01/11/2015 The Papers

Scottish Labour has backed Jeremy Corbyn's stance on nuclear deterrent

by voting to scrap Trident, which is at odds with the wider UK party.

Hello and welcome to a look ahead to the papers. There is still time.

Let's look at the front pages. We will start with a Financial Times.

The paper says the result is a triumph for president Erdogan. The

Metro has a striking picture of a child's shoe. The Guardian has a

warning from a leading Tory MP that new surveillance plans will only be

backed by MPs face include some form of judicial consent. The Telegraph

leads with research that won't fall cancers are diagnosed A

departments. This paper says that couples are increasingly going to be

denied fertility treatment. The Daily Express says that a new blood

test will help identify people at risk of diabetes. Let's look at the

situation in Turkey. Here it is on the FT. They keep's ruling party

sweeps to victory. The HK party gains a clear party in a national

election but the president falls short of a supermajority. The polls

were not expecting them to get this close even, to this kind of result.

No, it's been a surprise result and you have seen his supporters

triumphant, of course, because they were not expecting it either. It is

a conclusive victory for Erdogan and his party. Five months ago, they had

a hung election. There has been an stability since then and three big

explosions blamed on Islamic state. There have been conflict with the

Kurdish area. And a peace march, when 100 people were killed. There

is a theory that because it was hung, the critics would say that

what has happened is that Erdogan has stirred things up and created a

need for a strongman, which he is, and generated that instability

within the country. Whether that is exactly accurate not depends. But

it's a difficult situation in Turkey at the moment hand perhaps now we

need to see how he will react to that. There was a very partial media

before that we have a bit of a partial media as well in this

country. He has definitely done well. But it says here, in the

Financial Times, that he may be tantalisingly short of his

supermajority. Why does he need this supermajority? It's all about a

referendum. Because he would like to change the constitution so he can

have a presidential republic like in France. He has already done the

three terms as Prime Minister and now, he is having a term as a

president. He would like to carry on as president. They appear to like

strong men in Turkey. I have been to stumble only and I don't know if

that counts as Turkey. I was only there twice at the weekend, working.

The streets were full of men and presumably, the women were at home

having children. I am very much hoping that he does get his way and

this becomes more open to women, this sighting. He has taken it the

other way. It has become more conservative under his rule. It was

famously secular but there has been controversy since he came to power

over that very issue. This alleged move against the secular traditions

of Turkey. I was hoping he might be listening. You never know. We will

send him a copy. Let's stay with the FT and look at another story. Fear

rise of lawsuits over gender pay a quality move. This is the decision

by the government that they want bonuses that are paid to men and

women, large companies are going to have to publish that information and

that can of information is important to women who feel they might be

underpaid compared with ML counterpoints. Amazingly, this

government wants equal pay for equal work and I think so do we. Companies

are fearful that we are actually going to sue to get it. I am

speaking like I am talking about half of women here. The law has been

in place of 40 years and the should not be the need for this

publication, should there? It has not been happening at this

government is doing its best by the sounds of things to get women's vote

the next time round. They are wanting... For companies to be

fearful... This isn't just about bonuses. It's about the proposal

that all companies over 250 employees should publish their pay.

The initial proposal was straightforward average pay between

men and women in larger companies. He has expanded it to the public

sector. When those figures, they haven't said how they are going to

calculate the monkey was going to be included and so on, but when they

get the point of those actual figures being published and of

course it is likely to show, because there are more men in senior in

companies... Yes, and more women in lower positions. That is what they

are worried about. It's very difficult for companies to resolve

these differentials overnight. It is. But for them to be saying they

are fearful. They have been asked to do this for 40 years. The question

is, how exactly it is defined and what the reasons are for people

being at different levels. The devil is in the detail about how they

calculate these pay audits and how they're going to be published. Lots

for lawyers to argue about. Let's move on to the i. IVF on the NHS

under threat. Why so? According to the i, sum of commissioning groups

that commission your health services are going stop funding will stop at

the moment, Nice says that you should get three rounds, three

cycles of IVF if you have fertility problems. And apparently, something

like a third of women go on to have a baby, or couples, rather. Some

areas of the country are now saying we are so strapped for cash, we are

not going to give you three cycles. They used to be a lottery about this

as to where you lived in the country. Now, and every area of the

country, they will give you one cycle but that is being cut back. I

think infertility, for a lot of couples, should be regarded as an

illness. It's very expensive if you go privately. Well, it is. If you're

having a discussion, should say I have a child. Personally, I don't

think that if money is limited and there is a question about that,

maybe it shouldn't be spent on older people who cannot... I'm not sure it

is an absolute right for people to have a child. And you can find

Martin on Twitter for your replies. We are a broad church. We can cope

with that difference of opinion. On the Telegraph, one in four cancers

diagnosed in A When it is diagnosed, often because nurses is

not good for people. -- prognosis. It says here a lot of people are not

been diagnosed quickly enough. Part of that sometimes is down to the

fault of doctors not having done it. It seems to be saying that it's not

100% clear, that a lot of it is down to individuals and men are probably

worse, not reacting soon enough, or recognising symptoms. When they are

actually go to the GP or the hospital, it's almost too late.

There is an element here in which the signs are not being picked up by

people and people themselves... I feel you were saying, some of the

education around this is not as good as it should be. When I was on

Watchdog, 25 years ago, I was diagnosed with advanced bowel

cancer. I'd not even heard of it and it was the most common cancer in

Europe. We are bad getting the message over in this country. What

is the answer? We have an inverse relationship between the number of

enormous cancer charities we have and the fact they put out

information like tiredness and losing weight for my disease. If I

waited until I was tired of losing weight, and this is mentioned in

here, I would be dead by now. We have to get better at telling people

what the symptoms are. I didn't think the campaign was very good.

Having said that, it's odd. In one sense we are being told that far too

many people are going to GPs and they are being inundated. At the

same time, this story suggests people are not doing enough. Some

people need to go more often. GPs are not giving enough training.

30,000 people a month are looking for bowel cancer. We should be

helping people to check what the symptoms are better, before they go

to the GP. Let's go to the Metro. This is awful. This picture is sad.

Crash experts discover plane disintegrated. The suggestion is

this plane which crashed yesterday actually broke up in midair. The

picture here is just heartbreaking. It's a picture of a child's shoe

amongst the record. -- wreckage. It personalises it because somebody is

going to recognise that shoe. This is... We don't know what caused it

yet but it sounds as though it may have been some kind of terrible

mechanical failure because it fell straight out of the sky. The picture

is in a lot of papers and you can recognise luggage and so on. In

Britain, this is 220 families that are affected. Egypt was quick to say

yesterday that they thought it was down to some kind of technical

fault, not terrorism. We will have to wait for the investigation. I

don't think they have any idea to be frank and they were saying that...

They were saying, don't say it is terrorism. It would be catastrophic

for the tourist industry, which Russians have been helping to

support in a big way. A lot of other countries, including our own, people

are not going to as much as they were. The Russians have been going.

This might affect that if it is terrorism. The reports are tonight

as the has been a tail strike in 2001, which would have weakened...

The tail hit the runway when it landed. There have been repairs on

the of that plane. If it had found that, and I don't think he knew that

the time, if it had had that previous accident, it weakens the

fuel is large and expose it to disaster. I suppose it would be

better if it is mechanical failure, rather than terrorism. They have the

black box. A comment on the Daily Express. This is the ex-servicemen

and women who have walked across Britain. Yes, with a lot of

disabilities between them as well. I saw him on your news channel hugging

the men as they were coming in and hugging the women. But I thought,

gosh, it is nice to see a royal who is being so emotional. I met his

mother a couple of times and she was great for hugging people. I think

the Royals could do themselves goodbye hugging a few more people.

It's an extraordinary effort by these men and women. Harry and women

-- William are involved in this. I had forgotten because I thought you

were talking about the Queen, but you were talking about Diana. The

Queen has never had me! That would be something. That's it for the

Papers for this hour. Lynn and Martin will be back again at

11:30pm. Stay with us here on BBC News. At 11 o'clock, the latest on

the plane crashing Egypt, in which 224 people were killed, including 17

children. Now, it's time for