Browse content similar to 28/11/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello and welcome to Stormont Today. With the First Minister telling his | :00:27. | :00:37. | |
:00:37. | :00:41. | ||
party conference he wants an end to the them and bus -- us mentality, | :00:41. | :00:45. | |
is it touchy-feely politics? glad to see I can still get under | :00:45. | :00:54. | |
the skin of Sinn Fein. And this statement... I believe the current | :00:54. | :00:58. | |
system of teacher training is neither affordable nor sustainable, | :00:58. | :01:02. | |
this is why I believe it is essential to carry out the study | :01:02. | :01:08. | |
and produce objective analysis of the financial stability of the two | :01:08. | :01:13. | |
university colleges. My guest throughout the programme is Sandy | :01:13. | :01:21. | |
Smith from Enterprise Northern Ireland. The Chancellor is due to | :01:21. | :01:25. | |
make his Autumn Statement tomorrow, that is on top of the discussion | :01:25. | :01:30. | |
about Arrow programme for government. Small and medium-sized | :01:30. | :01:33. | |
businesses are flavour of the month but how much will the measures | :01:33. | :01:41. | |
help? Sandy Smith, we had a discussion lastly, programme about | :01:41. | :01:45. | |
some criticism about the programme for government not emphasising | :01:45. | :01:50. | |
enterprise enough, do you think that is the case? We welcome the | :01:50. | :01:54. | |
programme for government and we would like to see something in it | :01:54. | :01:58. | |
about enterprise strategy. Our response to the programme for | :01:58. | :02:02. | |
government will be to help the assembly to put something in place | :02:02. | :02:07. | |
that will stimulate enterprise and that a bigger proportion of our | :02:07. | :02:15. | |
budget will go into specific issues. Will the fund not go a long way to | :02:15. | :02:20. | |
helping small and medium-sized businesses either expand or get off | :02:20. | :02:24. | |
the ground? It would be if that money did get his way to small | :02:25. | :02:28. | |
businesses, but under the current budget there is a very small | :02:28. | :02:32. | |
portion of the Budget that gets to small businesses to help them, both | :02:32. | :02:39. | |
in terms of capital to work with and in business start-up. The | :02:39. | :02:43. | |
programme we have been operating over the last few years is of the | :02:43. | :02:46. | |
order of a couple of million pounds, and what is in the budget currently | :02:46. | :02:50. | |
will be something of that order, whereas the overall budget is | :02:50. | :02:56. | |
something like 180 million so a very small proportion is spent on | :02:56. | :03:01. | |
stimulating small businesses. the government not emphasise and | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
put its eggs in the basket of foreign investment because they see | :03:05. | :03:15. | |
that as were the big job numbers come from? They do, but is that | :03:15. | :03:19. | |
where the big jobs come from? I suppose if you were developing a | :03:19. | :03:29. | |
:03:29. | :03:36. | ||
business model, you would be saying out of the entire budget a third of | :03:36. | :03:40. | |
the money might going to growing businesses locally, and a third of | :03:40. | :03:44. | |
the money going into stimulating new business start-up. No economist | :03:44. | :03:49. | |
really has come up with a total solution to an economy like ours, | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
but if there are three possible ways of generating business, I | :03:53. | :03:57. | |
think a reasonable suggestion that at least something approximating | :03:57. | :04:02. | |
one third of the Budget should go into each of the three pocket. | :04:02. | :04:08. | |
with us. There was good news for mountain bikers and lovers of | :04:08. | :04:13. | |
nocturnal wildlife at question time today as the agriculture minister | :04:13. | :04:16. | |
Didier U-turn over closing forest at night, and the plastic bag tax | :04:16. | :04:26. | |
:04:26. | :04:28. | ||
was back on the agenda. He was the new policy in response to Sam | :04:28. | :04:38. | |
Gardner. I wish to see forests used widely. Section 1 of the Forestry | :04:38. | :04:44. | |
Act creates a right for users subject to bye-laws. Those rules | :04:44. | :04:49. | |
should make clear to when these are suspended, for example when there | :04:49. | :04:54. | |
was a risk to health and safety. That Wright should also be | :04:54. | :04:57. | |
suspended when there is anti-social behaviour, when there is damage to | :04:57. | :05:04. | |
the forest, or officials are being obstructed. There is a need to | :05:04. | :05:10. | |
adopt a less restrictive by-laws and suggests most people behave | :05:10. | :05:13. | |
responsibly for their own safety but also their attitude to other | :05:13. | :05:22. | |
forest users. After consulting with the agriculture committee, I am | :05:22. | :05:25. | |
proposing to relax the restriction of night-time used by pedestrians, | :05:25. | :05:31. | |
to allow the continued use of forest roads after dark, and I also | :05:31. | :05:34. | |
intend to put cycling and other recreational facilities across as | :05:34. | :05:41. | |
much forest land as possible. ask her why she is proposing to | :05:41. | :05:46. | |
relax the situation, could she give a commitment to the house that she | :05:46. | :05:52. | |
will also be very happy to reveal with a view to increasing the | :05:52. | :05:55. | |
number of designated mountain biking and cycling routes within | :05:55. | :06:01. | |
forest parks? I have a meeting in the next few weeks with the | :06:01. | :06:07. | |
mountain biking Association. I have met them informally before just so | :06:07. | :06:12. | |
we can work in partnership more together. Our strategy set out that | :06:12. | :06:16. | |
we need to work in partnership more for recreational use, so that is | :06:16. | :06:23. | |
one of the issues I am actively working on. Egg producers have been | :06:23. | :06:28. | |
complaining the ban on battery eggs is not being complied with by many | :06:28. | :06:32. | |
other states in the EU so what is the minister doing to ensure a | :06:32. | :06:42. | |
:06:42. | :06:44. | ||
level playing field? Many states are in a position to comply with | :06:44. | :06:54. | |
the ban on battery eggs. A legal production could adversely affect | :06:54. | :06:56. | |
stability and fairness in the sector which is important to our | :06:56. | :07:02. | |
economy. I have been working closely with ministers regarding | :07:02. | :07:06. | |
the implementation of the laying hens directed. We have pressed the | :07:06. | :07:09. | |
commission to agree a way forward on enforcing the new rules that | :07:09. | :07:15. | |
will protect our producers who are compliant from disadvantaged. There | :07:15. | :07:21. | |
is also an agreement that would allow eggs from legal cages only to | :07:21. | :07:31. | |
be processed in the state, and a plan to see how they will reach | :07:31. | :07:34. | |
full compliance. I have made it clear I want any proposal brought | :07:35. | :07:40. | |
forward by the Commission to have guarantees built in, and for any | :07:40. | :07:42. | |
legislative amendments to be brought forward as a matter of | :07:42. | :07:48. | |
urgency. The plastic bag tax is not as straightforward as it might seem | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
- it's actually a single use carrier-bag Levy, and the | :07:52. | :07:56. | |
complications don't end there. the minister does bring forward | :07:56. | :08:00. | |
this tax, could he tell the House how it would be collected, who | :08:00. | :08:04. | |
would be collected, the cost of administration of that collection | :08:04. | :08:08. | |
and how his department would be able to know how many bags | :08:08. | :08:13. | |
retailers were handing out? Could I thank the member, and those are | :08:13. | :08:19. | |
matters that do occupy my mind at the moment. The simple model in | :08:19. | :08:23. | |
terms of collection would be for her Majesty's Revenue and Customs | :08:23. | :08:28. | |
to collect on behalf of the Northern Ireland government. They | :08:28. | :08:33. | |
do so in respect of all other taxes including VAT at the point of sale, | :08:33. | :08:38. | |
and it seems to me that is the right model going forward. That | :08:38. | :08:43. | |
where you would be able to mitigate the bureaucracy and expense and the | :08:43. | :08:49. | |
upfront cost in introducing this levy on the single bag users. So | :08:49. | :08:57. | |
far however, HMRC have declined that offer, but I welcome the fact | :08:57. | :09:01. | |
that you have written to the Treasury to ask that they would | :09:01. | :09:07. | |
further consider putting into their IT systems a mechanism whereby this | :09:07. | :09:13. | |
levy would be collected by them. I hope they will accept that proposal | :09:13. | :09:20. | |
because the alternatives are either end in-house or out house model is | :09:20. | :09:24. | |
likely to be more expensive, more bureaucratic, reduce the amount of | :09:24. | :09:31. | |
income that would come to our own Exchequer arising from the single | :09:31. | :09:36. | |
bag levy. I hope the HMRC recognising that tax affairs are | :09:36. | :09:42. | |
changing, that administrations will look for flexibilities in the | :09:42. | :09:51. | |
future and they could use this particular intervention as a model, | :09:51. | :09:54. | |
adjusting their financial mechanisms and tax collecting | :09:54. | :09:58. | |
mechanisms in a way that helps devolved administrations going | :09:58. | :10:04. | |
forward. He would have thought the public administration would provide | :10:05. | :10:13. | |
light relief? Responsibility was handed out of the blue-eyed boys, | :10:13. | :10:17. | |
irrespective of their ability to carry out duties. Can the Minister | :10:17. | :10:24. | |
assure the House that in this new 15 member council that members will | :10:24. | :10:29. | |
in fact have the capacity training and will honestly earned the | :10:29. | :10:33. | |
additional money that they may receive? Because that is not what | :10:33. | :10:40. | |
happened in all cases in the past. Last time I looked my eyes were | :10:41. | :10:50. | |
green, not brown. It is only Margaret who thinks I am the blue- | :10:50. | :11:00. | |
:11:00. | :11:01. | ||
eyed boy. Let's not go there! more serious note, a quick appeal | :11:01. | :11:09. | |
to Alex Attwood and Paul MLAs, please speaking to the microphone. | :11:09. | :11:13. | |
The employment and learning minister says there should be a | :11:13. | :11:16. | |
single teacher training system in Northern Ireland. He says there is | :11:16. | :11:20. | |
no reason why teachers should be trained in five separate | :11:20. | :11:24. | |
institutions and he told MLAs he remains committed to a merger | :11:24. | :11:29. | |
between strong mayor teaching College and Queen's University. | :11:29. | :11:34. | |
desire is to facilitate and agree a shared system of teacher education. | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
I'm not going to be prescriptive of the type of sharing and integration | :11:38. | :11:42. | |
that may be recommended by the study. Areas for consideration | :11:43. | :11:52. | |
:11:53. | :11:56. | ||
should include services, facilities and teaching. This is regarding an | :11:56. | :12:06. | |
:12:06. | :12:07. | ||
- issues like quality of access. I believe the current system of | :12:07. | :12:11. | |
teacher training is neither affordable nor sustainable. This is | :12:11. | :12:15. | |
why I believe it is essential to carry out the study and produce | :12:15. | :12:19. | |
subjective analysis of the financial stability of the two | :12:19. | :12:26. | |
university colleges, but I think it does also need to be undertaken an | :12:26. | :12:30. | |
informed debate of the funding in the future. I'm convinced the best | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
way forward is to develop a fully integrated education system | :12:35. | :12:40. | |
comprising an integrated system of teacher education. However, I know | :12:40. | :12:45. | |
I can't deliver this by myself and the views of others, including in | :12:45. | :12:52. | |
particular the stakeholders, are critical. Why it is this | :12:52. | :12:57. | |
announcement only about two and universities? Is the Minister | :12:57. | :13:07. | |
:13:07. | :13:11. | ||
In April 2003 a joint study was begun by the Department of | :13:11. | :13:20. | |
Education into teacher education. It went out to consultation last | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
year and consultation closed a year ago today. I wonder if the minister | :13:24. | :13:31. | |
could tell us what is the future of that strategic review and why this | :13:31. | :13:35. | |
is not a joint review being conducted by his department and the | :13:35. | :13:45. | |
:13:45. | :13:45. | ||
Department of Education? Does he not except that in page five of his | :13:45. | :13:53. | |
statement when he talks about Strang moors College managing its | :13:53. | :13:59. | |
affairs as best it can? At the outset of his statement he said | :13:59. | :14:04. | |
that he talked about the values and traditions of colleges. Can hire -- | :14:04. | :14:13. | |
can I ask how he can guarantee that the unique heritage of that college | :14:13. | :14:18. | |
will be preserved in such a merger? With me is the chair of the | :14:18. | :14:24. | |
employment and learning committee. We are talking about them and us | :14:25. | :14:30. | |
politics and the debate sounded very much for them and us. Yes, it | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
was disappointing. The key point is that we are producing too many | :14:34. | :14:40. | |
teachers and we are going to have to rationalise. Sooner or later we | :14:40. | :14:45. | |
will have to put the three of them into one. Are you not guilty of | :14:45. | :14:51. | |
them and us as well by calling for the merger? For me it was pure | :14:51. | :14:58. | |
economics that if you are �2.5 million down and you do not have | :14:58. | :15:02. | |
any money you have to do something. The real problem is that only 10 % | :15:02. | :15:06. | |
of the teachers we produce our getting full-time jobs when they | :15:06. | :15:10. | |
leave. If you are producing and that many teachers, there is | :15:10. | :15:17. | |
clearly something wrong. Why not rationalise with the two colleges | :15:17. | :15:22. | |
merging and look at the St Mary's issue further down the line? There | :15:23. | :15:27. | |
is a concern that if you go down one brute that Rolls will be | :15:27. | :15:37. | |
:15:37. | :15:38. | ||
changed. What is important in the society in which we operate is that | :15:38. | :15:42. | |
there should be one rule for everyone. You can look at the | :15:42. | :15:46. | |
balance sheet and say that you need to take action now. What has | :15:46. | :15:54. | |
happened with this decision is that strangles has been hung out to dry. | :15:54. | :15:58. | |
It will lose money and it will be difficult for the staff and the | :15:59. | :16:04. | |
students and I do not think it will be much better for St Mary's. | :16:04. | :16:14. | |
:16:14. | :16:17. | ||
don't think this is a case so far as Sinn Fein and the lining up to | :16:17. | :16:23. | |
support St Mary's? At there are obviously tie is in this area but | :16:23. | :16:27. | |
that does not mean you can't rationalise the situation. More | :16:27. | :16:32. | |
dialogue would be better. I can say to you that we are taking a very | :16:32. | :16:38. | |
impartial point of view. As a party we have accepted that it is not the | :16:38. | :16:42. | |
case that strangles has a Protestant ethos, it takes students | :16:42. | :16:48. | |
of all denominations, and we are trying to get the best training for | :16:48. | :16:53. | |
our teachers. What about your committee? There seems to be a | :16:53. | :16:59. | |
state of some disruption there. You were off on your trip to Paris last | :16:59. | :17:03. | |
week and in your absence this decision was taken about when | :17:03. | :17:08. | |
stayed's strike and you returned it today. It has been claimed that | :17:08. | :17:13. | |
that was undemocratic. It certainly was not undemocratic. The way you | :17:13. | :17:19. | |
deal with things in any committee is that you publish the agenda and | :17:19. | :17:25. | |
if you have any minor bits you can deal with them in any other | :17:25. | :17:30. | |
business. Today's meeting was done properly. Notice was given in | :17:30. | :17:34. | |
advance, here is what we are going to discuss, everybody had a chance | :17:35. | :17:40. | |
to have their say and we had a democratic vote. Barry was being a | :17:40. | :17:46. | |
bit opportunistic, shall we say, when I was away, which is politics, | :17:46. | :17:55. | |
but I have made sure that the vote has been regularised. FE are you in | :17:55. | :18:05. | |
:18:05. | :18:06. | ||
charge, given what happened in the sand by Diego trip? -- San Diego. | :18:06. | :18:12. | |
chairman is there to chair meetings. I only have two of votes. | :18:12. | :18:16. | |
Everything is done by consensus. The issue with San Diego as a | :18:16. | :18:21. | |
disappointment because I thought that was blown out of proportion. - | :18:21. | :18:26. | |
- is a disappointment. This was only a proprietary negotiation and | :18:26. | :18:30. | |
it was only going to go ahead if everybody agreed and I will be | :18:30. | :18:36. | |
showing two members of committee when we meet again is the | :18:36. | :18:42. | |
transcripts of the meetings at which they agreed to it. Thank you | :18:42. | :18:46. | |
very much. Sandy Wilson may have had them in stitches at the DUP | :18:46. | :18:49. | |
conference on Saturday but his comments have angered some Sinn | :18:49. | :18:59. | |
:18:59. | :19:05. | ||
Fein members. My primary function is to | :19:05. | :19:13. | |
scrutinise the work of the minister. I found his remarks at the weekend | :19:13. | :19:18. | |
disgraceful, speaking as a former prisoner. I found that they were | :19:18. | :19:23. | |
demeaning to him as a prisoner and to the entire executive and I would | :19:23. | :19:30. | |
go as far as to say that they eat demeaned the audience at home. | :19:30. | :19:40. | |
Those remarks bear absolutely no relation to what he still got to | :19:40. | :19:45. | |
say. I am glad to say that I can still get under the skin of Sinn | :19:46. | :19:51. | |
Fein. It pleases me but I have the response from them but I do. -- | :19:51. | :20:01. | |
:20:01. | :20:02. | ||
about I have. -- that I have. The imagery her children being placed | :20:02. | :20:08. | |
in a long creche is not something I made up. They were the people who | :20:08. | :20:15. | |
called the nursery long creche. By simply followed up a bat in a jury | :20:15. | :20:25. | |
:20:25. | :20:31. | ||
and I am sure many people across Northern Ireland will be amused. -- | :20:31. | :20:41. | |
:20:41. | :20:46. | ||
followed up goes comments. -- those are. I assume they agreed with all | :20:46. | :20:51. | |
of my comments about the former education minister. Staying with | :20:51. | :20:55. | |
the DUP conference, conferences are full of people trying to get their | :20:55. | :21:00. | |
case across the politicians. I met one campaign on Saturday he has | :21:00. | :21:04. | |
been highlighting the plight of patients with learning difficulties | :21:04. | :21:09. | |
trying to get rehabilitated into the community. A lack of resources | :21:09. | :21:16. | |
means that we will take some years for all of these patients to be | :21:16. | :21:24. | |
rehabilitated. You have more freedom in the community. You can | :21:24. | :21:31. | |
go to your local shop, the cinema, the opera house, you can visit | :21:31. | :21:37. | |
museums. So it is an issue of independence? Yes. A bit more | :21:37. | :21:47. | |
:21:47. | :21:55. | ||
freedom to do things. People in -- what do you think people need? | :21:55. | :22:00. | |
need places where there is freedom to come and go but where they can | :22:00. | :22:04. | |
be looked after at the same time, where they get meals cooked for | :22:04. | :22:11. | |
them. That shows that everybody is looking for money for all kinds of | :22:11. | :22:15. | |
campaigns. What can you say to the government to prove to them that | :22:15. | :22:20. | |
you do a good job and you are creating jobs? All of the | :22:20. | :22:27. | |
performance indicators do we have met and that is very important. We | :22:27. | :22:34. | |
met with a group of MLAs today and we showed them what we have | :22:34. | :22:37. | |
achieved. The other interesting statistic is that for every small | :22:37. | :22:40. | |
business you start each one generates almost three jobs and | :22:41. | :22:44. | |
over the period of the last seven years of the programmes we have | :22:44. | :22:51. | |
been running we have generated almost 20,000 jobs. That is a very | :22:51. | :22:56. | |
important statistic and a very good use of the resources. If we had | :22:56. | :23:00. | |
more resources we could continue to produce those outstanding | :23:00. | :23:06. | |
achievements. What is in a name? Quite a lot, it would seem. What we | :23:06. | :23:10. | |
call things or people could have serious implications so what should | :23:10. | :23:16. | |
we call people over the age of 60? It is an issue that clearly matters | :23:16. | :23:21. | |
to 1 m l a, as we look at our regular look at the work of the | :23:21. | :23:31. | |
Stormont committees. -- MLAs. you adopt the terminology of senior | :23:31. | :23:37. | |
citizens instead of older people? Don't put those people down. They | :23:37. | :23:43. | |
don't want to be referred to as being old, even at 100 they are | :23:43. | :23:51. | |
senior citizens. We would not call anybody old. You talk about | :23:51. | :23:55. | |
services far older people. People are comfortable about being | :23:55. | :24:05. | |
:24:05. | :24:06. | ||
described as that. There are mixed views on senior citizens, as long | :24:06. | :24:15. | |
as they are not called the LED -- the elderly! The old people's home | :24:15. | :24:21. | |
is probably something we should ban. It just shows how vexed our | :24:21. | :24:31. | |
:24:31. | :24:39. | ||
language is. They resented. -- and they resent it. In terms of the | :24:39. | :24:43. | |
public perception, there is clear damage being done to the minister | :24:43. | :24:50. | |
and the Department and in terms of the perception of a lack of | :24:50. | :24:53. | |
transparency and this is not the first time that such an allegation | :24:53. | :24:58. | |
has been labelled against this minister, so it is very important, | :24:58. | :25:02. | |
if this committee asks the minister to appear before it, to get some | :25:02. | :25:08. | |
clarity on what is going on and how this process came about, where a | :25:08. | :25:14. | |
five-year licence to give one company be exclusive rights to | :25:14. | :25:20. | |
extract gas from 750 square kilometres of countryside included | :25:20. | :25:25. | |
a farm holding belonging to the minister's husband. I think the | :25:25. | :25:32. | |
committee should invite her to appear before the committee. | :25:32. | :25:35. | |
accusations are coming from Mr Flanagan but it comes no surprise | :25:35. | :25:39. | |
to those of us to have been watching his activities over the | :25:39. | :25:44. | |
past few months. Any opportunity he gets to have a go at the minister, | :25:44. | :25:54. | |
:25:54. | :25:55. | ||
he has a go. It is very unfortunate that we, as a committee, are | :25:55. | :26:05. | |
:26:05. | :26:11. | ||
hearing such wild accusations. he tells us that there is no | :26:11. | :26:16. | |
conflict of interest and there is nothing to declare, he can say that, | :26:16. | :26:22. | |
but we need transparency. Myself and the deputy chairmen meet with | :26:22. | :26:32. | |
:26:32. | :26:33. | ||
the minister with a beauty trying to understand what his position is, | :26:33. | :26:40. | |
and also extending the invitation to attend the committee. | :26:40. | :26:47. | |
necessarily next week. I think the import is that she would attend | :26:47. | :26:57. | |
:26:57. | :26:59. | ||
next week. That committee is due to meet again later this week and if | :26:59. | :27:02. | |
the minister is there we will bring you the highlights. Another appeal | :27:03. | :27:08. | |
to MLAs - please turn off your mobile phones so that we do not get | :27:08. | :27:13. | |
that buzzing. You can keep up with just about everything going on in | :27:13. | :27:20. | |
the Chamber by going to our democracy live page. | :27:20. | :27:27. | |
We heard earlier how Peter Robinson used his conference at the weekend | :27:27. | :27:32. | |
to call for an end to sectarian division but any end to them and us | :27:32. | :27:41. | |
politics does not seem likely if today's business is to go by. | :27:41. | :27:47. | |
At the weekend Peter Robinson's vision was for an end to them and | :27:47. | :27:51. | |
us politics but there was a lot of it around the building today. In | :27:51. | :27:57. | |
the teacher training to belt we saw the Alliance Party coming under | :27:57. | :28:03. | |
fire from both nationalists and Unionists as he tried to to work | :28:03. | :28:09. | |
towards a joint policy. If this is the problems about a single shared | :28:09. | :28:14. | |
education system, it is not a good omen. | :28:14. | :28:19. | |
There was more them and us about policing. There was never going to | :28:19. | :28:24. | |
be a meeting of minds about this. The nationalists were asking for -- | :28:25. | :28:32. | |
former police officers to be compelled into co-operating with | :28:32. | :28:39. | |
investigations into past wrongdoing. The DUP effectively put a blocking | :28:39. | :28:46. | |
motion into place, meaning but the nationalists would need a cross- | :28:46. | :28:55. | |
community agreement. -- and meaning that. The support is very extensive | :28:55. | :29:04. | |
across Northern Ireland. We have expert access to bore facilities | :29:04. | :29:08. | |
for people wanting to start up businesses and there is a massive | :29:08. | :29:14. | |
support network for people with businesses. You can get space and | :29:14. | :29:24. | |
:29:24. | :29:26. | ||
use workshops. Yes, and we would like to see new businesses coming | :29:26. | :29:31. | |
in to the areas available. More importantly, the expertise that | :29:32. | :29:37. |