18/11/2015 The Papers

Cup next year, but he says he still wants to play as well. That is

coming up in Sportsday in the next 15 minutes, straight after The

Papers. Hello there and welcome to our look ahead to what The Papers

will bring us tomorrow. Let's have a look at the front pages. The

Republic strikes back. After a major police operation in Paris in the

early hours of this morning. An French police are on the front of

the Financial Times there. The Telegraph claims David Cameron is to

get a plane with ?10 million for use on long haul government trips.

Migrants hoping to come to the UK to join their spouse must learn to

speak English first, according to a court ruling reported in the

express. The Paris police raids are the main story on the front of the

Metro. It claims Charles de Gaulle airport could have been the next

target for the attackers. The Guardian highlights the uncertainty

of whether the alleged ringleader of the attacks was one of those killed

in the raid this morning. We will start with the eye. The Republic

strikes back. Islamic State mastermind killed in Paris police

raid, intelligence sources say. It is not clear that is the case. We

are not sure if that is the case, but what an amazing story. A

seven-hour siege. The entire apartment building appears to have

been blown up. It is like something out of die-hard. The Metro has a

similar eye-catching cover. The Republic strikes back, terminator

terminated. They are both showing defiance at what has happened in

Paris. The Republic strikes back. Lots of question still present abode

failures when it comes to the French authorities. They are playing catch

up. They are. They do not know how this guy went from Syria, they do

not know how he got back again, how he masterminded this from Belgium

and ended up in a flat in Paris. From what we are reading, it sounds

like the lead to this flat was evidence from the concert hall.

Revenge is an extraordinarily powerful feeling and that would be a

sense of catharsis from this. A lot of people in France will be we are

doing something at last. But this is a firefight in a suburb in a major

city. It is an extraordinary event. After five days of extraordinary

events and we are still having these major, major incidents and this I

say as the music man, news stories as well. They were plotting an

another attack on the Charles de Gaulle airport, the second busiest

airport in Europe. They were tempted to wait to see them going into

operation, but the thought that would be too dangerous. They ended

up going in and as we know the ringleaderAPPLAUSE

Cousin blew herself up with a suicide belt and it appears that she

was trying to put herself off as someone who was innocent and the

security forces were smart enough to not trust it and then she blew

herself up. They stopped what would have been a

horrific follow up. I think it was good intelligence. The suggestion

here from two papers that the supposed ringleader, the mastermind

of the attacks last Friday, that he is somehow dead as a result of that

raid this morning. Let's go to the Guardian. Police attack group that

was ready to strike. You mention the business district and Charles de

Gaulle as well. That is the real fear, that as long as the prime

suspects, two of them, are still on the run then more attacks could well

be being planned. This is the big question. How many heads did this

Hydra have? We do not know how extensive the Islamic State

operation on mainland Europe is war in the UK. We do not know how well

coordinated it is. It could be that each time they will seek revenge

themselves if they feel the French police and security services are

making progress in tracking them down. There are big questions about

the comparison between British security services and French

security services. Are we better or worse? We do not know. They had

Charlie Hebdo and yet it is France which has been targeted again. There

are questions, without slurring the authorities in France, about our

date using the same techniques we are using at GCHQ, do they have the

right powers they need to do surveillance without infringing on

the word liberty, which is at the heart of the French way of life.

These are difficult questions for the French government. Can I just

picked up on the one part of the Guardian story? We are both

intrigued by the front page of the Guardian. Why did they put the

mustard in the middle. It looks a little strange. They did this last

night as well. We are talking about it and that was the idea. In

particular, the French president repeating to the French Mayers that

him saying France is in a war. They were targeting what France

represents. I had that because when I was at the State Department, the

US was widely condemned for Bush using the words that we were at

war. This was after September 11. I still have people say, the problem

is that Bush should never have called it a war and the response was

what would you call it when you are attacked? It is also not a police

menu fur, you are not sending individuals to get evidence, it is

not a crime scene for fingerprints, you are at war and that put you on a

different setting. It is fascinating that the French have gone straight

into the war paradigms the same as the US did. Does it take a direct

attack on the homeland for that happened? We had seven July. We did

not use the word war. It is just interesting that Francois Hollande

has used it and used it consistently. I also note that there

are still quite a few people in hospital. 195. 41 in intensive care.

Three on life support. There are still thoughts and prayers needed.

They have only now established the identities of everyone who died. The

front of the Telegraph. The key EU border scandal. This man was the

alleged ringleader. How did he get to Paris question what he was

supposed to be in Syria, he seemed to come and go freely. Questions

here about the EU borders. This is the issue of Schengen, of having

open borders, the free movement zone within mainland Europe. Britain is

not part of it. Is it sustainable? Is it sustainable because if you can

enter through Greece or hungry just to pick two countries at random and

end up in Paris to carry out a terrorist atrocity, can that be

continued? The European Union have said that Schengen should state, it

has advantages for the majority of people. Anyone who has gone on

holiday where you can drive across the border from Holland into Germany

or from Belgium to France, it is a wonderful thing. You are now coming

up against whether we had to sacrifice our liberties to stop a

minority and that is a difficult question. That is precisely what

they want. The Telegraph is fairly Eurosceptic and they have gone with

this because it is a way of attacking Europe as well. I can

understand why they have done that. This is not just about Schengen

itself, but the whole structure of the European Union. Is that also

sustainable? The European Union is still sustainable. Just because they

taken the borders during this difficult time, I do not think that

brings down the whole EU project. You can still have free movement of

goods and services but say we will have stronger border controls during

this time. I think the European Commission indicating that they will

resist any attempt to try to strengthen border security at this

time is not politically the best thing for them to say. They need to

say that take another look at this, let's look at what we can do in

these serious times. White not? It is the cornerstone of European

integration as far as the French and Germans see it. It just means that

we still have to go through security check at the airport. Why can't that

be done at the border? Then it is not a free movement zone, is it?

You'd still need a passport. Just like we do at the airport. We still

have two show our passports. How long have we got? Interest rates

will rise. I am more interested in Cameron and his playing. I am an

expert on this. I have flown on a plane with Tony Blair, with Gordon

Brown and with the David Cameron. We are the only leading nation which

does not have our own play in for the Prime Minister. We do not have

an Air Force One. Tony Blair signed off for two U aeroplanes, one for

the Royal family, one for the Prime Minister. Gordon Brown said we

cannot afford this and cut it off. I have landed at word summits and you

go down the land -- line and you have the changing plane and all

these jumbos and we have this tiny little thing. Downing Street

chartered a plane from an American chain of bars. We turned up in a

plane from this company. I have also shown an extraordinarily expensive

private jet they have charted. One I bought it and they asked if I wanted

champagne. The bottom line is that David Cameron will get his own

aeroplane. There are a lot of people will say that if you are making

cuts, you cannot get a private plane. It saves money at the end of

the day. It is surprising, but it saves money. We will be back in an

hour. We were at the latest on the police raid in Paris following the

terrorist attacks in the French capital. For now, it is time for