21/10/2013 Inside Out Yorkshire and Lincolnshire


Is lax enforcement and testing leading to the spread of bovine TB? Could energy shortages see the resurgence of coal? Why was JB Priestley sacked from the BBC during WWII?

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 21/10/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!



Good evening and welcome to Inside officers come into


Good evening and welcome to Inside Out, I'm Toby Foster and tonight, we


are in the Yorkshire Dales. This week, with energy bills on the rise


and wondering if the lights would go out, could we return to coal mining


to bridge the gap? We speak to the energy producers trying to plan for


an uncertain future. The energy policy that we do not have in the


UK, that means the decision has been taken away from the UK and there is


a lack of investment. Also tonight, I threat to our


countryside ` we discover evidence that enforcement measures to combat


bovine TB are not working. It took 174 days between our fun getting its


first instance of TB and my neighbours having to be tested. That


is a ridiculous timescale. And a war of words, why the


broadcaster JB Priestley incurred the wrath of Winston Churchill.


Yorkshire is home to one of only three deep coal mines left in the


country at Kellingley. It seems that coal`mining might have been


consigned to the history books but it still produces the biggest


percentage of electricity we use so could a return to coal`mining be on


the cards for Britain? And if not, do we risk the lights going out and


even bigger energy bills? Most of us don't question where it comes from,


only how much it's costing us. But as winter approaches, experts warn


electricity supplies are at dangerously low levels and any surge


in demand could lead to blackouts. It is not scaremongering, it is


scary as a matter of fact. I personally believe there is a risk


of lights going out in the next decade. The Government is searching


for ways to produced low`cost renewable energy and these things


aren't easy. In the last ten years, energy costs


have spiralled amid the rising cost of fuel suppliers as they battle to


meet emission targets, replacing dirty fuel with cleaner, greener


energy like wind, wave and solar. For single dad Robin, it's made life


harder. Like many families on low incomes, finances are balanced on a


knife edge and price hikes or cold snaps hit him hard. As Orton has


turned I have been loath to put the heating on `` as Orton has turned ``


autumn. And I said to my children, shut the door, keep the heat in. The


fact that energy prices are going up, that will make it hard. I have a


token meters so I have to buy it as I go, I am trying to buy more than I


need so that come winter time an the cold months, I have something there.


Are you OK? Come on, sweetheart. Last winter it was appalling.


His is a familiar story but what may surprise you is where the power he


uses is actually coming from. Even on this Monday night in October,


about 40% of our electricity is still coming from burning coal.


I've come to Kellingley colliery on the edge of the old Selby coal


field. 900 tonnes of coal hurtles upwards every hour, supplying nearby


Drax power station and there's plenty more where that's come from.


Our coal industry has been allowed to decline because greener energy


was supposed to take over, but it's not there yet. In fact, over the


last seven days on average it accounted for less than 5% of the


UK's electricity and the chief executive of UK Coal fears there are


no easy answers. Decisions in this country are getting close to the


edge, frighteningly so. About 80% of all ownership of all energy


decisions in the UK are in some form of foreign ownership and frankly the


energy policy that we do not have in the UK, that means that the decision


is all too often are being taken away from the UK and there is a lack


of investment and that is worrying, we should be worried about that.


That uncertainty has seen two deep mines close this year alone


including one owned by UK Coal. It's a far cry from the industry's heyday


and there's no getting away from the fact that coal mining in the UK is


on a precipice but here they say a commitment to coal's value, even in


the short term, could allow for pits to reopen. For some other them that


have closed, they have got to the end of their economic life but we


have within UK Coal, Highworth colliery is capable of opening and


we are not saying to reopen them all but we should not let it pass away


quietly. But the brutal truth is it's cheaper


to ship it in than harvest what's still plentiful beneath our feet,


even if that means adding a carbon footprint to carbon itself. Today


around 70% of the coal we use for our energy needs is imported. The


vessels docked here at Immingham today have come from as far afield


as Russia and Colombia. And why invest when many of the power


stations here that burn the stuff are coming to the end of their


lives? In fact the National Grid says today there is 20% less power


available from coal`fired power stations than last winter. That's


why there's the increased talk of blackouts and it's a situation some


saw coming years ago. This government and previous governments


have all been told that we would run into this sort of situation by 2014,


2015 as various power stations, old ones which are 40 years old, close


down for various reasons and they are not being replaced and the


governments have sat on their hands and not done anything about it and


now, surprise, surprise, they are worried about it all.


Elsewhere in Europe ` in Germany and the Netherlands ` they've built new


coal fired`power stations to bridge the gap while green energy plays


catch up. Professor Fell's preference would have been nuclear


but whatever fuel, power is needed now and he fears there is only one


answer to the immediate crisis. Frankly, I think we will have to


keep the coal`fired power stations going and in theory, if we do that


and we break European rules we could be heavily fined for doing it.


And of course those fines, those low carbon targets have been set for a


reason ` to encourage us to embrace green technology. The importance of


renewables like this wind farm in North Yorkshire was highlighted by


recent scientific evidence that man's reliance on fuels like coal


have impacted on our climate. And moreover green energy, once it's up


and running, is powered for free. If we have the right investment in the


renewables we can keep the lights on with them. Some fossil fuels but


mostly gas will enable us to have an affordable, secure and low carbon


energy system. But in Germany and the Netherlands, they are building


more coal`fired stations, are we missing a trick? The way you do not


get cheap energy is by continuing depending on fossil fuels. The cost


will go up, 50% on the cost of gas in real terms over the next ten


years and that is what is really driving energy bills up at the


moment. Investment in renewables will bring more stability to the


energy market and provide cheaper affordable bills for energy


consumers. What is clear is that there are no easy answers. But here


at Drax, they are positive about the future. Not only have they switched


one of their coal units over to burn biomass, they're also working with


the Government and the National Grid to deliver a greener way to burn


coal. If it gets the go`ahead, it will build a brand new coal`fired


plant like this where carbon emissions would be captured and fed


through a pipeline. The CO2 would zip through Yorkshire and out into


the North Sea where it would be stored under the sea bed. We are


very positive about the project and the Government are as well and


nothing the Government can see the sense in using carbon capture and


storage technology and particularly because it helps transition to a


fully low carbon future so we can get the technology right and then it


is cost`effective, renewable energy. Nobody from the Government were able


to give us an interview that they provided a statement saying that the


lights are not going out and that it intended to reopen mothballed gas


power stations which would mitigate the risks in the middle of the


decade. That may solve the issue of supply and gas does burn cleaner


than coal but it does not address the real issue for consumers like


Robin, that of price. The continued rise in the cost of whole sale gas


is one reason why suppliers say they are having to put up prices right


now. I have to buy in of electricity to last me a week and then food and


then other things. Is the amount of money you have got left getting


smaller? Yes, definitely. My daughter is starting to notice that


the fridge is not as full as it used to be. They will eat and get what


they need. The question comes to me. I may not have a hot meal. For


Robin, like many people, cost is everything.


If you have got a view on that story all know what a story we should be


covering, you can contact us on Twitter or e`mail. Coming up `


winning the war, why Churchill wanted JB Priestley taken off the


airwaves in World War II. It is the biggest challenge to our


farming industry, bovine TB is spreading fast across central


England are now threatening the borders of Yorkshire and


Lincolnshire. This month, measures were put in place to try to stop


this happening but Inside Out has discovered alarming evidence of Miss


testing and poor enforcement. We have been investigating.


From a few isolated cases in the 1980s, bovine tuberculosis now


affects large areas of England. And it's been steadily moving north and


east. The number of herds affected by the disease in North Yorkshire


more than doubled in the year to this June. In Lincolnshire, it


trebled. How to tackle the disease is controversial. But what is agreed


is it must be stamped out in an area known as the Edge. An area between


high`risk counties where there's an epidemic and low`risk counties where


cases are rare, an area where the disease is steadily spreading. I'm


standing in Cheshire on the Edge which also includes counties like


Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire. If the disease can't be controlled


here, it could reach Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Lincolnshire


and Yorkshire by 2022. DEFRA is so concerned about the Edge, it


introduced measure like tougher cattle tests here this month. But is


that enough? Phil Latham farms on the Edge and in a high risk TB area


in Cheshire. Until a year and a half ago, he'd never had a case of bovine


TB. This year 89 cows were slaughtered. Emotionally and


financially, pretty tough. We are clear now but we have not adapted


the business. We have decided to go down to 300 cows, making people


redundant. A chap is leaving today, actually. Phil hasn't bought in a


cow in 16 years. He's certain badgers infected his cattle and


welcomes the cull, but believes farmers are also at risk because of


problems with the AHVLA, the body which manages cattle testing. It


took 174 days between our farm getting TB and our neighbours being


tested. A ridiculous timescale. Their paper systems seem to be out


of control. We were told to get our cattle tested after they had been


shot. I have one neighbour who wasn't tested for 20 years because


the AHVLA forgot to allocate him the test and in order to do his test, it


took 40 visits. It's a ridiculous waste of resources and way to


control a disease. When bovine TB was discovered in Phil's herd, his


farm was closed down. No cattle could be moved on or off it.


Restrictions crucial to stop the disease spreading. But some farmers


are breaking them. Anthony Kirkham is a cattle dealer who farms a few


miles away. He's been prosecuted twice for moving cattle illegally,


while his farm was shut down with TB. Nearly 200 offences. We asked Mr


Kirkham why he repeatedly broke the law, but he hasn't replied. Despite


those convictions he has a licence to transport cattle around the


country. Issued by the AHVLA again, the same body that put TB


restrictions on his farm. But it doesn't refuse a licence for


breaking TB rules. Its interest is in making sure transported animals


are well treated. What's happening in Cheshire and the Edge is alarming


farmers further afield. It's about 40 miles. It's creeping closer all


of the time. Mark Goodall has 200 cows in the Tong Village in


Bradford, a low`risk area. His herd's free of the disease but he


fears that could soon change. It's a major concern. It is getting so


close. We have had isolated incidentplu`mac about five miles


away. It is getting closer and closer. Most farmers, like Mark,


farm within the rules and do all they can to prevent TB spreading.


But are the rules strict enough? They are trying to make the cattle


worth more money. They are moving them from a dirty area to a clean


area. I have come to meet a farmer who claims the law is being broken


for profit. We have protected his identity. You often see wagons from


down south pull up late at night. The next morning, they are loaded up


by a different wagon and taken to auctions. On paper it never


happened. How do you feel about that? It is disgusting. We are TB


free. It is hard to sort it out. They are trying but they need to be


more ruthless to stop it. Every week tens of thousands of animals are


bought and sold at auctions. I've come to a new auction in Cumbria,


used by farmers across the north. On the screens here, limited


information about the animal you're buying. Auctions don't have room and


aren't forced to provide more. So, how confident can a farmer be in


what they're buying? There is not enough information. You could buy an


animal which you think is of a Cumbrian farm, but it could be from


a high`risk or anywhere. The government wants to introduce a new


system. But it is only voluntary not under a tree. What do you think of


that? We have played around with this disease for too long. We have


got to do some thing about it. That is not the only bit of legislation


Trevor wants to see changed. In low`risk areas, the neighbours of a


farmer who comes down with TB have a 28`day window before they have to


shut down their own farms. For the 28 days, they can move and Selby


livestock. All of the rules have to be tightened up. So will that


happen? The Government is reviewing how to tackle TB to stop it moving


north. But it doesn't believe farmers should be made to provide a


TB history for their animals at places like auctions. We do not


believe it should because we need to get all of the information and let


people think about what they are doing. It applies to other endemic


diseases as well. And the 28`day window that Trevor wants to see


removed? A low`risk area has very low risk of TB so the risk is


minimal. And that farmers who do not record cattle correctly risk losing


a subsidy. Back in Cheshire, Phil Latham hopes


enough will be done to halt the spread of TB but he says he is yet


to be convinced. The inexorable spread of TB across the country


through all the couple areas will continue unless a better policy and


properly resourced policy is implemented. There is an awful lot


of work to do, otherwise we will have a situation in the country


where a lot of the badgers throughout the country and a lot of


the cattle and further north than here will have TB and that is an


appalling vision of the future. The Bradford born writer and


broadcaster JB Priestley is buried near here. He started broadcasting


during World War II on Sunday nights in an attempt to raise spirits but


there came a point when his message did not suit the powers that be and


that was bound to lead to a clash with the man at the top.


They are synonymous with winning the Second World War, the speeches of


Winston Churchill. The British Empire and its Commonwealth will


last through a thousand years, men will still say, this was their


finest hour. But there was another voice, now almost forgotten which


rallied the spirit of the country. After the evacuation from Dunkirk,


the author and broadcaster JB Priestley was hired by the BBC to


write and present the postscript programme broadcast every Sunday


night. When they learn how we began this war by snatching glory out of


defeat and then swept on to victory, they may also learn how the


little holiday steamers made an excursion to hell and came back


glorious. If Churchill was the voice of the nation, JB Priestley was the


voice of the people. He was from Bradford and by the start of the


Second World War, he was rightly regarded as the nation's favourite


author. `` widely regarded. Who better to rally the national spirit?


In the autumn of 1933 he did a tour of England and Wales will stop he


had quite a strong point of view about the way in which the


controlling forces in society had allowed big cities to become pretty


rough places to live. I think he was seeing as being of the left. We


could fight and fight these Nazis until we broke their black hearts.


At first it seemed that Churchill and Priestley were doing the same


thing ` using the power of language to stir hearts and unite the British


people but after a while it became clear that the two men wanted very


different kinds of written after the war. And that was bound to lead to a


clash. The two men were on a collision course according to the


avid historian, Doctor Richard North. He says that over 20


programmes in 1940 and a further six in 1941, Priestley grew increasingly


critical of Churchill's government until he was fired. The BBC and the


information minister at the time blamed each other for the decision.


But Doctor North believes Churchill himself approved. The question is,


who fired him? Whether it was Mr Cooper or Churchill had his


fingerprints on it. I think they thought he was rather leftish and he


was quoted as saying that public opinion was a very fine instrument


and he proposed to use it. It's pretty much fixed in the


British psyche, the story that after the little ships brought the army


home from Dunkirk, the country stood on the brink of invasion. German


forces were massed on the other side of the Channel and the only thing


that stopped them was Fighter Command winning mastery of the air.


Dr North claims that Churchill's glorification of the few, in other


words, Fighter Command in the Battle of Britain, excluded the massive


contribution of the many to the war effort. He says it was this kind of


language that led to a political standoff between Priestley and


Churchill. The idea of an elite few rescuing the people was very much


more in accordance with Churchill's political vision than it was of the


Labour view which had turned the people's war into a campaign issue.


But Dr North's view isn't shared by many other historians But on the


question of Priestley, what do now ancient documents tell us? Do you


think there is a danger that the book is actually going to do a


disservice to Churchill and the men in fighter command? I believe he


is. Definitely. I think in a way he is doing a disservice to the people


who forgotten because they are not forgotten. On the question of


Priestly, what do ancient documents tell us? I am at Bradford University


to find out. Let us take a look at the evidence. This is an article


from the Sunday cat litter express. You begin to suspect we are not in


the same war. You find yourself day off today being obstructed instead


of being encouraged. What about this one? This is 1941. A year later.


This is a letter from Priestly to his American publisher. Apparently I


offended too many influential reactionaries. What about this one?


This is a sort of autobiography which came out 20 years later. He'd


been mulling over the sink for 20 years. What he says about the


postscript is a little paragraph about why they stop. I received two


letters, I kept them for years. One was from the Ministry of information


telling me that the BBC was responsible for the decision to take


me off the air and the other was from the BBC saying that a directive


had come from the Ministry of information. Blaming each other, I


think both of them were concealing the essential fact that the order to


shut me up had come from elsewhere. That elsewhere should be in capital


letters. Who do you think he is referring to? My feeling is that he


is implying that Churchill is somewhere at the heart of this. And


that's where the trail might have ended but for information we


uncovered in Cambridge. The city is home to the Churchill College and


Archives. It's here that Inside Out has discovered that, far from


standing aloof, Churchill took a keen if not obsessive interest in


Priestley's broadcasts and was eager for his removal. Some of the


documents in here are astonishing. Look at this one. This is from


Churchill himself to the information minister. He says, "I'm very sorry


that you've got Mr Priestley back and that his first broadcast should


have been an argument utterly contrary to my own views. How many


more has he got to do? Have you any control over what he says? He's far


from friendly to the government and I should not be too sure about him


on larger issues." And then we have this written the same day from Duff


Cooper, straight back to Churchill, obviously written with some urgency.


Then we have this written the same day from the information minister


straight back to Churchill. It says, "He is due to give five more talks.


I will see the scripts and will suppress anything I think should not


be said, but subject to your instructions, I would not propose to


delete all criticism of His Majesty's government. It would be a


pity if it were thought that the increased control which we're now


assuming over the BBC was designed to suppress the free expression of


opinion." This correspondence is extraordinarily revealing. While


it's not a direct order to sack Priestley, Churchill's intentions


are crystal clear. Within weeks, Priestley was history. Even so,


Nicholas Hawkes is still not convinced Churchill sacked his


stepfather, as Priestley himself suspected. I presume to know better


than him because I have been through all the records in the BBC archive.


I think that looking back on it he recognised that his contribution to


Britain's morale and steadying of nerves had been very great and he


could not understand why the BBC wanted to terminate. Arguably both


Priestley and Churchill were vindicated by subsequent events and


the writings of both men are now part of our national heritage. What


remains is the mystery of what happened in those dark days of 1940


and '41 and whether we shall even know the true history of that time.


That is all for tonight from here in the Dales, make sure you join us


next week. We will be finding out about the possibility of a new mini


ice age. We will be following the officers trying to stop illegal


cigarettes entering the country and hearing from an explorer who thinks


children should get out more.


Toby Foster presents stories that matter in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. This week Abbie Jones investigates whether lax enforcement and testing is leading to the spread of bovine TB in the north of England, Danni Hewson asks whether energy shortages could lead us full circle back to coal and Lucy Hester looks into the wartime intrigue behind the sacking of writer and broadcaster JB Priestley from the BBC.

Download Subtitles