Ali Khedery - Special Assistant to the US Ambassador to Iraq, 2003-2009 HARDtalk


Ali Khedery - Special Assistant to the US Ambassador to Iraq, 2003-2009

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Ali Khedery - Special Assistant to the US Ambassador to Iraq, 2003-2009. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

aid convoy heading the Ukraine. As heavy fighting continues. It is now

:00:00.:00:00.

time for HARDtalk. Welcome to HARDtalk. American

:00:00.:00:15.

warplanes are once again attacking targets in Iraq ` ordered into

:00:16.:00:18.

action by a president who made it his business to end US military

:00:19.:00:27.

involvement in Iraq. To Barack Obama's critics, it is one more

:00:28.:00:30.

piece of evidence pointing to an incoherence of strategy in a region

:00:31.:00:33.

becoming ever more unstable and dangerous. My guest today is Ali

:00:34.:00:45.

Khedery, a former adviser to a string of American ambassadors in

:00:46.:00:47.

Baghdad. Does the United States have the ability to impose its will on

:00:48.:00:49.

the Middle East? Ali Khedery, welcome to HARDtalk.

:00:50.:01:28.

Thank you for having me. I just referred to the Middle East being

:01:29.:01:31.

more unstable, more dangerous than it has been in many decades. How

:01:32.:01:36.

much of the responsibility for that, do you think, rests with the

:01:37.:01:45.

United States? Obviously it is a very complicated situation. The

:01:46.:01:49.

situation we see today across the Middle East is partially due to

:01:50.:01:54.

American intervention like the war in 1991 in Iraq and again in 2003.

:01:55.:02:01.

But a lot of the variables are extremely complicated, owing to the

:02:02.:02:05.

poor leadership under the lakes of Saddam Hussein. And then there are

:02:06.:02:12.

broader religious, social, economic trends that are all colliding

:02:13.:02:18.

WriteNow across the Middle East and creating a dangerous situation for

:02:19.:02:23.

global stability. Nobody would disagree that it is great complex.

:02:24.:02:27.

But is it not true to say that looking at the span of

:02:28.:02:30.

administrations covering George W Bush and Barack Obama, there is a

:02:31.:02:35.

lesson to be learned, and that is whenever the United States tries to

:02:36.:02:41.

intervene actively, whether diplomatically or a militarily in a

:02:42.:02:46.

country like Iraq, it tends to backfire? I do not think you can

:02:47.:02:52.

draw that lesson. The lesson you can do instead is we have to be very

:02:53.:02:57.

careful, either as the United States for the international community,

:02:58.:03:02.

when intervening abroad. Particularly in distant lands were

:03:03.:03:06.

original speak the language for a nosy religion or the history. `` or

:03:07.:03:13.

know the. One example of positive liberation is the liberation of

:03:14.:03:19.

Kuwait. There was a dark lining when resident Bush called for the Shia

:03:20.:03:26.

and the Kurds to rise up against Saddam Hussein. You left them out to

:03:27.:03:32.

dry. The lesson we have learnt is that intervention without proper

:03:33.:03:38.

planning was not especially wise. And then a more isolationist posture

:03:39.:03:45.

under Barack Obama was equally unwise. It has resulted in even more

:03:46.:03:54.

of a mess than before Saddam Hussein fell. I want to get to the day's

:03:55.:04:02.

mess shortly. I want to tease out recent history a bit more. It seems

:04:03.:04:07.

to me that you yourself have a case to answer. I talked about recent

:04:08.:04:19.

interventions backfiring. You in fact have made a claim that you were

:04:20.:04:22.

instrumental in deciding that the Prime Minister was the key Shia

:04:23.:04:27.

Iraqi politician who Americans should invest in to promote as the

:04:28.:04:33.

leader capable of uniting Iraq from 2006 onwards. Are you prepared to

:04:34.:04:40.

say sorry for that? I am prepared to detail exactly what occurred in 2006

:04:41.:04:47.

and 2010. I did so in a recent piece in the Jewish and in post. `` in the

:04:48.:04:51.

Washington Post. You have to understand the position

:04:52.:04:59.

we were in in 2006. Iraq was in a civil war. The current Prime

:05:00.:05:05.

Minister was utterly feckless, indecisive" variant. It was very

:05:06.:05:11.

clear that Congolese Rice and the British Foreign Minister explicitly

:05:12.:05:17.

asked the prime minister to step down. As we learned in 2003, when

:05:18.:05:24.

you ask one leader to step down, you need somebody to fill the vacuum.

:05:25.:05:32.

After a series of interviews with various Iraqi leaders, Nouri Alma

:05:33.:05:37.

Key was seen to be the least worst option. In 2006 to thought you were

:05:38.:05:43.

doing the right thing by promoting him. Right now Barack Obama and his

:05:44.:05:48.

team think there are doing the right thing by promoting Haider al`Abadi

:05:49.:05:54.

as the right politician. As they may well find it is simply making

:05:55.:06:02.

matters worse. It is very well made. But the reality is when George W

:06:03.:06:06.

Bush undertook the decision to invade Iraq in 2003, many of us,

:06:07.:06:10.

including myself, were against that decision. But he as the President of

:06:11.:06:17.

United States conjunction with Tony Blair decided to do so. All of us

:06:18.:06:21.

collectively had to deal with the fallout. One could have stood on the

:06:22.:06:26.

sidelines and complained about it, or one could have volunteered to

:06:27.:06:31.

serve and try and affect things from the inside. That is the position I

:06:32.:06:36.

took. Those who knew me personally will tell you that I am not an

:06:37.:06:41.

apologist for America's foreign policy. Either the positive or a

:06:42.:06:48.

negative things we have seen. I tried to give the best counsel I

:06:49.:06:53.

could provide two successive ambassadors and generals in Baghdad.

:06:54.:06:59.

When you are faced with thousands of decisions on a daily basis,

:07:00.:07:03.

inevitably some of the decisions made are correct and some are

:07:04.:07:07.

incorrect. I will tell you, it is important to emphasise this, he

:07:08.:07:14.

proved to be exactly the right Prime Minister during his first term.

:07:15.:07:21.

Militias for running rampant across Iraq. When he took power, he crushed

:07:22.:07:32.

al`Qaeda and the militias. The civil war was reduced and violence was

:07:33.:07:36.

reduced by 90%. That takes us to 2010. By 2010, I stood firmly and

:07:37.:07:42.

virtually alone in opposing his return for a second term. Having

:07:43.:07:51.

known him since 2003, it is clear to me that he was taking advantage of

:07:52.:07:56.

the successes of the search and was cementing a dictatorship, a

:07:57.:07:59.

theocracy and was increasingly beholden to Iran. You had misjudged

:08:00.:08:08.

him. You called him a friend. He said the Obama Administration in

:08:09.:08:11.

recent years has made some key mistakes because they are not versed

:08:12.:08:20.

in the Middle East. But the fact is, you were very experienced. You

:08:21.:08:25.

misjudged him. You have to admit it now. We did not misjudged him. If

:08:26.:08:34.

you look at the 2006 episode against the 2010 episode, the violence was

:08:35.:08:41.

reduced by 90%. We needed a security minded prime minister in 2006 to

:08:42.:08:46.

restore order and stability. That is what happened. It is due to a wide

:08:47.:08:53.

variety of things, including the Sunni awakening and the coalition

:08:54.:08:57.

efforts. Like the British military intelligence services. But also

:08:58.:09:02.

owing a lot to the Iraqi unity themselves. But it was clear that

:09:03.:09:06.

Nouri al`Maliki had a plan to hijack Iraq's democracy. O to the more

:09:07.:09:13.

specific criticisms you have made of the Obama Administration in the

:09:14.:09:20.

years since you left it. You say that they have adopted an

:09:21.:09:25.

isolationist strategy and they have failed to appreciate their friends

:09:26.:09:32.

and confront their real enemies. I want you to explain, briefly as you

:09:33.:09:39.

can, you mean about that. When I failed to convince the White House

:09:40.:09:43.

to oppose Nouri al`Maliki's returning to thousands and, I put my

:09:44.:09:49.

money where my mouth is. I resigned in protest. Detailing exactly why I

:09:50.:09:53.

believe that Iraq was set on a path towards civil war, perhaps a

:09:54.:09:57.

regional holy war, going back to Nouri al`Maliki's policies. Today we

:09:58.:10:03.

have seen those predictions become a reality. By campaigning on a winning

:10:04.:10:10.

election, two elections, promising to end the war is across Iraq and

:10:11.:10:17.

Afghanistan, the president has closed those wars in an

:10:18.:10:21.

irresponsible manner. He has left our friends across the region

:10:22.:10:26.

feeling alone and abandoned. Increasingly, emboldened our

:10:27.:10:35.

strategic allies, even a site in Syria. Thereby giving birth to very

:10:36.:10:48.

global threats like ISIS. The strategic view of yours is

:10:49.:10:50.

important, but it does not make much sense. You say Obama has failed to

:10:51.:10:57.

realise the real enemy, the head of the snake, is Iran. But it is not

:10:58.:11:02.

Iran that is responsible for the rise of this extreme Sunni, jihadist

:11:03.:11:08.

a movement that we call Islamic State. That is not Iran. The money

:11:09.:11:14.

for that sweeping extremism is coming from the Gulf, from cacti,

:11:15.:11:23.

Kuwait, Saudi Arabia. I could not disagree with you more. Here is why.

:11:24.:11:30.

ISIS did not exist three years ago. What we were faced with was al`Qaeda

:11:31.:11:36.

Central in Afghanistan, Pakistan and some franchises in Yemen, North

:11:37.:11:48.

Africa. ISIS was the direct result of Asad's genocide campaign in

:11:49.:11:55.

Syria. Who has helped him? It is his own militarily, Hezbollah, Iraqi

:11:56.:12:05.

militias and also Iran's Revolutionary guard. By killing

:12:06.:12:09.

hundreds of thousands of Syrian civilians, by displacing millions

:12:10.:12:13.

more, that created that disillusioned and disenfranchised

:12:14.:12:20.

Sunni Arabs. And Nouri al`Maliki was doing the same, creating an

:12:21.:12:26.

environment where we saw al`Qaeda, an entity that was supercharged,

:12:27.:12:35.

welcomed or created. That is why it it is important not to address the

:12:36.:12:41.

symptoms, but to address the underlying causes. A recent

:12:42.:12:48.

investigation by the New York Times which concluded ISIS has the pocket

:12:49.:12:55.

donors in places like Kuwait and Qatar, Turkish brokers who do

:12:56.:13:03.

business with these groups. If we are saying that Islamic State

:13:04.:13:08.

represents a long`term strategic threat to the United States, this is

:13:09.:13:12.

not really about Iran, it is about some of the countries which we call

:13:13.:13:14.

partners. about both. It is about Iran, Bashar

:13:15.:13:31.

al`Assad, Hezbollah, the Shia militia and radicalisation. It is

:13:32.:13:35.

also about the rude funders of some of these jihadis like wealthy

:13:36.:13:40.

individuals in the Gulf states or regional allies or individuals in

:13:41.:13:46.

Turkey. I absolutely conquer that Moore has got to be done. That is

:13:47.:13:50.

why I recently called for President Obama to appoint a Middle East

:13:51.:13:55.

co`ordinator to work with both regional allies, with allies like

:13:56.:14:00.

the UK, the EU, and even pull in potential foes like Russia and

:14:01.:14:04.

China, because really, this has become a global pandemic that is

:14:05.:14:10.

spreading, that is becoming uncontrollable. And unless the

:14:11.:14:13.

international community moves quickly to work together, this

:14:14.:14:17.

problem will only missed us decides further and endangered the global

:14:18.:14:21.

Middle East, global energy supplies and the global economy. `` Rob will

:14:22.:14:31.

only metastasise. You talk about a Middle East tsar to bring about

:14:32.:14:36.

policy`making in the US. It seems to me that you think that man should be

:14:37.:14:40.

a senior general to have the heft and the weight to push through

:14:41.:14:44.

coherent policy`making. Does that suggest you believe there are

:14:45.:14:49.

military solutions to this? Obama has sent the warplanes back in.

:14:50.:14:55.

There is some discussion in some quarters contemplating American

:14:56.:14:57.

troops back on the ground in Iraq. Are you an advocate of that? I'm not

:14:58.:15:05.

at all an advocate of boots on the ground in the Middle East. I'm very

:15:06.:15:11.

sceptical even of American air intervention in the Middle East,

:15:12.:15:15.

even in Iraq. The recommendation I have made in the appointment of a

:15:16.:15:18.

5`star general is rooted very deep in American bureaucracy. Basically,

:15:19.:15:23.

having worked for five American ambassadors in Iraq and three.

:15:24.:15:27.

Amanda is that US Central command, which is the US entity in charge of

:15:28.:15:33.

the Middle East and South Asia, what I have seen first hand is that the

:15:34.:15:37.

US military is vastly more resourced than its civilian counterparts. For

:15:38.:15:43.

example, when I General David Petraeus, he had his own 737, secure

:15:44.:15:54.

phone lines and so on. The US ambassador, if he was lucky, all he

:15:55.:15:57.

could rely on was a working blackberry. You are on the record as

:15:58.:16:05.

saying that the US should develop an overarching coherent Middle East

:16:06.:16:08.

strategy that must be front and centre of all foreign policy`making.

:16:09.:16:12.

Given the complexity of the individual challenges in Iraq,

:16:13.:16:17.

Syria, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, it is simply superficial now to say that

:16:18.:16:22.

this must be one coherent Middle East strategic direction. It is not

:16:23.:16:28.

possible. I think it is imperative that we have a regional strategy in

:16:29.:16:32.

the Middle East and the reason why is because right now, again,

:16:33.:16:37.

particularly deep inside the bureaucracy, there are silos. We

:16:38.:16:42.

deal with Libya as an isolated problem. Egypt and its neighbours.

:16:43.:16:47.

We deal with the problems in Yemen as isolated problems. Same as Syria

:16:48.:16:51.

and Iraq. Especially when it comes to Syria and Iraq. What we have seen

:16:52.:16:56.

is the fusion of those two conflicts into one. Throughout the Iraq War,

:16:57.:17:03.

we received messages from the commander of the Iranian

:17:04.:17:05.

Revolutionary guards. He repeatedly told me he was in charge of Iranian

:17:06.:17:11.

policy from Gaza to Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, Pakistan and

:17:12.:17:16.

in the Gulf countries. What we were seeing was that the Iranians were

:17:17.:17:20.

manipulating events across the region, so they would pressure us in

:17:21.:17:24.

one area where they were not happy and they would reward us in another

:17:25.:17:28.

area when it was in their interest. What we need again is, whether it is

:17:29.:17:33.

the US or someone from the UK, what we really need is a global alliance

:17:34.:17:37.

to confront this transnational phenomenon called ISIS or archived

:17:38.:17:41.

because throughout the Western world, bureaucracies are geared

:17:42.:17:45.

towards confronting sovereign actors like the former Soviet Union as

:17:46.:17:50.

opposed to transnational non`state actors like ISIS or Al`Qaeda.

:17:51.:17:56.

Frankly, 9/11 and the assassination of Ambassador Chris Stephen in 2012

:17:57.:18:00.

and more recent events have proven that the current structures are not

:18:01.:18:05.

capable of handling and addressing those threats. Let me return to the

:18:06.:18:12.

issue of Iraq, if I may. The administration 's position is can

:18:13.:18:16.

happen unless there is a government in Baghdad committed to maintaining

:18:17.:18:20.

the unity of the nation and including all of the different sects

:18:21.:18:26.

and communal groups in a political future. It seems to me that raises

:18:27.:18:31.

another awkward question for you. In a different life not so long ago,

:18:32.:18:34.

just three or four years ago, you worked for Exxon. You pushed Exxon

:18:35.:18:41.

to draw up specific deals with the Kurdish regional government and oil

:18:42.:18:45.

into Turkey, to make lots of money for Exxon and the Kurds as well.

:18:46.:18:50.

That sort of deal is thoroughly disapproved of in Baghdad and

:18:51.:18:53.

actually is again contributing to the fragmentation of Iraq, not its

:18:54.:19:01.

unity. Do you agree? I do not agree. In fact, I view that very much as a

:19:02.:19:07.

glass half empty argument. This is why. Very few individuals can claim

:19:08.:19:13.

to have helped bring in the world's largest company, literally and

:19:14.:19:18.

encouraged it to invest $1 billion in Iraq. If we look at Iraq as one

:19:19.:19:25.

country... With respect, you were not. You were working with the

:19:26.:19:28.

Kurdish regional government and what we see right now is that the Kurds,

:19:29.:19:32.

more and more, are exploiting the access to the oil well to develop a

:19:33.:19:38.

completely independent strategy. Right, again. I completely disagree.

:19:39.:19:46.

You have to go back to the Iraqi constitution, which explicitly grant

:19:47.:19:48.

the Kurds the authority, for example, to sign contracts when new

:19:49.:19:59.

oilfields. It is in the new Iraqi constitution. The entry of the likes

:20:00.:20:02.

of Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Gazprom and total, former energy giants, into

:20:03.:20:09.

Kurdistan and Basra in southern Iraq, are a great thing for all of

:20:10.:20:14.

Iraq because any revenue produced from any part of Iraq, again going

:20:15.:20:19.

back to the constitution, belong to the population of the entire country

:20:20.:20:23.

and are to be divided based on the population of each province. And the

:20:24.:20:28.

Kurds have not to my knowledge ever demanded anything separately. What

:20:29.:20:33.

they have demanded is the implementation of the Constitution.

:20:34.:20:36.

May I interrupt because that is obviously not the way it is seen in

:20:37.:20:40.

Baghdad. They are deeply unhappy with it. But before we finish, I

:20:41.:20:45.

want to bring things back to where we are today. People around the

:20:46.:20:49.

world right now are being exposed to the most gruesome video, where an

:20:50.:20:53.

American citizen, a journalist, James Foley, is beheaded, executed

:20:54.:20:58.

by a member of the Islamic State movement. It brings home the degree

:20:59.:21:03.

to which right now, events are spiralling completely out of control

:21:04.:21:10.

in Iraq. Do you see that the Obama administration has a strategy for

:21:11.:21:18.

exerting some sort of control? Not at all. And as I have said recently,

:21:19.:21:25.

President Obama calling ISIS the junior varsity team, which roughly

:21:26.:21:31.

on global terms means a grade school sports team, in January and then

:21:32.:21:34.

last week, his deputy national security adviser said that ISIS does

:21:35.:21:40.

not pose a threat to the American homeland more to American

:21:41.:21:44.

interests, those statements are astounding frankly and I hope that

:21:45.:21:54.

events like this vicious murder will help to wake up the White House and

:21:55.:22:00.

will help to wake up the American population and our global allies

:22:01.:22:03.

that we have a very serious problem on our hands. Again, you cannot

:22:04.:22:08.

address Iraq's problems without addressing Syria's Robbins, for

:22:09.:22:15.

example. And without stopping the genocide being perpetuated by Bashar

:22:16.:22:18.

al`Assad, Hezbollah, Iran and the Revolutionary Guards, you will never

:22:19.:22:23.

be able to get hold of ISIS. These tactical pinpoint strikes against

:22:24.:22:27.

ISIS in Iraq will do nothing towards solving the problems of ISIS and the

:22:28.:22:34.

region. A full on intervention was tried by George W Bush and many

:22:35.:22:38.

would argue that did not work. This is my last point. Maybe it is time

:22:39.:22:43.

to think of what a Harvard professor said the other day: Strategic

:22:44.:22:47.

disengagement may write now be the best option for the Middle East, for

:22:48.:22:52.

the United States in the Middle East. Absolutely not. Could not

:22:53.:22:58.

disagree with him more. Strategic disengagement would result in the

:22:59.:23:03.

following: It would result in the unravelling of Syria and the death

:23:04.:23:07.

of potentially millions after the couple of hundreds of thousands who

:23:08.:23:10.

have already died, it would result in the genocide in Iraq as well, it

:23:11.:23:15.

would spill over and become a full regional war between major Shia

:23:16.:23:18.

powers like Iran and the government in Baghdad, between major Sunni

:23:19.:23:23.

powers like the government in Turkey and potentially Saudi Arabia, and it

:23:24.:23:28.

would destabilise the entire Middle East and the entire Middle East

:23:29.:23:30.

would become a breeding ground for transnational jihadi 's, pulling in

:23:31.:23:35.

further Western citizens who are disaffected youths from London or

:23:36.:23:40.

New York or purse or other cities from around the world. The absolute

:23:41.:23:44.

last then you should do is continue to say that this problem does not

:23:45.:23:48.

exist and ignore it. In an age when you can get on a plane and fly to

:23:49.:23:53.

New York in 12 hours from somewhere like Istanbul, disengagement is not

:23:54.:23:59.

an option. We have to end it there. Thank you. Thank you.

:24:00.:24:23.

The bank holiday weekend for Northern Ireland, England and Wales

:24:24.:24:28.

is fast approaching and I will give you an indication of what is to come

:24:29.:24:31.

in just a moment. For today, it will

:24:32.:24:33.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS