07/06/2016 The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

With me are Claire Cohen, the deputy women's editor

from the Daily Telegraph, and Mihir Bose, columnist

The digital Independent leads with the EU referendum,

and accusations from David Cameron that the Leave campaign

The Financial Times headlines the government's probe

into an admission from the boss of Sports Direct that he paid

some of his staff less than the minimum wage.

That's also front page news in the Guardian,

which claims that Mike Ashley, the boss of Sports Direct,

could face a multimillion pound fine for breaking the law.

The Metro goes with the former Chelsea doctor, who's received

a payoff from the club after agreeing to drop her sexual

The Express headlines claims that British pensions are at risk

if there's a vote to stay in the European Union.

And the male leads with the migrant crisis and suggestions the EU is

planning to grant US style Green cards to those coming from Africa

and the Middle East. We will start with the Metro. Mega pay out an

apology for Chelsea. This is a huge victory for her against an

incredibly powerful organisation. Yes, very few people saying they are

surprised she has settled having turned down what was an initial

rumoured 1.2 million. I think she has had a huge victory, she got what

she wanted, she wanted her day in court and public acknowledgement

that she was just doing her job and nothing more. That is what Chelsea

have come forward and apologised unreservedly think they said in a

statement to her, that she was doing her job. Their statement is

particularly grovelling, I think, could be the word, because as you

were just saying, the point is here getting public recognition that

since she was simply behaving as a doctor assured, attending a patient?

Absolutely, and what is interesting is that Jose Mourinho has gone on to

Manchester United, he made an appearance. A surprise appearance as

the metal point out. We don't know why but they had a private buyer

closed doors meeting and we don't quite know what was said. It might

be reasonable to speculate that he made some sort of statement which

was in effect, was in -- one doesn't know what he said, but a greater

victory for her after we all know he seems we saw at the first opening

match of last season and what happened between them. If you like

this is her moment to say what happened was wrong and he therefore

has, Chelsea have apologised. Very profusely for what happened. She was

doing what she was required to do, but it also raises question about

her football clubs are run, what goes on behind the scenes because I

think what would have been useful not just for the journalist but for

the fans as well to know how the moment of explosion in a match,

which seemed very innocent and fairly routine, players injured,

Doctor Rush is on, should become such a big story. What is going on?

Lets not forget this was not just unfair dismissal, it was sectioned

stagnation as well. -- it was a sexual discrimination. However

vindicated she feels professionally, there is an undercurrent that

football is a toxic environment for women to work as as she's concerned

and that hasn't been addressed and renewal will never address that.

Let's go to the Daily Express. -- Mourinho humiliated. As you were

saying, you believe Mourinho probably, possibly, maybe, made

face-to-face apology. I think he must have done but it was before the

first tribunal hearing in March. She came out and said one of her demise

was a public apology from Mourinho. For her to have accepted a

settlement where that has not happened, there must have been

something. And for him to turn up first prize visit, they must've been

something that happened behind closed doors to make her feel like

she has had close over the issue and the public apology, it is an reserve

from Chelsea specifically not from him. Certainly not that we know

about. Tribunal 's are a very costly thing financially and emotionally,

so she would have had to wait up another ten days of this,

potentially embarrassing revelations, not just for Chelsea,

but possibly for her as well. Hindi at what might have been going on.

There is a question here that we speak about managers being the boss

of the cupboard Mourinho was not the boss, he was the boss of a football

team. She was a doctor. She was the boss of her setup. In fact there

were -- they were colleagues, so the weight surfaced on that opening

match against Swansea as if Mourinho was the boss is planning some minor

employee. The senior, elite team doctor. Yes, this has established

that she was doing her job as an employee with certain powers and

another employee cannot sort of... OK, quick question, do you think

this sets the template for how people in her position are treated

as senior doctors of a team? Clearly Jose Mourinho said there are tactics

involved and if it is right at the end and we have a player who is

injured and it could mean we end up losing the game, do not run on the

pitch. Has that kind of philosophy being thrown out of that ever really

existed? Tell you what has happened in the last 20 years, managers have

become more nosy, huge figures, there is a camera focused on them

and the Met has grown up that the manager is the club. I think what

this case being that is the manager is not the club, the manager is

responsible for the performance of the players on the field but the

club is more than that. The club has other employees, among them as

Doctor Garth session responsibilities, not just the

manager. Therefore this will question that the idea that is

because the camera shows what the manager is doing for the players are

playing, that doesn't make the manager the most important person.

OK, finally, we will have fun with this, Jay -- Daily Mail. The Daily

Mail reckons it is fine, what you think? The Metro thinks it is at

least 2 million. I'm more inclined to go with a slightly less generous.

5 million seems like an awfully big jump from 1.2. If that is more than

an insult. This is a matter of work practice. Absolutely, what we see on

the screen is 90 minute show, there is a normal workplace going on

behind-the-scenes. There is a value judgment being made by the Daily

Mail in this. One thing we know is what -- it was definitely more than

1.2 million. We can safely say that. Want the Financial Times. He

admitted today he does or did pay his staff some of them, but though

the legal minimum. And what has emerged are the practices, the work

practices, at his Sports Direct operation were the legal minimum is

6.70 but the practices involved, they've -- if you are one minute

late your dock pay 15 minutes and therefore they way you operate the

system that you are legally playing on paper a certain figure, actually

you are not. And some of what has emerged is quite scandalous. Our

woman has given birth to a child in the toilet! Six strikes and you are

out. Because she was afraid to cross the line and therefore get a bad

mark by her name and possibly lose her job somewhere down the line.

Very few permanent employees. Most of the staff seem temporary

employees who can be sacked at any moment. Yes, lots are zero hours

contracts, 80%, possibly more of the workforce. The point about Mike

Ashley is that he is not the only boss who runs the kind of operation

that relies to a large extent on casual workers. This is just the tip

of the iceberg. Maybe it's time to call for more transparency about the

temporary working culture. We have companies will be forced to that --

published there into pay gaps and that, perhaps we need similar

measures for temporary work, which seems to be growing workplace

culture in Britain. It was interesting that at one point on

Twitter Eva Carneiro and Mike Ashley were trendy at the same time --

trending. I'm not convinced Ashley quite get it either. He said I'm not

Father Christmas at one point. But he is Scrooge, surely. This is six

strikes thing for you spend too long speaking or in the loop he says,

maybe six is too few. I think he missed the point of bit. Yes. He was

making the point that this is a massive business and perhaps it has

grown so fast I can't possibly have responsibility for everything that

goes on. It is too big for me to handle. Is that something that cuts

any ice with most people? It is too big Reznor I can't possibly know

what is going on? You cannot take credit for the business when it is

doing well and making money and then say this is what I've done and then

say I don't know what is happening that up if you don't know, then you

need people below you to tell you what is happening otherwise what

you're doing is ahead of the business. Oyoo cultures got yourself

out of a job. I spend a lot of your time trying to keep Newcastle up and

even then you failed? What exactly is he doing? That at the bottom

line. It is the dreadful season at Newcastle United that has led to all

this. Ashley admits I broke the law. Staff were paid below minimum wage

says tycoon. Yes, he says the business is too big to control. He

could well be facing lawsuits as a result of his admission today.

Absolutely and some interesting detail in The Guardian story about

sexual predators in the company, as he called them. Which he admitted to

foot of yes, he said they are Republican and disgusting so that

level of sexual harassment is going on we could see lots of people being

disgruntled. -- on we could see lots of people being

disgruntled. -- repugnant. They were not debating each other, they were

talking to an audience who were taking questions. Will we see a

debate? If we see a debate it will be the blue and blue debate. This is

a cause. Which is why David Cameron doesn't want? Called by Johnson and

go, so this a spokesman for vote lead, but one of them would be a

spokesman, Michael Gove is supposed to be the Prime Minister's best

friend. An interesting debate but I'm not sure we will see that. At

this point in time it seems like the Leave campaign is in front and the

Prime Minister has to do something. Part of that when the spec is

because immigration has been so important over the last week? It

has, anything that Cameron is trying to steer the conversation away from

that and that is one reason he would be keen to avoid head-to-head, blue

on blue, as you say. I think you're right, it's clear that perhaps he

needs to do something to change the conversation or tactic as we enter

the final straight. And worth saying, you can only register to

vote until midnight tonight. Yes! 7.5 million people at 8pm still

hadn't registered. Former sports editor, you have a theory about how

this vote will go? Yes, I think we should look to Slovakia because that

is the third match England are playing. Start with Russia, then

Wales, and if England fulfil their promise, which they often don't do,

by then England should qualify and my memory of this is a 1970, student

then, on the Sunday before the thirsty election that Harold Wilson

had called England World Cup holders, better than 66, losing

Jamie George Unzue and the second half they lose throughout -- 3-2 and

the nation says that the wasp does Brussels at adding that uses the --

and we lose the election. Cameron feeling good at -- about life.

Nevertheless, vote for it. He doesn't really know Louise supports.

Something in blue. If we lose, who knows that even Boris Johnson who

doesn't play football might seem a better prospect. He makes an --

looks more like a rubber man to me full tank for joining