Browse content similar to Episode 6. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
CHEERING | 0:00:10 | 0:00:11 | |
Hello and welcome to Debatable, where today, | 0:00:13 | 0:00:16 | |
one player must answer a series of tricky questions to try to | 0:00:16 | 0:00:19 | |
walk away with a jackpot of over £2,000. | 0:00:19 | 0:00:22 | |
But as always, they're not on their own, they will have | 0:00:22 | 0:00:24 | |
a panel of well-known faces debating their way to the answers. | 0:00:24 | 0:00:27 | |
Will they help or will they hinder? As always, that is debatable. | 0:00:27 | 0:00:31 | |
So, let's meet them! | 0:00:31 | 0:00:32 | |
Straight-talking today, | 0:00:32 | 0:00:34 | |
we have broadcaster Rick Edwards, | 0:00:34 | 0:00:36 | |
TV presenter Rav Wilding | 0:00:36 | 0:00:37 | |
and we have retired MP and writer Ann Widdecombe. | 0:00:37 | 0:00:40 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:00:40 | 0:00:41 | |
OK, that is today's panel, let's meet today's contestant, | 0:00:45 | 0:00:49 | |
it is Loussin from London! | 0:00:49 | 0:00:50 | |
-Hello, Loussin, welcome to the show. -Thank you, nice to meet you. | 0:00:54 | 0:00:57 | |
So tell us a little bit about yourself. | 0:00:57 | 0:00:58 | |
My name's Loussin and I'm 22 years old. | 0:00:58 | 0:01:01 | |
I'm a receptionist for an engineering company. | 0:01:01 | 0:01:04 | |
I've also got a lot of interests in singing. | 0:01:04 | 0:01:07 | |
So is that something you do in work or in your spare time? | 0:01:07 | 0:01:10 | |
Well, sometimes people walk past the office, and if they catch me | 0:01:10 | 0:01:14 | |
through the door they'll see me going, | 0:01:14 | 0:01:15 | |
"Shake it off, shake it off..." | 0:01:15 | 0:01:17 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:01:17 | 0:01:18 | |
How long have you had this job, Loussin? | 0:01:18 | 0:01:21 | |
-It's actually soon to be ending. -Really(?) I wonder why! | 0:01:21 | 0:01:25 | |
I plan to finish in a few months and I'm thinking of going travelling. | 0:01:25 | 0:01:29 | |
So really, what you need is potentially | 0:01:29 | 0:01:32 | |
a quiz show where you could get yourself a couple of grand... | 0:01:32 | 0:01:35 | |
LOUSSIN LAUGHS | 0:01:35 | 0:01:36 | |
-Hey, what are the chances(?) -What are the chances? | 0:01:36 | 0:01:39 | |
-Now I CAN go to India. -How long you been singing for? | 0:01:39 | 0:01:42 | |
Maybe the age of 13. | 0:01:42 | 0:01:43 | |
And I started doing open mic nights when I went to uni, | 0:01:43 | 0:01:46 | |
and now I'm doing jazz. | 0:01:46 | 0:01:48 | |
You do know that you're on the wrong show really? These people... | 0:01:48 | 0:01:52 | |
We're not judges! | 0:01:52 | 0:01:53 | |
Hang on, give us a tune and let's see if you go through | 0:01:53 | 0:01:56 | |
to the next round. | 0:01:56 | 0:01:57 | |
I'm going to do Billionaire, cos I feel like, appropriate. | 0:01:57 | 0:02:00 | |
Not on this show, I have to say. | 0:02:00 | 0:02:02 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:02:02 | 0:02:03 | |
With the money we're dishing out here. Go ahead. | 0:02:03 | 0:02:07 | |
# I want to be a billionaire so frickin' bad... # | 0:02:07 | 0:02:10 | |
Hey, hey, hey, hey... | 0:02:10 | 0:02:12 | |
# Buy all of the things I never had... # | 0:02:12 | 0:02:16 | |
-OK, let's go to our panel, Ann, is it a yes from you? -I'm tone-deaf. | 0:02:16 | 0:02:20 | |
-So that's a no from you then? -I wouldn't know. -OK. | 0:02:20 | 0:02:24 | |
-Let's go to Simon. -You made that song your own. | 0:02:24 | 0:02:28 | |
LOUSSIN SIGHS CONTENTEDLY | 0:02:28 | 0:02:30 | |
-And finally, Louis. -Ohh... | 0:02:30 | 0:02:33 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:02:33 | 0:02:34 | |
What is it? "I didn't like it - I loved it." That sort of thing? | 0:02:36 | 0:02:39 | |
-LOUSSIN: -Yeah! -APPLAUSE | 0:02:39 | 0:02:41 | |
-Ready to play? -I'm ready, I was born ready. -Born ready, here we go. | 0:02:41 | 0:02:44 | |
It's time for Round One. | 0:02:44 | 0:02:46 | |
Round One is multiple choice, four possible answers, | 0:02:49 | 0:02:52 | |
only one is correct, three questions in this round. | 0:02:52 | 0:02:55 | |
£200 up for grabs for each correct answer, a possible 600 quid. | 0:02:55 | 0:02:59 | |
Here's your first question. | 0:02:59 | 0:03:00 | |
I've a feeling it's Winston Churchill, | 0:03:17 | 0:03:19 | |
but I'm going to need Ann to help me out here. | 0:03:19 | 0:03:21 | |
OK. Panel, your debate starts now. | 0:03:22 | 0:03:25 | |
It's got to be Winston Churchill, I would have thought. | 0:03:25 | 0:03:27 | |
-Because he was a prolific writer. -OK. | 0:03:27 | 0:03:30 | |
I don't know that he ever got a Nobel Prize, | 0:03:30 | 0:03:32 | |
so I would have thought that was the most likely out of that. | 0:03:32 | 0:03:35 | |
Are there any we can eliminate, nice and easily? Castro? | 0:03:35 | 0:03:39 | |
I would be tempted to eliminate Castro. | 0:03:39 | 0:03:41 | |
I don't know, I feel like it is possible to be | 0:03:41 | 0:03:43 | |
a communist and also like literature. | 0:03:43 | 0:03:45 | |
-Yes, but did he? -I don't know. | 0:03:45 | 0:03:48 | |
It wasn't JFK, was it? | 0:03:48 | 0:03:50 | |
And I can't remember that Charles de Gaulle ever wrote anything of... | 0:03:50 | 0:03:54 | |
that level of significance. | 0:03:54 | 0:03:56 | |
Yeah, Charles de Gaulle, | 0:03:56 | 0:03:57 | |
I've certainly never read any of his books. | 0:03:57 | 0:04:00 | |
-RIPPLE OF LAUGHTER -How many of them are there? | 0:04:00 | 0:04:02 | |
Four. | 0:04:02 | 0:04:04 | |
-LAUGHTER -Really? Can you name them? | 0:04:04 | 0:04:06 | |
They're all in French, so... Over to you, Rav! | 0:04:06 | 0:04:10 | |
-I think the most likely is Winston. -Yeah, I think Churchill. -Yeah? | 0:04:11 | 0:04:15 | |
We are going to go for the first answer, which is Winston Churchill. | 0:04:15 | 0:04:19 | |
So they think, like you, Winston Churchill. | 0:04:20 | 0:04:23 | |
-I'm going to go with the panel, with myself, Winston Churchill. -OK. | 0:04:23 | 0:04:28 | |
Let's see, to get you up and running, for £200... | 0:04:28 | 0:04:31 | |
Did Winston Churchill win a Nobel Prize for Literature? | 0:04:31 | 0:04:34 | |
He did! | 0:04:40 | 0:04:42 | |
PANELLISTS DROWNED OUT BY APPLAUSE | 0:04:42 | 0:04:45 | |
It's all good. Churchill won the prize in 1953. | 0:04:46 | 0:04:50 | |
His works include an autobiography | 0:04:50 | 0:04:52 | |
and a multi-volume work about the First and the Second World Wars. | 0:04:52 | 0:04:56 | |
-Charles de Gaulle did write war memoirs, no novels. -Four? | 0:04:56 | 0:05:02 | |
-He wrote nine volumes. -But the latter five were not really... | 0:05:02 | 0:05:07 | |
-He went off the boil, didn't he? -They were very overrated. | 0:05:07 | 0:05:11 | |
OK, Loussin, you're off to a flying start, | 0:05:11 | 0:05:13 | |
that's £200 into the prize pot. | 0:05:13 | 0:05:15 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:05:15 | 0:05:17 | |
OK, Loussin, here comes your next question. | 0:05:18 | 0:05:21 | |
I work in an engineering office, so... | 0:05:41 | 0:05:44 | |
-This should be a piece of cake! -Yeah. | 0:05:44 | 0:05:46 | |
-A piece of cake, or a vegetable. -Yes! -They're kind of... | 0:05:46 | 0:05:49 | |
It's all, like, reminiscent of Arabic structures, actually, | 0:05:51 | 0:05:55 | |
and that shape is sort of like an onion, | 0:05:55 | 0:06:00 | |
so I think I'm going to have a ponder on the onion dome. | 0:06:00 | 0:06:03 | |
OK, have a ponder on the onion. | 0:06:03 | 0:06:05 | |
Panel, can you bring anything to this? Your debate starts now. | 0:06:05 | 0:06:08 | |
I would have tossed up between onion and garlic, | 0:06:08 | 0:06:10 | |
and the reason I'd choose garlic, which might sound a bit odd, | 0:06:10 | 0:06:13 | |
is if you think of the shape of a clove of garlic, | 0:06:13 | 0:06:17 | |
it is a bit like that. | 0:06:17 | 0:06:18 | |
I don't think it's radish or turnip, | 0:06:18 | 0:06:20 | |
but I'm open to be convinced otherwise. | 0:06:20 | 0:06:23 | |
I'm inclined to agree with you, I think... | 0:06:23 | 0:06:25 | |
And Russia likes onions quite a lot. | 0:06:25 | 0:06:27 | |
That's what I was going to say, | 0:06:27 | 0:06:28 | |
what is the most obviously linked to Russia? | 0:06:28 | 0:06:31 | |
-You think of borscht. -Those domes are kind of ribbed, | 0:06:31 | 0:06:34 | |
aren't they? Am I remembering that? | 0:06:34 | 0:06:36 | |
So they're that shape and they've got kind of got...segments? | 0:06:36 | 0:06:40 | |
-Which is a bit more garlicky... -Yeah. | 0:06:40 | 0:06:42 | |
-..than onion. -Onion's much more regular round, isn't it? | 0:06:42 | 0:06:46 | |
I love that about it being in segments. | 0:06:46 | 0:06:48 | |
I'd be happy to go with garlic for that reason, if everyone is happy. | 0:06:48 | 0:06:51 | |
-I'd be very happy to go with garlic. -OK. | 0:06:51 | 0:06:53 | |
Our answer is garlic dome. | 0:06:53 | 0:06:55 | |
I like the idea of going with garlic, | 0:06:58 | 0:07:00 | |
but Ann said that they love onions. | 0:07:00 | 0:07:02 | |
I'm going to go with the panel, because of the segments. | 0:07:02 | 0:07:05 | |
I'm going to go with the garlic dome. | 0:07:05 | 0:07:08 | |
-No, I'm going to go with onion. -LAUGHTER | 0:07:08 | 0:07:10 | |
You're going with onion, Loussin. | 0:07:10 | 0:07:12 | |
I'm going with garlic. | 0:07:13 | 0:07:15 | |
I'm going with garlic. | 0:07:16 | 0:07:19 | |
You believe Saint Basil's Cathedral in Moscow has a garlic dome. | 0:07:19 | 0:07:22 | |
For £200, the correct answer is... | 0:07:23 | 0:07:25 | |
AUDIENCE GASPS | 0:07:32 | 0:07:34 | |
-Oh, Loussin. RICK: -Oh, sorry. | 0:07:34 | 0:07:36 | |
You should have trusted your gut. | 0:07:36 | 0:07:38 | |
I should have trusted my gut, every time, I always think this! | 0:07:38 | 0:07:42 | |
So-called because they are shaped like an onion, there you go. | 0:07:42 | 0:07:46 | |
They've missed a trick there, should have called it garlic. | 0:07:46 | 0:07:48 | |
Does look garlicky, doesn't it? | 0:07:48 | 0:07:50 | |
The one on the left-hand side looks like a Mr Whippy ice cream. | 0:07:50 | 0:07:53 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:07:53 | 0:07:55 | |
Nothing for that one, Loussin. | 0:07:55 | 0:07:56 | |
One more question still to come in this round, here it comes. | 0:07:56 | 0:07:59 | |
I've a feeling it's Manchester, I feel like Manchester | 0:08:13 | 0:08:16 | |
had a lot of factories. | 0:08:16 | 0:08:17 | |
Hold that thought, you're edging towards Manchester. | 0:08:17 | 0:08:20 | |
Panel, can you help us out here? Your debate starts now. | 0:08:20 | 0:08:23 | |
The north-west was a huge producer of cotton, | 0:08:23 | 0:08:26 | |
and when I was fighting Burnley in 1979... | 0:08:26 | 0:08:31 | |
Was that the seat of Burnley, or you were fighting the city of Burnley? | 0:08:31 | 0:08:34 | |
No, I wasn't fighting the city. | 0:08:34 | 0:08:36 | |
The demise of cotton was a very, very big issue, and Manchester, | 0:08:36 | 0:08:40 | |
of course, is virtually next door. | 0:08:40 | 0:08:41 | |
So I think that's just got to be Manchester, I can't believe | 0:08:41 | 0:08:45 | |
that Southampton ever specialised in cotton. | 0:08:45 | 0:08:47 | |
Southampton's a port, I don't think it's anything to do with cotton. | 0:08:47 | 0:08:50 | |
-Derby... In football, it's Rams... -It's got to be the north-west. | 0:08:50 | 0:08:53 | |
I don't know if they're known for that. | 0:08:53 | 0:08:55 | |
You cannot make cotton from rams. You can't. | 0:08:55 | 0:08:57 | |
And God knows I've tried! | 0:08:57 | 0:08:59 | |
You know, very often we're uncertain on this panel, | 0:08:59 | 0:09:02 | |
but if it ISN'T Manchester, I shall be utterly amazed. Utterly amazed. | 0:09:02 | 0:09:06 | |
Yeah, I'm with you on that. | 0:09:06 | 0:09:07 | |
I am too. Our answer is Manchester. | 0:09:07 | 0:09:10 | |
OK, panel pretty sure on this one, Loussin. | 0:09:12 | 0:09:15 | |
They are, I trust Ann's knowledge about cotton, politics, | 0:09:15 | 0:09:18 | |
and it's got to be Manchester. | 0:09:18 | 0:09:19 | |
OK, you're going with your gut, you're going with the panel. | 0:09:19 | 0:09:22 | |
For £200, the correct answer is... | 0:09:22 | 0:09:25 | |
It is Manchester! | 0:09:32 | 0:09:34 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:09:34 | 0:09:35 | |
Very well done. Well done, Ann. Well played, panel. | 0:09:35 | 0:09:38 | |
Manchester was famous as the centre of textile and cotton, | 0:09:38 | 0:09:42 | |
which was one of Britain's largest exports during the 19th century. | 0:09:42 | 0:09:46 | |
So, very well done, Loussin. At the end of Round One, you're on £400. | 0:09:46 | 0:09:50 | |
Yay! | 0:09:50 | 0:09:52 | |
Let's see how they cope with pictures, it's time for Round Two. | 0:09:54 | 0:09:57 | |
OK, Loussin, Round Two is our picture round, | 0:09:59 | 0:10:01 | |
we need you to put three pictures in the correct order. | 0:10:01 | 0:10:04 | |
£300 for each correct answer, a possible £600 up for grabs. | 0:10:04 | 0:10:08 | |
So, here comes your first one. | 0:10:08 | 0:10:09 | |
OK, I know the dodo is definitely going to be either first or second. | 0:10:26 | 0:10:30 | |
Great auk? I've never heard of that, but it looks... | 0:10:30 | 0:10:34 | |
I think I'm going to go with the great auk first, | 0:10:34 | 0:10:36 | |
cos it's got a really short neck, | 0:10:36 | 0:10:38 | |
and I feel like evolution has gotten rid of birds with short necks | 0:10:38 | 0:10:42 | |
and little wings. | 0:10:42 | 0:10:44 | |
-LAUGHING: -It's got really little wings. | 0:10:44 | 0:10:46 | |
Listen, I-I think we should maybe stop there. | 0:10:46 | 0:10:49 | |
Yeah? | 0:10:49 | 0:10:50 | |
I want to hear more about how birds have evolved... | 0:10:53 | 0:10:57 | |
Easy now. OK, panel, any help on this? Your debate starts now. | 0:10:57 | 0:11:04 | |
-OK, Ann. -Can I be very unscientific? -Yes. | 0:11:04 | 0:11:07 | |
-When I was a child, I was very fond of Enid Blyton. -Yep. | 0:11:07 | 0:11:10 | |
And one of her characters was a very keen ornithologist | 0:11:10 | 0:11:14 | |
-who claimed to have seen a great auk. -Oh. | 0:11:14 | 0:11:18 | |
Now, if a great auk had been extinct for centuries, | 0:11:18 | 0:11:21 | |
it wouldn't have been much of a story, so I suggest therefore | 0:11:21 | 0:11:26 | |
that the great auk was a fairly recently extinct bird. | 0:11:26 | 0:11:28 | |
Ooh, I like that. | 0:11:28 | 0:11:29 | |
But that is totally unscientific, that is just on Enid Blyton. | 0:11:29 | 0:11:32 | |
OK, well, that's certainly a good starting point. | 0:11:32 | 0:11:34 | |
Which I was reading in the '50s. | 0:11:34 | 0:11:36 | |
-Weirdly... -Yeah? -..I think I'm just going to nail this. | 0:11:36 | 0:11:38 | |
-OK. -Oh, good. -So the dodo went extinct in the 17th century... | 0:11:38 | 0:11:41 | |
I'm almost certain. | 0:11:43 | 0:11:45 | |
Passenger pigeon was in the 20th century, | 0:11:46 | 0:11:50 | |
and I think the great auk was 19th. | 0:11:50 | 0:11:53 | |
I'm 100% with you on the dodo, | 0:11:53 | 0:11:55 | |
because these are from Mauritius, | 0:11:55 | 0:11:57 | |
where my dad's from. | 0:11:57 | 0:11:58 | |
Well, let's put the dodo... | 0:11:58 | 0:11:59 | |
And they were killed in 1600 and something when | 0:11:59 | 0:12:01 | |
-the Portuguese came over and ate them. -Yep, yep. | 0:12:01 | 0:12:03 | |
So you're absolutely right with that one. | 0:12:03 | 0:12:05 | |
-The pigeon, did you think was...? -It was after World War I, wasn't it? | 0:12:05 | 0:12:11 | |
And the great auk is essentially a massive penguin. What a legend. | 0:12:11 | 0:12:15 | |
So we have our answers. | 0:12:15 | 0:12:18 | |
We are going to go dodo, great auk and passenger pigeon. | 0:12:18 | 0:12:23 | |
Eh, so, Rick taking charge on this, what do you think? | 0:12:25 | 0:12:28 | |
I'm going to just throw away my reasoning and go with the panel. | 0:12:28 | 0:12:32 | |
-You're going with the panel. -I'm going with the panel. | 0:12:32 | 0:12:35 | |
OK, for £300, is that the correct order? | 0:12:35 | 0:12:38 | |
It IS the correct order! | 0:12:44 | 0:12:46 | |
Well done, panel. | 0:12:50 | 0:12:51 | |
The dodo became extinct in the 17th century, Rav, exactly right. | 0:12:51 | 0:12:55 | |
The great auk was a flightless bird of | 0:12:55 | 0:12:57 | |
the northern seas that was hunted to extinction | 0:12:57 | 0:13:00 | |
-in the mid-19th century. -Well done. | 0:13:00 | 0:13:02 | |
It is alleged the last known pair of birds of the species | 0:13:02 | 0:13:06 | |
were killed in 1844. | 0:13:06 | 0:13:08 | |
The passenger pigeon was extinct by 1914, when the last bird, | 0:13:08 | 0:13:13 | |
called Martha, died at Cincinnati Zoo. | 0:13:13 | 0:13:16 | |
Aww, poor Martha. | 0:13:16 | 0:13:18 | |
Well done, panel. Well done, Loussin. | 0:13:18 | 0:13:20 | |
That's £300 into your prize pot, you're up to £700. | 0:13:20 | 0:13:23 | |
CHEERING AND APPLAUSE | 0:13:23 | 0:13:24 | |
Here comes your second picture question. | 0:13:26 | 0:13:28 | |
Oh, do I know my Eurovision? | 0:13:42 | 0:13:45 | |
I'm going to say Dana International, Katrina and the Waves | 0:13:45 | 0:13:50 | |
and then Lordi. That might change. | 0:13:50 | 0:13:52 | |
OK, that might change. | 0:13:52 | 0:13:54 | |
OK, panel, let's plumb your Eurovision knowledge. | 0:13:54 | 0:13:57 | |
Your debate starts now. | 0:13:57 | 0:13:59 | |
My European knowledge is limited entirely to Dana, | 0:13:59 | 0:14:02 | |
but that happened while I was a student, | 0:14:02 | 0:14:04 | |
so we're talking late '60s, early seventies. | 0:14:04 | 0:14:07 | |
OK. I was hoping Bucks Fizz would come up, | 0:14:07 | 0:14:09 | |
cos that's probably the last one I remember! | 0:14:09 | 0:14:12 | |
And they are none of these options. | 0:14:12 | 0:14:13 | |
Katrina and the Waves though, I do think was probably la... | 0:14:13 | 0:14:17 | |
Possibly late '90s, early 2000s, I'm thinking. | 0:14:17 | 0:14:20 | |
I've got '97 or something like that in my head. | 0:14:20 | 0:14:24 | |
-Lordi... -And Lordi was quite recent. | 0:14:24 | 0:14:26 | |
She was certainly while I was a student, we're going back... | 0:14:26 | 0:14:29 | |
I think we might be thinking of someone else, Ann. | 0:14:29 | 0:14:32 | |
Oh, she's not the Dana who did All Kinds of Everything? | 0:14:32 | 0:14:35 | |
-I don't think this Dana... -In that case, I know nothing about it. | 0:14:35 | 0:14:38 | |
..is the person you're thinking about as a student. | 0:14:38 | 0:14:40 | |
-Then I know nothing about her. -I think it was sort of 2000s then. | 0:14:40 | 0:14:44 | |
-UNCERTAIN: -Yeah. | 0:14:44 | 0:14:45 | |
But then, looking at the picture of Katrina and the Waves, | 0:14:45 | 0:14:48 | |
I think you're right to go on more the late '90s side. | 0:14:48 | 0:14:51 | |
-So she would be earliest, so... -So I would do that. | 0:14:51 | 0:14:54 | |
Katrina, Dana and Lordi's the most recent. | 0:14:54 | 0:14:57 | |
-Yeah. -We happy? Ann, you happy? | 0:14:57 | 0:14:59 | |
-Oh, I don't have a view. -OK. | 0:14:59 | 0:15:01 | |
-And you're convinced there really are two Danas. -I believe so. | 0:15:01 | 0:15:05 | |
OK, our answers are Katrina and the Waves, | 0:15:05 | 0:15:07 | |
Dana International and then Lordi. | 0:15:07 | 0:15:09 | |
I'm going to say Katrina and the Waves is the earliest. | 0:15:11 | 0:15:13 | |
I've changed my mind. I'm tempted to change Dana and Lordi. | 0:15:13 | 0:15:17 | |
I don't know why. I'm going to change Dana and Lordi. | 0:15:17 | 0:15:20 | |
You're going to change Dana and Lordi. Going against the panel. | 0:15:21 | 0:15:24 | |
You believe Katrina and the Waves first won Eurovision then | 0:15:24 | 0:15:27 | |
Lordi then Dana International. For £300, is that the correct order? | 0:15:27 | 0:15:32 | |
Wrong order, Loussin. Let's have a look at the right order. | 0:15:41 | 0:15:46 | |
The panel had this one correct. | 0:15:46 | 0:15:48 | |
Katrina and the Waves, then Dana International, then Lordi. | 0:15:48 | 0:15:53 | |
Katrina and the Waves, the last UK win, back in 1997, | 0:15:53 | 0:15:58 | |
with Love Shine A Light. | 0:15:58 | 0:15:59 | |
Transsexual singer Dana International won in 1998 | 0:15:59 | 0:16:04 | |
in Birmingham, representing Israel, with Diva. | 0:16:04 | 0:16:07 | |
I can't believe I got that so wrong. | 0:16:07 | 0:16:09 | |
-You can't believe you got that one so wrong. -I only knew one Dana. | 0:16:09 | 0:16:12 | |
Lordi, representing Finland, won in 2006 with Hard Rock Hallelujah. | 0:16:12 | 0:16:18 | |
So, you went against the panel there, Loussin. It didn't work out. | 0:16:18 | 0:16:21 | |
However, at the end of Round Two, you're up to £700. | 0:16:21 | 0:16:25 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:16:25 | 0:16:26 | |
How do you think the panel's doing now, Loussin? | 0:16:29 | 0:16:31 | |
I think they're doing pretty well. I think I'm going to trust them more. | 0:16:31 | 0:16:35 | |
-You're going to trust them a bit more? -Yeah! | 0:16:35 | 0:16:37 | |
Especially when it comes to things like Eurovision. | 0:16:37 | 0:16:39 | |
So, anybody standing out, then, | 0:16:39 | 0:16:40 | |
anybody you're thinking you might take to the final debate? | 0:16:40 | 0:16:43 | |
-See, I was keen on Ann. -Not for the modern stuff! | 0:16:43 | 0:16:46 | |
OK, Loussin, there's still £1,000 up for grabs. | 0:16:47 | 0:16:50 | |
It's time for Round Three. | 0:16:50 | 0:16:51 | |
OK, in this round, you will face questions that contain three | 0:16:54 | 0:16:58 | |
statements about a person, a place or a thing. | 0:16:58 | 0:17:00 | |
Only one of them is true. Two questions in this round. | 0:17:00 | 0:17:03 | |
Because it's our final round, | 0:17:03 | 0:17:04 | |
the money goes up to £500 for each correct answer. | 0:17:04 | 0:17:07 | |
So, Loussin, have a look at this and tell me what you think. | 0:17:07 | 0:17:10 | |
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy definitely won awards. Hugh Laurie... | 0:17:31 | 0:17:34 | |
Oh, I did watch The Night Manager, | 0:17:34 | 0:17:37 | |
but I stopped after the first or second episode! | 0:17:37 | 0:17:40 | |
I'm going to say that Hugh Laurie's character in The Night Manager | 0:17:40 | 0:17:44 | |
might be female in the book. | 0:17:44 | 0:17:46 | |
OK. Not sure on this one. Not sure. Can we sort it out, panel? | 0:17:46 | 0:17:50 | |
Your debate starts now. | 0:17:50 | 0:17:51 | |
-Have you read any of these books? -Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. | 0:17:52 | 0:17:55 | |
-Seen the film? -So long ago. But it was huge, and it did win. | 0:17:55 | 0:17:59 | |
-It won awards. -Any Oscars, though? That is a lot, isn't it? | 0:17:59 | 0:18:04 | |
-That really is a lot to win. -I think Gary Oldman is an incredible actor. | 0:18:04 | 0:18:09 | |
I'm not sure he's won an Oscar. And apologies, Gary, | 0:18:09 | 0:18:12 | |
if you're watching and you have won three Oscars. | 0:18:12 | 0:18:15 | |
-He's a huge fan of this show. -Yeah, yeah, I bet he is. | 0:18:15 | 0:18:18 | |
He's cursing the TV at the moment! | 0:18:18 | 0:18:21 | |
Lupita Nyong'o worked as a runner on the film The Constant Gardener. | 0:18:21 | 0:18:25 | |
Now, she's an actress that was in... Is it 12 Years A Slave? | 0:18:25 | 0:18:29 | |
-I believe that was her. -Yeah. -It is plausible. | 0:18:29 | 0:18:32 | |
I'm not sure if she was living here at the time, though. | 0:18:32 | 0:18:35 | |
I also think she might be too young. | 0:18:35 | 0:18:37 | |
The Constant Gardener is early 2000s, isn't it? | 0:18:37 | 0:18:40 | |
Isn't it, like, 2002? | 0:18:40 | 0:18:42 | |
See, that is very much earlier than 12 Years A Slave. | 0:18:42 | 0:18:45 | |
Yeah, I think at least ten years, | 0:18:45 | 0:18:48 | |
-and I think Lupita Nyong'o is probably in her mid-20s. -Yeah. | 0:18:48 | 0:18:53 | |
I've not watched The Night Manager and certainly haven't read the book. | 0:18:53 | 0:18:57 | |
I've watched The Night Manager, but that's | 0:18:57 | 0:18:59 | |
-no use if you haven't read the book. -No. | 0:18:59 | 0:19:02 | |
Was Hugh Laurie's character in the programme called Jenny | 0:19:02 | 0:19:06 | |
-or something like that? -LAUGHTER | 0:19:06 | 0:19:08 | |
OK. I think we're in agreement on the bottom one, and Lupita Nyong'o, | 0:19:08 | 0:19:12 | |
I think she would have been too young, | 0:19:12 | 0:19:15 | |
which leaves us with Hugh Laurie's character possibly being | 0:19:15 | 0:19:18 | |
a female, and we are going to say Hugh Laurie's character was | 0:19:18 | 0:19:22 | |
a female in the book. | 0:19:22 | 0:19:23 | |
OK, so our panel not quite sure on this, | 0:19:26 | 0:19:28 | |
but by a process of elimination they are going for A. | 0:19:28 | 0:19:31 | |
They believe Hugh Laurie's character in The Night Manager was | 0:19:31 | 0:19:33 | |
originally female in the bok. | 0:19:33 | 0:19:35 | |
I just feel like surely feminists would have been in uproar | 0:19:35 | 0:19:38 | |
about Hugh Laurie's character being female changed to male. | 0:19:38 | 0:19:41 | |
But then, the main female character was quite strong. Erm... | 0:19:41 | 0:19:46 | |
I'm going to go with statement A, only because I feel like the | 0:19:46 | 0:19:49 | |
panel know more about the other two actors than I do. | 0:19:49 | 0:19:52 | |
OK, you're going for A. You're agreeing with the panel. | 0:19:52 | 0:19:56 | |
You think Hugh Laurie's character in The Night Manager | 0:19:56 | 0:19:58 | |
is female in the book. | 0:19:58 | 0:20:00 | |
For £500, the correct statement is... | 0:20:00 | 0:20:04 | |
..Lupita Nyong'o worked as a runner on the film The Constant Gardener. | 0:20:13 | 0:20:19 | |
It was great logic you were working out. | 0:20:19 | 0:20:21 | |
You thought that if Hugh Laurie's character had've been changed, | 0:20:21 | 0:20:24 | |
I mean, there would have been a bit more of a hoo-hah about it. | 0:20:24 | 0:20:27 | |
The character Richard Roper, played by Hugh Laurie, is male in both the | 0:20:27 | 0:20:31 | |
novel and the television adaptation, | 0:20:31 | 0:20:33 | |
although Olivia Coleman's character, Angela Burr, was a man in the book. | 0:20:33 | 0:20:38 | |
Oldman was nominated for his first Oscar for his performance in | 0:20:39 | 0:20:42 | |
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, and you're right, | 0:20:42 | 0:20:44 | |
he hasn't won an Oscar to date. | 0:20:44 | 0:20:46 | |
The Constant Gardener was shot in 2005, when Lupita Nyong'o was 22. | 0:20:46 | 0:20:51 | |
-Oh! -So just in case any union people think that underage runners would | 0:20:51 | 0:20:57 | |
have been employed on that movie. | 0:20:57 | 0:20:59 | |
I'm afraid no money there, but there's still £500 up for | 0:20:59 | 0:21:02 | |
grabs in your final question in this round. Here it comes. | 0:21:02 | 0:21:06 | |
I've never heard that he was suspected of stealing the Mona Lisa. | 0:21:21 | 0:21:23 | |
The panel can correct me. I feel like it could be C. | 0:21:23 | 0:21:26 | |
OK, you feel like it could be C. Panel, any help on this? | 0:21:26 | 0:21:30 | |
Your debate starts now. | 0:21:30 | 0:21:31 | |
I veer towards C, as well, towards the fact that he was over 30. | 0:21:31 | 0:21:36 | |
It's the time of his first exhibition, | 0:21:36 | 0:21:37 | |
not the first painting he ever did or sold or anything. | 0:21:37 | 0:21:41 | |
His first exhibition. | 0:21:41 | 0:21:42 | |
I don't know about the other two, but I can't believe we | 0:21:42 | 0:21:44 | |
wouldn't all know if he was suspected of stealing the Mona Lisa. | 0:21:44 | 0:21:47 | |
The Mona Lisa's pretty big potatoes to be suspected of stealing. | 0:21:47 | 0:21:50 | |
I think we'd know, because it must have been a huge thing at the time. | 0:21:50 | 0:21:53 | |
We'd know, surely. | 0:21:53 | 0:21:54 | |
And we'll all know, because it would be in the mythology around him. | 0:21:54 | 0:21:57 | |
I think so, and someone would have made a film about it. | 0:21:57 | 0:22:00 | |
I've seen a lot of his... At the risk of bragging, I've seen quite | 0:22:00 | 0:22:04 | |
a bit of his early work, guys! | 0:22:04 | 0:22:05 | |
-Good. Use your knowledge. Do you know when Cezanne was painting? -No. | 0:22:07 | 0:22:12 | |
We could work it out if we knew more about Cezanne, | 0:22:12 | 0:22:14 | |
and then we could work out if he was likely to have been a mentor. | 0:22:14 | 0:22:16 | |
If anything, I'd say it was probably the other way round. | 0:22:16 | 0:22:19 | |
-I think Cezanne would have... -I had a feeling. -Yeah. | 0:22:19 | 0:22:22 | |
So, yes, I think the first exhibition. | 0:22:22 | 0:22:25 | |
Yeah, OK, we're going to say Pablo Picasso was over 30 years old | 0:22:25 | 0:22:29 | |
at the time of his first exhibition. | 0:22:29 | 0:22:31 | |
OK, Loussin, they think he was over 30. | 0:22:32 | 0:22:35 | |
I know that he mentored a lot of young artists. | 0:22:35 | 0:22:38 | |
It's going to really annoy me, | 0:22:38 | 0:22:40 | |
because it's actually one that I'm quite good at. | 0:22:40 | 0:22:42 | |
But I'm not good at onion architecture. | 0:22:43 | 0:22:45 | |
I'm going to... I'm going to go with C. | 0:22:47 | 0:22:50 | |
OK, you're going with C. For £500, the correct answer is... | 0:22:50 | 0:22:56 | |
-..he was suspected of stealing the Mona Lisa! -Who would have thought? | 0:23:03 | 0:23:08 | |
-Who would have thought? -None of us! | 0:23:08 | 0:23:11 | |
When the Mona Lisa was stolen from the Louvre in 1911, | 0:23:11 | 0:23:14 | |
Picasso was one of several suspects. No evidence could be found. | 0:23:14 | 0:23:18 | |
Two years later, the true culprit was discovered, | 0:23:18 | 0:23:21 | |
an Italian petty criminal called Vincenzo Peruggia. | 0:23:21 | 0:23:24 | |
He actually believed that the work belonged to Italy, | 0:23:24 | 0:23:27 | |
but it was actually commissioned by a French king, | 0:23:27 | 0:23:29 | |
even though it was painted by Leonardo. | 0:23:29 | 0:23:32 | |
Pablo Picasso was born 42 years after Cezanne. | 0:23:32 | 0:23:34 | |
Picasso said of him that he was "my one and only master". | 0:23:34 | 0:23:38 | |
Picasso was a precocious artist and had an exhibition of his | 0:23:38 | 0:23:42 | |
early works in Paris when he was 19. | 0:23:42 | 0:23:44 | |
-You were right about Cezanne. -Yeah... | 0:23:44 | 0:23:46 | |
The panel couldn't get there, | 0:23:46 | 0:23:48 | |
I'm afraid you couldn't work it out either, Loussin. | 0:23:48 | 0:23:50 | |
It means at the end of Round Three, you're on £700. | 0:23:50 | 0:23:53 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:23:53 | 0:23:54 | |
So, £700, a tidy little sum. Any plans for the cash? | 0:23:56 | 0:24:00 | |
I can definitely put it towards my trip to India and the yoga | 0:24:00 | 0:24:04 | |
-retreat that I'm going to do. -OK. | 0:24:04 | 0:24:07 | |
There is only one question between you and that money. | 0:24:07 | 0:24:09 | |
It is of course today's final debate. | 0:24:09 | 0:24:11 | |
In the final debate, it's one question, six possible answers. | 0:24:11 | 0:24:15 | |
We need three of those answers to be correct. | 0:24:15 | 0:24:18 | |
OK, Loussin, who would you like to join you in the final debate? | 0:24:18 | 0:24:22 | |
Will your chances be as dead as a dodo with Rick, will you go with | 0:24:22 | 0:24:25 | |
the Crimewatch host that didn't know Picasso was a suspect, Rav, | 0:24:25 | 0:24:29 | |
or will you unpeel the intellectual onion that is Ann? | 0:24:29 | 0:24:34 | |
I'm not an onion! | 0:24:34 | 0:24:36 | |
I mean, there are so many layers of knowledge there. But... | 0:24:37 | 0:24:41 | |
-LOUSSIN LAUGHS -..I'm going to go with Rick, | 0:24:41 | 0:24:43 | |
because I feel like we've also got the same pattern of reasoning. | 0:24:43 | 0:24:46 | |
Not sure that's a good thing, by the way! | 0:24:46 | 0:24:48 | |
OK, Rick, can you please join us for the final debate? | 0:24:48 | 0:24:51 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:24:51 | 0:24:53 | |
OK, Rick, Loussin has chosen you for the final debate because she | 0:24:56 | 0:25:00 | |
-believes that you guys think alike. -We have a certain synergy. | 0:25:00 | 0:25:03 | |
We've not done especially well with it, but we do have it. | 0:25:03 | 0:25:07 | |
It is the final debate, Loussin, so we do give you two to choose from. | 0:25:07 | 0:25:10 | |
Have a look at these categories and tell me what you guys fancy. | 0:25:10 | 0:25:14 | |
I'm going to say I read a lot of books when I was a child. | 0:25:19 | 0:25:21 | |
International football is just something I know nothing about. | 0:25:21 | 0:25:25 | |
Rick, how do you feel about this? | 0:25:25 | 0:25:27 | |
I mean, listen, if it was me I'd probably go with football, | 0:25:27 | 0:25:32 | |
-but how hard can it be, right? -Yeah! Jacqueline Wilson... -Who? | 0:25:32 | 0:25:36 | |
-OK, let's go. -Yeah, OK, let's do it. Children's literature. | 0:25:36 | 0:25:40 | |
OK, here we go, you're going for children's literature. | 0:25:40 | 0:25:43 | |
We're going to put 45 seconds on the clock. | 0:25:43 | 0:25:45 | |
For £700, Loussin. We wish you all the best. | 0:25:45 | 0:25:48 | |
Here's your final debate question. | 0:25:48 | 0:25:50 | |
Your final debate starts now. | 0:26:08 | 0:26:11 | |
-OK, obviously it's a shame that Ann isn't up here. -Yeah! | 0:26:11 | 0:26:15 | |
-But the ones that I know are Anne and Julian. -Anne and Julian. | 0:26:15 | 0:26:20 | |
And then it's... I mean, I just... | 0:26:20 | 0:26:25 | |
I'm guessing that... Did they have a dog called Timmy? | 0:26:25 | 0:26:29 | |
Something like that. | 0:26:29 | 0:26:30 | |
-Would it be part of the Famous Five? -That's a good point, actually. | 0:26:30 | 0:26:33 | |
They are unlikely to have the dog as part of the gang, aren't they? | 0:26:33 | 0:26:36 | |
So Anne, Julian... | 0:26:36 | 0:26:38 | |
-And I don't think there was a Sally. -I think it's Anne, Julian and Peter. | 0:26:38 | 0:26:42 | |
-Yeah? -Yeah. | 0:26:42 | 0:26:44 | |
-Yeah. -Ten seconds. -So, well, Anne and Julian I'm almost certain on. | 0:26:45 | 0:26:50 | |
-Scamper doesn't feel like a person. -Scamper's not a person. | 0:26:51 | 0:26:54 | |
Scamper's a dog. | 0:26:54 | 0:26:55 | |
I need three answers. | 0:26:56 | 0:26:58 | |
I'm going to give you Anne, Julian and Peter. | 0:26:58 | 0:27:01 | |
OK, Loussin, here we go. You know how it works. | 0:27:01 | 0:27:03 | |
We need all three of these answers to be correct | 0:27:03 | 0:27:05 | |
to leave with the money. The first answer you gave me was Anne. | 0:27:05 | 0:27:10 | |
Was Anne part of the Famous Five? | 0:27:10 | 0:27:12 | |
APPLAUSE She was! | 0:27:17 | 0:27:20 | |
You're up and running. The next name you gave me was Julian. | 0:27:20 | 0:27:24 | |
If Julian was one of the Famous Five, you're still in the game. | 0:27:24 | 0:27:28 | |
For £700, was Julian in the Famous Five? | 0:27:28 | 0:27:32 | |
APPLAUSE He was! | 0:27:39 | 0:27:41 | |
And so it all comes down to this. | 0:27:44 | 0:27:46 | |
If Peter's correct, you leave with £700. | 0:27:46 | 0:27:50 | |
If it's wrong, I'm afraid you do leave with nothing. | 0:27:50 | 0:27:53 | |
Was Peter a part of the Famous Five? | 0:27:53 | 0:27:56 | |
He wasn't, Loussin. I am so, so sorry. | 0:28:05 | 0:28:09 | |
Let's have a look at the correct answer. | 0:28:09 | 0:28:13 | |
Julian, Dick and Anne, George and Timmy the dog, as the song went. | 0:28:13 | 0:28:17 | |
-Timmy was the dog! -Timmy was the dog. -Oh, no! | 0:28:17 | 0:28:21 | |
I am so, so sorry. Give it up one more time for Loussin! | 0:28:21 | 0:28:24 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:28:24 | 0:28:26 | |
-You were so close! -I know! | 0:28:26 | 0:28:30 | |
That is it for Debatable. | 0:28:30 | 0:28:32 | |
There's just time for me to thank our fantastic panel, | 0:28:32 | 0:28:34 | |
to Rick Edwards, to Rav Wilding and Ann Widdecombe. | 0:28:34 | 0:28:36 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:28:36 | 0:28:38 | |
I hope you've enjoyed watching. We'll see you next time for more | 0:28:38 | 0:28:41 | |
heated debates. For now, it's goodbye. | 0:28:41 | 0:28:43 |