Browse content similar to Episode 3. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello and welcome to Film 2014. We're live and if you want to get in | :00:26. | :00:31. | |
touch the details are on the screen now. Coming up on tonight's show: | :00:32. | :00:36. | |
Oscar favourite Matthew McConaughey stars in Dallas Buyers Club. Mr | :00:37. | :00:44. | |
Woodroof, you are nothing more than that common drug dealer. | :00:45. | :00:46. | |
Ralph Fiennes explores Dickens' secret life in The Invisible Woman. | :00:47. | :00:53. | |
Do you love him? He is married. That has not stopped him falling in love | :00:54. | :00:56. | |
with you. And the crime-fighting man machine | :00:57. | :01:00. | |
is back in a remake of Robocop. Dead or alive? You are coming with me. | :01:01. | :01:07. | |
Plus we talk to John Ridley, the BAFTA and Oscar nominated writer of | :01:08. | :01:11. | |
12 Years A Slave. Danny is here. And we're joined by | :01:12. | :01:16. | |
guest critic Peter Bradshaw. Before we begin, we must talk about | :01:17. | :01:20. | |
Philip Seymour Hoffman, who died this weekend. Danny and Peter, this | :01:21. | :01:24. | |
is just such a massive horrible loss, isn't it? It feels so raw. It | :01:25. | :01:28. | |
is so unexpected. We are not talking about an actor that reached a grand | :01:29. | :01:33. | |
old age and if we are honest, we had started thinking about in the past | :01:34. | :01:37. | |
tense. This is a man of 46. He had two new films and who knows what he | :01:38. | :01:44. | |
had lying ahead of him. So, as it stands, it's a devastating loss for | :01:45. | :01:49. | |
any film lover. You have been watching this glorious movie, which | :01:50. | :01:53. | |
was his career and mid-scene, the film was stopped and the lights have | :01:54. | :01:57. | |
come back on and now we feel disorientated. Peter, some of his | :01:58. | :02:01. | |
favourite work - if we were going to watch one of his films, what would | :02:02. | :02:10. | |
you suggest? So difficult to say. It's not so much a star vehicle for | :02:11. | :02:14. | |
himself, it is one of his greatest films, or possibly the film which I | :02:15. | :02:21. | |
clocked him in, which was Happiness. I was afraid of him. It wasn't a | :02:22. | :02:27. | |
scary movie. It wasn't supposed to be menacing. He always gave the | :02:28. | :02:31. | |
impression that there was some deep and incredible well of anger inside | :02:32. | :02:38. | |
him which he was converting into charm and passion. He was absolutely | :02:39. | :02:45. | |
unique. The incredible thing about Happiness, he was playing a | :02:46. | :02:50. | |
character wrecked by self-loathing. Within a year, he was starring in | :02:51. | :02:59. | |
Talented Mr Ripley. He was also - Twitter was heartbroken, if that is | :03:00. | :03:05. | |
not a strange thing to say - people felt the loss so deeply. Somebody | :03:06. | :03:09. | |
has said, "Whatever happens, I would never miss a film he was in." It is | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
true. He was a huge box office draw. He always gave the impression that | :03:16. | :03:18. | |
what he did, he wanted to do. There are so many films we see where the | :03:19. | :03:24. | |
actor is taking the pay cheque, maybe the director wanted to cast | :03:25. | :03:30. | |
him or didn't. Philip Seymour Hoffman always wanted to do the film | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
and it was reconfigured around him. I can't think of anybody who is like | :03:36. | :03:44. | |
him. Perhaps Paul Schofield was comparable. He was a one-off. It | :03:45. | :03:49. | |
seems like he played a lot of characters who were frail and | :03:50. | :03:52. | |
fragile and he tapped into this side of ourselves that we don't like to | :03:53. | :03:56. | |
acknowledge is there. If you look back at his career, he didn't play | :03:57. | :04:01. | |
weak, or strong, he wasn't good guys, or bad guys, he played | :04:02. | :04:06. | |
complex. OK. Thank you. First up, Dallas Buyers Club. | :04:07. | :04:09. | |
Matthew McConaughey stars as Ron Woodroof, who smuggled anti-viral | :04:10. | :04:12. | |
drugs into the US to save his own life and the lives of other AIDS | :04:13. | :04:24. | |
patients in the 1980s. # Come on... # | :04:25. | :04:31. | |
This is the story of Ron Woodroof. He is a heterosexual man and gets | :04:32. | :04:37. | |
HIV. I had inspirations - I knew that guy. I have passed him in my | :04:38. | :04:45. | |
life. Have you ever engaged in homosexual conduct? Homo? You said | :04:46. | :04:55. | |
homo? You have 30 days to live. He lived seven more years. How did he | :04:56. | :04:59. | |
do that? He smuggled ununauthorised drugs and vitamins from overseas and | :05:00. | :05:04. | |
he was a black-market drug dealer dealing his unapproved medicines to | :05:05. | :05:09. | |
other HIV patients and people in Dallas, Texas. You treating these | :05:10. | :05:16. | |
people? I ain't selling drugs. I'm selling memberships. Welcome to the | :05:17. | :05:21. | |
Dallas Buyers Club. This is a very special film about a group of people | :05:22. | :05:25. | |
that were fighting for their lives intent on making the impossible | :05:26. | :05:30. | |
possible, a group of dreamers that were betting on themselves. Do you | :05:31. | :05:34. | |
like this dress? I think the neckline is a bit plunging. The | :05:35. | :05:39. | |
whole purpose of this study is to determine if it is helping people. | :05:40. | :05:45. | |
There ain't no helping me. I do have a lot of respect. It is a brave | :05:46. | :05:50. | |
thing to do to choose to live your life to dream it not as others would | :05:51. | :05:55. | |
have you live it. Nice restaurant, beautiful woman. That's where I feel | :05:56. | :06:05. | |
like a human again. You look great. Mr Woodroof, you are nothing more | :06:06. | :06:10. | |
than a common drug dealer. People are dying. We had half the money we | :06:11. | :06:15. | |
thought we needed ten days before shooting. We had 4.9. We thought we | :06:16. | :06:21. | |
needed 40 days, we got 25. And the director and I said, "I'll be there | :06:22. | :06:28. | |
if you will." And we did. I hadn't made a film in over six years. I | :06:29. | :06:34. | |
never expected to get this kind of response and I feel really lucky. | :06:35. | :06:39. | |
The story has been around 20 years. Couldn't get it made. We got it made | :06:40. | :06:49. | |
for 4.9 million and we were around for six Oscars. It is an | :06:50. | :06:55. | |
extraordinary film. I have pages of people saying whatever you do, go | :06:56. | :06:58. | |
and see this film for the performances. Danny? At first, all | :06:59. | :07:04. | |
anyone is going to see is this pipe cleaner figure that Matthew | :07:05. | :07:07. | |
McConaughey has transformed himself into. When an actor piles on the | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
weight or starves it off himself, you don't see the character, you see | :07:12. | :07:15. | |
the scales. That is not true here. This is a phenomenal performance | :07:16. | :07:19. | |
playing a fascinating character. Ron Woodroof is this walking | :07:20. | :07:23. | |
contradiction, a dying man who still had the life force and the vitality. | :07:24. | :07:28. | |
I think the film is pretty conventional. I think there were | :07:29. | :07:32. | |
moments when it felt like the producer had been lining up which | :07:33. | :07:38. | |
cleaning product they had to clean their Oscars with. This film demands | :07:39. | :07:42. | |
to be seen. Its heart is in the right place. It's got this electric, | :07:43. | :07:47. | |
unpredictable performance. From the first scene. I don't want to give - | :07:48. | :07:51. | |
the first scene you go, "What am I watching?" It's a barnstormer. He's | :07:52. | :07:58. | |
not acting, he's got this almost relaxed turn as an actor. He reminds | :07:59. | :08:05. | |
of a young Jeff Bridges. Yes. He is selling it to you without hammering | :08:06. | :08:13. | |
it. He is terrific. It's 120 degree-proof. It meshes well with | :08:14. | :08:17. | |
his character. Brad Pitt was going to be playing this role at one | :08:18. | :08:23. | |
stage. It works so well with Matthew McConaughey. On-screen, we know that | :08:24. | :08:27. | |
he's this free-wheeling Texas dude. Yes. Off-screen, this man was once | :08:28. | :08:33. | |
in trouble with the police for playing bongos naked in his house. | :08:34. | :08:40. | |
We've all done that! Haven't we? I think a lot of people who have seen | :08:41. | :08:45. | |
The Wolf of Wall Street will clock why he is so emaciated in those | :08:46. | :08:51. | |
early scenes. In a funny way, although they are very different | :08:52. | :08:55. | |
films, there is a weird overlap. They are American stories about | :08:56. | :09:02. | |
businessmen... It's very conservative. He is an | :09:03. | :09:06. | |
entrepreneurial self-help man who is into capitalism. The clue is in the | :09:07. | :09:10. | |
second word of the title. I suspect some veterans of the act-up campaign | :09:11. | :09:15. | |
won't be that chuffed of this straight man riding to the rescues | :09:16. | :09:21. | |
of gays. It is in favour of abstinence. The debate that was | :09:22. | :09:26. | |
current in the '80s of HIV people having sex with condoms, that is | :09:27. | :09:31. | |
absent from this movie. He believes in abstinence, except with one woman | :09:32. | :09:38. | |
who has full-blown AIDS. Absolutely. It's a very conservative movie. It's | :09:39. | :09:45. | |
socked over with such power! Can we mention Jared Leto? He hadn't been | :09:46. | :09:53. | |
in a film for six years. I thought his eregrine falcon for mans was | :09:54. | :09:58. | |
great? -- his performance was great? The only thing about let let's | :09:59. | :10:04. | |
performance is - lots of us will have seen this character before. I | :10:05. | :10:10. | |
think particularly if people remember Kiss of the Spider Woman, | :10:11. | :10:15. | |
it rings quite a lot of bells. Yes. This character is familiar in a way | :10:16. | :10:22. | |
that Ron Woodroof isn't. Yes. And the energy that Matthew McConaughey | :10:23. | :10:25. | |
brings to this film. Next, the 2014 reboot of RoboCop. | :10:26. | :10:29. | |
When a police officer is critically injured, a sinister corporation | :10:30. | :10:31. | |
seizes the opportunity to create a half-man half-machine crime fighter. | :10:32. | :10:45. | |
Give your mom a kiss. Night, baby. Too slow, boy! We are going to put a | :10:46. | :10:55. | |
man inside a machine. He suffered fourth degree burns over 80% of his | :10:56. | :10:59. | |
body. If he survives, he will be paralysed from the waist down and | :11:00. | :11:04. | |
confined to a wheelchair. You say you could save him, what does that | :11:05. | :11:08. | |
mean? What kind of life will he have? What kind of suit is this? | :11:09. | :11:18. | |
It's not a suit. It's you. It is a man being joined with a machine. | :11:19. | :11:23. | |
That is the basis of the concept. Let's go with black. It brings out | :11:24. | :11:33. | |
the question - what is the melting of machines and humans going to be | :11:34. | :11:37. | |
like in the future? This is the future of American justice. How many | :11:38. | :11:45. | |
like Thomas Kane will pay for their crimes now, now that RoboCop is | :11:46. | :11:50. | |
here? It is close to original. We have not tried to mess with what | :11:51. | :12:00. | |
works. It will make him think he is in control, but he is not. It is the | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
illusion of free will. With regards to technology and CGI and what can | :12:06. | :12:10. | |
be achieved and regards to action scenes and the worlds you can | :12:11. | :12:13. | |
create, we are living in such a different age. We didn't shy away | :12:14. | :12:19. | |
from great visuals. We didn't shy away from state of art visual | :12:20. | :12:21. | |
effects, shots of graphic design. We focussed a lot more on Murphy as | :12:22. | :12:47. | |
a family man and how him post the RoboCop re-work, the pressure that | :12:48. | :12:53. | |
it puts on the family dynamic. You need to speak to your son. This is | :12:54. | :13:05. | |
really a thinking man's action movie. Somehow, he's overwriting the | :13:06. | :13:10. | |
system's priorities. The human element will always be present. | :13:11. | :13:15. | |
Compassion, fear, instit. They will always interfere with the system. -- | :13:16. | :13:21. | |
instinct. They will always interfere with the system. Dead or alive, | :13:22. | :13:26. | |
you're coming with me. I can't come with you because I'm asleep! I have | :13:27. | :13:33. | |
fallen asleep. "I can live with toned-down violence, but if the | :13:34. | :13:37. | |
satire is absent, it will get nothing but disdain from me." I | :13:38. | :13:43. | |
haven't seen a re-boot that has so failed to get the point of the | :13:44. | :13:47. | |
original film. The original film was a black cometic gem. The idea of a | :13:48. | :13:53. | |
RoboCop clanking around with thrilling efficiency, that is not | :13:54. | :13:57. | |
just scary and exciting, it is funny. That was the point. If it is | :13:58. | :14:01. | |
not funny, it is not anything at all. This fails to get it. | :14:02. | :14:05. | |
Absolutely fails to get it. It turns it into Call of Duty. It's a shoot | :14:06. | :14:12. | |
them up first person video game with zero kind of human interest and zero | :14:13. | :14:17. | |
fun. I remember the original as being very funny. I don't know | :14:18. | :14:22. | |
whether that is my warped memory. It was incredibly funny. It was a great | :14:23. | :14:28. | |
movie. This is a 12A so they have taken all the lunatic cartoon | :14:29. | :14:31. | |
violence out. That is a great shame. The original had more than lunatic | :14:32. | :14:39. | |
cartoon violence. It was a trashy reputable B-movie. There is none of | :14:40. | :14:44. | |
that brilliance here. You get the odd glimmer. It is mostly down to | :14:45. | :14:48. | |
Gary Oldman playing this mad scientist. Yes. Setting up these | :14:49. | :14:56. | |
feeding tubes that look like they are filled with liquidised cake. | :14:57. | :15:00. | |
Weirdly, the film, more than anything, feels polite and earnest | :15:01. | :15:05. | |
and almost apologetic for itself. There is a dig at one point at the | :15:06. | :15:09. | |
Transformers movies as if to say, we are not that kind of film. You are | :15:10. | :15:15. | |
the remake of RoboCop. The rubbish at the beginning, it front-loads it | :15:16. | :15:20. | |
with this elaborate satire, the idea that the RoboCops are being deployed | :15:21. | :15:24. | |
on the streets of a subdued Tehran and they are called drones and the | :15:25. | :15:28. | |
film is so pleased with itself. This is it, this is satire. And it loses | :15:29. | :15:33. | |
interest in all of that. Absolutely loses interest and the point is to | :15:34. | :15:37. | |
get on with the boring action. And the action... The action is dull. | :15:38. | :15:42. | |
The only pretext for remaking the movie was so you had these snazzy | :15:43. | :15:47. | |
effects and they are OK, they are pretty fine for what they are. I | :15:48. | :15:52. | |
felt like they were too eager to get rid of that stuff and the satire | :15:53. | :15:59. | |
klaxon goes off. Absolutely. Marketing departments are full of | :16:00. | :16:03. | |
terrible people... The TV presenter played by Samuel L Jackson. What a | :16:04. | :16:08. | |
tired cliche. It is a strange RoboCop. It's a RoboCop that wants | :16:09. | :16:15. | |
to be the wire, it wants to convince you it has seen The Wire. You think | :16:16. | :16:25. | |
that is such a fantastic opportunity. All the subversion has | :16:26. | :16:30. | |
gone. They don't like it. I don't know whether that came across(!) | :16:31. | :16:35. | |
12 Years A Slave has been nominated for ten BAFTAS and nine Oscars. We | :16:36. | :16:44. | |
went to meet writer, John Ridley. Exterior... I don't want to survive, | :16:45. | :16:51. | |
I want to live. If you let yourself overcome with sorrow, you wi drown | :16:52. | :16:58. | |
in it. He sits and the mistress has tea poured for him. You want to | :16:59. | :17:03. | |
express yourself, that's what you want to do and I had this | :17:04. | :17:07. | |
opportunity, probably the biggest opportunity in my life that was | :17:08. | :17:12. | |
presented to me and, as I started going, I realised it is not about | :17:13. | :17:18. | |
me. You are done. Do Solomon, what did he do? What did he say? What | :17:19. | :17:22. | |
happened? Do that. That is all you have to worry about. I was born a | :17:23. | :17:27. | |
free man. I lived with my family in New York. Be good for your mother. | :17:28. | :17:36. | |
Till the day I was conceived. Sold into slavery. To understand the | :17:37. | :17:39. | |
power of what is going on, you have to care about these people. When you | :17:40. | :17:43. | |
care about people, you care about tharks and you feel their pain and | :17:44. | :17:47. | |
you don't need to dial that up. Days ago I was with my family. And my | :17:48. | :17:59. | |
home. Now you tell me all is lost. Tell no-one who I am, that's the way | :18:00. | :18:07. | |
to survive. I don't want to survive. I want to live. 12 Years A Slave, | :18:08. | :18:17. | |
two hours and 15 minutes, it's - things fall by the wayside. I wanted | :18:18. | :18:22. | |
to avoid the idea of wouldn't it be nice if the things that happened in | :18:23. | :18:30. | |
the film happened in the memoir... You are no free-man. You are a | :18:31. | :18:35. | |
Georgian runaway. There are moments of personal colour. That was | :18:36. | :18:41. | |
probably the first lesson I learnt. It is not about what I want. It's | :18:42. | :18:46. | |
not about making him into a traditional action hero. One of the | :18:47. | :18:51. | |
things I appreciate about the production team, they were not | :18:52. | :18:55. | |
interested in a conventional film. # Went down to the River... # | :18:56. | :19:02. | |
Servant, don't obey his Lord. Shall be beaten with many strikes. That's | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
scripture. The condition of your labourers, it's all wrong. It's my | :19:08. | :19:13. | |
property. You say that with pride? I say that with fact. I said come | :19:14. | :19:21. | |
here! Writers are not always treated the best and it maybe dies where you | :19:22. | :19:28. | |
don't feel as though you are treated very well. Even at its worst, | :19:29. | :19:32. | |
millions of people are going to be familiar with your work. On top of | :19:33. | :19:38. | |
that, I tried to be realistic. To be treated like garbage in Hollywood, | :19:39. | :19:43. | |
what does that mean? You get a town car instead of the limo. What does | :19:44. | :19:48. | |
that mean? You get flat water instead of sparkling water. Look, | :19:49. | :19:53. | |
all writers work hard. Everybody works hard. And within film, it is | :19:54. | :19:59. | |
such a team effort. The script can be phenomenal. Without other people, | :20:00. | :20:04. | |
it's 122-page paper weight. I have to say on this production, they | :20:05. | :20:09. | |
treated me like a partner. That's all you can ask for. I've seen the | :20:10. | :20:15. | |
film many times over and there are moments where you go, "That scene is | :20:16. | :20:19. | |
touching and tender and beautiful." And, "That one is really powerful." | :20:20. | :20:24. | |
One scene I would pick out that was not in the script when he is making | :20:25. | :20:31. | |
the corn husk dolls and that is something she came up with and that | :20:32. | :20:35. | |
was beautiful. You hope you deliver something that people can build off | :20:36. | :20:43. | |
of. This is nice. It's always been days since they announced the | :20:44. | :20:47. | |
Oscars. The one moment in your life that is supposed to be about you, | :20:48. | :20:51. | |
you realise it isn't about you. Even now, it's not. It is about Solomon. | :20:52. | :20:59. | |
I will survive. I will not fall into despair. I will keep myself hardy... | :21:00. | :21:09. | |
. Finally, Ralph Fiennes directs and | :21:10. | :21:15. | |
stars in The Invisible Woman. Every human creature is a profound secret | :21:16. | :21:26. | |
and mystery to every other. This is a completely true story. She was a | :21:27. | :21:32. | |
young actress Dickens met when he was putting on a play and he fell in | :21:33. | :21:36. | |
love. It affected the rest of his life and led to the disintegration | :21:37. | :21:42. | |
of his marriage. You are an admirer of my husband's work? Of course. It | :21:43. | :21:47. | |
is a fiction designed to entertain. Surely it is more than that. It | :21:48. | :21:52. | |
changes us. My writing is ferocious. I fight not to be distracted. Nelly | :21:53. | :21:59. | |
met Dickens when she was 18 and they were together for 13 years. So a lot | :22:00. | :22:05. | |
of the film is about this woman looking back and understanding this | :22:06. | :22:09. | |
incredible love affair that she had with Dickens. Do you love him? He is | :22:10. | :22:15. | |
married. That has not stopped him falling in love with you. He's an | :22:16. | :22:20. | |
honourable man, but he cannot marry me. No, he cannot. The position of | :22:21. | :22:26. | |
actresses at that time, the status was not so great. Unless they were | :22:27. | :22:30. | |
very successful, they were badly regarded. Nelly didn't really have | :22:31. | :22:35. | |
much of a future as an actress and that what do you do? How do you | :22:36. | :22:41. | |
survive? You have to find a husband. Action! As an actor, the main thing | :22:42. | :22:46. | |
for all of us in the cast was to play each part with integrity and | :22:47. | :22:53. | |
commit fully to those characters and playing real people does feel like | :22:54. | :22:57. | |
such a responsibility and so it was always trying to find the truth of | :22:58. | :23:02. | |
who they were and their interactions with each other. Do you like this | :23:03. | :23:11. | |
life? Life is nothing without good company. Dickens was very protective | :23:12. | :23:18. | |
of his reputation and of his private life. He wanted the world to believe | :23:19. | :23:23. | |
one thing. The thing which he did which nowadays you would not be | :23:24. | :23:32. | |
advised to do if you are under pressure with a private figure, but | :23:33. | :23:36. | |
certainly today the tabloids would have a field day with this. What is | :23:37. | :23:42. | |
it that we are? When your wife asked me if I was fond of you? I could not | :23:43. | :23:57. | |
honestly reply. I wanted to say no! An extraordinary scene. I thought a | :23:58. | :24:01. | |
beautiful film. I think you have to accept going in the film thinks the | :24:02. | :24:05. | |
most noteworthy part of Charles Dickens' long life is becoming the | :24:06. | :24:11. | |
married lover of Nel Turner. It has a fine touch. It's bold as well. It | :24:12. | :24:16. | |
sets itself this interesting problem which is how do you make a film | :24:17. | :24:23. | |
about a hugely successful man and a shy insular teenage girl without her | :24:24. | :24:27. | |
becoming overshadowed and becoming the invisible woman in her own | :24:28. | :24:32. | |
movie? It cracks that by letting her get harder and wiser over the course | :24:33. | :24:37. | |
of the film. Felicity Jones is great here. Absolutely. Peter? I liked it | :24:38. | :24:44. | |
very much. I thought it was a very passionate film. I thought it was | :24:45. | :24:47. | |
interesting because Charles Dickens is such a cliched figure and this | :24:48. | :24:54. | |
reinvents him as this extraordinary extrovert and assertive hero. It | :24:55. | :25:00. | |
brings in his career as a theatrical actor-manager and it is very clever | :25:01. | :25:03. | |
in the way it suggests the title does not simply refer to his secret | :25:04. | :25:07. | |
mistress, but to the other invisible women in his life, and Kristin Scott | :25:08. | :25:15. | |
Thomas as Nelly's mother. It is interesting to consider in The | :25:16. | :25:20. | |
English Patient, she was Ralph Fiennes's lover and now she's his | :25:21. | :25:24. | |
lover's mum. That is something to think about. I thought it was so | :25:25. | :25:28. | |
beautifully shot. There are some scenes that you want to photograph. | :25:29. | :25:32. | |
Some of them look like paintings. We also, I remember, I loved... It is a | :25:33. | :25:43. | |
different movie. Of course. It says interesting things about Victorian | :25:44. | :25:51. | |
"celebrity culture." Yes. Then you find from there, from the point of | :25:52. | :25:55. | |
Nel, how corrosive that can be when you end up as the plaything of a man | :25:56. | :25:59. | |
that powerful. I kept thinking the script didn't seem to like Dickens | :26:00. | :26:04. | |
very much. That was a bit of a problem for me. I think it is | :26:05. | :26:08. | |
incredibly well made. Behind the camera, Ralph Fiennes has a real | :26:09. | :26:12. | |
confidence. I like the fact that it didn't look like a BBC Sunday tea | :26:13. | :26:22. | |
time Dickens. It didn't - it looked like the real thing. It has a | :26:23. | :26:28. | |
documentary realism about what his personal and professional life was. | :26:29. | :26:32. | |
Part of that was down to the Production Design. That's right. | :26:33. | :26:35. | |
With this period, you worry about feeling like you are on a | :26:36. | :26:40. | |
sightseeing bus with a tour guide. You don't feel like that with this | :26:41. | :26:44. | |
film. Peter is right. There is an authenticity to it. You do feel | :26:45. | :26:49. | |
there is something genuinely Dickensian. Ralph Fiennes has gone | :26:50. | :26:53. | |
from strength to strength as a director. Yes. He really is proving | :26:54. | :26:57. | |
himself. Then, a very difficult question. What is your Film of the | :26:58. | :27:03. | |
Week? I will let Peter tell you. It is Dallas Buyers Club for sheer | :27:04. | :27:09. | |
engine power. You have to see Dallas Buyers Club with Matthew | :27:10. | :27:11. | |
McConaughey. I did like The Invisible Woman more than I was | :27:12. | :27:18. | |
expecting to. Possibly not RoboCop. I know. We were harsh! Thank you | :27:19. | :27:22. | |
very much. And The Invisible Woman will be in | :27:23. | :27:26. | |
selected cinemas on Friday and on general release from 21st February. | :27:27. | :27:29. | |
That's all from us. We'll be back next Tuesday at 11.05pm when we | :27:30. | :27:32. | |
review The Monuments Men and Cuban Fury. | :27:33. | :27:34. | |
We're going to play out tonight with Philip Seymour Hoffman in his | :27:35. | :27:39. | |
Oscar-winning role as Truman Capote. Good night. | :27:40. | :27:57. | |
I thought you had missed it. I thought I was heading to Kansas by | :27:58. | :28:06. | |
myself. I'm glad you agreed to come. You are the only one I know with a | :28:07. | :28:14. | |
qualification... Thank you. I'm nervous. Yes? Mr Truman Capote, | :28:15. | :28:23. | |
where would you like these, Sir? You can put that right there between the | :28:24. | :28:27. | |
doors. What did you bring? Just a few things. Thank you greatly, Sir. | :28:28. | :28:35. | |
You are welcome. It is an honour to have you with us, Sir. I hope you | :28:36. | :28:39. | |
won't mind me saying - I thought your last book was better than the | :28:40. | :28:45. | |
first. Thank you. Just when you think they have gotten as good as | :28:46. | :28:56. | |
they can get. Thank you very much. You're pathetic! What? You paid him | :28:57. | :29:02. | |
to say that. You paid him to say that. How did you know? Just when | :29:03. | :29:13. | |
you think they've got as good as they can get... I thought that was a | :29:14. | :29:17. | |
good line. Did you think that was too much? A little bit. LAUGHTER | :29:18. | :29:22. |