Browse content similar to The Big Bang Machine. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
13.7 billion years after it all began, | 0:00:10 | 0:00:15 | |
we're about to go back to the beginning of time. | 0:00:15 | 0:00:20 | |
'With the largest and most complex scientific experiment ever attempted. | 0:00:24 | 0:00:31 | |
'The Large Hadron Collider, or LHC, | 0:00:31 | 0:00:35 | |
'has just one simple but audacious aim - | 0:00:35 | 0:00:39 | |
'to recreate the conditions of the Big Bang... | 0:00:39 | 0:00:42 | |
'..in an attempt to answer the most profound questions about our universe.' | 0:00:44 | 0:00:50 | |
The goal of particle physics is to understand the universe in which we live. | 0:00:53 | 0:00:59 | |
We want to know why things are the way they are, how they work, what everything is... | 0:00:59 | 0:01:06 | |
we want to understand. | 0:01:06 | 0:01:08 | |
If you're going to go for the big questions then you have to go for it. | 0:01:10 | 0:01:15 | |
There is no point in sort of messing around if you really want to understand how the universe ticks. | 0:01:15 | 0:01:23 | |
The LHC is what you need. | 0:01:23 | 0:01:25 | |
When the switch is thrown, this could be either the beginning of the end, | 0:01:27 | 0:01:32 | |
when we find that our theories of what existed just after the Big Bang are right, | 0:01:32 | 0:01:36 | |
or it could be the end of the beginning where we discover that the universe is more mysterious | 0:01:38 | 0:01:45 | |
and more beautiful than we could possibly have imagined. | 0:01:45 | 0:01:50 | |
The Large Hadron Collider spans the French/Swiss border just outside Geneva. | 0:02:13 | 0:02:19 | |
It's the largest particle accelerator ever constructed. | 0:02:19 | 0:02:22 | |
I'm Brian Cox and I've been helping build it, | 0:02:26 | 0:02:30 | |
along with thousands of other scientists at CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research. | 0:02:30 | 0:02:38 | |
This is the experiment, if you like, Q1, Q2, Q3. | 0:02:41 | 0:02:44 | |
One of the scientists overseeing the launch | 0:02:47 | 0:02:50 | |
of the biggest experiment since NASA sent men to the moon is Paul Collier. | 0:02:50 | 0:02:56 | |
It's going to be a like a moon shot where you see CAPCOM - "Go, go!" | 0:02:56 | 0:03:00 | |
-There's going to be a bank of experts saying, "Mind it's all right." -Probably yes. | 0:03:00 | 0:03:06 | |
You must get asked this all the time. Is there a button? Who's going to press it? | 0:03:06 | 0:03:10 | |
There is not at the moment a button, but I'm considering buying one, | 0:03:10 | 0:03:14 | |
but the LHC is not like... it's not like a rocket. | 0:03:14 | 0:03:17 | |
There will not be a countdown, there will not be a button to press. | 0:03:17 | 0:03:21 | |
Unfortunately, the buttons we have are all computer sequences | 0:03:21 | 0:03:26 | |
which we have to go through to prepare the machine. | 0:03:26 | 0:03:29 | |
In a few days, it'll be standing room only | 0:03:29 | 0:03:32 | |
as the world's most eminent particle physicists | 0:03:32 | 0:03:36 | |
gather to watch this remarkable machine spring to life. | 0:03:36 | 0:03:41 | |
What's the scene going to be like on the day that the first beam goes around LHC? | 0:03:41 | 0:03:47 | |
What's it going to feel like in this control room? | 0:03:47 | 0:03:50 | |
Yeah, it's going to be an interesting time and quite exciting. | 0:03:50 | 0:03:52 | |
The first thing I should say is there will be two people on duty here, | 0:03:52 | 0:03:57 | |
one physicist and one technical engineer, | 0:03:57 | 0:04:00 | |
so, if you like, two people will be doing the work, and then probably 200 people will be watching them work. | 0:04:00 | 0:04:06 | |
And of course we will have to... we will have to keep control of that. | 0:04:06 | 0:04:10 | |
It's brilliant, actually, it's fascinating. | 0:04:10 | 0:04:12 | |
All of us who work at CERN hope that this will become the world's most renowned Big Bang laboratory. | 0:04:12 | 0:04:19 | |
That here we'll discover something so fundamental that it will change our understanding of the cosmos. | 0:04:22 | 0:04:29 | |
Because right now even the brightest minds and the best theories | 0:04:32 | 0:04:36 | |
all fall short of explaining what occurred as the universe burst into existence. | 0:04:36 | 0:04:43 | |
Physics is stuck and the only thing left to do is recreate the universe | 0:04:44 | 0:04:50 | |
as it was a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, and that's what the LHC's designed to do, | 0:04:50 | 0:04:56 | |
to smash bits of matter together at energies never before achieved | 0:04:56 | 0:05:01 | |
so we can stare at the face of creation. | 0:05:01 | 0:05:05 | |
Every civilisation has its own creation story. | 0:05:11 | 0:05:16 | |
The ancient Chinese, Indian mystics and Christian theologians | 0:05:20 | 0:05:24 | |
all place a divine creator at the heart of their creation stories. | 0:05:24 | 0:05:29 | |
Science too has an elaborate story that describes the universe's genesis. | 0:05:30 | 0:05:36 | |
It tells us how the fundamental constituents of the cosmos took on their form. | 0:05:38 | 0:05:44 | |
The difference with this story is that we can test it. | 0:05:46 | 0:05:51 | |
We can find out if it's true by tearing matter apart and looking at the pieces. | 0:05:51 | 0:05:57 | |
All you need is a machine powerful enough to restage the first moments after creation. | 0:05:58 | 0:06:05 | |
In the beginning there was nothing. | 0:06:11 | 0:06:15 | |
No space, no time, just endless nothing. | 0:06:15 | 0:06:21 | |
Then, 13.7 billion years ago, from nothing... | 0:06:24 | 0:06:29 | |
..came everything. | 0:06:35 | 0:06:37 | |
The universe exploded into existence. | 0:06:40 | 0:06:43 | |
From that fireball of energy emerged the simplest building blocks of matter. | 0:06:47 | 0:06:53 | |
Finding experimental evidence of these fundamental entities has become the holy grail of physics. | 0:07:02 | 0:07:09 | |
Well, the universe is an object that is not stable. | 0:07:11 | 0:07:16 | |
It is expanding and cooling, it's doing things. | 0:07:16 | 0:07:19 | |
It was therefore different in the past and will be in the future. | 0:07:19 | 0:07:24 | |
It has a history, it has a life, it has an evolution. | 0:07:24 | 0:07:27 | |
As the early universe grew, its mysterious primeval constituents | 0:07:29 | 0:07:34 | |
transformed themselves into atoms, then molecules and eventually stars and planets. | 0:07:34 | 0:07:42 | |
Now, billions of years on from the Big Bang, the universe is so complex | 0:07:42 | 0:07:46 | |
that all traces of the enigmatic building blocks are lost. | 0:07:46 | 0:07:50 | |
Understanding the evolution of the universe requires understanding what it is made of. | 0:07:53 | 0:07:59 | |
As it turns out, most of that of which the universe is made | 0:08:00 | 0:08:05 | |
are things that we do not understand at all. | 0:08:05 | 0:08:08 | |
But we hope that the LHC is about to bridge this profound gap in our knowledge | 0:08:08 | 0:08:14 | |
by peering further back in time than ever before. | 0:08:14 | 0:08:18 | |
The LHC is truly colossal. | 0:08:22 | 0:08:26 | |
Its accelerator ring is 27 kilometres long, | 0:08:26 | 0:08:30 | |
big enough to encircle a small city. | 0:08:30 | 0:08:34 | |
And around it we've built four enormous experiments | 0:08:34 | 0:08:38 | |
that will investigate the Big Bang in exquisite new detail. | 0:08:38 | 0:08:43 | |
This is my experiment, the experiment that I work on, Atlas, | 0:08:45 | 0:08:50 | |
and what you can see is just the surface buildings. | 0:08:50 | 0:08:54 | |
The experiment is actually 100 metres below the ground which is where the LHC is, | 0:08:54 | 0:08:58 | |
and basically this is just a building that covers cranes where we winch everything down. | 0:08:58 | 0:09:05 | |
And it's pretty much the last time | 0:09:06 | 0:09:09 | |
that not only TV crews, but me and the people who built it will be able to go down | 0:09:09 | 0:09:17 | |
because once it starts operating, the whole area becomes a radiation area, it becomes mildly radioactive. | 0:09:17 | 0:09:24 | |
You've always got to be worried when you see those things. | 0:09:26 | 0:09:29 | |
One of the most expensive bits of Atlas, if not the most, was digging the cavern. | 0:09:34 | 0:09:38 | |
We even have iris scanners, so a little bit of science fiction. | 0:09:43 | 0:09:48 | |
It's down here in caverns brimming with the latest technology that the Big Bangs will be made. | 0:09:51 | 0:09:57 | |
We just take little bits of matter, little bits of this stuff and accelerate them to as close | 0:10:02 | 0:10:09 | |
to the speed of light as we can get and then smash them together right in the middle of that detector | 0:10:09 | 0:10:16 | |
to recreate the conditions that were present back at the beginning of time. | 0:10:16 | 0:10:21 | |
The bits of matter we're going to fire around the LHC are called protons. | 0:10:26 | 0:10:31 | |
They come from a family of particles that give the collider its name, the Hadrons. | 0:10:31 | 0:10:38 | |
Protons are going to fly around here so close to the speed of light | 0:10:38 | 0:10:43 | |
that they go round this 27km tunnel 11,000 times a second. | 0:10:43 | 0:10:47 | |
The ring has two barrels that will shoot beams of protons around in opposite directions. | 0:10:49 | 0:10:55 | |
When they collide, they'll have the energy equivalent to an aircraft carrier steaming at 30 knots. | 0:10:58 | 0:11:04 | |
All this energy will be focused into a space just a fraction of the width of a human hair. | 0:11:07 | 0:11:13 | |
The resulting explosion will be so intense that no-one's quite sure what will happen. | 0:11:18 | 0:11:24 | |
This machine really is a leap into the unknown. | 0:11:27 | 0:11:30 | |
I mean it's often said with scientific experiments but I think in this case it's absolutely right. | 0:11:30 | 0:11:35 | |
We're, we're a step, something like a factor of ten in energy so it's a huge jump up in energy. | 0:11:35 | 0:11:43 | |
It's a huge jump up in the number of times we can smash particles together per second. | 0:11:43 | 0:11:47 | |
It collides protons together so often that your chances of seeing something incredibly interesting | 0:11:47 | 0:11:54 | |
and profound are increased way beyond anything that we've had before | 0:11:54 | 0:11:59 | |
and I can think of no better place to be actually at the moment. | 0:11:59 | 0:12:03 | |
This is exciting. | 0:12:03 | 0:12:05 | |
The dream of understanding the building blocks from which the universe is constructed | 0:12:17 | 0:12:21 | |
has inspired the greatest minds for over two millennia. | 0:12:21 | 0:12:25 | |
People have wanted to understand the universe and the stuff around them | 0:12:28 | 0:12:34 | |
ever since they began to think about it. | 0:12:34 | 0:12:36 | |
People have always been making theories about what matter is made of. | 0:12:39 | 0:12:43 | |
But the universe like everybody else is made of little pieces which | 0:12:44 | 0:12:48 | |
need to be understood in order to understand how the universe works. | 0:12:48 | 0:12:51 | |
The earliest reference to this concept of the world being made up | 0:12:53 | 0:12:57 | |
of tiny indivisible pieces dates back to ancient India in the sixth century BC. | 0:12:57 | 0:13:03 | |
Two centuries on, the ancient Greeks were the first to call these pieces, atoms, which means uncuttable. | 0:13:05 | 0:13:13 | |
But incredibly it was only in the early 20th century that the concept of the solid atom was shattered... | 0:13:13 | 0:13:21 | |
..and the modern version of atomic theory was born. | 0:13:23 | 0:13:26 | |
This new theory described the atom as being made up of a number of even smaller pieces. | 0:13:28 | 0:13:34 | |
Around the particles which form the nucleus of the atom, | 0:13:35 | 0:13:39 | |
other electrically charged particles called electrons constantly revolve like planets around the sun. | 0:13:39 | 0:13:46 | |
This new sub-atomic theory inspired the great experimental physicist | 0:13:47 | 0:13:51 | |
Ernest Rutherford to invent the art of particle colliding. | 0:13:51 | 0:13:56 | |
And ever since, we've peeled away the atomic layers. | 0:14:01 | 0:14:04 | |
Far from being uncuttable, the atom appeared to be more and more like a Russian doll. | 0:14:06 | 0:14:12 | |
Today particle physicists are busy dreaming up ever more elaborate ways | 0:14:24 | 0:14:29 | |
to torture matter. | 0:14:29 | 0:14:32 | |
It almost seems like a paradox that the smaller the thing you are looking for, | 0:14:32 | 0:14:38 | |
the bigger the instrument you need. | 0:14:38 | 0:14:40 | |
This is Fermilab and I used to work here for three years. | 0:14:44 | 0:14:48 | |
It's a beautiful piece of midwestern prairie. | 0:14:48 | 0:14:52 | |
The reason I worked here is because over there | 0:14:54 | 0:14:56 | |
is the biggest particle accelerator that's operating in the world today. | 0:14:56 | 0:15:00 | |
'I served my apprenticeship on a machine here called the Tevatron.' | 0:15:02 | 0:15:06 | |
Under that lake there, there's a tube that carries a beam of protons one way | 0:15:08 | 0:15:12 | |
and anti-matter protons the other way and we accelerate them round 50,000 times a second. | 0:15:12 | 0:15:18 | |
Imagine that! | 0:15:18 | 0:15:19 | |
It's as close to the speed of light as we can get and then we smash them together, two places actually, | 0:15:19 | 0:15:25 | |
that red building there, which is called CDF and that blue building over there which is called D zero. | 0:15:25 | 0:15:30 | |
And their job is to just simply take a picture of those collisions. | 0:15:30 | 0:15:33 | |
Fermilab has been colliding particles for over 40 years. | 0:15:38 | 0:15:41 | |
Probing the atom's secrets. | 0:15:44 | 0:15:47 | |
Leading the way into this sub-atomic frontier was the renowned particle hunter, Leon Lederman. | 0:15:53 | 0:15:59 | |
We didn't know anything about these particles. | 0:16:06 | 0:16:08 | |
We knew about atoms, but we had no idea of the complexity of matter. | 0:16:08 | 0:16:12 | |
What puzzled Lederman was that the more they looked inside the atom, | 0:16:16 | 0:16:20 | |
the more fundamental particles they found. | 0:16:20 | 0:16:23 | |
The moment of discovery is really a series of moments. | 0:16:25 | 0:16:29 | |
The experiment has worked. | 0:16:29 | 0:16:31 | |
We think it's OK, and then finally, "Hey, look at that, there's an event!" | 0:16:31 | 0:16:35 | |
Eventually get enough data to say we're beginning to see a class of particles... | 0:16:39 | 0:16:46 | |
that must have a very important role in the evolution of the universe. | 0:16:46 | 0:16:50 | |
Because of the work of Lederman and other pioneers, scores of particles completely new to science emerged. | 0:16:52 | 0:17:00 | |
The up quark, the down quark, | 0:17:04 | 0:17:07 | |
the electron, the electron neutrino, | 0:17:07 | 0:17:09 | |
the W-plus and the W-minus. | 0:17:09 | 0:17:13 | |
As scientists made their discoveries they began to name these fundamental particles. | 0:17:13 | 0:17:19 | |
The charm quark, the strange quark, the muon, the mu neutrino. | 0:17:19 | 0:17:24 | |
With these building blocks they came to a remarkable understanding of the world. | 0:17:25 | 0:17:31 | |
The top quark, the bottom quark, | 0:17:31 | 0:17:33 | |
the tao and the tao neutrino, | 0:17:33 | 0:17:36 | |
the Z particle and the photon. | 0:17:36 | 0:17:38 | |
Now they could explain what anything and everything is made of. | 0:17:40 | 0:17:45 | |
That's the Standard Model... Oh, no! The gluon, mustn't forget the gluon. | 0:17:46 | 0:17:53 | |
The Standard Model has gone on to become the basis for all modern particle physics. | 0:17:59 | 0:18:05 | |
So this was a model that was developed in the 1960s. | 0:18:05 | 0:18:10 | |
The first experimental breakthroughs | 0:18:10 | 0:18:14 | |
showing that it might be true came in the 1970s and I would say, | 0:18:14 | 0:18:20 | |
was really established by experiments at CERN in the 1980s and the 1990s. | 0:18:20 | 0:18:25 | |
Experimental science has shown that the nature of matter is more complex than anyone had foreseen. | 0:18:26 | 0:18:32 | |
Rather than a single atom, it turns out that nature uses 16 different fundamental particles | 0:18:35 | 0:18:42 | |
to make everything we see in the cosmos. | 0:18:42 | 0:18:45 | |
The Standard Model itself is a triumph. We have not only | 0:18:47 | 0:18:53 | |
the particles but the mathematics that gives a huge coherence | 0:18:53 | 0:19:00 | |
to our world on the microscopic level. | 0:19:00 | 0:19:04 | |
The Standard Model accurately describes the essential constituents of the universe. | 0:19:14 | 0:19:19 | |
It's no exaggeration to say it's one of the most successful theories in the history of science. | 0:19:21 | 0:19:27 | |
And yet many physicists feel uneasy about the Standard Model. | 0:19:33 | 0:19:37 | |
The maths is too complex, even ugly. | 0:19:41 | 0:19:45 | |
When scientists talk about beauty in a physical theory, they mean that | 0:19:49 | 0:19:54 | |
it can describe a whole range of diverse phenomena with hopefully simple concepts and simple maths. | 0:19:54 | 0:20:04 | |
Take Einstein's theory of general relativity, | 0:20:04 | 0:20:07 | |
our theory of gravitation, you can write it down in one line. | 0:20:07 | 0:20:11 | |
Now the trouble with the Standard Model is, | 0:20:19 | 0:20:21 | |
well, it takes pages to write down but also there are elements in it that are mysterious, arbitrary even. | 0:20:21 | 0:20:30 | |
There's something spooky about this Standard Model. | 0:20:44 | 0:20:49 | |
It doesn't really work, so we know that there is something sick in our theory. | 0:20:49 | 0:20:53 | |
For example, we have at the moment what we call a Standard Model of particle physics, works great. | 0:20:55 | 0:21:02 | |
Only one small problem, if you write down the equations of this model | 0:21:02 | 0:21:07 | |
it would seem to suggest that no particles would have any mass. | 0:21:07 | 0:21:11 | |
Clearly that's not true. | 0:21:11 | 0:21:12 | |
For all its power, the Standard Model overlooked | 0:21:18 | 0:21:22 | |
one of the most basic fundamental properties of our world. | 0:21:22 | 0:21:26 | |
It was incomplete in its description of the universe. | 0:21:27 | 0:21:30 | |
What's missing is an explanation, a mechanism for how the fundamental particles acquire mass. | 0:21:38 | 0:21:46 | |
Now we know intuitively that the things in the world around us have mass. | 0:21:46 | 0:21:52 | |
We can feel it. | 0:21:53 | 0:21:54 | |
It's... Well, it's what makes stuff, stuff. | 0:21:54 | 0:21:59 | |
But what is mass and why does it exist? | 0:21:59 | 0:22:04 | |
Sounds simple but it's become one of the most difficult and challenging problems in physics. | 0:22:04 | 0:22:11 | |
There must have been a time in the early universe | 0:22:18 | 0:22:22 | |
when the particles became substantial and took on their mass. | 0:22:22 | 0:22:26 | |
The best theory we have to explain how this happened was dreamt up one day | 0:22:31 | 0:22:36 | |
by a British physicist Peter Higgs, whilst walking in the Scottish Highlands. | 0:22:36 | 0:22:41 | |
He came up with a theoretical mechanism that could explain | 0:22:44 | 0:22:49 | |
how some but not all particles attain mass. | 0:22:49 | 0:22:53 | |
The Higgs mechanism works by filling the universe with a field, the Higgs field, | 0:22:55 | 0:23:00 | |
and by the universe I don't just mean up there amongst the stars. | 0:23:00 | 0:23:05 | |
I mean here in front of me, and inside of me, and particles | 0:23:05 | 0:23:09 | |
acquire mass by interacting with the Higgs Field, by talking to it. | 0:23:09 | 0:23:15 | |
The theory is that every particle in the universe is traversing this invisible Higgs Field | 0:23:18 | 0:23:24 | |
and some particles like the quarks and electrons acquire mass as they pass through. | 0:23:24 | 0:23:30 | |
Whereas mass-less particles, particles like photons, | 0:23:33 | 0:23:37 | |
don't interact with the Higgs Field and they just pass through the universe at the speed of light. | 0:23:37 | 0:23:43 | |
The Higgs brings simplicity and beauty to a nature which looks too complicated. | 0:23:53 | 0:23:59 | |
It introduces a kind of symmetry and a kind of beauty to nature which gives us an understanding of | 0:24:01 | 0:24:08 | |
one of the most puzzling features of this little model I told you about, the Standard Model. | 0:24:08 | 0:24:13 | |
The Higgs Field may solve the problem of missing mass in the Standard Model | 0:24:14 | 0:24:19 | |
but the only trouble is we haven't been able to detect it yet. | 0:24:19 | 0:24:23 | |
But there is hope, because it's a law of quantum physics | 0:24:25 | 0:24:29 | |
that all fields must have an associated particle. | 0:24:29 | 0:24:33 | |
And it's a key prediction of this Higgs theory that there should be a quantum of this field, a particle | 0:24:35 | 0:24:42 | |
associated with it and that's what's called the Higgs boson. | 0:24:42 | 0:24:45 | |
Is there a Higgs particle, and if there is, how does it appear? | 0:24:45 | 0:24:50 | |
How does it come about to simplify our view of the world? | 0:24:50 | 0:24:53 | |
It would be a tremendous discovery. | 0:24:53 | 0:24:56 | |
If we can find this new fundamental particle, the Higgs boson, | 0:24:57 | 0:25:02 | |
then we'll be one step closer to understanding how the universe came to be the way it is. | 0:25:02 | 0:25:07 | |
No wonder Lederman called it the God particle. | 0:25:07 | 0:25:12 | |
The Higgs mechanism is our best attempt to repair the Standard Model | 0:25:12 | 0:25:18 | |
but over 40 years after it was first thought of, | 0:25:18 | 0:25:22 | |
the Higgs particle, the one thing that could prove the theory correct hasn't been found. | 0:25:22 | 0:25:28 | |
EXPLOSION | 0:25:30 | 0:25:33 | |
So the only way to prove the theory correct is to try and create the Higgs boson | 0:25:33 | 0:25:39 | |
for an instant inside a particle collider. | 0:25:39 | 0:25:42 | |
Some thought that Fermilab with its powerful Tevatron collider would have found it. | 0:25:49 | 0:25:53 | |
Fermilab is working day and night, night and day with a machine | 0:25:56 | 0:26:00 | |
that's ever increasing the number of collisions | 0:26:00 | 0:26:04 | |
but I would say probabilistically we won't find it. | 0:26:04 | 0:26:10 | |
Ever since the Higgs particle was dreamt up and despite billions of dollars worth of research, | 0:26:12 | 0:26:18 | |
Fermilab has not seen even a hint that the God particle exists. | 0:26:18 | 0:26:25 | |
So the hunt for the Higgs boson is about to step up a gear at CERN... | 0:26:32 | 0:26:35 | |
..where Europe is about to overtake America in the high-energy particle-hunting race. | 0:26:37 | 0:26:42 | |
Building an instrument capable of recreating the early universe | 0:26:48 | 0:26:52 | |
and finding the massive Higgs boson has taken decades. | 0:26:52 | 0:26:55 | |
We've had to devise new ways of handling uniquely, not one, | 0:26:58 | 0:27:03 | |
but the two most powerful proton beams ever created. | 0:27:03 | 0:27:07 | |
There'll be a beam of protons going that way in that pipe at almost the speed of light, | 0:27:10 | 0:27:15 | |
another beam of protons going that way in that pipe, | 0:27:15 | 0:27:19 | |
at almost the speed of light and they'll cross inside Atlas and recreate the conditions | 0:27:19 | 0:27:25 | |
that were present just after the beginning of the universe. | 0:27:25 | 0:27:29 | |
Fantastic. | 0:27:29 | 0:27:32 | |
A ring of 9,500 super-conducting magnets has been designed | 0:27:32 | 0:27:37 | |
to safely contain and control the direction of the proton beams. | 0:27:37 | 0:27:42 | |
13,000 amps of current to the magnets, | 0:27:42 | 0:27:47 | |
1.9 Kelvin minus 271 degrees, colder than the space between the galaxies to cool the magnets down | 0:27:47 | 0:27:55 | |
and then the two beam pipes, one there and one there. | 0:27:55 | 0:28:00 | |
All joined up, these magnets make a collider four times longer than Fermilab's Tethertron. | 0:28:01 | 0:28:07 | |
To put the scale of the experiment in context, each circuit the protons make | 0:28:08 | 0:28:13 | |
is the same distance as the half-way mark from England to France along the Channel Tunnel | 0:28:13 | 0:28:21 | |
and they'll do this 11,000 times a second. | 0:28:21 | 0:28:24 | |
To understand how we hope to transform two tiny protons | 0:28:33 | 0:28:39 | |
into a massive Higgs boson requires the help of a genius. | 0:28:39 | 0:28:44 | |
Einstein's astonishing insight into the connection between matter | 0:28:46 | 0:28:51 | |
and energy is the engine which drives all particle physics. | 0:28:51 | 0:28:57 | |
His theory used just five characters | 0:28:58 | 0:29:01 | |
but with them he had shown us the way to a modern form of alchemy. | 0:29:01 | 0:29:07 | |
Einstein's famous equation, E = mc2, | 0:29:08 | 0:29:12 | |
that basically says that energy and mass are two sides of the same coin. | 0:29:12 | 0:29:16 | |
They're basically the same thing and they're interchangeable. | 0:29:16 | 0:29:19 | |
In this idea I think that Einstein was truly the first. | 0:29:19 | 0:29:23 | |
Mass is just a form of energy. | 0:29:23 | 0:29:25 | |
That was a very deep insight of Einstein. | 0:29:25 | 0:29:27 | |
There's absolutely no question. And there was no precedent for that idea. | 0:29:27 | 0:29:33 | |
One thing we take for granted as particle physicists is that we can convert energy into mass. | 0:29:33 | 0:29:38 | |
We do it all the time. That's how the LHC essentially works. | 0:29:38 | 0:29:42 | |
It speeds protons around faster and faster, gives them more and more energy | 0:29:42 | 0:29:46 | |
and then smashes them together, and the idea is to make new particles, like the Higgs boson, for example, | 0:29:46 | 0:29:52 | |
that's many, many tens or even hundreds of times heavier than the protons that collided to make it. | 0:29:52 | 0:29:58 | |
So Einstein's most famous equation is at the heart of the hunt for the Higgs particle. | 0:30:02 | 0:30:08 | |
In effect, the Large Hadron Collider is a relativity machine. | 0:30:08 | 0:30:13 | |
When the ultra high-speed protons smash into one another, they'll have phenomenal amounts of energy. | 0:30:14 | 0:30:21 | |
Each collision can produce hundreds of new particles. | 0:30:23 | 0:30:28 | |
For a moment, we've created a mini Big Bang. | 0:30:28 | 0:30:32 | |
It's in these "events", as they're known, | 0:30:32 | 0:30:35 | |
that we hope for a fleeting moment that the massive Higgs particle will be seen | 0:30:35 | 0:30:41 | |
for the first time in 13.7 billion years. | 0:30:41 | 0:30:45 | |
These will be the highest-energy collisions we've ever made. | 0:30:47 | 0:30:52 | |
It's led some to wonder if we know what we're doing. | 0:30:52 | 0:30:55 | |
One of the wildest speculations is that the LHC will be capable | 0:31:02 | 0:31:06 | |
of creating black holes that will devour the Earth. | 0:31:06 | 0:31:10 | |
I get page after page of e-mails saying, | 0:31:13 | 0:31:17 | |
"You maniac, you're going to destroy the planet!" | 0:31:17 | 0:31:21 | |
What do you say to these people? You must get the same e-mails. | 0:31:21 | 0:31:24 | |
I've seen that too. It's what everybody wants to know about | 0:31:24 | 0:31:27 | |
cos it's such a cool idea, right? Here we have LHC, | 0:31:27 | 0:31:30 | |
looking at the universe at the earliest time. What if it could make black holes? | 0:31:30 | 0:31:34 | |
Wow! Two interesting things happening at the same time. | 0:31:34 | 0:31:37 | |
But personally speaking I think it's incredibly unlikely. | 0:31:37 | 0:31:39 | |
I don't think there's any way they can be made. | 0:31:39 | 0:31:42 | |
Don't forget, people take this very seriously. | 0:31:42 | 0:31:45 | |
When there was this theory that came out that we could make black holes, | 0:31:45 | 0:31:48 | |
CERN took it so seriously that they made this special risk assessment, really just to make sure | 0:31:48 | 0:31:53 | |
that there wasn't going to be anything untoward happening. So no-one need worry. | 0:31:53 | 0:31:58 | |
I really think that there's absolutely no way we are going | 0:31:58 | 0:32:01 | |
to make anything like that. It's just too strange a theory. | 0:32:01 | 0:32:05 | |
Even if black holes do show up, they will not destroy the Earth. | 0:32:06 | 0:32:12 | |
'Much more likely is that the LHC will create Higgs particles | 0:32:12 | 0:32:16 | |
'and we've had to go to extraordinary lengths to be sure of detecting them.' | 0:32:16 | 0:32:21 | |
Not one, but four colossal particle detectors have been installed | 0:32:21 | 0:32:26 | |
around the ring to take pictures of what happens when protons collide. | 0:32:26 | 0:32:31 | |
Early particle detectors also took photographs of similar events. | 0:32:37 | 0:32:41 | |
It's these pictures that first captured | 0:32:41 | 0:32:44 | |
the fundamental particles in the Standard Model. | 0:32:44 | 0:32:47 | |
Here is evidence for a neutrino caught on film. | 0:32:47 | 0:32:51 | |
This was the first glimpse of the W boson at CERN in the 1980s. | 0:32:54 | 0:32:58 | |
And the Z boson's scientific debut. | 0:33:00 | 0:33:04 | |
But the one missing picture, | 0:33:06 | 0:33:08 | |
the one that would go on the wall if we find it, is the Higgs boson. | 0:33:08 | 0:33:13 | |
The reason it's been so elusive is to do with its mass. | 0:33:16 | 0:33:20 | |
Our theories predict that the Higgs particle is immensely heavy | 0:33:22 | 0:33:26 | |
and it's a general rule in particle physics | 0:33:26 | 0:33:29 | |
that heavy particles are unstable. | 0:33:29 | 0:33:32 | |
They simply fall apart into lighter particles. | 0:33:32 | 0:33:36 | |
So if the Higgs is a real part of nature, | 0:33:36 | 0:33:40 | |
it would have long ago vanished from the early universe. | 0:33:40 | 0:33:44 | |
And today, even if we manage to recreate the Higgs, | 0:33:44 | 0:33:47 | |
-it'll disappear... -EXPLOSION | 0:33:47 | 0:33:50 | |
..before we can see it. | 0:33:50 | 0:33:53 | |
Instead, we'll be hunting for its decay artefacts, | 0:33:54 | 0:33:59 | |
other Standard Model particles like W and Z bosons, quarks and muons. | 0:33:59 | 0:34:05 | |
This is a simulation of a single proton/proton collision at the LHC. | 0:34:05 | 0:34:11 | |
It's actually the simulation of the production of a Higgs particle. | 0:34:11 | 0:34:15 | |
Now, the Higgs particle you don't see, of course. | 0:34:15 | 0:34:17 | |
It just decays in a fraction of a second. | 0:34:17 | 0:34:20 | |
But what you do see is the smoking gun, | 0:34:20 | 0:34:23 | |
in this case, two very clear red tracks, | 0:34:23 | 0:34:27 | |
these two particles here, called muons, | 0:34:27 | 0:34:30 | |
that have gone straight out to the very edges of the detector. | 0:34:30 | 0:34:33 | |
And if we see not just one collision like this, but maybe 10, maybe 100, | 0:34:35 | 0:34:40 | |
then we'll have discovered the Higgs and for the first time | 0:34:40 | 0:34:43 | |
we'll understand the origin of mass in the universe. | 0:34:43 | 0:34:47 | |
That is if the experiment works. | 0:34:51 | 0:34:54 | |
Switching on the planet's largest particle collider is an anxious time for everyone. | 0:34:54 | 0:35:01 | |
The sheer magnitude of this complex machine | 0:35:04 | 0:35:08 | |
and the power in the beam | 0:35:08 | 0:35:10 | |
is something that nobody's ever done in the world, | 0:35:10 | 0:35:14 | |
and we have to not forget anything important that we destroy something. | 0:35:14 | 0:35:19 | |
It takes months to cool each section of the LHC down | 0:35:24 | 0:35:28 | |
to its operating temperature of less than minus 271 degrees Celsius, | 0:35:28 | 0:35:33 | |
no mean feat since this is colder than deep space. | 0:35:33 | 0:35:38 | |
And if anything fails, it'll be a major setback in the search for the Higgs. | 0:35:40 | 0:35:46 | |
It would take us two, three months to repair that part of the machine, even though it's based on a sector basis, | 0:35:49 | 0:35:55 | |
and it takes enormous time to warm up the whole sector | 0:35:55 | 0:35:58 | |
of 3.3 kilometres, the cryogenic, so there is a lot of time issues involved. | 0:35:58 | 0:36:03 | |
Even one week is too long so certainly two, three months is very long. | 0:36:03 | 0:36:07 | |
People are waiting for beam, waiting for physics. We can't afford that. | 0:36:07 | 0:36:13 | |
So CERN's management decided last year to cancel | 0:36:14 | 0:36:17 | |
an engineering run scheduled to test the entire ring. | 0:36:17 | 0:36:21 | |
Instead of beginning slowly with some safe but dull low-energy collisions, | 0:36:22 | 0:36:27 | |
the machine's first run will accelerate particles | 0:36:27 | 0:36:32 | |
to high energies straight away. | 0:36:32 | 0:36:35 | |
If it works, this incredible machine, this vast effort | 0:36:36 | 0:36:40 | |
of thousands of scientists and billions of Euros | 0:36:40 | 0:36:44 | |
is certain to change our understanding of the universe. | 0:36:44 | 0:36:48 | |
If the Higgs exists, then it'll be created here | 0:36:51 | 0:36:55 | |
in the centre of Atlas over the next few years. | 0:36:55 | 0:36:59 | |
If we don't see it, then it wouldn't help to build a bigger machine and a bigger accelerator. | 0:36:59 | 0:37:05 | |
It really means that the God particle doesn't exist. | 0:37:05 | 0:37:09 | |
And for some theorists, finding nothing at the LHC | 0:37:14 | 0:37:18 | |
is actually the most exciting prospect. | 0:37:18 | 0:37:21 | |
It can be argued that the most interesting discovery at the LHC | 0:37:25 | 0:37:29 | |
would be that we cannot find the Higgs, | 0:37:29 | 0:37:33 | |
proving practically that it isn't there. | 0:37:33 | 0:37:35 | |
That would mean that we really haven't understood something, | 0:37:35 | 0:37:39 | |
very deeply not understood something. That's a very good scene for science. | 0:37:39 | 0:37:43 | |
Revolutions sometimes come from the fact that you hit a wall | 0:37:43 | 0:37:46 | |
and you realise that you truly haven't understood anything. | 0:37:46 | 0:37:50 | |
The theorists may long for a revolution but most of us | 0:37:59 | 0:38:03 | |
are pretty sure that the Higgs boson is a real part of nature. | 0:38:03 | 0:38:07 | |
What are the chances we're ever going to solve the mystery of mass? | 0:38:11 | 0:38:16 | |
For the first time in a generation | 0:38:34 | 0:38:37 | |
we stand at a crossroads in physics | 0:38:37 | 0:38:41 | |
and that's what makes this place so exciting, | 0:38:41 | 0:38:45 | |
because nobody knows what the next steps are in our quest | 0:38:45 | 0:38:50 | |
to understand the universe, | 0:38:50 | 0:38:53 | |
but I'm convinced that this place will show us the way | 0:38:53 | 0:38:57 | |
to new physics. | 0:38:57 | 0:38:59 | |
Even if the Higgs boson does turn up at the launch party, | 0:39:19 | 0:39:22 | |
work at the Big Bang machine won't stop. | 0:39:22 | 0:39:26 | |
Beyond the mystery of mass lies a much thornier challenge | 0:39:26 | 0:39:31 | |
for the Standard Model, a puzzle that defeated even Einstein. | 0:39:31 | 0:39:36 | |
Why does the world appear to obey different rules? | 0:39:45 | 0:39:49 | |
There's the world of the small, the quantum world, | 0:39:49 | 0:39:53 | |
that the Standard Model explains so well, | 0:39:53 | 0:39:56 | |
and then there's the world of the large, | 0:39:56 | 0:39:59 | |
the world of stars and planets and galaxies. | 0:39:59 | 0:40:02 | |
The Standard Model has nothing to say about how they interact. | 0:40:02 | 0:40:05 | |
And it's a problem we've yet to solve. | 0:40:09 | 0:40:13 | |
When you want to understand the way the universe has evolved - | 0:40:25 | 0:40:30 | |
so what happened to it straight after it began and how it got to how it is today - | 0:40:30 | 0:40:35 | |
you've not only got to know about how many galaxies there are, | 0:40:35 | 0:40:38 | |
the way that stars work and the way that planets form... | 0:40:38 | 0:40:41 | |
..you've also got to know what the fundamental building blocks | 0:40:44 | 0:40:48 | |
of all those things are and how they interact together. | 0:40:48 | 0:40:51 | |
And in particular it's not only the stuff that's in the universe, | 0:40:53 | 0:40:57 | |
but the way that stuff talks to other stuff. It's about the forces. | 0:40:57 | 0:41:00 | |
If these forces didn't act on matter, nothing would happen. | 0:41:01 | 0:41:07 | |
The stars wouldn't shine, | 0:41:07 | 0:41:09 | |
the atoms that make up the planetary bodies would fall apart. | 0:41:09 | 0:41:14 | |
The universe would disintegrate. | 0:41:16 | 0:41:19 | |
It's the forces in the Standard Model which hold everything together. | 0:41:22 | 0:41:27 | |
There are four forces that we know of in the universe at the moment, | 0:41:29 | 0:41:33 | |
the thing called the strong force which sticks nuclei together... | 0:41:33 | 0:41:37 | |
This strong force is what binds the quarks together | 0:41:37 | 0:41:40 | |
to form the nucleus at the heart of the atom. | 0:41:40 | 0:41:44 | |
There's electro-magnetism, that kind of quite familiar force to everyone. | 0:41:44 | 0:41:49 | |
This force holds the electrons in orbit around the atomic nucleus. | 0:41:49 | 0:41:54 | |
And a thing called the weak force which is quite unfamiliar | 0:41:55 | 0:41:59 | |
but it allows the sun to shine, so it's incredibly important. | 0:41:59 | 0:42:02 | |
The weak force explains why some atoms undergo radioactive decay, | 0:42:03 | 0:42:09 | |
the process which fuels every star in the universe. | 0:42:09 | 0:42:13 | |
But, crucially, one force is missing from the Standard Model. | 0:42:20 | 0:42:24 | |
Gravity. | 0:42:32 | 0:42:34 | |
In the everyday world you and I inhabit, | 0:42:37 | 0:42:40 | |
clearly gravity is all around us. | 0:42:40 | 0:42:43 | |
It's what keeps you in your chair at home, | 0:42:47 | 0:42:50 | |
it's what keeps Earth in orbit around the Sun | 0:42:50 | 0:42:53 | |
and it's what holds our galaxy together. | 0:42:53 | 0:42:56 | |
And Einstein too thought gravity was pretty important. | 0:43:05 | 0:43:09 | |
His General Theory of Relativity beautifully describes | 0:43:10 | 0:43:15 | |
how every celestial body interacts with every other body | 0:43:15 | 0:43:19 | |
through this force. | 0:43:19 | 0:43:21 | |
'The universe on the grand scale can be entirely explained | 0:43:26 | 0:43:31 | |
'by Einstein's equations.' | 0:43:31 | 0:43:34 | |
But there's a problem. | 0:43:36 | 0:43:38 | |
The moment we try to merge General Relativity with the Standard Model, | 0:43:41 | 0:43:46 | |
we encounter immense difficulties, | 0:43:46 | 0:43:49 | |
so immense, in fact, that nobody's been able to work out how to do it. | 0:43:49 | 0:43:54 | |
They're completely incompatible pictures of the universe. | 0:43:54 | 0:43:59 | |
The problem is they're pictures of the same universe. | 0:43:59 | 0:44:03 | |
Something has to be wrong. | 0:44:03 | 0:44:05 | |
The Standard Model is incredibly powerful at describing the world of the small, the quantum world. | 0:44:06 | 0:44:12 | |
But as soon as you try to add gravity into the Standard Model equations, they break. | 0:44:15 | 0:44:21 | |
Einstein was searching for just one set of equations | 0:44:23 | 0:44:28 | |
that would work on both planets and particles, | 0:44:28 | 0:44:32 | |
nothing less than a theory of everything. | 0:44:32 | 0:44:35 | |
This was Einstein's greatest failure. | 0:44:37 | 0:44:41 | |
At the smallest distance scales, his theory just falls apart. | 0:44:41 | 0:44:45 | |
Einstein spent the last 30 years of his life trying to rectify the problem | 0:44:46 | 0:44:51 | |
but he never succeeded. | 0:44:51 | 0:44:53 | |
'53 years after Einstein's death his theory of everything still eludes us.' | 0:45:01 | 0:45:07 | |
This is CERN's theory corridor. | 0:45:16 | 0:45:19 | |
Inside each room is a theoretical physicist. | 0:45:21 | 0:45:24 | |
And inside the head of each theoretical physicist | 0:45:28 | 0:45:31 | |
is a different conception of our universe. | 0:45:31 | 0:45:35 | |
'The first physicist to coin the term "a theory of everything" | 0:45:38 | 0:45:43 | |
'was CERN's John Ellis.' | 0:45:43 | 0:45:46 | |
When we talk about a theory of everything, | 0:45:48 | 0:45:51 | |
we mean a theory of the fundamental constituents | 0:45:51 | 0:45:56 | |
of matter and the forces between them. | 0:45:56 | 0:46:00 | |
You can somehow think of it as a sort of cosmic genetic code, right? | 0:46:00 | 0:46:07 | |
In fact, the Standard Model already you can regard | 0:46:07 | 0:46:10 | |
as being a sort of genetic code for making up the regular visible matter in the universe. | 0:46:10 | 0:46:16 | |
All the visible matter in the universe is made up out of the same quarks and electrons and things | 0:46:16 | 0:46:21 | |
that we can measure in the laboratory. | 0:46:21 | 0:46:23 | |
Somehow or other, these things can be combined in all sorts of ways | 0:46:23 | 0:46:29 | |
to make people as complicated and bizarre as you or me. | 0:46:29 | 0:46:34 | |
The search for this cosmic genetic code is the ultimate quest for physicists. | 0:46:36 | 0:46:42 | |
We want to finish what Einstein started. | 0:46:42 | 0:46:45 | |
You might wonder why we believe the baffling complexity of the universe | 0:46:50 | 0:46:54 | |
can ever be reduced to a single theory. | 0:46:54 | 0:46:58 | |
The answer can be found back at the Big Bang. | 0:46:58 | 0:47:02 | |
If we journey back through time, the universe shrinks, | 0:47:04 | 0:47:09 | |
galaxies disappear and the stars evaporate into gas. | 0:47:09 | 0:47:14 | |
As we draw to within a couple of hundred thousand years of the Big Bang, the universe becomes opaque. | 0:47:18 | 0:47:26 | |
Eventually we approach the moment when atoms vanish. | 0:47:29 | 0:47:33 | |
Now things get really strange. | 0:47:36 | 0:47:39 | |
Seconds away from the Big Bang, the atomic nuclei break apart. | 0:47:41 | 0:47:45 | |
The universe is now so small and so hot | 0:47:48 | 0:47:52 | |
that only the naked fundamental particles of the Standard Model exist. | 0:47:52 | 0:47:57 | |
This is the time of the Higgs. | 0:48:01 | 0:48:04 | |
It's at this time that the LHC will spend most of its working life. | 0:48:06 | 0:48:11 | |
This is what this machine was designed to do, to open a window onto the time | 0:48:14 | 0:48:20 | |
when the Higgs ruled the universe. | 0:48:20 | 0:48:23 | |
But some of us believe that it may give us a glimpse of something even more profound. | 0:48:23 | 0:48:28 | |
Beyond the Higgs, the universe continues to condense. | 0:48:31 | 0:48:36 | |
Eventually even the fundamental particles | 0:48:36 | 0:48:39 | |
of the Standard Model disappear. | 0:48:39 | 0:48:42 | |
We are approaching the moment of the Big Bang itself. | 0:48:42 | 0:48:46 | |
In the instant of creation there must have been a time | 0:48:46 | 0:48:49 | |
when the universe was nothing more than a single, unimaginably hot, | 0:48:49 | 0:48:54 | |
fantastically small entity, | 0:48:54 | 0:48:57 | |
the entire universe was made of just one thing, | 0:48:57 | 0:49:01 | |
pregnant with possibilities. | 0:49:01 | 0:49:04 | |
Remarkably, we have a highly speculative theory | 0:49:07 | 0:49:10 | |
that attempts to describe this era. | 0:49:10 | 0:49:13 | |
It's called String Theory. | 0:49:13 | 0:49:16 | |
The String Theory concept is that particles, the objects that exist, | 0:49:17 | 0:49:23 | |
are actually vibrations of a single string | 0:49:23 | 0:49:26 | |
and like, like the notes of a piano, | 0:49:26 | 0:49:31 | |
they vibrate once or twice or three times, and each note corresponds to a different particle. | 0:49:31 | 0:49:36 | |
So if everything was just a note that you could play on the piano, | 0:49:36 | 0:49:40 | |
a single piano, maybe a single string, that would be a very simple idea. | 0:49:40 | 0:49:43 | |
String theory is certainly the best candidate we have for a theory of everything which would combine | 0:49:43 | 0:49:49 | |
all the different forces, all the different particles and make a decent cup of coffee. | 0:49:49 | 0:49:54 | |
These peculiar strings, if they exist, | 0:49:56 | 0:50:00 | |
are our best attempt to understand what might underpin everything. | 0:50:00 | 0:50:06 | |
They're unimaginably small, | 0:50:06 | 0:50:09 | |
they were the first things in the universe, | 0:50:09 | 0:50:12 | |
and they have multiplied to create every particle we see today. | 0:50:12 | 0:50:19 | |
Incredibly, String Theory may succeed | 0:50:27 | 0:50:30 | |
where the Standard Model fails... | 0:50:30 | 0:50:33 | |
..because when gravity is added to the Standard Model, | 0:50:34 | 0:50:38 | |
the equations break down and produce infinities. | 0:50:38 | 0:50:42 | |
These horrendous infinite answers come about, | 0:50:47 | 0:50:51 | |
we think, because we're treating the particles as being tiny little points | 0:50:51 | 0:50:56 | |
and when you bring these tiny little points together | 0:50:56 | 0:50:59 | |
the gravitational force becomes incredibly strong | 0:50:59 | 0:51:02 | |
and we don't know how to handle that. | 0:51:02 | 0:51:05 | |
Gravity can become so strong because point light particles | 0:51:08 | 0:51:13 | |
can get infinitely close together... | 0:51:13 | 0:51:16 | |
..and that means that the gravitational force between them | 0:51:17 | 0:51:22 | |
becomes infinitely strong. | 0:51:22 | 0:51:24 | |
Supposing the particles, instead of being tiny little points, | 0:51:26 | 0:51:30 | |
were sort of warm, fuzzy, extended things, right? | 0:51:30 | 0:51:35 | |
Then you could bring them together and the gravitational force would not blow up in your face. | 0:51:35 | 0:51:40 | |
So maybe that's the answer, maybe particles are not actually points | 0:51:40 | 0:51:45 | |
but actually extended objects, maybe they're pieces of string. | 0:51:45 | 0:51:50 | |
Strange as it may seem, by imagining a universe made of string, | 0:51:51 | 0:51:57 | |
we have a way of creating the extra space that gravity needs to work. | 0:51:57 | 0:52:02 | |
The extraordinary thing about String Theory is that, for the first time | 0:52:07 | 0:52:12 | |
in the history of physics, it offers a bridge | 0:52:12 | 0:52:16 | |
between the two contradictory descriptions of the world we see today - | 0:52:16 | 0:52:21 | |
the Standard Model of particle physics and Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. | 0:52:21 | 0:52:26 | |
It's a contender for a theory of everything. | 0:52:26 | 0:52:30 | |
What would Einstein have thought of our current attempts to bring General Relativity into the fold? | 0:52:30 | 0:52:36 | |
What would he have thought of String Theory? | 0:52:36 | 0:52:39 | |
I think he would have been delighted for a while. | 0:52:39 | 0:52:44 | |
That is to say, he would have been fascinated by the beauty of the theory | 0:52:44 | 0:52:49 | |
till he realised that it didn't have any convincing predictions | 0:52:49 | 0:52:56 | |
that we could check now. He would be very unhappy about that. | 0:52:56 | 0:53:02 | |
Einstein would have spurned String Theory | 0:53:03 | 0:53:06 | |
because so far nobody has produced a single prediction that we can put to the test. | 0:53:06 | 0:53:12 | |
It remains an intriguing but unprovable concept. | 0:53:12 | 0:53:17 | |
This is science at its most esoteric. | 0:53:21 | 0:53:25 | |
It's like philosophy, religion even, because all it has going for it is beauty. | 0:53:25 | 0:53:32 | |
We have a mathematical description of the first few moments after creation but nothing more. | 0:53:32 | 0:53:39 | |
To see far enough back in time to discover a string would require a collider the size of our galaxy. | 0:53:40 | 0:53:47 | |
For now, the LHC is as large as it gets, | 0:53:49 | 0:53:55 | |
although perhaps instead of creating a string we can search for one of its most remarkable properties. | 0:53:55 | 0:54:01 | |
The original idea was that, OK if they're not points, maybe they extend out | 0:54:05 | 0:54:09 | |
along some sort of line, might be a curvy line, like a piece of string. | 0:54:09 | 0:54:13 | |
That's named the String Theory. | 0:54:13 | 0:54:15 | |
In fact, people realised that that's not enough. | 0:54:15 | 0:54:18 | |
If they're going to be extended in one dimension, | 0:54:18 | 0:54:22 | |
they're probably extended in two dimensions, maybe three dimensions, maybe more dimensions. | 0:54:22 | 0:54:27 | |
So in fact String Theory nowadays is a bit of a wrong name, right? | 0:54:27 | 0:54:33 | |
And in fact people nowadays often talk about something called M Theory, | 0:54:33 | 0:54:37 | |
which is supposed to contain this idea that particles are not just extended in one dimension | 0:54:37 | 0:54:43 | |
but maybe M for many dimensions. | 0:54:43 | 0:54:46 | |
Multiple dimensions are notoriously difficult to imagine, | 0:54:52 | 0:54:55 | |
let alone detect, | 0:54:55 | 0:54:58 | |
yet one of the wildest hopes is that we might just catch sight | 0:54:58 | 0:55:02 | |
of an extra dimension at the LHC. | 0:55:02 | 0:55:05 | |
Space has three dimensions, | 0:55:07 | 0:55:09 | |
we all know that. But we think that maybe each point of our space | 0:55:09 | 0:55:13 | |
is actually not a point but a sort of little sphere | 0:55:13 | 0:55:17 | |
with extra dimensions inside. | 0:55:17 | 0:55:20 | |
And if we could penetrate into these little spheres at the energies | 0:55:20 | 0:55:24 | |
that we are exploring, maybe we'll find these extra dimensions. | 0:55:24 | 0:55:28 | |
That idea of extra dimensions is very connected with String Theory. | 0:55:28 | 0:55:34 | |
If we do detect another dimension at the LHC, | 0:55:40 | 0:55:44 | |
then we'll be able to show that the universe is at least a place where strings might feel at home, | 0:55:44 | 0:55:52 | |
a universe in which gravity and the other forces can harmoniously co-exist in our mathematics. | 0:55:52 | 0:55:59 | |
We'll be one step closer to completing our story of creation. | 0:56:00 | 0:56:06 | |
This is maybe the most important thing about the LHC. | 0:56:08 | 0:56:11 | |
For a long time now, we've been speculating about String Theory, | 0:56:11 | 0:56:15 | |
about extra dimensions, | 0:56:15 | 0:56:17 | |
but we haven't had hard facts to confront them with. | 0:56:17 | 0:56:21 | |
Now, if we find extra dimensions at the LHC, that would be kind of a hint | 0:56:24 | 0:56:30 | |
that String Theory might be right, but it wouldn't be a proof. | 0:56:30 | 0:56:34 | |
It would be, if you like, a smoking gun for String Theory. | 0:56:34 | 0:56:37 | |
But it would encourage us to think that maybe we were on the right track. | 0:56:37 | 0:56:41 | |
It would be a tremendous breakthrough, | 0:56:44 | 0:56:47 | |
but with today's technology | 0:56:47 | 0:56:50 | |
finding another dimension | 0:56:50 | 0:56:53 | |
is highly unlikely. | 0:56:53 | 0:56:56 | |
The LHC will allow us to explore the earliest times in the universe. | 0:57:00 | 0:57:06 | |
Within a few years it will tell us whether the Higgs boson, the God particle, really exists. | 0:57:06 | 0:57:13 | |
And it may even tell us that there are extra dimensions in the universe. | 0:57:16 | 0:57:21 | |
This is exploration. | 0:57:21 | 0:57:23 | |
It's a journey to the very edge of our understanding. | 0:57:23 | 0:57:27 | |
Today is the moment. | 0:57:33 | 0:57:36 | |
We don't know what the LHC is going to discover. | 0:57:37 | 0:57:41 | |
We've got all these ideas. They can't all be right, a lot of them are going to be proved to be wrong. | 0:57:41 | 0:57:46 | |
But if just one of them gets proved to be right, | 0:57:46 | 0:57:49 | |
then it's going to be the most exciting event in my scientific lifetime. | 0:57:49 | 0:57:54 | |
And, for me, that's what science at the Large Hadron Collider is all about. | 0:57:56 | 0:58:02 | |
It represents the noblest side of humanity - | 0:58:02 | 0:58:06 | |
our need to know. | 0:58:06 | 0:58:10 | |
Subtitles by Red Bee Media Ltd. | 0:58:32 | 0:58:36 | |
E-mail [email protected] | 0:58:36 | 0:58:40 |