Browse content similar to 25/02/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Clues were scattered all over the BBC, so large you could trip | :00:00. | :00:07. | |
And yet and yet, news of Savile's monstrous behaviour somehow never | :00:08. | :00:13. | |
During the entirety of my time at, neither buying zero, wink, gesture, | :00:14. | :00:30. | |
intimation or innuendo did any information come to me regarding | :00:31. | :00:33. | |
Savile and his deviant behaviour. Dysfunction and deference | :00:34. | :00:36. | |
at the corporation, We will ask what this says about the | :00:37. | :00:37. | |
BBC. Also tonight, in a year of rage | :00:38. | :00:46. | |
in American politics, we look at the Black | :00:47. | :00:48. | |
Lives Matter movement. They killed him for no reason, | :00:49. | :00:50. | |
and they've got every excuse in the world as to | :00:51. | :00:55. | |
why they killed him. The prize is a back | :00:56. | :00:58. | |
door into our iPhones. We'll ask if this is really | :00:59. | :01:03. | |
about privacy, or just corporate You might have thought | :01:04. | :01:07. | |
it was impossible to say anything new about Jimmy Savile's abuse, | :01:08. | :01:23. | |
until that is, the BBC published its independent inquiry | :01:24. | :01:26. | |
into the scandal today. The report from Dame Janet Smith, | :01:27. | :01:28. | |
together with an accompanying one into Stuart Hall, | :01:29. | :01:31. | |
runs to over a thousand pages, documenting the crimes, | :01:32. | :01:38. | |
and just how close the BBC as an institution was to finding | :01:39. | :01:40. | |
out about them. The clues were barely hidden, | :01:41. | :01:42. | |
there were opportunities to spot them, suspicions and some inquiries, | :01:43. | :01:45. | |
yet the knowledge of what Savile was up to, just didn't make it | :01:46. | :01:48. | |
to the senior management. While that has echoes of other | :01:49. | :01:52. | |
corporate scandals, in this case nothing was pieced together, | :01:53. | :01:55. | |
partly down to a dysfunctional A lot of what's in the report | :01:56. | :02:00. | |
is history, but a lot is current: on the BBC, fear of management | :02:01. | :02:04. | |
and deference to on-screen talent. A serial rapist and a predatory | :02:05. | :02:17. | |
sexual abuse are both hid in plain sight at the BBC for decades. It was | :02:18. | :02:23. | |
a dark chapter in the history of the organisation, but a much darker one | :02:24. | :02:29. | |
for all of you. Lord Hall apologised to the victims today Jimmy Savile. | :02:30. | :02:33. | |
Dame Janet Smith's independent review heard testimony that 72 | :02:34. | :02:36. | |
people were sexually abused by Savile thanks to his BBC link. The | :02:37. | :02:42. | |
report makes clear Jimmy Savile's abuse took place at a range of BBC | :02:43. | :02:47. | |
premises, including here at the division centre. Some floor managers | :02:48. | :02:51. | |
and producers saw or heard things. Some of the victims were themselves | :02:52. | :02:56. | |
staff members, but the BBC was a hierarchical place, so their | :02:57. | :03:00. | |
concerns were never passed on. Some staff members feared to blow the | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
whistle on a powerful member of the talent. So Dame Janet Smith came to | :03:06. | :03:10. | |
an astonishing conclusion, yes, people at the BBC knew about Jimmy | :03:11. | :03:15. | |
Savile but not BBC management. Jim was in charge of light | :03:16. | :03:18. | |
entertainment. You understand why lots of viewers | :03:19. | :03:23. | |
will be in disbelief that given the volume of what happened, people like | :03:24. | :03:28. | |
you did find out about it? I absolutely understand there would be | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
enormous scepticism amongst the audience. I can only speak for | :03:33. | :03:39. | |
myself and say that genuinely no information had come my way while I | :03:40. | :03:45. | |
was in the post, which would have alerted me or made me curious all | :03:46. | :03:50. | |
looked into potential villainy on SAvile's part. Even so Dame Janet | :03:51. | :03:57. | |
Smith identified three opportunities to stop Jimmy Savile. She thinks his | :03:58. | :04:02. | |
radio producer should have acted. On one occasion he was prepared to act | :04:03. | :04:08. | |
as a provider for a young woman for Jimmy Savile to have sex with. I | :04:09. | :04:15. | |
think he knew that Savile would have casual sex with teenage girls as and | :04:16. | :04:20. | |
when he could get it. I am satisfied Mr Best and must have realised from | :04:21. | :04:23. | |
their appearance at some of the girls might well have been underage. | :04:24. | :04:28. | |
He admired Jim Lee Savill and I do not think it ever crossed his mind | :04:29. | :04:34. | |
that he should report him. BBC leaders also miss signs about Jimmy | :04:35. | :04:40. | |
Savile, like some of his public statements to the press which were | :04:41. | :04:44. | |
dismissed as bragging. When you look back is any incident | :04:45. | :04:47. | |
or moment in your own experience when you think there was a hint, | :04:48. | :04:52. | |
something you should have clocked? I regret to answer you that no. He was | :04:53. | :04:59. | |
in the building doing Jim'll Fix It for 13 weeks of the year. I | :05:00. | :05:06. | |
regularly visited the studio and there was absolutely no evidence | :05:07. | :05:11. | |
that occurred to me stop white one of the oddities they are looking at | :05:12. | :05:15. | |
the BBC, when you come into work there is a crowd of people here | :05:16. | :05:19. | |
outside radio one. Young people and often children. Today there are | :05:20. | :05:22. | |
young people in school uniforms. They are here hoping to catch sight | :05:23. | :05:28. | |
of stars. That is why it is so important the BBC needs good child | :05:29. | :05:33. | |
protection policies. So, how good is the BBC a child protection, now? | :05:34. | :05:38. | |
Well, Dame Janet Smith cited a third party review of the child protection | :05:39. | :05:43. | |
policies and there is a clear message from senior management in | :05:44. | :05:51. | |
courage and employees to raise their concerns. We will do more in regards | :05:52. | :05:55. | |
to whistle-blowing for staff, what they can do and must do and where | :05:56. | :06:00. | |
they can turn to to help. On child protection we will work with the | :06:01. | :06:03. | |
NSPCC to get their advice on how to help us build on what we are | :06:04. | :06:10. | |
currently doing. And we will, as Dame Janet asks, have another | :06:11. | :06:17. | |
independent audit to see how those policies are working in practice. | :06:18. | :06:21. | |
But one campaigner thinks the BBC's policies for child protection are | :06:22. | :06:25. | |
not strong enough. I see nothing of merit, nothing that requires staff | :06:26. | :06:29. | |
to report child abuse. Nothing that indicates abuse will be referred to | :06:30. | :06:34. | |
the Local Authority designated officer. I can see lots of people | :06:35. | :06:38. | |
who will be talked to, what experience they have in child | :06:39. | :06:41. | |
protection is a wonderment, I don't know. I'm not necessarily know that | :06:42. | :06:47. | |
the corporation who assembled this mess know either. Alongside the | :06:48. | :06:52. | |
Savile report there was one on Stuart Hall, another BBC abuser. | :06:53. | :06:58. | |
They found 21 victims and two missed chances to stop him. Two variations | :06:59. | :07:04. | |
today on a terrible story. The BBC letting young people down. Chris | :07:05. | :07:10. | |
Cook far. The BBC didn't want to put anyone up for our programme. | :07:11. | :07:13. | |
Dr Peter Scott-Morgan is a management consultant, | :07:14. | :07:14. | |
who in 2003 was brought in to the BBC to carry out a report | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
on its culture and practices for the corporation's bosses. | :07:19. | :07:20. | |
A little earlier I spoke to him about what he found. | :07:21. | :07:25. | |
Well, it was a time that the BBC was trying to bring in some new values. | :07:26. | :07:37. | |
Things like value for money and respect. So I was brought in over | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
about the year to interview a very large number of people to try and | :07:43. | :07:46. | |
understand what really was going on in the BBC. The unwritten rules, if | :07:47. | :07:50. | |
you like, how to behave, the advice you would get a friend, how to get | :07:51. | :07:54. | |
on and survive and so on. As a result of that various examples came | :07:55. | :08:03. | |
up, and quite early on. An example of some people being more valuable | :08:04. | :08:09. | |
than the values, being seen as so important that sometimes people | :08:10. | :08:12. | |
would put up with behaviour that maybe they wouldn't consider putting | :08:13. | :08:16. | |
up with in their normal lives. After a while, probably the fifth or sixth | :08:17. | :08:22. | |
interview, just as an example, somebody threw in and Jimmy Savile | :08:23. | :08:27. | |
likes young girls, and it just carried on like that. Almost just as | :08:28. | :08:32. | |
a joke. After awhile then picked it up, just as an example, along with | :08:33. | :08:38. | |
many others that had nothing to do with sexual abuse, and more and more | :08:39. | :08:47. | |
people would just nod with the Jimmy Savile reference and move on. Almost | :08:48. | :08:52. | |
as if it was an urban myth. I'm not sure many people necessarily | :08:53. | :08:56. | |
believed it in its entirety, but it was just one of those things that | :08:57. | :09:00. | |
certainly a lot of the people I spoke to, just joked about, as a | :09:01. | :09:04. | |
background to indicate what the place was like. | :09:05. | :09:09. | |
At the time it you weren't interpreting it as anything like we | :09:10. | :09:15. | |
now know Jimmy Savile was up to? It was very inappropriate, possibly | :09:16. | :09:20. | |
illegal, but certainly not rape, as you understood it at the time? | :09:21. | :09:26. | |
Absolutely not. Nor did I ever hear an example that strong. It was far | :09:27. | :09:32. | |
more with regards his predeliction for younger girls. | :09:33. | :09:36. | |
Did you report this or was it not that sort of job you are doing? Did | :09:37. | :09:43. | |
you report the specifics? Everyone had absolute | :09:44. | :09:46. | |
confidentiality, but what I did report was the pattern of what I | :09:47. | :09:50. | |
saw. That was the deal with everyone. They could tell me | :09:51. | :09:54. | |
absolutely anything off the record, but if there was a consistent | :09:55. | :09:59. | |
pattern, that I would share. Indeed, it in the summer of 2004, having | :10:00. | :10:05. | |
already fed back to a number of people, I fed back, I refer to them | :10:06. | :10:13. | |
to the top 300 people in the BBC, however they define top, and within | :10:14. | :10:17. | |
that one of the patterns that I shared was why there was | :10:18. | :10:25. | |
automatically a pressure for people to tolerate behaviour that otherwise | :10:26. | :10:28. | |
wouldn't be acceptable. Did that go right to the top of the | :10:29. | :10:33. | |
BBC, or the level where you wouldn't have heard of the people involved? | :10:34. | :10:39. | |
Certainly some of the people I fed back the overall pattern to, a far | :10:40. | :10:47. | |
more detailed and forensic version for what I had run through with you, | :10:48. | :10:51. | |
as to why you could understand there was pressure for people to not just | :10:52. | :10:56. | |
acts out, but then keep quiet about bullying behaviour, abusive | :10:57. | :11:05. | |
behaviour, that was discussed at all levels. The overall pattern. Indeed, | :11:06. | :11:13. | |
to Mark Thompson himself, because obviously that overall pattern, | :11:14. | :11:18. | |
apart from anything, Mark was in the presentation to the 300. But also of | :11:19. | :11:24. | |
course, I had one on ones with him about the overall pattern. The | :11:25. | :11:30. | |
context of that. For the life of me, before you ask, I cannot remember if | :11:31. | :11:36. | |
I used for Mark the same example I used for so many others and that | :11:37. | :11:40. | |
they picked up on. But I suspect, even if I had, to the other senior | :11:41. | :11:46. | |
people I fed back to, put in that context I earlier, I suspect that | :11:47. | :11:52. | |
many will be hearing it as an example of the sort of behaviour | :11:53. | :11:55. | |
that people conceptually would put up with and they would understand | :11:56. | :12:00. | |
that someone like Jimmy was absolutely more valuable than the | :12:01. | :12:04. | |
values. Did you find the BBC didn't listen | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
to what you said or did you just think they would carry on in their | :12:09. | :12:11. | |
merry old way because it was too difficult? | :12:12. | :12:15. | |
My conclusion was, not a lot is going to happen. But I think, albeit | :12:16. | :12:21. | |
with a bit of naivete, the reason that people were saying that was | :12:22. | :12:28. | |
that they thought, we put in a sort of whistle-blowing system, we are | :12:29. | :12:31. | |
training people exactly what sort of behaviour is a good, and therefore | :12:32. | :12:35. | |
that is a very interesting explanation of what was going on. | :12:36. | :12:40. | |
And thank goodness we have done those things so it won't happen | :12:41. | :12:44. | |
again. I happen not to believe that and I think may have glibly said, | :12:45. | :12:49. | |
what if anything happens, give me a ring in five years. I think Mark had | :12:50. | :12:55. | |
gone by then. Peter Scott-Morgan, very interesting. Thank you. | :12:56. | :12:56. | |
Pleasure. A remarkable drama is | :12:57. | :12:58. | |
playing out in the US. The state wants Apple to produce | :12:59. | :13:00. | |
a key that can unlock the phone of the San Bernadino jihadists, | :13:01. | :13:06. | |
a couple who killed 14 Apple, quite simply, | :13:07. | :13:08. | |
doesn't want there to be keys Big corporation takes | :13:09. | :13:12. | |
on big country. If you're using your smartphone, be | :13:13. | :13:27. | |
under no illusions, if government agencies really want to, they can | :13:28. | :13:31. | |
probably find a way in. Their arsenal of tricks and hacks is | :13:32. | :13:38. | |
growing. They can have big problems, though, if a phone is not being used | :13:39. | :13:43. | |
and is locked. That is the situation the FBI finds itself in with Syed | :13:44. | :13:54. | |
Rizwan Farook. Some believe the US government has been looking for such | :13:55. | :13:58. | |
a clear case to pick a fight with the technology companies. Is | :13:59. | :14:01. | |
particularly good turf for the Government in this case. You can see | :14:02. | :14:05. | |
why a magistrate, as has happened so far, would be inclined to grant the | :14:06. | :14:09. | |
Government's requires. It is why it is also really good in our system, | :14:10. | :14:14. | |
in the UK system and others, there is a chance to fully litigate and | :14:15. | :14:19. | |
ventilate this. Apple is rejecting to the initial order and filing | :14:20. | :14:24. | |
legal briefs with other member of the legal Judiciary Committee why | :14:25. | :14:28. | |
this is very bad president, even as probably all of us would like to get | :14:29. | :14:31. | |
in and see what is on that particular phone. The key that | :14:32. | :14:36. | |
protects the data on the phone is 256 alphanumeric characters long. | :14:37. | :14:41. | |
How safe is that? This is the number of possible combinations. It would | :14:42. | :14:45. | |
take more time than we have before the sun collapses to try even a | :14:46. | :14:49. | |
fraction of them using all the computers on earth simultaneously. | :14:50. | :14:51. | |
Obviously we don't enter such an computers on earth simultaneously. | :14:52. | :14:54. | |
enormous mega code every time you want a phone our mother. We use a | :14:55. | :15:00. | |
four digit pin code, maybe sometimes a bit longer, but that doesn't | :15:01. | :15:04. | |
unlock the phone but the mega code, which then decrypts our data. But | :15:05. | :15:08. | |
get that phone code wrong-un ten times in a row and all that data is | :15:09. | :15:12. | |
wiped, and there is nothing anyone can do to retrieve it. The FBI's | :15:13. | :15:18. | |
director was testifying to Congress today. He wants Apple to write some | :15:19. | :15:22. | |
software that allows officers to have as many goes as it takes to | :15:23. | :15:28. | |
guess the past code on the phone. I love Inc rich in and privacy. When I | :15:29. | :15:32. | |
hear corporation saying we were going to take you to walk when no | :15:33. | :15:35. | |
one can look at your stuff, I think that's great, I don't want anybody | :15:36. | :15:40. | |
looking at my stuff. But I step back and I think law-enforcement, which I | :15:41. | :15:44. | |
am part of, saves peoples lives, rescues kids and | :15:45. | :15:45. | |
am part of, saves peoples lives, terrorists and we do that a lot | :15:46. | :15:49. | |
through quarter orders that are search warrants, and a whole lot | :15:50. | :15:53. | |
through search warrants of mobile devices. Are going to move to a | :15:54. | :15:56. | |
world where that is possible in a more question mark it won't end but | :15:57. | :16:00. | |
it will be a different world to where we are today. But Apple is | :16:01. | :16:05. | |
fighting this request all the way. Their CEO says there is no such | :16:06. | :16:08. | |
thing as a back door only the good guys get to use. If we knew a way to | :16:09. | :16:15. | |
get the information on the phone that we have an order given, if we | :16:16. | :16:18. | |
knew a way to do this that would not expose hundreds and millions of | :16:19. | :16:23. | |
other people's issues, we would honestly do it. The only way we know | :16:24. | :16:26. | |
would be to write a piece of software that we view as the | :16:27. | :16:31. | |
software equivalent of cancer. We think it is bad news to write, we | :16:32. | :16:36. | |
would never write it, we have never written and that is what is at stake | :16:37. | :16:41. | |
here. According to opinion polls most Americans think Apple should | :16:42. | :16:44. | |
actually provide access to the phone. After all, is the logic, if | :16:45. | :16:49. | |
they are only after the terrorists and criminals, why should the rest | :16:50. | :16:53. | |
of us care? Is not just the Government that can access something | :16:54. | :16:58. | |
like this. One security is weakened, it is a nation state that wants to | :16:59. | :17:02. | |
access your private information, medical | :17:03. | :17:13. | |
information, banking is something to be concerned about. Cyber security | :17:14. | :17:16. | |
is really important. We are really only at the start of this battle. | :17:17. | :17:19. | |
Every year there are new smartphones released with better security built | :17:20. | :17:21. | |
in. For more businesses and individuals this is becoming the | :17:22. | :17:23. | |
main feature that they look for. Real test would be if there's an IS | :17:24. | :17:29. | |
should build next-generation phone that even Apple and other phones | :17:30. | :17:32. | |
can't get into. I think Apple would be capable of doing that. At that | :17:33. | :17:36. | |
point it puts it back to the Government, not of what they might | :17:37. | :17:42. | |
ask from Apple but what they want to pre-emptively ask of Apple and | :17:43. | :17:45. | |
others, saying you're not allowed to design the following kinds of | :17:46. | :17:49. | |
phones. Apple has until tomorrow to respond to the court order. Tonight | :17:50. | :17:53. | |
their lawyers have filed a counter motion. How all this plays out could | :17:54. | :17:58. | |
have a huge impact on everyone of us and how our high-tech societies | :17:59. | :17:59. | |
work. David Grossman there. It is a | :18:00. | :18:05. | |
fascinating dilemma. I'm joined now in the studio | :18:06. | :18:12. | |
by the journalist Edward Lucas who writes about | :18:13. | :18:15. | |
technology and security. And from Boston, Kade Crockford | :18:16. | :18:16. | |
who is director of Technology for Liberty and edits | :18:17. | :18:18. | |
the blog Privacy Matters. Kate, this is a game going, it | :18:19. | :18:23. | |
wasn't even his phone, it belonged to the Department of Health, his | :18:24. | :18:28. | |
employer, anti-killed 14 people. What is the best argument for not | :18:29. | :18:32. | |
trying to open up his phone? This isn't just about one phone, in fact | :18:33. | :18:39. | |
it isn't just about phones. If the F ERI succeeds here in obtaining this | :18:40. | :18:45. | |
broad president, it will essentially give the courts and law enforcement | :18:46. | :18:50. | |
agencies the power to issue demands on technology companies, not just | :18:51. | :18:57. | |
Apple, but also Microsoft, medical devices, even devices that haven't | :18:58. | :19:03. | |
yet been invented, to force these companies to send their users | :19:04. | :19:12. | |
malicious code that is signed as if it looks like it is coming from | :19:13. | :19:18. | |
Microsoft doesn't regular product of date, and that would harm physical | :19:19. | :19:20. | |
security from millions of people all around the globe. The War also | :19:21. | :19:25. | |
frankly harm US technology companies, because it would put them | :19:26. | :19:30. | |
at a disadvantage, enabling foreign companies to create secure products | :19:31. | :19:35. | |
that banks and manufacturers would prefer to use. But you are saying it | :19:36. | :19:41. | |
is a precedent. Why can't you just say, if a court says this, then we | :19:42. | :19:49. | |
cant it, but we weren't counted for the hundreds of millions that Tim | :19:50. | :19:54. | |
Cook took about, why not then say in cases like this we need a key but | :19:55. | :19:59. | |
not others? That is simply unprecedented, that is not how US | :20:00. | :20:03. | |
courts work. If a US court rules that in a criminal matter, the US | :20:04. | :20:07. | |
Government has a right to compel Apple to write malicious code to | :20:08. | :20:12. | |
serve to its devices, it can do so in every type of criminal | :20:13. | :20:15. | |
investigation, and that isn't even the subject of debate a more. The | :20:16. | :20:21. | |
FBI, members of law enforcement, have admitted they are seeking this | :20:22. | :20:26. | |
precedent. Let me put that Ed Lucas. In this case it was incredibly | :20:27. | :20:30. | |
clear-cut to a lot of people, but it is not about this case, it is about | :20:31. | :20:35. | |
many others. This is both a very specific case with some very big | :20:36. | :20:40. | |
general applications, but one has to be very careful about jumping from | :20:41. | :20:44. | |
one to the other. This is only possible because it is an obsolete | :20:45. | :20:48. | |
phone where this sort of hacking tool that Apple is being asked to | :20:49. | :20:52. | |
develop would actually work. If he had on a more up-to-date iPhone, | :20:53. | :21:00. | |
this wouldn't work. So it is quite a specific case. I can see why the | :21:01. | :21:04. | |
river to lobby is very worried about precedent, but this is actually not | :21:05. | :21:13. | |
mandating a general back door, ruling out encryption, trying to | :21:14. | :21:16. | |
undermine the whole way in which we depend on cryptography, it is a very | :21:17. | :21:22. | |
specific case, and one can't blame the FBI for choosing a case they are | :21:23. | :21:27. | |
going to win, but their arguments are strong. But the law doesn't work | :21:28. | :21:32. | |
in a way in which this can't be a precedent, Kate says. Is that right? | :21:33. | :21:38. | |
Can we say that in a small number of cases we don't want them -- don't | :21:39. | :21:43. | |
mind having a key, but they can't have Akiva millions of cases? If we | :21:44. | :21:51. | |
wanted to make them produce software that would bust open every modern | :21:52. | :21:57. | |
iPhone, Apple would go back to court and say that this contradicts the | :21:58. | :22:00. | |
fourth Amendment, there would be lots of other cases and aspects | :22:01. | :22:04. | |
coming into play. But here there is zero privacy, because the guy is | :22:05. | :22:09. | |
dead and he dead people don't have Agassi writes, and it wasn't his | :22:10. | :22:13. | |
phone. So on these very narrow grounds, you have to be careful | :22:14. | :22:16. | |
about saying this is a huge precedent. But that is not what the | :22:17. | :22:22. | |
case is about. It is not about whether the Government can give the | :22:23. | :22:29. | |
FBI access to a dead person's phone it is about whether the Government | :22:30. | :22:34. | |
can compel a software company to write code to subvert existing | :22:35. | :22:42. | |
security procedures. But the act which goes back to a few years after | :22:43. | :22:46. | |
the decade of independence -- declaration of independence gives a | :22:47. | :22:49. | |
broad pass to the authorities to ask people them, to help law | :22:50. | :22:54. | |
enforcement, and if you make saves, you may be in a position where the | :22:55. | :22:58. | |
government comes to you with a court order and says, make a skeleton key. | :22:59. | :23:03. | |
But that has never happened, and the case the Government relies on in it | :23:04. | :23:09. | |
re-that the court agreed with his that it is a very different kind of | :23:10. | :23:15. | |
case that has to do with telephone companies, installing a technology | :23:16. | :23:20. | |
to make available to the government information that that company | :23:21. | :23:24. | |
already processed as a central part of its business. Apple is a central | :23:25. | :23:29. | |
part of its business has said that it does not want to know what is on | :23:30. | :23:33. | |
your phone, privacy is a very central part of why Apple has | :23:34. | :23:38. | |
installed these encryption systems, so it is not camp arable at all. | :23:39. | :23:44. | |
Just looking at one point, would you supported if the Chinese Government | :23:45. | :23:48. | |
made a request like this, if it exceeds to an American Government | :23:49. | :23:53. | |
progress, isn't it then under pressure to accede to every request | :23:54. | :24:00. | |
in every jurisdiction? I think we have already seen these companies | :24:01. | :24:04. | |
rolling over under pressure from the Chinese Government, and it is | :24:05. | :24:12. | |
terrible, for instance the Yahoo employee who is in jail, and I wish | :24:13. | :24:18. | |
companies were tougher on the Chinese, but I wish they were more | :24:19. | :24:23. | |
obedient to American courts. I'm sorry, we are out of time. | :24:24. | :24:29. | |
Last year, the slogan "Black Lives Matter" was tweeted | :24:30. | :24:31. | |
Those three words came to be used as a protest against police killings | :24:32. | :24:35. | |
The phrase gained so much traction, many have wondered if it can't | :24:36. | :24:41. | |
transform itself into a broader civil rights movement. | :24:42. | :24:43. | |
This year, of course, sees a Presidential election. | :24:44. | :24:45. | |
Politics has taken some surprising turns and rage is in the air. | :24:46. | :24:47. | |
So could Black Lives Matter shift the American debate on race? | :24:48. | :24:50. | |
Mukul Devichand, the editor of BBC Trending, has been to the US | :24:51. | :24:53. | |
It is 2014 and Laquan McDonald, aged 17, is high and carrying a knife. | :24:54. | :25:11. | |
The rest of the police video was too graphic to show. | :25:12. | :25:14. | |
He falls after one bullet, but 15 more pierce his still body. | :25:15. | :25:19. | |
When it went viral there were street protests, | :25:20. | :25:21. | |
then a murder charge for the officer and the mayor, | :25:22. | :25:25. | |
Rahm Emanuel, sacking his police chief and apologising. | :25:26. | :25:35. | |
Black Lives Matter first trended during the Ferguson Missouri | :25:36. | :25:39. | |
protests in 2014, over the killing of an 18-year-old, | :25:40. | :25:41. | |
In the immediate aftermath I was just filled with rage | :25:42. | :25:48. | |
and I was sitting on my couch on a Friday night watching my social | :25:49. | :25:51. | |
media feed, just streamed these horrific images. | :25:52. | :25:55. | |
It looks like a war zone and it was incomprehensible to me | :25:56. | :25:58. | |
that this was happening five hours away from my home. | :25:59. | :26:03. | |
Black Lives Matter emerged in response to the extra judicial | :26:04. | :26:05. | |
killing of an armed black man by police. | :26:06. | :26:10. | |
An underlying anger had been unleashed. | :26:11. | :26:16. | |
Of the thousand-plus people killed by deadly police force across the US | :26:17. | :26:21. | |
last year, a disproportionate number were black. | :26:22. | :26:26. | |
Black civil rights movements changed America forever. | :26:27. | :26:28. | |
But the new generation say some of them sold out. | :26:29. | :26:33. | |
At some point the civil rights movement of our forefathers had | :26:34. | :26:36. | |
People had to get paid, people had to get jobs, | :26:37. | :26:44. | |
and that money came from outside of the black community. | :26:45. | :26:47. | |
I think that is part of the reason why the work did not go far enough. | :26:48. | :26:53. | |
Reverend Jesse Jackson, Chicago's giant of civil rights | :26:54. | :26:56. | |
history and a mentor to Barack Obama, used | :26:57. | :26:58. | |
Learn to live together, and not die apart in some foolish | :26:59. | :27:06. | |
If your focus is just to take over your local ethnic ward, | :27:07. | :27:16. | |
it will be folk in that ward, but if you want to take over | :27:17. | :27:19. | |
the city, the county, the state, you must see the role | :27:20. | :27:22. | |
in relation to other people who share the same grievances. | :27:23. | :27:25. | |
Urban, poor, high crime areas, like Chicago's south side, | :27:26. | :27:27. | |
Today's actions are about attracting new recruits to the movement. | :27:28. | :27:43. | |
We are riding the pink line through the south and west | :27:44. | :27:48. | |
White trigger and black face be life risking. | :27:49. | :27:55. | |
New cases emerging from all over the country mean | :27:56. | :28:01. | |
The Cedric case, the Laquan case, the Dakota case, the Ronald Johnson | :28:02. | :28:05. | |
case, all these cases are just straight cover-ups. | :28:06. | :28:07. | |
It's a pattern and practice of the Chicago Police Department. | :28:08. | :28:10. | |
I haven't got any, not only justice, but closure, information, | :28:11. | :28:14. | |
Panzy Edwards came here to lobby for her son Dakota Bright, | :28:15. | :28:25. | |
Teenagers can be armed here and the police | :28:26. | :28:31. | |
In many of these cases the police will maintain that they are people | :28:32. | :28:38. | |
who have been engaged in criminal activity, are known criminals, | :28:39. | :28:41. | |
could that be the case with your son? | :28:42. | :28:44. | |
They killed him for no reason, and they've got every excuse | :28:45. | :28:53. | |
in the world as to why they killed him. | :28:54. | :29:00. | |
It's sad, though, because they didn't hurt him, | :29:01. | :29:02. | |
The police union point out that it is dangerous work they do. | :29:03. | :29:12. | |
Over 200 people have been injured or killed in gun violence there, | :29:13. | :29:14. | |
I don't think our officers are involved in shooting quicker | :29:15. | :29:22. | |
Some of the worst neighbourhoods in this country are a stone's throw | :29:23. | :29:29. | |
I'm not going to put myself in jeopardy, to hesitate when deadly | :29:30. | :29:40. | |
But in the popularity contest that is the race | :29:41. | :29:43. | |
for the presidential nomination, Black Lives Matter issues | :29:44. | :29:45. | |
It has been heartbreaking and incredibly outraging to see | :29:46. | :29:49. | |
the constant stories of young men who have been killed | :29:50. | :29:57. | |
The father of shot teenager Michael Brown Jr is now a national | :29:58. | :30:02. | |
A federal investigation and a Grand Jury probe | :30:03. | :30:19. | |
into his son's killing recommended no charges be brought | :30:20. | :30:21. | |
Still, his father believes that the rebirth of black | :30:22. | :30:24. | |
radicalism, that his son's death helped inspired, | :30:25. | :30:26. | |
Mike opened those doors for other people, if not him, to get | :30:27. | :30:35. | |
We're tired, there isn't any more sitting down or sweeping the carpet. | :30:36. | :30:42. | |
We are standing on top of the carpet now. | :30:43. | :30:44. | |
Letting you know that we're not taking it any more. | :30:45. | :30:53. | |
There is nothing new about poor, urban black communities like this | :30:54. | :30:57. | |
taking issue with the criminal justice system. | :30:58. | :31:01. | |
But the fact that Black Lives Matter unites in protest across America | :31:02. | :31:05. | |
with each new killing, is an act of defiance | :31:06. | :31:07. | |
that is already affecting the national debate. | :31:08. | :31:13. | |
Well, joining me now from Washington DC is Danielle Belton, | :31:14. | :31:16. | |
And with me in the studio, Stafford Scott, co-ordinator | :31:17. | :31:29. | |
of Tottenham Rights and Race Advocacy Officer | :31:30. | :31:30. | |
What is the difference between Black Lives Matter and earlier vintages of | :31:31. | :31:46. | |
civil rights movements, do you think? I don't think that big a | :31:47. | :31:51. | |
difference. If you look at the movements you had a that night young | :31:52. | :31:59. | |
people like Julian Bond, were on the front lines fighting for liberation. | :32:00. | :32:02. | |
The same thing is happening now. It just seems different because so much | :32:03. | :32:06. | |
has changed and people's viewpoints have been coloured. People look the | :32:07. | :32:12. | |
style Joe Clee back at the civil rights movement, but I don't see | :32:13. | :32:16. | |
that much of a difference. Young people fighting for black | :32:17. | :32:19. | |
liberation, fighting for change and freedom. Hot hot Black Lives Matter | :32:20. | :32:27. | |
could change America, do you believe that? I believe it has in many ways. | :32:28. | :32:37. | |
They're talking about issues around incarceration and issues around | :32:38. | :32:43. | |
decriminalisation. I don't think we would be having these conversations | :32:44. | :32:46. | |
about police brutality and body cameras if it wasn't for the fact so | :32:47. | :32:50. | |
many people have taken to the streets demanding equality. To what | :32:51. | :32:56. | |
extent has it come to the UK? Root first of all I have to say, as | :32:57. | :33:03. | |
Danielle said, she was speaking about young people, I am not so | :33:04. | :33:09. | |
you're more into social media. But Black Lives Matter is important. I | :33:10. | :33:15. | |
think we spiritually support what the brothers and sisters are trying | :33:16. | :33:21. | |
to do in the USA. To some extent racism is a bigger issue in American | :33:22. | :33:24. | |
politics than British horror ticks, correct? They talk about it in the | :33:25. | :33:32. | |
USA and in the UK we have an English way of doing things, understated and | :33:33. | :33:35. | |
sometimes and an aisle of its existence. -- than British politics. | :33:36. | :33:47. | |
Because of the numbers of people being shot and killed by the state, | :33:48. | :33:53. | |
by police, it is obviously going to be a much more significant issue | :33:54. | :33:57. | |
there. But it is as significant for us here in the UK. As significant | :33:58. | :34:06. | |
for the parents for Mark Duggan. Can we talk about anger? You talked | :34:07. | :34:10. | |
about American politics, presidential elections, they are | :34:11. | :34:16. | |
talking about Black Lives Matter. But one of the notable features, the | :34:17. | :34:22. | |
white anger that has led to an outpouring of support for Donald | :34:23. | :34:25. | |
Trump. Is there a danger that everyone will end up shouting and no | :34:26. | :34:31. | |
one is going to be listening or hearing anything? A sort of | :34:32. | :34:33. | |
dysfunction in American politics, perhaps? There is always a level of | :34:34. | :34:39. | |
dysfunction in American politics. People are passionate and tensions | :34:40. | :34:44. | |
run high. This is an important election year. We have a very | :34:45. | :34:51. | |
un-directory stick - Mac uncharacteristic and boisterous | :34:52. | :34:53. | |
candidate in Donald Trump, whose comments are often perceived as | :34:54. | :35:01. | |
racist. I feel like the anger coming from the black matters... You are | :35:02. | :35:11. | |
upset about any want of the action and progress. You want to see your | :35:12. | :35:15. | |
politicians passed laws and make changes that will improve the lives | :35:16. | :35:18. | |
of black people everywhere in the United States and by extension, | :35:19. | :35:23. | |
other Americans. How dangerous do you think the Donald Trump movement, | :35:24. | :35:34. | |
how dangerous TUC that -- do you see that to the black course? I feel | :35:35. | :35:41. | |
like the discourse is kind of ugly and rather disgusting. It is | :35:42. | :35:46. | |
concerning to me but I don't think it will prevail in the long run. The | :35:47. | :35:52. | |
art of progress in the United States has always leaned towards getting | :35:53. | :35:57. | |
better in regards to race relations, having these conversations and | :35:58. | :36:02. | |
pushing for equality. So yes, things look bad, it sounds bad, but I don't | :36:03. | :36:06. | |
think the Donald Trumps of the world will win this one. How useful is | :36:07. | :36:14. | |
anger as a tall and how much does it scared the other side into counter | :36:15. | :36:19. | |
reacting? That is a great question, but is it the right question? For me | :36:20. | :36:28. | |
it is, is the anger justified? If anger is justified, the fact there | :36:29. | :36:34. | |
is a kick back, how can that then be justified? It cannot be justifiable. | :36:35. | :36:38. | |
If people are used to having privilege and are kicking back | :36:39. | :36:42. | |
because they don't want to share those privileges with less | :36:43. | :36:46. | |
advantaged people... And that only happens when you try to tell the | :36:47. | :36:50. | |
State and explain to the state what is happening to your community and | :36:51. | :36:56. | |
the state refuses to listen and denies and refuses to support or | :36:57. | :36:59. | |
assist. That is what happens in the UK. We saw the memo, the advice | :37:00. | :37:06. | |
given to Thatcher 30 years ago on how to deny our community any state | :37:07. | :37:11. | |
support or help. The impact of those decisions is something we as a | :37:12. | :37:17. | |
community living with today. I think anger is absolutely justified. It's | :37:18. | :37:21. | |
just a pity it has to be shown. We hope and pray we don't have a young | :37:22. | :37:24. | |
people being killed on the streets like we are seeing in the US, or | :37:25. | :37:31. | |
that anger will definitely be shown to people throughout this country, | :37:32. | :37:34. | |
regardless of their position. Thank you both very much. | :37:35. | :37:39. | |
There's a German equivalent of the Elgin Marbles: it's the bust | :37:40. | :37:41. | |
of the Egyptian Queen, Nefertiti which sits in a museum | :37:42. | :37:44. | |
in Berlin, rather than in the vicinity of its creator. | :37:45. | :37:46. | |
The bust was carved in the 14th century BC, and was found by German | :37:47. | :37:49. | |
archaeologists in 1912, who discovered the house | :37:50. | :37:51. | |
and workshop of the sculptor, a man named Thutmose. | :37:52. | :37:57. | |
Now the Egyptians would love to have the bust back, | :37:58. | :37:59. | |
but the Germans have guarded it jealously, | :38:00. | :38:02. | |
So it is pretty amazing that two artists have succeeded in taking | :38:03. | :38:08. | |
Here they are - secretly scanning - back in October last year. | :38:09. | :38:13. | |
Having done it, they can now in effect produce the formula | :38:14. | :38:16. | |
for anyone to make their own accurate copy of it. | :38:17. | :38:21. | |
Well, Nora al-Badri, one of those artists, | :38:22. | :38:23. | |
A very good evening to you. I am fascinated what planning and | :38:24. | :38:34. | |
execution went into this. Take us through how you did it. OK, I will | :38:35. | :38:40. | |
try. It was a huge collaborative effort. We had archaeologists | :38:41. | :38:46. | |
working with us, as well as lawyers. In the end it took us only one-day. | :38:47. | :38:56. | |
Two visits over six hours, circling around and collecting all the data | :38:57. | :39:02. | |
that we then processed. It sounds a bit like oceans 11 or one of these | :39:03. | :39:07. | |
movies. In the film at something has to almost go wrong before the plan | :39:08. | :39:11. | |
is finished. Did anything almost go wrong whilst you were there? No, | :39:12. | :39:17. | |
because we had the advantage of surprise, I would say. Nobody was | :39:18. | :39:21. | |
expecting anyone scanning with a device. What I don't understand, | :39:22. | :39:27. | |
this thing is obviously guarded and you must have been fairer a few | :39:28. | :39:32. | |
hours. How did you not get caught? -- must have been there. How did you | :39:33. | :39:38. | |
disguise yourself? We were very careful. The guards, they are doing | :39:39. | :39:42. | |
a great job and protecting from taking photos and they are only | :39:43. | :39:48. | |
looking for photographs. The audience was the visitors, the other | :39:49. | :39:51. | |
ones who were there didn't really see us or catch us, because there is | :39:52. | :39:58. | |
a selective perception which happens when you focus so much on sculpture. | :39:59. | :40:05. | |
Your point was that really some of these ancient artefacts should go | :40:06. | :40:11. | |
back to their home, correct? Our point was more about activating | :40:12. | :40:15. | |
artefacts from archaeological and so-called ethnic collections, which | :40:16. | :40:20. | |
means bringing them alive somehow to a new discourse and critically | :40:21. | :40:26. | |
reassess the conditions of today and the whole notion of belonging and | :40:27. | :40:33. | |
possession. It is not so much about restitution, having it here or | :40:34. | :40:36. | |
there, because this is a very redundant discussion. It went | :40:37. | :40:44. | |
nowhere. A very complicated answer, but you do think the Germans should | :40:45. | :40:49. | |
give it back, or not? At the moment I wouldn't say that is so clear, | :40:50. | :40:54. | |
because we are working on other narratives and new imaginary is, if | :40:55. | :41:01. | |
you like. Talking about data, what we did, this is actually something | :41:02. | :41:05. | |
that we would amount from the Museum, to make open access to | :41:06. | :41:11. | |
everyone as a first step. Thank you very much. | :41:12. | :41:14. | |
That's it for tonight, but we leave you with Professor David Crystal, | :41:15. | :41:16. | |
who's discovered over many years that our national failure to perform | :41:17. | :41:19. | |
Shakespeare with authentic Elizabethan pronunciation and accent | :41:20. | :41:21. | |
means we're missing a lot of the jokes - | :41:22. | :41:24. | |
plus it doesn't rhyme the way it should. | :41:25. | :41:27. | |
So he's publishing his own guide on how to say Shakespeare properly. | :41:28. | :41:31. | |
Here he is as John Gower, or John Goorrr if you like, | :41:32. | :41:34. | |
To sing a song that old was sung, from ashes ancient Gower is come. | :41:35. | :41:50. | |
Assuming man's infirmities to glad your ears and please your eyes. | :41:51. | :41:55. | |
It hath been sung at festivals, | :41:56. | :42:00. | |
on ember eves and holy days. | :42:01. | :42:02. | |
And lords and ladies in their lives have read it for restoraties. | :42:03. | :42:11. | |
when wits more ripe accept my rhymes, | :42:12. | :42:19. | |
and that to hear an old man sing would to your wishes pleasure bring. | :42:20. | :42:26. | |
I life would wish, and that I might waste it for you like taper light. | :42:27. | :42:31. |