22/10/2016 The Papers

Hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be

With me are the political commentator Jo Phillips,

and the political editor of Sunday People, Nigel Nelson.

Welcome to you both again. Let's update you with what is happening on

this front pages. The Observer leads on a claim

by the British Bankers' Association that the UK's biggest banks

will relocate outside the UK next It also welcomes the arrival

of child refugees from Calais, some of them brought here under

the landmark Dubs amendment, The Times also mentions

Calais and refugee arrivals, but their main story

is an account from reporter Louise Callaghan of the Iraqi

mission to liberate the city dominates the Telegraph's front

page, but the paper focuses on claims that the Home Office

ignored warnings about the issues - such as age checks -

surrounding their arrival. to have an exclusive

on its front page - a row between Prince Charles

and Prince Andrew over the official roles of Andrew's daughters

Beatrice and Eugenie. More of that in a moment. Let's

begin with the Sunday Telegraph and a very striking photograph on the

front of the paper. If very striking photograph of quite a lot of young

men, some wearing hoods will stop one has his face covered with a

scar. According to the caption, these are hopeful migrants queueing

outside the enclosure where the dish officials are processing the claims

of unaccompanied minors -- scarf. It is not the most helpful photograph

because they certainly do not look like children. They may be under 18

but not the vulnerable children we are supposed to be helping.

Certainly that will be the opinion of a lot of people. The story the

Telegraph has here is reporting that ministers have basically ignored

offers of help mainly from local government through the Local

Government Association and local councils, because they have to look

after the kids. They offered to send social workers and support with

Ajax. So this is all being done in a rush. -- age checks. It has

backfired terribly. People do genuinely care about children. You

think of the little boy jamming on the beach in Greece. The little boy

in the back of the ambulance in Aleppo -- drowning. But people do

not expect to see young men jumping the queue because they will be

vulnerable and girls -- girls and children. Who are looking after

these young people? They will be foster parents. They have a right to

feel safe and decent, honest about it. Nigel, it is a fine line between

helping and fearing that somehow the immigration system is being

manipulated. Yes, there really is a public relations exercise that has

to go along with it. Most people are very sympathetic to the plight of

children in the jungle in Calais. So taking children over here whether

they have relatives here or are unaccompanied, that is fine provided

they are children and our honourable. What seems to have gone

wrong here, apart from the shambolic organisation leading up to the

closure of the camp, there were offers of help given back in August

-- vulnerable. Social services could have checked things like dental

records and established the age of the children. All people are asking

is that stood out. -- let's do that. We should be doing it. It should

have been better organised. The picture shows these people are just

crying desperately to get into the country. This is not organised. In

2015, nearly two thirds of child asylum seekers whose age was

disputed were found to be adults, around 900, so 600 people. They are

taking spaces that should be going to children. And there is a question

of public confidence. Yes, but at the bottom of the queue at the kids

who are left behind. Let's talk about that story on the front of the

Sunday Express referred to in the introduction. This is about the

princesses Eugenie and Beatrice and whether or not they should have an

official role. It is a great headline. It is a great headline. We

have everybody, Prince Charles, the Queen, return true -- Prince Andrew.

Broadly the story is saying that Prince Andrew once his daughters to

have a proper role, to basically join and get some royal duties and

get some taxpayer funded accommodation at Kensington Palace.

Prince Charles is against this totally, and somewhere in the middle

is the Queen, who presumably will have to say yes or no. At the

moment, my sympathy is with the princesses. I think the rural family

to need an injection of royal blood. Provided they get on with the job,

which obviously one would hope they would do, I think it would be ideal

to actually drive them in for a number of roles. -- draft. Prince

Andrew has not had a great press. Neither has their mother. I would be

happy to give them a chance and let them have a go. Do you not think

they have had a chance in the years grown-up? They have not had an

official role. They are in their early 20s. What Prince Andrew is

suggesting according to this report is give them that official role. It

would have to be taxpayer funded. If you are going to slowly reduce the

role of some of the older members of the Royal family, Princess Anne is

in her 60s and has been quite busy over the years. She will slow her

engagements down and maybe they could move up into that sort of

role. I want to know precisely what role Princess Beatrice and Eugenie

might add to anything? They could open things. They could enhance the

charity of some... Can I tell you, my local theatre in Canterbury,

which does a marvellous pantomime every year, a couple of years ago

did Cinderella, and they happen to name the ugly sisters Eugenie and

Beatrice. I am just mentioning it. That shows at least they have made a

public impact. Maybe we should be capitalising. What about

international pressure on? As ugly sisters? No. Representing Britain on

the international stage. A little bit like Prince Andrew has been

doing on the getting business for Britain? I don't think you can visit

the sins of the Buddha on the daughters. -- father. I wonder what

Eugenie and Beatrice would bring to anything given that neither of them

have shown any aptitude for doing anything other then not particularly

going to work. Let's give them a chance and some work experience and

see what happens. Let's turn to Page four, which we can't do,

unfortunately, and they will find out the rest of the story. Let's

move onto more sobering stories, and that is the fate of banks after

Brexit. One of the stories that doesn't sound terribly new or

suppressing. This is Anthony Brown, the Chief Executive of the British

Bankers' Association, warning that the Republican political debate over

Brexit is taking us in the wrong direction because the banks, which

is not a street, the big banks based in Britain, are preparing to

relocate. Some of them as soon as Christmas or by Christmas, and the

others early next year. Because there won't be able to trade

injuries once Brexit happens, once we are no longer in the EU -- US.

This mysterious passport system. So you are a bang from America or Hong

Kong, because you are in Britain, in Europe at the moment, you can carry

on doing that sort of stuff -- bank. No obstacles. Hissene Habre say this

may not work so well once we get Article 50. We may need to relocate

to Frankfurt or malign or whatever -- so the banks say. 70,000

financial jobs... One of our biggest exports, financial services. And

over one Chilean pounds. But he would say that, because he

represents the bankers! Trillion. The idea they will all rush off in

the New Year, I think that is pretty unlikely. The first thing that will

happen is we have to get the Brexit negotiations going. This will play a

major part in it. The role of the city of London in a post- Brexit

Britain will be hugely important. The banks ought to hold fire for a

little while and see what is going on. If American bankers want to go

given for the rather than buzzing London, off they go. But I think

they would rather stay here. The danger, although other European

countries are vying for their business and patron edge, the danger

of is the is that most of them would go back to America -- patronage. If

there is no benefit being here, you may as well be in New York. That one

will come back again and again until the negotiations are concluded.

Let's take about -- talk about a story that never seems to go away,

five years into the conflict in Syria. This picture on the front of

the Observer of Carey Mulligan holding a teddy bear. Your newspaper

knows about this. We have been supporting the 15 charities

organising the protest today. Carey Mulligan water daughter's teddy

bear. There are another 200 of them to represent each child that has

been killed since the ceasefire broke down last month -- brought her

daughter's. The point of the demonstration is to get some kind of

action from Theresa May and Boris Johnson. At the moment, nobody knows

what to do. That is not to underestimate the difficulties of

doing something. Boris Johnson says demonstrate outside the Russian

Embassy. Yes, he does. It is all well and good saying Theresa May and

Boris Johnson, but it is down to President Putin and President Assad.

But if we can't get them around the table, the next age is going to be

some kind of restriction over flying over Aleppo -- the next stage. If

you have aircraft can't go into a no-fly zone, the whole thing is, it

is hugely dangerous. We know the risk of a confrontation, dogfight in

their over Aleppo between us and the Russians could start world War

three. But that is a very... President Putin would have to be

totally mad to allow that to happen. With plenty of warning the --

beforehand, it could work. Let's go to the Sunday Times. We don't have

much time left. But the photo story at the top about Islamic State. Yes,

this is the report from one of the embedded reporters who is out in

Mosul. I mean, it does feel like we are just talking about war, and it

is really horrifying. What is going on in Syria, Mosul is into its sixth

or seventh day, this battle for a key time in a right. It is not so

much who wins the battle but what happens afterwards -- in Iraq. We

have had not very politically diplomatic manoeuvring is with the

government saying they don't want anything to do with Turkey. Will it

make ISIS retreat August where else? It comes back to there are ordinary

people start their -- or go somewhere else. There is no quick

resolution. There is no quick resolution. We should welcome the

fact that we are going to recapture Mosul, the Allies, and it is a start

in the right direction. Islamic State is on the run. We are

gradually pushing them back. We have taken 35% of their territory. All of

these things must be good. Probably the only way we will ever deal with

them is a military victory. But in the meantime, so-called Islamic

State have rounded up and killed and boys. They have been used as human

shields. A rather sombre note to end on, but that is how it ends. And

that is how it is on the front pages. Thank you for joining us for

the papers. My thanks for giving us such an interesting take on what

they have been saying on the front pages to mind. That is it from us.

More news at the top of the hour. Coming up next, The Film Review.