10/06/2016 The Film Review


10/06/2016

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 10/06/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

They are at the team base in Lyon, before they head to Nice to face

:00:00.:00:00.

group. We are going to have the rest of the day 's sport as well.

:00:00.:00:09.

That's coming up at 6:30pm with me, Ollie Foster, Euro 2016

:00:10.:00:12.

But now it's time for The Film Review.

:00:13.:00:23.

What Mac to The Film Review, and taking us through the week was

:00:24.:00:33.

summer releases, Mark Kermode. This is an interesting week. We have race

:00:34.:00:38.

of the serpent, which was nominated for the best foreign-language film

:00:39.:00:42.

Oscar. We have When Marnie Was There. And Michael Moore is back

:00:43.:00:55.

with Where To Invade Next? Let's start with embrace of the serpent. A

:00:56.:01:01.

mixture of fact and fiction described by the diaries of two

:01:02.:01:05.

explorers who ventured into the Amazon, decades apart. The film

:01:06.:01:10.

fictionalise as their journey but sees it from the point of view of an

:01:11.:01:16.

indigenous tribes person who has played in two stages of his life by

:01:17.:01:22.

two separate actors. The first of the explorers comes in search of a

:01:23.:01:27.

plant to you an illness which he has developed. The second of the

:01:28.:01:34.

Explorers is Evan who meets up with a guide to retrace his steps and

:01:35.:01:40.

make the same pilgrimage. This is a clip.

:01:41.:02:13.

The thing I love about this film was that it was an attempt to meld

:02:14.:02:22.

western narrative and Amazonian myth, and it does that brilliantly.

:02:23.:02:26.

You have a story of the Explorers, and another story based on this idea

:02:27.:02:32.

also less teen -- celestial beings coming down to earth on a giant

:02:33.:02:37.

Anaconda. It has these two separate time periods that flow in and out of

:02:38.:02:41.

each other, like boats floating upon the same river. It looks

:02:42.:02:46.

astonishing. You can see from the clips were watching, beautiful black

:02:47.:02:49.

and white cinematography. It has an extraordinary soundtrack mixing

:02:50.:02:55.

low-key music, some of it sounding like the old recordings of

:02:56.:02:58.

indigenous songs, blended with the strains of nature. On one hand it is

:02:59.:03:05.

a political tale about the evils of colonialism, on the other hand it is

:03:06.:03:09.

magical realist fable about so much more than that. What I love about it

:03:10.:03:13.

is that it does what cinema does at its best, to take you to another

:03:14.:03:17.

world, to see the world through different eyes. I was really bowled

:03:18.:03:21.

over by it. It is one of my favourite films of the year. I would

:03:22.:03:26.

be surprised if it is not my best of the year. It is called Embrace Of

:03:27.:03:29.

The Serpent. I would encourage anybody to track it down. What about

:03:30.:03:34.

When Marnie Was There, something quite different, and animation. This

:03:35.:03:54.

is adaptation of the 1970 -- 1967 story by JG Robinson about a young

:03:55.:03:57.

girl who goes to stay with relatives and finds friendship in a strange,

:03:58.:04:03.

mysterious house and she develops a relationship with this girl called

:04:04.:04:10.

Marnie. Is she a ghost, projection, is she a wish? You believe in her

:04:11.:04:14.

totally, because you believe in the story as told by the phone. The

:04:15.:04:18.

animation is beautiful. The drawings are wonderful. It is one of those

:04:19.:04:23.

films that manages to engage young and old alike. You genuinely feel

:04:24.:04:27.

that you could watch with a wide range of audiences. It is

:04:28.:04:33.

intelligent and sensitive, it contains universal truths, it is one

:04:34.:04:35.

thing, it is funny, there was one moment in it which seems like a

:04:36.:04:42.

playful nod towards Hitchcock. I was a huge fan of it. It is available in

:04:43.:04:50.

an English language dub. If you don't have a problem with subtitles,

:04:51.:04:58.

seek out the original version. Now we go to Michael Moore, and Where To

:04:59.:05:09.

Invade Next? . He is best known for Bowling for Columbine. This is a

:05:10.:05:13.

polemic documentary. He visits a number of countries under the guise

:05:14.:05:17.

of, because he's American, he's going to invade these countries and

:05:18.:05:25.

then steal from them some ideas, in France he sees things about healthy

:05:26.:05:33.

eating in schools, and workers' rights in Germany. Here is a clip.

:05:34.:05:41.

If your employer pays you for all of this time of? -- time off.

:05:42.:06:02.

Where To Invade Next? -- THEY SPEAK ITALIAN. Italians have one of the

:06:03.:06:18.

highest life expectancy is in the world. They live four years longer

:06:19.:06:27.

than the average American. The strange thing about this film, it

:06:28.:06:33.

has many ideas that I agree with, workers' rights, children's rights,

:06:34.:06:37.

women's rights. Philosophically I am completely in tune with the film.

:06:38.:06:42.

But there is this ongoing comedic conceit that Michael Moore is going

:06:43.:06:47.

there with this flag, he has to invade these other countries, at the

:06:48.:06:50.

beginning he says this is what I'm going to do. It is not a very good

:06:51.:06:55.

joke. He then proceeds to do it for the duration of the film. There are

:06:56.:07:02.

these interesting ways of looking at the way that societies look after

:07:03.:07:06.

their populations in a way that is perhaps superior to the way America

:07:07.:07:10.

does it, but these comic interludes do not really work. It is talking

:07:11.:07:18.

about a subject close to my heart, but in a way that feels like it is

:07:19.:07:22.

oversimplifying it, talking to an audience that doesn't know anything

:07:23.:07:27.

about this. The problem with that is, there is substance here that I

:07:28.:07:30.

agree with, interesting interviews, I just wish that it wasn't tied up

:07:31.:07:38.

in this rather aggravating conceit. And I wish that Michael Moore would

:07:39.:07:42.

take himself out of the picture. He is the thing that I like least about

:07:43.:07:46.

his documentaries. There is stuff in there, but it is the delivered in a

:07:47.:07:51.

way that I find aggravating. But if you're a fan of Michael Moore... It

:07:52.:07:55.

is more of the same and you will absolutely love it. If you are me,

:07:56.:08:00.

you will think, I could have lost all of the stuff featuring Hugh and

:08:01.:08:04.

the flag, Frank Lee. Let's talk about your best movie out at the

:08:05.:08:10.

moment. It is this adaptation of an early novella by Jane Austen, Love

:08:11.:08:20.

and Friendship. What I loved about this film was, it is really funny.

:08:21.:08:24.

Many movies claim to be, these, but for sheer laughs terminate this

:08:25.:08:30.

beats all of them hands down. It is made by somebody whose films always

:08:31.:08:35.

have a kind of Jane Austen perspective. He's always had that

:08:36.:08:42.

dry, satirical humour. Tom Bennett almost steals the show as this very

:08:43.:08:48.

sort of dim-witted character who, at the beginning is the butt of all the

:08:49.:08:52.

jokes, but manages to turn this into a great comic creation. It is called

:08:53.:08:57.

Love and Friendship. It is the funniest film in the cinema and the

:08:58.:09:01.

most politely impolite movie of the year. Another hit. We will try and

:09:02.:09:08.

think about that one. And the best DVD out at the moment, this is The

:09:09.:09:20.

Revenant. You might not want to because it is not my kind of thing.

:09:21.:09:25.

Leonardo DiCaprio plays this man who was left for dead after being

:09:26.:09:29.

attacked by a bear, then he has to go on this journey of survival, a

:09:30.:09:35.

story that has been told before in the cinema. You have to see this on

:09:36.:09:39.

the big screen to understand this cinematography, you have to see it

:09:40.:09:43.

as a completely immersive experience. On the small screen, it

:09:44.:09:55.

is still worth seeing because of Will Poulter, who is a great part of

:09:56.:10:00.

an ensemble cast. He is fabulous in it. It is an immersive experience.

:10:01.:10:07.

It is more immersive in the cinema but it is still worth seeing. It is

:10:08.:10:12.

not a film that you think it is going to be. That's a problem with

:10:13.:10:17.

the big, cinematic movie, when you watch them on a little TV at home,

:10:18.:10:24.

it is not quite the same. Actually, nowadays, many people have home

:10:25.:10:27.

viewing systems that are probably superior to the small screen.

:10:28.:10:33.

Private cinemas. The other thing is, when you watch something at home on

:10:34.:10:38.

the couch, you don't have to put up with people talking on their mobile

:10:39.:10:44.

phones and eating popcorn. For me, the cinema experience is still

:10:45.:10:47.

primary, but it is possible to have a completely satisfying home viewing

:10:48.:10:50.

experience and if you're going to watch The Revenant at home watch it

:10:51.:10:56.

with the sound turned up on the biggest possible screen and don't

:10:57.:11:00.

wander off and have a cup of tea. But go and see When Marnie Was

:11:01.:11:13.

There, love and friendship, and Embrace of the Serpent. The only one

:11:14.:11:16.

I am lukewarm about is the Michael Moore phone. A quick reminder that

:11:17.:11:22.

you will find more film news and reviews across the BBC online on the

:11:23.:11:34.

website. That is it for this week. Thank you for watching. Goodbye.

:11:35.:11:48.

Hello there, we have had a mixture of weather today. Some world in the

:11:49.:11:54.

sunshine but some heavy, thundery downpours as

:11:55.:11:55.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS