27/08/2016 The Papers

men who won a $300 million contract funding Pentagon to arm the allies

in Afghanistan, find out why it War Dogs heeds the target with Mark

Kermode in The Film Review. -- hits the target.

Welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us

tomorrow. The camera is going crazy. I hope you did not get dizzy then.

It is probably excited. Wouldn't you get excited if you were

a camera? The Observer quotes a former Tory

health minister calling for a new tax to fund

the NHS and social care. The Sunday Telegraph says

Theresa May is asking her ministers for their personal

Brexit blueprints. More lives could be lost

on Britain's beaches according to the Sunday Express -

which blames cuts for leaving coast And the Mail on Sunday claims

victory over plans it says are in place to divert tens

of millions of pounds in foreign aid Peter Sutcliffe's fears

over being transferred from Broadmoor Hospital

into a prison is the Sunday People's And the Sunday Mirror says

the brother of four time olympic champion Mo Farah, faces

being forced to move Shall we begin with the Sunday

Times? Pictures of Theresa May watching the cricket. Having a cup

of tea. No doubt thinking about how she would unify a cabinet in some

way to allow exit to happen. Yes, she is going to try to do that. It

is a very divided Cabinet. We are now hearing that there are all kinds

of turf wars and agitations within various departments. The ministers

charged with leading the Brexit negotiations are reportedly

displeased with the fact that the Chancellor, Philip Hammond, is now

apparently trying to muscle in on the Brexit negotiations, and he

wants to stay in the EU single market, whereas others of the Brexit

ministers might have other ideas. She has a lot of different opinions

to try to manage and tied together, and she has asked her Cabinet to

come up with good ideas, a sickly. Positive ideas -- basically. There

isn't a blueprint, and they have to come up with one. I think that will

leave a lot of people worried and nervous. It will shock a lot of

people. What the sources talking to newspapers are revealing if it is to

believed is that they are big divisions in Cabinet. The even

greater worry, rather then not having a plan, is not getting a plan

that can be enforced and agreed on. The picture on the front page of

Theresa May, is her Cabinet are sitting across from her, they will

not want to turn up to this meeting without a plan of action for her.

What I want to know is we have noticed she has a cricket brooch,

but what is the picture on the mug? It is intriguing. It looks like a

Teletubby. I can't see the writing underneath the mug, which might

help. If somebody knows, please let us know. Tweet us. I want to know

what is on Theresa May's mug. The Sunday Telegraph leads with a

similar story, Theresa May, the Brexit in force. She made a promise

that she would implement Brexit. Whatever that means. They have all

been summonsed on Wednesday. Brexit all went a bit quiet and we did not

hear much about it, and now it is back. It is back on the agenda.

There was a suggestion in today's, yesterday's Telegraph, that Theresa

May would trigger Article 50 come what may, and there is a ready a

backlash. I see what you did there. That was good. Definitely the whole

exit wing is back on the agenda. I think there is still some

uncertainty as to when and if Article 50 will be triggered, what

will it look like? -- Brexit thing. I don't think we have moved much

further on from June the 23rd when this all happened. With such deep

divisions in the Cabinet over Brexit and other things, do you think the

sources are playing the press? Winding each other up within

Whitehall? But it is not just with Cabinet ministers, there is the

suggestion that the civil service, some members, pro- European, are

trying to thwart the vote as well. You said earlier it would be

fascinating, a situation comedy, to see what is going on. Theresa May

doesn't look too worried as she watches the cricket with a cup of

tea. Let's see what the week has in store ahead. There doesn't seem to

be a timetable. We still have EU leaders discussing among themselves

when Britain should be allowed to exit the European Union. What if we

are just perpetually living and just end up discussing Brexit for years

to come? -- leaving. There are suggestions you -- Europeans are

getting frustrated. I think the key Europeans aren't, like Angela

Merkel. She is very wary of not giving the UK enough time because of

the sort of consequences that would have for the rest of Europe. The

civil service actually are the ones that are the most frustrated about

this. They seem to think we will be negotiating the terms of Brexit for

the next 20 or 30 years because it is so intricate and there is so much

to unpack. But it literally will be decades. The next general election

would be a fairly decent deadline, because it will make it complicated.

If we are still negotiating Brexit. Which party will come up weight they

would introduce exit and make it happen. That is why people have

started to suggest a timetable, a likely timetable, to trigger Article

50 by 2017, and then two years of negotiation, so by 2019, we will go

to an election on the basis of what has been great. That is why that is

starting to be presented -- has been agreed. If a party emerges saying we

will not implement Brexit, it could be... It could go on forever. Talk

us through foreign aid in the Mail on Sunday's long-standing campaign

and the ?12 billion foreign aid Manaus. -- madness. Pretty Patel,

the International Development Secretary, has decided, or she will

divert tens of millions of pounds that currently go to the foreign aid

budget into the war on terror -- Priti Patel. We don't know much more

detail in this piece, but we knew that when she was given the post,

she has not heeding the secret that she is no fan of the foreign aid

budget and how it is spent, in her eyes, somewhat recklessly. This is a

populist tactic, and I think the Mail on Sunday leaders, this will be

music to their is. For me personally, I think it is a sad

thing she has done -- music to their ears. Just to decide to take

billions out of the foreign aid budget because there is this

suggestion that the money goes to despots and is frittered away when

actually you were saying earlier it saves lives and does lots of

bullying things. She is obviously going for the populist vote and it

is making the Mail on Sunday very happy because it has been their

long-standing campaign -- lots of brilliant things. It is 0.7% of the

national GDP. There are other countries that pay more, five other

countries that pay more, mostly Scandinavian like Denmark, Norway

and Sweden. That is exactly where the money goes. 40% of it is

funnelled through the UN. A lot of it goes to African countries and

helps with things like immunisation. Obviously Syria, a big area. South

Saddam, Sierra Leone, Pakistan, where it helps schoolgirls get an

education -- South Sudan. Some of those countries have problems with

corruption, war, and we have had investigation after investigation

revealed that sometimes the money is misspent and misused and not in the

right hand. Sometimes we have problems with corruption as well. We

are not immune from that. Overall, it is safe to say that one of the

richest countries in the world having a commitment to put 0.7% of

its GDP towards international development, foreign aid, is broadly

speaking, a good thing. It is a shame to suddenly turn against that.

And foreign aid goes to refugees as well. A lot of refugees, which David

Cameron said he would increase. I don't know if that is ring-fenced,

but we may get more details as that story emerges. Shall we move on to

the Observer? Speaking of spending. And ending up getting in the right

hands. The UK needs a new tax to save NHS and social care from

collapse. This is from a top conservative politician. He doesn't

know what he is talking about in many ways and is really tapping in

to a big issue for many people. Especially when it comes to social

care. He stepped down from the Department of Health last year but

now works as an MP and part-time doctor, and he sees this every day

-- he does know. Something has to be done about social care and elderly

patients who are in hospitals, and when it is time for them to be

discharged, there is no care plan, nowhere for them to go, so they

remain in hospital, which costs more money. He is suggesting that we

should have a tax via National Insurance to raise more money to

resolve this issue. It is not new. It has been going on for a long

time. But as the population gets older, this problem is increasing.

Rachel, cuts lead to jamming. 12 die in a week -- drowning. The Sunday

Express tapping into what has been a huge story for local papers

especially in East Sussex with people saying they need to be

lifeguards and these areas councils say that is not the case and we

don't need them. It is tragic what is happening, but we don't need to

spend that kind of money. It all ties in, doesn't it? Local

authorities have had cuts imposed upon them. They have then had to

decide where the axe falls. Which exactly of these essential social

and public services are they to scrap? So to me it is no great

surprise to discover that on Britain's coastline, the coastguard

service is something that will get it, and if people are dying as a

consequence, once again, we are seeing the devastating consequences

of such terrible cuts -- hit. It does seem to be a problem across the

country, not just East Sussex. They have been 12 deaths in a week, and

near misses as well. This week has been particularly bad for crystal

depths, and it is no surprise to see an MP, forward to say this is not

good enough and we do need to put money into racecards -- coastal

deaths. There are beaches without coastguards. That is where problems

are likely to happen. We have 30 seconds to squeeze in a bit of

snoring. Do you suffer from snoring? You don't would be tight. Not that

I'm aware of. I wake everybody else other than myself. But since moving

out of the centre of the city, I am sleeping better and storing less,

and that might be because of pollution, or lack of it. Snoring is

the traffic's fault. Do you suffer from intense sleepiness during the

day? Apparently there is a gender divide. Women suffer from sleepiness

and the men to the snoring. This is rubbish. Women are sleepy during the

day because they have been kept awake by the men all night. Thank

you for taking us through the papers. The Film Review is next.