19/06/2017 Newsnight


In-depth investigation and analysis of the stories behind the day's headlines with Evan Davis. How does the state treat terror attacks against Muslims?

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 19/06/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!



It's been a grim spring and it's seen yet another terror


We'll ask what we know of Islamophobic terror


Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.


We've lost three months since invoking Article 50,


but today, the Brexit bargaining actually began.


Labour's Keir Starmer tells us whether they're offering


the hard Brexit or the soft one, with free movement of people.


And will there be a free movement of prime ministers?


And I've learned more detail today of the turmoil inside Number 10.


As terror strikes again, we see how it is dealt with,


behind the scenes in a hospital coping with the aftermath of the


Yet another attack, so similar to some we have seen.


This one again used a vehicle as a weapon.


But this time, the victims were not random - they were selected


The police, the Prime Minister, the Mayor of London,


all have gone out of their way to make clear they draw no


distinction between the atrocities of Islamism madmen


It was not just a hate crime, it was also terrorism.


It came just after midnight last night, in the mixed area


of Finsbury Park in London, near the mosque there,


at a time when the Ramadan fast was over and several people


were helping an elderly man who was taken ill on the pavement.


John Sweeney has spent much of the day at the scene


John, we can see quite a lot going on behind you there. What would you


say the feeling is there tonight? Well, the feeling isn't much calmer,


to be frank, than it was earlier today, when it felt very, very


feverish. This community is one of the most mixed communities, all


sorts, all religions, all kinds of people here. They are doing an


extraordinary effort - Muslims, Anglicans, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs to


get together and refind the glue. The other thing that's happening is


we're finding more of the attacker. His family are saying, listen, he


was a troubled man, but we no idea that he was racist. They've offered


a big apology to the people who suffered in this attack. Let's


remember, this was an attack on people practising their religion. It


was solely targeted at Muslims and as well as the pressure from the


good people to say we're all one, the forces of extremism almost


seeking, you can almost feel it, trying to rip people apart. So, it


feels as though, you've got two sets of extremists feeding off each other


- the far right and the Islamist groups - trying to tear society


asunder. The loser, it feels tonight, is common humanity.


Every terror attack is different, but the weapon of choice for all


attacks in London in the past four months has been a vehicle. Last


night, the targets were Muslims, who had just finished praying at


Finsbury Park Mosque. An elderly man had collapsed with a suspected heart


attack. People were tending the sick man when they were hit by a van. The


man died. It's not clear whether as a result of the van attack. 11


people were injured. This footage, shot on mobile phones, shows the


attacker being taken away by the police. He was named tonight as


Darren Osborne from Cardiff, 47 years old. One of his neighbours


told Newsnight that Osborne was an aggressive bully, feared by people


who lived near him. As far as we can tell, he had no far right digital


footprint. No known connection with far right groups and no trace that


would have alerted security forces. He seems to have been, in other


words, a clean skin. Today at Finsbury Park, the atmosphere jumped


around, sometimes sober, sometimes feverish. But one sign of hope - it


was the mosque's Imam who saved the man's life. We surrounded him and


protected him from any form. We stops all forms after tack and abuse


towards him, that was coming from every angle. Four terror attacks on


the run have exhausted everyone, Prime Minister included. The


terrible terrorist attack that took place last night was around evil act


borne out of hatred, it has devastated a community. I'm pleased


to have been here today to see the strength of that community coming


together all faiths united in one desire to see extremism and hatred


of all sorts driven out of our society. There is no place for this


hatred in our country today. We need to work together as wurn society, as


one community to drive it out this evil that is affecting so many


families. So the Prime Minister has come to


the mosque. She's list rned to people. Up get some indication of


the anxiety of the Government. They want to keep this community on-side


and clearly, the Prime Minister's visit here today means the


Government is worried. Anger at the Government. Anger too at the media.


A lot of people now, with the recent attacks in London, London Bridge,


Manchester attacks, any person with no intellect would read this think,


oh, Muslims, they're this, they're that. We have to fight back. We have


to do this. But realistically speaking, this is the title the


media has given it. Like I mentioned to you, murder is not from our


religion. Any person who just reads this will think automatically


related to Muslims, they will do things which they believe is


revenge, but realistically it's a radical action where they have no


clue what it's about whatsoever. Yeah, I do believe the media does


play a big part. The official crime statistics haven't come in yet, but


figures suggest after the Manchester terror atrocity hate crimes against


Muslims spiked five fold. The highest ranking police officer in


the country resigned last Tuesday. I was on duty and led the response for


the murder of Lee Rigby. At that time we had mosque attacks, three of


which were burned down. Very conscious of not having a replay


when hate crime went up. It was very much in our strategy to be able to


compound against that. In Westminster we did that. In


Manchester it didn't quite work. By London Bridge, I think, it


overwhelmed us. It's not that we haven't had a focus or we haven't


had plans, we have. When you have three on the trot, it's something


different. The goal of these terror attacks starting with the killing of


Jo Cox last year and the three atrocities claimed by Islamic State


in the last four months, and now this one, is to sow division between


communities. The danger is - it's beginning to feel as if they're


succeeding. Well, think about what far-right


or Islamaphobic terror and Islamist On both sides, there is an adherence


to the view that Muslims and the rest of us are not only


in completely different tribes and that we are at


war with each other. There is also the possibility that


attackers of both creeds may have certain mental health conditions -


as some have put it, losers who put meaning


into their lives via hate. But despite the similarities,


we have tended to be more preoccupied with Islamist terror,


as the preponderance of recent attacks have come


from that direction. I'm joined by journalist


Nesrine Malik, William Baldet, who works on the Prevent programme


for the Home Office, and Darren Carroll, who was an early


member of the far-right English Defence League,


and now campaigns against racism Very good evening to you all. Does


it feel different to you, this is, it's very unusual. This is targeted


at one group. It's not a random attack which would take Muslims and


Christians and anybody else, targeted at a group. It does feel


different for a couple of reasons. One is that it's clearly targeted


towards Muslims. It's outside a mosque. It's during Ramadan. It's


unequivocally a hate crime against Muslims. Number two, I think because


it's come on the back of a rising wave of anti-Muslim attacks after


Manchester and London Bridge etc, it seems like it's the culmination of


an accelerating trend. Do you think the Islamic community is surprised,


scared? I mean - I think, this has been, this is particularly strike,


Islamophobic attacks have been part and parcel of the life of the Muslim


community for a long time now, whether it's abuse against women who


wear hijab. Whether it's incidents where people walking back from


mosques are attacked. Give us an example of the sorts of things? I'm


Notts advisably Muslim, I don't wear a hijab. When I move around Outside


a mosque it's not as obvious with someone with a face cover or a man


in a sort of cloak and beard. It's about people who are obviously


advisably Muslim. Visibly Muslim. Darren, give us some insight into


the mind set. You were an early member of EDL. What was going on in


your life that attracted you to a message of hate? Well, at the time,


in 2009, basically, I bought into the narrative of them and us.


Personally, I felt looking back respectively, disenfranchised. I


didn't - I didn't realise it then, but looking back, from the path I'm


on now, I was. I wasn't happy with local governance and there was -


There were, it had a big Muslim population and they had one or two


more extreme elements there, is that right? It was quite divided and


tribal? We were living our lives and the way we were living in Luton


wasn't being portrayed correctly I felt via the media or local


newspapers. Disenfranchised and kicked in basically. Vauxhall had


shut a few years before that. You don't use the word "radicalised" of


yourself. Due meet people -- did you meet people who were so hate filled


they would commit violence? Yeah, I was on demonstrations where people


were actually you know really angry and not getting their words out


they're that angry. They're trying to say two or three words in one go


they're that angry. Where that anger comes from, I can only say that


they, they've bought into something. Whether that comes from seeing on TV


there, that the media probably played it up a bit. However, there


was genuine concerns also. You know, jobs, apprenticeships, housing. Life


was a bit unfulfilled and so all this stuff - Yeah. In terms of how


many far right people, does Prevent cover far right or is it just about


Islamists? Prevent has covered far right formally since 2011. As a


practitioner working in it since 2008, we've tackled it from the


early days. I've gone on record of talking about a young lad I worked


with who was ten years old immersed in neo-Nazi ideology by a family


member that. Came as a shock. In the early days of prevent it was around


the Al-Qaeda narrative. I was hearing communities come back at me


and say actually there's other forms of extremism. An interesting thing


is the case of some of these people who Darren was talking to or have


beening conversationsing -- having conversations with, what narrative


can you draw between them and the Islamist fan attics. If you take


away the ideology of a young Islamist and the far right


extremist, the individual below is very similar, the same psychological


fwrackures, the same social -- fractures, the same social


situations. They have gone for answers with the organisations. They


present the world in binary terms, devicive. These are what the


extremists are trying to do of both persuasions. We don't know whether


Darren Osborne was involved in groups or had friends encouraging


him. We know he was 47. That is... I mean that's not the kind of young


hot head that you think of. In fact, Khalid Masood was 52. Is something


happening here on age? Possibly. We are keen to tackle the


entire age bracket. There was a lot done in colleges, trying to break


down social stereotypes, particularly around Islam and


Muslims. A lot of young people get their information from social media


and the mainstream media, which can be culpable with painting negative


stereotypes. We also work with people that are a lot older. We did


some outreach around the far right specifically, in Prevent. We found a


lot of younger people were quite well integrated and supported the


Muslim community centres, but their parents still harboured deeply


racist and anxious sentiments towards Muslims. Let's talk a little


bit about the media coverage. There was some anger today that we have


drawn the comparison between these two EU types, but people say you


just dismiss one lot as mental health problems and the other lot


are organised terrorism? It's a very common response. There are two


things, whenever there is an attack by a Muslim, the media portrays it


as a coordinated, coherent culpability on behalf of all


Muslims. That's not fair, nobody says it is all Muslims, everybody is


careful to make sure... I'm not saying everybody does that, I am


saying there is a perception that happens. Certain words are used,


certain languages used. People asked questions like, what is the Muslim


community's response? People get the impression that there is a


generalised culpability. That impression is also reinforced when


the attacker is not Muslim, the language is around the fact that he


is a misfit, he is vulnerable. We hope that around the Jo Cox murder


-- we heard some of that around the Jo Cox murder, the tabloid saying


that he had fears about losing his council house. Trying to explain it?


Which is fine... But do it for both sides. It is an issue of individual


disenfranchise. But it can't be for one and not the other. How did you


get out of it? Gradually is the answer. You end up not liking


yourself and where you are. You have to fall back on... You go back to


basics. That's what I did. I thought, who am I? I don't like


myself. That's what I did, I fell back on my upbringing. I lost my


parents when I was 13. I fell back on my mother's voice telling me,


you're not this person. That was the beginning for me. I couldn't stomach


it any more, I really couldn't stomach it. Gradually, is the


answer. Thank you all very much. We are four days short


of the first anniversary A lot has happened in that time -


except any Brexit negotiations. We invoked Article 50


at the end of March, so we know exactly when the talks


end and when we are We can give our countdown clock


a quick appearance - 648 days to go. It's very Sky News, this kind


of thing, but it does make the point that a lot of work has to be done


in relatively short time. Today's talks started


on some specifics of That is in itself interesting,


because there was a time when the Brits had wanted talks


on trade to be With no sign of that today,


we can take it as a small Did they actually negotiate a day,


or was this really just a formality, a formal start? I think they did. I


think, really, what we have learned is a turn-off the notch, as it were,


on the positioning and sequencing of this bigger negotiation. We have


learned a bit more. We know the EU was prioritising the future status


of citizens in the UK. That is number one. Number two is the budget


question. Only after substantial process has been agreed, and we have


confirmed that progress will be a judgment by the member governments,


through Donald Tusk, the President of the council. They will make a


judgment as to whether these broader issues can then be discussed, or


discussion can begin on those. Then there is the question of the Irish


border. What will the arrangements be? We thought that was on an equal


level with the money, the status of the citizens. But it definitely


seems to be somewhat behind, probably because it's going to take


longer and they think it is more reasonable to ask for progress on


the first two before the broader relationship, the possible shape of


a trade deal in its very broadest sense, begins to come under


discussion. What we have seen, because we have seen different


drafts of these EU negotiating guidelines in recent months, is the


EU position being carried forward very hard to make the same


comparison for the UK position, because it has been kept under


wraps, largely. We get the sense that the UK is going to try to take


the initiative on citizens in one another's countries issue, the key


one come on Thursday, when Theresa May comes to Brussels. That they


will put forward their position, but all the time everyone here is aware


of the tenuous state now of Theresa May's government following the


election. All of this could come open to question or be sniped at


politically back home because of the state of the UK Government.


There are diplomatic arguments for secrecy, but here they have been


trumped by politics. Today's EU watchword is transparency. That


means, amongst other things, being clear about your negotiating


priority and how they have been affected by the recent UK election.


A fair deal is possible, and far better than no deal. That is what I


said to David today. That is why we will work all the time, with the UK,


and never against the UK. Here in the institutions of EU power, the


loss of Theresa May's majority has awakened fears that a complete


failure to reach agreement is looking more likely, with everything


that might involve. Sophie is a senior Brexit negotiator for the


European Parliament. I know that some people claim that no deal is


better than a bad deal, and that sounds really tough. But if you


think of the consequences, what no deal would mean, legally speaking it


would be best for clear. From midnight, the 29th of March, 2019,


Britain is no longer a member. From one moment to the next, there will


be chaos. No deal means chaos. Brussels is notoriously leaky. That


is another reason to emphasise transparency. The European


Parliament, as well as 27 government is being updated regularly, means


nothing will stay secret for long. Some here see risks in that, also.


It can also backfire, in the sense that it can lead to a lot of


posturing from many sides. That posturing may sour the atmosphere in


a way that makes a deal more difficult. Theresa May, she has been


dramatically weakened by the election. But I would advise to the


27 not to try to take too much advantage of that. Again, that may


backfire. A diplomatic mountain must now be scaled. The two chief


negotiators are meeting for the first formal talks today to settle


the order in which shoes will be tackled, exchanged suitably Alpine


gifts. Today, it is clear that the sequencing is very much the way the


EU wanted it, which inevitably puts questions to David Davis. It's not


how it starts, it is how it finishes. The UK has been crystal


clear about our approach to negotiations. The withdrawal process


cannot be concluded without the future relationship also been taken


into account. Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. The


negotiators shared a convivial lunch and their personal rapport seems


real enough. But diplomats must fear that today marks the beginning of


their minister being judged by a press and Parliament keen to find,


in each course of negotiations, the bitter taste of a promise broken or


a commitment rashly made. Those chief negotiators emphasise their


commitment today to maximum transparency. The difference, you


might argue, is that Michel Barnier actually means it. Talk to people in


the commission and you will hear those who argue that the more


Britain learns about the daily detail of these negotiations, the


harder it will be for Theresa May to keep her querulous party together


and behind the Brexit plan. Does transparency make it harder for a


British Government to manage the message on Brexit? Well, you know,


that is one way of looking at it. The UK and EU are not adversaries.


We are not negotiating against each other. There has to be a win-win


outcome. There cannot be different messages. I do think that


transparency is going to help create the trust that we need, both in the


UK and in the other EU countries for people to support the process. For


months, EU leaders have been asking London to say what it wants from


Brexit. That is now well under way. But many here now wonder whether the


UK Government can stick to its platform.


We did want to speak to a Government minister on the approach


to Brexit negotiations, but none was available.


But then some of them have only been in a job for a week.


However, with a hung Parliament, Labour's position could be quite


important in the next two years if it's clear.


Earlier, I spoke to the shadow Brexit secretary, Sir Keir Starmer.


I began by asking him whether it was a negotiation or a dictation.


Well, it's a negotiation, but we got off to the worst possible starts,


because the Prime Minister called an election that she


It's not clear what her mandate is and she's lost authority abroad.


Now, all of us want these talks to succeed because we need


a good deal for Britain that is going to last


We've got off to the worst possible start, I'm afraid.


Customs union, you've been a little equivocal on the customs union.


But I think if I reduce your position to the clearest,


and what would make sense from your point of view,


you would start out by saying yes, let's go into the customs union


if they'll have us, even if that means we can't


make free trade deals with other countries independently?


But it is important to focus on outcomes and not the model.


That's really important, because we're starting negotiations


and the question that's before everybody is what is it


The vehicle, or the model, is secondary to that.


We've been clear that it's tariff-free access


to the single market, it's no new customs impediments


and it's something that works for services.


But, interestingly, that is a thing that everybody agrees on.


The EU will then have its priorities.


I think its priorities are likely to be how do we guarantee or ensure


that the UK wouldn't be able to undercut regulations


Because that would, to them, be a threat.


So that goes on the table and we have to negotiate.


I can't understand why you can't make your mind on the customs union.


It's a very simple one, you stay in the customs union,


probably, but you give up your right to free trade deals.


You're in favour of that or you're not, it's quite binary.


As far as the customs union is concerned, the question


whether it's better to be in or out can only be determined


further down the line, because you need to know first


what's the deal you've done on the single market.


Does it, the end of the exercise, make more sense to


There are advantages of being out, there are advantages,


significant advantages, of being in.


So, that's why we say leave it on the table.


There are advantages, it solves a lot of real difficulties.


Of course it means you can't strike free trade agreements.


But, and it's important to see this through,


But if you stay in, you could take the benefit of those trade deals


that the EU is striking, and which we could strike with them.


But there's an element of fudge in the Labour position.


It's probably designed to hold together a broad coalition of many


blue-collar workers who voted Brexit, many metropolitan


liberals who voted remain, and you're trying to effectively be


We should be in the customs union, because that's going to help car


producers, it's going to mean no border in Northern Ireland


Well why don't you just make the case and say,


why don't we just go in and make that the objective?


Because until you're further into negotiations,


it's not entirely clear whether it's the right option


I think we should have it on the table and there are real


But to suggest this is just a political fudge is wrong.


Let's talk about the migration issue, because there is one option


that would probably cut through a lot of negotiation.


I think everybody agrees that complete free movement


You're not in favour of that, nor are the Conservatives.


But there's a kind of watered-down version of free movement,


If you have a job, you can come here.


But you can't just come here and live here without any work to do.


Because they may be quite attracted to that, the EU.


We'd have to work out what that looked like.


But with freedom of movement, immigration,


Obviously refugees we have obligations to, students should


That leaves you families and people that want to come to work.


I think that we could strike a model that deals with people


Because, whatever the outcome, it's got to work for the economy


We don't want arbitrary caps on migration that


You see, I think you've got a quite clear position.


But you sure as hell don't make it sound clear.


Thank you for giving me this opportunity.


You should go in and say free movement of labour,


in the customs union, we won't strike deals


It will save us a lot of time in this negotiation, it


solves Northern Ireland, we'll recognise the citizens.


Incidentally, you'd accept ECJ, the European Court having


jurisdiction over various issues as well, so that cuts


Just to be clear on that, we said that there has to be some


dispute resolution mechanism, a court-like body.


That's a big hole in Theresa May's plans.


I think there is discussion to be had about what that looks


like and what the role of British judges are on it.


Desperate to get the clarity there, even if it means my summarising what


he's saying. Day one of the negotiation is done.


Let's take stock with our political editor, Nick Watt.


Everybody is asking - is Theresa May's weakened position going to


affect this, is she even going to make the running for the 18 months


of negotiation. What's the thinking? The numbers in Parliament have moved


in a mildly soft Brexit direction. The Prime Minister is weakened after


that general election result. I have to say, I do not detect a love for


Theresa May in the Tory Party. Cabinet ministers are saying they


think she's had a loss of nerve over the election setback and also over


her response to the tower fire. One Cabinet minister, who's a Loyalist


said to me, "She can stay, if she wants to." I sense that some


grandees are warming up to say to Theresa May, have your Queen's


Speech on Wednesday, get the vote through next week, then maybe you


should think about going, because if you don't, you will face a veil of


tears although it is important to say that the leading Brexiteers are


determined to save her. Interestingly, the Prime Minister is


responding to these concerns, I'm told, that intriguingly, she's been


distancing herself from her controversial former joint chiefs of


staff who were criticised for being uncollegiate. I'm told that she's


been saying to ministers that she didn't know the extent of their


activities that alienated so many people. As for how long she wants to


stay, I'm told she believes it's her duty to stay and her definitive view


is - she wants to stay for the entirety of the Article 50 talks


which means at least, as you were saying earlier, until the end of


March 2019. Thank. The death toll from the Grenfell


Tower fire rose again today. A total of 79 people are now either


dead or missing, presumed The victims of the fire


were remembered this morning The job of investigating


what the exact cause was goes on but, six days on from the fire,


the Department for Communities and Local Government has written


to local council and housing association chief executives


in England requiring them to look Our investigations man Phil Kemp has


been researching the tower fire and the issue of cladding for us,


and is here now. Phil, just tell us about this letter


and the debate over cladding? The investigations are continuing as to


the precise cause. It seems to the Department for Communities and Local


Government isn't taking any chances. I've got a copy of an e-mail that


the most senior civil serve abt at DCLG sent to the chief executives of


all local authorities and Housing Associations in England with


instructions to check the cladding on any high-rise social housing that


they're responsible for. Specifically, what they're being


asked to look for is the type of cladding that we revealed last week


was used on the Grenfell Tower refurbishment. Now what this letter


says is that if any local authorities or Housing Associations


identify that type of cladding, even if they're not sure exactly what


it's made of or what's in it, they have to send it away for testing at


the Government's expense. It doesn't go on to say what happens next, but


you can imagine that if the wrong sort of cladding is identified, that


it's going to have to come down. Wow. I mean one of the big issues


and it's been amazing it hasn't been resolved is this cladding compliant


with the regulations? Philip Hammond said he didn't think it was allowed.


What is the truth? It's a matter of sow man ticks. It's not banned for


taller buildings. There are strict rules around its use. If you want to


use flammable type of cladding on a high-rise building in England, you


would need to show it had passed a special bespoke test involving the


entire wall system and an expert that we spoke to said that this type


of cladding was unlikely to pass that test. For all practical


purposes, this type of cladding is banned for tall buildings in


England. That's what this letter is about, to decide how widespread the


use of this material S A lot has happened recently


to suggest we are living Brexit and politics are one thing,


repeated terror attacks So on a day that has


seen a deliberate attack on Muslims outside a mosque,


we thought you might be interested - even uplifted - to see what goes


on behind the scenes in the event The television production company


Label One make the BBC two documentary series Hospital,


and they were filming in St Mary's Hospital in London


on the day of the Westminster Bridge Their cameras were there,


as those dreadful events unfolded. The full documentary


is on BBC Two tomorrow, but we have a few minutes of it now,


showing how that one hospital Good afternoon, ladies


and gentleman, we're here to review It would be nice to see some


of the hard to recruits... We're on stand by for a major


incident at Westminster Bridge? They've given a standby


with 15 accepting. REPORTER: There is a major police


operation under way. St Mary's Hospital


in Paddington is one of four major trauma centres


in London capable of dealing Three miles from Westminster,


it's the nearest to the scene of a Lesley is taking silver


and Judy taking bronze. During a major incident,


the hospital follows 194-page set of protocols, standby means prepare


to receive casualties. Anybody else who was elected


for today who hasn't gone knife to skin,


they need to be sent home. We need a collation of A


receiving spaces, trauma receiving spaces and a running


collation of beds available now. It's 12 minutes since the hospital


was put on standby. Off duty medical and nursing staff


arrive to assist in A The bleep goes off, your phone goes


off and you come in. Everybody just be quiet


in resus for the moment. The first person to arrive in A


is the alleged attacker. We're going to transfer alongside


to our right side, please. The first casualty


that's arrived has died. We will set up a mortuary,


he will go there and police guard. People are jumping in


the river to escape. This is what's come


through from the antiterrorism. Paramedics have been treating


victims at the scene. The first victim to arrive


at St Mary's was a French schoolboy. Today was the last day


of a school trip to London. We're going to get a collar on,


log roll him, get him off the scoop, covered up, warm,


fast scan, set of bloods Victor's school friend


arrives in A 18-year-old Jan has lost


a dangerous amount of blood He's taken for immediate


life-saving surgery. It's 40 minutes since


Victor arrived in A His condition is now stable


and does not require On an average day,


St Mary's treats three In the last 80 minutes, six have


arrived from Westminster. Jan, the French teenager, has had


his scalp successfully repaired. I can guarantee you the minute I get


on the Tube, the reality of this will start to hit home in that


what we've got here are individuals whose lives have probably


been massively altered So as much of a shock that this


was to us, can you - you can't even begin to imagine


what it's like for these poor And you can see that documentary


in full tomorrow at 9pm on BBC Two. Good evening to you. Another


scorching hot day across the south. Temperatures got up


In-depth investigation and analysis of the stories behind the day's headlines with Evan Davis. How does the state treat terror attacks against Muslims? Plus the start of Brexit talks, Grenfell Tower, and what goes on inside a hospital when a terror attack hits.

Download Subtitles