27/04/2016 The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

With me are John Kampfner, Director of Creative Industries,

and the Associate Editor of the Spectator and Vote Leave

The Independent pictures the commemorations in Liverpool

for the 96 that were unlawfully killed in the Hillsborough disaster.

It also writes that the Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn was forced

by the Shadow Cabinet to suspended Bradford MP Naz Shah

After pressure from the Shadow Cabinet.

The Metro leads with the resignation of Chief Constable David Crompton

from South Yorkshire Police over allegations he tried to play

down his force's role in the Hillsborough disaster

The Guardian says the South Yorkshire Police and crime

commissioner Alan Billings lost confidence in his Chief Constable

after speaking to family members' of the Hillsborough victims.

New Day writes of a backlash against gambling websites

following the death of a graduate who killed himself because

The Express says a cure for Alzheimer's Diease could be

America's Federal Reserve may raise US interest rates in

the coming months, say the Financial Times,

after worries about the global economy eased.

The Daily Mail headlines that hospitals are bracing for five

days of chaos following the junior doctors' strike.

Rotten to the core, aged gospel being suspended after the inquest.

He led the police's defence during the inquest, he has been suspended.

He was due to retire in six months, so this will not have a catastrophic

impact on his career. I'm not sure it will satisfy people as a

suitable, severe enough punishment. When people had been suspended from

these jobs, they still carry on receiving their salaries. In effect,

he will receive his salary, he will not have to work for it. In six

months, he will retire, which he will do anyway, and live on a fat

pension. This is concerning, the tactics that the police used in the

inquest. They are still sticking to the suggestion that some of these

fans were drunk, that they were ticketless and were rowdy and

whatever. As to be the same, if this will be the only head that rolls as

a result of all of this, it will not be enough. They have taken this

approach even though they have previously apologise or released a

notional apology in 2012, during one of the many interminable enquiries

into Hillsborough that got nowhere. They then took this pugilistic,

confrontational approach with lawyers cross questioning victims'

families as if they were criminals. Why do you think that is? Did the

believe the original lies, or were they being forceful about those lies

to give the more credence? The technical explanation, I report this

what I have read, the police said they had to do this because if the

repeated the apology chewing the inquest, it would be prejudicial.

That seems completely daft. Does that wash for you, to be questioned

it doesn't sound appropriate to me. Andy Burnham has been very

influential. Theresa May was very thorough, going through, line by

line, for the record in Parliament, the judgment as handed down

yesterday by the jury, which is incredibly moving in this past this

of the language. Andy Burnham has been emotional in the best sense of

the term, this rotten to the core is him saying in Parliament the actions

of South Yorkshire Police. It seems to be institutionally rotten as a

police force, back from 1989, and the lies that were said then, all

the way through to the actions now. Their potential criminal actions

being -- criminal prosecutions with the CPS. There is a sense of those

who stood by and saw this happen and try to placate the families, they

need to have their day in court. Let's move on to the Guardian.

Joining forces on BT you. All kinds of strange bedfellows are going on

as a result of this campaign. The Remain campaign believe that these

handshakes across the divide will help unify people. There was a

picture of them laughing together. I do not pay the -- do not think the

play well to the narrative. They think it is an assumption -- and

establishment stitch up. They brought in Obama as well. Surely it

is only Mr Bush would stitch up if you believe none of the three

London-based mainstream parties represent POTUS. -- reticent voters.

If you want to... In the terms of the Labour Party, a lot want to exit

as opposed to remain. For all three political leaders to be in favour of

remaining seems like a bit of a stitch up because so many mothers of

their -- so many members of their party want to leave.

What do you think of the opposing coalition? I prefer to think of the

exit coalition as being between Kate Hoey on the Labour side, Douglas

Carswell, who is pro-immigration, and people like Boris Johnson and

Michael Gove, John Whittingdale, it Ian Duncan Smith. It is a rebel

alliance. The Death Star being the Remain campaign. It is odd that the

former leader of the TUC should join forces with David Cameron to say

that wages should fall if we leave the EU when Sir Stuart Rose, the

notional leader of the Britain is stronger in Europe campaign, even

though they swept under the carpet since the launch of a campaign,

admitted that wages would probably fall or go up if we leave the

European Union because, with less immigration, they'll be less

downward pressure on wages. It might help our trade deficit as well. The

one bit where I disagree ... The one bit where I agree with you is if we

have got this alliance, why place it in the Guardian? It will be

interesting to do a straw poll of Guardian readers, it will be the

strongest redoubt of Stay voters as it is. Bracing for five days of A

chaos. A lot of people didn't going to hospital yesterday. There will be

problems for quite a while, one would have thought. The more I read

about the strike and the more I about the two sites, the more I

don't understand why are both so entrenched. I wish we could have

some form of conciliation service whose processes and final

conclusions are completely binding from the moment you enter into them.

It just seems to me... I know you think this might play well for

Jeremy Hunt, but the NHS has all been a potentially... Just as the

economy and immigration has all been difficult for Labour, the NHS has

been difficult for the Conservatives. To pick a fight on

the end the chess -- the NHS by design than by accident, and I think

this one is more by accident, it seems to not be clever politics. Is

this playing well for Jeremy Hunt? I don't they have picked a fight on

this deliberately. It was part of the manifesto and they don't think

the anticipated that junior doctors would make such a big deal about it.

I think we can see that public support for the junior doctors is

softening a little bit. In a poll in January, 66% of people supported the

doctors. Earlier this week, another had fallen to something like 57%.

Because of the decision to have an all-out strike, including emergency

services. And redrawing the labour from emergency rooms as well.

Stories like this on the front page of the Mail about the chaos in A

that will immediately follow, because people will have stayed away

if they possibly could during the two-day strike, and they will now go

to A in the next couple of days and that will unleash chaos and

there could be some unpleasant incidents. What was interesting that

in choosing number of hospitals is they got on better as a result of

having more consultants on, filling in, because they are making

decisions more quickly. That is part of the argument from junior doctors,

they are the only ones there at the weekend. The consultants are

available, they are on the end of the phone as opposed to being in

there in person. Decisions are made more slowly and therefore you have

an increase in a number of incidents and bass. They are still working a

seven day week. In addition, you have had this total crisis in A

over the last many months and years, with people using A as a

substitute for the GP practice. That comes around to the question of GP

practices, and a lot of them are already, but they should be more

available for longer hours. I don't know why that requires people to

work longer hours, but a lot of people in so many different walks of

life work flexible shift hours, but it does not mean longer howlers. The

problem that doctors face is that Jeremy Hunt has called their bluff.

I think they are to blink when they threatened an all-out strike like

this, he has not blink and it is not clear what they can do because if

they be shoe more industrial action, they will lose support. Under the

Independent. The Shadow cabinet forcing a U-turn as the suspend the

member. It is doubly damaging for Jeremy Corbyn, there have been an

other scandals involving anti-Semitism in various Labour

Party figures, constituency association and chairpersons and so

on. This one is the most serious of all because she re-tweeted some

particularly unpleasant remarks about transporting Israelis to

America, and that being a solution, using blank was like that, to the

conflict in the Middle East. This is the most serious so far, she was a

secretary to John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor. It is doubly bad

because Jeremy Corbyn initially wanted to just give her a wrist slap

and insist that she resign her job but remain holding onto the Labour

whip. He was busy overfull by the manners of his Shadow cabinet who

thought she should be more firmly reprimanded. This does seem to be a

problem that Labour has, a lot of those people who had views, they

would say pro-Israeli, not anti-Israel, or try to put Israel

down specifically, the Wessing P being pro-Palestinian, a lot of

those people are backing Jeremy Corbyn. That is proven to be a

problem. They would argue, as you were posing there in your critical

question, you can differentiate between the two. It gets incredibly

difficult. Jeremy Corbyn, unashamedly, has always been, as

long as he has been a left-wing rebel Labour MP, very much at the

core of the pro-Palestinian protest movement. It is an absolute

minefield now for him, as Toby has pointed out, the inappropriateness

of all of those tweets. There is more around people's past statements

and that sort of thing. You can forge a foreign policy that can say

some stern things about Israeli settlement policies, but you have to

choose a language incredibly carefully. I will have to leave it

there. Thank your for coming in to look at some of the paper. More

coming up now. Time for the weather.