14/06/2013 Newswatch


14/06/2013

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 14/06/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Sunday Politics invites a shock jock onto the programme and has problems

:00:20.:00:28.

shutting him up. We have an idiot on the programme today! You will not

:00:28.:00:38.
:00:38.:00:38.

stop the Republic! And if robotic cameras are taking over, are they

:00:39.:00:47.

really meant to appear in shot like this? ! Last week, Watford hosted

:00:48.:00:53.

the Bilderberg Group, a gathering of influential people from the world of

:00:53.:00:59.

politics and is missed. This is an organisation that does not court

:00:59.:01:03.

publicity or host news conferences. Media coverage is minimal and that

:01:03.:01:13.
:01:13.:01:24.

the conference was the Sunday Politics which invited on an

:01:24.:01:32.

American radio host Alex Jones. His discussion of the group with David

:01:32.:01:38.

Aronowitz provided a lively encounter. The BBC got the documents

:01:38.:01:43.

decades ago that they helped found the Europa which was the Nazi German

:01:43.:01:51.

plan to take over countries economic leave. Let him speak.I saw one of

:01:51.:01:56.

your ministers say this. I am here to testify your head was not cut

:01:56.:02:04.

off. The problem is conspiracy theories are believed. Mac I am here

:02:04.:02:12.

to warn people. You keep telling me to shut up. We have people

:02:12.:02:17.

disappearing, arrest the public safety, life in prison. You are the

:02:17.:02:20.

worst person I have ever interviewed! It is off with their

:02:20.:02:28.

heads! You are watching the BBC Sundays. We have an idiot on the

:02:28.:02:36.

programme. Do not stop! You will not stop the Republic! The interview

:02:36.:02:41.

went viral with the programmes presenter and editor pointing people

:02:41.:02:51.
:02:51.:03:02.

towards it on Twitter. Many watched presenter were to blame, Gordon

:03:02.:03:12.
:03:12.:03:51.

Andrew Neil is with me. A lot of viewers said wide to invite this man

:03:51.:03:55.

on, his reputation is known, you knew he would behave this way. He

:03:55.:04:01.

regards himself as a leading expert on the Bilderberg Group. He was

:04:01.:04:06.

therefore the meeting during she and he has many people who follow him

:04:06.:04:10.

and he says he knows what he's talking about. We wanted him to put

:04:10.:04:15.

his case. In the terms of a live programme, given he had also gone

:04:15.:04:19.

off the rails on another show, it looked like it was six minutes of

:04:19.:04:24.

great TV, people would watch it on YouTube again but there was no

:04:24.:04:32.

revelations. No one I have interviewed, he is not the only one,

:04:32.:04:36.

they have lots of conspiracy theories, they may or may not be

:04:36.:04:40.

true but they have not presented the evidence. He is regarded by many who

:04:40.:04:45.

believe it is a conspiracy to be the spokesperson. I knew it would be

:04:45.:04:49.

hard to make sure David Aronowitz who was also on the programme would

:04:50.:04:57.

get a fair hearing. I thought my job as a presenter was to make sure both

:04:57.:05:01.

sides had a fair say. That proved to be not only to difficult to succeed

:05:01.:05:07.

because he kept on shouting David down but I had not anticipated he

:05:07.:05:12.

would turn on me as well. And that took us into interesting uncharted

:05:12.:05:18.

territory. I watched it and both you and David are knowing, David starts

:05:18.:05:28.
:05:28.:05:29.

of quite calm, you join in. You say is it a conspiracy? And then you

:05:29.:05:32.

have to call him an idiot and tell him to shut up. Some complaints were

:05:33.:05:36.

specifically about the fact you use that language which looks like

:05:36.:05:43.

sneering. The interview began with legitimate questions, could you

:05:43.:05:47.

explain why it is a conspiracy and what has it done question mark we

:05:47.:05:51.

continued in that vein but got nowhere. He went off a rant which

:05:51.:05:56.

had nothing to do with the Bilderberg Group. He ranted at David

:05:56.:06:01.

and ranted over me. I tried to link to the programme. I was quite

:06:01.:06:05.

worried it would turn very very nasty. He was turning very hostile

:06:05.:06:10.

and aggressive and so I kept smiling throughout and tried to make a joke

:06:10.:06:19.

of it. The gestures... He was off-camera and his microphone was

:06:19.:06:24.

shut off but he was shouting so much they picked it up on my microphone.

:06:24.:06:30.

I thought the best way to handle it was to make light of it.

:06:30.:06:35.

gestures offended many people. say they offended people, I'm sure

:06:35.:06:40.

they offended some and some people like to be offended. I have never

:06:40.:06:43.

had a reaction to anything I have broadcast in my life like this

:06:43.:06:50.

positive reaction. You do not think it was a problem? It was an attempt

:06:50.:06:57.

to keep it light and not let it go heavy. Charlie Skelton wrote a piece

:06:57.:07:01.

saying before the show I told the producers what would happen, this is

:07:01.:07:06.

sport, not journalism. He thinks it was an attack on measured thinking.

:07:06.:07:10.

All programmes have a range of people they think of inviting on and

:07:10.:07:16.

they decide. Once were not can sometimes be disgruntled and I file

:07:16.:07:22.

him under that. And there is nothing in hindsight you would change?

:07:22.:07:26.

not something I would like to do every week and I would not like to

:07:26.:07:30.

see Mr Janes in a hurry but every now and again programmes take risks.

:07:30.:07:36.

You take risks and judging by the people who watched it, it was

:07:36.:07:40.

different, it was interesting and it shows you what can happen in a

:07:40.:07:44.

culture where people shout at each other and so much of American media

:07:44.:07:49.

now is people shouting at each other and if you want a lesson of a road

:07:49.:07:54.

we should not be going down, that is a good six minutes to watch. Andrew

:07:54.:08:00.

Neil, thank you. Please tell us your thoughts about that interview or

:08:00.:08:08.

anything on BBC News. Details are coming up later. Before that, the

:08:08.:08:12.

announcement Prince Philip was going into hospital for an operation was

:08:12.:08:16.

followed on Saturday by News Nelson Mandela had also been admitted to

:08:16.:08:26.
:08:26.:08:47.

hospital. What followed prompted devastation in parts of Germany and

:08:47.:08:50.

Hungary and some viewers feel they have not been adequately represented

:08:50.:09:00.
:09:00.:09:12.

on BBC News. Colin Thomas is one of on the news at six, a report on

:09:12.:09:18.

Wednesday about Heathrow airport scheduling time to resurface the

:09:18.:09:22.

runways and Thursdays peace which fitted cameras onto 50 cats to find

:09:22.:09:27.

out what they get up to. Following the latter, Sophie Raworth told

:09:27.:09:34.

viewers... If you want to see more about cats, watch the Horizon

:09:34.:09:44.
:09:44.:10:10.

programme on BBC Two. Mark sent us the new look BBC News moved into

:10:10.:10:15.

central London in March and it's proved controversial. Notably, the

:10:15.:10:20.

newsroom is visible behind the presenters. This can lead to also of

:10:20.:10:25.

distractions, sometimes royal ones in the background. One viewer has

:10:25.:10:30.

called ass about another aspect of the new studio. I have noticed every

:10:30.:10:36.

time the new starts you have no cameraman behind the cameras. Do you

:10:36.:10:46.

use robotic cameras? Well, we reassure Robert that as well as

:10:46.:10:50.

robotic cameras, including this one, there are real human cameramen and

:10:50.:10:56.

women at work. As for the robot cameras, Chris Eakin found out they

:10:56.:11:01.

do not always do what they are told. In a moment, we will be joined by

:11:01.:11:06.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS