16/07/2014 Daily Politics


Similar Content

Browse content similar to 16/07/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!



Morning folks and welcome to the Daily Politics.


Men were sacked, women promoted - but how different does government


A new Foreign Secretary and European Commissioner.


The last Conservative Europhile around the cabinet table, out.


Is Britain moving closer to a European exit?


The last Prime Minster's Questions before MPs swap


the green benches for the beach - we'll bring you that live at noon.


You bad mouth them - then you have to meet them.


We bring you the most cringe-worthy political encounters.


All that coming up in the next 90 minutes of the very


And after yesterday's brutal ministerial


reshuffle, a little compassion here at the Daily Politics.


Despite losing his job yesterday, we've kept him on.


He was a cabinet office minister, now just a plain MP - Ken Clarke.


And she's not male or stale, and she's still got her job - for now.


Ken, were you jumped -- did you jump or you pushed? I was obviously going


to retire. I thought I was going to retire the last time. I agreed with


David I would do a couple of years. As by far the oldest member of the


Government, decided to leave. The press were very slow to realise I


was demob happy. I saw a smile on your face. Wednesday, Thursday and


Friday of last week I was at Trent Bridge for a Test match. On Monday I


came down and handed in my retirement. David knew it was


coming. We had a very good chat. I have only just started being a


minister. I was beginning to pick it up I! You are a slow learner. If he


had asked you to stay, would you have stayed? He would have had to


persuade me. He persuaded me to come back to the front bench about six


years ago when I was the most rebellious backbencher in the House


of Commons. I was rather surprised to get the invitation. Better to be


an insider than outside. You are going to stand as an MP again? Yes.


I am a political anorak. I find the process of governance is


fascinating. I find politics fascinating. What do you make of


these changes? It has been billed as ladies table the consequence of


ladies day is we have the same number of women MPs in the Cabinet


as 2011. Even then it was only five. David has always brought women in.


He has lost three from the Cabinet already. I hope this lot will have a


good long stint. They will only have nine months. You must point on


merit. But where people are of equal talent, I would give women the


preference because we need more women in politics.


preference because we need more women in It is a shame we don't have


so many women in politics. These are good women. Maybe people will stop


commenting on their gender, criticising what they wear etc, and


just accept it is a government... We are a long way from that. Maybe so.


Why did he take so long? Tony Blair used to reshuffle once every nine


months. John Reid had five Cabinet jobs in four years. I think he has


gone back to a better tradition of having a big reshuffle once, twice


at the most common in the course of a parliament. There is no point in


appointing a minister who will not master is or her brief to get on


with doing something. These ministers have only got ten months


where they will not do very much. They only have two demonstrate their


ministerial calibre. They have to campaign more. He should leave them


in post after the election when they win it. Can the Tories win an


overall majority? I think it is a tall order. If you were to look me


in the eye and tell me you knew who was going to win the next election


precisely, I wouldn't believe you. I am looking you in the eye but I am


not telling you that. The cynicism about politics, the anti-political


nihilism, more difficult than ever before. But we are more likely to be


the biggest single party. before. But we are more likely to be


challenge for the Conservative Party is to get the overall majority. If


it is a minority government, should Mr Cameron do another deal with the


Lib Dems or run a minority government? I don't understand this


minority government 's tough because you cannot do anything. We are in


the middle of a financial crisis. The next comment has to take


stronger steps. A coalition. I feared a hung parliament. I didn't


think British politicians could do it. I thought we were all too


tribal. The big success was to form a coalition and put the national


interest first. It is the only way to handle it. You have done public


sector reform. You have logged the forces of conservatism in the eye


and done it. -- looked. Why move Michael Gove, the most successful


public service reform, according to his supporters, and give the people


who opposed them a scalp? I don't know. I was as surprised as


everybody else. My guess is, to just quieten the subject down in the


run-up to the election, when Margaret, despite my protests,


insisted on moving me from the Department of Health and putting me


on to education, I argued the toss. She insisted on moving me. I cannot


remember what reason she gave me. It was pretty silly! I realised that he


rapidly her intention was to quieten me down before the election. Michael


will be back. The run-up to the election is more important than the


school reform to the prime Minister? If you live in a Parliamentary


democracy, you have to accept that tough things need to be done in the


first two or three years. By the last ten months you have to start


campaigning because you want to finish the job, which I hope we


will. I am glad you are here today. Liz, it is your turn! After


everything that happened yesterday, it was very dramatic, much more


extensive than anybody thought, can expect a Labour reshuffle? I have no


idea. I have heard nothing. Don't know anything. No idea. Do you think


there should be a Labour re-shore full? You know that is a matter for


Ed Miliband and it is way above my pay grade. I don't know if I am


allowed to, but one of the things I wanted to ask Ken was, obviously it


is more of a Eurosceptic Cabinet now, and you have fought all your


political life for a moderate one nation Conservative Party. Do you


think you're leaving means that is gone? We are going to talk about


Europe. You have two weight! One of my views about the reshuffle is,


that is the thing I am most worried about. You can come back to that.


But other look at the team for a labourer. The Guardian ICM poll this


week had you in second place behind the Conservatives. -- for a


labourer. Doesn't that indicated time to freshen up your team? I have


no idea if there is going to be a reshuffle. I think it is going to be


really tough before the general election. For all the parties, for


the reasons Ken said. The biggest problem is that people are so fed up


with politicians. They don't hear anything we say because we often


don't sound like them or look like them. You don't think your team


sounds or looks like them? When you are knocking on doors, people's view


about politics and politicians, not trusting us, not believing us, not


believing we care about what they do, I believe my party does. I am


under no illusions about the scale of the challenge. Do you agree with


Ken Clarke that it will be very difficult for the Conservatives to


have an overall majority? Would be very difficult to have an overall


majority for Labour? I think it is too close to call. We are playing to


win. There is a big fight over the next ten months. Why have the


opinion polls narrowed over the last few months, so much so that the


Conservatives have even gone ahead in several? I think people are


thinking about what is happening in their lives. Certainly over the


course of the European elections, we saw UKIP do very well, taking votes


of the Tories. Why have the Conservatives gone ahead? People are


generally looking for parties and provide an answer to the problems


they face. UKIP have come in with easy answers that I do not believe


the answers. That has had an impact. Charles Clarke thinks the most


output -- outcome is a Tory overall majority because Ed Miliband lacks


credibility. I do not agree with Charles Clarke. Ed is a passionate


and tough leader. It is going to be incredibly tough. It is all to play


for and we are playing to win. He is a big beast, Charles Clarke. I hate


that term! He is a worse leader than Neal Kinnock, he says of Ed


Miliband. I don't agree with that. The most important thing Ed has


identified is that the economy was not working for people on Middle or


low incomes even before the financial crash. That is because of


the structure of the economy, connotation from across the world.


Not just low skilled jobs but middle skilled jobs are being lost. He


identified that first and foremost. We have had many opinion polls where


we have had a lead. Some have gone down, some will go up macro. The


central issue is how we get our economy to work for ordinary


people, not just those of the top. He was the first to identify that I


believe we have the policies to sort those problems. I will not call you


big beast. That is the least of my worries!


Ken wasn't the only big beast to leave cabinet - but he was


And yesterday also saw the departure of Foreign Secretary William Hague.


So what does this all mean for the Conservative Party and


Well Andrew, while David Cameron was reshuffling his ministerial pack


yesterday, Jean Claude Juncker was confirmed as the new President - or


Cameron thinks his ace in Europe is this man - the relative


He is currently the Conservative leader in the House of Lords


and now the PM's nominee for European Commissioner.


But will Mr Juncker see him as an ace or a joker?


He'll be doing the job as Mr Cameron tries to renegotiate Britain's


membership of the EU ahead of the proposed in/out referendum in 2017.


A referendum in which the new Foreign Secretary - jack of all


trades - Philip Hammond, has said he could contemplate voting to leave.


And the European Court of Human Rights could also be in the


firing line, as the departure of Dominic Grieve as Attorney General


is seen as clearing the way for a tougher stance on the human rights


And joining us now is UKIP's deputy leader, Paul Nuttall.


He is in the entertainment capital of Europe, known as Strasberg. You


can see he is enjoying himself. -- Strasbourg. It is the Las Vegas of


the German, Franco border. Is this the most Eurosceptic Cabinet we have


ever had, Ken Clarke? No, it is not. I am the most outspoken pro-European


who has left the Cabinet but I am not the only pro-European by a long


way. Who is left? There is nobody in the Cabinet who wants to leave the


European Union. The others can speak for themselves. I was in a position


as the elder statesman of being slightly more outspoken than some of


my colleagues. Pre-Harold Macmillan... I heard Harold


Macmillan make an announcement. Let's not go there. What went wrong?


I don't know, really. It was a reaction to the fall of Margaret


Thatcher, and Conrad Black buying the Daily Telegraph, but this is


probably not the time. Paul Nuttall, although Mr Clarke finds it quite


hard to admit, this is the most Eurosceptic cabinet that has ever


have in this country, certainly on the Tory part of it. It has been put


together against you. This is an anti-UKIP cabinet, isn't it? Once


again, the Conservatives are trying to play catch up. Cameron has had


for years to try to do something about the European Union. The only


offered a referendum from a position of weakness because of the strength


of UKIP. Cameron remains Prime Minister, and he is a committed


Europhile, though he said he would go into the renegotiation, he has


already said then he will campaign to stay within the European Union.


So negotiations are pie in the sky, and I listened yesterday to


Jean-Claude Juncker in the chamber yesterday when he said quite clearly


the biggest issue the Briton is freedom of movement of peoples, and


that is not on the table. So the whole thing is pie in the sky. As


the great Sean Connery once said in the Untouchable in a row macro you


don't go to a gunfight carrying a knife. Is Mr Cameron a Europhile? I


think he and the Cabinet will recommend a yes vote, and try to


negotiate. Is he a Europhile? He is not as pro-Europe is me. Jean-Claude


Juncker is not as pro-Europe as you. The idea that David Cameron is an


isolationist nationalist, which is what Euroscepticism is sometimes a


youth is for -- a euphemism for, is nonsense. Rea that is how he has


ended up, not just here, but in other countries. He has not altered


the policy, the new Cabinet will not alter the policy that had me in it.


The idea is to achieve a process of reform and to exclude people how a


modernised, reformed Europe is in British interests. Ken, Ken! Hold


on, I want to bring in Liz Kendall. Doesn't labour have to re-burnish


its offerings? I am a strongly pro-European politician, because I


think it is in our national interests, our jobs and investment


depend on it, and it is vital for a whole range of other issues


important for the country. What I think the problem... I didn't ask


about David Cameron, with respect, I asked about Labour, and I said that


Labour's policy does not seem to be in June with the British people.


Every time you criticise David Cameron, whether it was the veto a


couple of years ago, or being out on a limb over Juncker, his poll


ratings rise. OK, but sometimes you have to argue what you believe in,


and I believe that a reformed Europe that is turbo-charging jobs and


growth with proper reform... What makes you think you will ever get


that? I believe there are countries you can build alliances with, who


want to see... Did you listen to Mr Juncker yesterday? Actually, when we


were in government, the way that we got change was by building


alliances, often across political parties with leaders of different


persuasions, about how Europe has to change. If your approach is about


repatriating powers alone, rather than the bigger prize, which is a


reformed Europe, that is a mistake. You could be electing your pension


by the time that happens. Why are you soap as a mystic about change?


Because I have told people tell you, like -- tell me, like you, like Ken,


that we will change, and it never happens. Can I explain why we are in


a different situation now? Number one, because we have had the


financial crash, and that is more a kick up the proverbial than anything


that has happened before. Quite frankly, we should have spent the


last couple of weeks not talking about jobs for the boys, but jobs


for people in this country across Europe. Paul Nuttall is still with


us, what do you make of all that? Repatriations of powers is not on


the table. Mr Juncker made that perfectly clear for is that what he


said was he was not opposed to it but it would require the support of


27 other member states so it just isn't going to happen. The way that


this guy was appointed guest today, backroom deals, behind closed doors


-- appointed yesterday, and Mr Juncker is the epitome of it. This


place is not going to change. It is going to roll on. They have pushed


us closer to the exit door, which is a good thing. Why are you taking a


dive in the polls? We are not. ICN gets us consistently wrong. You are


now down to 9%. In one ICN poll, if it was other ones, I would worry, I


am not bothered about this one. I know he used to be your special


adviser, but this chap, Jonathan Hill, that no one seems to have


heard of, why put a total unknown as the British commissioner candidate,


and at the same time expect to be given a major job, a major economic


portfolio? Surely this makes it a lots less likely? The European


Commissioners are not all high profile national politicians. Cathy


Ashton, never mind Mandelson, she has done a very good job actually,


the higher representative, the foreign affairs leader in the


council. If you had heard of Cathy Ashton before she was sent there, I


would be very surprised indeed. Jonathan Hill firstly had the great


privilege of working with me as my legal aid when we were in employment


in DTI. He was John Major's right-hand man. When John Major was


Prime Minister. He has been back in government for some time. He has


been in the Cabinet to some time. He understands the economy and


business, you made money in business. To say he is a wheeler


dealer operator is wrong, I am sure he can do that, it is part of


politics, but he is actually extremely intelligent. Let's go back


to Liz Kendall, this thing we could be on the brink of some massive


European reform. I didn't say that, Andrew. I said that is what our goal


has got to be. I believe we have chances to do it, we would have to


work very hard on it and it won't happen with this government. We now


have is a president of the European Commission somebody who yesterday


said that he regarded the euro is the thing, the mechanism that had


saved the European Union, had been great for the European Union, and


that that was the kind of Europe you wanted. If that is the case, shall I


tell you what youth unemployment is in Spain, Italy? No, you don't need


to tell me things like that. It was not caused by the euro. I know there


are horrific levels of unemployment. How will you get a coalition to


change with attitudes like that? I think it is probably more about


getting the leaders of the different countries who believe that Europe


needs to reform to get agreement. I am not saying the president of the


commission or the commissioners don't have an important role, but I


think ultimately it is about the leaders of the different European


countries coming together and realising, Europe has got to change


if we are going to focus on the things that matter to people. To the


people we are supposed to represent. It is very general. In the end, I


think it is about the leaders of the country. The European Commission


president has a role. Juncker was right about one thing yesterday, you


cannot change the free movement of people. No one is proposing that we


do. Excuse me, your party is. You have a UKIP guy who brings it back


to immigration. If you are to say the whole argument is about bigotry


and prejudice, fair enough. The changes we wish to make is to make


it clearer that people cannot come here just to claim benefit. Not many


do, not many have, we are not very good at reporting it, we and the


Germans and everyone else. There are 2 million Brits working in Europe.


Paul Nuttall, I will give you the final word because you have the most


difficult gig this morning, being down the line. Bring us back to


immigration, come on! It is bigoted to be concerned about immigration,


but you go into any council estate in the North of England, or places


like Essex, and say that, when we have a million of our own kids


unemployed. What we need to do is to control our own borders, have a


points -based system to everyone where we can choose who comes and


who doesn't into our country. While we have freedom of movement of


peoples, that is not possible. We will have to leave it there.


Now, a reminder yesterday, as if we needed one,


of why it's safer to broadcast from a hermetically sealed studio.


Never mind the wind, rain and occasionally disruptive


As he tried to update viewers on the latest on the reshuffle, Sky's


Political Editor, Adam Boulton, was stopped in mid-flow - by a fly.


if we look at the changing complexion of this Cabinet, compared


to the last one, the one yesterday, and what we can see is... . Graeme


ad, do you want to take a pause? You have been talking nonstop. Are you


OK? I swallowed a fly. I have recovered now. He did well there to


recover. I have been asked to point out that an animal was hurt. Who


knows what happened to the fly. We do sympathise with your plight. We


have the perfect remedy. Filled with hot or cold liquid,


flies or other airborne insects can And, if you pay attention,


it could be yours. I speak, of course,


of a Daily Politics mug. What better receptacle to grace


a Sky News screen? We'll remind you how to enter


in a minute, but let's see if you MUSIC. I went into this agreement


because I was not prepared to tolerate a situation of continuing


violence. We have decided that the National


union of Mineworkers shall organise a return to work on choose day.


And you can see the full terms and conditions for Guess The Year


on our website, that's bbc.co.uk/dailypolitics.


It's coming up to midday here, just take a look at Big Ben,


Yes, Prime Minister's Questions is on its way.


It is the final PMQs of the summer, so if you would like to comment on


proceedings, you can e-mail us, And that's not all;


Nick Robinson is here. Mr Miliband has not been in the news


recently. It has been the Tory, reshuffle, other matters. He will be


in the news very soon because he is going to the White House. There was


a report on the Today programme, he will be there and very soon, next


week. Ed Miliband will make his visit to the White House. I don't


think he will mention that. He will try to put his own characterisation


on the reshuffle, because he knows that the right throughs in the


Sunday paper will have to characterise it in a particular way


and he needs to put his imprint on the reshuffle. With these very good


employment statistics, he has to be very wary that David Cameron doesn't


say again you don't want to talk about the economy, you asked me


about health, about this, about that, it is time you spoke about the


economy. The unemployment figures are incredible, amazing how quick it


has gone down, but average earnings fell yet again. And yesterday or the


day before, I can't run a ball which, inflation went up as well, so


the gap between earnings and prices, which everyone expected to start a


narrow now, is actually widening again. Which allows Ed Miliband to


say that the cost of living crisis, as he calls it, is not a short-term


thing, it is for the long-term. It would be surprising if he was not to


use this last opportunity before the summer to try and reinforce that. He


has to do a good performance because he has had, frankly, a difficult


couple of months, but he has his visit to the White House today, he


also has the national policy reform, Labour's big policy-making


conference this weekend. There will be a big speech on Saturday when we


Are planning to campaign on the summer months? -- are they planning.


Labour got it kicking last time from political journalists. I was


speaking to a Labour insider at the other day and there is an obsession


with having several stories a day during the summer to make up for


that. Let's go over to the final Prime Minister's Questions of the


summer. In addition to my duties in this


House, I shall have further meetings today. Given his commitment to


equality, with the Prime Minister explain why 75% of his cabinet are


still men? I think the honourable lady is being a little bit churlish.


The government before my one had four women Cabinet ministers and


three additional women attending cabinet. We have five members of the


covenant and an additional three attending. In terms of the


Conservative Party, I am leading a coalition government. When it comes


to Conservatives sitting around the Cabinet table, I am proud to say one


third of them are now women. Having -- having rightly reaffirmed


his confidence in the Transport Secretary, can I urge my right


honourable friend to urge him to give early priority to the


improvement of the railway line serving East Anglia? I am well aware


of this problem and some of the campaigns and I know my right


honourable friend, the transport minister, now backed by a larger


team of ministers in the transport department, will give that their


urgent attention. Mr Ed Miliband. Mr Speaker, we have always said that


we will support the Government when they do the right thing. So can I


join thousands of parents across the country in congratulating him on


getting rid of the Education Secretary. Why did he demote him? To


answer the question... I hope the whole House can come together in


this way, which is the right honourable member for North West


Hampshire has served in this House of Commons for over 40 years and he


will be retiring at the next election. And so when it came to


replacing an extra ordinary politician, and someone who has


given so much to this country, as the Chief Whip, I wanted to find the


very best candidate and I am proud to have done so in the former


Education Secretary. He has obviously got a very short memory,


Mr Speaker. This is what he used to say about the Education Secretary. I


want to trust the Education Secretary to get on with that job


for many years. Rather than saying, I am now going to show view over


somewhere else. Why did he do it? Is it the shortage of primary school


places? The unqualified teachers or the failure of his free school 's?


He achieved a record number of academies, new free schools,


standards are rising the country and reforms that will endure. But isn't


it extraordinary, not a day of a record -- on the day of a record


increase in employment in our country, he will do anything not to


talk about economic recovery, deficit falling, economy growing,


numbers of work increasing. I am not surprised he does not want to talk


about people in work, his own job looks a bit shaky. I am bound to say


if it has all been such a great success, I still don't know why he


said -- sacked the Education Secretary. Let's talk about the


figures. The economic recovery is not benefiting most working people,


who are working harder for a longer for less. There are 7 million people


who are in working families who are paid so little they are in poverty.


Does he think the economy is working for them. Let me bring the House


up-to-date on the unemployment figures. We see employment by


254,000 this quarter. We see women's employment up. We see youth


unemployment up. And we see the unemployment count falling by


121,000. And we have reached an important milestone in our country,


which is more people in work in our country than ever before in our


history. We can now say that since this government came to office,


there are 1.8 million more people in work. That is a record that we can


be proud of. And something that the Labour leader has raised a week


after week, long-term youth unemployment, that is now lower than


when this comment came to office. Now of course it is disappointing


that pays not rising faster. But let me remind him what the director of


the Institute for fiscal studies said. He said that we have had a


great big recession. The biggest recession in 100 years. It would be


astonishing of household incomes have not fallen and earnings have


not fallen. That is what has happened. We know who is responsible


for the great economic recession. Extraordinarily, they are still in


their jobs. He is in his fifth year as Prime Minister and all he can do


is try and blame someone else. And he just does not get it. He just


doesn't get it. This week we saw shocking figures about another group


suffering from the cost of living crisis. Millions of young people


whose earnings are falling faster than everyone else. One in four of


them living with their parents because they cannot afford to buy a


house or even rent one. Does he honestly think they are feeling the


benefit of the recovery? Of course we want living standards to recover


faster. There are two things you need to do to make that happen.


Firstly, get more people into work. We want living standards to recover


faster. There are two things you need to do to make that happen.


Firstly, get more people into work. -- yesterday Labour announced it is


their policy to put up taxes on middle income people. Perhaps he can


get to his feet and tell us which taxes on which people. I ask the


questions and he fails to answer them. And the reality is he has the


worst record on living standards of any prime minister in history. But


there is one group... I will tell them what is weak. It is saying a


month ago he is happy with his team and then sacking part of his team.


There is one group feeling the benefit of the recovery. Can he


confirmed that while average pay is down ?1600 a year since the last


election, last year the top 1% took home an extra ?15 billion after the


millionaires tax cut? I am happy with my team. Looking at the Shadow


Chancellor, I am pretty happy with his team, too. Let me explain that


one of the things which happened yesterday was the deputy leader of


the Labour Party on the radio said this. I think people on middle


incomes should contribute more through their taxes. That is what


she said. There we are. That is their policy. The squeezed middle


will be squeezed more. Now he needs to tell us which people are going to


pay which taxes, because on this side of the House we have cut


council tax, petrol duty, the jobs tax, we have increased the marriage


couple's allowance. Labour will put a tax on your job, your mortgage,


your home and your pension. Where are the middle income tax? --


coming? This is totally desperate stuff. He has nothing to say about


the cost of living crisis. That is the reality. His reshuffle had


nothing to do with the country and everything to do with his party.


After four years of this government we have a recovery people cannot


feel, a cost of living crisis people cannot deny and a prime Minister


people cannot believe. He talks about five years under this


government. We have got record numbers in work. The economy


growing. Record numbers of businesses. Record numbers of women


in work. In this party, the leader reshuffles the party -- the Cabinet.


In his party, the Shadow Cabinet desperately want to reshuffle the


leader. I am sure the right honourable


gentleman is delighted to be lauded in such fashion. It is just like the


old days, Mr Speaker! Mr Speaker, as the prime minister is enjoying a


week in which he is making a lot of new best friends, when he gets to


the Brussels summit, would he give a particularly warm greeting to the


man who may yet be his best, certainly his newest, Mr Juncker,


who yesterday called for more European reform and one applicant


states who want to join the European Union face a complex, difficult and


drawn-out period of up to perhaps five years? As we don't meet before


the Scottish referendum, barring a recall, shouldn't the Scottish


voters bear those words in mind? This is a remarkable moment where


the right honourable gentleman, Jean-Claude Juncker, has said


something with which I wholeheartedly agreed. It is


noticeable what he said. That there would not be new members joining the


European Union and the next five years. That is very important in the


context of the Scottish referendum debate. He says we're not going to


meet again before the Scottish referendum. In terms of my diary, I


think the House of Commons will be in September. Can the prime Minister


explain why he has now given more knighthoods to men that he sacked


and he has given Cabinet jobs to women? Always interesting to take a


lecture from a party that gave a knighthood to Fred Goodwin! I have


appointed more women to the front bench, more women to the Cabinet, on


the basis they deserve those jobs. I want a team that reflects modern


Britain and can be everything that modern Britain needed to be. I make


no apology for saying that I think in public life we should recognise


public service, people who have worked hard, who have contributed to


our nation, our government, I think it is a good thing to do. Mr


Speaker, people with autism have specific social and communications


needs which can cause distress and misunderstanding, particularly when


they are admitted to hospital for a routine or emergency treatment. With


the Prime Minister join me in congratulating Baroness Angela Brown


and the National Autistic Society, who tomorrow are going to launch the


new hospital passport for people with autism? I think that will make


a great difference to a lot of people's lights in this country. I


thank the honourable lady, my right honourable friend, from raising this


issue. Baroness Browning has worked very hard on this issue over the


years, as has my right honourable friend, with the autism Bill, which


is making a huge difference to the way we help young people with these


conditions. I absolutely join her in making sure these services are


properly put together. Given the recent data shows the gender pay gap


is increasing again, can the prime Minister confirm the excellent news


that any woman not receiving equal pay for equal work will have their


salary topped up from Tory party funds? What I would say to the


honourable gentleman is the first of all it is welcome news that under


this government the pay gap and those below the age of 40 has all


but disappeared. We are making progress. In terms of the leader of


the house of lords, I am happy to confirm she would do the same job as


her confirm she would do the


predecessor, and receive the same amount of money. Charlotte Helix is


part of an international research project seeking to establish a link


between the DNA of anorexia nervosa sufferers. This afternoon the


project is coming to Parliament seeking to obtain DNA samples from


former sufferers, including my honourable friend, the member for


Braintree. Will my right honourable friend commend the work done by


Charlotte I very much thank my honourable friend for raising this


issue. I would commend the bravery of all those who have spoken out


about their experience with eating disorders. It is not an easy thing


to do. We need to learn more about his condition so we can provide the


right kind of support, and in that context I think what the government


is doing is important as well. Mr Speaker, we now know for certain


that taxpayers last year were robbed of around ?1 billion because of the


botched Argand basement fire sale of Royal mail. Will he now do as the


select committee have asked, and publish the list of those


preferential investors, and when will somebody be held to account for


this right Royal mail fiasco? I have to say, I just completely disagree


with the honourable gentleman. For year after year, Royal mail lost


money, the taxpayer had to back it up, and we have achieved what no


previous government have achieved, the successful privatisation of the


Royal mail. The taxpayer has received money from that sale and we


now receive the tax on the profits of Royal mail, rather than the


mismanagement of the Labour years. Mr Speaker, later this year in North


Yorkshire will become the best connected county, in terms of


superfast broadband. It is usually helpful for the growing hospitality


and tourism industry, and received a recent boost from the visit of the


Tour de France. Does my right honourable friend agree that rolling


out superfast broadband is a great boost for all sectors, not just


hospitality, to help build on the wonderful economic legacy of the


Tour de France? Can I first of all thank my honourable friend that he


gave me and the people of Harrogate gave me for the Tour de France, the


completion of that final stage, marred only by Mark Cavendish's very


tragic accident in the Tour de France, but it was an extraordinary


event and showed his constituency and the whole of Yorkshire it


absolutely in it best light. We are putting ?790 million into superfast


broadband access, we have around 400,000 new premises being upgraded


every week. I think frankly everyone in this house has a duty to get out


there and help to advertise what is happening with broadband, and to


encourage take-up rates. Thank you, Mr Speaker, it is fundamental, is it


not, that the holder of the office of Attorney General should be fairly


independent, defend the rule of law, and be ready to speak legal truth to


power. Given the distinction and respect with which the holder of


that office pursued that role, what possessed the Prime Minister to


dismiss him yesterday? First of all, can I absolutely say I absolutely


agree with the right honourable gentleman that the Attorney General


gives on varnished, independent advice, but I also believe in


government that when someone has served extremely well for four


years, there are often times when it is right to bring on new talent, and


to make the most of all the talent you have in your party. That is the


approach I take as Simon is to, and I explained that very clearly to my


team. Mr Speaker, the number of young people coming off the


unemployment register across North Yorkshire is at a record high. Would


the Prime Minister agree that today's small business bill,


Conservative inspired, is yet another boost to the women and men


who are creating the jobs to make this happen? I thank my honourable


friend for his question, today's bill will help make the United


Kingdom the most attractive and easy place to start, finance and grow a


small business. That is our ambition. He is absolutely right


about these unemployment figures, in his own constituency, the claimant


count has fallen by 37% in the last year, I50 since the election.


Long-term youth claimant count, because this is the most important


thing, to make that young people are getting those opportunities -- to


make sure, it is down 60% in the last year. The last two European


commissioners from the UK have held major portfolios, central to our


interest. The outgoing commissioner has been the spokesperson for


foreign affairs, and her predecessor helped the trade portfolio. So can I


ask the Prime Minister what post does he hope to secure for his


nominee, Lord Hill, is the consolation prize for his failure to


stop the appointment of Mr Juncker? And how, this time, does he intend


to build support for his objective? First of all, I think it is a good


moment for everyone across the house to pay tribute to Cathy Ashton,


effectively the Foreign Minister for Europe, over the last four years, in


what is a gruelling and exhausting job. I think there is an


opportunity, whether there will be a resolution or not, I don't know, but


I think there is an opportunity to make sure that Britain has an


important portfolio, one where we can maximise our influence in the


areas we care about most, which are areas to do with our economy, and we


will work very hard to do that. I think Lord Hill, with his experience


in the previous Conservative government, and this government,


holding as it is this equivalent post Baroness Ashton held before she


became a Commissioner, will do a very good job for our country. As


you know, my constituency is very dependent on investment in the oil


and gas industry, where the unemployment rate is currently 0.5%.


Therefore the Prime Minister will understand there is some concern


with the reshuffle where both the Treasury Minister and the energy


manager Hull Minister responsible for that industry has changed again


-- the energy minister responsible. I think my honourable friend makes


an important point, North Sea oil is absolutely vital, making sure we


have the tax regime appropriately in place and implementing the Would


review is something we are committed to. -- the Wood review. On the 4th


of August, people from across the country will come together to mark


100 years since the outbreak of the First World War. It is an important


opportunity to commemorate a conflict that changed Britain for


ever. Can I asked the primaries to if he will join for us supporting


the 1418 now lights out campaign, and if he will encourage people


across the UK to turn out their lights between ten and 11pm on the


4th of August, so, as a country, we can pay fitting tribute to those who


sacrificed and serve our country a hundred years ago? I think the


honourable gentleman is right to recommend this campaign, I think it


is a way to get particularly young people engaged in what happened a


century ago, and to understand the consequences for Europe, the world


and our society. There are a lot of events that will take place to


commemorate appropriately the First World War. One of the most


significant will be tomorrow, when the Imperial War Museum, has a major


investment and is reopening for the public. I know my own George and


enjoy going there, many people I hope will make the best of it. With


the Northwest and Cheshire's proud history of contribute in


significantly to our national economy, with my right honourable


friend agree how rapidly the safety of element of fracking is to boost


the competitors of the country, but also in the north-west to continue


to be a significant contributor to our wealth and welfare? My right


honourable friend makes a significant point, and it is true


that in the Northwest we have seen the claimant count in his


constituency come down 40% in the last year, but if we want to sustain


the increase in employment and sustained economic growth, we should


not hold ourselves back from new of energy, including unconventional


gas. And it is striking that in the United States they have something


like 100,000 unconventional gas wells dug, whereas in the whole of


Europe it is something like 100. We have is about three quarters of as


much of unconventional gas in the US there is in America, I don't want us


to miss out. -- in the new as there is in America. -- in the European


Union. Parliament might be about to break down for the summer, but can I


tell the Prime Minister that even that won't stop people having


babies, getting injured and needing routine emergency care on the NHS.


So, in the light of the forthcoming report into safety at Stafford


hospital by the sea QC, can he have a word with his friend, the


Chancellor of the Exchequer, and make sure that the Treasury is going


to fund, in full, the changes to health services across North


Staffordshire that the University hospital in Stoke-on-Trent has to


provide, and which has to provide at no extra cost to the health of


people in Stoke-on-Trent? I take into account what the honourable


lady says, I am regularly advised about the situation in


Staffordshire. Changes need to take place. This inspection is absolutely


vital. I think the important thing in the health service is to not try


to hide problems but properly address them. Today, Bruce Keogh is


reporting a year on from his report when he took something like 11


hospitals into special measures, and what he'll show is that all of them


are making improvements, five of them are able to come out of special


measures, and making sure we make improvements in all of our


hospitals. I thank the Prime Minister for supporting the West


Country, particularly the Railway Inn Dawlish and -- the railway in


Dawlish and broadband. I think the honourable lady makes an


important point. We must continue supporting transport infrastructure


in the south-west. We have the important report on Dawlish coming


out. The work is being done right now, in terms of making sure it is


more resilient. We have had the important announcement about the


sleeper service down to the south-west, and announcement about a


number of other road and rail schemes. I will look very carefully


watches says about fair funding, but it is very important that everyone


can see that these situations are fair. The office will budget


responsible to show that the government's new system of school


fees will add ?15 billion more expected to the government debt than


expected by the end of the parliament. Hasn't the government


got it all wrong when it comes to cherish and fees? What we were told,


Mr Speaker, by the party opposite was that no one would take up these


loans, no one from poorer backgrounds would go to university,


and the numbers going to university would collapse. What has actually


happened is record numbers are going to universities, record numbers from


lower income homes are going. Obviously, we need to make sure that


the system is cost efficient, but I am satisfied it is working, and the


Chancellor announced in his recent budget that far from having problems


with the funding, we are uncapped in the numbers that can go to


university. That is the aspiration society we are building in this


country. Unemployment has more than halved in my constituency since


2010. York is poised to benefit from a multiple Ian Pannell benefit


through three -- multi-million pound benefit. Would my right honourable


friend not agree that this clearly demonstrates our commitment to


tackling the north-South divide, and delivering a northern lead economic


plan? I am delighted to share with my honourable friend that the


claimant count in his constituency is down by 42% over the last year,


and down by 61% since the election. I know Labour don't want to hear


about falling unemployment numbers, the numbers of people in work, but


the fact is every single one of these people getting a job is about


someone having a livelihood and the chance to provide for their family,


that is what this is about. He is absolutely right to raise the


importance of the agricultural industries and linked industries in


Yorkshire. I am sure that the new agriculture and environmental


secretary will want to make an early visit to her birthplace of


Yorkshire. Specialist spinal cord injury beds are a precious resource


for people and patients in desperate need. Why is it, therefore, that on


the Prime Minister's watch, specialist beds at the Stoke


Mandeville spinal injuries centre of being used for people who do not


have spinal cord injuries? Obviously, decisions are for


individual trusts and individual clinical commissioning groups


themselves, but we made two important decisions as a government,


first to fund the NHS with extra money, ?12.7 billion in this


Parliament, and second to abolish the bureaucracy that had built up


under Labour with 17,000 fewer bureaucrats. Both those decisions


were opposed by the Labour Party, but we can see 7000 more doctors,


4000 more nurses, more patients treated and an NHS that is doing


well. Mr Speaker, in the recent case of Nicholson on the question of


assisted dying, Lord Neuberger said that Parliament had the opportunity


to reform the law, in the knowledge that if Parliament does not act, the


courts may. This could raise serious constitutional issues. Does he agree


that whatever your views on the subject, what the public really want


is a debate in this house? First of all, I would say it is good that a


debate is being held and it would be worthwhile reading the debate that


takes place on Friday in the other place. I am very happy for a debate


to be held here, and there are now opportunities for backbenchers to


hold debates in the chamber, and I am sure the new Leader of the House


of Commons, who I am sure we all want to welcome to his place, will


be listening carefully to that request. For myself, I am not


convinced that further steps need to be taken. I worry about legalising


euthanasia, and people might be pushed into things that they don't


actually want for themselves, but by all means let's have the debate. to


returning to the issue of taxes and the wealthy, when will the Prime


Minister publishes tax return? On the subject of taxes and


middle-income people, when will we get an answer from Labour about what


was it the deputy leader of the party meant when she said, and let


me repeat it, that she thinks people on middle incomes should contribute


more through their taxes? There is one party in this house with a big


tax problem and I am looking at it. Given that poor mental health is the


single biggest driver of well-being in this country, Willy act on a


recommendation from the think tank forum and tackle poorly supporting


mental health by this government signing up to the employers mental


health framework? I will look very carefully at the report he mentions.


I think it is important, and he helped to do this in government,


that we now have a situation where mental health is given proper parity


of esteem through the NHS Constitution. We have made good


progress in terms of making available talking therapies for


mental health patients in the NHS. I will look carefully at the report.


a short break in the transmission there. We are not quite sure why. Ed


Miliband when first of all on Michael Gove. He did not get much an


answer from prime Minister. He then went on more to the wider issues of


the economy. Mr Miliband concentrated on how wages, average


earnings, are still trailing prices. The gap has actually got wider


because the CPI measure of inflation rose last month, whereas average


earnings fell last month compared to the previous month. Mr Cameron, of


course, suggesting the positive. He concentrated on the very strong


employment figures that came out today. Let's see what you thought


and then we hear from our guests. Helen Manning says nobody could


describe Ed Miliband as a big beast today. Pour predictable performance


again. He needs a new PR guru. David Axelrod is just not cutting it.


Daniel from Southampton says Ed Miliband was weak again. The


questioning on Michael Gove was boring and did not address any real


issues. He has nothing to say on jobs and the economy. Diane


Richardson from Welwyn Garden City says, shock horror, the Government


front bench slightly more packed with women. Until mid-2015 Cameron


turns me off. Edberg Stone says Rather than saying more people than


ever are in work, wouldn't it be better to say that more people since


1066 are back in work. Statistics do not have time with ordinary voters.


Another reviewer says with all the people in work one would think it


was going great guns. Tax returns will never bring down the deficit,


no matter how many people are in work.


I don't think they do. I may be out on a limb but I don't think they do.


Do you think, Nick, the Prime Minister was fully aware of what we


are all saying... That he was handing a scalp to the educational


establishment by sacking Michael Gove, and a gift to the Labour


Party? I agree with the first part but not the second. Of course he


knew he was handing a gift to the political establishment. He knew


that teachers would be celebrating. I interviewed yesterday -- Michael


Gove yesterday and said to him that many teachers would be having an


extra glass of wine tonight, and he was humorous enough to say that yes,


no doubt they will. He is trying to comfort himself. If you remove a


target, that helps you are electorally. Michael Gove is now not


a target in the general election. What Lynton Crosby and others around


the prime Minister want people who do not distract from the message


about leadership and the economy. Those are the Tories believe are the


two trump cards. Nothing should get in the way. The model is Jeremy


Hunt. Make the health service boring. Keep it out of the news. It


is not quite as high-profile as it was when Lansley was in charge. It


may not be so much in the political news, the political lobby is not so


interested, but there are stories every day about health and rightly


so. It is a big winning issue for them but compared to what it was


like before it is quieter. I can now exclusively reveal what Michael


Gove's status is. Are you a big fan of the Game Of Thrones? Love it. How


can you understand politics if you do not watch it? You are going to


have to collect -- correct do not watch it? You are going to


exclusively reveal that David Cameron, when he asked Michael Gove


to take on the role of Chief Whip, told him that he was a big fan of


Game Of Thrones and he wanted him to be like the hand of the King. This


is the Charles dance character. -- Charles dance. He is the most


powerful person in the seven kingdoms. Can I also point out that


his son takes a crossbow, while he is sitting on the privy, and kills


him. Is that what we mean... The sun kills the Michael Gove character. My


advice to Michael Gove therefore is not to go to the privy! And if he


does go, leave the door open! I have to go online in order to mug up on


this. It is said on the Game Of Thrones website that when there is a


weak leader, the job of the candidate King, Michael Gove, is to


clear up the political mess. And the King makes a bit of a mess and the


hand wipes. Forgive me, but that is the slogan. We have gone to the


lowest common dominator. What they have not taken into account, because


one of the things about the Game Of Thrones is that the women, the


female characters, are really strong. They are not windowdressing,


like some say the Cabinet is. They are a strong women in their own


right. Powerful. Their weapons are their brains and arrows and nights


as well. They are not beyond a bit of killing. Michael Gove's wife,


Sarah Vine, columnist, re-tweeted a -- an article this morning in which


the headline was, a shabby days work which Cameron will live to regret.


If that is not out of Game Of Thrones I don't know what it is. US


certainly tempting me to find out more about Game Of Thrones! You are


still watching the uneven line! I can remember it! Does it still


linger on as a problem for the Government? The history of these


sorts of reshuffles is it depends how the people who suffer react.


Michael is being told he is in the heart of government. He will be at


meetings twice a day. I believe they intend to have him. He is a valuable


political strategist. Will he find it unsatisfying and frustrating? He


has had his profile reduced. He is too controversial before the


election. To be fair to him, I don't recall is Secretary of State for


education who did anything that was not unpopular with the teaching


unions. Back in the dark ages, I have been Secretary of State for


education myself, and I was not the pin-up of the teachers trade unions


introducing grant-maintained schools. Reshuffles otherwise are


over within a couple of days of them taking place. They fascinate the


political bubble, the establishment, on quite a considerable scale


because the celebrity culture nowadays is all. The average members


of the public will not remember who did what job or who is doing it now.


You do not think it will cut through? It contains the message


there are a lot more women about. It is the economy, stupid. That is what


this election is about. You are trying to suggest there are new


crises and which they have never been before. Western democracy,


people believe health care is in crisis. It is constantly changing,


higher pressures, you are going up an escalator going downwards,


infinite demand... You always have turbulent emotional politics in


health. What matters is the recovery from the recession. We have this


simplistic argument, should people be feeling better off now to the


answer is, if only it weren't so easy. You have got to have several


more years of constructing a modern, competitive economy. That is


the only way of raising lifestyles, not Ed Miliband talking about


prices. I welcome the new jobs. It is always better to be in work if


you can then be on benefits. People are not seeing a difference. What


they think is unfair is they see people at the top getting tax cuts


and they feel that they are benefiting a lot more than ordinary


people. But they will. We should have been doing a lot more in


earlier on in terms of getting the skills that people need, building


the right infrastructure, really getting banks lending to businesses


and businesses investing, too. I think we have not seen anywhere near


enough progress on that. It is all very well saying to people that they


need to wait a few more years. Can you shed any light on what Harriet


Harman meant when he -- when she said on the radio that people on


middle incomes should contribute more? I would imagine she was saying


that we have a progressive tax system in this country and if you


did not want that we would have a flat rate of tax. She was not saying


that we wanted to tax people on middle incomes more. Why would you


put it that way though? It -- it has always been the case in this country


that people on middle incomes pay more. That is what happens at the


moment. She is not proposing they are going to be taxing people on


middle incomes more. Harriet has caused a little consternation. She


does need to explain why she said it. You do contribute more in a


progressive tax system. You wonder why she would say it. She was on LBC


on July the 14th. It was in an answer about work working class


people on middle class people get back from the tax system in terms of


public services. She debating with the idea that middle-income people


do not get anything back in return for what they contribute. The quote


says that yes, people on middle incomes should contribute more


through their taxes. I have not seen it in its full context. Can be


interpreted either way. Unless you support a flat rate tax system...


Final thought from Munich before the summer months? What is telling about


it is simply the determination of the Tories that they were not on the


back foot today, and that Ed Miliband went into the summer still


relatively speaking on the back foot. He will not be pleased that


people are having their incomes squeezed but pleased that it


confirms what he has warned about. The Tories will feel they got


through a difficult day. Michael Gove been shelved out. Ed Miliband


did not get one of those victories. Damian McBride said the other day


that every week was a test. This week the Labour Party will not be


able to save a won. I don't think their loss.


When Will Mr Miliband see Mr Obama in the White House? Next week. I am


not sure which of them has the most political difficulties. He has not


got a narrative is that once you get onto the economy, poor old Ed


Miliband is all at sea. I disagree. Have a nice summer, I hope


Parliament is not recalled and heft as you again -- I have to see you


again. We are sitting on "abundant shales


at depth", according But should we be fracking it,


or leaving well alone? The fashion designer,


Vivienne Westwood, has been touring the country to try


and raise awareness about shale gas We will be speaking to Vivienne


in a moment, but first, Here is her soapbox. This is shale


gas mining in the USA, otherwise known as fracking. It involves


pumping water, sand and chemicals down a well at high pressure to


fracture the rocks and extract gas trapped within them. This mining is


widespread in the USA, and our government wants to do it here. Back


in 2011, shale gas exploration was halted in Blackpool. A report


concluded that fracking had most likely caused two minor earthquakes.


There are also concerns that water supplies close to drilling could


become polluted by the dangerous chemicals used for extraction, and


with methane gas, as is the case here. Fracking is an issue that


concerns all of us, not just politicians in Westminster. It will


lead to the production of more fossil fuels, which will hasten


climate change. We need to wage war on climate change, and the first


battle is to stop politicians from forcing fracking upon us. That is


why I joined anti-fracking road testers at the village of all, in


West Sussex last year, -- Balcombe, where there were plans for


exploratory drilling. 48% of British people don't know what fracking is,


yet the government wants to inflict it upon us without explanation.


There is no democratic mandate for fracking. David Cameron said he was


going to create the greenest government ever, but has instead


supported the shale gas industry. And we're joined now


in the studio by Vivienne Westwood. Welcome to the programme. You talk


there about the dangers of fracking at the Royal Society and Royal


Academy of engineering have reviewed the risks, particularly the ones you


talked about, tremors and water contamination. Do you agree that


those health risks perhaps look less romantic than originally thought


when fracking was first raised as an option? Absolutely not, the opposite


is true -- less traumatic. Heavy volume shale gas extraction has only


been going on for eight years. It is a new industry. When it started,


that is when everyone joined in to it in America, and it was only for


eight years that this was going on. What we have found in America is


that it has now plateaued, it has peaked, and so there were hundreds


of people who tried to set up and get this stuff out of the ground,


which they did. But now they are all getting into debt, because they have


to keep drilling more and more, they can't service their debt. So it is


not a success, let's just say that anyway, but that is not what you


asked B. The evidence for pollution is incredible -- not what you asked


me. The evidence for pollution is incredible in America, people have


denied it, but the statistics are overwhelming. The risks have been


reviewed here, and they say they can be managed effectively. We have


spoken to companies who feel that the risks of tremors are minimal,


and water contamination, but do you think, despite what Vivienne


Westwood says, it could be a game changer here in the way many people


think it has been in the States? I think it good. We still have to


prove it is extractable in the quantity it potentially could be. I


think it is a no-brainer. It is not a new technology. We have been


injecting water and a mix of chemicals into the geology for 40 or


50 years. It can be done properly, it does not have these environmental


hazards. While I think today we are a healthy, democratic society, if we


had today's planning law and debating system in the 19th


century, we would never have had the Industrial Revolution, and here we


have a potentially hugely valuable national resource. It can be


extracted perfectly safely, and it could make a big contribution to our


economy, and we can't have a debate for years and years and years about


fanciful notions of what has gone wrong, which nobody in America would


recognise. Vivienne Westwood also said you are hardly the greenest


government ever, that David Cameron promised. Do you agree that has


gone? We are in favour of cutting carbon emissions, we have set


targets for that. I would point out the Americans have reduce to their


carbon emissions going for the shale gas. No, they haven't. The Germans


who have gone for renewables on a monster scale have seen their


emissions go up. Our government is committed to international targets,


but we need to pursue them in a sensible position. Vivienne, you are


holding your head in your hands in despair, why? Because it is all


completely wrong, everything Kenneth has just said is completely wrong.


First of all, it has only happened for eight years, you check it,


high-volume, it is the difference between... The power involved is the


difference between riding a horse and cart or a Turbo racing car. It


is incredibly different. That has been happening for only eight years.


Apart from which, the point about this fracking is that there are 400


times more for clients in our little country than there are in America.


For clients, that is what happened in Blackpool -- four times more full


clients -- fault lines. Liz Kendall, do you have any worries about it? I


support fracking so much as we regulate it properly. We need to do


that alongside a big issues like carbon capture and storage and


renewables. It was interesting what Ken said about other countries, one


of the reasons Germany has made such progress on renewables, it has


massive private sector investment alongside public investment, because


it has a clear, long-term target, and that is the point where I think


the government has fallen down. Germany is building 12 new


late-night coal plants, which is the dirtiest coal in the world. Fracking


is dirtier than coal. It produces more pollution, because of the


methane leakage. We are going to leave it there, but Vivienne


Westwood, thank you. O God, all right then.


You call him the wrong person for the job.


You condemn his appointment as a "mistake".


This evening David Cameron is off to Brussels, where he's due to


meet the man he tried, but failed, to block as European Commission


But here at the Daily Politics, we don't like to spare politicians'


blushes, so we've put together a compilation of some more of those


It is six months. You can't say anything about the immigrants,


because all these Eastern Europeans are coming in. You should never have


put me with that bigoted woman, whose idea was that? Just


ridiculous. I am mortified by what has happened, I have given her my


sincere apologies. I misunderstood watches said, and she has accepted.


-- what she said. I did not have sexual relations with


that woman. Indeed, I did have a relationship with her, in fact it


was wrong. I liked the music. Was that Perry


Como or Andy Williams? I can't remember. What has been your most


awkward political Inkatha? It was a little bit awkward when the new


Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond, twice called me Rachel Reeves on


question Time -- political encounter. More embarrassing for him


than me. Awkward? When my mum came and helped in the general election,


she was doing some telephone canvassing, and some they had said


something not particularly nice about me, and she said that is my


daughter you are talking about, at which point I had to remove her from


the telephone. That is what mums are there for. Ken, you only have 40


order years of an awkward moment -- 40 years. I have had people shout


silly things at me when campaigning. I have met constituents in the most


extraordinary places. You still have time. Forgetting people 's names, I


have that all the time. That happens all the time, George! Absolutely.


It's time to put you out of your misery, and give you


The one o'clock news is starting over on BBC One now.


Now, there's no Daily Politics on Thursday and Friday, as we make


But I am here tomorrow night, with Michael Portillo and


Alan Johnson joining me for This Week at 11.25 pm on BBC One, that's


And I am back next Monday and Tuesday for two final


Imagine the number of women this industry supports.


This World investigates the true cost of fashion.


It took less than 90 seconds for the eight-storey building to collapse.


Download Subtitles