Browse content similar to The Trouble with Space Junk. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
'Down, I see her. Right cable is down.' | 0:00:07 | 0:00:09 | |
'OK to go for configuration, Steve.' | 0:00:11 | 0:00:12 | |
'Thank you, Al.' | 0:00:12 | 0:00:13 | |
220 miles above the Earth on 12th March 2009, | 0:00:16 | 0:00:22 | |
was a day like any other on the International Space Station. | 0:00:22 | 0:00:27 | |
'Two and three stowed.' | 0:00:27 | 0:00:29 | |
It was mid-morning and I was getting ready to exercise. | 0:00:35 | 0:00:38 | |
And we were just sort of getting into our mid-morning routine, if you will. | 0:00:38 | 0:00:43 | |
'OK, Nick. On my way.' | 0:00:43 | 0:00:45 | |
But then they got an unusual message. | 0:00:46 | 0:00:49 | |
We got a call that we were having "a red conjunction". | 0:00:51 | 0:00:53 | |
We were looking around, "What is a red conjunction?" | 0:00:53 | 0:00:56 | |
Because we hadn't really trained for it. | 0:00:56 | 0:00:58 | |
A red conjunction is a warning code | 0:01:01 | 0:01:04 | |
that the space station could be hit by some orbital debris. | 0:01:04 | 0:01:08 | |
It was a little bit chaotic, | 0:01:11 | 0:01:12 | |
because this was the first time we had had one of these. | 0:01:12 | 0:01:16 | |
The space station was travelling at nearly 8km per second. | 0:01:16 | 0:01:20 | |
The space junk was travelling at the same speed | 0:01:21 | 0:01:23 | |
in the opposite direction. | 0:01:23 | 0:01:25 | |
If they hit, the consequences could be catastrophic. | 0:01:29 | 0:01:33 | |
It gets hit by something relatively small... | 0:01:38 | 0:01:40 | |
..penetrates, but because of the pressure inside, | 0:01:43 | 0:01:45 | |
it just forces the modules to open up just like a balloon bursting. | 0:01:45 | 0:01:49 | |
And that happens extremely quickly, | 0:01:51 | 0:01:53 | |
with no chance that an astronaut in that module could ever get out. | 0:01:53 | 0:01:58 | |
'Copy, Al. You're on your way to the station.' | 0:01:58 | 0:02:01 | |
Nasa was taking no chances | 0:02:02 | 0:02:04 | |
and scrambled astronaut Sandra Magnus to the Soyuz life raft. | 0:02:04 | 0:02:09 | |
All she could do then | 0:02:09 | 0:02:11 | |
was sit and wait. | 0:02:11 | 0:02:14 | |
And it's either going to hit or it's not going to hit. | 0:02:16 | 0:02:19 | |
And so worrying about it doesn't help you. | 0:02:19 | 0:02:22 | |
Was this just an isolated incident | 0:02:27 | 0:02:30 | |
or was it a sign of a growing threat to life in space... | 0:02:30 | 0:02:34 | |
..and modern life on Earth? | 0:02:36 | 0:02:39 | |
'And liftoff.' | 0:02:57 | 0:02:59 | |
'First stage move. Propulsion performing normally.' | 0:03:02 | 0:03:05 | |
Space... | 0:03:14 | 0:03:16 | |
..endless and empty. | 0:03:18 | 0:03:20 | |
At least that's what we used to think. | 0:03:21 | 0:03:23 | |
In the last few decades, | 0:03:26 | 0:03:28 | |
orbits around Earth have become crowded with satellites | 0:03:28 | 0:03:31 | |
and littered with space junk. | 0:03:31 | 0:03:34 | |
So space junk is all the stuff that we've launched into orbit | 0:03:37 | 0:03:40 | |
that no longer serves a useful purpose. | 0:03:40 | 0:03:43 | |
So it's satellites, it's rocket bodies, | 0:03:43 | 0:03:46 | |
it's, you know, old gloves. | 0:03:46 | 0:03:47 | |
It's toolkits that astronauts have accidentally dropped. | 0:03:47 | 0:03:51 | |
Basically, litter that we've left in space. | 0:03:53 | 0:03:57 | |
But littering space is much more dangerous than it is on Earth. | 0:04:05 | 0:04:10 | |
Those objects are going at 17,000 miles an hour. | 0:04:11 | 0:04:14 | |
And when you're going 17,000 miles an hour, | 0:04:14 | 0:04:16 | |
it does not take a big piece of debris to ruin your day. | 0:04:16 | 0:04:20 | |
Satellites are virtually defenceless against high-speed orbital debris. | 0:04:30 | 0:04:35 | |
And they are crucial to modern life on Earth. | 0:04:39 | 0:04:43 | |
We are far more connected and far more dependent upon satellites | 0:04:46 | 0:04:51 | |
than most people really know. | 0:04:51 | 0:04:53 | |
The ability to make phone calls, | 0:04:55 | 0:04:56 | |
the way we do it now was just a dream less than 100 years ago. | 0:04:56 | 0:05:01 | |
We're all connected to the internet. | 0:05:02 | 0:05:05 | |
Weather satellites, navigation systems, | 0:05:05 | 0:05:07 | |
it's almost impossible to get lost, | 0:05:07 | 0:05:09 | |
despite what the guidance says on the GPS about turn left and turn right. | 0:05:09 | 0:05:14 | |
All of that and more is becoming increasingly vulnerable. | 0:05:17 | 0:05:22 | |
Unless we tackle the debris problem, | 0:05:23 | 0:05:25 | |
there is going to be no weather forecast, | 0:05:25 | 0:05:27 | |
there is going to be no news story from the other side of the world. | 0:05:27 | 0:05:30 | |
You're not going to be able to turn on the television and see the World Cup. | 0:05:30 | 0:05:33 | |
But how did space become littered with dangerous debris? | 0:05:42 | 0:05:46 | |
'Today, a new moon is in the sky. | 0:05:49 | 0:05:51 | |
'A 23-inch metal spear placed in orbit by a Russian rocket.' | 0:05:51 | 0:05:55 | |
Space was a pristine environment, | 0:05:56 | 0:05:59 | |
until the launch of Sputnik in 1957. | 0:05:59 | 0:06:02 | |
But in the first decades of spaceflight, | 0:06:06 | 0:06:09 | |
every time a rocket or satellite was launched, | 0:06:09 | 0:06:12 | |
it left behind some debris. | 0:06:12 | 0:06:14 | |
No-one thought it was much of a problem until this man, | 0:06:32 | 0:06:36 | |
Donald Kessler, did some calculations. | 0:06:36 | 0:06:39 | |
He was working for Nasa in the late '60s and early '70s, | 0:06:40 | 0:06:44 | |
when he discovered that leaving junk in orbit | 0:06:44 | 0:06:47 | |
wasn't like dumping junk on Earth. | 0:06:47 | 0:06:49 | |
People tend to think of orbit like a road through space. | 0:06:52 | 0:06:55 | |
I mean, as long as you stay on your road, you're not going to get hit. | 0:06:55 | 0:06:58 | |
It would be more accurate to think of the Earth as being | 0:06:58 | 0:07:02 | |
one big paved planet. | 0:07:02 | 0:07:04 | |
And when you want to go someplace, | 0:07:04 | 0:07:06 | |
you drive in a straight line from one place to another | 0:07:06 | 0:07:09 | |
and, of course, with no stop lights and no place to stop | 0:07:09 | 0:07:14 | |
and you're going to be running into each other in all kinds of directions. | 0:07:14 | 0:07:17 | |
And that's exactly what you've got in orbit. | 0:07:17 | 0:07:20 | |
So I headed up with an equation where I could write the spatial density, | 0:07:20 | 0:07:24 | |
its apogee and inclination. | 0:07:24 | 0:07:26 | |
Then you can do neat things like... | 0:07:26 | 0:07:28 | |
His calculations predicted that, | 0:07:28 | 0:07:30 | |
if bits of junk started smashing into each other at such huge speeds... | 0:07:30 | 0:07:35 | |
If you want to know the flux, the spatial density... | 0:07:35 | 0:07:39 | |
..they'd create a cascade of collisions | 0:07:39 | 0:07:41 | |
that would litter orbits with dangerous debris. | 0:07:41 | 0:07:44 | |
The integral of S squared... | 0:07:44 | 0:07:46 | |
This became known as the Kessler Syndrome. | 0:07:46 | 0:07:49 | |
..integrated over the volume. | 0:07:50 | 0:07:52 | |
In other words, if you never launch anything else in space, | 0:07:55 | 0:07:58 | |
there will still be this cascading phenomena that continues to grow | 0:07:58 | 0:08:03 | |
and, actually, it continues until you essentially grind up all the satellites into small dust particles. | 0:08:03 | 0:08:08 | |
Three passed SV and 26. | 0:08:17 | 0:08:19 | |
No time critical commanding. | 0:08:19 | 0:08:20 | |
No satellite conjunctions. Good on step six. | 0:08:20 | 0:08:23 | |
All data feeds to externals are open and both communication lines to the site are good. | 0:08:23 | 0:08:27 | |
No applicable sieves or TPs. You're good to execute. | 0:08:27 | 0:08:29 | |
Copy that, ma'am. | 0:08:29 | 0:08:31 | |
The prospect of this nightmare scenario was so worrying that, | 0:08:33 | 0:08:37 | |
in the early '80s, | 0:08:37 | 0:08:38 | |
the American Air Force started cataloguing space junk. | 0:08:38 | 0:08:42 | |
The technology only allowed them to track objects | 0:08:44 | 0:08:47 | |
slightly bigger than a cricket ball. | 0:08:47 | 0:08:49 | |
Give level one a call on the TTC-56. | 0:08:49 | 0:08:53 | |
They started at 6,000 pieces. | 0:08:54 | 0:08:58 | |
And that number grew slowly to 10,000 over the next two decades, | 0:08:58 | 0:09:03 | |
helped by an international agreement calling for used rocket bodies | 0:09:03 | 0:09:07 | |
to be returned to Earth and burned up in the upper atmosphere. | 0:09:07 | 0:09:12 | |
OK, stand by. | 0:09:12 | 0:09:13 | |
It kept the risk of any major collision very low. | 0:09:17 | 0:09:21 | |
But in 2007, | 0:09:22 | 0:09:24 | |
all that changed. | 0:09:24 | 0:09:26 | |
The Chinese launched a missile | 0:09:28 | 0:09:30 | |
that took out one of their own defunct old satellites | 0:09:30 | 0:09:33 | |
in low Earth orbit. | 0:09:33 | 0:09:35 | |
The American military were under no illusions about what this meant. | 0:09:37 | 0:09:42 | |
Well, I think they did that because they realised | 0:09:43 | 0:09:45 | |
that the United States military | 0:09:45 | 0:09:48 | |
is critically dependent on space. | 0:09:48 | 0:09:50 | |
And they felt like if they were going to be able | 0:09:50 | 0:09:54 | |
to effectively respond to whatever challenges they had in the future, | 0:09:54 | 0:09:58 | |
they needed to develop a way to challenge our space capabilities. | 0:09:58 | 0:10:01 | |
Basically, there's not a single military operation | 0:10:02 | 0:10:04 | |
that takes place in the world today | 0:10:04 | 0:10:06 | |
that is not critically dependent on space capabilities. | 0:10:06 | 0:10:08 | |
And if space goes away, | 0:10:08 | 0:10:10 | |
we do not fight as effectively as we would otherwise. | 0:10:10 | 0:10:12 | |
As Kessler predicted, | 0:10:15 | 0:10:18 | |
collisions in space are more dangerous than those on the ground. | 0:10:18 | 0:10:21 | |
As demonstrated in this computer model. | 0:10:23 | 0:10:26 | |
After the collision, you see quite a compact debris cloud at the start. | 0:10:29 | 0:10:33 | |
But then, because some of the fragments are thrown into higher orbits | 0:10:33 | 0:10:36 | |
and some are thrown into lower orbits, the speed is different. | 0:10:36 | 0:10:39 | |
So you see the debris clouds stretch out and it forms this ring. | 0:10:39 | 0:10:43 | |
Now, because the Earth is not spherical, | 0:10:43 | 0:10:46 | |
it causes that debris ring to start to stretch out. | 0:10:46 | 0:10:50 | |
It moves the orbits around the planet. | 0:10:50 | 0:10:53 | |
So it goes from this kind of compact debris cloud right at the start | 0:10:53 | 0:10:56 | |
to the situation where all of that debris | 0:10:56 | 0:10:59 | |
ends up being distributed all the way around the planet. | 0:10:59 | 0:11:03 | |
Before China took out its old satellite, | 0:11:05 | 0:11:07 | |
the American Air Force were tracking 10,000 objects | 0:11:07 | 0:11:11 | |
in their debris catalogue. | 0:11:11 | 0:11:12 | |
After it, they were tracking an extra 3,000. | 0:11:14 | 0:11:18 | |
The debris field collisions create | 0:11:20 | 0:11:22 | |
is a massive concern for the general | 0:11:22 | 0:11:25 | |
who is in charge of all of America's space operations. | 0:11:25 | 0:11:28 | |
If you go to war in space, then it becomes a kinetic war. | 0:11:29 | 0:11:34 | |
You create a debris field that is just unmanageable | 0:11:34 | 0:11:36 | |
and you can't operate or fly in it. | 0:11:36 | 0:11:38 | |
So I hope to never go to war in space. | 0:11:38 | 0:11:41 | |
But at the same time, if we're threatened, | 0:11:41 | 0:11:44 | |
we have to be able to defend ourselves | 0:11:44 | 0:11:45 | |
and we have to be able to defend ourselves right now. | 0:11:45 | 0:11:48 | |
But the debris problem got worse in 2009 | 0:11:53 | 0:11:57 | |
when an Iridium satellite collided | 0:11:57 | 0:11:59 | |
with an out-of-control Russian Kosmos satellite. | 0:11:59 | 0:12:03 | |
Now they were monitoring 17,000 pieces of junk. | 0:12:05 | 0:12:09 | |
At that number, Kessler's calculations | 0:12:11 | 0:12:14 | |
were forecasting a major collision on average every five years. | 0:12:14 | 0:12:18 | |
And really the situation you start to worry about is that's just one event. | 0:12:19 | 0:12:23 | |
You know, if you start to say, | 0:12:23 | 0:12:25 | |
"We're going to have one of these events every five years | 0:12:25 | 0:12:28 | |
"and that each one is going to generate thousands of fragments," | 0:12:28 | 0:12:31 | |
then you end up in the situation where it's basically, you know, a lottery, | 0:12:31 | 0:12:36 | |
in terms of whether or not your satellite is going to be hit. | 0:12:36 | 0:12:39 | |
We see thousands and thousands of near misses every single day | 0:12:39 | 0:12:44 | |
as a result of all the junk that we've put up there. | 0:12:44 | 0:12:47 | |
But that average of one collision every five years | 0:12:51 | 0:12:54 | |
might not be much of a guide to what happens in the future. | 0:12:54 | 0:12:57 | |
So let's say that you're on a soccer team | 0:12:59 | 0:13:02 | |
and your average is one goal per game. | 0:13:02 | 0:13:06 | |
A 20-game season, you score 20 goals | 0:13:06 | 0:13:09 | |
because you've scored one goal a game. | 0:13:09 | 0:13:12 | |
So, of course, you're very reliable. | 0:13:12 | 0:13:15 | |
However, you could just as well have scored ten goals in two games | 0:13:15 | 0:13:20 | |
and were useless the other 18 games. | 0:13:20 | 0:13:23 | |
Your average is the same, | 0:13:23 | 0:13:24 | |
but the confidence that I have of what you're going to do the next game is going to be much lower. | 0:13:24 | 0:13:29 | |
I don't know whether or not you're going to have a ten-goal game | 0:13:29 | 0:13:32 | |
or a zero-goal game. | 0:13:32 | 0:13:34 | |
The same problem right now having to do with space. | 0:13:34 | 0:13:36 | |
We know the average. | 0:13:36 | 0:13:38 | |
We don't know if the next event's going to occur | 0:13:38 | 0:13:40 | |
in one day or one decade. | 0:13:40 | 0:13:42 | |
So the stakes couldn't be higher. | 0:13:44 | 0:13:46 | |
But until last year, | 0:13:46 | 0:13:48 | |
no-one knew exactly what happened to spacecraft when they collided. | 0:13:48 | 0:13:52 | |
Until this... | 0:13:53 | 0:13:55 | |
This is the work of Patti Scheaffer. | 0:14:03 | 0:14:05 | |
She's a key part of the team that fired a baked bean can-sized object | 0:14:08 | 0:14:12 | |
into a tank roughly the same size as the upper stage of a rocket. | 0:14:12 | 0:14:16 | |
And size mattered. | 0:14:20 | 0:14:23 | |
Well, this was the size of the object. | 0:14:25 | 0:14:27 | |
It was maybe a little bit shorter | 0:14:27 | 0:14:29 | |
but, basically, a large hollow object | 0:14:29 | 0:14:31 | |
is more representative of something that's actually in space, | 0:14:31 | 0:14:34 | |
like maybe a small satellite or a piece of a small satellite. | 0:14:34 | 0:14:38 | |
It also had to be a full-scale test. | 0:14:38 | 0:14:41 | |
Lots of people fire things like that, for instance, | 0:14:41 | 0:14:46 | |
and many things, many physical phenomenon | 0:14:46 | 0:14:48 | |
do not scale with size very well. | 0:14:48 | 0:14:53 | |
So we really wanted to get a full-scale, full-sized test. | 0:14:53 | 0:14:56 | |
It was the culmination of years of work. | 0:14:59 | 0:15:03 | |
But it was over in a flash. | 0:15:03 | 0:15:06 | |
"Is that T minus ten?" | 0:15:06 | 0:15:07 | |
"Yes, that's T minus ten." | 0:15:07 | 0:15:09 | |
"Nine, eight..." And then you hear this... | 0:15:09 | 0:15:12 | |
And the building literally shakes a little bit. | 0:15:13 | 0:15:15 | |
But I think a lot of it is me, you know, just being freaked out. | 0:15:15 | 0:15:19 | |
And then you see your screen flash up and it's over. | 0:15:20 | 0:15:23 | |
All that work is turned into this. | 0:15:24 | 0:15:26 | |
Travelling at 7km per second... | 0:15:30 | 0:15:32 | |
the can made a huge mess. | 0:15:34 | 0:15:36 | |
So this piece of modern art here is what the tank looks like. | 0:15:41 | 0:15:47 | |
Now, this was the top of the tank. | 0:15:47 | 0:15:49 | |
Right here, it folded after it flew through the inside. | 0:15:49 | 0:15:52 | |
But you can see it's all splayed out. | 0:15:52 | 0:15:54 | |
The intense heat from the explosion vaporised huge chunks of metal. | 0:15:55 | 0:16:01 | |
And when it condensed and cooled, she made a startling new discovery. | 0:16:01 | 0:16:05 | |
Flakes of aluminium, which came from bits of the can and the tank. | 0:16:06 | 0:16:11 | |
They might look benign, but in space they'd be lethal. | 0:16:12 | 0:16:17 | |
Now that's about, er... | 0:16:19 | 0:16:21 | |
What is that? 250 milligrams. | 0:16:21 | 0:16:23 | |
That's a little bit bigger, heavier than a ibuprofen pill. | 0:16:23 | 0:16:28 | |
And the energy that would have on orbit | 0:16:28 | 0:16:31 | |
at, say, 14km per second would be, er... | 0:16:31 | 0:16:35 | |
Well, the momentum would be about the same | 0:16:36 | 0:16:38 | |
as a hot-loaded .357 Magnum. | 0:16:38 | 0:16:41 | |
So that's a lot of momentum. | 0:16:41 | 0:16:43 | |
And the energy would be more like | 0:16:43 | 0:16:44 | |
a .50-calibre Browning machine gun sniper round. | 0:16:44 | 0:16:48 | |
So if you're going to think about how dangerous this is on orbit, | 0:16:48 | 0:16:52 | |
think .357 Magnum, .50-calibre sniper round. | 0:16:52 | 0:16:55 | |
Somewhere in there. | 0:16:55 | 0:16:56 | |
And she discovered that the collision generated | 0:17:09 | 0:17:12 | |
hundreds of these flakes. | 0:17:12 | 0:17:13 | |
No-one knew that vaporised metal could be so dangerous. | 0:17:17 | 0:17:21 | |
So if there are many more particles produced than we thought, | 0:17:27 | 0:17:31 | |
10 times, 100 times, 1,000 times more, | 0:17:31 | 0:17:34 | |
then it has a snowball effect, | 0:17:34 | 0:17:36 | |
because each one of those particles, | 0:17:36 | 0:17:38 | |
if there's ten times more, there could be ten times more strikes. | 0:17:38 | 0:17:41 | |
And each one of those makes ten, so that's ten times ten, which is 100. | 0:17:41 | 0:17:45 | |
If there's 100 times more, then each one of those can make strikes, | 0:17:45 | 0:17:49 | |
which is 100 times 100, which is 10,000. | 0:17:49 | 0:17:51 | |
So it snowballs rapidly. | 0:17:51 | 0:17:53 | |
The question is, how rapidly is it going to snowball? | 0:17:53 | 0:17:56 | |
And the only way we can know that | 0:17:56 | 0:17:58 | |
is to know how many of these particles we can't see | 0:17:58 | 0:18:00 | |
are actually made. | 0:18:00 | 0:18:01 | |
But if there are more objects in orbit than previously thought, | 0:18:12 | 0:18:17 | |
there should be more bullet-sized holes | 0:18:17 | 0:18:19 | |
in the biggest thing up there... | 0:18:19 | 0:18:21 | |
..the space station. | 0:18:23 | 0:18:26 | |
'The thing we showed you is still in the socket caddy when you get there.' | 0:18:26 | 0:18:30 | |
'It'll be right of the front module. It'll be right of the front module.' | 0:18:30 | 0:18:33 | |
'You can see almost everything from that vantage point.' | 0:18:33 | 0:18:37 | |
Astronaut Jim Reilly was on a spacewalk | 0:18:37 | 0:18:40 | |
to repair an external radiator on the station | 0:18:40 | 0:18:44 | |
when he spotted something he had never seen before. | 0:18:44 | 0:18:47 | |
And as we're tilting back, we're going past this radiator. | 0:18:49 | 0:18:52 | |
I noticed right out on the end of it, | 0:18:52 | 0:18:53 | |
there were three what looked like bullet holes | 0:18:53 | 0:18:56 | |
about the size of a 7.62 millimetre round. | 0:18:56 | 0:18:59 | |
And it's about the size of my thumb. Three of them, just about that size. | 0:18:59 | 0:19:04 | |
There was a fourth hole on the flight immediately behind mine. | 0:19:04 | 0:19:07 | |
A fellow named Rick Mastracchio was working on the same area. | 0:19:07 | 0:19:10 | |
And down by Rick, there's a fourth bullet hole on there. | 0:19:10 | 0:19:13 | |
The space station can absorb hits from small pieces of junk | 0:19:15 | 0:19:19 | |
because it has a specially constructed hull | 0:19:19 | 0:19:22 | |
made up of an ingenious layering system called a Whipple shield. | 0:19:22 | 0:19:27 | |
What you see here is a mock-up of the Columbus module | 0:19:29 | 0:19:33 | |
of the European Space Agency, | 0:19:33 | 0:19:35 | |
which is on the International Space Station. | 0:19:35 | 0:19:38 | |
And here you see on the outer surface | 0:19:39 | 0:19:41 | |
the Whipple shield has been implemented everywhere. | 0:19:41 | 0:19:44 | |
You see here a cutaway part | 0:19:44 | 0:19:46 | |
and you can see the outer wall, the bumper, | 0:19:46 | 0:19:50 | |
then you have some stuffing shown here | 0:19:50 | 0:19:52 | |
and the inner wall, which is finally supposed to stop the particle. | 0:19:52 | 0:19:57 | |
The layers absorb and dissipate the energy of any strike, | 0:20:06 | 0:20:10 | |
but the protection is only effective | 0:20:10 | 0:20:12 | |
for objects up to one centimetre in size. | 0:20:12 | 0:20:14 | |
Unfortunately, the American Air Force | 0:20:22 | 0:20:25 | |
only has the technology to track objects bigger than ten centimetres, | 0:20:25 | 0:20:30 | |
slightly bigger than a cricket ball. | 0:20:30 | 0:20:32 | |
And that leaves a huge and worrying gap in the space station's defences. | 0:20:32 | 0:20:37 | |
Objects between one centimetre and ten centimetres, roughly, | 0:20:41 | 0:20:44 | |
they can neither be avoided nor shielded. | 0:20:44 | 0:20:48 | |
So there is a dark risk that remains | 0:20:48 | 0:20:50 | |
even for the International Space Station. | 0:20:50 | 0:20:52 | |
If the space station was hit by a piece of debris | 0:21:10 | 0:21:13 | |
of this kind of size... | 0:21:13 | 0:21:15 | |
..it could be devastating. | 0:21:17 | 0:21:19 | |
So the space station is a pressurised module. | 0:21:21 | 0:21:24 | |
That means the pressure inside is greater than the pressure outside. | 0:21:24 | 0:21:27 | |
It's a vacuum outside the space station. | 0:21:27 | 0:21:29 | |
And the equivalent down here is a balloon. | 0:21:29 | 0:21:32 | |
You know, you blow air into a balloon, | 0:21:32 | 0:21:34 | |
the pressure is greater inside the balloon than outside the balloon. | 0:21:34 | 0:21:37 | |
And we all know what happens if you stick a pin into a balloon. | 0:21:37 | 0:21:40 | |
If you look at that balloon bursting in slow motion, | 0:21:43 | 0:21:46 | |
as the pin goes in, the balloon unzips. | 0:21:46 | 0:21:48 | |
And that's one of the things that could happen on the station. | 0:21:52 | 0:21:55 | |
It gets hit by something relatively small, penetrates, | 0:21:55 | 0:21:59 | |
but because of the pressure inside, | 0:21:59 | 0:22:01 | |
it just forces the modules just to open up, | 0:22:01 | 0:22:05 | |
just like a balloon bursting. | 0:22:05 | 0:22:07 | |
And that happens extremely quickly, | 0:22:10 | 0:22:12 | |
with no chance that an astronaut in that module could ever get out. | 0:22:12 | 0:22:16 | |
The space station can manoeuvre out of the way | 0:22:26 | 0:22:29 | |
of any bigger pieces of junk. | 0:22:29 | 0:22:30 | |
But as astronaut Sandra Magnus knows, | 0:22:32 | 0:22:34 | |
it's not like turning the wheel of a car. | 0:22:34 | 0:22:37 | |
You have to program the kind of burn you want to do. | 0:22:37 | 0:22:39 | |
You have to program the manoeuvre | 0:22:39 | 0:22:41 | |
the station needs to get to do the kind of burn you want to do | 0:22:41 | 0:22:43 | |
based on which jets you're using. | 0:22:43 | 0:22:45 | |
It takes several days. | 0:22:45 | 0:22:46 | |
They may have gotten it down faster than that, | 0:22:46 | 0:22:48 | |
but it's not just, "OK, flip a switch, let's move the station." | 0:22:48 | 0:22:51 | |
It's not that straightforward. | 0:22:51 | 0:22:52 | |
In 2014, the station had to move three times | 0:22:54 | 0:22:59 | |
to avoid large chunks of space debris. | 0:22:59 | 0:23:01 | |
But as Sandra Magnus discovered in March 2009, | 0:23:02 | 0:23:06 | |
sometimes there's not enough time to move the station. | 0:23:06 | 0:23:09 | |
It was mid-morning and I was getting ready to exercise | 0:23:20 | 0:23:23 | |
and we were just sort of getting into our mid-morning routine, if you will. | 0:23:23 | 0:23:28 | |
And we got a call that we were having "a red conjunction." | 0:23:28 | 0:23:30 | |
We were looking around, "What is a red conjunction?" | 0:23:30 | 0:23:32 | |
Because we hadn't really trained for it. | 0:23:32 | 0:23:34 | |
A red conjunction is a warning code | 0:23:38 | 0:23:40 | |
that the space station could be hit by some space junk. | 0:23:40 | 0:23:43 | |
This warning is only issued when there's no time to move the station. | 0:23:45 | 0:23:49 | |
It wasn't predicted. | 0:23:51 | 0:23:53 | |
It was a little bit chaotic | 0:23:54 | 0:23:56 | |
because this was the first time we had had one of these. | 0:23:56 | 0:23:59 | |
'Copy, Al. You're on your way.' | 0:23:59 | 0:24:01 | |
Ground Control were tracking a 13cm chunk | 0:24:01 | 0:24:04 | |
of a Delta II rocket body, | 0:24:04 | 0:24:06 | |
about the size of a CD, apparently heading straight for the station. | 0:24:06 | 0:24:12 | |
And Sandra was sent to the Soyuz capsule, | 0:24:12 | 0:24:14 | |
the space station's life raft, | 0:24:14 | 0:24:16 | |
in preparation for a possible evacuation. | 0:24:16 | 0:24:19 | |
When the Soyuz docks to station, it's put in sort of a sleep mode, | 0:24:20 | 0:24:25 | |
because you really don't need it while you're on station, | 0:24:25 | 0:24:28 | |
because it's, you know, your delivery vehicle | 0:24:28 | 0:24:30 | |
and your go home vehicle. | 0:24:30 | 0:24:32 | |
But when you're getting ready to evacuate from the station, | 0:24:32 | 0:24:35 | |
whether it's nominal or a contingency, | 0:24:35 | 0:24:37 | |
you have to power all that stuff up. | 0:24:37 | 0:24:38 | |
And there's a certain sequence of things you have to go through to do that. | 0:24:38 | 0:24:42 | |
But she wasn't panicking. | 0:24:50 | 0:24:52 | |
It's either going to hit or it's not going to hit. | 0:24:52 | 0:24:55 | |
And so worrying about it doesn't help you. | 0:24:55 | 0:24:58 | |
All you have to do is just prepare everything that you need to prepare | 0:24:58 | 0:25:01 | |
so that, if it hits, then you're in the best possible configuration. | 0:25:01 | 0:25:05 | |
And if it doesn't hit, well, then, you just go and do it anyway. | 0:25:05 | 0:25:08 | |
The Soyuz has a small window. | 0:25:10 | 0:25:12 | |
And as she sat and waited, she couldn't stop herself looking out. | 0:25:13 | 0:25:18 | |
So I'm looking out the portal thinking, "Oh, maybe I can see it." | 0:25:20 | 0:25:23 | |
You know, your view is like this, right? | 0:25:23 | 0:25:26 | |
It's like looking out of a peephole of a door. | 0:25:26 | 0:25:28 | |
I was laughing to myself, "Go on, there's no way." | 0:25:28 | 0:25:30 | |
Because if I saw it, it would be really bad, because it'd be right there. | 0:25:30 | 0:25:34 | |
Fortunately, the junk sailed by and the station was undamaged. | 0:25:36 | 0:25:40 | |
But the crisis did force the astronauts and Nasa | 0:25:40 | 0:25:43 | |
to re-evaluate what they would do if it happened again. | 0:25:43 | 0:25:47 | |
We got through it. It was all good. | 0:25:51 | 0:25:52 | |
So it wasn't that everybody didn't know what's needed to be done. | 0:25:52 | 0:25:55 | |
But it's like, what order do you communicate? | 0:25:55 | 0:25:57 | |
What's the most important thing you communicate? Who communicates what to who? | 0:25:57 | 0:26:01 | |
So there was a lot of refinement that needed to happen | 0:26:01 | 0:26:03 | |
and so we instituted that after this. | 0:26:03 | 0:26:05 | |
'OK, hatch opened and stowed.' | 0:26:11 | 0:26:14 | |
Since that near miss in 2009, | 0:26:18 | 0:26:21 | |
the amount of trackable orbital debris has gone up by over 20% | 0:26:21 | 0:26:26 | |
to 22,000 pieces. | 0:26:26 | 0:26:30 | |
'Before receiving, gate closed and locked.' | 0:26:36 | 0:26:40 | |
But scientists calculate that there are hundreds of millions of pieces of debris | 0:26:42 | 0:26:46 | |
that are too small to track | 0:26:46 | 0:26:48 | |
hurtling round in the orbits close to Earth. | 0:26:48 | 0:26:51 | |
'How about just one more check on the reel?' | 0:26:51 | 0:26:54 | |
Most of them don't present any threat to the space station. | 0:26:54 | 0:26:59 | |
But they do to the people who live and work up there... | 0:26:59 | 0:27:02 | |
..the astronauts. | 0:27:04 | 0:27:06 | |
For emergency doctor Kevin Fong, | 0:27:18 | 0:27:20 | |
who worked at Nasa in their human spaceflight programme, | 0:27:20 | 0:27:24 | |
astronauts are at their most vulnerable on the spacewalk. | 0:27:24 | 0:27:28 | |
'OK, we checked all four systems.' | 0:27:33 | 0:27:36 | |
'Modulation all four and clean with the go.' | 0:27:38 | 0:27:40 | |
These guys are out there tumbling around the Earth | 0:27:42 | 0:27:45 | |
holding onto the space station, | 0:27:45 | 0:27:47 | |
travelling at 17,500 miles an hour | 0:27:47 | 0:27:50 | |
250 miles off the ground | 0:27:50 | 0:27:53 | |
with nothing between them and death | 0:27:53 | 0:27:55 | |
but this multilayered suit and a visor. | 0:27:55 | 0:27:57 | |
I mean, that's... that's walking in space. | 0:27:57 | 0:28:01 | |
'Oh, my goodness, something's fallen out.' | 0:28:01 | 0:28:04 | |
Throw space junk travelling at similar velocities into the mix | 0:28:06 | 0:28:09 | |
and the dangers start to get bigger. | 0:28:09 | 0:28:12 | |
At that speed, | 0:28:14 | 0:28:16 | |
something as small as a fleck of paint could be life-threatening. | 0:28:16 | 0:28:21 | |
Just how dangerous has been tested in this special lab | 0:28:25 | 0:28:28 | |
at the University of Kent. | 0:28:28 | 0:28:29 | |
This strange-looking assembly of pipes and tubes | 0:28:37 | 0:28:41 | |
is actually one of the most powerful guns in Britain. | 0:28:41 | 0:28:45 | |
It can fire objects at roughly ten times the speed of a bullet. | 0:28:49 | 0:28:54 | |
But today, they're not firing anything as big as a bullet. | 0:28:57 | 0:29:01 | |
This tiny one-millimetre steel ball is what most space junk looks like. | 0:29:06 | 0:29:11 | |
In space, small is what's frequent. Large is not very common. | 0:29:12 | 0:29:16 | |
The ball wrapped in wax | 0:29:23 | 0:29:25 | |
and similar in size to a tiny piece of debris | 0:29:25 | 0:29:28 | |
or a fleck of hardened paint is loaded. | 0:29:28 | 0:29:31 | |
It's the most likely kind of thing to hit an astronaut on a spacewalk. | 0:29:34 | 0:29:39 | |
'237 in lift.' | 0:29:42 | 0:29:44 | |
'OK, I am ready to receive it.' | 0:29:44 | 0:29:47 | |
One of the most vulnerable parts of the spacesuit | 0:29:49 | 0:29:52 | |
is the astronaut's visor. | 0:29:52 | 0:29:55 | |
This is a piece of plastic, a polycarbonate, | 0:29:58 | 0:30:01 | |
which is typically used in space, | 0:30:01 | 0:30:03 | |
for example as a shield across the visor of the helmet | 0:30:03 | 0:30:06 | |
an astronaut might wear. | 0:30:06 | 0:30:08 | |
So he'd be looking out through it, protecting him from the environment. | 0:30:08 | 0:30:11 | |
What we're going to do with it here is we are going to put it in the gun | 0:30:11 | 0:30:14 | |
and fire one of our very small particles at 14,000 miles an hour towards it. | 0:30:14 | 0:30:18 | |
The polycarbonate is the same thickness as the visor. | 0:30:23 | 0:30:26 | |
So would the visor survive? | 0:30:37 | 0:30:39 | |
So this is our polycarbonate after the impact experiment. | 0:30:43 | 0:30:47 | |
So our one-millimetre object travelling at 14,000mph | 0:30:47 | 0:30:51 | |
has punched straight through the front. | 0:30:51 | 0:30:54 | |
At the back, there's a slightly larger whole. | 0:30:54 | 0:30:56 | |
So it's gone through and removed material from the rear surface. | 0:30:56 | 0:30:59 | |
And that's kept on going and hit what's on the far side, | 0:30:59 | 0:31:01 | |
potentially an astronaut. | 0:31:01 | 0:31:03 | |
'OK to go. I have my gate closed and locked.' | 0:31:05 | 0:31:08 | |
'With that you are go to release the cutters from the internal bearing.' | 0:31:09 | 0:31:13 | |
The visor's going to be almost non-existent as an obstacle. | 0:31:14 | 0:31:17 | |
The tiny amount of that energy, | 0:31:19 | 0:31:21 | |
a fraction of that energy that particle has gets taken up by shattering the visor. | 0:31:21 | 0:31:24 | |
And in terms of what it would look like to the astronaut, | 0:31:24 | 0:31:27 | |
well, it's probably going to be the last thing that they see. | 0:31:27 | 0:31:29 | |
The energy contained within a single fleck of paint | 0:31:33 | 0:31:36 | |
travelling at these enormous velocities, | 0:31:36 | 0:31:38 | |
it is much more akin to the energy you see | 0:31:38 | 0:31:41 | |
contained within a high explosive. | 0:31:41 | 0:31:43 | |
For astronauts like Jim Reilly, who's walked in space five times, | 0:31:54 | 0:31:58 | |
the dangers of space junk are part of the job. | 0:31:58 | 0:32:01 | |
You know, at some point, you get hit by something of any size, | 0:32:04 | 0:32:07 | |
it's pretty much game over. | 0:32:07 | 0:32:09 | |
But, you know, we accept those risks even here on Earth. | 0:32:09 | 0:32:12 | |
You know, you can get hit by a bus and it's just, it's your day, right? | 0:32:12 | 0:32:16 | |
So you accept that. | 0:32:16 | 0:32:18 | |
'Good to go to close the thermal hatch.' | 0:32:18 | 0:32:20 | |
Of course, the astronaut's suit | 0:32:20 | 0:32:22 | |
presents a much bigger target than the visor. | 0:32:22 | 0:32:24 | |
But that's more protected. | 0:32:24 | 0:32:26 | |
'Get all the routing back to the structure itself. | 0:32:26 | 0:32:29 | |
'Are you good on that?' | 0:32:29 | 0:32:32 | |
It has a layering system that helps slow down any small objects | 0:32:32 | 0:32:35 | |
that might pierce the fabric. | 0:32:35 | 0:32:37 | |
And it also has a built-in safety mechanism. | 0:32:39 | 0:32:41 | |
The suit can sustain a hole somewhere between an eighth and a quarter of an inch | 0:32:43 | 0:32:48 | |
and that will still have enough volume within the oxygen tanks | 0:32:48 | 0:32:51 | |
to give you about 15 minutes to get back into the airlock. | 0:32:51 | 0:32:55 | |
The problem on the station, though, is that you can be 15 minutes away and further | 0:32:55 | 0:32:59 | |
when you're doing some of your work. | 0:32:59 | 0:33:01 | |
'Your left hand is off just now.' | 0:33:04 | 0:33:05 | |
'OK, captain, complete.' | 0:33:09 | 0:33:12 | |
ASTRONAUTS TALK INDISTINCTLY | 0:33:14 | 0:33:17 | |
Spacesuit is kind of a bit of a misnomer. | 0:33:19 | 0:33:23 | |
It's not a suit. | 0:33:23 | 0:33:24 | |
It's the world's smallest spacecraft. | 0:33:24 | 0:33:27 | |
You depend upon it entirely for your life, | 0:33:29 | 0:33:32 | |
because inside that suit is an atmosphere that you can breathe, | 0:33:32 | 0:33:35 | |
a warmth enough to keep you alive | 0:33:35 | 0:33:39 | |
and something that can repel heat when it's out there. | 0:33:39 | 0:33:43 | |
FEMALE ASTRONAUT SPEAKS INDISTINCTLY | 0:33:43 | 0:33:48 | |
And it all looks great and it all looks nice and floaty. | 0:33:49 | 0:33:52 | |
But actually these are some of the most terrifying moments | 0:33:52 | 0:33:54 | |
in all of human space exploration. | 0:33:54 | 0:33:56 | |
This is the maximum exposure that an individual can have out there. | 0:33:56 | 0:34:00 | |
This is where they are stripped of all of the protections | 0:34:00 | 0:34:03 | |
that have been engineered over years. | 0:34:03 | 0:34:06 | |
It's hard to think of an environment or a situation | 0:34:08 | 0:34:11 | |
in which you would be more vulnerable. | 0:34:11 | 0:34:13 | |
MALE ASTRONAUT SPEAKS INDISTINCTLY | 0:34:13 | 0:34:18 | |
Up till now, no astronaut has ever come to grief in a spacewalk. | 0:34:21 | 0:34:25 | |
But for some scientists, the past is no guide to the future. | 0:34:28 | 0:34:33 | |
When the space age started, Nasa designed the spacesuits | 0:34:33 | 0:34:37 | |
so that the astronauts could survive impacts of very small dust. | 0:34:37 | 0:34:41 | |
But as the space age has gone on and bits of paint are flaked away from the outside of spacecraft | 0:34:41 | 0:34:46 | |
or sometimes a disused satellite explodes and showers space with very fine debris, | 0:34:46 | 0:34:51 | |
there is more and more debris about the size we've been shooting here today. | 0:34:51 | 0:34:55 | |
Sooner or later in the next decade or two, | 0:34:55 | 0:34:57 | |
an astronaut will be struck by something this size. | 0:34:57 | 0:35:00 | |
But maybe in the future, | 0:35:07 | 0:35:09 | |
people won't have to risk their lives on the final frontier. | 0:35:09 | 0:35:12 | |
At the European Space Agency's lab in Holland, | 0:35:15 | 0:35:19 | |
Dr Andre Schiele is suiting up | 0:35:19 | 0:35:22 | |
to test the next generation of astronaut. | 0:35:22 | 0:35:24 | |
He's wearing a high-tech sleeve, | 0:35:31 | 0:35:33 | |
which is remotely linked to a robot arm. | 0:35:33 | 0:35:35 | |
Every movement he makes with his hand and arm | 0:35:37 | 0:35:40 | |
is mimicked by the robot. | 0:35:40 | 0:35:42 | |
In space, it's a very hostile environment for humans to be | 0:35:45 | 0:35:49 | |
for several reasons. | 0:35:49 | 0:35:51 | |
There is debris that can hit astronauts | 0:35:51 | 0:35:53 | |
when they are doing activities outside. | 0:35:53 | 0:35:55 | |
If a robotic system is struck by a small part, | 0:35:55 | 0:35:58 | |
it will probably break, | 0:35:58 | 0:35:59 | |
but we are not facing life loss. | 0:35:59 | 0:36:02 | |
So it is much safer to do this | 0:36:02 | 0:36:04 | |
and we can actually control those robotic systems | 0:36:04 | 0:36:06 | |
from either inside the safe and shielded environment of the space station | 0:36:06 | 0:36:10 | |
or even from the ground. | 0:36:10 | 0:36:12 | |
This cutting-edge technology is still being developed | 0:36:14 | 0:36:17 | |
and won't come online for a number of years. | 0:36:17 | 0:36:20 | |
But even when it does, | 0:36:20 | 0:36:22 | |
Dr Schiele doesn't envisage replacing humans in space. | 0:36:22 | 0:36:25 | |
We strongly believe at Esa | 0:36:28 | 0:36:30 | |
that the combination of astronauts and robots | 0:36:30 | 0:36:33 | |
can be the most powerful one. | 0:36:33 | 0:36:35 | |
Where not one replaces the other, | 0:36:35 | 0:36:38 | |
but every system exploits its optimal characteristics. | 0:36:38 | 0:36:41 | |
So a robot is very good at repeating tasks, | 0:36:43 | 0:36:45 | |
at doing tasks in very hostile environments. | 0:36:45 | 0:36:48 | |
And humans are very good at planning tasks, | 0:36:48 | 0:36:50 | |
at understanding random situations. | 0:36:50 | 0:36:53 | |
So with the system that we show here, in the telerobotics lab at Esa, | 0:36:53 | 0:36:57 | |
we are combining the human intelligence | 0:36:57 | 0:36:59 | |
with the preferences of a robotic manipulator by tele manipulation. | 0:36:59 | 0:37:04 | |
But orbital debris threatens life on Earth as well as in space. | 0:37:15 | 0:37:19 | |
And that's because modern life | 0:37:22 | 0:37:24 | |
is increasingly dependent on satellite technology... | 0:37:24 | 0:37:28 | |
..from GPS | 0:37:31 | 0:37:33 | |
to television | 0:37:33 | 0:37:36 | |
to the weather forecast. | 0:37:36 | 0:37:38 | |
And in the future, | 0:37:39 | 0:37:41 | |
we're only going to get more dependent on space technology. | 0:37:41 | 0:37:44 | |
Our use of space is going to grow. | 0:37:49 | 0:37:52 | |
We're already relying on many services | 0:37:52 | 0:37:55 | |
that are provided by satellites already. | 0:37:55 | 0:37:58 | |
That situation is unlikely to change. | 0:37:58 | 0:38:00 | |
You know, we're only going to place more demands | 0:38:00 | 0:38:03 | |
on satellites into the future. | 0:38:03 | 0:38:06 | |
And, you know, if that happens in combination with a growing debris problem, | 0:38:06 | 0:38:11 | |
then there're going to be issues arising. | 0:38:11 | 0:38:14 | |
And that debris problem could be about to get worse. | 0:38:18 | 0:38:21 | |
Scientists have only recently begun to understand the risks | 0:38:22 | 0:38:26 | |
of 17 old Russian SL-16 rocket bodies | 0:38:26 | 0:38:30 | |
orbiting within 50km of each other. | 0:38:30 | 0:38:32 | |
They're big. About the size of a railway carriage. | 0:38:38 | 0:38:41 | |
We showed that there is a one in 400 chance over the next ten years | 0:38:43 | 0:38:47 | |
of two of those SL-16 rocket bodies colliding. | 0:38:47 | 0:38:52 | |
So you may ask, that doesn't sound like that's too bad. | 0:38:55 | 0:38:58 | |
I'm not sure how many of you would go and take the subway tomorrow into work | 0:38:58 | 0:39:02 | |
if there is a one in 400 chance that that subway wasn't going to make it into work. | 0:39:02 | 0:39:06 | |
So far, those old rocket bodies haven't come close to each other. | 0:39:11 | 0:39:16 | |
But could there be an even greater danger | 0:39:19 | 0:39:22 | |
threatening our dependence on space? | 0:39:22 | 0:39:26 | |
What I'm really more concerned about is kind of like the canary in the mine. | 0:39:26 | 0:39:29 | |
I don't care about the big breakups. | 0:39:29 | 0:39:32 | |
I care about the satellites that are failing for unknown reasons | 0:39:32 | 0:39:35 | |
because, statistically, you know you have many more | 0:39:35 | 0:39:39 | |
of the lethal, non-trackable objects | 0:39:39 | 0:39:41 | |
than you do of the trackable fragments | 0:39:41 | 0:39:44 | |
that are going to break things up. | 0:39:44 | 0:39:46 | |
So what a precursor should be, | 0:39:46 | 0:39:48 | |
an indicator that we're getting close to the Kessler Syndrome | 0:39:48 | 0:39:51 | |
is that we have many more satellites that have anomalies for unknown reasons. | 0:39:51 | 0:39:55 | |
'It's coming off. Go for deploy.' | 0:39:55 | 0:39:58 | |
'Oh, roger. Liftoff and the clock is started.' | 0:40:01 | 0:40:04 | |
This huge satellite was built in Britain in 2002... | 0:40:13 | 0:40:17 | |
..for the European Space Agency. | 0:40:19 | 0:40:21 | |
LAUNCH COUNTDOWN IN FRENCH | 0:40:24 | 0:40:28 | |
It was the largest civilian Earth observation satellite | 0:40:32 | 0:40:35 | |
ever fired into space. | 0:40:35 | 0:40:37 | |
And it was very successful. | 0:40:38 | 0:40:41 | |
But in April 2012... | 0:40:43 | 0:40:45 | |
..it suddenly stopped working. | 0:40:47 | 0:40:50 | |
So all of a sudden it went from generating huge amounts of data for scientists down on the ground | 0:40:55 | 0:41:00 | |
to basically one of the biggest pieces of junk that we see on orbit. | 0:41:00 | 0:41:03 | |
Some scientists suspect Envisat | 0:41:04 | 0:41:07 | |
might have been disabled by space junk. | 0:41:07 | 0:41:10 | |
Sometimes there is no clear indication and it's just a suspicion | 0:41:12 | 0:41:16 | |
that smaller particles have impacted the satellite and done some damage. | 0:41:16 | 0:41:20 | |
You can cut a cable easily or you can damage some structural parts. | 0:41:20 | 0:41:25 | |
So it certainly will happen. And it has happened in space. | 0:41:25 | 0:41:28 | |
Envisat is now hurtling around the world at over 7km per second, | 0:41:32 | 0:41:38 | |
in the same orbit as all of the other Earth observational satellites. | 0:41:38 | 0:41:43 | |
But the much greater threat of a collision with some junk | 0:41:46 | 0:41:50 | |
was highlighted when scientists built a computer model of its path | 0:41:50 | 0:41:53 | |
through the largest debris field. | 0:41:53 | 0:41:55 | |
So what we're seeing here, | 0:41:57 | 0:41:58 | |
this is the view from Envisat as it's travelling around the Earth. | 0:41:58 | 0:42:02 | |
These are all the other debris objects that we can currently track from the ground. | 0:42:02 | 0:42:06 | |
As we're moving along the orbit here, | 0:42:06 | 0:42:09 | |
what you see is there are plenty of objects that are passing in front of Envisat. | 0:42:09 | 0:42:15 | |
In some cases, passing right next to Envisat. | 0:42:15 | 0:42:17 | |
Now, when we get to the poles like this, | 0:42:18 | 0:42:21 | |
you can see just how crowded the environment actually is. | 0:42:21 | 0:42:25 | |
And Envisat is just going through that now without any kind of control. | 0:42:25 | 0:42:28 | |
So there's no way it can manoeuvre to avoid any collision. | 0:42:28 | 0:42:32 | |
You know, some of these things passing at 14km per second. | 0:42:32 | 0:42:36 | |
Huge amounts of energy's involved. | 0:42:36 | 0:42:38 | |
Removing Envisat from its dangerous orbit | 0:42:49 | 0:42:52 | |
is obviously a pressing problem. | 0:42:52 | 0:42:54 | |
The satellite company Airbus | 0:42:56 | 0:42:58 | |
is at the forefront of the race against time | 0:42:58 | 0:43:01 | |
to bring Envisat back to Earth. | 0:43:01 | 0:43:04 | |
They build some of the world's most sophisticated and complex satellites | 0:43:08 | 0:43:13 | |
in their high-tech clean rooms. | 0:43:13 | 0:43:16 | |
But they're figuring out how to solve the Envisat problem | 0:43:16 | 0:43:20 | |
in much more humble surroundings... | 0:43:20 | 0:43:22 | |
..the company's converted bike shed. | 0:43:24 | 0:43:26 | |
And what they've come up with is deceptively simple. | 0:43:28 | 0:43:33 | |
They plan to harpoon it. | 0:43:40 | 0:43:42 | |
This demonstration allows us to prove that we can target a small object, | 0:43:43 | 0:43:47 | |
a very lightweight object very accurately. | 0:43:47 | 0:43:51 | |
If we can do that, then we can certainly go and capture very big objects and very heavy objects, | 0:43:51 | 0:43:57 | |
which is essentially the main targets that we want to capture. | 0:43:57 | 0:44:01 | |
They hope to launch a chaser satellite, | 0:44:10 | 0:44:13 | |
which would carefully approach Envisat | 0:44:13 | 0:44:16 | |
or any other defunct satellite | 0:44:16 | 0:44:18 | |
and then fire the harpoon. | 0:44:18 | 0:44:20 | |
So this system will capture those items of debris, | 0:44:24 | 0:44:29 | |
tow them out of the orbits where they might collide with active satellites | 0:44:29 | 0:44:35 | |
and allow them to burn up safely in the atmosphere. | 0:44:35 | 0:44:39 | |
So the idea is to have a system which takes them away from where they cause a problem | 0:44:40 | 0:44:45 | |
and basically destroy them safely. | 0:44:45 | 0:44:48 | |
It sounds great in theory, | 0:44:54 | 0:44:56 | |
but it may not be easy in practice. | 0:44:56 | 0:44:58 | |
You're firing something, it's going to be travelling pretty quickly. | 0:45:01 | 0:45:04 | |
It's going to hit the other spacecraft. | 0:45:04 | 0:45:07 | |
OK? And that's kind of the situation that we're trying to avoid in the first place. | 0:45:07 | 0:45:10 | |
We're artificially generating a collision here. | 0:45:10 | 0:45:13 | |
The whole point of this spacecraft, | 0:45:13 | 0:45:16 | |
of, you know, removing that big junk | 0:45:16 | 0:45:19 | |
is that we reduce the number of objects that we have on orbit. | 0:45:19 | 0:45:22 | |
So we don't want to be generating any new debris. | 0:45:22 | 0:45:25 | |
The harpoon strike could have a much bigger unintended impact. | 0:45:32 | 0:45:35 | |
Where on that spacecraft are you going to fire your harpoon? | 0:45:39 | 0:45:42 | |
There are all sorts of things inside there that, | 0:45:42 | 0:45:44 | |
you know, potentially you can have problems with. | 0:45:44 | 0:45:47 | |
On the inside of the satellite, we have things like propulsion lines, | 0:45:48 | 0:45:52 | |
which you can see here, which carry the propellant for the thrusters. | 0:45:52 | 0:45:56 | |
And electronics boxes and various other bits of equipment. | 0:45:56 | 0:46:00 | |
So when we punch through this panel, | 0:46:00 | 0:46:02 | |
we need to take into account that there might be this sort of equipment on the other side. | 0:46:02 | 0:46:08 | |
Hitting the extremely volatile propellant with a harpoon | 0:46:10 | 0:46:13 | |
would almost certainly cause an explosion. | 0:46:13 | 0:46:16 | |
So Dr Jamie Reid and his colleagues | 0:46:18 | 0:46:20 | |
have been poring over the blueprints of Envisat | 0:46:20 | 0:46:23 | |
to make sure they can target | 0:46:23 | 0:46:25 | |
precisely where they want the harpoon to land. | 0:46:25 | 0:46:28 | |
But there's a final obstacle that might prove insurmountable. | 0:46:35 | 0:46:40 | |
This is a pretty big spacecraft. | 0:46:40 | 0:46:43 | |
It needs to be big because we're kind of manhandling this one. | 0:46:43 | 0:46:46 | |
You know, you're not going to send a mouse to grab an elephant. | 0:46:46 | 0:46:49 | |
So this spacecraft is big. | 0:46:49 | 0:46:50 | |
That means it's going to go onto a big rocket. | 0:46:50 | 0:46:53 | |
And that rocket is going to cost a lot of money. | 0:46:53 | 0:46:56 | |
So we've invested huge amounts of money into this. | 0:46:56 | 0:46:58 | |
And its job, essentially, is to grab a bit of junk and then burn it up. | 0:46:58 | 0:47:03 | |
You know, so it's not really performing any science, anything else. | 0:47:03 | 0:47:06 | |
That's what its job is for and we're spending huge amounts of money to do that. | 0:47:06 | 0:47:10 | |
It's certainly true that if you had one satellite | 0:47:11 | 0:47:14 | |
to go and catch one piece of debris, it would be very inefficient. | 0:47:14 | 0:47:18 | |
So the advantage of the harpoon design | 0:47:18 | 0:47:20 | |
is we can have one chaser satellite | 0:47:20 | 0:47:22 | |
that has lots of different harpoons on it | 0:47:22 | 0:47:24 | |
and it can go and capture multiple pieces of debris. | 0:47:24 | 0:47:27 | |
There are other plans to remove defunct satellites, | 0:47:41 | 0:47:44 | |
including capturing them in a net... | 0:47:44 | 0:47:47 | |
..sticking a magnetic thruster onto the body... | 0:47:49 | 0:47:51 | |
..physically grabbing drifting spacecraft... | 0:47:53 | 0:47:56 | |
..firing a laser beam to change their orbit... | 0:47:57 | 0:48:00 | |
..and even using solar radiation to sail them off to safety. | 0:48:01 | 0:48:05 | |
But the debris problem is so huge | 0:48:09 | 0:48:12 | |
that it might be beyond all of these solutions. | 0:48:12 | 0:48:15 | |
If I take off a certain number of objects over a certain period of time, | 0:48:16 | 0:48:19 | |
I'm going to reduce the probability of collision. | 0:48:19 | 0:48:22 | |
Unfortunately, from the analysis that's been done, | 0:48:22 | 0:48:25 | |
it's about 35 to 50 removals to prevent one collision. | 0:48:25 | 0:48:29 | |
That's not great, right? | 0:48:31 | 0:48:32 | |
A lot of people think, "I remove one object, I've stopped one breakup." | 0:48:32 | 0:48:36 | |
That is not the way it's going to work. | 0:48:36 | 0:48:38 | |
It's statistical in nature, it's being very proactive. | 0:48:38 | 0:48:41 | |
It doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. But it's not one for one. | 0:48:41 | 0:48:44 | |
It's going to be a huge, huge cost. | 0:48:46 | 0:48:48 | |
Do we spend the money on removing all these objects? | 0:48:48 | 0:48:52 | |
Or let's not spend the money. | 0:48:52 | 0:48:54 | |
Let's leave all the objects in orbit | 0:48:54 | 0:48:56 | |
and then we take the risk that some of those are going to be hit, | 0:48:56 | 0:48:59 | |
they're going to generate more fragments | 0:48:59 | 0:49:01 | |
and we end up in the situation where, you know, | 0:49:01 | 0:49:04 | |
Earth orbit is completely congested, | 0:49:04 | 0:49:06 | |
full of fragments and we can't launch new space missions. | 0:49:06 | 0:49:09 | |
Of course, satellites continue to be launched at about 120 a year. | 0:49:17 | 0:49:21 | |
But that's not what has scientists most concerned. | 0:49:25 | 0:49:28 | |
They're worried about these things. | 0:49:32 | 0:49:35 | |
CubeSats. | 0:49:35 | 0:49:37 | |
They're far cheaper than your conventional large spacecraft. | 0:49:39 | 0:49:43 | |
And what that means is we can put up more of these | 0:49:43 | 0:49:46 | |
and they can perform the kind of space missions | 0:49:46 | 0:49:48 | |
that we wouldn't be able to contemplate with a larger spacecraft. | 0:49:48 | 0:49:51 | |
What helps keep the cost down is that they're so small | 0:49:54 | 0:49:57 | |
they can be launched as part of the payload of a bigger satellite | 0:49:57 | 0:50:00 | |
or even from the space station. | 0:50:00 | 0:50:03 | |
They're quite simply thrown into orbit. | 0:50:03 | 0:50:06 | |
The disadvantage is that they're not manoeuvrable. | 0:50:07 | 0:50:10 | |
In the end, the problem is similar to a collision, if you like. | 0:50:13 | 0:50:17 | |
The release event of these objects | 0:50:17 | 0:50:19 | |
is more or less identical | 0:50:19 | 0:50:22 | |
to the large release of a cloud of fragments, | 0:50:22 | 0:50:25 | |
because these CubeSats are not manoeuvrable. | 0:50:25 | 0:50:28 | |
They cannot avoid collisions. | 0:50:28 | 0:50:30 | |
Even though the CubeSat is small, | 0:50:32 | 0:50:35 | |
there's is probably sufficient mass in here | 0:50:35 | 0:50:37 | |
that if it was to hit a larger spacecraft, | 0:50:37 | 0:50:40 | |
you know, at 10km per second, | 0:50:40 | 0:50:43 | |
it would cause a catastrophic breakup of that spacecraft. | 0:50:43 | 0:50:46 | |
You know, the mass of these could be | 0:50:46 | 0:50:48 | |
anywhere between 3kg all the way up to 20kg | 0:50:48 | 0:50:51 | |
and that's enough mass | 0:50:51 | 0:50:53 | |
to completely destroy a satellite like Envisat. | 0:50:53 | 0:50:57 | |
Around 100 of these mini satellites were launched in 2014. | 0:51:06 | 0:51:10 | |
And that number is only set to increase. | 0:51:10 | 0:51:14 | |
There is no law governing space operations | 0:51:20 | 0:51:22 | |
and that's primarily because space isn't divided up by national boundaries. | 0:51:22 | 0:51:27 | |
Space, in the end, is a resource. It needs to be shared globally. | 0:51:29 | 0:51:33 | |
There is no space above your country that you can reserve. | 0:51:33 | 0:51:36 | |
Spaceflight happens by orbiting around the full Earth. | 0:51:36 | 0:51:39 | |
So you have to share the whole space. | 0:51:41 | 0:51:44 | |
You need to have consensus globally | 0:51:44 | 0:51:47 | |
on what we do with this precious space. | 0:51:47 | 0:51:51 | |
Consensus isn't always possible to achieve. | 0:52:02 | 0:52:07 | |
So the United States, the most powerful spacefaring nation, | 0:52:08 | 0:52:13 | |
is taking matters into its own hands. | 0:52:13 | 0:52:16 | |
It's not going to break the bank by investing in unproven technology | 0:52:26 | 0:52:30 | |
to clean up the debris problem. | 0:52:30 | 0:52:32 | |
But the Federal Government is spending a billion dollars | 0:52:33 | 0:52:36 | |
on a new tracking system called Space Fence. | 0:52:36 | 0:52:40 | |
Space Fence will provide the capability | 0:52:46 | 0:52:49 | |
to detect, track and catalogue objects | 0:52:49 | 0:52:52 | |
all the way from the baseball size | 0:52:52 | 0:52:55 | |
down to sort of marble size, | 0:52:55 | 0:52:57 | |
depending on the altitude. | 0:52:57 | 0:52:59 | |
So instead of just tracking 22,000 large objects, | 0:53:02 | 0:53:06 | |
Space Fence will now allow the Space Surveillance Network | 0:53:06 | 0:53:09 | |
to track up to 200,000 much smaller objects. | 0:53:09 | 0:53:14 | |
To be honest, a lot of people would say, | 0:53:20 | 0:53:23 | |
"Well, let's just put our head in the sand and ignore the problem." | 0:53:23 | 0:53:26 | |
Well, that's just an irresponsible way to look at the problem. | 0:53:26 | 0:53:30 | |
If you can see that debris and if you can avoid that debris, | 0:53:30 | 0:53:32 | |
you need to do everything you can to do that. | 0:53:32 | 0:53:34 | |
Because every one of those events that is a collision | 0:53:34 | 0:53:38 | |
creates thousands of other pieces of debris now that you have to track. | 0:53:38 | 0:53:41 | |
This new system is called Space Fence | 0:53:43 | 0:53:45 | |
because it produces a fence-like radar beam. | 0:53:45 | 0:53:48 | |
It's the size of the radar and the huge increase in its frequency | 0:53:49 | 0:53:53 | |
that allows it to track much smaller objects. | 0:53:53 | 0:53:57 | |
When an object crosses that fence, we detect it. | 0:53:57 | 0:54:01 | |
And then we can electronically steer this energy | 0:54:01 | 0:54:05 | |
so that we can track it very precisely. | 0:54:05 | 0:54:09 | |
And then once you develop a track on it, | 0:54:09 | 0:54:13 | |
at that point I can then use physics | 0:54:13 | 0:54:16 | |
to predict where it's going to be in the future. | 0:54:16 | 0:54:18 | |
So every time the object goes over the site, | 0:54:18 | 0:54:22 | |
we would then collect more information on it, more data, | 0:54:22 | 0:54:25 | |
which allows us to refine the estimate of where it is at, | 0:54:25 | 0:54:29 | |
again, so that we can predict where it's going to be in the future. | 0:54:29 | 0:54:31 | |
But there are limitations to this system. | 0:54:44 | 0:54:46 | |
There are millions of objects of varying sizes orbiting Earth, | 0:54:48 | 0:54:52 | |
but it's only the thousand or so operational satellites | 0:54:52 | 0:54:55 | |
that can be moved to avoid a collision. | 0:54:55 | 0:54:58 | |
So even with the latest technology, | 0:55:06 | 0:55:10 | |
can science make any worthwhile predictions | 0:55:10 | 0:55:12 | |
about what might happen in the future? | 0:55:12 | 0:55:15 | |
What I expect is going to happen is not going to be at all | 0:55:15 | 0:55:18 | |
what anybody else that you're going to film is going to say. | 0:55:18 | 0:55:21 | |
Because I don't know what the answer is. | 0:55:21 | 0:55:23 | |
So I'm just going to tell you you have to live with ambiguity | 0:55:23 | 0:55:26 | |
and I believe that it will not unfold | 0:55:26 | 0:55:30 | |
in a predictable, linear, consistent way from anyway that we believe. | 0:55:30 | 0:55:36 | |
It's going to be sporadic and it's going to be unpredictable | 0:55:36 | 0:55:40 | |
and we're all going to act surprised | 0:55:40 | 0:55:43 | |
and myself and Don Kessler and Hugh Lewis are going to go back and go, | 0:55:43 | 0:55:46 | |
"The variance is large. We told you." | 0:55:46 | 0:55:49 | |
MALE ASTRONAUT TALKS INDISTINCTLY | 0:55:53 | 0:55:56 | |
'Right, that looks like it's in there.' | 0:55:57 | 0:56:00 | |
If Kessler's calculations about the increase in the debris problem are right, | 0:56:05 | 0:56:10 | |
and so far they have been, | 0:56:10 | 0:56:12 | |
then scientists forecast that this is what the orbits around Earth | 0:56:12 | 0:56:15 | |
will look like in the next few centuries. | 0:56:15 | 0:56:18 | |
'OK, I am ready to receive it.' | 0:56:25 | 0:56:27 | |
We're using space all the time. | 0:56:32 | 0:56:35 | |
You know, when we look into the future, that's only going to continue | 0:56:35 | 0:56:39 | |
and we're going to make more use of space. | 0:56:39 | 0:56:41 | |
'It did wiggle. | 0:56:41 | 0:56:43 | |
'To set that to be effective, | 0:56:43 | 0:56:47 | |
'it needs to be pointed forward.' | 0:56:47 | 0:56:50 | |
You know, if we are connected via space all the time, | 0:56:51 | 0:56:54 | |
then space becomes our single point of failure. | 0:56:54 | 0:56:57 | |
And we've got to tackle that problem. | 0:56:57 | 0:56:59 | |
But there are also idealistic | 0:57:08 | 0:57:11 | |
as well as practical reasons | 0:57:11 | 0:57:13 | |
for wanting to preserve our access | 0:57:13 | 0:57:15 | |
to what's now one of our most precious resources. | 0:57:15 | 0:57:20 | |
I want my kids and my kids' kids to be able to explore space. | 0:57:25 | 0:57:30 | |
And if we ruin the environment, we can't do that. | 0:57:30 | 0:57:34 | |
And that would be tragic, because my passion for space | 0:57:34 | 0:57:38 | |
came when I was ten years old and I watched Apollo 11 | 0:57:38 | 0:57:42 | |
and I watched Neil Armstrong walk on the moon | 0:57:42 | 0:57:44 | |
and that magic that created that feeling in me that said, | 0:57:44 | 0:57:48 | |
"I want to do space," | 0:57:48 | 0:57:50 | |
I want my kids and my kids' kids to have that opportunity. | 0:57:50 | 0:57:53 | |
And if the space environment is ruined, that will never happen. | 0:57:53 | 0:57:56 |