougher and longer re-entry bans for from youedsters and people

who collude in sham marriages, it is easier for an EU citizen to bring a

non-EU spouse to Britain than it is for a British citizen to do the same

thing. It means stronger powers to deport criminals and stop them

coming back, as well as preventing entry in the first place, it means

addressing judgements that widened the scope of free movement if a way

that made it much more difficult to tackle this sort of abuse. But

ultimately, if we're going to reduce the numbers coming here, we need

action that gives greater control of migration from the EU. As I have

said previously, we can do this by reducing the draw that our welfare

system can exert across Europe. To those who say this won't make a

difference, I say, look at the figures. We know that at any one

time, around 40% of all recent European Economic Area migrants are

supported by the UK benefit system. With each family claiming on average

around ?6,000 a year of ininn work benefits alone and over 10,000

recently arrived families claiming over ?10,000 a year. We need to

restore a sense of fairness and reduce this pull pack for subsidised

by the taxpayer. I promised four actions at the general election. Two

of them have already been achieved. EU migrants will not be able to

claim Universal Credit while looking for work and if those coming from

the EU haven't found work within six months, they can be required to

leave. But we need to go further to reduce the numbers coming here. So

we've proposed that people coming to Britain from the EU, must live here

and contribute for four years before they qualify for in work benefits or

social housing. And that we should end the practise of sending child

benefit overseas. Now, I understand how difficult some of these welfare

issues are more other member states and I'm open to different ways of

dealing with this issue. But we do need to secure arrangements that

deliver on the objectives set out in the Conservative Party manifesto to

control migration from the European Union. So these are the four

objectives at the heart of our renegotiation. Objective one,

protect the single market for Britain and others outside the

eurozone. What I mean by that is a set of binding principles that

guarantee fairness between euro and non euro countries. Objective two,

write competitiveness in into the DNA of the whole European Union,

this includes cutting a total burneden on business. Objective

three, exempt Britain from an ever closer union and bolster our

national parliaments, not through warm words, but through irreversible

changes. Objective four, tackle abuses of the right to free movement

and enable us to control migration from the European Union in line with

our manifesto. The precise... STUDIO: That's the Prime Minister

outlining his four key objectives for the European Union ahead of the

in-out referendum promised ahead of 2016. He says the decision is the

most important for Britain. You can continue to watch that

speech from David Cameron online: We will have analysis from Norman

Smith later. Should Russia be banned from

competing in next summer's Olympics? An independent report commissioned

by the World Anti-Doping Agency has recommended that the country's track

and field athletes should be barred from world athletics competitions,

after their report found evidence of cheating, drug abuse,

cover-ups and extortion throughout It also said London 2012 was

"sabotaged" by "widespread inaction" against athletes with suspicious

doping profiles. The man who led the staging

of that event, Lord Sebstian Coe, He says Russia must now

respond to the allegations. I have asked the Russian Athletics

Federation to answer those I have asked my council

colleagues to convene on Friday. Depending upon what we hear

in response to those allegations, we will looked at a range

of options which include sanctions. When you say "can include

sanctions", one of those sanctions It could be the suspension

of Russia. If there are frailties

in our anti-doping systems, If there are corporate governances

that should have been in place, particularly

around the criminal allegations that were made at the beginning of the

week, we will fix those as well. Dick Pound has called on Russia

to voluntarily suspend itself. What is your message to Russia

about what it should do now? That may well be the case

when our council reviews what it has been told by the Russian athletics

Federation at the end of the week. Can you clarify,

that they may well voluntarily...? Britain's Paula Radcliffe said she

is surprised at the scale of the doping.

I was devastated, shocked at the level and the depth and the audacity

have got away with it for so long and angry on behalf of my sport at

the damage that has been done to athletics by this.

I really do think that action has to be taken.

out and discovering the scale and the depth of it.

Also I think, we need to stress that it is really bad,

We have managed to discover it and it now needs to be taken forward

in such a way that we can start restoring that faith in athletics.

are competing on a level playing field and that fingers aren't going

Here with me is former world champ ston Steve scam cram. Paula

Radcliffe said she was shocked. How did you feel about it? I was shocked

at the kind of depth of the involvement of all aspects of

Russian sport, not just involvement of all aspects of

Government level. I think the independent commission have done a

fantastic job of independent commission have done a

really been able to in the past and getting people to talk to them in a

way, which des spite, I am getting people to talk to them in a

amount of fear around the environment there, they have

uncovered, at all levels there is athletes who were cheating

and coaches who are asking them and helping

and coaches who are asking them and administrators who are turning a

blind eye to that and then a an accredited lab which has not been

conducting the proper tests or when the proper tests and not making them

public and that's been the proper tests and not making them

within their sporting system and the proper tests and not making them

seems as though there have been a certain

seems as though there have been a the athletes who have positive tests

seems as though there have been a leading back to the

seems as though there have been a will make sure if you pay us, we

will speak to the IAAF and see if you can get you off

will speak to the IAAF and see if sanctions. It is the depth of that

that's been the shock. No shock that people in Russia are cheating back

inn athletics. You can go back to my day in the 70s and 80, I don't think

anyone would be shocked to find that out, but it is the depth of it that

I think the ultimate sanction of not leave Russian athletics now?

I think the ultimate sanction of not letting them compete is one which

has to be looked at. Sebastian Coe I think has given them an ultimatum to

either voluntarily come up with their own period of suspension, if

you like, away from the world of athletics, until they can do

something at least to look as if they are putting their house in

order - but that will not be done overnight. As in wider issues. This

is just overnight. As in wider issues. This

some wider issues within world sport. That laboratory does not just

test able in athletics. This commission was only looking at

athletics, but that lab will also test footballers, cyclists,

swimmers, other people who will compete in the Olympic Games. Even

Wada said its own laboratory was not fit for purpose, either. So I think

there is a lot of things which need to happen before we can be remotely

confident about people representing Russia at whatever sport, but they

are doing it in a fair way. It is up to the IOC, rather than the IAAF,

but alongside them, they should say at this moment, you cannot come to

deal in big games until you change your practices. Do you feel sympathy

for Russian athletes? No. If you have been cheating, you have been

cheating. It is against them much bigger picture? Well, it is and I

think there is a cultural issue as well. There are some clean Russian

athletes as well. They are not all cheating. There is always a choice,

I think. Some would argue that they are pressured into doing this, but

there is a choice. I think obviously once those athletes have been

cheating, to then have somebody come back and say, if you want to get off

with it, you have got to come up with a couple of hundred thousand

dollars, then it is not right at either end. I still do not have

sympathy for people who have been cheating in the first place. They

have got themselves into that mess. It is always the athletes who end up

with the ultimate punishment. The issue for me is, would we be denying

people in Russia, let's say, young 16-year-olds who has an ambition to

be a great swimmer or cyclist, would we be denying them the chance to

become a great athlete in the future? Hopefully not. It has to

come from the country they live in. There has to be pressure from within

Russia to change practices. I'm not sure that will happen overnight. How

much does this taint athletics? For me it is less what has been going on

in Russia per se, it is the fact that people within the Russian setup

have been able on the face of it to get right into the highest levels of

the IAAF. If the allegations are proven to be correct, they have been

able to affect the processes. Thankfully I don't think they have

been able to affect them in the long-term, but certainly the

prevarication around pursuing positive tests in Russia was

something which the IAAF cannot allow ever to happen again. I don't

think that is necessarily still happening now, but it is a really

difficult time for athletics and for the Federation. Seb is in charge, he

has got a difficult task. He has got to act really quickly and strongly.

He has to take the opportunity which this gives him. There have to be

special measures here. In the past, the IAAF is a family of 200-odd

athletic nations with voting processes and commissions and

committees. I think he has got to bypass a lot of that, given the

situation, and make some really tough decisions very, very quickly.

Coming up, we have a special report into the antimalarial drug Lariam,

which hundreds of service personnel say can cause mental health problems

and even suicides. More than one billion pounds could

be cut from social care services for older and disabled people in England

over the next year, according to council care bosses, leaving tens of

thousands facing getting less help with basic tasks like washing,

dressing and eating. More than half

of disabled people asked by the charity Scope say they don't get

enough care to live independently. The charity spoke to over 500 people

with disabilities and the work was carried out as part of a grant given

to them by the Department of Health. Scope want

the Chancellor to promise to spend more money on social services in the

Autumn Statement - his mini-budget - We went to meet Susan,

who says she's not getting I have a number

of health issues which have resulted I have been confined to

a wheelchair. I do not feel that

the care package that has been offered to me by my local authority

is sufficient enough for me to have This is my bedroom, where I spend

the majority of my time, especially on bad days, which can last

anything from one day to a week. The incontinence problem I have is

double incontinence, and that has been the hardest

for me to adjust to. My carer's last visit is

at ten o'clock at night. After ten o'clock the house is shut

up and I do not see the carer until If I have had an accident

in the night and I am not able to get out to the bathroom,

I'm left lying in a dirty nappy. It is horrible, it is a really

horrible and degrading feeling. You feel so helpless

because you want to do things for yourself, but unfortunately you

are not able to do it. I get four hours care a day

and it is not sufficient. I have been told

by the local authority my care If my hours need to be increased,

I will have to go into a care home. On my bad days,

when my bowel plays up, that affects I could sit here and look at these

pictures and cry and think, why me? You can't dwell on it because

if you start to dwell on it it will I do get very sad

when I look back on my life and I think, how can someone who is

healthy and fit end up like this? I could have quite honestly taken

my own life a couple of years ago. It was getting that bad.

I couldn't see any way out. The medication cupboard,

call it what you like, but it is It is a bit

like a bereavement because you are saying goodbye to the old you,

and you become a new you. I would like to go out more,

I would like to socialise more, I would like to spend more time

in the library perhaps reading books or just reading up things, but

again I would need someone with me If something happened and I am out,

I am not going to be able to clean I am very concerned

about my future with all the changes that are being made to things that

are impounded on disabled people. Benefits, care packages,

all sorts of different things. I am scared because I don't know

what next year is going to bring for me, what is going to be taken

away from me this year? We can speak now via webcam to

Jo Allen, who suffers She says she is in debt

because she doesn't receive enough money from social services to pay

for the care she needs each week. Joining us here

in the studio is Mark Atkinson, who is the CEO of Scope,

and Ray James, who is president of the Association of Directors

of Adult Social Services and runs First of all Jo, tell us what care

you need? I need care with washing, showering, getting out of bed,

toilet, helping preparing food and help with eating. So, lots of care,

basically. Have you cut back to the minimum? Absolutely. Mike Carey

money, or my hours, have not increased in the last 15 years. --

my care money. From January we will have to be paying pension

contributions as well. It all has to come from somewhere. So I have had

to take out loans to cover those costs, which absolutely terrifies me

because there will be a point when I cannot afford to do that any more.

Could you reduce the number of hours you have? You have 28 hours a week

at the moment. I do, but that is for the very basics. It just gets me out

of bed in the morning. Feeding once a day and then back to bed at night.

I do not even have a lunchtime call. Mark Atkinson, is this a typical

story? I think it is, unfortunately. The stories we have heard from Susan

and Jo are representative for many disabled people. The system is in

crisis. Social care is crumbling. We are calling on the government to

invest the money which is needed for disabled and older people. How

important is social care? Critically important. You have heard from Jo,

this is every day, practical support to get up in the morning, to get

dressed, washed, to live an independent life. This is absolutely

critical port which thousands and thousands of disabled people rely on

everyday. Not a luxury? Absolutely not. It is absolutely critical if

disabled people are going to live the same lives as is anybody else.

We are hearing stories of disabled people having to sleep in their

wheelchairs overnight, not being able to get to the toilet, not

getting a nutritious meal. This is not a luxury, this is people living

on the edge. How difficult is it for councils to balance the needs of

people like Jo with the money they have available to give them that

care? First of all, this is a really depressing read, this report from

Scope. You cannot depressing read, this report from

the individual stories in there. But there are more and more people

needing care and support. Very there are more and more people

well. And yet the government is reducing the funding available.

Councils are between a rock and a hard place. People need more compact

scare, and the Government hard place. People need more compact

to provide less money, so it is inevitable that we will be in danger

of not being able to provide safe and appropriate care

of not being able to provide safe really need it. So what is the

answer? The Chancellor has his spending review in a couple of

weeks, together with everybody across the sector. People receiving

and providing support. We are calling on the Chancellor to make

and providing support. We are sure he provides a fair and

sustainable funding settlement for social care, so

sustainable funding settlement for and train staff, so that people can

receive that care and train staff, so that people can

that we do not end up with undue consequences for the NHS and for

individuals. What would vote consequences be? Probably four main

things. Firstly, the way in which people experience care and support

depends on the skills and behaviours people experience care and support

of the front-line staff who go in. We need to be able to recruit and

pay appropriately and train those staff. Secondly, people will

inevitably end up receiving poorer quality care. The Care Quality

Commission already says that 40% of the services they regulate require

improvement. Thirdly, the NHS saying there will be an impact at A with

more people presenting. Fourthly and most importantly, people who rely on

social care not being able to get the care and support they need when

and where they need it. Jo, you say the money you get does not cover

your needs - are you worried? Absolutely, it terrifies me. I have

got huge debts and I do not know what is going to happen this time

next year. Where is that payment going to come from? I cannot carry

on the way I am going. What will you do? I really do not know. My concern

is that I will end up like Susan in a care home. Because that will be

the easy option for social services. But I really do not know. In terms

of strategy, Mark, there is a policy shift away from care homes towards

the kind of care which Jo has, and obviously many others. Half of the

number of places in care homes are being closed - is it a sustainable

situation? I don't think so. Scope feels that people should be able to

live an independent life, in their own homes. That is what we should be

aiming for. But one consequence of having taken ?4.6 billion out of

social care in the last five years is that more disabled people will

have little choice but to move out of their home, give up on that

independent life and to live in a residential care home. A Department

of Health spokesperson has said nobody should have to wait for hours

for the care they need. Still to come... The mother of a

little boy who died as a result of medical negligence speaks to us

about her ordeal and tells us why she will never trust the Health

Service again. Time time for the weather, with Carol. In Northern

Ireland last night, we broke the minimum temperature record

overnight. Temperature did not fall lower than 16.1 last night.

Edinburgh today we are expect in 17 etc. You can see, right next to

them, where the temperatures should be. We have a wet and windy day in

prospect today. This weather front moving out of Scotland, heading down

towards southern England, bringing some rain with it. That rain has

been heavy. We continue with a lot of cloud

around. A lot of cloud coming in across the south-west and it will be

accompanied by showers and drizzle and some light rain at times.

It is not going to feel cold though. The temperature in Barnstable 14

Celsius. For Wales, we are also looking at a

lot of rain. There will be drizzle along the coasts as well. For

Northern Ireland, the rain will continue to sweep south-east wards

as we go through the rest of the day. For Northern Scotland, we have

got showers and there will be gusty winds particularly in the Northern

Isles for a time. Gusting to 55mph. But at times across the north-east

through the day, we will see brighter breaks. For the South East,

there are some showers around. Some of those are going to be heavy and

possibly thundery and if it is not where you are, you will find there

is a lot of cloud. The weather front continues to migrate getting across

northern England and in through Wales. On either side of it, a lot

of cloud and the showers continuing across the north and the west.

Temperatures, again, we are in good shape for this stage in November. It

is not going to be a cold night. For Armistice Day, our weather front is

ensconced across northern England and Wales. Some heavy bursts too.

Some will fringe in across Devon and Cornwall and Somerset. Behind it,

some sunny breaks across northern and Eastern Scotland. You will

notice the next weather front showing its hand coming in from the

west and that's going to introduce more rain. Having said that, as we

head into Thursday, we will have a transient ridge of high pressure

across us. There will be a lot of settled weather around. The further

east that you are, the more likely you are to see sunshine, but the

next area of low pressure is coming in from the west and that will usurp

the high pressure. It will introduce wet and windy conditions and on its

southern flank the wind could be strong enough to touch gusts to gale

force. Temperatures by Thursday, 10 Celsius to 14 Celsius or 15 Celsius.

Then as we head on through Friday, well, Friday, we still have got our

weather front across us. Still introducing rain. But it will be

colder on Friday. A political party. We have been used to temperatures

above average for the last wee while. For some of us, they could

fall below average on Friday. We will see snow on the Scottish hills,

but there will be a lot of dry weather around too and sunshine. But

if you're thinking you're going to miss the mild weather, you won't

miss it for long, for Saturday and Sunday, the mild weather returns

once again, but that doesn't mean it will be bone dry!

Hello. It's Tuesday. It's 10.04am. I'm Joanna Gosling.

Welcome to the programme if you've just joined us.

The Prime Minister has set out his plans to change Britain's

relationship with the European Union saying more flexibility is

Let's acknowledge that the answer to every problem is not always more

uranium. Sometimes it is less Europe. Let's accept that one size

does not fit all. That flexibility is what I believe is best for

Britain and as it happens, best for Europe too.

The mother of a little boy who died as a result of medical negligence

speaks to us about how the Health Service failed her son and why she

And the killer whale displays that could soon be a thing of the past.

The Prime Minister is writing to the President of the European Council,

to set out the "better deal" he says the UK wants from its EU membership.

In a speech this morning, David Cameron said that reaching agreement

with the 27 other leaders was a big, but not impossible task and that

the European Union needs to be more flexible if it is to persuade

The commitment to an ever closer union is not a commitment that

should apply to Britain. We do not believe in it. We don't subscribe to

T we have a different vision for Europe.

Russia's Sports Minister says the country will co-operate with

anti-doping authorities following a report which accused the

country of presiding over widespread doping and corruption in athletics.

The report called for Russia to be suspended

from world athletics including next year's Olympic Games in Rio.

The Chief Executive of EasyJet has warned travellers they face

increased security checks both at Sharm el-Sheikh Airport and around

the world after a Russian airliner was brought down in a possible

EasyJet is one of four airlines which have cancelled all flights to

the Egyptian resort for at least another two weeks.

Plans to relax Sunday trading laws in England and Wales could be

thrown out by MPs after the SNP said it would vote against them.

The Government proposals would see opening hours

The Sunday Trading Act doesn't apply in Scotland, but the SNP says it's

worried that wages for workers across the UK would be driven down.

Myanmar's opposition leader Aung San Suu Chi says she's certain

the military won't sabotage the results of Sunday's elections,

which her party is expected to win by a landslide.

Although only a small number of seats have been declared so far,

her NLD party has won nearly all of them.

In her first BBC interview after the vote, she said the will of

Let's catch up with all the sport now.

There has been so much fall-out from yesterdays WADA report

revealing systematic state sponsored doping in Russian athletics and the

recommendation that they be thrown out of next year's Olympics in Rio.

I know you've been covering the story in depth.

Georgina Hermitage, you came back with two golds and a silver,

There is a lot of shock. More to the reaction is to yesterday's report

There is a lot of shock. More to the depth of it really.

There is a lot of shock. More to the have much of an opinion on it. I

have full faith in the system and full faith in Wada to

have full faith in the system and and see the outcome of

have full faith in the system and have faith in the system. You talked

about the system and the regulations about the system and the regulations

in place. You were tested yourself, obviously? Yeah, in Doha, I was

in place. You were tested yourself, tested after my 400 world record. I

was tested also after the anniversary games. I can't see how

people sort of break the system. I think

An incredible year for you, 2015, An incredible year for you, 2015,

bettering your own 400 world record. A fantastic year? Yeah, completely,

really unexpected, you know, after A fantastic year? Yeah, completely,

weeks, to come out and break another world

weeks, to come out and break another true. We were just looking at the,

how you qualify for the Paralympic Games. We think you have or you've

secured a spot at least and that should be your spot next year? Yeah,

fingers crossed and anything can happen in those times and especially

abouts susceptible to injury, but I'm going to keep my head done and

plod on and hopefully Rio will be a dream come true. No plodding, you

move very quickly! Amber Hill could make the shooting

team. 18-year-old Hill is in there. Nick Hope has been to meet her.

Amber Hill would say she is a normal teenager. I am very girlie.

Amber Hill would say she is a normal doing a beauty course. I think it's

nice to be able to do people's nails and have a chat and it is just

something that I'm really passionate about. But she also has a gun! When

you go along and tell people what I do, I get

you go along and tell people what I but that's the really nice thing

about it. I can have the balance of both. It is not like you're just

given a gun. I had to go through a lot of training. I was never left

unsupervised and you have to wear the protective gear, glasses, hats

and earphones. I have never heard of an accident happening. Tell me how

much of an influence your grandad had on your career? My grandad has

been a massive influence. I started when I was at school, I was doing

the girlie sports, but there was something about shooting that was a

bit different and my grandad used to do it She was a very, very good

talent at a very young age. She listened which was very good. She

did very well with it. Amber has been winning world medal and setting

world record since she was just 15 years old and now she made the Team

GB squad for Rio, she wants to make history by becoming the first UK

woman to win gold. Representing my country has been a dream of mine and

my grandad's and my family for the last four years. Hopefully I can

inspire other youngsters to get into a sport of some sort. It makes you

determined and focus on what you want to do it life.

Sad racing news today. Pat Eddery has died at the age of 63. He was

champion jockey 11 times and won every major race including three

derb Chris and rode over 4500 winners before retiring in 2003.

I will be S back with the headlines at

10.30am. Thank you

for joining us this morning. Welcome to the programme

if you've just joined us. We're on BBC Two and the

BBC News Channel until 11am. We're going to bring you the latest

reaction to David Cameron's speech this morning in which he set out

his terms to renegotiate Britain's Our political guru is standing

by and we'll bring you reaction from Brussels at the home

of the European Parliament. Do get

in touch throughout the programme. Texts will be charged

at the standard network rate. You can watch the programme online

wherever you are via the BBC News app or

our website bbc.co.uk/victoria You can also subscribe to all

our features on the news app, by going to add topics and

searching "Victoria Derbyshire". The mother of a six-year-old boy who

died in hospital, after a doctor was found guilty of causing

his death by gross negligence has told this programme she will never

trust the health service again. Jack Adcock, who had Down's

syndrome, died from complications from a chest infection at

Leicester Royal Infirmary in 2011. Last week, Doctor Hadiza Bower-Garba

was found guilty of manslaughter.Ms Last week, Doctor Hadiza Bower-Garba

was found guilty of manslaughter. Ms Adcock paid an emotional tribute

to her son on the steps of the court, saying he was one in a

million. We'll be talking to her

and her husband in a moment, Jack was born with Down's syndrome

and spent a lot of time in hospital. He had his first operation when he

was just six days old and had also In February 2011,

Jack fell ill with diarrhoea, sickness and breathlessness

and was admitted to hospital. Medical staff failed to recognise

the seriousness of his condition. 11 hours

after being admitted to the hospital His doctor Hadiza Bawa-Garba

failed to treat him properly. As he suffered a heart attack the

doctor told staff not to revive him A junior doctor realised the mistake

but it was too late to save him. Doctor Bawa-Garba was convicted of

manslaughter by gross negligence. Agency nurse Isabel Amaro was

found guilty of the same charge. Let's to talk to Nicola

along with her husband Vic. Thank you very much for coming in.

Tell us about Jack first of all, what sort of a boy was he? What sort

of a boy was he? Yes. He was brilliant. He was full of life. He

loved dancing. He loved seeing shows, he loved the Wiggles, he

loved books. He just loved life in general. He loved football. You used

to take him to the football, didn't you? Yes. He was in hospital a lot

of times. It didn't ruin his spirit? Not at all. You would never have

known. Had you met Jack, you would not have known he major heart

surgery. We used to have to chase him across the playground to get

into school and when he came out of school, he you would have to chase

him as well. He was full of life. Nothing kept him back. Nothing held

him backment he just gave everything a go. So in February 2011, when he

got poorly, what were the symptom? What was wrong and were you worried

initially? OK. He started with sickness and diarrhoea. At 10pm, he

started with sickness on the Thursday evening. Jack had sickness

and diarrhoea many times before, just like other children do. It

wasn't the sickness and diarrhoea that worried me. It was the

following morning we got up, I noticed he was lee that are jibbing,

but I put that down to him being awake all night with having the

sickness or the runs, but his breathing was quite rapid. I noticed

his fingernails had like a hint, of not blue, but a tinge. Something

worried me. I phoned the doctors and got him in straightaway, booked an

appointment, but I phoned back and said can you get me in now? I took

him straight to our local GP who was brilliant and he examined him. I

thought has he got a chest infection again? Jack used to suffer with

chest infections. He assessed him. And just said I'd like you to take

him to the hospital to get a second opinion. I wish I had never took him

that day. What happened once you got to the hospital?

We went to Ward nine, the assessment unit. We went to reception, there

was no urgency. Eventually the sister came to look at Jack and she

examine him. He was then taken to a bed where, now I know that she asked

for the doctor to come and see him straightaway, and obviously, she

assessed him and said he was very dry, which meant he was dehydrated.

Obviously, asking me things about Jack, and I told her that he had had

major heart surgery, he was on heart medication, just giving her the

background history. Giving her the letter which I was given from the

GP. And that day, it was not really, we did not really find out anything

until after the event. It was not... On that day, we just took him to

hospital thinking that he was in the hands of the professionals that were

going to make him better. It was not until after we had lost Jack that

things started to unravel and we found out more and more and more -

we just could not believe it. On that day, though, you really

believed he would be looked after as best as possible. Yes, even after

the end of the evening, when Jack fell asleep on me, even then when we

left, I went up to the doctor and thanked the, for looking after my

little boy. I wish I could take those words back. I never knew a

thing. We just got told that he died of pneumonia and an internal bleed.

That is all we were told. We went back into see Jack and obviously,

when we left, the doctor was crying, I was crying, everybody was crying

because nobody expected it. The doctor said to me, I am really

sorry, I wish the outcome had been different. Now we know what we know,

I am not surprised she said that. But at that point I thanked her for

looking after him. Because you take your children to hospital... I wish

I had kept him at home that day. I wish I had never taken him to

hospital. But then I would have been in trouble for duty of care. We did

not actually know until the coroners report. What was the moment when it

became clear to you that there were issues? We got a phone call on

Saturday morning from the hospital. We lost him on the Friday evening.

To say, we want to invite you into discuss what happened yesterday. So

we went in, there was myself, thick, my mum, my friend who took minutes

of the meeting, thankfully. And I remembered lots of things and I

remember asking one question, which was, I remember someone coming in

the room saying no, was, I remember someone coming in

everything. What did you mean by that? That is when things

everything. What did you mean by unravel. It was, for a split-second,

we got him mixed with another child. Another child who specifically had,

do not resuscitate on their records. And that little boy was discharged

that afternoon. He was not even in the hospital. But that was applied

to your sun? Yes. So he was not resuscitate it. That's correct. So

they started resuscitate him, which we now know. The doctor came into

the rule -- into the room and told them to stop. She admitted in court

that she did not actually look at Jack's face, she did not identify

Jack. She saw me and got me mixed up with the other little boy's parent.

Then somebody questioned her actions and went over the notes. What they

had done in that time is to take me back into the room and said, Jack

needs his mummy. He just looked fast asleep. I did not know anything. I

just thought he was sleeping. That is when everything started to

unravel really. When you heard that, how did you

unravel really. When you heard that, believe what I was hearing. What do

you mean you got him mixed up with another child? I don't think it

really sank in. And then obviously, we spoke to him for a few hours. And

then obviously, the police were called, which we were, why are the

police here? We have not done anything wrong. We were advised, any

sudden death and obviously, of a child, the police would be called

within 24 hours. So we gave our statements to the police. The police

then spoke to the coroner. And basically from there on, things

started to unravel. I just want to say, everybody has been amazing. The

coroner was fantastic, the police have been amazing. The prosecution

team - without them, we would not be where we are today and have got the

verdict we have got. At the time, when the coroner says to us, we had

planned his funeral and everything. when the coroner says to us, we had

found out that he passed away when the coroner says to us, we had

cockle septicaemia to pneumonia, and we went ahead and planned his

funeral. We got called back in to be told, I am sorry, we

funeral. We got called back in to be that boy. We thought, oh, my

funeral. We got called back in to be somebody to blame for this? Looking

back now, somebody to blame for this? Looking

could not release Jack. And thank God she didn't. As much as it ripped

us apart, because we would never have got the verdict that we got. It

was 11 weeks after when you could have the funeral? Yes. 11 weeks

after. We then laid Jack to rest and we carried on fighting and we have

been fighting ever since. You had to go from

been fighting ever since. You had to experience for any parent, grieving

the loss of your sun, and in an instant, everything changed, and as

you put it, you were fighting. How did you cope with that? I don't

know. I cannot tell you. People say, how have you got where you are? I

don't know. Our daughter, without, I would not be here. Probably the

same. She keeps us going. Ruby. How old she? Eight now. She was three

when we lost Jack. You said, Howell various people in authority got you

through it, the support you had. It has been amazing. Where there are

other moments where you felt you were being blocked or was it all

done pretty smoothly? I would, when we did not get Jack back 411 weeks,

we did not understand why. We are normal people, we do not understand

the law, the medical side. Obviously, we wanted our sun back

and we needed him back to lay him to rest. -- for 11 weeks. Everybody

kept us informed as much as they could. Lots was going on behind the

scenes which we did not know, which was very frustrating. But everybody

has been amazing. If the coroner had not done what she did, we would not

be where we are. We had the inquest should be years three months ago. If

the coroner had not question the people as she did and ask the expert

what she needed to ask him, and him say, if Jack had been given

antibiotics, consultants treatment, intensive care treatment, they would

have looked at his blood results, the outcome would have been very

different. From that inquest, it then went criminal. Without

everybody, support we would not have got that. Everyone has just been

amazing. And now, the doctor involved in one of the nurses have

both been convicted of manslaughter by gross negligence - how do you

feel about the verdict and towards them? We have been fighting for that

for so long. When things started to unravel, which we found out a lot at

the inquest, we just could not believe what we were hearing. We

were just like, oh, my god. If they had done this, this, this and this,

he would have still been here. Due to the doctor not getting a

consultant, not putting him in intensive care, not looking at his

blood tests, holding his antibiotics back for five, nearly six hours, the

outcome would have been different. She would have put no other nurses

in jeopardy at all. Because of the actions she did or didn't do that

day, we have lost our sun. I have always said, I know this situation

is very serious, and I have always said, if he had been given the

correct treatment on that day, and God forbid we had lost him, we could

have said, they were absolutely amazing. We could not say that. They

did nothing. How do you feel now about the prospect of having to take

a child in for medical care again? I dread the day I have to take Ruby

into A When we lost Jack we took out private medical insurance, which

only covers you for certain things. If anything happened, we would have

to take her to A I dread the day I have to do that. How do you get

through it now, al are you coping after the court verdict? Struggling.

We were on cloud nine on Wednesday because we wanted that verdict, it

is all we have ever wanted, for that doctor to be accountable for what

she did or lack of did that day. We were on cloud nine on that day. And

then the reality hits and you think, that is so serious. Jack

would have still been here. They were simple things, not complicated

things, had she done her job right. You just think of the neglect he was

given that day and it just... I have gone from being on cloud nine when

getting the verdict to writes down but again. We are running on

adrenaline, I think. Yes. You are there for each other. But it must be

hard? It is hard because we grieve differently. I like to talk. Vic is

very quiet. It is very difficult, isn't it? Yes. A lot of people talk

about forgiveness. Do you think you will ever be able to for giving this

situation? Absolutely not, no chance. I will never get my little

boy back. Due to that doctor not doing what she should have done that

day. She killed my sun. I am so sorry for your loss. Thank you for

coming in. We speak to a woman who set up

at date to catch a bogus landlord Let's go back to our top story -

David Cameron's demand for the reforms he wants for the UK

in the European Union. It's important to the polls

on this by 2017 - and it will decide if the UK will stay in or out

of the European Union. In the last hour,

the Prime Minister has given a speech explaining why the

European Union should be reformed. He has also written a letter to the

president of the European Council with his demands for changes, which

include changes to benefits some migrants can claim and taking steps

to protect the UK from giving money to bail out struggling countries,

as happened with Greece. Now let's speak to our political

guru Norman Smith for the details. How much detail? Well, we got the

gist of Mr Cameron's letter. People are piling out now after that

speech. He has just left. He said the reforms were substantial

reforms, he wanted all of them to addressed, he did not want some sort

of pig and Mitch approach from other EU leaders. -- pick and mix. But my

feeling was that he was saying to Europe, we are not the bad boys of

Europe, actually. We have been in the EU for long time. We are the

second biggest economy, we are the main defence force in Europe. We are

engaged in Europe, but we have a problem at the moment. We are not

signed up to your idea of some ever closer union. And I was struck as

all that he again reiterated the very clear warning that if we do not

get these sort of reforms, thing yes, we absolutely will leave. He

was very clear that this is a decisive moment, a

once-in-a-lifetime decision. This is it. Listen to what he said. The

renegotiation is now entering its formal phase following several

rounds of tech nickel discussions. Today I am writing to the president

of the European Council setting out how I want to address the concerns

of the British people and why I believe that the changes Britain is

seeking will benefit not just Britain but the European Union as a

whole. That would of course be for the negotiation itself to conclude

the precise legal changes needed to bring about the reforms that Britain

needs. But today I want to explain in more detail why we want to make

the changes we have set out and how they will make a difference. This is

perhaps the most important decision that the British people will have to

take at the ballot box in our lifetimes. So I want to set out for

the British people why this referendum matters and some of the

issues we should weigh up very carefully as the arguments ebb and

flow as we approach the referendum. I want to explain to our European

partners while we are holding this referendum, what we are asking for

and why. That letter is now winging its way over to the president of the

European Council, Donald task, for him to consider. So what might Mr

Cameron be writing in this letter he has been thinking about for so long?

Number one, protecting the pound, making sure the countries which are

not in the single currency do not get pushed around by those which

are. Number two, helpful business, is ripping back a lot of the EU red

tape and regulation, making it easier to do business, making Europe

more competitive. Number three, powers for Parliament, making sure

that Westminster and other parliaments can club together when

necessary to push back against EU legislation. And number four, the

most fraught, is benefit curbs. That is plans to restrict the ability of

EU migrants to get in work benefits. That would stop them claiming for up

to four years. How will the EU respond? We have a

critical Christmas summit where the EU will sit down to ponders Mr

Cameron's plans. I'm guessing they will be thinking problem number one,

is the refugee crisis. Britain hasn't been hugely helpful to the

rest of Europe when they have tried to put together a plan to deal with

all the Syrian refugees coming to Britain. Problem number two, is that

a UK problem, we are always banging on about Europe, John Major was

unhappy, Mrs Thatcher was unhappy, we had our referendum back in the

70s, is this just other euro winge by Britain? But problem three, which

I think will cause them most concern, is benefit bias. And that's

because under Mr Cameron's plans to say to EU migrants, looks you can't

have tax credits. To many EU leaders, that looks like

discrimination because their argument is hang on a sec, you could

have a British worker and a Polish worker both doing the same job and

yet the British worker would get paid more because they would get tax

credits whereas the Polish worker wouldn't. Many EU leaders say that

simply is not fair and that flouts one of the founding principles of

the EU that there should be free movement of labour. No restrictions

or disincentives for people to work in other countries. Now, as I say,

that's what's going to be critical a the Christmas summit, but just one

thing, I think, worth noting on. On that very difficult benefit demand

Mr Cameron did say in his speech he was open to looking at different

ways of dealing with this which suggests to me, Joanna, although he

is trying to drive a hard bar gape, there is room for negotiation, he is

looking for a deal. Thank you, Norman.

Thanks for joining us today. Still to come before 11am:

hundreds of service personnel say caused mental

The Prime Minister is writing to the President of the European Council,

to set out the "better deal" he says the UK wants from its EU membership.

In a speech this morning, David Cameron said that reaching

agreement with the 27 other leaders was a big, but not impossible task,

but that the UK has concerns about deeper European integration

The commitment in the treaty to an ever closer union is not a

commitment that should apply any longer to Britainmed we don't

believe in it. We don't subscribe to it. We have a different vision for

Europe. The Kremlin has called

the accusations that Russia presided over widespread doping

and corruption But the country's sports

minister says it will co-operate A report yesterday called for Russia

to be suspended from world athletics including next

year's Olympic Games in Rio. The mother of a six-year-old boy who

died in hospital after a You can go back to my day in the 70s

and the 80, I don't think anyone would be shocked to find that out.

But it is the depth of that which has been amazing.

The mother of a six-year-old boy who died in hospital after a

catastrophic failure in his care has told this programme she will never

Jack Adcock, who had Down's syndrome, died from complications

from a chest infection at Leicester Royal Infirmary in 2011.

On that day we just took him to hospital thinking he was in the

hands of the professionals that were going to make him better. It wasn't

until after we lost Jack that then things started unravelling and we

found out more and more and more that it was just, we just couldn't

believe it. The Chief Executive of Easyjet has

warned travellers they face increased security checks both at

Sharm el-Sheikh Airport and around the world after a Russian airliner

was brought down in a possible EasyJet is one of four airlines

which have cancelled all flights to the Egyptian resort for

at least another two weeks. Let's catch up with all

the sport now and join Olly Foster. Team GB has named

a six strong shooting squad 18-year-old European Games gold

medallist Amber Hill and World record holder Tim Kneale will be

making their Olympic debuts. Sam Burgess says

his heart just wasn't in Rugby Union which was one of the reasons

why he is returning to Rugby League just a few weeks after playing

for England at the World Cup. He's told the Daily Mail that Union

didn't give him as much enjoyment and accused certain ex players,

coaches and the media The second round draw has been made

in the FA Cup, 15 non-league sides they lost to Chesterfield

4-1 last night. The former 11 times flat racing

champion Pat Eddery has died. Eddery won the Derby three times

and won over 4,600 races Those are your sports headlines this

morning. See you later, thanks, Obamay.

-- Olly. MPs will begin hearing evidence

later this morning about the safety of a drug that's

widely prescribed to servicemen and The drug is called Lariam,

the trade name for mefloquine. Hundreds of ex-service personnel

and travellers have complained the drug caused mental health

problems, even suicides. One MP who was in the army has told

us he knew soldiers who threw their pills away because of fears

about the possible side effects. The manufacturers Roche say

the benefits outweigh the potential risks but some people

say Lariam should be banned. Dan Johnson's report begins with

Adam and Andrew who've suffered long-term after effects

since taking the drug. My sleep started to become

significantly disturbed. It started

off with extreme insomnia really. Dizziness, loss of balance,

irrational behaviour, Visual disturbances,

very extreme nightmares and just I could feel rage boiling

inside me physically, it was almost as if blood was

heating and pumping through. I remember a man on fire in

the corner of my room and smelling him burning and I remember seeing

black cats and fragments of things It's the persistent nightmare

disorder that is so debilitating, and the dreadful nights that I have

every night when you are wondering why did I have those dreadful dreams

and thoughts? Andrew's problems with Lariam

started when he was posted to He says the Army didn't give him

any choice about which drug to take to protect him from malaria, but he

soon wished he hadn't taken Lariam. It has left him with

a sleep disorder I will only ever sleep for

about one hour at a time and the conclusion of that hour of sleep

is a very vivid dream and probably between one in ten and one in 20

of those dreams is a nightmare. For example,

dreaming that you are in a burning Another nightmare very often

involves snakes, and I don't know if this relates to experiences I

have had with snakes in west Africa, but those are the sort of dreams

that I am prepared to talk about. But there are others that are

on a scale way beyond that. I have never discussed

the content of those with anyone, Adam has never been in the Army

but he did take four Lariam tablets They have had a huge

and lasting effect on his life. I still experience extreme

nightmares, predominately Depression is quite

a significant part of my life now. I went abroad for a two-week holiday

and it very much changed Johnny Mercer is a new MP and is

on the Defence Committee, Everybody knows there have been

rumours about this drug for a long time and the impact that it

has on different groups of people. I know people who have just

thrown it in the bin. That opens people up to malaria

which is a really deadly disease. Back in August when I started this

all I wanted to do was to clear up the position on this so our guys

and girls can take it safely knowing it will protect them from this

deadly disease, but at the same time It is all

about clearing up that message really and making sure we are doing

right by our service men and women. As we are talking a fellow new MP

who shares the same office reveals he once took

Larium on a visit to Africa. I went on my trip for a couple

of weeks or so and came back and I remember very clearly feeling

depressed and my wife saying I was I was reacting quite angrily

to situations and I did not Then I read about some

of the side-effects that can come with Lariam and kind of put two

and two together and realised this It was actually given to me without

my proper consent and it was also given to me in the knowledge that I

and other people were experiencing dreadful side-effects,

but we were denied an alternative. The alternative existed they knew,

we didn't. The Ministry of Defence

and the Veterans' Agency have been quite resolute in

their determination not to address It is an awful indictment on the way

that we do things and the way that we are supposed to care about people

who have been damaged and making The Ministry

of Defence told us it is still backing the use of Lariam and it is

only prescribed in accordance with It did introduce risk assessments a

couple of years ago for everyone who takes the drug and it is no longer

the first choice antimalarial. The MOD does say it has confidence

in this drug and I understand that, but I think there are still

questions to be asked and that is why the Defence Select

Committee is looking into this. There are a number of questions

that surround this issue. It is not

about me asking the questions, it is not issues that I might have

personally, it is families who feel their lives have genuinely changed

as a result of using this drug that It is about the families

and getting answers for them. If you were heading to one

of the areas that was applicable, I would speak to my doctor long

and hard about whether or not it was But ultimately malaria is worse

because you are going to die Adam sunk so low at one point

he thought about suicide. He is now the director

of a creative agency and is writing a book about the side-effects he

and others have experienced. He is

in touch with Andrew who retired Both men have strong feelings

about the future for Lariam. This is a problem drug, so why is it

still being prescribed on a massive I cannot say it should be banned

because I am not medically qualified to say so, but if this was a piece

of ammunition and it came with that level of risk - it either failed to

work or it blew up in your face, or it presented all sorts of problems -

we would have got rid You do not tolerate that level of

risk in your equipment and weapons. It is a dangerous drug that is not

properly understood and it should only be used

in exceptional circumstances. From my perspective because

of the extreme nature of what it can effect and do, it should be made

illegal, it should be outlawed. The manufacturers say the benefits of

the drug outweigh the risks, and they advise health care

professionals to follow its own advice.

Still to come - Seaworld in California waves goodbye to some of

its controversial killer whale displays - we'll find out why.

Finding somewhere to live can be a real struggle - but imagine

the frustration if the place you've fallen in love was all a con.

That's what happened to Otilija Baublyte,

who handed over ?1,000 to secure a flat to a man she later discovered

was a bogus landlord who didn't own the property he was offering her.

She decided to take the matter in her own hands and devised

In court he admitted two charges of false representation

But this is when she finally caught up with him.

Otilija Baublyte is here with us now.

That man has finally been sentenced. Just talk us through that moment.

Actually I was waiting to Atiqul Islam to meet me for a date but he

was always late. And my brother he was waiting in one of the coffee

shops, and my brother, he was waiting in the pub. That is how we

just caught him. My boyfriend he came from the left and my brother

from the right. And we just caught him. Take us back to the beginning,

how you got in touch with him in the first place, because you were

looking for somewhere to rent and you thought you had found a great

place? Exactly. Actually I put an advertisement on Gumtree that I was

looking for a flat or a room. After maybe one week that's why he found

me. He contacted me by my mobile phone. He said there was a flat with

three bedrooms and I said OK that would be nice to have a look. And we

met another day. And the flat looked really nice. There was three small

bedrooms but I thought, for ?1000 it is a really good price in London

because everywhere else was really expensive. I was waiting for the

keys but I had already given the money to him and I had already

signed the contract and given him a copy of my passport. And I thought

this looks OK. And my boyfriend, he was also with me. And after that, we

were just keeping waiting for the keys and he did not show up. So I

just kept calling to him but he was ignoring my calls. And after that,

one day after I finish work, I just tried to call him and he answered my

phone. But I did not mention about money or something, I just said, how

are you, nice to speak to you, something like that. And I just

said, I broke up with my boyfriend, thought you were really lies man,

blah, blah, blah. It is the moment when you decided you were going to

trap him? Exactly. Going back to how he managed to con you, he obviously

had access to this flat, so was there no sign at all? There was

actually one lady, and she opened the door for us. And it looked like,

I don't know what she was thinking but she just showed the flat to us

and I thought it was OK. But after a few days I checked the flat and she

opened the door, and I said, I have been there last week and I would

like to move here like, I don't know, next week. And she said, I am

not moving anywhere. It is my house. It is a council house. And I was

just, OK. So he did not own it and he had no way of letting it to you

and he had taken ?1000 from you? Exactly. And then he said, don't

worry, if you don't want this flat I can give it to other people. I said,

it is OK, I can pay you the deposit. So you totally trusted him. You knew

something was going on. Why didn't you go to the police? Actually I did

not expect... I don't know I thought maybe I should try by myself first.

I did not expect the police would take it seriously because maybe it

was a little my fault. And I thought, let's try to catch him in

this way, so that is why. And it was all quite straightforward in the

end. He was ignoring your calls and he got back in touch when he thought

he could go out on a date with you? Yes, I don't know why. Sometimes his

phone was off but as I said, 1 o'clock in the evening when I finish

my work, I just called him, I don't know, just for luck, and he

answered. I was so happy. And then he was just chatting around four

o'clock in the morning. And then I asked him to go with me. What made

you think of doing that? Actually I just... It was risky, wasn't it?

Were you not worried about arranging to meet him? I was a bit scared, and

the same evening he offered for me that he can bring some pizza for us

and we can have dinner. I said, no, let's meet the same day but like

three o'clock. And then he accepted. And I thought, OK, let's try. So, do

you think this is a scam which could happen to anybody? To anyone, yes.

You give your advertisement first and then anyone can contact you,

anyone. So you have had a big lesson. What advice would you give

to other people? In the same second you need to give money but you need

to get the keys as well. Otherwise you will just be waiting for

unlimited time and you will not get them. You are sorted now with

somewhere to live. Yes! We spoke to Gumtree -

they told us... The American wildlife park Sea World

is planning to phase out some of its more controversial shows

involving killer whales, or Orcas. It follows mounting criticism from

activists who say keeping orcas in The company says it will replace

its shows with an exhibition Robb Lott is

from the organisation Whale and Dolphin Conservation - he's part

of the anti-captivity team. What is your reaction to this news?

Good morning. A little cynical. I think it may be a public relations

exercise. Sea World is trying to reverse its decline in attendance

and repair its tarnished image. The fact remains that the orcas will

still be in a concrete tank. These are incredible teachers and they are

too big, smart, powerful and mobile over to thrive in such a lot of

visual environment. -- creatures. What impact would you say that

environment has on them? Well, it is proven to cause physical and

psychological damage to the orcas. The animal mortality rate for

captive orcas is nearly 2.5 times that of wild orcas. We know that in

the wild, there is one orca off the coast of the Pacific Northwest which

researchers believe to be more than 100 years old. Sadly in captivity,

they rarely survive beyond their early twenties. Sea World would say

that it is looking after these whales, protecting them, letting

people know about the animals and seeing them in action? Yes, they do.

And going back to the mortality rate, they talk about the

world-class veterinary care which they provide. They talk about the

restaurant quality fish which they provide. The fact remains, they do

live these shorter, impoverished lives. And the conservation angle,

we did some work at Whale and Dolphin Conservation a few years ago

and we've found that just 5 cents out of an $80 ticket actually goes

towards conservation. And this applies only to California, not

Texas or Florida. If the company really wants to project this more

natural environment and have a strong conservation message, then

why not roll it out to the other parks in the United States? Could

these animals ever be released into the wild? Well, Sea World has five

orcas which were captured from the wild and most of them came from

Iceland in the late 1970s and early 1980s. There is one individual

called Corky who came from the waters of the Pacific Northwest off

the course -- off the coast of British Columbia. She was captured

in 1969. Incredibly she has survived such a long time. She will be

probably 50 years old this year. We know a lot about her family in the

wild. Just last summer we were out in Vancouver Island and we saw her

brother and sister who is still swimming wild and free. It could be

a retirement project for Corky to reintroduce her to her ancestral

waters. This would take the form of an Ocean Sanctuary to monitor her

behaviour from that point on. But in the wild she would be in the prime

of her life now. We have got lots of people getting in touch on this one.

Jacqueline says on Facebook, if you have ever seen them in the wild, you

would know how cruel Sea World and others are. This one says, we do not

need aquariums, either. Always return them to the wild. This one

says, any animals kept in captivity should not be used to boost people

selling income. They should not be used to entertain people. Are there

many other places which have got killer whales like this? Yes, there

is two facilities in Europe, one in the south of France and one in

Tenerife. The orcas in the second one actually belong to Sea World as

part of a breeding loan. Around the world there are 58 orcas in

captivity at the moment. The worrying thing is what is happening

with the Chinese market. They are opening these huge facilities and

they have got ambitious plans to bring in wild orcas and wild beluga

whales from Russia. Russia is the only place in the world today where

you can legally capture wild orcas. This is an absolutely barbaric

operation. A lot of animals get injured in the process or die in

transportation and then go onto impoverished life in captivity. In

the end, people do pay to go along to see killer whales in the kinds of

shows which Sea World has been putting on? They do, but

shows which Sea World has been at the UK for example, we closed our

doors on the last orca nearly 20 years ago. And today there remains

no public desire or political will ever for them to reopen it

no public desire or political will UK. I think this is a PR exercise

following UK. I think this is a PR exercise

Sea World. It was very scant on the detail as to what

Sea World. It was very scant on the experience would be. And I have to

question the fact that these orcas, highly mobile, I can swim 100 miles

in a day, are still confined to these concrete tanks. So just what

naturalistic environment they could offer just defeats me, really, I do

not understand how that could be possible. Thank you very much for

joining us. A lot of you have been getting in touch after our

conversation with Nicola Adcock, whose son died in hospital after

catastrophic failure in his care in hospital. This one says, so sorry to

hear about Jack. Hope the NHS learn their lessons. This one says, you

cannot tarnish the whole of the NHS with this. This one says, private

medics make terrible mistakes, too. But the NHS will carry on saving

lives. You can watch the interview again on most run programme page.

Join us again tomorrow. Continuing reaction to David Cameron's speech

on Europe will be on BBC News throughout the day. Bye-bye.

MUSIC: Boombastic by Shaggy