Browse content similar to Episode 1. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Your hospitals, your jobs and your vote, tonight live in Swansea it is | :00:08. | :00:11. | |
your chance to ask the leader. Good evening and welcome to the | :00:12. | :00:37. | |
National Museum in Swansea. For the first in our series Ask the Leader | :00:38. | :00:41. | |
ahead of the election on the 5th of May. Tonight we have an audience | :00:42. | :00:45. | |
with plenty of questions, a mixture of undecided voters as well as | :00:46. | :00:49. | |
supporters of each of the main parties, and you too can have your | :00:50. | :00:55. | |
say on social media, the #is Wales 2016, so please welcome the leader | :00:56. | :01:01. | |
of the Welsh Conservative Party Andrew RT Davies. | :01:02. | :01:06. | |
APPLAUSE Thank you. | :01:07. | :01:14. | |
And our first question this evening comes from Tracey Hopkins. Hello, | :01:15. | :01:20. | |
I'm a Port Talbot girl born and bred, my hotels and restaurants | :01:21. | :01:24. | |
employ it more than 200 people and my family has invested more than 2 | :01:25. | :01:28. | |
million over the last 20 years. If we can do this and show commitment | :01:29. | :01:32. | |
to Port Talbot why can't the UK Government? | :01:33. | :01:38. | |
APPLAUSE Thank you, Tracy, for your question. | :01:39. | :01:42. | |
It is by to the important we recognise steel as a vital part of | :01:43. | :01:47. | |
our economic profile. Sajid Javid, the Prime Minister and all | :01:48. | :01:51. | |
politicians in Westminster and the Welsh assembly have recognised the | :01:52. | :01:55. | |
importance of steel if we are to maintain a credible manufacturing | :01:56. | :01:58. | |
strategy in this country. So with that in mind what we've got to do is | :01:59. | :02:03. | |
create the space and security for purchasers to come forward, look at | :02:04. | :02:07. | |
what Tata Steel have put up for sale and make sure they purchased the | :02:08. | :02:12. | |
assets as a going concern. We cannot, we cannot allow a fire sale, | :02:13. | :02:17. | |
we cannot allow the assets to be stripped out of Port Talbot, and | :02:18. | :02:19. | |
above all we cannot allow Port Talbot, Trostre and others to shut, | :02:20. | :02:26. | |
we have to keep those works open and we have to make sure there is a | :02:27. | :02:29. | |
future for steel-making within Wales, and indeed within the United | :02:30. | :02:35. | |
Kingdom. I am 100% signed up to that agenda and I will work tirelessly to | :02:36. | :02:38. | |
make sure that that happens along with colleagues, irrespective of | :02:39. | :02:42. | |
whatever political party they are in, because this is bigger than | :02:43. | :02:47. | |
party politics, this should transcend the party boundaries and | :02:48. | :02:50. | |
we have to work collectively to secure that future, not put a | :02:51. | :02:54. | |
sticking plaster on the problem but put a long-term plan in place so | :02:55. | :03:00. | |
that Port Talbot and the other works have a future. Your government in | :03:01. | :03:07. | |
Westminster put 124 billion into the ailing out the banks. Why not | :03:08. | :03:10. | |
bailout steel? From what the Business Secretary has | :03:11. | :03:13. | |
said today he has ruled out nothing when it comes to supporting the | :03:14. | :03:17. | |
steel industry. He has been to Mumbai, he's been down to the plant | :03:18. | :03:21. | |
on two occasions to speak to the unions and speak to businesses in | :03:22. | :03:25. | |
the area and communities, and what we are committed to doing is making | :03:26. | :03:29. | |
sure there is a successful outcome to the proposals that been put | :03:30. | :03:39. | |
forward by Tata Steel. Tracey. The meeting was going on when your guy | :03:40. | :03:44. | |
was on a jolly to Australia with his family. He was on a business | :03:45. | :03:47. | |
mission, a trade mission out there. We are committed to working to make | :03:48. | :03:51. | |
sure there is a long-term future for the plant in Port Talbot, also | :03:52. | :03:56. | |
Trostre and others. Should he have been in Mumbai on that day? The | :03:57. | :04:01. | |
Welsh government were not in Mumbai either but two wrongs don't make a | :04:02. | :04:08. | |
right. Was it wrong? The Business Secretary and primers Minster worked | :04:09. | :04:10. | |
night and day leading up to the decision to make sure there wasn't a | :04:11. | :04:13. | |
fire sale. Should he have been there? To make sure the plants were | :04:14. | :04:18. | |
not closed overnight which was a real proposal from Tata Steel. The | :04:19. | :04:24. | |
lady in the top row. Why has the Government waited for crunch time? | :04:25. | :04:30. | |
Why have we had this cheap Chinese steel dumped here? I disagree they | :04:31. | :04:35. | |
have waited for crunch time, over ?50 million has been returned to | :04:36. | :04:39. | |
Tata Steel as one of the high energy users under the proposals brought | :04:40. | :04:42. | |
forward from the Westminster government. Greater use of public | :04:43. | :04:45. | |
procurement contracts have been brought forward. If you take | :04:46. | :04:51. | |
Crossrail, 100% Welsh steel has been used in Crossrail, public | :04:52. | :04:53. | |
procurement and British Railway board has to use as much steel as | :04:54. | :04:57. | |
possible sourced from the UK. But what we have to do is make sure we | :04:58. | :05:01. | |
give the protection to the UK steel industry against cheap imports. But | :05:02. | :05:07. | |
what we must not do is start another trade war on other products because | :05:08. | :05:11. | |
if we put tariffs in place that the Chinese suddenly say we will not buy | :05:12. | :05:15. | |
the Airbus claims from you and start a spiral down to the bottom, then | :05:16. | :05:20. | |
all of a sudden the 6000 jobs that depend on the other factories across | :05:21. | :05:22. | |
Wales including Airbus could come under threat. | :05:23. | :05:28. | |
What do you intend to do to bring energy prices down so that they can | :05:29. | :05:33. | |
make steel to compete with the world? | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
What has happened is the Chancellor has brought forward measures that as | :05:37. | :05:40. | |
I just said in response to the question, was that we have rebated | :05:41. | :05:44. | |
to Tata Steel and other steel users, in Tata's case ?50 million and ?180 | :05:45. | :05:50. | |
million in total since the changes came into effect on the 1st of | :05:51. | :05:54. | |
January. That is not the answer to my question, that is subsidies. I'm | :05:55. | :05:58. | |
asking what will you do to bring the cost of energy down. What we are | :05:59. | :06:04. | |
doing on energy pricing is to make sure that we have a level playing | :06:05. | :06:08. | |
field when we commissioned a mixed bag of energy production across the | :06:09. | :06:11. | |
United Kingdom. You believe in carbon taxes? What I believe in... | :06:12. | :06:18. | |
Do you believe in carbon taxes? We must have a mixed bag of energy | :06:19. | :06:22. | |
generation and not put all of our eggs in one basket. We cannot | :06:23. | :06:26. | |
support projects that are completely uneconomical and drive energy costs | :06:27. | :06:30. | |
up and we must be competitive with North America, for example, where | :06:31. | :06:33. | |
energy prices plummeted recently. We have seen the price of energy coming | :06:34. | :06:36. | |
down because of the oil price falling. But ultimately what a | :06:37. | :06:41. | |
government must do is secure energy security and make sure the energy is | :06:42. | :06:45. | |
affordable for domestic households, and also businesses the length and | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
breadth of the country. The gentleman in the checked shirt. The | :06:50. | :06:52. | |
point I was making was making sure there was a mixed energy policy to | :06:53. | :06:58. | |
keep the lights on. You are saying you will not retaliate but China put | :06:59. | :07:02. | |
a 66% tariff on steel exports. We are going to do nothing about that, | :07:03. | :07:07. | |
just let our steel supper, or do something about it? We must do | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
something batted, tariffs have been introduced, reinforcing steel, that | :07:12. | :07:15. | |
ultimately has had a big impact, but what you cannot do is have a knee | :07:16. | :07:18. | |
jerk reaction to this problem, because as I said, you get the | :07:19. | :07:21. | |
knock-on effect of a trade war happening that ultimately will | :07:22. | :07:25. | |
affect other locations. The gentleman in the tie, briefly. Just | :07:26. | :07:31. | |
changing the theme slightly, for the last 17 years, the Assembly has | :07:32. | :07:38. | |
banned a lot of money in Cardiff, but they seem to have ignored | :07:39. | :07:44. | |
investment in the rest of Wales, West Wales in particular. So, what | :07:45. | :07:48. | |
is your administration going to do, and how are you going to keep that | :07:49. | :07:51. | |
promise to the people in the rest of Wales? It is our commitment to make | :07:52. | :07:55. | |
sure... APPLAUSE | :07:56. | :07:59. | |
It is our commitment to make sure that the economic benefits are | :08:00. | :08:03. | |
spread around the whole of Wales. Transport links, for example, are | :08:04. | :08:06. | |
vital to make sure there are opportunities in any part of Wales, | :08:07. | :08:11. | |
for either businesses to thrive or setup. That's why we want to see the | :08:12. | :08:16. | |
duelling of the 840. What is vital as we keep momentum behind the city | :08:17. | :08:20. | |
deal concept that has the Westminster government working with | :08:21. | :08:23. | |
Welsh Conservative government in Cardiff Bay and local authorities to | :08:24. | :08:27. | |
deliver a Swansea City deal and North Wales powerhouse steel as well | :08:28. | :08:31. | |
as others. Let's move onto the second question. It comes now. Do | :08:32. | :08:39. | |
you have a stake in an offshore fund? | :08:40. | :08:47. | |
APPLAUSE I must probably do, my holiday | :08:48. | :08:50. | |
account which I try and put a couple of quid in each of week but I don't | :08:51. | :08:54. | |
have anything in Panama or the Cayman Islands or anything like that | :08:55. | :08:57. | |
and I can categorically and unequivocally confirmed that because | :08:58. | :09:02. | |
I will publish my tax affairs, just like every other leader has all will | :09:03. | :09:06. | |
be doing in the coming days. I don't have any stake in any offshore funds | :09:07. | :09:10. | |
whatsoever and I've never had a stake in an offshore fund. We will | :09:11. | :09:14. | |
get your tax return in a few days? That's correct, it would have been | :09:15. | :09:17. | |
today but I've been all around, tomorrow when I get back to Cardiff. | :09:18. | :09:22. | |
The other leaders accept Nathan Gill have given them out. I'm committed | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
to publishing them. As David Cameron done you a favour, or has he set a | :09:28. | :09:32. | |
dangerous precedent? Did you want to publish it? I've never had a problem | :09:33. | :09:35. | |
making that transparent to anyone who has asked. I've never had it | :09:36. | :09:42. | |
asked of me before. Where do you draw the line? The people that put | :09:43. | :09:47. | |
themselves forward to stand for election for First Minister have to | :09:48. | :09:50. | |
be completely open and transparent, as does anybody in public life, but | :09:51. | :09:54. | |
where the line is drawn, the current situation will determine that. Let's | :09:55. | :09:58. | |
take a point here. Thank you for your honesty but is it right for | :09:59. | :10:02. | |
David Cameron to benefit from his father's offshore funds, specially | :10:03. | :10:06. | |
at a time when the disabled community and other people are | :10:07. | :10:09. | |
having their benefits take enough them, ?30 taken off disabled people | :10:10. | :10:16. | |
around the UK and the bedroom tax, but David Cameron is benefiting from | :10:17. | :10:26. | |
his father's fund. I have personally lost out. What we have got to | :10:27. | :10:30. | |
reflect on is what society as a whole and disabled people have | :10:31. | :10:33. | |
benefited from, which is a growing economy, a record number of people | :10:34. | :10:37. | |
in employment, paying down the deficit and an extra ten the | :10:38. | :10:40. | |
compounds that went into dis-. It is a port in the last Parliament. | :10:41. | :10:44. | |
Working in shops and working in offices, very few, go around Saint | :10:45. | :10:49. | |
David Centre in Cardiff which I did a couple of weeks ago, fully | :10:50. | :10:53. | |
accessible and disabled people shopping but not one disabled person | :10:54. | :10:57. | |
working in any of those shops. Unfortunately what you say is not | :10:58. | :11:01. | |
true. I disagree, the figure showing the last 12 months to more people | :11:02. | :11:07. | |
with disabilities found employment, 3 million people found employment | :11:08. | :11:10. | |
with disabilities in the marketplace at the moment and ultimately over | :11:11. | :11:15. | |
the last two to three years 296,000 people have found employment who are | :11:16. | :11:19. | |
categorised as disabled. We need to do all we can to assist people back | :11:20. | :11:23. | |
into work and we need to put that support in-place. The only way you | :11:24. | :11:26. | |
can do that is if you have a growing economy that pays its way in the | :11:27. | :11:29. | |
world and ultimately offers that support. No one will thank us | :11:30. | :11:33. | |
because we picked up the letter in the Treasury when we walked into in | :11:34. | :11:37. | |
2010 that said all of the money is gone. What about Iain Duncan-Smith's | :11:38. | :11:44. | |
resignation letter? He left over disability reform and he said, I | :11:45. | :11:47. | |
hope as the government goes forward you can look again at the balance of | :11:48. | :11:50. | |
cuts you insisted upon and wonder if enough has been done to ensure we | :11:51. | :11:54. | |
are all in this together. Isn't that what this tax week shows? Extremely | :11:55. | :11:59. | |
wealthy people are in the government and we are not all in this together. | :12:00. | :12:04. | |
I disagree, we are all in this together, you need a growing | :12:05. | :12:07. | |
economy, you need an economy that can pay its way. VIP payments or | :12:08. | :12:14. | |
example will go up by nearly ?5 million to ?18 billion and | :12:15. | :12:19. | |
ultimately over ?50 billion spent on disability support. 156,000 people | :12:20. | :12:27. | |
in the last five months who have got this ability is have gone into | :12:28. | :12:30. | |
employment and 3 million people with disabilities are in employment. | :12:31. | :12:33. | |
There is more we can do and we should never sit back on our laurels | :12:34. | :12:38. | |
and constantly keep fighting for disability across all sections. A | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
few points from the audience, this gentleman here. You avoided a big | :12:43. | :12:48. | |
part of this man's question earlier. Since you want to be first minute of | :12:49. | :12:51. | |
the people of Wales deserve to know, do you condemn or do you condone | :12:52. | :12:55. | |
David Cameron's actions regarding his offshore fund? He's done nothing | :12:56. | :12:59. | |
illegal, he's been open and transparent. What about ethically? | :13:00. | :13:06. | |
Is what he did write? He's done what many thousands if not tens of | :13:07. | :13:09. | |
thousands or hundreds of thousands of people do which is to take | :13:10. | :13:14. | |
financial advice that offer them the ability to make sure they have | :13:15. | :13:18. | |
financial planning in-place. Ultimately he has been transparent | :13:19. | :13:21. | |
and open. Are you happy with the answer? I'm not happy with the | :13:22. | :13:32. | |
answer. Another point up there. What about people in a wheelchair, who | :13:33. | :13:38. | |
are not getting the facilities going round supermarkets. They are only | :13:39. | :13:44. | |
getting just a basic changing toilet. Why not have a proper | :13:45. | :13:54. | |
changing place toilet? What is that problem for the government? There | :13:55. | :13:58. | |
can be no excuses in the 21st-century fourth place is almost | :13:59. | :14:01. | |
being exclusion zones for people with disabilities. We have to make | :14:02. | :14:06. | |
shops, public spaces, the workplace accessible for people with | :14:07. | :14:10. | |
disabilities. I just don't accept that with modern building techniques | :14:11. | :14:13. | |
and the role of government in driving through building regulations | :14:14. | :14:16. | |
and ultimately the planning system and guidance in the planning system, | :14:17. | :14:21. | |
we have to make sure that we have an inclusive society that takes in all | :14:22. | :14:25. | |
sections of our society. It is government's rolled to do that. You | :14:26. | :14:32. | |
are just worrying about the cost. This is people's lives we are | :14:33. | :14:41. | |
talking about. This is what people in Britain and the whole of Wales | :14:42. | :14:48. | |
want, a proper changing place and not to be discriminated against. I | :14:49. | :14:51. | |
agree and if I was First Minister I'd make sure all of the leaders of | :14:52. | :14:56. | |
the Welsh government were working to that aim. In the 21st-century we | :14:57. | :14:59. | |
should not have any no-go areas in our society. | :15:00. | :15:01. | |
APPLAUSE It is time to move onto the next | :15:02. | :15:06. | |
question which comes from Rory Daniels. | :15:07. | :15:10. | |
What are your plans in terms of university tuition fees? We've come | :15:11. | :15:14. | |
forward with our plans and we are part of the Diamond Review group | :15:15. | :15:17. | |
that the current Welsh government has set up to look into the | :15:18. | :15:21. | |
financing of higher education. It is an important review that will look | :15:22. | :15:25. | |
to the sustainability of funding for students going into higher | :15:26. | :15:28. | |
education. We have announced we would reform student tuition fees so | :15:29. | :15:32. | |
that instead of paying the tuition free grant we would contribute to | :15:33. | :15:35. | |
the living costs of students and that would be a package over the | :15:36. | :15:39. | |
term of the assembly of ?400 million. All parties know that the | :15:40. | :15:44. | |
current system is unaffordable. At the moment, in England or other | :15:45. | :15:50. | |
parts of the United Kingdom, it kicks in at 21000 and if you start | :15:51. | :15:55. | |
earning over 21,000 you start paying back the tuition fee. You are | :15:56. | :15:58. | |
looking at a guy who never went to university. I'm not someone who had | :15:59. | :16:03. | |
free higher education. I left school at 16, so ultimately what I want to | :16:04. | :16:09. | |
see is parity with vocational education and academic education. It | :16:10. | :16:12. | |
is a fact that if you hack the degree you will earn more in the | :16:13. | :16:14. | |
workplace, but one thing that students keep telling us time and | :16:15. | :16:20. | |
time again is one of the biggest obstacles they face at university is | :16:21. | :16:24. | |
the cost of living and those upfront costs they cannot meet. -- have a | :16:25. | :16:28. | |
degree. Our package would pay half of that if you live away from home | :16:29. | :16:32. | |
and that is a package of ?400 million of support for students. | :16:33. | :16:35. | |
Students would end up with less than they have now. They would end up | :16:36. | :16:41. | |
with less. How much? Our package is ?400 million over the five years of | :16:42. | :16:45. | |
the assembly and the current package of support is heading towards ?250 | :16:46. | :16:50. | |
million a year. We have done some rough calculations and tell me if | :16:51. | :16:54. | |
I'm wrong, we have worked out they would be ?2000 worse off each year, | :16:55. | :16:58. | |
is that correct? It depends on the student and what package comes out | :16:59. | :17:01. | |
of the Diamond Review currently looking into higher education | :17:02. | :17:04. | |
funding, which all parties I had assumed were signed up to, and no | :17:05. | :17:08. | |
party is committed to continuing the current package. They would be ?2000 | :17:09. | :17:12. | |
per year worse off. Will you be honest about how much worse off they | :17:13. | :17:16. | |
will be? What I'm saying is our package is a different package, it | :17:17. | :17:19. | |
is costed and affordable and will be in place for the five years of the | :17:20. | :17:24. | |
assembly, and it will deliver support straightaway. What about | :17:25. | :17:27. | |
students living with their parents, would they get anything? There would | :17:28. | :17:31. | |
not be support for living with your parents, it is for students who move | :17:32. | :17:35. | |
away and it would be ?400 million of support for the five years of the | :17:36. | :17:37. | |
assembly. The lady in the strikes. Would you be cutting student | :17:38. | :17:48. | |
maintenance grants? We'd still make that available to students and | :17:49. | :17:52. | |
ultimately supporting them in their higher education experience. The | :17:53. | :17:56. | |
package I've said we have brought forward is affordable, costed and | :17:57. | :17:59. | |
deliverable and ultimately, we are not trying to pre-empt what the | :18:00. | :18:04. | |
Diamond Review will support. It's a review the Labour Party set up and | :18:05. | :18:08. | |
other parties signed up to. That will be the guiding principle of the | :18:09. | :18:14. | |
way HE support funding goes in the future. The lady there who's been | :18:15. | :18:21. | |
very patient after you first, Sir? What would a Welsh Government go d | :18:22. | :18:29. | |
to stop the brain drain of students from London, England, those areas? | :18:30. | :18:33. | |
My grandmother is going to university next year, ?400 million | :18:34. | :18:37. | |
means nothing to us as individuals. Surely you should have more detail | :18:38. | :18:40. | |
ready by now so everybody knows exactly how much it's going to cost | :18:41. | :18:46. | |
them? It's about half the living costs of what the student would | :18:47. | :18:51. | |
face. It's rent only, to be specific? And it would be payable on | :18:52. | :18:57. | |
the first day of entry, so it would be an upfront payment, rather than | :18:58. | :19:00. | |
having to wait to be paid. The biggest put off to students about | :19:01. | :19:03. | |
going to university is the upfront costs that deter many people access | :19:04. | :19:07. | |
in the University of Their choice. Would this be at any University? It | :19:08. | :19:11. | |
would be at any, yes. The brain drain point? That is vital for the | :19:12. | :19:15. | |
future well-being of the Welsh economy. Figures out last week came | :19:16. | :19:19. | |
forward that showed Wales after 17 years of devolution is still | :19:20. | :19:26. | |
spending ?14.5 billion more than it raises in taxes. There's one thing, | :19:27. | :19:30. | |
one thing, that the Welsh Conservatives want to achieve, and | :19:31. | :19:34. | |
that is a more prosperous, successful Wales. We have great | :19:35. | :19:38. | |
talent in Wales. We have the ambition and the entrepreneurial | :19:39. | :19:42. | |
skill. We need a Government that will unlock that skill, that | :19:43. | :19:45. | |
entrepreneurial talent, and I believe that we have the answers, | :19:46. | :19:51. | |
the solutions, that will retain those brains in Wales to ultimately | :19:52. | :19:56. | |
make us a successful and dynamic 21st century economy. | :19:57. | :20:04. | |
APPLAUSE. Do you intend to stay in Wales? Yes. I just know that most | :20:05. | :20:12. | |
people... Wales for instance, per GDP Capita, is half that of England. | :20:13. | :20:16. | |
Given the taxes are the same, what incentive is there for someone who's | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
leaving university with a first or a 2-1 looking to get a good job, why | :20:22. | :20:24. | |
stay in Wales? That is why we have got to grow the business community | :20:25. | :20:30. | |
here in Wales so that there are greater opportunities in all | :20:31. | :20:32. | |
sections of the business world for people to practise and put their | :20:33. | :20:35. | |
degrease into practise here in Wales. | :20:36. | :20:38. | |
Thank you very much. Sorry to rush you, we must move on to the next | :20:39. | :20:43. | |
question from Sandra Watson? You supported the nurse staffing | :20:44. | :20:46. | |
levels Bill. If you win the election, will you go further and | :20:47. | :20:52. | |
guarantee staffing levels within the NHS? Thank you very much for that | :20:53. | :20:55. | |
question, Sandra. The NHS is one of the things that is so dear to my | :20:56. | :21:01. | |
heart and I really don't mean that cornually, I owe the life of my | :21:02. | :21:04. | |
18-year-old son now to the brilliance and Majesty of the NHS. | :21:05. | :21:08. | |
In 2003, he was involved in a car accident. I've been passionate since | :21:09. | :21:12. | |
I was elected leader, but before that when I was the health spokes | :21:13. | :21:15. | |
thes person to make sure we give the Welsh NHS a fair deal. That's why we | :21:16. | :21:19. | |
are committed to protecting the health budget that will allow Health | :21:20. | :21:23. | |
Commissioners to commission the staffing requirements that they | :21:24. | :21:27. | |
require on the wards, in the GP surgeries and in the community, so | :21:28. | :21:32. | |
that we can meet the aspirations of what nurses, doctors and everyone in | :21:33. | :21:38. | |
the NHS wants, which is a well-funded, well-staffed, | :21:39. | :21:40. | |
well-managed NHS that will get on top of the doubling of waiting times | :21:41. | :21:44. | |
that we've seen under the current Welsh Labour Government. If you | :21:45. | :21:48. | |
haven't got the staff and don't value the staff, you will never | :21:49. | :21:51. | |
reach your objectives. The staff are the oil that makes the NHS work in | :21:52. | :21:57. | |
Wales. You say you're passionate about the NHS in Wales, yet all your | :21:58. | :22:00. | |
Government's done in Westminster is ridicule it and describe it as a | :22:01. | :22:06. | |
line between life-and-death, and that has upset a lot of people | :22:07. | :22:09. | |
within the NHS in Wales? No. You are completely wrong there. What we have | :22:10. | :22:12. | |
done... APPLAUSE. | :22:13. | :22:24. | |
What we have done is point out where 17 years of Labour failure have | :22:25. | :22:29. | |
inflicted a doubling of the waiting times, a demoralisation of the staff | :22:30. | :22:34. | |
within the NHS, a closure of minor injury units and ultimately an | :22:35. | :22:41. | |
inability to have a drugs cancer funding system that will deliver | :22:42. | :22:45. | |
funding to cancer patients in Wales. Following on from the ongoing | :22:46. | :22:48. | |
situation in England, would a Conservative Government in Wales try | :22:49. | :22:52. | |
to manufacture a dispute with the Welsh junior doctors? Not at all. We | :22:53. | :22:55. | |
are not committed to changing the contract. What I will say to you is, | :22:56. | :23:00. | |
we'll not tolerate premature deaths within the Welsh NHS or any health | :23:01. | :23:05. | |
setting which ultimately is what a seven day, 24-hour NHS is seeking to | :23:06. | :23:12. | |
achieve on th. We will not be a Government, like the Labour Party, | :23:13. | :23:16. | |
that presided over the Mid Staffs debacle. The lady in the front? Some | :23:17. | :23:22. | |
very ambitious plans for the NHS and we know the NHS is facing serious | :23:23. | :23:27. | |
financial crisis. When are those things I've heard your Government | :23:28. | :23:32. | |
will do when you get into power is reinstate prescription charges in | :23:33. | :23:37. | |
Wales. How will you protect people who're on benefits, disabilities, | :23:38. | :23:42. | |
and actually can't afford multiple prescriptions who live with | :23:43. | :23:49. | |
APPLAUSE APPLAUSE. It's vital we protect free | :23:50. | :23:55. | |
prescriptions. I make no bones about that whatsoever. The prescriptions | :23:56. | :24:00. | |
budget for the Welsh NHS is about ?600 million. What I don't accept is | :24:01. | :24:05. | |
that people who can afford cannot make a contribution, a ?5 | :24:06. | :24:10. | |
contribution to the cost, so we can pay for cancer treatments fund, we | :24:11. | :24:16. | |
can put money into hospices and stroke services. Our policy would | :24:17. | :24:21. | |
seek to free up about ?35-?40 million. All the groups that you | :24:22. | :24:26. | |
mentioned there would not pay prescription charges under the Welsh | :24:27. | :24:30. | |
Conservatives. I do not believe it's right or fair that a millionaire can | :24:31. | :24:36. | |
walk into Tescos and get paracetamol or Bonn gel la on prescription, yet | :24:37. | :24:42. | |
a person with a cancer diagnosis cannot receive the best drugs | :24:43. | :24:45. | |
available to them, either to beat the cancer diagnosis or give them | :24:46. | :24:48. | |
valuable times with their loved ones. That is not social justice. | :24:49. | :24:53. | |
APPLAUSE. We are not just talking about people | :24:54. | :24:57. | |
with cancer, we are talking about people with long-term conditions, | :24:58. | :25:01. | |
people with arthritis, previously when prescription charges were in | :25:02. | :25:05. | |
action in Wales, were going without their medication because they | :25:06. | :25:08. | |
couldn't afford their prescriptions. I do not want to see that happen | :25:09. | :25:12. | |
again. I don't want to see it happen again and it will not happen so long | :25:13. | :25:15. | |
as I'm First Minister or the Welsh Conservatives are in Government. | :25:16. | :25:19. | |
What we won't continue is funding millionaires, as I say, to have free | :25:20. | :25:24. | |
Bonn gel la and paracetamol or cream for athlete's foot. -- Bonjela. You | :25:25. | :25:32. | |
in red, you have been very patient? I want to say that the crap that's | :25:33. | :25:40. | |
been thrown at the PM over the tax haven thing is absolutely | :25:41. | :25:43. | |
unbelievable and has been used as a threat to the Conservatives from the | :25:44. | :25:49. | |
other parties and also, I would like to say, I've experience of the NHS | :25:50. | :25:53. | |
in England and the NHS in Wales I cannot fault. I would like to | :25:54. | :25:59. | |
pronounce that, because both my husband and myself, my daughter and | :26:00. | :26:05. | |
her family in England do not have the cover and the care that we have | :26:06. | :26:10. | |
in Wales. I know a lot of people will say, oh, no, we haven't got | :26:11. | :26:14. | |
this, we haven't got that. You try and go over the border on the Severn | :26:15. | :26:18. | |
Bridge and you'll not get the care that we have in Wales and that's due | :26:19. | :26:23. | |
to your support. I would also like to make the point | :26:24. | :26:27. | |
that I feel our leader of the Conservative Party in Wales is one | :26:28. | :26:31. | |
of the best we've ever had. Right, you have a fan there. I agree | :26:32. | :26:36. | |
with your last point! Can I give one stat? Very briefly. That's one thing | :26:37. | :26:41. | |
we can focus on on the NHS, along with many others. In England, you | :26:42. | :26:44. | |
are out of hospital in four-and-a-half days, in Wales, it's | :26:45. | :26:49. | |
six-and-a-half days, it costs ?500 a night too keep someone in hospital, | :26:50. | :26:52. | |
we can do so much more to make our NHS so much more efficient and get | :26:53. | :26:57. | |
the money working for the nurses, doctors, communities. | :26:58. | :27:01. | |
Let's take a point from the lady in the black dress here, please? Hi, | :27:02. | :27:06. | |
there. I would like to know what would be the annual minimum salary | :27:07. | :27:09. | |
in order to pay a prescription charge. Can you tell us, ?17,000, | :27:10. | :27:20. | |
?50,000? The I The base I use, take a 40% taxpayer, your national | :27:21. | :27:23. | |
insurance numbers determine where that starts and you can then have | :27:24. | :27:27. | |
that access from your medical records. I don't think it's fair | :27:28. | :27:32. | |
that a 40% taxpayer... But do you not know the actual amount because | :27:33. | :27:36. | |
I'm self-employed so obviously my earnings are going to change | :27:37. | :27:40. | |
throughout the year. So you want a figure, a salary figure? The 40% | :27:41. | :27:46. | |
taxpayer. So if you pay 40% tax, you pay? If you pay 40% tax, you will | :27:47. | :27:53. | |
not get free prescriptions. You very briefly? You say you want to put | :27:54. | :27:58. | |
money into hospitals. I have to ask, why has the Prince Philip Hospital | :27:59. | :28:07. | |
in Llanelli been produced? Loss of services you were talking about? | :28:08. | :28:10. | |
It's been reduced to a minor services facility. We'll commit to | :28:11. | :28:16. | |
re-opening of minor injuries units, protection of the health budget, a | :28:17. | :28:22. | |
sustainable model of health care fit for the 21st century and doesn't | :28:23. | :28:25. | |
allow waiting times to double again as they have done under this tenure | :28:26. | :28:30. | |
of a Labour Government from to #20 11-2015. That is not acceptable and | :28:31. | :28:35. | |
it's not what the staff want. We are not close any hospitals. | :28:36. | :28:38. | |
Thank you very much. We are out of time. Join us again tomorrow when | :28:39. | :28:43. | |
we'll put questions to the Ukip leader Nathan Gill. Thank you to our | :28:44. | :28:49. | |
audience here, the leader of the Welsh Conservatives Andrew RT Davies | :28:50. | :28:51. | |
and to you. Good night. | :28:52. | :28:54. |