06/06/2017 100 Days+

Hello and welcome to One Hundred Days Plus.

In two days, Brits will vote in an election that was never

With just over one day of campaigning left,

this is a real contest with unpredictable results.

With the race tight, both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn

are in their final push with their final appeals to voters.

Every vote for me and the Conservatives is a vote to

strengthen my hand in those Brexit negotiations. People are determined

to show that this election can be won by Labour.

a third attacker is named and there are more questions about

Also it's another day of Donald Trump taking to Twitter.

The President weighs in on the escalating Qatar crisis -

saying that isolating the country could be the beginning of the end

A US Government contractor leaks a top-secret document from the NSA

and it promptly arrested - we'll look at the content

Hello, I am Katty Kay in Washington, Christian Fraser is in London.

Brits go to the polls in just over 24 hours and an election

that was all about Brexit has suddenly veered into security

and policing in the wake of Manchester and London.

Today third attacker was named as Rachid Redouane. Reports in the

Italian press suggest he tried to travel to Syria last year, but was

stopped by Italian police. UK officials say Youssef Zaghba was not

on their watch list. Authorities in the UK are reviewing their

intelligence. One man who thinks authorities

are going about it in the wrong Up until 10 days ago

he was the Chief Executive of the Association of Police

and Crime Commissioners. He was stopped from speaking

after the Manchester attack and so he resigned

so he could have his say. Do you think Muslim communities in

your view are taking enough ownership of this problem? Obviously

they're doing as much as they can, but there is more they could do.

That is what I have been trying to say. It is also an issue about the

state, by that I mean local authorities and local government,

are not doing. When it comes to the engagement, as you probably know

there is a deradicalisation programme, where people are referred

when they become aware of issues about a person and that is being

undermined and often deliberately by people. As a result people are being

deterred from reporting or signposting people for support and

assistance. There is an issue around community leadership, this is where

the problem lies with the state, the state tends to talk to the same

people and expect a different result and the communities, particularly

the Muslim community is very young, the majority is under 25, female and

from low income backgrounds, all the leaders the Government want to talk

to are male, middle class and over 40 or 50. So they have no real

understanding of what is going on in Muslim youth or teenagers or young

people and yet they are the ones who are allegedly coming up with

solutions to help the Government. The problems are complicated and

police and authorities have to triage, because so many people are

suspects, but talk about the solutions, you have ideas about who

authorities should be talking to in communities, they always say they're

talking to community leader, who could they talk to? The best work

that is happening in the United Kingdom is Muslim women's groups and

Muslim women generally. The groups operate with very little funding and

they have access to families and are engaged in communities and not only

working on this, but other issues. When they come across a young man or

woman who might be being radicalised or questioning their identity, they

sit down and work with that person for nothing and ensure the person

has support. To my mind, as a doctor I know who works as a GP and in the

evening he will spend time working with young girls, maybing them

understand what they can -- making them understand what they can

achieve in this country. That work is happening under the radar and

being done for nothing. But we are expending millions on so-called

community leaders who are very good at talking the talk and I have spent

many afternoons wasted sit around tables with them and at the end we

feel very much better, but the point is the solutions are not there. If

you tell your children that it is Haram to wear skirts or wrong to go

to concerts or to stand with women in mosques, should we be surprised

that young people adopt some of these more mill tants attitudes. --

militant attitudes. Most of this information is not coming from

parents, but from peers or online. But yes the whole of this, it is not

just one issue, I remember one parent after three children

disappeared to Syria, said he had done his duty and made sure his

daughter didn't go out clubbing, didn't go partying, studied and she

was up stairs. He had no sense of the fact she was in more danger

online than if she had been doing the other things. There is a

conversation that has to be happening. That isn't happening. It

is not as challenging as it could be around the rights of the female. I'm

in favour of a rights-based society, rather than a multicultural society.

Why weren't you allowed to speak out. Do you think there is

self-sensor ship going on or political correctness. If you ask

the police commissioner, the board who stopped me speaking, I live in

Manchester, the atrocity was very close to hand, I drop my son there

all the time. It is a very personal thing to me. A lot of people were

saying to me, I prosecuted terrorism cases and I have ex-- experience of

terrorism. People said, we don't want you to say anything, they were

justify that on the basis we are in an election campaign and what I

would say might be miscontrued party politically. But nothing I'm saying

is party political. But it is about the bigger picture of protecting our

society and communities and for whatever reasons they were ru' --

reluctant to let me speak and I walked out of day. The conversations

we are now having reflect what needs to be had. Thank you very joining

us. Having walked out the door, you walked into your studio. We are glad

you did. French police have shot

and injured a man outside the cathedral of Notre Dame,

after he attacked The French prosecutor's office

says it is being treated The area around the cathedral

has been cleared of French media reports

say the attacker was TRANSLATION: A person came up behind

a policeman armed with a hammer Another policeman

immediately reacted and The policeman is recovering

in hospital and the The incident is being looked

into by a prosecutor, as while the aggressor was attacking

the policeman, he said, "This is Interesting, I was watching the US

network respond to this and there is focus on Europe at the moment with

the terror attacks in the UK and the point I was making on Twitter, I was

surprised how much attention that incident in Paris and I'm not

belittling it, but it happens where the police are targeted by these

people, I was surprised how much attention was on that and how little

on the shooting of five people at a factory in Florida. Yes, that was a

disgruntled worker and there was almost no coverage and almost no

coverage of the fact that 150 people were Kimmed in a bomb -- killed in a

bombing in Kabul. It does seem to be, we don't know if it is terror

related, but these incidents, it is worth asking in the media how much

attention we should give these stories. That story has been wrapped

up and it is being investigated. I think we can draw a line under that

one. More stories have been

emerging of people in London Bridge on the

night of the attacks. Many people tried to

fight off the attackers, as they worked their way

through Borough market. Our Special Correspondent,

Lucy Manning has been hearing Well scratches to

the arms and hands. Stabbed in the side

of me stomach and chest. Roy Larner, football

fan, a man who took on the the terrorists

with I don't know why I did it,

but I went BLEEP back. And I was stopping them getting

into the restaurant to stop them attacking the children

and families in there. As I got him out the Black and Blue

the police were firing The police stopping

him getting, hurting any more people and from

being shot around me. I feel quite bad myself

doing what I did. Spaniard, Ignacio Echeverria,

also fought the three Shocking, you didn't

know what to do. Spaniard, Ignacio Echeverria,

also fought the three Shocking, you didn't

know what to do. He didn't want to be

fully identified. He didn't even think

of anything, he just jumped there with the skateboard

and started to fight with them. He was hitting

the terrorist with the Then the next thing I remember

I was trying to approach the group, but I realised they were having

massive knives and one of them

stabbed my friend. I saw the policeman

running to tackle them. But as soon as he got,

as soon as he got to the If the policeman in

that moment had a gun, Ignacio's family say

they're in pain. They're appealing to British

and Spanish authorities for I'm with Geoff Ho and this

guy's a real hero. Geoff Ho with friends sitting up

in his hospital bed. The stab wound on his

throat still visible. The journalist who used his martial

arts skills to tackle the terrorists I'm confident he is going

to do a lot better than he did no in No 1, but RJ Ward has

the skills and he is going In a statement, Mr Ho described how

he took on the the attackers. Terrible injuries for many,

the scars from fighting back. We remember the victims and the

people who behaved so bravely. Brits go to the polls in just over

24 hours and an election that was all about Brexit has

suddenly veered into security and policing in the wake

of Manchester and London. But on Thursday the decision

that is made by the British voters will have a huge impact on Britain's

future relationship with Europe. Will Theresa May get

the mandate she wants? Or will Labour take enough seats

to deny her the thumping Today there has been a frenetic

pace to the campaigning. Jeremy Corbyn has been in London

and Shropshire and tonight he's in Ladywood in Birmingham,

a safe Labour seat. The Prime Minister has been

in Lancashire, North Wales and in the past few minutes she has

arrived, closer to home, in Slough. Our political correspondent

Ben Wright has been following the Prime Minister

on the campaign trail today Slough has a Labour majority. Not a

seat you would expect Theresa May to be targeting? True. But this is a

campaign that is quietly very confident. There has been a closing

in the polls in the last couple of weeks, it feels and probably is a

tighter race than it was six weeks ago when Theresa May surprised the

UK and called the snap general election. But I feel within the Tory

camp they're sure this is going to be all right for them and they're

going to be returned with a bigger majority. How big is the question.

But last night I was up in a city called Bradford, a constituency

Bradford South, that the Conservative Party last won in 1918.

But a century later, Theresa May thinks she could take it and a big

reason is that even though there is a Labour majority of 6,500 there was

a very large vote for Brexit, for leaving the EU. And a partly called

Ukip did well in 2015 and the Conservative are confident in other

seats they can scoop up a lot of the Ukip votes, because Brexit is going

to happen. I know I have asked you that a and you won't tell me how

many seats you needs or the it to be a real victory. She is playing

offence and Labour seem to be playing defence, Jeremy Corbyn in

safe Labour seats today, what are they looking, is it internal numbers

they have or different polls from what we are seeing, something is

giving them that confidence. All parties do their own private

polling, I think private polling in Labour when I last checked with them

looked dire Tatlower end of their -- at the lower end of their

predictions and the Conservatives remain confident, although the

national swing may not look fantastic that, individual seats

will deliver the majority they're looking for and that made this

gamble worthwhile. Your question remains a pertinent one and it is

being asked. There is a big difference between her winning by 20

and winning by 90. There is a big difference for her personally and

what it gives her going into the Brexit negotiations in a few days.

She has just appeared behind me. Between 20 and 90, you have given

yourself a lot of latitude. That is quite a sweep stake. What is going

on, in these last couple of days, why is the Tory party in offence and

Labour on defence. Offence and defence, you have been in Washington

too long, they're on attack mode. I'm playing American football.

They're targeting Labour seats in the north-west and the north in

places like Leeds and Manchester and perhaps in the north east which has

been traditional Labour heartland. In the last election, they were not

expected to get a majority. They got a majority of 12. That was a big

surprise. Now at the start of the election they were a long way ahead

in the polls and you could understand why the Prime Minister

called the election. But she was probably thinking at about probably

up around 80 to a hundred majority. That is the concern, will she have

that majority to limit the role of some of the more hardline

backbenchers in her party. For Labour, they're focussing on safe

seats and some of the feeling in Westminster is they're trying to

increase the share of the vote and Jeremy Corbyn in particular, because

he does want to be forced to resign, rather than going after a hundred

seats from the Conservative to try and win. That is the feeling. We

will get an idea on Friday whether or not he has been successful. It

will be interesting. We will have to sthee. Some of the Labour Labour

critics looking at how much of a margin he gets with some scepticism.

I will get you a sweep stake on how many seats she will get in private.

The White House has been really unhappy about leaks ever

Now they've cracked down with their first arrest

A 25-year-old woman who worked as a contractor

The information Reality Winner has admitted leaking is that it

suggests Russia WAS trying to interfere with the actual

voting procedure - the machines and the software,

You might remember President Obama had expressed concerns that the poll

We are joined by New York Times reporter Adam Goldman.

We want to talk about the content of what was leaked and the White

House's reaction. The content, how critical is the information that

Reality Winner put out? You know, I don't think it necessarily is a

game-changer in terms of information. It provided important

contacts and we know the Russians continue to hack and interfere with

the election after President Obama had warned Russia to stop. But it

was useful. There is no surprise is there that this White House would

have as soon as it had the opportunity to find somebody leaking

information to the press arrest them and after all President Obama

prosecuted leakers as well? Sure, President Obama prosecuted twice the

number who had ever been prosecuted in its totality before him. So you

know, it is not a surprise that the justice department under the

leadership of Jeff Sessions and Ross Rosenstein will go after leakers and

the president has made it clear it is a priority. The question is how

far and how many do they do? There is no indication that they tilted

the election towards Trump, but there is evidence they tried if you

believe this leak. But would the administration have told us the NSA

had proof of these Russian attempts to hack had she not leaked the

information? Well, I mean, let's not for get the former director of

intelligence, who was in charge of the department of homeland security

put out a statement suggesting Russian interference and there was a

report in January that blamed the Russians for interfering in the

election. So you know, what she put out doesn't on a 20,000 foot level

change our understanding of what the Russians did. Thank you very much.

We get some good guests in London and that is great. Sometimes I feel

a bit left out. I'm not part of Washington club and I don't have the

access to the high fliers. So you what I have done? I have invited Ron

Christie here to London. You have lured him away. Ron, you traitor!

I'm part of Washington fraternity. He has been to Rome and to now he is

in London and is right here in the studio. Good the see you. He'll come

back to me. Don't worry. You're out of it. What do you think about this

leak? Is there any moral ambiguity to this? No, having top security

clearance there is no excuse for releasing materials, particularly

when you're a contractor, you take a special oath not to disclose

information and the fact she did and sent it to the mails, she is in

trouble. Ron, I insist on being part of conversation. You have noticed

the president has been tweeting and today put himself in the the row

between Arab nations and Qatar. Why is the president wading into

something that is incredibly diplomatically sensitive and you

have 11,000 US military personnel posted to Qatar, is this sensible?

No, it is baffling to me. Given the fact that he likes to conduct

business via Twitter as we always talk about, but to do something of

this magnitude and don't forget, the United States has its largest

military presence in Qatar. And we have the fifth fleet which has the

American navy in Bahrain, one country over. And for him to take

these sort of steps via Twitter to isolate the United States is

foolish. It is not smart. Not wise and now I don't understand how this

White House will pull itself out of this. The thing is, we had a load of

people yesterday who were close to the president saying you have got to

ignore what the president is saying on social media. It is not policy.

Have a look at what the Wall Street journal put its editorial today.

Which is the point we have made countless times on this programme.

No yes about it. If is were working in the White House and I'm not going

anywhere, I'm staying here, but if you were an aide, you to worry every

time the boss picks up his hand-held device that could up end the

policies. This is supposed to be about infrastructure. Yes but we are

talking about Twitter. Do you detect a difference this week, it seems the

tone of the tweets since the weekend and the London bombings, the

frequency of them, has stepped up. It smacks of a real sense of

grievance in the White House in the office of the president. No

question, having been here on Saturday and Sunday when the events

took place and see my president sending out those tweets, I thought

it was tone deaf at best and my friends in the administration threw

their arms up and there was an article saying the president has a

difficult time getting legal counsel and people to represent him not

knowing what the president may say or tweet. It comes down to the idea

of... In a way his paranoia about the popular vote. He is trying to

justify why he is there. He keeping sending out these tweet, he started

again on the fake media. It comes to his own insecurities. What else can

you say? If my wife was the only one there for my inauguration, I would

be happy, I wouldn't look at any other numbers. We know who is in

charge and it is not me. Christian and I would turn up. You know where

the love is by the way. I'm... Just come back to me. I'm coming back on

Thursday. Ron good to have you. You're watching 100 Days on BBC

News.