Browse content similar to 17/01/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
of the redundancies expected at the port Talbot site. And coming up, we | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
explore the growing murky for robotic pets. -- the growing market. | :00:00. | :00:19. | |
Welcome to our look ahead to the morning's papers. The front pages, | :00:20. | :00:32. | |
starting with the express. It leads with Britain's future in the EU, | :00:33. | :00:36. | |
saying there is growing support for Britain to leave. The Telegraph, the | :00:37. | :00:44. | |
main headline, GP waiting lists. It says 10 million patients struggle to | :00:45. | :00:47. | |
get appointments and record numbers wait over a week. The times, the | :00:48. | :00:53. | |
plans of David Cameron to integrate Muslim woman into mainstream society | :00:54. | :00:58. | |
including English classes for migrants. The Guardian, plans by the | :00:59. | :01:01. | |
NHS to watch a sugar attacks on British hospitals. The Daily Mail, | :01:02. | :01:06. | |
mounting pressure on Scotland Yard to apologise to award at Bramall | :01:07. | :01:10. | |
after child abuse allegations were dropped. -- to Lord Bramall. We | :01:11. | :01:18. | |
start with an interesting front page on the Sun about Jeremy Corbyn's | :01:19. | :01:21. | |
idea for the Trident submarine fleet. There fears, trapped a | :01:22. | :01:31. | |
missile. It has a hat on. | :01:32. | :01:37. | |
It is not a very good pun. Not one of their best. | :01:38. | :01:42. | |
They have not got a lot to work with. We can tell what they think of | :01:43. | :01:47. | |
it. We can, but it is wilfully | :01:48. | :01:52. | |
misunderstanding. The subject of Trident is up for review, many | :01:53. | :01:58. | |
options are being considered, we don't know what all of them, but one | :01:59. | :02:03. | |
of them is to to avert potential job losses from scrapping Trident. That | :02:04. | :02:09. | |
has come up, whereby you would retain the capability that you would | :02:10. | :02:14. | |
not actually have the warheads. The capacity to fire them, but not the | :02:15. | :02:19. | |
actual warheads. Which is not as daft as it sounds, as long as you | :02:20. | :02:24. | |
are still within Nato. It depends what kind of nuclear deterrent you | :02:25. | :02:29. | |
want. I thought he was a principled | :02:30. | :02:33. | |
unilateralist who wanted nothing to do with nuclear weapons because they | :02:34. | :02:37. | |
are a moral abomination. To say that in an -- the event of a war we are | :02:38. | :02:45. | |
here to fire them if you need is two, that is not unilateralism. And | :02:46. | :02:50. | |
it's a nonsense of the point of having Trident. Trident has a ship | :02:51. | :03:01. | |
permanently and patrolling so that within minutes it can act in a | :03:02. | :03:04. | |
crisis. But if you don't have bombs on the submarine cannot act within | :03:05. | :03:09. | |
minutes. So the idea of an immediate response from Britain within Nato is | :03:10. | :03:13. | |
undermined, so it does not serve anyone. | :03:14. | :03:17. | |
It is wilfully misunderstanding the conversation, not you, I hasten to | :03:18. | :03:22. | |
add... I am sympathetic to him try to find | :03:23. | :03:26. | |
a way through this. It is almost as if, you would have | :03:27. | :03:30. | |
to be not to get rid of Trident. Yet all defence officials have in saying | :03:31. | :03:34. | |
that Trident is not an effective deterrent -- you would have to be | :03:35. | :03:43. | |
nuts. It is not a deterrent to the risks we face such as terrorism, it | :03:44. | :03:48. | |
is an obsolete counter to that. So let's try to find alternatives. | :03:49. | :03:54. | |
Because claiming that Trident is an effective deterrent is a redundant | :03:55. | :03:56. | |
conversation. The Telegraph asks whether it would | :03:57. | :04:01. | |
be any kind of deterrent at all. It probably wouldn't. He is trying | :04:02. | :04:10. | |
to deter the Blairites from revolting against him. I like the | :04:11. | :04:13. | |
fact he is a man of principle. I don't share them but it is good to | :04:14. | :04:18. | |
have somebody who has got some. What a pity, having won the massive | :04:19. | :04:22. | |
mandate he cannot say, I don't believe we should have nuclear | :04:23. | :04:25. | |
weapons, they did not help us out in the Falklands, the Gulf War, Iraq, | :04:26. | :04:29. | |
they are no longer needed, the Cold War is over, my promises to get rid | :04:30. | :04:34. | |
of them. There are trade unions worried about jobs. MPs who | :04:35. | :04:39. | |
represent the yards that house Trident. Of course they don't want | :04:40. | :04:42. | |
to get rid of them. So why not to say, you know what, I'm taking a | :04:43. | :04:48. | |
bold stance, that is rid of the nukes -- to get rid of. | :04:49. | :04:57. | |
The times, Cameron tells Muslims women must integrate, is this a good | :04:58. | :05:01. | |
thing, or interference where it is not needed? | :05:02. | :05:05. | |
It is hard to tell, I have not seen the editorial. I am in two minds | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
about this. On the one hand many people are concerned that there are | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
people in the country who have not integrated into western | :05:15. | :05:18. | |
understandings of women's rights. And the idea that because society is | :05:19. | :05:23. | |
too worried about saying something politically incorrect that it will | :05:24. | :05:25. | |
not challenge things which go against not just Western tradition | :05:26. | :05:31. | |
but also our laws, when it comes to things like female genital | :05:32. | :05:34. | |
mutilation. It is right that the government should say to new | :05:35. | :05:38. | |
immigrants, there is a list of standards of behaviour we expect. On | :05:39. | :05:43. | |
the other hand, having said that, a defining principle of being British | :05:44. | :05:46. | |
is that you are left alone unless you break the law. And when Cameron | :05:47. | :05:50. | |
says he wants to overturn what he says is passive tolerance, I think | :05:51. | :05:58. | |
he is overturning a cornerstone of the relationship between the British | :05:59. | :06:01. | |
individual and the state, which is that you are left alone unless you | :06:02. | :06:04. | |
break the law. I find it hard to stomach, coming | :06:05. | :06:08. | |
from Cameron, specifically targeting Muslim woman. He is simultaneously | :06:09. | :06:17. | |
closing woman's refuge centres. For female victims of domestic abuse. So | :06:18. | :06:22. | |
you suddenly care about women now? Muslim women? I think you would | :06:23. | :06:27. | |
probably find that most people who migrate to the UK wants to learning | :06:28. | :06:29. | |
good. But a lot of them haven't. This | :06:30. | :06:34. | |
would surely at least give a woman the option of knowing what was out | :06:35. | :06:37. | |
there, what opportunities exist for them... | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
But those opportunities are not out there from him, that is the point, | :06:43. | :06:47. | |
he has not provided opportunities, schools for learning | :06:48. | :06:49. | |
foreign-language is quite the opposite, those services are being | :06:50. | :06:53. | |
cut along with everything else. If you provided that access you could | :06:54. | :06:57. | |
then say, are you aware of this resource? They cannot cut it and | :06:58. | :07:00. | |
then say they should be getting access to it at the same time. | :07:01. | :07:05. | |
The Telegraph, millions waiting longer to see a GP. I feel I have | :07:06. | :07:09. | |
been reading these headlines for a long time. Is it getting worse or | :07:10. | :07:13. | |
staying the same? I don't know if it is getting worse | :07:14. | :07:16. | |
but more than 10 million patients are struggling to gain appointment. | :07:17. | :07:20. | |
Again I think this is related to cuts. If you cut social services you | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
but an additional burden on the NHS which would not otherwise be there. | :07:27. | :07:32. | |
And as you say this is a continuous story about the NHS struggling in | :07:33. | :07:39. | |
the face of an onslaught and being squeezed by cuts to cope with an | :07:40. | :07:44. | |
expanding demand. But I think this story is slanted in a way to suggest | :07:45. | :07:51. | |
that people want surgery to be open out of hours on the weekends. And, | :07:52. | :07:55. | |
you know, therefore that should be made possible. I don't think it is | :07:56. | :08:01. | |
slanted. From reading it. That is where it is going. | :08:02. | :08:07. | |
But if it is slanted I would not have a problem with that, because it | :08:08. | :08:11. | |
highlights an unacceptable rise of people waiting a couple of weeks. | :08:12. | :08:16. | |
And picks up on the fact that receptionists can be rude. There are | :08:17. | :08:19. | |
issues of funding and there are issues of management. | :08:20. | :08:24. | |
And issues of manners. Manners as well. There are some | :08:25. | :08:30. | |
reports showing that do not match what people expect from the NHS. | :08:31. | :08:35. | |
This is partly due to very generous contracts that Labour negotiated. | :08:36. | :08:38. | |
Partly due to the fact that there aren't staff at weekends, which is | :08:39. | :08:41. | |
what the government is trying to work with right now, either way, | :08:42. | :08:45. | |
funding, yes, but I think this points to questions about how people | :08:46. | :08:49. | |
manage their surgeries. Should we not change the | :08:50. | :08:52. | |
expectations of doctors? That it won't be 9-to-5? GPs, I mean. | :08:53. | :08:58. | |
Because of course, in hospitals, many doctors claim they work | :08:59. | :09:01. | |
round-the-clock. I don't get this suggestion that GPs | :09:02. | :09:04. | |
are saying they don't seem to need to work extra hours. But then used | :09:05. | :09:13. | |
to be more funding. If they are overstretched they will start making | :09:14. | :09:16. | |
mistakes, which no body wants. The express, the headline, Britain | :09:17. | :09:22. | |
is ready to quit the EU. Huge boost for the leave campaign. Whereas this | :09:23. | :09:25. | |
boost come from? A new opinion poll giving a | :09:26. | :09:31. | |
cessation of 6-point lead to the exit. I am thrilled by that. Why? | :09:32. | :09:40. | |
Because I want to leave the EU. I have my cards on the table. If you | :09:41. | :09:45. | |
read on page five, the express makes a link between the desire of people | :09:46. | :09:49. | |
to leave and they sort of foreign policy crisis taking place in | :09:50. | :09:52. | |
Europe. Refugee crisis, the terrorist attacks. That is | :09:53. | :09:57. | |
interesting because pro Europeans could argue that being a member of | :09:58. | :10:01. | |
the EU actually helps when it comes to security, but they could also | :10:02. | :10:04. | |
argue that because we are not members of the Schengen zone we are | :10:05. | :10:07. | |
outside of the issue of how one deals with refugees. Britain is | :10:08. | :10:12. | |
already cauterised from that. It is frustrating for somebody who wants | :10:13. | :10:16. | |
to see the EU debated on the basis of economics because I think there | :10:17. | :10:20. | |
is a business case for leaving. But also on the basis of sovereignty. It | :10:21. | :10:25. | |
is frustrating, I fear this referendum will be all about | :10:26. | :10:27. | |
immigration and terrorism. It really should not be. | :10:28. | :10:33. | |
That is the way that the far right has presented it, to be fair. | :10:34. | :10:38. | |
I don't think it is the far right doing it. | :10:39. | :10:42. | |
We can argue about the definition but people are reacting to austerity | :10:43. | :10:47. | |
and the threat of terror and a perceived threat of migrant drains | :10:48. | :10:54. | |
on jobs and resources, which actually is a fair and of fear, a | :10:55. | :10:58. | |
time of austerity, has a few worried about your job, you will be worried | :10:59. | :11:03. | |
about somebody taking it. But they are not the target, migrants are not | :11:04. | :11:07. | |
the target. I would personally rather we stayed in Europe but made | :11:08. | :11:11. | |
it more democratic and accountable. And progressive. Because I do think | :11:12. | :11:15. | |
freedom of movement is important. And I think the baseline of work | :11:16. | :11:19. | |
-labour arrangements we have aren't And I think the baseline of work | :11:20. | :11:26. | |
-labour arrangements we have -- are great, and if we didn't have them, | :11:27. | :11:28. | |
this government would very quickly take them away. | :11:29. | :11:35. | |
The NHS to introduce a sugar tax. Internally. Not dependent on the | :11:36. | :11:42. | |
Treasury. How will they do it? Sorry, really rude, but I just want | :11:43. | :11:45. | |
to throw in, because I'm so staggered by this, it is the | :11:46. | :11:48. | |
weirdest front page I have ever seen. | :11:49. | :11:52. | |
Tell us why in a moment. Rachel, tell us what they are planning. | :11:53. | :11:57. | |
It will be internal, only operational in hospitals, which I | :11:58. | :12:01. | |
worry will only affect visitors like us who come in and want a sugary | :12:02. | :12:04. | |
snack. So they will make a sugary snacks in | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
the cafe too expensive to bother with? | :12:09. | :12:12. | |
Yes, yes. But I think it is more of a statement, you know, this is what | :12:13. | :12:18. | |
the government should be doing. A potential advisory thing. I don't | :12:19. | :12:22. | |
know how impactful discount to be. Why is it a weird front page? | :12:23. | :12:38. | |
The colour. I am not being odd! But it looks like clip art. It is a | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
weird nonstory about the NHS charging you a bit more for | :12:43. | :12:45. | |
something in the cafe. Is it not about obesity, all of us | :12:46. | :12:51. | |
eating too much sugar... ? Well that is nice but I don't | :12:52. | :12:55. | |
suppose the idea of a tax for sugar echoes in terms of intake the | :12:56. | :12:58. | |
British consume far less sugar than they have done since the 1970s. The | :12:59. | :13:03. | |
intake is way down. The reason we are fat and abuses because we do not | :13:04. | :13:08. | |
exercise. We are not moving. This will simple punish poorer people, it | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
is a kind of VAT, a cost added onto your Coca-Cola. What we really | :13:14. | :13:19. | |
should be doing to people, the NHS, saying to people, get out, stop | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
driving around, sitting at your desk all day, exercise. | :13:25. | :13:29. | |
We actually agree! On a lot of things! | :13:30. | :13:37. | |
I don't know about a lot of things! We got through it. Still to come, | :13:38. | :13:39. | |
President Obama hails the deal with | :13:40. | :13:54. |