Get Out, The Salesman, Personal Shopper The Film Review


Get Out, The Salesman, Personal Shopper

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Get Out, The Salesman, Personal Shopper. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

prepare to meet last year's runners-up, Madrid. England prepare

:00:00.:00:00.

to meet Ireland in the Six Nations. That is all at 6:30pm. Now one BBC

:00:00.:00:07.

News, it is time for the Film Review.

:00:08.:00:18.

Hello and welcome to the Film Review on BBC News.

:00:19.:00:21.

To take us through this week's cinema releases is Mark Kermode.

:00:22.:00:24.

So, Mark, what do we have this week?

:00:25.:00:31.

We have Get Out, a horror movie come social thriller. We have The

:00:32.:00:44.

Salesman, a prize-winning offering. And Personal Shopper on top form. I

:00:45.:00:53.

am fascinated to know what you thought Get Out, because even

:00:54.:00:56.

watching the trailer, I felt very tense. The trailer sells it as a

:00:57.:01:00.

horror movie, and it is. The director described it as a social so

:01:01.:01:05.

essentially, it is a satire about post-racial America, in inverted

:01:06.:01:11.

commas. There is a photographer with a preppy girlfriend, and they are

:01:12.:01:17.

going to have rich parents' house for the weekend, and he says, they

:01:18.:01:21.

do know I'm black, right? And she said, why would they need to know,

:01:22.:01:25.

they are liberal? And when they arrive at the Mansion- like cows,

:01:26.:01:29.

that is pretty much the first thing he says cinema I would have a delete

:01:30.:01:37.

-- I would have voted for Obama for a third time. Here is a clip. How

:01:38.:01:41.

long has this been going on, this thing? For months. Four months? Five

:01:42.:01:54.

months, actually. She's right, I'm wrong. That's a boy, better get used

:01:55.:02:05.

to saying that! I'm so sorry. She's right, I'm wrong. Does he have an

:02:06.:02:13.

off button? D1 to unpack? At first, everything seems chummy, but there

:02:14.:02:18.

are signs that everything isn't quite right. The housemaid and

:02:19.:02:21.

groundskeeper smile in a way that seems robotic almost. The friends

:02:22.:02:26.

turn up and they are not just attentive, it's almost as if they

:02:27.:02:29.

are treating the guest as some kind of trophy. We then move into

:02:30.:02:36.

something that the writer of Stepford wives would have

:02:37.:02:39.

recognised. It manages the ship between being just about credible

:02:40.:02:42.

and going into something rather different very gradually. At its

:02:43.:02:46.

best when I think all the horror remains hidden. The way to think of

:02:47.:02:51.

it is as something that starts out as a modern version of Guess Who's

:02:52.:03:00.

Coming To Dinner and then it drifts towards Greenroom. There is humour

:03:01.:03:04.

all the way through, and there are dark laughs in it. The satire is

:03:05.:03:07.

really sort of piercing, and then when it needs to turn into something

:03:08.:03:11.

thrilling, shocking, it doesn't hold back. I thought it was a really

:03:12.:03:16.

effective piece of work. I so it with a full screening room of people

:03:17.:03:19.

who were jumping, shrieking and laughing when they were meant to.

:03:20.:03:25.

It's a really, really smart social thriller/ horror film. Overall, is

:03:26.:03:34.

it a satire about race? Weirdly, it is about the underlying racism of

:03:35.:03:37.

the Liberal elite, to some extent. It is not a film in which rednecks

:03:38.:03:42.

are the bad guys. The Liberals, who appear to be incredibly egalitarian,

:03:43.:03:45.

but there is something really sinister beneath the surface. I

:03:46.:03:50.

don't want to give anything away. As you say, the trailer is a real

:03:51.:03:53.

teaser and will get a lot of people going dizzy. They will be

:03:54.:03:56.

disappointed. Really intriguing. The Salesman won the best

:03:57.:04:08.

foreign-language Oscar. It did. It was boycotted by the director

:04:09.:04:11.

because of Donald Trump's travel ban. I think this is a very fine

:04:12.:04:16.

piece of work. Husband-and-wife, part-time actors, putting on the

:04:17.:04:25.

play, Death Of A Salesman. The real-life relationship spills onto

:04:26.:04:28.

the stage. Some people have complained the film is too

:04:29.:04:31.

schematic, that the bridge between the play and real life is too

:04:32.:04:35.

contrived. I disagree. I thought it slip from social observation into

:04:36.:04:39.

psychological thriller almost unnoticed. The performances are

:04:40.:04:43.

terrific. I think it is a really humane work and you can absolutely

:04:44.:04:46.

believe in the characters and their situations. I think it's a film that

:04:47.:04:50.

blends the personal level and the political rather beautiful Lake --

:04:51.:04:57.

rather beautifully. Having heard a few lukewarm reviews, I was very,

:04:58.:05:05.

very impressed by it. He won before for A Separation. That is in a

:05:06.:05:11.

league of its own and it's not as good as that, but that is a high

:05:12.:05:17.

water mark. It is a smart, intelligent, melancholic, insightful

:05:18.:05:20.

drama about people you can really believe in. You mentioned good

:05:21.:05:24.

performances in that. That seems to be the overriding theme of

:05:25.:05:25.

Personal Shopper. It juxtaposes the spiritual and material wealth. It is

:05:26.:05:38.

literally a search for the afterlife and a search for a nice pair of

:05:39.:05:42.

shoes. She is a personal shopper for a rich celebrity, so she spends her

:05:43.:05:46.

life going round choosing her wardrobe. However, she is also

:05:47.:05:50.

buried, having lost a brother, and she's trying to make contact with

:05:51.:05:53.

her brother because she was a medium. He was a clip. You're

:05:54.:06:00.

staying here tomorrow? I'm waiting. I told you I was waiting. What are

:06:01.:06:15.

you waiting for? We made this both. -- oath. Whoever died first would

:06:16.:06:20.

send the other a sign. A sign... From the afterlife? You could call

:06:21.:06:25.

it that, call it a million things. How do you know if it is a sign? I'm

:06:26.:06:33.

a medium. He was a medium. I'll just know it. So, it's a really

:06:34.:06:40.

intriguing setup. At the beginning, it looks like being a really creepy

:06:41.:06:44.

goat story, has her walking around the house, attempting to contact her

:06:45.:06:48.

brother. Then, she starts getting text messages, and it's almost like

:06:49.:06:52.

her phone is working as a Ouija board. She doesn't know that the

:06:53.:06:56.

text messages are coming from a brother, another spirit, a real-life

:06:57.:06:59.

stalker, or whether as the Don suggests, they are coming from

:07:00.:07:02.

herself, they are somehow subconscious. The techs are asking,

:07:03.:07:07.

what are you afraid of and ashamed of? The phone almost becomes a

:07:08.:07:11.

confident. As the film slips between the genres, as far as the

:07:12.:07:17.

supernatural stuff is concerned, it starts to be less sure-footed and

:07:18.:07:20.

drifts into territory that could be rather foolish. The reason that

:07:21.:07:24.

holds it together is because of her performance. She is in almost every

:07:25.:07:28.

shop, and it's a really sort of raw performance. She is brilliant,

:07:29.:07:33.

someone who is trying out different identities in the way she tries out

:07:34.:07:37.

different clothes. For all the flaws of the film, and there are many, she

:07:38.:07:43.

is so good that she just carries it through, and I was mesmerised by

:07:44.:07:47.

her. As I said, I have been a huge fan of hers for a while. I love the

:07:48.:07:53.

Twilight movies, but in this, she is really fine and it silences all the

:07:54.:07:55.

critics. This is a properly brilliant performance. So it is

:07:56.:08:02.

worth seeing it for her? The film is fine, adventurous, but it is flawed,

:08:03.:08:07.

but I would rather something aimed high and fell slightly short of the

:08:08.:08:10.

mark than just settled for something. This isn't something that

:08:11.:08:14.

you've seen every day. OK. We always like to talk about film of the week.

:08:15.:08:22.

You and I could still be talking about the film at won the best

:08:23.:08:25.

picture Oscar. It is great, go and see it. We should perhaps pick out

:08:26.:08:30.

something else. There is another choice, this animate called Silent

:08:31.:08:36.

Voice. It is a schoolyard drama dealing with serious subjects -

:08:37.:08:42.

bullying, isolation, loneliness, self harm, suicidal thoughts,

:08:43.:08:48.

disability, in a way that is uplifting. A beautiful score, the

:08:49.:08:51.

animation is really well done, and it is one of those films that is all

:08:52.:08:58.

about learning to look the world in the, about learning to apologise for

:08:59.:09:01.

your mistakes. It is a film with a lot of crying in it, and I don't

:09:02.:09:05.

just mean on-screen. I thought it was very touching, very impressive,

:09:06.:09:12.

and done with honesty. Good. Moonlight is still the best film!

:09:13.:09:18.

DVD of the week is, and anyone who follows me on Twitter know is that I

:09:19.:09:26.

detested Nocturnal Animals. Very stylish but hugely anti-women, and a

:09:27.:09:32.

difficult watch as a woman, and a lot of people have said that. I

:09:33.:09:36.

don't think it is, but I understand that point of view. There is an LA

:09:37.:09:41.

art dealer who receives a manuscript from her ex-husband, which is a

:09:42.:09:44.

violent story which seems to have parallels with their life together,

:09:45.:09:47.

and the way in which one reads that story within a story, the fiction

:09:48.:09:51.

within a fiction, affects the reading of the film. I know that a

:09:52.:09:55.

lot of people really don't like it, and I utterly respect that they

:09:56.:10:06.

don't. I have to say that I don't think that it is offensive in the

:10:07.:10:09.

way that some people do, but it is worth flagging up the fact that

:10:10.:10:12.

there are some people who have seen it and thought, this is just a film

:10:13.:10:15.

that is revelling in his violence. In its defence, on the violence

:10:16.:10:17.

issue, there is very little that you see. I mean, I think that one of the

:10:18.:10:20.

reasons it is powerful is because its ideas are powerful, and

:10:21.:10:25.

unpleasantly power. -- powerful. You don't, that's right, but it is

:10:26.:10:29.

unsettling. And that may account for the fact that it is only a 15 as

:10:30.:10:36.

well. It would be more unsettling if it was less well made and you could

:10:37.:10:40.

just switch off. It is a 15 because there is very little actually

:10:41.:10:45.

explain -- actually despite, but you think it is worse because it is

:10:46.:10:49.

tense. I absolutely understand your reservations, I just uncheck them.

:10:50.:10:53.

Ferry North. Thank you very much. That's the DVD for this week -

:10:54.:11:01.

Nocturnal Animals made by Tom Ford. Before we go, you will find all our

:11:02.:11:09.

film reviews on the website. And all our previous programmes are there,

:11:10.:11:13.

and on the iPlayer, of course. That is it for this week. Enjoy your

:11:14.:11:17.

cinema going. Goodbye.

:11:18.:11:20.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS