24/05/2012 Dragon's Eye


24/05/2012

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 24/05/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

The former leader of Cardiff Council is warning that the

:00:02.:00:04.

authority's decision to pull plans for a business district could

:00:04.:00:08.

damage confidence in the city. Rodney Berman, who lost power in

:00:08.:00:11.

this month's election, says it may be harder to attract financial

:00:11.:00:13.

companies to the capital unless the new Labour administration

:00:13.:00:18.

reconsiders. But the council says "the new administration is business

:00:18.:00:21.

savvy and it will be reviewing all the Council's projects to ensure

:00:21.:00:24.

that they are fit for purpose and have a real prospect of being

:00:24.:00:34.
:00:34.:00:44.

It was said it was a crazy scheme. The government of the day creating

:00:44.:00:53.

an enterprise zone on the Docklands. 20 Oddy has made a Canary Wharf is

:00:53.:00:58.

becoming the preferred site for the world's banks. Plans for the

:00:58.:01:04.

Cardiff District might be less grand. Cardiff's call exchange was

:01:04.:01:08.

once the centre of commercial life in the city. In more recent times

:01:08.:01:13.

the capital has been fairly successful in attracting businesses

:01:13.:01:16.

particularly from the financial services. But the business district

:01:16.:01:21.

has been put on hold by the newly elected council. Some economists

:01:21.:01:28.

warned that private business must be involved. If this was purely

:01:28.:01:32.

backed by council, I don't think it will work. We have to have private

:01:32.:01:35.

sector investment so other organisations see people are

:01:35.:01:38.

willing to put their money where their mouth is. That will pump

:01:38.:01:46.

confidence through the project. It is a bit like Canary Wharf. We have

:01:46.:01:49.

seen this in Scotland as well. It is led by private sector

:01:49.:01:55.

development. Cardiff Council will invest millions around this area in

:01:55.:02:01.

a bid to attract professional services. One of the things we were

:02:01.:02:06.

developing was a financial model that meant �30 million was going in

:02:06.:02:09.

from the council and the Welsh Government. That was dependent on

:02:09.:02:14.

plans we had going for it. If the new administration is not went to

:02:14.:02:19.

carry on with these plans, if to fulfil some pledges on reducing

:02:19.:02:23.

council tax, those plans are going to be scrapped. The people of

:02:23.:02:27.

Cardiff need to know that. But has not made clear when people were

:02:27.:02:31.

voting in the election. The Lib- Dems reset it as First Minister's

:02:31.:02:40.

Questions. You government gave a vote of confidence and to the

:02:40.:02:47.

council for this investment zone. This morning Cardiff council

:02:47.:02:50.

announced it has scrapped the plans and delaying the creation of those

:02:50.:02:55.

thousands of new jobs. How will you deliver an enterprise zone in

:02:55.:02:58.

Cardiff Central business District give Cardiff does not have a

:02:58.:03:03.

central business district? It has a District business for -- business

:03:03.:03:09.

District. We will continue to advance Cardiff as a business

:03:09.:03:14.

district as we have done in the months gone past. The Welsh

:03:14.:03:17.

Government and Cardiff Council are keen to build on the base the

:03:17.:03:23.

capital has. Some say the ideas of the enterprise zone and the

:03:23.:03:28.

business District need to be joined up. You had the Cardiff business

:03:28.:03:34.

District where we weren't sure if you were going to have enterprise

:03:34.:03:38.

zones. If the two had come about at the same time this issue will not

:03:38.:03:44.

be there. We would be singing from the same hymn sheet. Because it was

:03:44.:03:47.

tacked on after words there is an overlap of when one's

:03:47.:03:53.

responsibility ends. By that things the new Labour administration's

:03:53.:03:58.

decision could damage the city. -- Rodney Berman thinks. You don't

:03:58.:04:05.

want to put a lack of confidence in investors. We also batsman always

:04:05.:04:15.
:04:15.:04:15.

envisaged it as a 15 year project. The training floor here may have

:04:15.:04:21.

long since given way to live music events and functions better it is

:04:21.:04:24.

traits of a different kind that is coming under the spotlight. If some

:04:24.:04:31.

are demanding the time is right for a Europe-wide transaction time. UK

:04:31.:04:35.

Government is fighting proposals from Europe to introduce the tax.

:04:35.:04:42.

It will hit London but only -- over sent to 5% of transactions occur. -

:04:42.:04:48.

- over 75%. Can you tell us where you stand on that EU-wide

:04:48.:04:55.

transaction tax? Are you with Francois Hollande or with the two

:04:55.:05:01.

leaders of London? It does make sense as long as it is applied as

:05:01.:05:08.

broadly as possible. It should include North America as well.

:05:08.:05:12.

have argued that companies will simply move of the tax is applied

:05:12.:05:16.

only in Europe. Critics say with his is you hovering over the head

:05:16.:05:20.

of the financial sector if it could make companies less likely to

:05:20.:05:24.

expand to cities, including Cardiff. It has been compared to inducing

:05:24.:05:29.

HGVs tax in France. They would never put up with it. If we think

:05:29.:05:38.

of the income we get from financial services, a significant proportion

:05:38.:05:46.

of tax come from the sector. Then to be country -- regrowth

:05:46.:05:49.

Manufacturing, until we have grown other sectors of the economy to

:05:49.:05:54.

compensate, to think of it financial-services tax is

:05:54.:06:02.

absolutely mad. If you do decide what kind of society we want to

:06:02.:06:05.

create a stir up I we're rebuilding the economy with a business-as-

:06:05.:06:15.
:06:15.:06:19.

usual approach or a more equity this society? Only working

:06:19.:06:24.

people,... It seems bizarre to me that speculative behaviour by City

:06:24.:06:30.

financiers and not curved or taxed in any way. Cardiff may not be able

:06:30.:06:33.

to rival London for financial- services but it can compete with

:06:33.:06:40.

other large cities across Europe. Brian Meechan reporting. I spoke to

:06:40.:06:42.

Mark Barry, an idependant business consultant and transport advisor to

:06:42.:06:51.

the Cardiff Business Partnership, and business analyst Simon Evans.

:06:51.:06:55.

What is your reaction to the decision by Cardiff Council to put

:06:55.:07:01.

their plans for a financial zone on hold? I am quite disappointed. The

:07:01.:07:05.

eyes of the world around Cardiff as the Olympic torch can see it. At

:07:05.:07:12.

this is something that was heralded, when it was announced, as a huge

:07:12.:07:17.

investment into the economy are Cardiff. It was something that was

:07:17.:07:22.

very much needed. However, what I will temper that with his, the plan

:07:23.:07:26.

and the project has to be the right one and it has to be a foundation

:07:26.:07:30.

that is laid for the future not something that is the scheme that

:07:30.:07:39.

has built for some what is clear. What is clear, private sector

:07:39.:07:44.

involvement is something that has not been nailed down. Maybe we can

:07:44.:07:50.

pick up on that in the second. We have seen the Welsh Government

:07:50.:07:55.

outline its plans for Ray financial zone, we are left with a single set

:07:55.:08:01.

of plans. There's that makes sense in that way? -- does that make

:08:01.:08:08.

sense in that way? We could bring ideas and to create a single

:08:08.:08:12.

function that can deliver for Cardiff. This could be the most

:08:12.:08:16.

transforming project in the city. It is important. There is time to

:08:16.:08:20.

reflect on what was proposed before, catch our best batsmen breath and

:08:20.:08:27.

put it in place. We don't need to rush into this. I am glad we have

:08:27.:08:33.

this opportunity now to see where - - whether the scheme is not working

:08:33.:08:37.

as it should be first up the need to see where the private sector can

:08:37.:08:43.

come in. It is better to know now sue can make sure the scheme works

:08:43.:08:52.

right in the future. We want something that is good for business

:08:52.:08:57.

in Wales and something that is good for the economy. How do put your

:08:57.:09:00.

best foot forward particularly in uncertain times where there seems

:09:00.:09:05.

to be a lot of business confidence and the reluctance with diseases to

:09:05.:09:11.

commit money? The challenge is, think where this place could be in

:09:11.:09:16.

2025. Cardiff will be competing in Manchester, Barcelona, Milan. What

:09:16.:09:25.

do we have to put in place to eight make it end attracted this is

:09:25.:09:35.

region? -- to make it unattractive business region. 1.4 million people

:09:35.:09:40.

can get to work in this location. We have to be internationally

:09:40.:09:50.
:09:50.:09:51.

We have access to the city of London. By 2020 we could be saying

:09:51.:09:56.

Cardiff, it is just under two hours from at Canary Wharf. You can sell

:09:56.:10:02.

that. Is that how you get businesses involved at ground level

:10:02.:10:09.

before a brick has been made? Absolutely. Infrastructure and

:10:09.:10:13.

confidence are key. Businesses have to be involved. We saw the

:10:13.:10:17.

development of Canary Wharf, there was a key financials institution

:10:17.:10:22.

who was part of it from the on said. We need the faint -- the same to

:10:23.:10:29.

happen here in Cardiff. If they knew they had excellent transport

:10:29.:10:32.

links those things and key for the private sector. Added to that a

:10:32.:10:37.

great talent of Labour we have in Wales, for them to tap into all of

:10:37.:10:42.

those things that are important. We need that private sector confidence.

:10:42.:10:46.

When your company to comment and make sure this scheme can forge

:10:46.:10:51.

ahead. Do you see an appetite for that? Anyone who is interested in

:10:52.:10:57.

the city will be interested to contribute to help. It is going to

:10:57.:11:04.

be vital to have been put in. It is going to be accelerated. You need

:11:04.:11:08.

to build a team with a capability and expertise and network to talk

:11:08.:11:14.

to it the professional services, not just in South Wales but in

:11:14.:11:18.

London, Europe and North America a stop we need to present them with a

:11:18.:11:24.

compelling offer. We have the time to put the right plan in place.

:11:24.:11:30.

you share that optimism? I do. We are a proud nation in Wales and we

:11:30.:11:35.

are going for it. We have the same political colour in Cardiff Bay as

:11:35.:11:40.

we have in Cardiff centre. That is important. His us likes to see

:11:40.:11:46.

confidence and stability. -- business. The developmentof the

:11:46.:11:49.

Welsh and and wider UK economies depends a great deal on what

:11:49.:11:52.

happens in the Eurozone. Last night EU leaders attended an informal

:11:52.:11:55.

summit where they were supposed to be talking about how to stimulate

:11:55.:11:58.

growth, but the uncertainty about Greece and whether it will fall out

:11:58.:12:02.

of the single currency will have figured largely in discussions.

:12:02.:12:10.

Michael Arghyrou is an economist at Cardiff Business School.

:12:10.:12:15.

Welcome. It does explain as you would like what happens in Greece

:12:15.:12:20.

matters to us in Wales's it is important and I can do you are a

:12:20.:12:26.

few examples. If this situation continues and escalate, the global

:12:26.:12:30.

economy faces the prospect of a new credit crunch. Interest rates may

:12:31.:12:35.

go all up and this will directly affect Welsh businesses, Welsh

:12:35.:12:40.

mortgages and personal loans. That is the first important challenge

:12:40.:12:47.

which the Welsh economy will be affected. The second is the

:12:47.:12:52.

eurozone which is affected by the Greek situation is the UK's largest

:12:52.:12:58.

trading partner. If that is short of money you will export last. It

:12:58.:13:03.

will affect job prospects and the Welsh economy, living standards.

:13:03.:13:06.

What are the likely scenario is facing the eurozone in relation to

:13:06.:13:14.

the dangers that Greece's posing? There are two possibilities. Their

:13:14.:13:18.

first is that the Greek elections which will take place on 17th June

:13:18.:13:23.

will produce a pro-European government. In which case, I would

:13:23.:13:25.

expect the emergence of a new compromise between Greece and the

:13:25.:13:32.

you. Police will remain part of the eurozone. We will hope for the best.

:13:32.:13:35.

It will not solve the situation overnight but it will give them

:13:35.:13:40.

further time. Where they Greece will take that up is another

:13:40.:13:44.

discussion. The worst-case scenario is the situation where we have five

:13:45.:13:50.

they hung parliament off -- or the emergence of a left-wing government.

:13:50.:13:56.

In which case, negotiations may break down. We will be in uncharted

:13:56.:14:02.

territory. Greece may leave the eurozone. If Greece were to lead

:14:02.:14:06.

the eurozone what could that mean? For Greece, it will be very bad.

:14:06.:14:12.

Although one can make an economic argument a new currency would give

:14:12.:14:19.

competitiveness, there will be large negative welfare consequences.

:14:19.:14:26.

The Greek money will be devalued. The Greek state will go bankrupt

:14:26.:14:32.

and that will cut of credit to the banks. It will be dramatic. For the

:14:32.:14:36.

eurozone it will be also very difficult because you have a fee of

:14:36.:14:41.

contagion. The problem is people and Portugal, Spain, possibly Italy

:14:41.:14:46.

as well, was that if they give Greece have left we may be the next

:14:46.:14:53.

ones to leave the stock it will bring in uncertainty. A presumably

:14:53.:14:58.

the governments of the United Kingdom and the difference eurozone

:14:58.:15:00.

countries will be drawing up contingency plans at this stage to

:15:00.:15:06.

do with a possibly worse case scenario. At this stage nobody will

:15:06.:15:12.

confirm officially that these plans are shaped and Abbey worked on. I

:15:12.:15:17.

would be surprised if those contingency plans went made now.

:15:17.:15:21.

There are things that the UK Government can do in the event of a

:15:22.:15:26.

Greek exit from the eurozone or other European countries. I am

:15:26.:15:32.

pretty sure what the authorities are doing now here will be to

:15:32.:15:41.

In the meantime, our politicians left crossing their fingers for

:15:41.:15:47.

that outcome of the elections on 17th June? Yes, they are. Thank you

:15:47.:15:52.

for joining us this evening. Thousands of families in Wales need

:15:52.:15:57.

a home, but either can't afford one or fined one suitable. This week,

:15:57.:16:00.

the Welsh government published its plans to get to grips with the

:16:00.:16:05.

issue. Part of that included bringing back into use 22,000 empty

:16:05.:16:12.

homes. To do that, one idea is to that allow local authorities to

:16:12.:16:15.

charge 200% council tax on any house that has been empty for more

:16:15.:16:22.

than two years. They are a blight in many towns and

:16:22.:16:32.
:16:32.:16:32.

villages. Homes lying empty. There are 22,000 empty homes in

:16:32.:16:37.

Wales like this one. There was governments say not only are their

:16:37.:16:41.

untidy, but they are also wasteful. There are thousands of families in

:16:41.:16:46.

need of a home so ministers have now said that sites like this one

:16:46.:16:49.

are no longer acceptable. What to do about it is a lot more

:16:49.:16:54.

difficult. It is a tremendous waste of resources when we realise we

:16:54.:17:00.

have a shortage of family homes of all kinds, for sale and for rent.

:17:00.:17:05.

We need to first of all taken interest free loan regime from the

:17:05.:17:08.

assembly so that the owners of those properties can be assisted

:17:08.:17:11.

financially to do up those properties for use so that families

:17:11.:17:17.

can use them. Also we are aware that if that is the carrot, there

:17:17.:17:23.

may be a necessity for some element of a stick as well. The stick in

:17:23.:17:27.

question is to give councils the right to increase council tax on

:17:27.:17:31.

homes like this one which have been empty for over one year.

:17:31.:17:35.

figures we have looked at in the past has been looking to increase

:17:35.:17:40.

it up to 200% and that is something that would then provide you with

:17:40.:17:45.

the finance you require to do the necessary work on the owls. It

:17:45.:17:49.

would also create a funding stream where this could be an ongoing

:17:49.:17:55.

thing. You are not talking about one house in one street, but rather

:17:55.:18:01.

an area or. Some towns and villages have a collection of houses that

:18:01.:18:11.
:18:11.:18:11.

need to be tackled. These ideas are outlined in the Welsh government

:18:11.:18:16.

plan is to give councils the ability to charge up to two men do

:18:16.:18:19.

percent on homes that have been empty for over one year.

:18:19.:18:23.

Councils could be able to set their own rates, but the government think

:18:23.:18:28.

they could raise up to �33 million by doing that which could then be

:18:28.:18:32.

ring-fenced and the money used to pay for more affordable homes.

:18:32.:18:37.

Not everyone thinks that is fair. Many thinks it Geoff catch all tax

:18:37.:18:42.

could do as much harm as good. Recently we have spoken to a family

:18:42.:18:46.

who have bought her a second home with in their locality purely so

:18:46.:18:49.

that they can have some were for their children to come back and

:18:49.:18:55.

live near to them after they finish their studies. There are different

:18:55.:19:01.

situations. There is also the issue of local families inheriting homes

:19:01.:19:05.

where they want to retain that home again so that they provide

:19:05.:19:12.

somewhere for their children to come back to. Council tax go to all

:19:13.:19:17.

kinds of services, but if a house is empty, you don't use those

:19:17.:19:23.

services. The point is, you pay your council tax to get services.

:19:23.:19:27.

If you have an empty home, you are not using services yet still paying

:19:27.:19:31.

for them. The point is that doubling council tax for up empty

:19:31.:19:35.

houses is a double tax which will not solve the problems and business

:19:35.:19:41.

using the tax system. The tax system is there to pay for services

:19:41.:19:44.

it we use in everyday life, not as a punishment because you are using

:19:44.:19:49.

your house in the way that the government does not want. The real

:19:49.:19:55.

problem is not any kind of revenue shortage, it is a shortage of homes.

:19:55.:19:59.

We don't want to collect council tax on these homes, we want them to

:19:59.:20:04.

stop being empty and get back into the market or on to the rental

:20:04.:20:09.

market for used by wealthy families. They have been calls for higher

:20:09.:20:13.

council tax on second homes as well, even though the government said it

:20:13.:20:18.

is not included in the White Paper. My discussions with the minister

:20:18.:20:23.

over recent months is that he did not warm to the idea. Arrested on a

:20:23.:20:27.

number of occasions and you could see the collaboration between the

:20:27.:20:32.

ability to raise funds on those houses that I am occupied for large

:20:32.:20:37.

periods of the year to then produce this fund that will give us the

:20:37.:20:42.

ability to build affordable homes for local people.

:20:42.:20:47.

Building more affordable homes is a tricky enough business for councils

:20:47.:20:51.

like this protest last year demonstrates. More money may help

:20:51.:20:55.

the local authorities, but even then, convincing people to allow

:20:55.:20:58.

are affordable homes to be built might be a different matter

:20:58.:21:04.

altogether. Joining me now, Peter Black of the

:21:04.:21:07.

Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives Nick Ramsey.

:21:07.:21:12.

Nick Ramsey, what do you make of the idea of doubling council tax on

:21:12.:21:17.

NT properties? I find it strange. I concede the principle behind his

:21:17.:21:22.

white paper and why the government want to have more homes, sadly the

:21:22.:21:26.

previous government built their Fracture -- fraction of the homes

:21:26.:21:32.

we need, but doubling council tax risks penalising people rather than

:21:32.:21:36.

providing extra housing. If you decide that you want to use council

:21:36.:21:41.

tax in that way, why stick to an arbitrary after 12 months limit and

:21:41.:21:47.

why stick to 200%? I fear a lot of people will be caught out by this.

:21:47.:21:51.

Peter Black, what you make of the argument of the misuse of council

:21:51.:22:01.
:22:01.:22:02.

tax? I don't accept that it is a misuse of council tax. I think

:22:02.:22:06.

local authorities need to have a stake to encourage homeowners who

:22:06.:22:11.

have left house is empty for a substantial period of time. I do

:22:11.:22:16.

agree that 12 months is too short a period. Councils already have the

:22:16.:22:21.

power to introduce his after 12 months, but what we need is maybe

:22:21.:22:25.

after five years. There are a substantial number of properties

:22:25.:22:29.

made empty for five years that are a blight on the community and are

:22:29.:22:33.

imposing quite a few problems for the neighbours. In those instances

:22:33.:22:37.

where the owners of homes have been reluctant to bring them back into

:22:37.:22:41.

use, having missed it available as a means to encouraging them to do

:22:41.:22:46.

so is a very useful tool. In those circumstances I would favour of

:22:46.:22:53.

this provision. Mick, what you make of a five-year threshold? T a prose

:22:53.:23:01.

it in principle? I agree with Peter that 12 months is too short. As for

:23:01.:23:06.

five years, I don't think enough analysis has been done to decipher

:23:06.:23:10.

whether council tax is the right mechanism. Peter calls this a big

:23:10.:23:14.

stick, it is a massive stake. Where are the government going down the

:23:14.:23:20.

line of trying to pass regulation, legislation and forcing people who

:23:20.:23:26.

have empty houses out of their homes by raising council tax. What

:23:26.:23:30.

they should be doing is liaising with their owners and find out why

:23:30.:23:34.

the houses are empty and then move forward in a way that is far more

:23:35.:23:39.

collegiate than this. It is an authoritarian, we don't want you to

:23:39.:23:45.

have this and we will drive you out. There is a long tradition of using

:23:45.:23:49.

taxes to us at -- incentive eyes certain behaviours. Labour

:23:49.:23:52.

governments have used taxes in that way as have Conservative

:23:52.:24:00.

governments. Not for council tax to be used like that. The purpose of

:24:00.:24:05.

council tax is a top-up tax to the many that councils get from central

:24:05.:24:09.

government. Council tax has never been used by this and the point was

:24:09.:24:14.

made earlier, that if you are using council tax to pay for services, if

:24:14.:24:19.

a house is empty for a year, then people who are owned that house on

:24:19.:24:24.

not getting any service. Peter Black, what would you do to try to

:24:24.:24:29.

tackle the issue of empty houses? A five-year period, some might say,

:24:30.:24:34.

is too generous for houses sitting empty in communities where there

:24:34.:24:40.

are people who would love to be able to live but cannot get a house.

:24:40.:24:43.

I still think there are thousands of homes that can be bought back

:24:43.:24:49.

into use. We have to allow for the use where people have inherited

:24:49.:24:54.

houses. We also have to allow for people to improve their homes so it

:24:54.:24:59.

may remain empty for longer than 12 months, but I do agree, we can't

:24:59.:25:03.

have this as the only tool in the box. There has to be a proper

:25:04.:25:08.

strategy are making use of a range of tools including the recyclable

:25:08.:25:18.
:25:18.:25:19.

loan scheme. Including the use of compulsory purchase, or and also

:25:19.:25:23.

having an empty properties officer in every local authority who is

:25:23.:25:28.

working with owners to bring homes back into use. If all else fails,

:25:28.:25:32.

we have to have that stick to encourage owners and give them a

:25:32.:25:36.

little prod to say that if you carry on it will cost you more

:25:36.:25:41.

money to leave this house empty. I have to tell you that many homes

:25:41.:25:47.

are Blyton the community and a lot of those have been empty up to 25

:25:47.:25:53.

years. That is unacceptable when people are looking for a home.

:25:53.:25:55.

grateful to you both for joining us this evening.

:25:55.:26:04.

Now, let's move over here and talk to Betsan, our political editor. So,

:26:04.:26:09.

we are expecting a Green Paper on rearrangement of assembly

:26:09.:26:15.

constituency boundaries. Give us the background. The UK government

:26:15.:26:18.

start of it consultation into what the boundaries ought to look like

:26:18.:26:24.

in Wales. It is not about empty homes, but constituencies that they

:26:24.:26:31.

think might be to fall or to empty. Looking at Cardiff South, 76 people.

:26:31.:26:37.

They have to consider that as the argument. The consultation paper

:26:37.:26:44.

has been revealed. She says she has an open mind and also has in mind

:26:44.:26:49.

and elegance situation and simple saying it -- solution of 30

:26:49.:26:54.

constituents rather than the 40 that we have now. And 20 Am's

:26:54.:27:02.

chosen from the region. 31st past the post Am's. The other parties

:27:02.:27:06.

all have ideas that are slightly different and ideas as to who

:27:06.:27:10.

should be making these decisions and the first place. Yes, because

:27:10.:27:15.

they are claims and counter-claims about what these proposals mean for

:27:15.:27:20.

different parties interests in terms of electoral success.

:27:20.:27:25.

Precisely. It is a big if as to whether constituencies for

:27:25.:27:30.

Westminster will change. If they do, the thought was that she will not

:27:30.:27:35.

have 40 MPs anymore so that will change to 30, should the Assembly

:27:35.:27:39.

changed as well? We have Labour and Plaid Cymru saying it is not up to

:27:39.:27:46.

the UK to -- Westminster to decide this at all. If changed, there

:27:46.:27:50.

should be 30 constituencies and to first past the palace from those

:27:50.:27:55.

constituencies. The other parties are saying they are getting rid of

:27:55.:28:01.

any proportionality, and he will suffer, us. The Lib Dems saying it

:28:01.:28:05.

proportionality must remain important. He might have a

:28:05.:28:08.

situation where the assembly changes and the Westminster ones do

:28:08.:28:15.

not. Then it will get complex. Because of arguments over reform of

:28:15.:28:21.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS