Browse content similar to Episode 6. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
This programme contains some strong language. | 0:00:02 | 0:00:05 | |
Tickel's dead! | 0:00:05 | 0:00:06 | |
-I need to have the e-mail. -I'll do it. | 0:00:06 | 0:00:10 | |
Are you for the chop, Mrs Murray? | 0:00:10 | 0:00:11 | |
Ha-ha(!) Very funny! | 0:00:11 | 0:00:12 | |
Quiet Batpeople on every fucking paper! | 0:00:12 | 0:00:16 | |
What are you doing at my computer?! | 0:00:16 | 0:00:18 | |
I'm bringing down Mannion by leaking an e-mail. | 0:00:18 | 0:00:20 | |
Mr Tickel's medical records were illegally acquired. | 0:00:20 | 0:00:24 | |
I have decided to stand down as leader. | 0:00:24 | 0:00:26 | |
The Guardian have received an e-mail from Fergus | 0:00:26 | 0:00:28 | |
with all of our comments about Mr Tickel underneath. | 0:00:28 | 0:00:31 | |
You were supposed to redact it, send the top e-mail, | 0:00:31 | 0:00:33 | |
not the whole fucking exchange! | 0:00:33 | 0:00:35 | |
If a government can't leak, do you know what happens? | 0:00:35 | 0:00:37 | |
Dark shit builds up. | 0:00:37 | 0:00:39 | |
-What the fuck is going on? -There's going to be an inquiry. | 0:00:39 | 0:00:42 | |
And then it bursts! | 0:00:42 | 0:00:45 | |
This is an inquiry into the death of Mr Douglas Tickel, | 0:00:45 | 0:00:49 | |
and the practice and culture of the dissemination of confidential information | 0:00:49 | 0:00:54 | |
between political parties and the public media. | 0:00:54 | 0:00:57 | |
Mr Weir. | 0:00:57 | 0:00:59 | |
Thank you, Lord Goolding. | 0:00:59 | 0:01:01 | |
Our first witness today is, er, is Mr Stewart Pearson. | 0:01:01 | 0:01:04 | |
No, it's... It's fine. | 0:01:04 | 0:01:05 | |
Er, yeah, um, I, Stewart Pearson, do sincerely declare and affirm | 0:01:06 | 0:01:10 | |
that the evidence I shall give will be the truth, the whole truth, | 0:01:10 | 0:01:13 | |
and, and nothing but, er, the truth. | 0:01:13 | 0:01:16 | |
On page 235 of your witness statement, | 0:01:17 | 0:01:22 | |
you describe yourself as the, the human router in government. | 0:01:22 | 0:01:27 | |
Can you, er, can you explain what you meant by that? | 0:01:27 | 0:01:29 | |
Um, I'm a-a router | 0:01:29 | 0:01:33 | |
in the sense that I control the governmental, informational | 0:01:33 | 0:01:37 | |
ingestion and egestion process. | 0:01:37 | 0:01:39 | |
Mr Pearson just to clarify - | 0:01:39 | 0:01:41 | |
your job is to make sure that the public perception | 0:01:41 | 0:01:45 | |
of your government's programme is a positive one. Is that fair? | 0:01:45 | 0:01:48 | |
It's not about perception. Yeah? | 0:01:48 | 0:01:50 | |
I believe in government as a transceiver, hm? | 0:01:50 | 0:01:53 | |
Transceiver. | 0:01:53 | 0:01:54 | |
Yeah, it's really important, sure, to give out a strong signal, | 0:01:54 | 0:01:59 | |
but to be effective, you've got to listen for an echo. | 0:01:59 | 0:02:01 | |
Could you possibly speak in plain English? | 0:02:01 | 0:02:04 | |
I'm sorry, I-I thought I was. | 0:02:04 | 0:02:06 | |
So what IS clear is that you are an important man, Mr Pearson. | 0:02:06 | 0:02:11 | |
I'm just a lad from Leeds with a lust for life, yeah? | 0:02:11 | 0:02:15 | |
There's an African proverb that's stuck with me, yeah? | 0:02:15 | 0:02:19 | |
"If you think you're too small to make a difference, | 0:02:19 | 0:02:22 | |
"you've never spent a night with a mosquito." | 0:02:22 | 0:02:24 | |
So...part of your job... | 0:02:24 | 0:02:27 | |
is to make sure that the government's message gets across clearly? | 0:02:27 | 0:02:32 | |
Is that right? | 0:02:32 | 0:02:35 | |
That's correct. | 0:02:35 | 0:02:36 | |
And despite the sarcasm marinating that question, I'm very successful in that endeavour. | 0:02:36 | 0:02:40 | |
No, there was no sarcasm intended at all, Mr Pearson. | 0:02:40 | 0:02:44 | |
Sorry, I must have misread your...face. | 0:02:44 | 0:02:48 | |
Does your job intrude on your home life? | 0:02:48 | 0:02:51 | |
No. | 0:02:51 | 0:02:52 | |
No, when I close the front door, I... | 0:02:52 | 0:02:55 | |
I'm no longer Stewart Pearson. | 0:02:55 | 0:02:56 | |
When you, when you... | 0:02:56 | 0:02:58 | |
I mean, when I...when I close it from the...from the inside. | 0:02:58 | 0:03:01 | |
You know, when I close it from the outside then I... | 0:03:01 | 0:03:04 | |
then I very much AM Stewart Pearson. | 0:03:04 | 0:03:06 | |
So who are you at home? | 0:03:06 | 0:03:09 | |
Er, I'm a husband, | 0:03:09 | 0:03:11 | |
I'm a...pardon me, a lover, | 0:03:11 | 0:03:14 | |
I'm a carpenter, I'm a cook, I'm a flautist. | 0:03:14 | 0:03:17 | |
-A-a..? -A flautist. | 0:03:17 | 0:03:19 | |
-Right. -I play the flute. | 0:03:19 | 0:03:22 | |
And I dabble on the Irish bodhran. | 0:03:22 | 0:03:24 | |
Erm, and would you like to express any remorse for Mr Tickel's death? | 0:03:26 | 0:03:30 | |
What would you like to say to his family? | 0:03:30 | 0:03:32 | |
Er, I would like to offer them maximum respect, you know? | 0:03:32 | 0:03:36 | |
And maximum remorse. | 0:03:36 | 0:03:38 | |
And maximum assurance that Mr Tickel did not die in vain. | 0:03:38 | 0:03:42 | |
We're here. You know? | 0:03:42 | 0:03:43 | |
How can we make the government and the media inclusive without being intrusive? Yeah... | 0:03:43 | 0:03:48 | |
And if we can answer that, | 0:03:48 | 0:03:50 | |
at least we can make sure there are no more Mr Tickels. | 0:03:50 | 0:03:53 | |
I mean that...I mean that not in the sense of, you know, | 0:03:53 | 0:03:56 | |
wiping out the Tickel family name. | 0:03:56 | 0:03:58 | |
I mean it in the sense that nothing like this will ever happen again. | 0:03:58 | 0:04:02 | |
-Hello, Mr Pearson. -Hi. | 0:04:02 | 0:04:04 | |
Tab 28 in your bundle there, page 263... | 0:04:04 | 0:04:08 | |
..a paper that you presented in 2006, The Iconography of Consensus. | 0:04:10 | 0:04:14 | |
Would you care to summarise the argument you present there? | 0:04:14 | 0:04:17 | |
-Sure, yeah, the main thrust... -Bearing in mind Lord Goolding's desire for plainness and clarity. | 0:04:17 | 0:04:23 | |
Right. OK. | 0:04:23 | 0:04:25 | |
Er, I hypothesise that... | 0:04:25 | 0:04:27 | |
Sorry. | 0:04:29 | 0:04:30 | |
I say... | 0:04:30 | 0:04:32 | |
..that the design structure for a parliamentary democracy | 0:04:33 | 0:04:36 | |
should be that of the Pompidou Centre. | 0:04:36 | 0:04:38 | |
Morally and structurally explicit and open, | 0:04:38 | 0:04:42 | |
a porous membrane. | 0:04:42 | 0:04:44 | |
Maybe just a little bit plainer, Mr Pearson. | 0:04:44 | 0:04:47 | |
People... | 0:04:50 | 0:04:51 | |
should know, er... | 0:04:51 | 0:04:53 | |
..what politicians are doing. | 0:04:54 | 0:04:56 | |
Brilliant. | 0:04:56 | 0:04:57 | |
Thanks. | 0:04:57 | 0:04:59 | |
Government should be porous? | 0:04:59 | 0:05:02 | |
-Yes. -But not leaking? | 0:05:02 | 0:05:03 | |
Come on. If someone is determined to leak information, | 0:05:03 | 0:05:07 | |
there's nothing that anyone can do about that. | 0:05:07 | 0:05:09 | |
So as Director of Communications, | 0:05:09 | 0:05:12 | |
you are unable to prevent sensitive material | 0:05:12 | 0:05:15 | |
being communicated to journalists? | 0:05:15 | 0:05:17 | |
If someone chokes on a packet of crisps, do you issue an arrest warrant for Gary Lineker? | 0:05:17 | 0:05:22 | |
Is it fair to say that you have in fact changed nothing, | 0:05:22 | 0:05:24 | |
and government communications carries on exactly as they did before, by leaks and whispers? | 0:05:24 | 0:05:29 | |
No, it is not fair to say that. | 0:05:29 | 0:05:31 | |
In fact, as you disapprove and condemn these practices, | 0:05:31 | 0:05:34 | |
are they not more covert and more hidden and more secret than ever before? | 0:05:34 | 0:05:37 | |
I think that is also an unreasonable assertion. | 0:05:37 | 0:05:40 | |
In spite of your desire to create a political Pompidou Centre, | 0:05:40 | 0:05:43 | |
haven't you created the opposite, Centrepoint? | 0:05:43 | 0:05:46 | |
Everybody sees it looming over them, but nobody has any idea what happens inside. | 0:05:46 | 0:05:50 | |
I think there's some kind of club on the top floor. | 0:05:50 | 0:05:53 | |
So, Mr Pearson, have you identified the source of the leak... | 0:05:53 | 0:05:58 | |
-No. -..of Mr Tickel's records? | 0:05:58 | 0:06:00 | |
-No. -Have you ever leaked yourself? | 0:06:00 | 0:06:03 | |
No. | 0:06:03 | 0:06:05 | |
No, I was, I was over that pre-Britpop. | 0:06:05 | 0:06:08 | |
Do you have any idea where the leak might have come from? | 0:06:08 | 0:06:11 | |
Well, you know, if this was CSI Miami, | 0:06:11 | 0:06:14 | |
I guess we'd be looking for the person who had the most to gain from the leak being made public. | 0:06:14 | 0:06:18 | |
Well, er, despite your shirt, this ISN'T CSI Miami. | 0:06:18 | 0:06:22 | |
Who do you think would benefit most from the leak? | 0:06:23 | 0:06:26 | |
Well, I guess I'd be sending David Caruso knocking on the door of Mr Malcolm Tucker. | 0:06:26 | 0:06:31 | |
Can I ask you, how would you describe yourself? | 0:06:32 | 0:06:35 | |
Er, I'm a media strategist. | 0:06:35 | 0:06:38 | |
So you would be Stewart Pearson's opposite number? | 0:06:38 | 0:06:41 | |
Er, well, I'd be Stewart Pearson's opposite | 0:06:41 | 0:06:44 | |
in every possible way, I think. | 0:06:44 | 0:06:46 | |
-TITTERING -You have a lot of control and power over your party, don't you? | 0:06:46 | 0:06:50 | |
Ah-ha! | 0:06:50 | 0:06:52 | |
I wish, yes! Um, no. | 0:06:52 | 0:06:54 | |
I think that that's been overstated. | 0:06:54 | 0:06:57 | |
So this reputation you have as an enforcer, | 0:06:57 | 0:06:59 | |
that's completely misrepresenting you, is it? | 0:06:59 | 0:07:02 | |
It's baloney. Politicians who have to do things that they don't want to do, | 0:07:02 | 0:07:05 | |
such as resign... | 0:07:05 | 0:07:07 | |
er, because they've been caught with their fingers in the till, or, you know, | 0:07:07 | 0:07:11 | |
with their knickers up a flagpole or whatever, they... | 0:07:11 | 0:07:13 | |
sometimes it's very convenient for them to have a bogeyman. | 0:07:13 | 0:07:16 | |
"Malcolm made me do it." Well, I didn't make them do it. | 0:07:16 | 0:07:20 | |
These are people who just find themselves stuck in a room with one exit, | 0:07:20 | 0:07:24 | |
and I simply show them the door. | 0:07:24 | 0:07:26 | |
I've highlighted some quotes. | 0:07:26 | 0:07:28 | |
The Guardian. | 0:07:28 | 0:07:30 | |
"Malcolm Tucker has the physical demeanour and the political instincts | 0:07:30 | 0:07:34 | |
"of a velociraptor." | 0:07:34 | 0:07:35 | |
Yes, The Guardian, the newspaper that hates newspapers. | 0:07:35 | 0:07:38 | |
-Telegraph... -The Telegr-arse. | 0:07:38 | 0:07:40 | |
"Tucker's writ runs through the lifeblood of Westminster | 0:07:41 | 0:07:44 | |
"like raw alcohol, at once cleansing and corroding." | 0:07:44 | 0:07:49 | |
The Times. | 0:07:49 | 0:07:50 | |
"If you make eye contact with Malcolm Tucker, | 0:07:50 | 0:07:52 | |
"you have spilled his pint." | 0:07:52 | 0:07:54 | |
The Spectator. "Iago with a BlackBerry." | 0:07:54 | 0:07:57 | |
I mean, you're saying these quotes are, what, misguided? | 0:07:57 | 0:08:00 | |
The Spectator...! Um... | 0:08:00 | 0:08:02 | |
No, I'm saying you're taking these out of context, you're not contextualising these. | 0:08:02 | 0:08:06 | |
If you were to put them into a perspective, if you were to place them into the landscape, | 0:08:06 | 0:08:10 | |
you would see that there might be a lot of axes being ground here. | 0:08:10 | 0:08:14 | |
I don't see the difference between what you have just done and a leak, by the way. | 0:08:14 | 0:08:18 | |
The difference is that what I've just read out was not obtained illegally. | 0:08:18 | 0:08:21 | |
How do you know that? | 0:08:21 | 0:08:22 | |
You don't know what confidences have been breached | 0:08:22 | 0:08:25 | |
in order to form these opinions, for that is what they are. | 0:08:25 | 0:08:28 | |
So, you accept leaking as part and parcel of the political media machinery? | 0:08:30 | 0:08:34 | |
Yes, I mean if you didn't have leaking, | 0:08:34 | 0:08:36 | |
the newspapers would just be full of long-lense bikini shots, | 0:08:36 | 0:08:40 | |
and adverts for sheds, and offers to buy three pairs of trousers for a tenner, etcetera. | 0:08:40 | 0:08:44 | |
It's just... It's the way it is. Big deal, no-one dies. | 0:08:44 | 0:08:48 | |
One person did die, Mr Tucker. | 0:08:48 | 0:08:51 | |
-Would you tell us how it works? -You know, you do me a favour, I do you a favour. Yeah? | 0:08:53 | 0:08:58 | |
And what might you expect in return? | 0:08:58 | 0:09:00 | |
-Anything. -What? | 0:09:00 | 0:09:01 | |
Well, a Kit-Kat, you might get. | 0:09:01 | 0:09:03 | |
I've had a Kit-Kat, I've had, er, a-a big meal. | 0:09:03 | 0:09:07 | |
Could you give us an example? | 0:09:07 | 0:09:09 | |
Um... Well, yes. | 0:09:09 | 0:09:12 | |
I... | 0:09:13 | 0:09:14 | |
This is The Daily Mirror, | 0:09:14 | 0:09:15 | |
and I could get drummed out of the Magic Circle for showing you this. | 0:09:15 | 0:09:19 | |
Anyway, this is The Daily Mirror... | 0:09:19 | 0:09:22 | |
about the Quiet Batpeople, er, policy of Mrs Nicola Murray. | 0:09:22 | 0:09:26 | |
I was there that day. You can't see me cos I've been cropped out here, | 0:09:26 | 0:09:30 | |
but this information here, I made sure that those notes were in that place, | 0:09:30 | 0:09:34 | |
that they were available, and that the picture editor knew where to find them. | 0:09:34 | 0:09:38 | |
Sorry, I'm just trying to... trying to get this clear. | 0:09:38 | 0:09:42 | |
Was Mrs Murray not the subject of huge derision as a result of this? | 0:09:42 | 0:09:46 | |
Er, no she was a subject of huge derision before this. | 0:09:46 | 0:09:49 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:09:49 | 0:09:51 | |
But it was... | 0:09:51 | 0:09:52 | |
You were, you were trying to undermine the leader of your party? | 0:09:52 | 0:09:56 | |
I was... | 0:09:56 | 0:09:57 | |
Would you say you were a loyal man, Mr Tucker? | 0:09:57 | 0:10:00 | |
I'm loyal, yes. I'm loyal to my party | 0:10:00 | 0:10:03 | |
and I feel that Mrs Murray's policies were turning the party into... | 0:10:03 | 0:10:07 | |
I don't know if you've seen those calendars with pictures of dogs that are dressed up in... | 0:10:07 | 0:10:12 | |
They've got little dresses and hats on? | 0:10:12 | 0:10:14 | |
She was turning my party into that, she was humiliating my party, | 0:10:14 | 0:10:18 | |
so I thought it was absolutely vital | 0:10:18 | 0:10:21 | |
to focus the public's attention onto that. | 0:10:21 | 0:10:24 | |
And yet you maintain that you had great, I don't know, what, respect for Mrs Murray as a person. | 0:10:24 | 0:10:28 | |
Yeah. Yes. She was a great laugh occasionally. Great dancer. | 0:10:28 | 0:10:32 | |
She's got terrific...hair. LAUGHTER | 0:10:32 | 0:10:35 | |
She did a good job at DoSAC. | 0:10:35 | 0:10:37 | |
A much better job than her successor, who, let's not forget, | 0:10:37 | 0:10:41 | |
was playing on a slide when the news of Mr Tickel's death came out. | 0:10:41 | 0:10:45 | |
Thank you, Mr Tucker, we're well versed in the events surrounding the death of Mr Tickel. | 0:10:45 | 0:10:50 | |
So tell me, | 0:10:50 | 0:10:51 | |
the PFI e-mail that led to the...to the resignation of Nicola Murray. | 0:10:51 | 0:10:57 | |
Did you... Did you engineer that? | 0:10:57 | 0:11:00 | |
-Mr Tucker? -No. No. | 0:11:03 | 0:11:05 | |
No, I didn't. | 0:11:06 | 0:11:08 | |
And, er, the leaking of Mr Tickel's health records? | 0:11:08 | 0:11:11 | |
I mean, do I detect your hand in that, for instance? | 0:11:11 | 0:11:13 | |
No. No, no, no, no, no. | 0:11:13 | 0:11:15 | |
Look, politics is a war, and politicians, | 0:11:15 | 0:11:17 | |
sometimes they lose ideological limbs. Right? | 0:11:17 | 0:11:19 | |
They get media shrapnel right in the face. | 0:11:19 | 0:11:21 | |
Sometimes they get a bullet right in the brain. | 0:11:21 | 0:11:24 | |
Civilians know there is no way that I would ever attack a civilian, | 0:11:24 | 0:11:30 | |
a real person, and especially not somebody | 0:11:30 | 0:11:32 | |
with a history of mental illness. | 0:11:32 | 0:11:34 | |
Because that sort of thing... | 0:11:34 | 0:11:36 | |
makes me queasy. | 0:11:36 | 0:11:39 | |
So you're an ethical...leaker? | 0:11:39 | 0:11:42 | |
I use leaking to show up corruption, to show up hypocrisy, | 0:11:42 | 0:11:46 | |
to show up idiocy. | 0:11:46 | 0:11:48 | |
And also the fourth horseman of the political apocalypse, duplicity. | 0:11:48 | 0:11:52 | |
For instance, Fergus Williams... | 0:11:52 | 0:11:54 | |
-He's coming up next, right? -Mm-hmm. | 0:11:54 | 0:11:57 | |
This is a guy, he's a member of the junior party in this coalition, right? | 0:11:57 | 0:12:01 | |
This guy has already opened a private channel to Dan Miller, | 0:12:01 | 0:12:04 | |
the Leader of the Opposition, | 0:12:04 | 0:12:06 | |
in order to talk about possibly setting up a coalition with him, | 0:12:06 | 0:12:10 | |
because he knows very well that this coalition government that he is lumbered with | 0:12:10 | 0:12:14 | |
is being torn to pieces, like a bread stick at a picnic. | 0:12:14 | 0:12:17 | |
Mr Tucker, you have just used this inquiry | 0:12:17 | 0:12:20 | |
to commit a leak in front of us! | 0:12:20 | 0:12:22 | |
I've not committed a leak! Everybody in Westminster knows these talks have taken place. Everyone. | 0:12:22 | 0:12:27 | |
You're supposed to be investigating this, discovering this stuff. | 0:12:27 | 0:12:30 | |
Now, you cannot not know what I or anyone else tell you. Right? | 0:12:30 | 0:12:34 | |
You can't not know that. You cannot not know what you now know. | 0:12:34 | 0:12:37 | |
Mr Tucker, are you familiar with the rules of association football? | 0:12:37 | 0:12:40 | |
I understand if you're going to have an affair you'd better take precautions, | 0:12:40 | 0:12:44 | |
-like getting a superinjunction. -I ask you because this is me giving you a yellow card. | 0:12:44 | 0:12:48 | |
You're not to use this inquiry to score political points. | 0:12:48 | 0:12:52 | |
Sorry, I'm...I apologise. | 0:12:52 | 0:12:54 | |
Did you see Mr Malcolm Tucker's evidence earlier? | 0:12:54 | 0:12:57 | |
Er, yeah, I, er, saw it out of the corner of my eye. | 0:12:57 | 0:13:02 | |
-Do you want me to read what he said about you? -No, that's fine. That was the bit that I saw. | 0:13:02 | 0:13:06 | |
-Embarrassing, I imagine. -Er, no, not at all. | 0:13:06 | 0:13:09 | |
Er, it was, er...almost flattering, yeah, | 0:13:09 | 0:13:12 | |
to get, er, to get Tuckered. | 0:13:12 | 0:13:14 | |
It's a right of passage in...in...in politics. | 0:13:14 | 0:13:16 | |
It happens to all of us, it's... | 0:13:16 | 0:13:18 | |
You know, it's like when you're in a Russian jail, you get your face tattooed. | 0:13:18 | 0:13:21 | |
Mr Tucker mentioned meetings between you and the Leader of the Opposition. | 0:13:21 | 0:13:26 | |
Did these take place? | 0:13:26 | 0:13:27 | |
They did, yes. Er, myself and Adam | 0:13:29 | 0:13:33 | |
were part of a team who had very general, non-committal discussions | 0:13:33 | 0:13:36 | |
with, amongst others... Mr Miller. | 0:13:36 | 0:13:38 | |
And you discussed a potential future coalition with his party | 0:13:38 | 0:13:42 | |
and the removal of your own party leader, is that correct? | 0:13:42 | 0:13:45 | |
Sorry, could I... possibly answer that question with another question? | 0:13:45 | 0:13:49 | |
I mean, not THAT question I'm just asking but a further question. | 0:13:49 | 0:13:52 | |
Go on. | 0:13:52 | 0:13:54 | |
You do realise that YOU'RE being spun here? You do see that? | 0:13:54 | 0:13:57 | |
-Spun? -Cos, you know... -LAUGHS NERVOUSLY | 0:13:57 | 0:13:59 | |
Malcolm Tucker's not your common or garden spin...doctor, right? | 0:13:59 | 0:14:02 | |
No, he's the, he's the chief medical officer of spin. | 0:14:02 | 0:14:05 | |
He is Spinoza, you see, so he'd... He had... | 0:14:05 | 0:14:08 | |
He didn't come here in order to answer your questions, | 0:14:08 | 0:14:11 | |
he came here in order to get you to then ask HIS questions... | 0:14:11 | 0:14:14 | |
Mr Williams, I don't want you to answer with another question, I want you to answer it with an answer. | 0:14:14 | 0:14:19 | |
He's conducting you like, um... | 0:14:19 | 0:14:21 | |
..Goldie. | 0:14:23 | 0:14:24 | |
Did you talk to Mr Miller about removing your party leader? | 0:14:24 | 0:14:27 | |
Sorry, are you getting Tucker's questions sort of beamed straight into your brain? | 0:14:27 | 0:14:31 | |
Mr Williams. | 0:14:31 | 0:14:33 | |
Finally, on the subject of frustration, | 0:14:33 | 0:14:37 | |
would you say it's difficult to steer policy ideas through your department? | 0:14:37 | 0:14:42 | |
Huh... | 0:14:42 | 0:14:43 | |
Er, yes, there are... | 0:14:44 | 0:14:46 | |
..blockages. There is one person in particular, | 0:14:47 | 0:14:50 | |
and, well, you know, I don't want to identify her...or him, | 0:14:50 | 0:14:53 | |
if she was a man, but this particular person, er... | 0:14:53 | 0:14:56 | |
is...er, rather inept, | 0:14:56 | 0:14:59 | |
and has hampered a lot of our initiatives, | 0:14:59 | 0:15:01 | |
and she, or her-him, is, um... | 0:15:01 | 0:15:05 | |
..very difficult to remove. | 0:15:06 | 0:15:08 | |
And so she's a... He is a... | 0:15:08 | 0:15:10 | |
They are a stubborn blockage, shall we say, | 0:15:10 | 0:15:14 | |
like, you know, when you get hair and, um, soap in a plughole, | 0:15:14 | 0:15:19 | |
with...skin flakes. | 0:15:19 | 0:15:21 | |
Thank you. Thank you, Mr Williams. That's, that's fine. | 0:15:21 | 0:15:24 | |
-Sorry, can I just say... -We are very pressed for time. | 0:15:24 | 0:15:27 | |
Yeah, but I really didn't want the last thing that I said, erm... | 0:15:27 | 0:15:30 | |
-I'm sorry. -..to be skin flakes. -Thank you. | 0:15:30 | 0:15:33 | |
When did you first become aware of Mr Tickel? | 0:15:33 | 0:15:36 | |
When he became the only, erm, key worker | 0:15:36 | 0:15:40 | |
to refuse our offer of alternative accommodation. | 0:15:40 | 0:15:44 | |
Then he sort of dropped off my radar. | 0:15:44 | 0:15:47 | |
The next thing I knew, he was sewing badges on his tent | 0:15:47 | 0:15:50 | |
and shouting abuse through a loudhailer. | 0:15:50 | 0:15:53 | |
Did you ever feel yourself to be culpable in any way for his... | 0:15:53 | 0:15:56 | |
for his homelessness? | 0:15:56 | 0:15:58 | |
Look, he was homeless only in the sense that he had no home. Er... | 0:15:58 | 0:16:02 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:16:02 | 0:16:04 | |
No, no, a housing association flat was found, which he declined. | 0:16:04 | 0:16:09 | |
The POLICY didn't make him homeless. | 0:16:09 | 0:16:11 | |
The policy of selling off the block of flats where he lived. | 0:16:11 | 0:16:15 | |
He made a positive decision to be homeless. | 0:16:15 | 0:16:18 | |
It's the difference between being punched in the face and punching yourself in the face. | 0:16:18 | 0:16:22 | |
SNIGGERING | 0:16:22 | 0:16:24 | |
Um... | 0:16:24 | 0:16:25 | |
Well, and why do you think, to use your phrase, | 0:16:25 | 0:16:27 | |
he punched himself in the face? | 0:16:27 | 0:16:30 | |
Why? Well, because he was mentally, er, er... | 0:16:30 | 0:16:33 | |
Because he...he had, er... | 0:16:33 | 0:16:36 | |
mental issues. | 0:16:36 | 0:16:37 | |
The e-mail leaked to The Guardian, | 0:16:37 | 0:16:40 | |
which you'll find on pages 276 to 277 in the evidence, | 0:16:40 | 0:16:44 | |
one of your advisers describes Mr Tickel as... | 0:16:44 | 0:16:49 | |
erm, "fucking Florence Shiteingale". | 0:16:49 | 0:16:51 | |
Do you not feel that's, er, a little callous? | 0:16:51 | 0:16:54 | |
This is, this is rough and tumble office banter, | 0:16:54 | 0:16:58 | |
schoolboy showers stuff, and schoolgirls' showers, er... | 0:16:58 | 0:17:02 | |
Not that... I mean, not, not literally, but, er... | 0:17:02 | 0:17:05 | |
Are you familiar with the phrase "data smuggling"? | 0:17:06 | 0:17:10 | |
Data...what? | 0:17:10 | 0:17:11 | |
Passing on data from a closed system to an unauthorised source in exchange for money. | 0:17:11 | 0:17:16 | |
Oh, yes, I...I... Well, seems everyone's at it. | 0:17:16 | 0:17:19 | |
A...are you at it, Mr Mannion? | 0:17:19 | 0:17:22 | |
No, I'm...I'm...I'm not very good with technology. | 0:17:22 | 0:17:25 | |
The Papermate pen is still cutting-edge technology as far as I'm concerned. | 0:17:25 | 0:17:30 | |
Writes upside-down, you know! | 0:17:30 | 0:17:33 | |
You've told the enquiry that you didn't feel at all guilty | 0:17:33 | 0:17:37 | |
over Mr Tickel's death. | 0:17:37 | 0:17:39 | |
Well, I...I felt bad. B...but not guilty. | 0:17:39 | 0:17:43 | |
I didn't kill him, I've never killed anyone. | 0:17:43 | 0:17:45 | |
Noted, but I mean, do you think you could've made a difference | 0:17:45 | 0:17:48 | |
-if you had been contactable that day? -Why? | 0:17:48 | 0:17:51 | |
He wasn't trying to call me. I...I'm not The Samaritans. | 0:17:51 | 0:17:55 | |
In fact, | 0:17:55 | 0:17:56 | |
apparently, tonally, I have a very depressing voice. | 0:17:56 | 0:18:01 | |
Mr Mannion, do you know Mr Alastair Leyton, | 0:18:01 | 0:18:04 | |
a senior executive at The Times? | 0:18:04 | 0:18:06 | |
Yes. | 0:18:08 | 0:18:09 | |
Did you ring Mr Leyton on 25th April | 0:18:09 | 0:18:11 | |
to tell him that Mr Tickel's medical records had been unlawfully obtained | 0:18:11 | 0:18:16 | |
and that this might form the basis of an explosive news story? | 0:18:16 | 0:18:19 | |
Did I, er, ring him on that day, do you mean? | 0:18:19 | 0:18:22 | |
I, well, I can't remember. | 0:18:22 | 0:18:24 | |
Well, did you ring him on any day telling him? | 0:18:24 | 0:18:27 | |
Look, I came into politics to make a difference, | 0:18:27 | 0:18:30 | |
t...to dare, to get things done, | 0:18:30 | 0:18:32 | |
n...not to leak things, | 0:18:32 | 0:18:35 | |
or...or spin, or...or blag, | 0:18:35 | 0:18:38 | |
or...smuggle, | 0:18:38 | 0:18:40 | |
but to serve, with honest, hard work. | 0:18:40 | 0:18:43 | |
To do. | 0:18:43 | 0:18:44 | |
And did you DO something? Did you contact your friend at The Times? | 0:18:44 | 0:18:48 | |
No, I...I didn't do that. | 0:18:49 | 0:18:51 | |
Perhaps we could start by just giving us an idea | 0:18:52 | 0:18:55 | |
of what a... You know, what a special adviser does? | 0:18:55 | 0:18:58 | |
Um, er... | 0:19:00 | 0:19:02 | |
Well, technically, essentially, we just advise a minister. | 0:19:02 | 0:19:06 | |
Erm, sort of, media strategies, political strategies... | 0:19:06 | 0:19:10 | |
that sort of thing. | 0:19:10 | 0:19:11 | |
But you're not permanent members of the Civil Service? | 0:19:11 | 0:19:15 | |
Er, no, they're like the... the worker ants. | 0:19:15 | 0:19:18 | |
We're more like... Er, well, not the queens. | 0:19:18 | 0:19:20 | |
That would be, er, Peter Mannion and to a lesser extent Fergus Williams. | 0:19:20 | 0:19:24 | |
We're more like the solider ants that defend the queens. | 0:19:24 | 0:19:29 | |
Would you like to add anything, Mr Kenyon? | 0:19:29 | 0:19:32 | |
Yes, I'm not sure that the ant analogy helps... | 0:19:32 | 0:19:36 | |
at all. | 0:19:36 | 0:19:37 | |
Mr Smith, how would you characterise your relationship with Mr Kenyon? | 0:19:38 | 0:19:44 | |
Er, well, I... I...I think when you get two silverbacks like Adam and I in a room, | 0:19:45 | 0:19:50 | |
there's always going to be a certain amount of chest-beating, but, erm... | 0:19:50 | 0:19:54 | |
there's a mutual respect. | 0:19:54 | 0:19:55 | |
Would you agree, Mr Kenyon? | 0:19:55 | 0:19:57 | |
Yes. | 0:19:59 | 0:20:00 | |
What about data smuggling? | 0:20:02 | 0:20:03 | |
I...is that something that you were aware of? | 0:20:03 | 0:20:06 | |
Yeah, I mean of...of course I was aware of it. I think we all were... | 0:20:06 | 0:20:09 | |
-Absolutely. -Yeah. | 0:20:09 | 0:20:11 | |
..but I would say, I would say it was, er, it was endemic, it happens every time. | 0:20:11 | 0:20:14 | |
-Endemic? -It's commonplace. | 0:20:14 | 0:20:16 | |
Hospitals, er, anywhere with public information. | 0:20:16 | 0:20:20 | |
GPs, passport offices, you know, you name it, | 0:20:20 | 0:20:23 | |
they've all been known to slip information for money. | 0:20:23 | 0:20:26 | |
Do any of you know of specific individuals | 0:20:26 | 0:20:29 | |
who will offer this... this information trade? | 0:20:29 | 0:20:33 | |
-No. -I don't, no. -No. | 0:20:33 | 0:20:34 | |
Right, so just to clarify, you say that it's endemic... | 0:20:34 | 0:20:37 | |
Rife, absolutely. | 0:20:37 | 0:20:39 | |
..but you don't know anyone who actually does it? | 0:20:39 | 0:20:42 | |
-No. -No. | 0:20:42 | 0:20:43 | |
No, I mean, I could if I needed to. I... | 0:20:43 | 0:20:45 | |
have a very wide web of contacts. | 0:20:45 | 0:20:47 | |
Right, but it's not contacts... | 0:20:47 | 0:20:49 | |
-not contacts that you use? -Er, no. | 0:20:49 | 0:20:52 | |
My position is, if you leak, you're weak. | 0:20:52 | 0:20:55 | |
If I'm going to come at you, I'm going to come at you head on... | 0:20:55 | 0:20:58 | |
man-on-man. | 0:20:58 | 0:20:59 | |
That's how I like it... Er, politically speaking. | 0:20:59 | 0:21:02 | |
You yourselves were subject to a leak, weren't you, in The Guardian? | 0:21:03 | 0:21:08 | |
How did you feel about the e-mail containing your thoughts | 0:21:08 | 0:21:12 | |
about Mr Tickel's death? | 0:21:12 | 0:21:15 | |
Um, it was, it was shameful and it was insensitive... | 0:21:15 | 0:21:19 | |
-Absolutely. -..and we would like to apologise for that. | 0:21:19 | 0:21:22 | |
-It's, it's dreadful. -I agree. | 0:21:22 | 0:21:24 | |
I mean, their comments were absolutely unforgivable, mortifying. | 0:21:24 | 0:21:29 | |
"How many Mr Tickels does it take to change a lightbulb?" | 0:21:29 | 0:21:34 | |
"He doesn't have a lightbulb, he's in a tent." | 0:21:34 | 0:21:37 | |
Mmm... | 0:21:37 | 0:21:38 | |
"How do you turn Mr Tickel into Mr Happy?" | 0:21:38 | 0:21:41 | |
"Lithium." | 0:21:41 | 0:21:43 | |
"What's the difference between Mr Tickel and Captain Oates?" | 0:21:43 | 0:21:46 | |
"Captain Oates has a less stupid name." | 0:21:46 | 0:21:49 | |
And one feel that is particularly cruel, Ms Messinger, | 0:21:49 | 0:21:53 | |
-given... -Mmm. | 0:21:53 | 0:21:55 | |
..Mr Tickel's mental health, erm, issues. | 0:21:55 | 0:21:58 | |
"The fucker's a nutbag." | 0:21:58 | 0:22:00 | |
I'm s...sor... I...I...I... | 0:22:00 | 0:22:02 | |
It... That is not OK. | 0:22:02 | 0:22:04 | |
Sorry. | 0:22:04 | 0:22:06 | |
If I could add a...a...a... a mea culpa here, | 0:22:06 | 0:22:09 | |
rather than-than dancing around it. | 0:22:09 | 0:22:11 | |
Others may choose to attempt to wriggle off the hook of, er, shame, | 0:22:11 | 0:22:16 | |
but, um, I cannot. | 0:22:16 | 0:22:18 | |
I cannot deny that my name is on those e-mails, | 0:22:18 | 0:22:21 | |
and yet I do not recognise that man. | 0:22:21 | 0:22:23 | |
It is me and yet it is another, and for that I am, um, truly sorry. | 0:22:23 | 0:22:28 | |
This has been a humbling moment in my quest | 0:22:28 | 0:22:31 | |
to become the man I know I can be. | 0:22:31 | 0:22:34 | |
How did you react to the news of Mr Tickel's death? | 0:22:36 | 0:22:41 | |
-Shock. Absolute shock. -Fell to pieces. -Devastation. | 0:22:41 | 0:22:44 | |
Awful, I mean we couldn't believe it, it was...tragic... | 0:22:44 | 0:22:47 | |
Can I just refer you to Dr Tara Strachan, | 0:22:47 | 0:22:49 | |
who I believe was in your department for a meeting at that time, | 0:22:49 | 0:22:53 | |
and she described the atmosphere in the office | 0:22:53 | 0:22:57 | |
as an atmosphere of elation, | 0:22:57 | 0:22:59 | |
and you, Mr Smith, were seen to be punching the air. | 0:22:59 | 0:23:03 | |
Do you remember doing that? | 0:23:03 | 0:23:05 | |
I, er... I do not remember to that. | 0:23:05 | 0:23:07 | |
S... Well, if you weren't punching the air, do you remember what you were doing? | 0:23:07 | 0:23:11 | |
I...I cannot say to that. | 0:23:12 | 0:23:15 | |
Is it fair to say that information coming in and out of DoSAC is... | 0:23:15 | 0:23:18 | |
sticky, for want of a better word? | 0:23:18 | 0:23:20 | |
Yes. I would certainly agree with that...to that. | 0:23:20 | 0:23:24 | |
If I...if I may speak freely at this point, | 0:23:24 | 0:23:27 | |
I...I think the reason for a lot of leaks coming out of DoSAC is that | 0:23:27 | 0:23:32 | |
it's very hard to get information out of the official channels. | 0:23:32 | 0:23:35 | |
-There's a kind of blockage, is there? -Exactly that. | 0:23:35 | 0:23:38 | |
Um, and an information blockage. Er, and it...and it... | 0:23:38 | 0:23:42 | |
and it has to find its way out through other...routes. | 0:23:42 | 0:23:44 | |
No, it is actually Terri Coverley, um... | 0:23:44 | 0:23:48 | |
who is Head of Press, in name only. | 0:23:48 | 0:23:51 | |
-Good, yes. It's Terri, definitely. -Yep. | 0:23:51 | 0:23:54 | |
I, Teresa Jessica Coverley, do sincerely declare and affirm | 0:23:55 | 0:24:00 | |
that the evidence I shall give will be the truth, | 0:24:00 | 0:24:03 | |
the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. | 0:24:03 | 0:24:06 | |
-Please be seated, Mrs Coverley. -Thank you very much. | 0:24:06 | 0:24:09 | |
Mr Hodge has some questions. | 0:24:09 | 0:24:10 | |
Very good to see you this morning, infamous Terri Coverley. | 0:24:10 | 0:24:13 | |
SHE LAUGHS DARKLY | 0:24:13 | 0:24:15 | |
-Why are you smiling? -I'm not smiling. | 0:24:15 | 0:24:17 | |
Yeah, or rather I'm smiling, but it's something I do when I'm nervous, erm... | 0:24:18 | 0:24:22 | |
-And you have a guilty conscience? -No, no. No, no. | 0:24:22 | 0:24:25 | |
No, I don't have a guilty conscience but I do have a guilty face. | 0:24:25 | 0:24:28 | |
Um, I...I... | 0:24:28 | 0:24:30 | |
I do blush a lot and that's a circulation thing, not a moral thing, | 0:24:30 | 0:24:34 | |
though I do ACT guilty, um... | 0:24:34 | 0:24:36 | |
When I was a child, um... | 0:24:37 | 0:24:40 | |
my brother's hamster was put into a remote control...aeroplane. | 0:24:40 | 0:24:44 | |
Tragic consequences, and, um... unfortunately I was blamed for that, | 0:24:44 | 0:24:47 | |
though I had nothing to do with it. It was...it was that I just looked guilty, | 0:24:47 | 0:24:51 | |
so I would ask you... to bear that in mind. | 0:24:51 | 0:24:53 | |
Can you explain to us how communications works in government? | 0:24:53 | 0:24:58 | |
Well, um, I use an analogy. | 0:24:58 | 0:25:00 | |
Erm... | 0:25:00 | 0:25:02 | |
I like to think that dealing with the press | 0:25:02 | 0:25:04 | |
is not so much herding cats, it's more herding sheep, | 0:25:04 | 0:25:08 | |
and I am the shepherdess, um...if you like. | 0:25:08 | 0:25:13 | |
It's, it's... In order to be an efficient shepherdess, | 0:25:13 | 0:25:16 | |
one needs a number of things, I mean... | 0:25:16 | 0:25:19 | |
Firstly, one needs a whistle, that's my voice. | 0:25:20 | 0:25:24 | |
Secondly, one needs a coat, and that's my coat. | 0:25:24 | 0:25:28 | |
And thirdly, one needs a dog, | 0:25:28 | 0:25:30 | |
and that, in my case, is a lady called Robyn. | 0:25:30 | 0:25:33 | |
How was your relationship with Nicola Murray? | 0:25:33 | 0:25:36 | |
Professionally or personally? | 0:25:36 | 0:25:38 | |
-Professionally. -Not good. | 0:25:38 | 0:25:40 | |
And personally? | 0:25:42 | 0:25:43 | |
Not good. No, I mean she resented me, she was jealous of me, I think. | 0:25:43 | 0:25:47 | |
I mean, a lot of women are. | 0:25:47 | 0:25:48 | |
It's no secret that... Well, she's a woman who has issues, er... | 0:25:48 | 0:25:53 | |
Major issues. | 0:25:53 | 0:25:55 | |
I felt... If you want me to be truthful, I felt very sorry for her. | 0:25:55 | 0:26:00 | |
And your relationship with Peter Mannion? | 0:26:00 | 0:26:02 | |
Oh... | 0:26:02 | 0:26:04 | |
Yeah, very, very, very good. | 0:26:04 | 0:26:06 | |
Um, yes. Both professionally and personally. | 0:26:06 | 0:26:10 | |
Although of course, I... I draw a...you know, between the two. | 0:26:10 | 0:26:14 | |
But he's a lovely man to...work with, to be...to be with, | 0:26:14 | 0:26:20 | |
to be close to, and... | 0:26:20 | 0:26:23 | |
Several others have referred to you as a blockage. | 0:26:23 | 0:26:26 | |
Perhaps they meant... | 0:26:26 | 0:26:27 | |
"buffer". | 0:26:27 | 0:26:29 | |
Because I am a buffer between their heads... | 0:26:30 | 0:26:34 | |
and things that want to hurt their heads. | 0:26:34 | 0:26:37 | |
Who, in your opinion, | 0:26:37 | 0:26:38 | |
was responsible for the PFI e-mail being leaked? | 0:26:38 | 0:26:42 | |
Well, it's not for me to say, | 0:26:42 | 0:26:44 | |
and I don't want to be accused of telling tales before school... | 0:26:44 | 0:26:48 | |
But I think it was Malcolm Tucker. | 0:26:48 | 0:26:50 | |
-Why do you think that? -Erm... | 0:26:50 | 0:26:52 | |
Feminine intuition. | 0:26:52 | 0:26:54 | |
Feel it in my water. | 0:26:54 | 0:26:56 | |
Any reasons beyond your bladder? | 0:26:56 | 0:26:58 | |
Well, Malcolm can be very, very tough. I mean, that's no secret. | 0:26:58 | 0:27:03 | |
Can you give me an example? | 0:27:03 | 0:27:04 | |
Well, he can send very forthright texts. | 0:27:04 | 0:27:07 | |
Would you say he was bullying? | 0:27:07 | 0:27:09 | |
Well, I can look after myself. | 0:27:09 | 0:27:11 | |
I mean, I wasn't bullied at school. I was very popular. | 0:27:11 | 0:27:15 | |
But if you were somebody w...who... who had been bullied at school, | 0:27:15 | 0:27:19 | |
somebody who was weak or not popular, | 0:27:19 | 0:27:22 | |
someone like Robyn, for example, yes, I think Malcolm Tucker | 0:27:22 | 0:27:26 | |
would be very, very intimidating indeed, yes... | 0:27:26 | 0:27:29 | |
You're happy to go on record saying Malcolm was a bully? | 0:27:29 | 0:27:31 | |
-Um... -Malcolm is a bully? | 0:27:33 | 0:27:36 | |
Mmm... | 0:27:37 | 0:27:38 | |
We'll need a yes or a no. | 0:27:38 | 0:27:39 | |
Well, yes, then. Yes. | 0:27:41 | 0:27:43 | |
Mr Tucker is in next. I can't imagine he'll be very happy about that. | 0:27:43 | 0:27:47 | |
No, he won't. No, he won't. | 0:27:47 | 0:27:49 | |
(Right...) Well, I think we can leave it there, Mrs Coverley. | 0:27:49 | 0:27:53 | |
Oh, good. Sorry, I mean, thank you. | 0:27:53 | 0:27:56 | |
Thank you, thank you very much... | 0:27:56 | 0:27:58 | |
..Your Lordship. | 0:27:59 | 0:28:01 | |
We may need to call you back, | 0:28:01 | 0:28:03 | |
as I feel there are some issues that still need clarification. | 0:28:03 | 0:28:06 | |
Very good, yes, of course. | 0:28:06 | 0:28:08 | |
Thank you for agreeing to return to us at such short notice, Mr Tucker. | 0:28:08 | 0:28:11 | |
It's no problem. You only appear in front of the Goolding Inquiry twice, | 0:28:11 | 0:28:15 | |
-once on the way up and once on the way down. -Let's hope not. | 0:28:15 | 0:28:17 | |
Glad to see you again, Mr Tucker. | 0:28:17 | 0:28:20 | |
Nice to be here. | 0:28:20 | 0:28:22 | |
Did you watch the evidence given by Terri Coverley? | 0:28:22 | 0:28:25 | |
Yes. And I found her quite funny, without resulting to vulgarity. | 0:28:25 | 0:28:29 | |
She was very clear that she regarded you as a bully, | 0:28:29 | 0:28:34 | |
something you denied in your first testimony. | 0:28:34 | 0:28:36 | |
How do you respond to that? | 0:28:36 | 0:28:37 | |
Um, well, I respond thusly. That's slander. | 0:28:37 | 0:28:41 | |
We're trying to clarify the culture of communications | 0:28:41 | 0:28:45 | |
over which you presided. | 0:28:45 | 0:28:46 | |
And we have a contradiction between participants. | 0:28:46 | 0:28:49 | |
Well, I would say that I'm someone who lives and breathes communication, | 0:28:49 | 0:28:53 | |
so I would lend more weight to my words, | 0:28:53 | 0:28:57 | |
rather than to someone who is just in it for the pension. | 0:28:57 | 0:29:00 | |
And how is that not slander? | 0:29:00 | 0:29:03 | |
Well, because that's true. | 0:29:03 | 0:29:05 | |
She wants a pension more than Richard Hammond wants a punch in the face. | 0:29:05 | 0:29:09 | |
You know, she sat here for an hour. | 0:29:09 | 0:29:11 | |
You can't have looked at her and thought this was not a person who isn't mentally unrobust? | 0:29:11 | 0:29:16 | |
I'd like to return to the Batpeople photograph, if I may. | 0:29:17 | 0:29:21 | |
Why not? Yes, one of my triumphs. | 0:29:21 | 0:29:24 | |
You said you were cropped out of the original photo. | 0:29:24 | 0:29:27 | |
Sadly, yes. | 0:29:27 | 0:29:28 | |
But they have enlarged. Can we show the enlargement? | 0:29:28 | 0:29:31 | |
They've enlarged that photograph for us. | 0:29:31 | 0:29:34 | |
Now, could we go to the close-up of the folders | 0:29:34 | 0:29:37 | |
that you're carrying... | 0:29:37 | 0:29:39 | |
..in that photograph, there we are. | 0:29:40 | 0:29:42 | |
-Who enlarged this? -Er... | 0:29:42 | 0:29:44 | |
-Was it The Guardian that did this for you? -I believe so... | 0:29:44 | 0:29:46 | |
I didn't know they were offering that service. They should do passport photos. | 0:29:46 | 0:29:50 | |
-Thank you. -They'd double their revenue if they did passport photos a couple of times. | 0:29:50 | 0:29:53 | |
This is the folder that you are carrying in your hand, | 0:29:53 | 0:29:56 | |
and you see there there's a document poking up out of the top, | 0:29:56 | 0:29:59 | |
on the notepad. | 0:29:59 | 0:30:01 | |
Um, there's a series of numbers written across the top there. | 0:30:01 | 0:30:05 | |
Would you be able to tell us what the first two numbers are? | 0:30:05 | 0:30:08 | |
I don't... Well, they look like telephone numbers, I don't know. | 0:30:08 | 0:30:10 | |
Yes, they are Mr Tickel's mobile phone number | 0:30:10 | 0:30:14 | |
and his ex-wife's landline number. | 0:30:14 | 0:30:16 | |
Yeah. | 0:30:17 | 0:30:18 | |
Well, there's nothing untoward about me having those. | 0:30:20 | 0:30:23 | |
Well, actually Mrs Tickel's phone number was ex-directory. | 0:30:23 | 0:30:27 | |
But let's just leave that to one side for a moment. | 0:30:27 | 0:30:29 | |
Very wise. | 0:30:29 | 0:30:30 | |
The bottom set of numbers. | 0:30:30 | 0:30:33 | |
Do you have any recollection as to what they might be? | 0:30:33 | 0:30:35 | |
No. | 0:30:35 | 0:30:36 | |
Really? You didn't even look. | 0:30:38 | 0:30:39 | |
Where are we going with this? | 0:30:41 | 0:30:42 | |
They are Mr Tickel's NHS number | 0:30:44 | 0:30:47 | |
and his National Insurance number. | 0:30:47 | 0:30:50 | |
Mr Tucker. | 0:30:52 | 0:30:53 | |
Ffff... | 0:30:53 | 0:30:54 | |
So why would you have that? | 0:30:57 | 0:30:59 | |
I don't, I don't recall... | 0:31:08 | 0:31:10 | |
Sorry, can I just clarify that? | 0:31:11 | 0:31:13 | |
Are you saying you don't recall having them, | 0:31:13 | 0:31:16 | |
or you don't recall how you obtained them? | 0:31:16 | 0:31:18 | |
Um... | 0:31:18 | 0:31:19 | |
I don't... recall having them! | 0:31:22 | 0:31:26 | |
But it... It appears to me that you have been rather careless | 0:31:28 | 0:31:32 | |
in this instance, Mr Tucker. | 0:31:32 | 0:31:33 | |
Not at all. | 0:31:33 | 0:31:35 | |
No? You were photographed with these papers, | 0:31:35 | 0:31:39 | |
you flaunted your ruse to puff yourself up, | 0:31:39 | 0:31:43 | |
thereby drawing attention to this photograph, | 0:31:43 | 0:31:46 | |
this photograph which is now implicating you | 0:31:46 | 0:31:48 | |
in a rather troubling way. | 0:31:48 | 0:31:50 | |
Sorry, I didn't hear a question there. | 0:31:53 | 0:31:55 | |
Is there a question here? | 0:31:55 | 0:31:56 | |
It was an observation, Mr Tucker. | 0:31:56 | 0:31:57 | |
It's an observation, | 0:31:57 | 0:31:59 | |
so what are we, is this an inquiry or an observatory? | 0:31:59 | 0:32:02 | |
It's an opticians. | 0:32:02 | 0:32:03 | |
You'd like a question. Here is a question for you. | 0:32:03 | 0:32:06 | |
Do you have an explanation for having these numbers? | 0:32:06 | 0:32:10 | |
Those numbers are not necessarily what you say they are. | 0:32:19 | 0:32:22 | |
Did you request this information? | 0:32:24 | 0:32:26 | |
Um... | 0:32:27 | 0:32:29 | |
Because, Mr Tucker, if you didn't request the information, the only | 0:32:33 | 0:32:36 | |
other way that it could have come to you would have been if somebody had | 0:32:36 | 0:32:41 | |
supplied you with his NHS number, which would, of course, be illegal. | 0:32:41 | 0:32:45 | |
Yes. | 0:32:45 | 0:32:46 | |
Yes. As would obtaining his health records | 0:32:46 | 0:32:49 | |
and releasing them to the press. | 0:32:49 | 0:32:51 | |
Which you denied all knowledge of earlier, | 0:32:51 | 0:32:54 | |
and you would have committed a crime. | 0:32:54 | 0:32:56 | |
Well, I... | 0:32:56 | 0:32:57 | |
Mr Tucker, a very serious crime. | 0:32:57 | 0:32:58 | |
Well, as you say, I denied it. | 0:32:58 | 0:33:00 | |
Yes. And, um... | 0:33:00 | 0:33:02 | |
Do you repeat that denial here? | 0:33:03 | 0:33:05 | |
I'm not sure that you know exactly how this all works. | 0:33:09 | 0:33:13 | |
Mr Tucker, are you repeating that denial? | 0:33:13 | 0:33:17 | |
Yes, I'm... | 0:33:19 | 0:33:20 | |
I... I am. | 0:33:21 | 0:33:22 | |
I deny it. I do deny it. | 0:33:24 | 0:33:26 | |
Thank you. | 0:33:27 | 0:33:29 | |
Of course you were, until quite recently, Leader of the Opposition. | 0:33:29 | 0:33:32 | |
You led your party for... | 0:33:32 | 0:33:33 | |
For two years, yes. | 0:33:33 | 0:33:35 | |
For 22 months and nine days. | 0:33:35 | 0:33:36 | |
Yes, I was rounding up. | 0:33:36 | 0:33:38 | |
How does it feel to lose that position so abruptly, | 0:33:38 | 0:33:41 | |
and so publicly? | 0:33:41 | 0:33:42 | |
Um, horrible. It feels horrible. | 0:33:43 | 0:33:47 | |
I think I felt as I would feel | 0:33:47 | 0:33:49 | |
if I were being strangled to death by somebody I trusted. | 0:33:49 | 0:33:53 | |
Yes, er, the press have been unkind to you over | 0:33:53 | 0:33:57 | |
much of your recent career, haven't they? | 0:33:57 | 0:34:00 | |
Well, when you're a high-profile politician, | 0:34:00 | 0:34:02 | |
you expect to be in the public gaze. Um, I would say that there's a... | 0:34:02 | 0:34:06 | |
there's a certain level of extra scrutiny that is afforded | 0:34:06 | 0:34:11 | |
to women in the public gaze, I'm sure you would agree. | 0:34:11 | 0:34:14 | |
Well, you were, um, followed around for six months | 0:34:16 | 0:34:18 | |
by a man dressed as a pork chop. | 0:34:18 | 0:34:20 | |
Is that the particular kind of scrutiny that, | 0:34:20 | 0:34:23 | |
that you're saying is reserved for women? | 0:34:23 | 0:34:25 | |
No, that was just reserved for me. | 0:34:25 | 0:34:27 | |
If we, um, just could turn to tab 16. | 0:34:29 | 0:34:32 | |
We have some articles, there's quite a few, actually. | 0:34:32 | 0:34:36 | |
On top of the second page here there is an exploded view of your face. | 0:34:36 | 0:34:39 | |
Yes, well they have, um... | 0:34:39 | 0:34:41 | |
They have magnified a picture of my top lip, | 0:34:43 | 0:34:47 | |
er, in the hope of finding a moustache, which I do not have, | 0:34:47 | 0:34:50 | |
I never have had a moustache, so... | 0:34:50 | 0:34:53 | |
If we, er, yes, again, if we turn to the fourth page of this tab. | 0:34:53 | 0:34:58 | |
"Frumpy, grumpy and dangerous to know." | 0:35:00 | 0:35:03 | |
"How Nicola Murray went from gold to lead in six months." | 0:35:03 | 0:35:06 | |
I mean, this is typical of, er, of many of the pieces | 0:35:06 | 0:35:10 | |
printed about you at the time, about a year ago, wasn't it? | 0:35:10 | 0:35:12 | |
Yes, it was. | 0:35:12 | 0:35:14 | |
Over 35 major articles. | 0:35:14 | 0:35:16 | |
Yes. Yeah. | 0:35:16 | 0:35:18 | |
I mean, I suppose the point I'd make is that we're sitting here | 0:35:18 | 0:35:22 | |
in our ivory, um, inquiry. | 0:35:22 | 0:35:26 | |
and out there, in the real world, there is actual news happening. | 0:35:26 | 0:35:31 | |
You know, we've got the chief whip's office, you know, | 0:35:31 | 0:35:35 | |
during the course of this morning has come under very particular scrutiny, | 0:35:35 | 0:35:38 | |
there are funding issues, there's the justice minister crisis | 0:35:38 | 0:35:42 | |
that's suddenly sort of spiralling out of control. | 0:35:42 | 0:35:44 | |
I just, I don't quite know why we're, we're focussing on my moustache. | 0:35:44 | 0:35:48 | |
Which I don't have. | 0:35:48 | 0:35:49 | |
I'm afraid both of those very recent developments | 0:35:49 | 0:35:53 | |
may well be the subject of police investigations, | 0:35:53 | 0:35:55 | |
so cannot be discussed in this room. | 0:35:55 | 0:35:57 | |
Which shows they've done the job. | 0:35:57 | 0:36:00 | |
Done the job? | 0:36:00 | 0:36:02 | |
Well, it just seems to me that somebody is engineering | 0:36:02 | 0:36:05 | |
this flurry of press reports in order to divert attention from the, er, | 0:36:05 | 0:36:10 | |
shall we say dramatic revelations of this inquiry. I mean, it just, | 0:36:10 | 0:36:14 | |
it just seems like there's another story every five minutes. | 0:36:14 | 0:36:18 | |
And who would that somebody be? | 0:36:18 | 0:36:19 | |
Well, um. I... Maybe we should ask Taggart! | 0:36:21 | 0:36:24 | |
Would you care to make a specific allegation against someone? | 0:36:26 | 0:36:28 | |
Er, no I wouldn't care to, no. | 0:36:29 | 0:36:32 | |
On a completely unrelated matter, | 0:36:32 | 0:36:34 | |
Malcolm Tucker was pleased to see you go, is that a fair statement? | 0:36:34 | 0:36:39 | |
Yes, I think that would be fair to say. Yes. | 0:36:39 | 0:36:43 | |
Mmm. | 0:36:43 | 0:36:44 | |
Did he engineer the leaking of the e-mail that led to your resignation? | 0:36:44 | 0:36:48 | |
Er, well, I don't have any solid evidence | 0:36:48 | 0:36:53 | |
that he did that. Um... | 0:36:53 | 0:36:56 | |
MOBILE RINGS | 0:36:58 | 0:36:59 | |
Sounds like somebody else's career has just gone into the shredder! | 0:36:59 | 0:37:02 | |
I have asked for all mobile phones to be turned completely off, please. | 0:37:02 | 0:37:06 | |
I'm sorry, Mrs Murray. | 0:37:06 | 0:37:08 | |
Yes, it is... | 0:37:08 | 0:37:09 | |
Mr Hodge. | 0:37:09 | 0:37:11 | |
Mrs Murray, we spoke earlier about your husband's interests | 0:37:11 | 0:37:13 | |
in the key worker, er, housing sell off. | 0:37:13 | 0:37:15 | |
Yes, we spoke about his lack of interest in fact, to be precise. | 0:37:15 | 0:37:18 | |
Yes, well, I've no wish to retread that particular ground. | 0:37:18 | 0:37:20 | |
No, I've no wish to either, | 0:37:20 | 0:37:21 | |
I mean, I really do want to make that quite clear. | 0:37:21 | 0:37:24 | |
I'm finding this constant reiteration of my husband's, er, | 0:37:24 | 0:37:27 | |
innocent position to be wearing in the extreme. | 0:37:27 | 0:37:31 | |
Mrs Murray, may I remind you | 0:37:31 | 0:37:32 | |
that you did ask for this inquiry to be set up. | 0:37:32 | 0:37:34 | |
I didn't not want an inquiry. | 0:37:34 | 0:37:36 | |
Well, presumably there was something that you feel that needed | 0:37:36 | 0:37:39 | |
to be said, needed to be asked, about, er, about PFI, about leaking. | 0:37:39 | 0:37:43 | |
I think, er, that it's a good idea to have an inquiry | 0:37:43 | 0:37:47 | |
every now and then. I just think it, um... | 0:37:47 | 0:37:49 | |
Livens things up a bit. | 0:37:51 | 0:37:53 | |
On that subject, was it, um, | 0:37:53 | 0:37:55 | |
Mr Tucker who persuaded you call for an inquiry into Mr Tickel's death? | 0:37:55 | 0:38:00 | |
Er, I called for the inquiry | 0:38:00 | 0:38:03 | |
after Mr Tucker had spoken to me. | 0:38:03 | 0:38:08 | |
Is there a better party happening elsewhere? | 0:38:08 | 0:38:12 | |
I'm sorry Mrs Murray, in view of events developing | 0:38:12 | 0:38:14 | |
outside of this room, some of which may be subject to police | 0:38:14 | 0:38:18 | |
investigations, and consequently to re-examine the parameters | 0:38:18 | 0:38:22 | |
of this inquiry, I think we'll leave it there for the moment, Mrs Murray. | 0:38:22 | 0:38:26 | |
Well, yeah, I have actually prepared a very brief statement, | 0:38:26 | 0:38:28 | |
which I think will clarify my position on... | 0:38:28 | 0:38:31 | |
I'm afraid we don't have the time for that. | 0:38:31 | 0:38:32 | |
It is very brief. Um, I think it was Gandhi who once said | 0:38:32 | 0:38:36 | |
that an honest man is a gift from God and a gift to... | 0:38:36 | 0:38:39 | |
I'm sure a written submission will suffice. Thank you so much. | 0:38:39 | 0:38:44 | |
I'm now going to adjourn for a short period. | 0:38:44 | 0:38:46 | |
(Fuck's sake.) | 0:38:49 | 0:38:50 | |
Please be seated. Thank you for your attendance, Ms Murdoch. | 0:38:52 | 0:38:54 | |
Um, Mr Weir has some questions. | 0:38:56 | 0:39:00 | |
If I can turn to you, Ms Murdoch. | 0:39:00 | 0:39:02 | |
How would you describe your relationship with Ms Coverley? | 0:39:04 | 0:39:07 | |
Do you, do you get on well with her, with her? | 0:39:07 | 0:39:09 | |
No. | 0:39:09 | 0:39:10 | |
Can you, um... Can you expand on that for us a little? | 0:39:12 | 0:39:16 | |
No. | 0:39:18 | 0:39:19 | |
I do not... | 0:39:19 | 0:39:22 | |
..get on with her. | 0:39:22 | 0:39:24 | |
Um, we do not get on. | 0:39:24 | 0:39:27 | |
I think we do! | 0:39:27 | 0:39:28 | |
There may have been times when we do get on, and have got on. | 0:39:30 | 0:39:35 | |
-Um, I do not recall to that. -Thank you. | 0:39:35 | 0:39:38 | |
Ms Coverley, you compared Ms Murdoch to a dog and described her as weak | 0:39:39 | 0:39:44 | |
in our last interview. | 0:39:44 | 0:39:46 | |
Yeah, er, I like, I like weak dogs, I have, I have one myself, so... | 0:39:46 | 0:39:50 | |
Would you say that there is a culture of bullying within DoSAC? | 0:39:55 | 0:40:01 | |
If I could ask you first, Ms Murdoch. | 0:40:01 | 0:40:04 | |
Um, I'd say there was a culture of bullying ME at DoSAC. | 0:40:04 | 0:40:07 | |
You've experienced bullying there? | 0:40:07 | 0:40:09 | |
Well, you know, I, I see them all standing around, you know, | 0:40:09 | 0:40:12 | |
chattering like squirrels on Red Bull. | 0:40:12 | 0:40:14 | |
When I ask them what they're talking about, | 0:40:14 | 0:40:16 | |
they usually bark a tea order at me. | 0:40:16 | 0:40:19 | |
Or, you know, or call me, er, the blonde bombshite, | 0:40:19 | 0:40:23 | |
if I can use that word, or some other horrible sweary thing. | 0:40:23 | 0:40:27 | |
That's the form that the bullying takes? | 0:40:27 | 0:40:30 | |
And if you refuse to make your boss's tea, you know, | 0:40:30 | 0:40:33 | |
they, they call you Mariella Shitstrop. | 0:40:33 | 0:40:35 | |
Or Flouncy Sinatra, which, which doesn't even really work! | 0:40:35 | 0:40:39 | |
And can I ask you both about the leaked Guardian e-mail? | 0:40:40 | 0:40:44 | |
Oh, yes! | 0:40:44 | 0:40:45 | |
Ask anything you like, I don't know anything about that bit. | 0:40:45 | 0:40:48 | |
Yeah, thank you, Robyn. The e-mail was leaked from my computer, | 0:40:48 | 0:40:51 | |
which is proof that it was not me that sent it, um, | 0:40:51 | 0:40:55 | |
people do not leak from their own computers, that's not how it's done. | 0:40:55 | 0:40:59 | |
How is it done then, Mrs Coverley? | 0:40:59 | 0:41:01 | |
I don't know. | 0:41:01 | 0:41:02 | |
Well, you've just said something that implies | 0:41:02 | 0:41:05 | |
you do know how it's done. | 0:41:05 | 0:41:06 | |
I don't know. | 0:41:06 | 0:41:08 | |
How do you know, then, | 0:41:08 | 0:41:09 | |
that leaking is done from other people's computers? | 0:41:09 | 0:41:11 | |
Do you learn this from a leakers' charter? | 0:41:11 | 0:41:14 | |
Is it perhaps put up on a staff notice board? | 0:41:14 | 0:41:16 | |
Mr Glenn Cullen informed me. | 0:41:16 | 0:41:19 | |
He, er, he told me that if leaking is done, it's done from other computers. | 0:41:19 | 0:41:25 | |
Glenn Cullen. | 0:41:25 | 0:41:26 | |
Yeah, I'm not saying anything about Glenn Cullen himself, you understand. | 0:41:26 | 0:41:29 | |
You know, he is a very, very trustworthy individual. | 0:41:29 | 0:41:33 | |
Borderline priest. | 0:41:33 | 0:41:35 | |
No, Terri's right. I heard it was Glenn who did it. | 0:41:35 | 0:41:37 | |
No, I did not say that Glenn Cullen did it. | 0:41:37 | 0:41:40 | |
No, I, when I, I meant that Glenn told you, not that, | 0:41:40 | 0:41:44 | |
that I meant that Glenn did it. | 0:41:44 | 0:41:47 | |
To return for the moment to the subject of bullying, | 0:41:47 | 0:41:50 | |
where did Malcolm Tucker stand in all this? | 0:41:50 | 0:41:52 | |
The department's a horrible place, and when Malcolm was there | 0:41:52 | 0:41:54 | |
he was part of that, you know, he was the big bully. | 0:41:54 | 0:41:58 | |
The other people are horribly rude, | 0:41:58 | 0:42:01 | |
and the rudeness is unnecessary, but, you know, | 0:42:01 | 0:42:03 | |
I don't get any sense that they've, they've got a big plan or anything. | 0:42:03 | 0:42:06 | |
You know, to be honest, | 0:42:06 | 0:42:08 | |
I think they're just trying to get through the day without | 0:42:08 | 0:42:10 | |
cocking up, and drink as many hot drinks as possible in the process. | 0:42:10 | 0:42:14 | |
Moving on, do you know anything about Malcolm Tucker's | 0:42:14 | 0:42:17 | |
involvement with data smuggling? Specifically private NHS details. | 0:42:17 | 0:42:21 | |
I think... | 0:42:21 | 0:42:23 | |
Er, no, no, I'm afraid we don't. | 0:42:23 | 0:42:26 | |
I don't. Um, would it be possible for me to revise my, | 0:42:26 | 0:42:28 | |
the opinion that I gave of Malcolm Tucker on my first appearance? | 0:42:28 | 0:42:32 | |
Your Lordship? Yes? | 0:42:32 | 0:42:33 | |
You may revise it, but of course it will stay on the record. | 0:42:33 | 0:42:36 | |
OK, um, well, I just wanted to make it absolutely clear that | 0:42:36 | 0:42:39 | |
having thought about it in the grand scheme of things, | 0:42:39 | 0:42:41 | |
I don't think it is fair to say that Malcolm is a bully or he's brutal. | 0:42:41 | 0:42:46 | |
Certainly not when you compare him to some of his fellow countrymen. | 0:42:46 | 0:42:49 | |
Well, I think Malcolm's really difficult, and you do too, Terri. | 0:42:49 | 0:42:52 | |
Don't know why you're being so coy. It's not like he'll do a...you know. | 0:42:52 | 0:42:56 | |
A you know? What's, what's this? | 0:42:56 | 0:42:58 | |
You know, that story about you in the papers. | 0:42:58 | 0:43:01 | |
A story involving me in the newspapers is not the subject | 0:43:01 | 0:43:05 | |
of this investigation, so we are not going to discuss it any further. | 0:43:05 | 0:43:09 | |
Now, er, Miss Murdoch, what about the use of data smuggling, | 0:43:09 | 0:43:12 | |
er, within government? | 0:43:12 | 0:43:15 | |
Do you know anything about that? | 0:43:15 | 0:43:17 | |
Yeah, loads. Um, there are dodgy people in the NHS | 0:43:17 | 0:43:21 | |
and the benefits office who talk to investigators all the time. | 0:43:21 | 0:43:26 | |
-Do you have experience of this? -Yeah, I've been on the receiving end of it. | 0:43:27 | 0:43:30 | |
I didn't know that the notes your GP makes are available | 0:43:32 | 0:43:36 | |
to your local pharmacist. | 0:43:36 | 0:43:39 | |
I went to see my mother's doctor about her alcohol problem, | 0:43:39 | 0:43:43 | |
which is a private family matter. | 0:43:43 | 0:43:45 | |
Next thing I knew, it's all round the village. | 0:43:45 | 0:43:47 | |
Yes. And now it's all round the world. | 0:43:47 | 0:43:50 | |
Exactly. | 0:43:50 | 0:43:51 | |
She's saying that that's your fault. | 0:43:53 | 0:43:55 | |
How? | 0:43:55 | 0:43:56 | |
Oh. | 0:43:59 | 0:44:00 | |
As you can see, Baroness Sureka is not with us | 0:44:00 | 0:44:02 | |
and will remain absent while she deals with the personal allegations | 0:44:02 | 0:44:06 | |
published in the Sunday Times. | 0:44:06 | 0:44:08 | |
This in no way invalidates the inquiry, nor does it compromise | 0:44:08 | 0:44:11 | |
the integrity of any questioning conducted by Baroness Sureka. | 0:44:11 | 0:44:15 | |
Mr Hodge. | 0:44:15 | 0:44:17 | |
Thank you. | 0:44:18 | 0:44:19 | |
Er, Oliver Reeder, you were a senior advisor to Nicola Murray | 0:44:19 | 0:44:22 | |
during her time as Secretary of State at DoSAC. | 0:44:22 | 0:44:25 | |
Yup. I was, er, the senior advisor. | 0:44:25 | 0:44:29 | |
Good, and when Ms Murray became Leader of the Opposition, | 0:44:29 | 0:44:32 | |
er, you were also one of her senior advisors? | 0:44:32 | 0:44:34 | |
Yeah. Again, the, the senior advisor, yeah. | 0:44:34 | 0:44:36 | |
I see, and now you're a senior advisor to Mr Dan Miller? | 0:44:36 | 0:44:40 | |
Yeah, yeah, slight, a slightly less pivotal role with, with Dan, | 0:44:40 | 0:44:43 | |
but part of a, kind of, larger pivot, really. | 0:44:43 | 0:44:45 | |
Mm-hmm, thank you. Er, well, Mr Reeder, | 0:44:45 | 0:44:48 | |
they say that in politics knowledge is power. | 0:44:48 | 0:44:50 | |
True, yes, although that doesn't mean that Carol Vorderman | 0:44:50 | 0:44:52 | |
should be Prime Minister! | 0:44:52 | 0:44:54 | |
Or should I say Stephen Fry, cos Carol's just maths, but yeah. | 0:44:55 | 0:44:59 | |
You've known Malcolm Tucker for, for some years now. | 0:45:00 | 0:45:04 | |
Yes, I have, yes. | 0:45:04 | 0:45:05 | |
He seems like a, an intimidating person. Is he? | 0:45:06 | 0:45:10 | |
Er, well, I mean not, not to me. | 0:45:10 | 0:45:12 | |
No? | 0:45:12 | 0:45:13 | |
No, er, no, er, no, although he doesn't, | 0:45:13 | 0:45:16 | |
he doesn't suffer fools gladly, I think that's fair to say, | 0:45:16 | 0:45:19 | |
or, um, or clever people, to be honest. | 0:45:19 | 0:45:21 | |
So he's never, er, bullied you? | 0:45:21 | 0:45:23 | |
Well, do I, do I look like I could be bullied by Mr Tucker? | 0:45:23 | 0:45:27 | |
I could... No. | 0:45:27 | 0:45:28 | |
Could you turn to tab nine? | 0:45:29 | 0:45:32 | |
You'll find it in your, in your folder there, yeah. | 0:45:32 | 0:45:34 | |
Um, we have some, er, some quotes here. | 0:45:35 | 0:45:39 | |
Some evidence from several civil servants who, who all | 0:45:39 | 0:45:44 | |
independently suggest that Mr Tucker, in fact, regularly did bully you. | 0:45:44 | 0:45:51 | |
"Mr Tucker threatened to remove Mr Reeder's appendix, | 0:45:51 | 0:45:53 | |
"throw away Mr Reeder, | 0:45:53 | 0:45:56 | |
"and appoint the useless flap of colon as special advisor." | 0:45:56 | 0:45:59 | |
Yeah. | 0:45:59 | 0:46:01 | |
Um... Well that's, yes! | 0:46:01 | 0:46:04 | |
That's banter. | 0:46:04 | 0:46:06 | |
"Mr Tucker told Mr Reeder that he would have him smothered, | 0:46:06 | 0:46:09 | |
"eviscerated, stuff, fitted with wheels, and donated to an orphanage." | 0:46:09 | 0:46:13 | |
That's, what... cos this is out of context, | 0:46:13 | 0:46:15 | |
what you don't have there is my reply. | 0:46:15 | 0:46:17 | |
-And so, you know, it's just him. -And what was that? | 0:46:17 | 0:46:19 | |
Er, well, I don't remember what it was on this occasion. | 0:46:19 | 0:46:22 | |
It would have been, but it would have been a, you know, kkk! | 0:46:22 | 0:46:24 | |
It would have been a zinger, because I gave as good as I got, | 0:46:24 | 0:46:27 | |
-so it's not bullying. -Very good. | 0:46:27 | 0:46:29 | |
Is there anything about the leaking of the so-called PFI e-mail | 0:46:29 | 0:46:32 | |
that you feel that this inquiry should, should be aware of? | 0:46:32 | 0:46:35 | |
Oh, God, um... | 0:46:35 | 0:46:37 | |
I mean, um... | 0:46:38 | 0:46:40 | |
I mean, to be brutally frank, | 0:46:41 | 0:46:42 | |
I'm, I'm struggling to remember here, but... | 0:46:42 | 0:46:44 | |
Well, please take your time. There's no hurry. | 0:46:44 | 0:46:46 | |
Of course, yeah, I mean I think, you know, what, | 0:46:46 | 0:46:49 | |
what you have to remember, in this instance, is that on the day | 0:46:49 | 0:46:52 | |
that all of that stuff took place, um, I was in hospital. | 0:46:52 | 0:46:56 | |
So I'm, you know, I'm cut off, essentially, I didn't have a phone. | 0:46:56 | 0:46:59 | |
But I mean, I hadn't mentioned, er, the use of a phone, I mean... | 0:46:59 | 0:47:02 | |
Yes, no, I know, I'm simply saying I was... | 0:47:02 | 0:47:04 | |
You weren't working remotely from the hospital? | 0:47:04 | 0:47:07 | |
No, no, not remotely, um, er, in, in either sense. No. No. | 0:47:07 | 0:47:10 | |
Did you have any visitors? | 0:47:10 | 0:47:12 | |
Erm... | 0:47:12 | 0:47:13 | |
You must be able to remember that. | 0:47:15 | 0:47:17 | |
Well, if you're not completely sure, Mr Reeder, | 0:47:18 | 0:47:20 | |
you can always check with the visitors' records. | 0:47:20 | 0:47:23 | |
Well, don't, let's not do that, um, let's not do that for the moment, | 0:47:23 | 0:47:27 | |
let me just, if, just give, bear with me, er, but I did, yes, | 0:47:27 | 0:47:33 | |
I think I was visited by colleagues from the office. | 0:47:33 | 0:47:37 | |
Can you give us a name? | 0:47:37 | 0:47:39 | |
Er, Malcolm is, um, is his name, Malcolm's name, | 0:47:41 | 0:47:46 | |
Malcolm, Malcolm Tucker visited me. | 0:47:46 | 0:47:48 | |
I'm assuming this wasn't a social visit, what did, er, | 0:47:48 | 0:47:51 | |
what did he, what did Mr Tucker want? | 0:47:51 | 0:47:54 | |
He wanted to, he, I mean, what, what, OK. | 0:47:54 | 0:47:57 | |
I mean, I'm really, I'm, I'm anxious, I'm keen, | 0:47:59 | 0:48:02 | |
I'm trying my best to answer your, er, questions truthfully... | 0:48:02 | 0:48:05 | |
I should remind you you are under oath, Mr... | 0:48:05 | 0:48:07 | |
Absolutely, yes, I'm under oath, so this is... but, but, er... | 0:48:07 | 0:48:11 | |
What you have to understand is, | 0:48:12 | 0:48:14 | |
everybody has something on everyone here, right? | 0:48:14 | 0:48:17 | |
So in this circumstance, if you inadvertently say or do something, | 0:48:17 | 0:48:23 | |
um, er, you know, you shouldn't, then that's it, that's it, | 0:48:23 | 0:48:28 | |
that's it, it's done, your career is done. | 0:48:28 | 0:48:31 | |
You know, look what happened to a member of this inquiry, right? | 0:48:31 | 0:48:35 | |
So you have to... | 0:48:35 | 0:48:37 | |
-This is not the place to discuss those allegations. -No, of course. | 0:48:37 | 0:48:40 | |
-Mr Reeder, if you feel... -Yeah. | 0:48:40 | 0:48:41 | |
You feel under pressure, am I right? Is that because of something that you know? | 0:48:41 | 0:48:45 | |
Yes, no, er, general pressure, I feel under a, a sort of, | 0:48:45 | 0:48:49 | |
just that, it's the jitters of work. | 0:48:49 | 0:48:50 | |
Who leaked the e-mail, Mr Reeder? | 0:48:50 | 0:48:52 | |
Glenn, er, Cullen. | 0:48:52 | 0:48:54 | |
Er, he was in DoSAC at the time, | 0:48:54 | 0:48:56 | |
and he, er, still had access to the e-mail, and he hated his life, | 0:48:56 | 0:48:59 | |
he, he, you know, he hated Nicola Murray because she'd previously | 0:48:59 | 0:49:03 | |
destroyed his chances of standing as an MP. | 0:49:03 | 0:49:07 | |
Most helpful, Glenn Cullen is our next witness. | 0:49:07 | 0:49:09 | |
Most interesting, thank you. | 0:49:09 | 0:49:10 | |
-Oh, well, OK. -That's fine, thank you. | 0:49:10 | 0:49:12 | |
Mr Cullen. | 0:49:12 | 0:49:14 | |
I wonder if I could start by taking you back to that time two years ago. | 0:49:14 | 0:49:17 | |
You left Nicola Murray, and you went to work for Fergus Williams. | 0:49:17 | 0:49:21 | |
Yes, yes I did, that's right. | 0:49:21 | 0:49:22 | |
And you found yourself in a coalition with the very party | 0:49:22 | 0:49:26 | |
that you opposed. That must have been extremely distressing. | 0:49:26 | 0:49:29 | |
Er, no, not at all, as a matter of fact. I was very invigorated | 0:49:29 | 0:49:32 | |
by the idea of, er, trying to forge a new way in politics. | 0:49:32 | 0:49:36 | |
Mm-hmm, so all was rosy? | 0:49:36 | 0:49:38 | |
Well, um, can't think of any negatives. | 0:49:38 | 0:49:41 | |
No friction? | 0:49:41 | 0:49:43 | |
No, the only F word was fun. | 0:49:43 | 0:49:46 | |
Thank you, Mr Cullen. | 0:49:48 | 0:49:50 | |
Mr Cullen. | 0:49:50 | 0:49:51 | |
Would you say there's a culture of leaking in the government? | 0:49:51 | 0:49:55 | |
Yes, I would. Yes, leaking and lying. | 0:49:55 | 0:49:58 | |
To your knowledge have any of your colleagues lied to this inquiry? | 0:49:58 | 0:50:02 | |
Well, I mean, that's a bit like asking, you know, um, | 0:50:02 | 0:50:05 | |
does a cow drink milk? | 0:50:05 | 0:50:06 | |
Does it? | 0:50:06 | 0:50:08 | |
Probably. | 0:50:08 | 0:50:10 | |
But what I meant to say was, er, yes, | 0:50:10 | 0:50:13 | |
um, my colleagues lie constantly, it's a professional necessity. | 0:50:13 | 0:50:18 | |
Have you ever leaked, Mr Cullen? | 0:50:19 | 0:50:21 | |
First of all, may I just say, er, welcome back, Baroness Sureka, | 0:50:21 | 0:50:25 | |
big hugs, I'm sure I speak to everyone here | 0:50:25 | 0:50:28 | |
when I say that we're all thinking of you, er, and, er, you have been... | 0:50:28 | 0:50:32 | |
I'd rather you, um, swapped the ham-fisted flattery for actually | 0:50:32 | 0:50:36 | |
answering my question, which was have you ever leaked? | 0:50:36 | 0:50:39 | |
Right. No, it's a very simple question | 0:50:39 | 0:50:41 | |
and it's got a very simple answer. No, I haven't. | 0:50:41 | 0:50:44 | |
Um, you'll be aware of Ollie Reeder's testimony to the inquiry | 0:50:44 | 0:50:47 | |
where he said that you were, in fact, responsible for the PFI leak. | 0:50:47 | 0:50:50 | |
Yes, I am. | 0:50:50 | 0:50:51 | |
But, no, which means to say I am aware of, of that. | 0:50:53 | 0:50:56 | |
But, gosh, you've got to be careful what you say here, haven't you? | 0:50:56 | 0:51:00 | |
You certainly do, Mr Cullen. Let's hope we're up to it. | 0:51:00 | 0:51:03 | |
Is there any truth at all in Mr Reeder's accusations? | 0:51:03 | 0:51:05 | |
Absolutely none whatsoever. | 0:51:05 | 0:51:06 | |
He's talking out of his... out of his other cheeks, if you... | 0:51:06 | 0:51:11 | |
Why would Oliver Reeder suggest that you were behind | 0:51:11 | 0:51:13 | |
the PFI e-mail leak, then? | 0:51:13 | 0:51:15 | |
I've absolutely no idea. | 0:51:15 | 0:51:16 | |
It's very difficult for me to get into the mindset of somebody | 0:51:16 | 0:51:20 | |
so entirely self-serving and, um, spiritually ugly. | 0:51:20 | 0:51:26 | |
I mean, anyone who's been unfortunate enough to have come across | 0:51:26 | 0:51:29 | |
Ollie Reeder will know that he is a genuinely... | 0:51:29 | 0:51:32 | |
atrocious person. | 0:51:33 | 0:51:36 | |
Mmm. Do you believe Mr Reeder was trying to cover himself in that case? | 0:51:36 | 0:51:39 | |
Well, I do believe he has the emotional tools for the task. Yes, certainly. | 0:51:39 | 0:51:42 | |
Do you believe that Ollie Reeder was behind the leak? | 0:51:42 | 0:51:45 | |
No. | 0:51:46 | 0:51:48 | |
You see... | 0:51:48 | 0:51:50 | |
A leak of this magnitude would require | 0:51:51 | 0:51:56 | |
one essential item that Ollie lacks. | 0:51:56 | 0:51:59 | |
And that's a spine. | 0:51:59 | 0:52:01 | |
He is a man without a spine, he is a man worm, | 0:52:01 | 0:52:05 | |
he's a writhing mollusc without any strategies or convictions, | 0:52:05 | 0:52:09 | |
he simply slimes his way into the nearest crack every night, | 0:52:09 | 0:52:14 | |
and I would like to put on record that I apologise to this committee | 0:52:14 | 0:52:17 | |
for being the man who brought him into the world of politics. | 0:52:17 | 0:52:21 | |
..the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. | 0:52:21 | 0:52:24 | |
Thank you for returning to this inquiry, Mr Tucker. | 0:52:24 | 0:52:26 | |
That's no problem, no. | 0:52:26 | 0:52:28 | |
I had a hair appointment, but I think they can fit me in next week. | 0:52:28 | 0:52:31 | |
There's no need to be so flippant about this inquiry. | 0:52:31 | 0:52:33 | |
Well, it's just, you know, you keep asking me the same questions, | 0:52:33 | 0:52:36 | |
I can't really help it if you don't like the answers. | 0:52:36 | 0:52:39 | |
Maybe you could try a little harder in answering. | 0:52:39 | 0:52:41 | |
I'm amazed you've stayed at the top of politics for, for quite | 0:52:41 | 0:52:44 | |
so long with such apparently poor powers of recall. | 0:52:44 | 0:52:47 | |
Maybe it's my age. It's good to see you back. | 0:52:47 | 0:52:49 | |
Thank you. Nice to see you too. | 0:52:49 | 0:52:51 | |
At your last appearance at this inquiry, | 0:52:52 | 0:52:54 | |
you admitted that you have leaked. Is that correct? | 0:52:54 | 0:52:57 | |
Well, everyone leaks. Many, many people who appeared here in | 0:52:57 | 0:53:00 | |
front of you, er, have leaked, but they've just lied about it to you. | 0:53:00 | 0:53:04 | |
Mr Tucker, that's an incredibly serious charge, | 0:53:04 | 0:53:08 | |
do you have any evidence to substantiate that allegation? | 0:53:08 | 0:53:11 | |
Well, you will forgive me if I don't do your job for you. | 0:53:11 | 0:53:13 | |
Because if you can't spot a sprayed-on halo | 0:53:13 | 0:53:16 | |
while someone doing a, you know, "What me, guv?" panto act, | 0:53:16 | 0:53:19 | |
maybe you shouldn't be sitting behind that desk. | 0:53:19 | 0:53:22 | |
At your last appearance we asked you very specifically | 0:53:22 | 0:53:25 | |
how you came by Mr Tickel's NHS number and National Insurance number, | 0:53:25 | 0:53:30 | |
and you could not recall. | 0:53:30 | 0:53:32 | |
Have you had any more time to think about it? | 0:53:32 | 0:53:34 | |
Yes, I have. | 0:53:34 | 0:53:36 | |
And could you tell us any more? | 0:53:36 | 0:53:37 | |
No. | 0:53:37 | 0:53:39 | |
You've got no recollection at all? | 0:53:39 | 0:53:41 | |
No. By the way, you should not be talking to me about this, | 0:53:41 | 0:53:44 | |
because you've been a victim of a leaking, | 0:53:44 | 0:53:46 | |
a very unfortunate victim, and I have every sympathy with you. | 0:53:46 | 0:53:49 | |
How can you possibly give me a fair hearing when you've been | 0:53:49 | 0:53:52 | |
a victim of the very crime that you are accusing me of? | 0:53:52 | 0:53:54 | |
You are prejudiced, this entire inquiry, therefore, is prejudiced. | 0:53:54 | 0:54:00 | |
I can see what you're doing. | 0:54:01 | 0:54:03 | |
It smacks of desperation and it will not work. | 0:54:03 | 0:54:05 | |
Does it? | 0:54:05 | 0:54:07 | |
No, listen, there you go again, see that's it, | 0:54:07 | 0:54:09 | |
you're just rushing to judgement. | 0:54:09 | 0:54:10 | |
You are totally discredited here. | 0:54:10 | 0:54:12 | |
I am obliged to remind you, Mr Tucker, that you are under oath, | 0:54:12 | 0:54:17 | |
and if you lie to this inquiry, it may result in a criminal prosecution. | 0:54:17 | 0:54:22 | |
Sorry, please don't insult my intelligence by acting as if | 0:54:22 | 0:54:28 | |
you're all so naive that you don't know how this all works. | 0:54:28 | 0:54:31 | |
Everybody in this room has bent the rules to get in here, | 0:54:31 | 0:54:37 | |
because you don't get in this room without bending the rules, | 0:54:37 | 0:54:41 | |
you don't get to where you are without bending the rules, | 0:54:41 | 0:54:44 | |
that's the way it is. | 0:54:44 | 0:54:46 | |
Mr Tucker, I'm going to give you one more chance | 0:54:46 | 0:54:49 | |
to respond to my question. | 0:54:49 | 0:54:51 | |
How did you acquire Mr Tickel's NHS number | 0:54:51 | 0:54:55 | |
and his National Insurance number? | 0:54:55 | 0:54:56 | |
Who said I acquired it? | 0:54:56 | 0:54:59 | |
A photograph. | 0:54:59 | 0:55:01 | |
No, no, the photograph shows me holding it. | 0:55:01 | 0:55:05 | |
Doesn't show me acquiring it. | 0:55:05 | 0:55:06 | |
You'd have to ask the person that gave me the folder. | 0:55:06 | 0:55:09 | |
-Who gave you the folder? -I don't remember. | 0:55:09 | 0:55:11 | |
You are being deliberately evasive. | 0:55:12 | 0:55:14 | |
I... | 0:55:20 | 0:55:21 | |
I don't... | 0:55:23 | 0:55:24 | |
recall, you know. I don't, I don't know, I can't remember. | 0:55:25 | 0:55:28 | |
Very well. | 0:55:28 | 0:55:29 | |
Regardless of how you came by Mr Tickel's mental health records, | 0:55:29 | 0:55:34 | |
did you then leak them to the media? | 0:55:34 | 0:55:37 | |
I can't recall. | 0:55:38 | 0:55:39 | |
So that's not a denial? | 0:55:41 | 0:55:44 | |
Je ne remember rien. | 0:55:46 | 0:55:47 | |
Well, if you can't recall, | 0:55:48 | 0:55:50 | |
it leaves open the possibility that you did leak them. | 0:55:50 | 0:55:53 | |
Let me tell you this. | 0:55:53 | 0:55:55 | |
The whole planet's leaking, everybody is leaking. | 0:55:55 | 0:55:58 | |
You know, everyone's spewing out their guts onto the internet. | 0:55:58 | 0:56:02 | |
Putting up their, their relationship status, | 0:56:02 | 0:56:05 | |
and, er, photos of their vajazzles. | 0:56:05 | 0:56:07 | |
We've come to a point where there are people, millions of people, | 0:56:07 | 0:56:11 | |
who are quite happy to trade a kidney in order to go on television. | 0:56:11 | 0:56:15 | |
And to show people their knickers, to show people their skid marks, | 0:56:15 | 0:56:18 | |
and then complain to OK Magazine about a breach of privacy. | 0:56:18 | 0:56:22 | |
The exchange of private information, that is what drives our economy. | 0:56:22 | 0:56:27 | |
But you come after me | 0:56:27 | 0:56:29 | |
because you can't, you can't arrest a land mass, can you? | 0:56:29 | 0:56:33 | |
You can't, you can't cuff a country. | 0:56:33 | 0:56:36 | |
You might as well just go and go, | 0:56:37 | 0:56:38 | |
you can't lynch that guy there, can you? | 0:56:38 | 0:56:42 | |
But you decide that you can sit there, you can judge, | 0:56:42 | 0:56:44 | |
and you can ogle me like a Page Three girl. | 0:56:44 | 0:56:46 | |
You don't like it? Well, you don't like yourself. | 0:56:46 | 0:56:50 | |
You don't like your species, and you know what? | 0:56:50 | 0:56:53 | |
Neither do I, but how dare you come and lay this at my door. | 0:56:53 | 0:56:56 | |
How dare you blame me for this. | 0:56:58 | 0:57:02 | |
Which is the result of a political class... | 0:57:04 | 0:57:07 | |
..which has given up on morality. | 0:57:08 | 0:57:10 | |
And simply pursues popularity at all costs. | 0:57:11 | 0:57:15 | |
I am you, and you are me. | 0:57:17 | 0:57:18 | |
Are you finished? | 0:57:21 | 0:57:23 | |
Ah, I'm finished anyway. | 0:57:23 | 0:57:25 | |
You didn't finish me. | 0:57:25 | 0:57:27 | |
Would you like to stand down? | 0:57:27 | 0:57:29 | |
Thanks. | 0:57:33 | 0:57:34 | |
Are you not the human router? | 0:57:37 | 0:57:39 | |
The human router, yes. | 0:57:39 | 0:57:40 | |
But I think you'll find that leaking is very much a 3G business. | 0:57:40 | 0:57:45 | |
You know? It's, it's off the house wi-fi grid. | 0:57:45 | 0:57:48 | |
I assume you're referring to the leaking of Mr Tickel's | 0:57:48 | 0:57:51 | |
medical records, and I would like to say, I find that disgraceful, | 0:57:51 | 0:57:54 | |
and I would like that on the record. | 0:57:54 | 0:57:56 | |
Everything we say here is on the record, | 0:57:56 | 0:57:58 | |
Mr Williams, that's how this works. | 0:57:58 | 0:58:00 | |
Well, that's great. | 0:58:00 | 0:58:01 | |
When I was a journalist, OK, when I, when I was a journalist at the Mail, I used leaks. | 0:58:01 | 0:58:06 | |
Now I'm in government, I do not leak. | 0:58:06 | 0:58:08 | |
Wayne Rooney, for example, he used to score goals for Everton. | 0:58:08 | 0:58:11 | |
And now he plays for, for Manchester United. | 0:58:11 | 0:58:13 | |
Now, nobody expects him to score goals for Everton any more, do they? | 0:58:13 | 0:58:16 | |
I mean, if he did that, United would give him the sack. | 0:58:16 | 0:58:20 | |
..although you did previously describe yourself as a shepherdess. | 0:58:20 | 0:58:23 | |
Now, did you have something to add to that? | 0:58:25 | 0:58:27 | |
I just, shepherdess, did she say, did you say shepherdess? | 0:58:27 | 0:58:31 | |
Yes, I was, I was giving an analogy, I mean to be, to be fair, | 0:58:31 | 0:58:33 | |
Perhaps it would be more accurate to describe myself | 0:58:33 | 0:58:36 | |
as a sheep in shepherdess's clothing. | 0:58:36 | 0:58:38 | |
Do you follow? | 0:58:38 | 0:58:40 | |
Err, no, not, not, er, completely. No. | 0:58:40 | 0:58:43 | |
The shepherdess analogy is flawed anyway. | 0:58:43 | 0:58:45 | |
Malcolm Tucker is very much a political Flintstone. You know. | 0:58:45 | 0:58:50 | |
He carved his press releases into stone tablets. | 0:58:50 | 0:58:53 | |
He uses a bird's beak to play his Happy Monday vinyls. He leaks. | 0:58:53 | 0:58:56 |