Browse content similar to 03/07/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Tonight we are in Croydon and welcome to Question Time. | :00:00. | :00:19. | |
Good evening to you home. Here in our audience, an audience that will | :00:20. | :00:23. | |
be putting questions as yet unknown to our panel. Our panel tonight, | :00:24. | :00:29. | |
Labour's former Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, Liberal Democrat Business | :00:30. | :00:32. | |
Minister, Jo Swinson, Conservative chairman of the Select Committee on | :00:33. | :00:36. | |
public administration, Bernard Jenkin, Christine Blower, General | :00:37. | :00:41. | |
Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, and Mail on Sunday | :00:42. | :00:45. | |
columnist Peter Hitchens, we are grateful to him for coming in at | :00:46. | :00:51. | |
short notice to replace the Daily Mail editor, who is indisposed. | :00:52. | :00:58. | |
APPLAUSE Remember, as ever, you can join in | :00:59. | :01:11. | |
this debate by text or Twitter: Let's have our first question | :01:12. | :01:17. | |
tonight please. Is the NUT strike action justifiable as it will risk | :01:18. | :01:25. | |
parents lives, hold back education and damage the profession. The NUP | :01:26. | :01:33. | |
strike, planned next week, is it justifiable? Bernard Jenkin. This is | :01:34. | :01:37. | |
really a dispute about pensions. There've been plenty of public | :01:38. | :01:42. | |
sector employees who have had their pensions changed because the | :01:43. | :01:47. | |
pensions were very generous compared to what you can now get in the | :01:48. | :01:51. | |
private sector. The police can't go on strike. The armed forces can't go | :01:52. | :01:55. | |
on strike. I don't think it is right that teachers go on strike. What | :01:56. | :01:59. | |
about the inconvenience it causes to others, not just disrupting the | :02:00. | :02:04. | |
children's education, but to the parents who've their working lives | :02:05. | :02:08. | |
disrupted and possibly affecting their income tax? No, it is not | :02:09. | :02:13. | |
right. It is an extraordinary thing. There are so teaching associations | :02:14. | :02:17. | |
who don't agree with strikes. They are not going on strike. It is only | :02:18. | :02:22. | |
the NUP that is organising a strike. I think it is unfortunate that a | :02:23. | :02:27. | |
profession as important as teaching is infected with this kind of | :02:28. | :02:32. | |
old-fashioned 1960s adversarial Labour trade union approach to | :02:33. | :02:40. | |
resolving disputes. APPLAUSE | :02:41. | :02:42. | |
Straight to a member of the audience there. Do you not think that | :02:43. | :02:47. | |
teachers have a point when pay has been cut in real terms over the last | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
four years? I'm a secondary school teacher in South London. I would be | :02:53. | :02:58. | |
happy to have my pay increases index linked to MPs' pay increases who I | :02:59. | :03:02. | |
gather are getting 11% next year. No, we are not. | :03:03. | :03:05. | |
APPLAUSE Are you going on strike on Thursday? | :03:06. | :03:12. | |
I beg your pardon? Are you going on strike on Thursday? I'm not. I'm not | :03:13. | :03:18. | |
a member of the NUT, the but I would if it actioned it. My union hasn't | :03:19. | :03:25. | |
balloted yet. The Association of Teachers and Lecturers. Christine | :03:26. | :03:28. | |
Blower, cue be a recruiting Sergeant for him. Strike action isn't the | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
only thing that the National Union of Teachers is doing. We have for a | :03:33. | :03:36. | |
good number of months been running a stand up for education campaign. | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
Members have been out on Saturdays and the weekend in town centres and | :03:41. | :03:45. | |
city centres, engaging parents, governors and young people to | :03:46. | :03:49. | |
explain why we think that very many elements of Government policy on | :03:50. | :03:53. | |
education are wrong. Also on June 10th, teachers covered for each | :03:54. | :03:58. | |
other. In some cases the head teachers allowed them to come to | :03:59. | :04:01. | |
London and lobby MPs. We lobbied 156. That's about a quarter of all | :04:02. | :04:08. | |
the MPs in the House. Including me. Bernard was also lobbied by two NUU | :04:09. | :04:16. | |
members. We are also organising, plagiarising this, Question Times up | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
and down the country, inviting prospective parliamentary | :04:21. | :04:22. | |
candidates... But you are going on strike. That's what the question is | :04:23. | :04:27. | |
about. You are going on strike, which is what the questioner says, | :04:28. | :04:31. | |
it affects parents and children. But I want you to know that it is not | :04:32. | :04:37. | |
the only thing we are doing. Yes, next week we have called strike | :04:38. | :04:41. | |
action. We will be the only teachers' union on strike, but we'll | :04:42. | :04:42. | |
be on strike with Unison, the Unite. It is quite broad. It is not | :04:43. | :04:55. | |
only about pensions but pay. Significantly, it is about workload. | :04:56. | :05:00. | |
Michael will shore says that at the end of the fifth year of teaching, | :05:01. | :05:05. | |
only two out of every five teachers who starts in the profession is | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
still there. That's at least in part because at the moment teachers are | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
working 60-hour weeks. They are not spending that time writing exciting | :05:15. | :05:18. | |
lesson plans and doing all the things they want to do. It is very | :05:19. | :05:23. | |
largely to do with the dead hand of an accountability regime. Our | :05:24. | :05:26. | |
dispute with Government is not just about pay. Not just about pensions. | :05:27. | :05:31. | |
It is also about that. The fact is that we are heading towards the | :05:32. | :05:36. | |
place where we will not be able to recruit enough teachers unless we | :05:37. | :05:41. | |
get the pay right but also critically we get the conditions | :05:42. | :05:45. | |
right. So it is across the board for all of those things. | :05:46. | :05:51. | |
APPLAUSE Peter Hitchens? The right to strike | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
is an incredibly valuable part of any free society. I'm very much in | :05:57. | :06:02. | |
favour of it being maintained, but the... | :06:03. | :06:03. | |
APPLAUSE Those who decide when to wield it | :06:04. | :06:07. | |
have to be careful when at the do soft. It simply isn't the case that | :06:08. | :06:11. | |
you can do it when you feel like it or to pursue a political campaign. | :06:12. | :06:15. | |
It must u feel like it or to pursue a political campaign. It must only | :06:16. | :06:17. | |
be done - it is almost a nuclear option. It's the thing that you | :06:18. | :06:20. | |
actually do eventually when you really have no alternative. I | :06:21. | :06:22. | |
honestly don't believe you have no alternative. | :06:23. | :06:25. | |
The other thing I might point out to Christine Blower is. This the main | :06:26. | :06:30. | |
beneficiary of your strike is Michael Gove, a man I believe is a | :06:31. | :06:34. | |
much overrated Education Secretary... | :06:35. | :06:35. | |
APPLAUSE He will make a great deal of the | :06:36. | :06:38. | |
fact that you are opposing him and will be delighted to the fact that | :06:39. | :06:43. | |
you are publicly opposing him. He will be able to point to the huge | :06:44. | :06:47. | |
disruption to parents. Anyone in the public sector, when they strike, it | :06:48. | :06:50. | |
is not against the Government but against the public. I don't think | :06:51. | :06:55. | |
there is a more futile act that the union could undertake. | :06:56. | :06:57. | |
APPLAUSE You on the left there. I think I | :06:58. | :07:01. | |
agree with your point. If anyone should have a voice it is teachers | :07:02. | :07:04. | |
to. But surely if you are having an issue with the Government, that | :07:05. | :07:09. | |
shouldn't come to the detriment of pupils. We are trying as hard as you | :07:10. | :07:12. | |
do. We want you to succeed, to do well, but if you are not there, we | :07:13. | :07:16. | |
cannot help you and you cannot help us. Surely there must be another way | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
over strike action that you can make yourself more improved but not at | :07:22. | :07:26. | |
the cost of the pupils. APPLAUSE | :07:27. | :07:29. | |
Jo Swinson? I have to say, that young woman there put pit incredibly | :07:30. | :07:33. | |
eloquently. ORCEDWHITE Jo Swinson? I have to say, that young woman there | :07:34. | :07:36. | |
put pit incredibly eloquently -- put it eloquently. Christine is right | :07:37. | :07:40. | |
that trade unions do a lot of good in our society. When we focus on the | :07:41. | :07:48. | |
ballot we are focusing on the part that the unions do, they do an | :07:49. | :07:52. | |
important roar in resolving disputes, and training. The other | :07:53. | :07:58. | |
things that trade unions do are more effective for achieving goals. It | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
has been an incredibly difficult four years. The economic crisis has | :08:03. | :08:05. | |
affected everybody. I understand that your members, Christine, the | :08:06. | :08:08. | |
gentleman in the audience and so on, people have been struggling with | :08:09. | :08:13. | |
very difficult pay in times of austerity. We've been trying to do | :08:14. | :08:17. | |
what we can as the Government to We've been trying to do what we can | :08:18. | :08:20. | |
as the Government to make things better - cutting taxes for people on | :08:21. | :08:23. | |
low earnings. But it is incredibly difficult. But that's the case for | :08:24. | :08:25. | |
people in the public sector. For people in the private sector as | :08:26. | :08:29. | |
well. As that young woman said, there is ultimately a very important | :08:30. | :08:32. | |
job still to be done in educating the next generation. I think it is | :08:33. | :08:36. | |
incredibly regrettable that this is going to be happening. Happening. I | :08:37. | :08:41. | |
hope it is just one day and will be able to be minimised in terms of the | :08:42. | :08:46. | |
disruption of pupils and parents of younger pupils. I hope that the NUT | :08:47. | :08:51. | |
can get round the table and have discussions constructively with the | :08:52. | :08:54. | |
Government to find resolutions to these issues. The man up there with | :08:55. | :08:59. | |
the beard and the T-shirt. I just think it is really important to note | :09:00. | :09:03. | |
that no teacher actually wants to go on strike. They all value their | :09:04. | :09:11. | |
work. When Michael Gove repeatedly disvalues, doesn't credit | :09:12. | :09:14. | |
professional opinion and advice, what else do you expect the teachers | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
to do to have their voices heard? Let me come to Bernard Jenkin on | :09:19. | :09:24. | |
that and then to you, Alan Johnson. I thought it was about pensions and | :09:25. | :09:28. | |
pay but it is sounding a more and more political strike as I hear more | :09:29. | :09:34. | |
and more being talked about. The stand up for education campaign. I | :09:35. | :09:39. | |
looked at the leaflets. There was very little about improving literacy | :09:40. | :09:44. | |
and numeracy in that campaign. That's not the style projected by | :09:45. | :09:48. | |
the National Union of Teachers. I think trade crowns are important. It | :09:49. | :09:50. | |
is important that they act in the interests of their members, but this | :09:51. | :09:55. | |
strike is not right. What about the Michael Gove point? Make your point | :09:56. | :10:01. | |
again. You said it's the only way of getting at Gove? Yes, he has | :10:02. | :10:07. | |
repeatedly ignored all the advice on how to handle teaching in this | :10:08. | :10:10. | |
country. I think you will find that's been said about virtually | :10:11. | :10:14. | |
every Education Secretary for 20 years. But Michael Gove more so than | :10:15. | :10:20. | |
anybody else. APPLAUSE | :10:21. | :10:25. | |
Alan Johnson? Well, I would like to start where Peter started. The | :10:26. | :10:30. | |
question was ever right to go on strike? And it is part of, an | :10:31. | :10:34. | |
important part of a mature democracy. The question was is this | :10:35. | :10:43. | |
strike justified in view of the disruption. I must have misheard it. | :10:44. | :10:49. | |
It is a fundamental part of a healthy mature democracy and | :10:50. | :10:52. | |
everyone someone is going on strike you condemn it. In terms of this | :10:53. | :10:56. | |
dispute, the lady there is right. A union no longer takes strike action, | :10:57. | :11:00. | |
if it ever did, without considering the pros and cons. For a start it | :11:01. | :11:04. | |
hat to be balloted industrial action. You have to prove that | :11:05. | :11:08. | |
you've got your members' support. In terms of what's happening at the | :11:09. | :11:10. | |
moment to people's pay and conditions, there's a good argument | :11:11. | :11:16. | |
for a stronger trade union movement in this country rather than a weaker | :11:17. | :11:19. | |
one. APPLAUSE | :11:20. | :11:24. | |
There is also a good argument about how restrained trade unions have | :11:25. | :11:27. | |
been in this country. If you look at other countries that have been going | :11:28. | :11:31. | |
through the austerity we've been. There's been a great deal of | :11:32. | :11:35. | |
restraint. I understand this industrial action. Two principal | :11:36. | :11:44. | |
reasons. Health workers... (Inaudible) Yes. The sky didn't fall | :11:45. | :11:52. | |
in. The world didn't end. I think a union that balances their | :11:53. | :11:55. | |
responsibility towards parents as well, and that's always, because you | :11:56. | :12:00. | |
can turn public opinion against you. When you look at the fact that in | :12:01. | :12:03. | |
the health service the recommendation of the pay review | :12:04. | :12:07. | |
body, which has never ever been rejected before, was rejected by | :12:08. | :12:11. | |
Jeremy Hunt. He said that health workers couldn't get a 1% pay | :12:12. | :12:18. | |
increase if they were on the incremental scale. If you look at | :12:19. | :12:24. | |
teaching and performance related pay introduced in schools, which is | :12:25. | :12:28. | |
affecting your children, because the bureaucracy that goes with it, I | :12:29. | :12:33. | |
guarantee that in five or ten years we won't hear more about | :12:34. | :12:37. | |
performance-based pay. It is a phase I hope they are going through and | :12:38. | :12:40. | |
we'll come out of the other end. These are big issues. They are | :12:41. | :12:44. | |
taking one day's industrial action to draw attention to it and given | :12:45. | :12:48. | |
all the frustrations they've faced, I think that's absolutely | :12:49. | :12:51. | |
defensible. APPLAUSE | :12:52. | :12:58. | |
Alan Johnson mentioned that you have to get your members on side. How | :12:59. | :13:02. | |
many of 300,000 teachers voted for this | :13:03. | :13:08. | |
strike action? We have two ballots, about 43% in one and less than that | :13:09. | :13:12. | |
in the other. You don't know the numbers I didn't bring them. 43% of | :13:13. | :13:18. | |
the 300,000? So under half voted for strike action and fewer in the | :13:19. | :13:22. | |
second ballot? Yep. So it is not popular with the teachers then. | :13:23. | :13:26. | |
Actually it is very pop larks because more of them take the | :13:27. | :13:30. | |
action. A you have to have a legitimate ballot. More people take | :13:31. | :13:34. | |
the action than vote. Just as more people are happy to see their MPs | :13:35. | :13:38. | |
than ever vote for them. We have a legitimate ballot. We've complied | :13:39. | :13:41. | |
with everything that the law requires us to comply with. The fact | :13:42. | :13:45. | |
is that people are following the strike call, yes. On the performance | :13:46. | :13:50. | |
related PayPoint, Alan is right. What's very interesting is that | :13:51. | :13:57. | |
Dominic Comings, previous adviser to Michael Gove, is saying that | :13:58. | :14:04. | |
performance related pay is wrong. Katherine Singh, who was chosen to | :14:05. | :14:09. | |
come and speak at the Conservative Party conference about free schools, | :14:10. | :14:14. | |
she is saying performance related pay, absolutely wrong. One issue of | :14:15. | :14:19. | |
this dispute is that we believe this is the wrong pay system to have in | :14:20. | :14:24. | |
schools. It links teachers' pay much too closely and America knitsically | :14:25. | :14:29. | |
to student outcomes. Bernard Jenkin, you are nodding in agreement? I am | :14:30. | :14:35. | |
sceptical. The whole public sector works on my committee and the way | :14:36. | :14:41. | |
the public sector is rewarded. Most people work in the Civil Service | :14:42. | :14:44. | |
because they believe in what they are doing. The reward they want is | :14:45. | :14:48. | |
to want to work in a trusting environment. They want too be | :14:49. | :14:51. | |
valued, supported and they want to work in an environment where when | :14:52. | :14:56. | |
things go wrong they learn with their bosses and suborder that's in | :14:57. | :15:04. | |
about what's gone wrong. To have this transactional relationship in | :15:05. | :15:08. | |
such a vocation is a misunderstanding. It is rather the | :15:09. | :15:12. | |
fashion that people have to be on performance related pay but people | :15:13. | :15:17. | |
don't live in these relationships happily. | :15:18. | :15:28. | |
the public sector at the moment. I liked everything Bernard Jenkins was | :15:29. | :15:31. | |
saying, but none of that is how it feels on the receiving end in the | :15:32. | :15:34. | |
public sector where jobs are being cut. Austerity, it's hard | :15:35. | :15:39. | |
everywhere, but we are seeing the public sector being taken apart, | :15:40. | :15:44. | |
dismembered piece by piece in education, in... Can I say very | :15:45. | :15:48. | |
briefly in response to that lady - it doesn't feel that in the | :15:49. | :15:53. | |
poorly-led schools and education. I'm not in schools, I'm just talking | :15:54. | :15:57. | |
about the public sector. We need to think about how we want people to | :15:58. | :16:04. | |
feel. What are you in fact? A local council employee. I was an | :16:05. | :16:10. | |
industrial reporter during the great years of the incessant strikes in | :16:11. | :16:14. | |
this country and saw many, many people using the nuclear option and | :16:15. | :16:18. | |
almost invariably they destroyed the industries they claimed to be saving | :16:19. | :16:22. | |
and it does not actually do any good. It's usually disastrous for | :16:23. | :16:25. | |
the industry and Alan Johnson's industry, the Post Office, was | :16:26. | :16:31. | |
almost ruined by strike action and has almost never recovered. Peter is | :16:32. | :16:35. | |
going back to the days when he was industrial correspondent for the | :16:36. | :16:39. | |
Socialist Worker and what happened every time we had a strike, we had a | :16:40. | :16:44. | |
socialist worker say, spread the strike, don't resolve it, spread it. | :16:45. | :16:50. | |
He is right about one thing, things have changed dramatically since the | :16:51. | :16:57. | |
70s. When I was in my tank top and flares I said when we were in the | :16:58. | :17:00. | |
Trade Union that is what we should have done. Certainly now, within | :17:01. | :17:09. | |
people are closely regular gated, when unions are regulated more than | :17:10. | :17:12. | |
anywhere else in the world, when you are getting to the stage to take | :17:13. | :17:17. | |
strike action, it's very different to the days we remember in the 70s. | :17:18. | :17:22. | |
Another question from Diane Squires, please? Is David Cameron a hero for | :17:23. | :17:29. | |
standing up to Europe? Is David Cameron a hero for standing | :17:30. | :17:37. | |
up to Europe? There were some answers there? Jean-Claude Juncker, | :17:38. | :17:41. | |
of course, only two people voted against him. Alan Johnson? Is he a | :17:42. | :17:47. | |
hero? Poor David. No, someone should buy him a book on the art of | :17:48. | :17:54. | |
negotiation. I mean, the poor man. APPLAUSE | :17:55. | :17:58. | |
Every time an MP, Tory MP is under threat of deselection, David writes | :17:59. | :18:02. | |
the local party and they get deselected. He supported Maria | :18:03. | :18:09. | |
Miller. He supported her and yew The Knew she was going to be gone. He | :18:10. | :18:13. | |
was the only man who could unite Europe in fave of Juncker. He needed | :18:14. | :18:18. | |
roughly four European Union countries with the right number of | :18:19. | :18:24. | |
votes to block it and his approach was totally wrong and if people | :18:25. | :18:27. | |
think he's a hero for that, they would have thought he was a hero | :18:28. | :18:33. | |
back in December 2011 when he vetoed that directive. That went through. | :18:34. | :18:37. | |
It went through. The veto meant absolutely nothing. I'm concerned | :18:38. | :18:42. | |
about this because I'm pro-Europe and I tell you someone else who is | :18:43. | :18:48. | |
as well - David Cameron. If you read Cameron's speech, his Bloomberg | :18:49. | :18:52. | |
speech, where at the end, he put in a bit to please people like Bernard | :18:53. | :18:57. | |
and his backbenchers, he made a very powerful case for Europe, one of the | :18:58. | :19:00. | |
best arguments I've ever seen. The bit at the end wassen about what's | :19:01. | :19:04. | |
right for this country, it's about what's right for the Conservative | :19:05. | :19:07. | |
Party and this's the truth of where they are going in terms of this | :19:08. | :19:15. | |
policy on a referendum. APPLAUSE | :19:16. | :19:18. | |
Peter Hitchens? I'm amazed that this complete fake has achieved such | :19:19. | :19:24. | |
success, that somebody can go... APPLAUSE | :19:25. | :19:28. | |
Somebody who loves the European Union, the words European Union run | :19:29. | :19:31. | |
through him as they run through a stick of rock, a man who a couple | :19:32. | :19:36. | |
years ago made a speech saying the European Union should be extended to | :19:37. | :19:43. | |
the Ural Mountains. This person, one of the most pro-European countries | :19:44. | :19:49. | |
probably, he's an opponent of Brussels. He's a tribute either to | :19:50. | :19:53. | |
the amazing powers of spin of the Conservative Party or the | :19:54. | :19:56. | |
extraordinary gullibility of members of the population. I just can't | :19:57. | :19:59. | |
understand how anyone can swallow it. He got into this position by | :20:00. | :20:04. | |
accident. He was wrongly briefed by somebody who told him that he could | :20:05. | :20:08. | |
have an easy victory against Juncker because they thought that Angela | :20:09. | :20:12. | |
Merkel was against it. When it turned out she wasn't, he decided to | :20:13. | :20:16. | |
do a huge reverse ferret and, instead of being the great victor | :20:17. | :20:20. | |
who got rid of Jean-Claude Juncker, he'll be the lone opponent of him, | :20:21. | :20:24. | |
along with the Hungarians. This is all completely staged, it has no | :20:25. | :20:27. | |
content at all. David Cameron, if it ever came to a referendum, one of | :20:28. | :20:32. | |
the many post-dates chequed he signed which he almost certainly | :20:33. | :20:36. | |
won't have to honour, if it ever came to a referendum, it would | :20:37. | :20:40. | |
without doubt urge everybody to vote to stay in it. He has no intention | :20:41. | :20:44. | |
to stay in this country. His whole stand against the European Union is | :20:45. | :20:53. | |
phoney. The supposed Euro-sceptics in the Conservative Party - what | :20:54. | :20:57. | |
does that mean, Euro-sceptic, what is there to doubt? You are in fave | :20:58. | :21:01. | |
of leaving it or in fave of staying in it. David Cameron's in fave of | :21:02. | :21:05. | |
staying in it. I don't know what Mr Jenkins is in favour of because, at | :21:06. | :21:09. | |
the moment, he's able to avoid the question thanks to his performance. | :21:10. | :21:12. | |
The Conservative Party in general is and always has been the most | :21:13. | :21:15. | |
pro-Brussels party in the country and for it to pretend to be | :21:16. | :21:21. | |
otherwise is an extraordinary act of dishonesty and anyone who believes | :21:22. | :21:24. | |
it, it's an extraordinary act of gullibility. | :21:25. | :21:29. | |
Many hands up. I'd better let Bernard Jenkin just comment on that. | :21:30. | :21:32. | |
Is your Prime Minister a hero for the way that he stood up? Just to | :21:33. | :21:38. | |
answer Peter's question to start with. If there was a vote tomorrow | :21:39. | :21:43. | |
as to whether we should stay in this centralised bureaucratic failing | :21:44. | :21:46. | |
mess that is the European Union, against which the Labour Party gave | :21:47. | :21:50. | |
away the veto on this question, we should have been able to veto the | :21:51. | :21:54. | |
President of the commission. Unfortunately, the Labour Party gave | :21:55. | :21:58. | |
that veto. Could you carry on with if? I would vote to leave. But what | :21:59. | :22:02. | |
I hope we can do is renegotiate a different relationship. If that's | :22:03. | :22:07. | |
not possible, I will vote to leave and a I want you to have the choice, | :22:08. | :22:11. | |
you see. David Cameron wants you to have the choice. The Labour Party | :22:12. | :22:14. | |
doesn't want you to have the choice. Is David Cameron a hero? | :22:15. | :22:17. | |
Israil-Lebanoning a hero for doing this one thing, which is going into | :22:18. | :22:22. | |
opposition in the European Union where you have the majority votes, | :22:23. | :22:27. | |
not pretending to agree when he doesn't agree, openly saying I don't | :22:28. | :22:33. | |
agree. There were heads of state whispering behind their hands | :22:34. | :22:36. | |
agreeing but they were worried about the Germans. Germany is now the most | :22:37. | :22:44. | |
powerful country in Europe, and even Chancellor Merkel would quite like | :22:45. | :22:49. | |
to not have had this person, but she was frog marched by her backbenchers | :22:50. | :22:54. | |
who told her that she wanted Jean-Claude Juncker and that's the | :22:55. | :22:57. | |
end of it. So she's no hero but Cameron? I think he is, for pointing | :22:58. | :23:02. | |
out that a spade is a spade and this is not the one we wanted so I'm not | :23:03. | :23:10. | |
voting for him. You in the front row? I wouldn't | :23:11. | :23:14. | |
call David Cameron a hero but it was nice to see him stand up for British | :23:15. | :23:17. | |
interests. I mean, after the European election result, it's clear | :23:18. | :23:20. | |
that the British people want a referendum on the membership of the | :23:21. | :23:25. | |
European Union and whether he sticks to it or not is probably a different | :23:26. | :23:32. | |
story. He's slightly phoney on this, but I think... If he doesn't do it, | :23:33. | :23:38. | |
he'll really have some problems with backbenchers? He's got backbenchers | :23:39. | :23:43. | |
like you and UKIP to kick him up the backside if he doesn't do it. No | :23:44. | :23:50. | |
doubt the Liberal Democrats and Labour are going to block that Bill. | :23:51. | :23:54. | |
Well, I hope they are not going to because the signs are that they are | :23:55. | :23:58. | |
going to let it through, then we can put it through the House of Lords. | :23:59. | :24:03. | |
You might as well offer a referendum as well. Everyone else wants it. I'm | :24:04. | :24:10. | |
not saying that. APPLAUSE | :24:11. | :24:16. | |
I'm just saying, a referendum is in people's interests. My generation's | :24:17. | :24:19. | |
never had a say. I don't know whether I would like to stay in or | :24:20. | :24:23. | |
leave but I would like to have a stay of whether I want to stay in | :24:24. | :24:27. | |
the European superstate and do I leave? I don't know, I would like to | :24:28. | :24:31. | |
stay but the way things are going with the increasing power in | :24:32. | :24:35. | |
Brussels, it's alienating for someone like me. Doesn't he make you | :24:36. | :24:40. | |
a tiny bit suspicious that this referendum is being offered more | :24:41. | :24:47. | |
than two years hence after that? It does. I feel as though it's | :24:48. | :24:55. | |
because... If helps a referendum, he can hold it now. It's because of | :24:56. | :25:00. | |
UKIP, that's why he's offering it. I'll come to you and the man at the | :25:01. | :25:04. | |
top, to the man who says he's waving. I wonder whether the Scots | :25:05. | :25:12. | |
feel the same about Westminster. They are not having a referendum, | :25:13. | :25:19. | |
you see. Good question. Interesting question that, very good question. I | :25:20. | :25:23. | |
would say that I hope the Scots are going to vote no. If in two years' | :25:24. | :25:28. | |
time on this concocted referendum on a time scale to do with the Tory | :25:29. | :25:32. | |
party, not national interest, if they did vote to leave, if we voted | :25:33. | :25:37. | |
to leave the European Union, the Scots would demand another | :25:38. | :25:40. | |
referendum and I bet they would leave the UK. That's a very real... | :25:41. | :25:50. | |
The Scots elected the MEPs. Christine Blower, you cited Unite, | :25:51. | :26:10. | |
you were going on strike with them, you cited them with approval, they | :26:11. | :26:13. | |
have asked for Labour to have a referendum on the EU, McCluskey | :26:14. | :26:18. | |
wants it, would you join him? It's not the policy of the NUT to have a | :26:19. | :26:22. | |
referendum, we don't have policy in this area. Your policy, as a | :26:23. | :26:27. | |
politician yourself? Well, I'm in a very interesting position which is | :26:28. | :26:30. | |
that when we very first went in, I voted no. But I now think that it's | :26:31. | :26:34. | |
absolutely right for Britain to be in Europe and if there were a | :26:35. | :26:37. | |
referendum, I would actually personally vote to stay in, but that | :26:38. | :26:42. | |
isn't the policy of the National Union of Teachers, we don't have | :26:43. | :26:45. | |
policy. You said personally you would vote to stay in. Would you | :26:46. | :26:50. | |
like to see Labour offer that choice, as speaking personally? What | :26:51. | :26:56. | |
the Labour Party's said is if there were significant changes to | :26:57. | :26:58. | |
treaties, they said there would be a referendum and it seems to me, that | :26:59. | :27:02. | |
is a reasonable position, that if there is a significant change in | :27:03. | :27:06. | |
terms of the relationship, the way Europe works, that that might be a | :27:07. | :27:09. | |
point at which you make the decision. I happen to think the idea | :27:10. | :27:16. | |
of offering a referendum beyond the next election is a bit phoney and I | :27:17. | :27:21. | |
think it's destabilising and unsettling. Mr McCluskey says Ed | :27:22. | :27:28. | |
Miliband's going to have a difficult job explaining why he's not joining | :27:29. | :27:33. | |
other parties on offering a vote that's grown concern? Well, | :27:34. | :27:40. | |
that's... So they should do it? That is the policy of ewe but it isn't | :27:41. | :27:48. | |
the policy of my union. Jo Swinson? Do you remember the question? It | :27:49. | :27:57. | |
was, is he a hero. We are on a coalition Government, so my answer | :27:58. | :28:02. | |
to that question is no. I actually think the stoking up of | :28:03. | :28:08. | |
anti-European sentiment is not particularly Consignia deucive to | :28:09. | :28:11. | |
our national interest -- condusive. Whether it's on trade or jobs, we | :28:12. | :28:18. | |
rely on other countries. I think that is an important relationship | :28:19. | :28:27. | |
for the UK to have. I hope in a future referendum and I think | :28:28. | :28:31. | |
there'll be one, I hope we'll vote to stay in. It's not a perfect set | :28:32. | :28:35. | |
of institutions, we'll reform it. Then it comes down to typing. Rather | :28:36. | :28:40. | |
than picking a date out of the air at random of saying it should be | :28:41. | :28:43. | |
2017, what we have legislated for is picking up exactly on the point the | :28:44. | :28:47. | |
gentleman in the middle say, he said he felt uncomfortable about more | :28:48. | :28:50. | |
powers going to the European Union. So when there is a treaty change | :28:51. | :28:55. | |
and, of course, it's feasible that with all of the changes in the | :28:56. | :29:00. | |
eurozone as they work themselves out after the financial crisis that we | :29:01. | :29:04. | |
faced, that there may well be some treaty change and at that point the | :29:05. | :29:09. | |
referendum would kick in as per legislation. What changed your mind | :29:10. | :29:14. | |
on all this because you used to say the exact opposite, never good | :29:15. | :29:18. | |
having a vote on the Lisbon treat eye, you said we needed a vote on | :29:19. | :29:22. | |
the principle. Why did you change your mind? Why don't you ask Clegg | :29:23. | :29:27. | |
who is against it to say we'll do well with the British public? If | :29:28. | :29:30. | |
there's treaty change we should have a vote but the only sensible | :29:31. | :29:34. | |
question would be to have whether we are in or out of the European Union. | :29:35. | :29:40. | |
It's dishonest this, because the European Union treaties take power | :29:41. | :29:44. | |
from our own country every day, every court judgment, every new | :29:45. | :29:47. | |
directive is taking power from our country. If we want that to stop, we | :29:48. | :29:52. | |
need to change the treaties. If we won't, then you have to accept the | :29:53. | :29:57. | |
city of London becomes regulated by the European Union and we have open | :29:58. | :30:00. | |
borders with the rest of the European Union, we can't control | :30:01. | :30:02. | |
immigration with the rest of the European Union. We are going to have | :30:03. | :30:06. | |
to accept that all these things keep happening and there's nothing we can | :30:07. | :30:07. | |
do about it. This sounds like Batman and the | :30:08. | :30:29. | |
Riddler. The other three main parties, up against this situation | :30:30. | :30:32. | |
with regards to us having a referendum. Why cannot the British | :30:33. | :30:38. | |
people be allowed to put the great back into Great Britain and give us | :30:39. | :30:42. | |
a referendum so we can make up our own minds? We are the experts out | :30:43. | :30:47. | |
here. We know what's going down. Let's put the great back into Great | :30:48. | :30:53. | |
Britain. You Sir, what do you think? I'm coming back to the fundamental | :30:54. | :30:56. | |
point about David Cameron. He missed a chance where he could have | :30:57. | :31:02. | |
nominated an alternative to Juncker. By staying in the EPP and getting it | :31:03. | :31:06. | |
sorted out there. Wouldn't need to be a hero. The woman there in the | :31:07. | :31:14. | |
second row. I think a yes/no referendum is too simplistic for | :31:15. | :31:19. | |
such a complex issue for the public to say no or yes. You need reform | :31:20. | :31:25. | |
and perhaps a better solution would be yes we want to stay in with no | :31:26. | :31:30. | |
reform. Yes we want to stay in but we want reform in the EU but we want | :31:31. | :31:40. | |
to come out completely. Yes and no is too much of a dichotomy. Too | :31:41. | :31:47. | |
brutal? Yes. But if there was a renegotiation and a Prime Minister, | :31:48. | :31:51. | |
say, Cameron, would say yes if he were in a position to do it, would | :31:52. | :31:57. | |
it be right to say yes or no? Yes, I think if there was a change in the | :31:58. | :32:02. | |
way the EU was run, I think you would be in a position to the say | :32:03. | :32:08. | |
yes or no. This is a myth. The whole idea of renegotiation is a fantasy. | :32:09. | :32:12. | |
Just as the idea that there is an alternative to Jean-Claude Juncker. | :32:13. | :32:16. | |
If it hadn't been Jean-Claude Juncker, the EU keeps cupboards full | :32:17. | :32:22. | |
of men in grey suits just like him. To complain that a European Union | :32:23. | :32:26. | |
official is a federalist is like complaining that a bicycle has | :32:27. | :32:31. | |
handlebars. That is what they are. There is no renegotiation. The | :32:32. | :32:34. | |
European Union has been since it began, and since the Treaty of Rome, | :32:35. | :32:40. | |
a clause calling for ever closer union. That means abolition of our | :32:41. | :32:48. | |
power. Mr Jenas, Jenas, he poses as an opponent of the European Union. | :32:49. | :32:53. | |
The European Arrest Warrant, which we have uniquely got out of, which | :32:54. | :32:59. | |
allow as magistrate in Europe to issue a warrant to somebody in this | :33:00. | :33:03. | |
country which we have to execute. We could if we wish opt ouch that. By a | :33:04. | :33:10. | |
unique anomaly of the European Union we can but they are not going. I am | :33:11. | :33:15. | |
completely at one with you. I'm going to vote defence this. It is | :33:16. | :33:20. | |
mad. We stood on the platform of the European elections saying we are | :33:21. | :33:25. | |
going to take back power over justice and European affairs. It is | :33:26. | :33:27. | |
bonkers. ALL TALK AT ONCE | :33:28. | :33:35. | |
It helps us to catch criminals. You don't have to be in the European | :33:36. | :33:42. | |
Union to get an extradition warrant. Without the European Arrest Warrant | :33:43. | :33:46. | |
we would never have got the London bombers. We would have had different | :33:47. | :33:54. | |
(Inaudible) Cameron picked the wrong fight. One of the reforms we are | :33:55. | :33:58. | |
trying to get out of Europe is making it more democratic. The point | :33:59. | :34:01. | |
was that Juncker was a democratic choice of the European Parliament. | :34:02. | :34:07. | |
We had only just elected. Would you like the next time there is a | :34:08. | :34:12. | |
general election here that the leader of the largest party wasn't | :34:13. | :34:16. | |
the Prime Minister? Or the leader of the country. That's what the lodge | :34:17. | :34:22. | |
irk of not having Juncker est party wasn't the Prime Minister? Or the | :34:23. | :34:24. | |
leader of the country. That's what the lodge irk of not having Juncker | :34:25. | :34:27. | |
was -- logic of not having Juncker was. He was the leading candidate | :34:28. | :34:30. | |
and he had just won that election. APPLAUSE | :34:31. | :34:33. | |
On that puzzle, we'll go on to another question. The Croydon MP | :34:34. | :34:42. | |
Richard Ottaway has suggested that residents who can't afford a house | :34:43. | :34:45. | |
in the area should move to Manchester. Do you agree? This was | :34:46. | :34:50. | |
Richard Ottaway's view. You should move to Manchester if you can't | :34:51. | :34:58. | |
afford to live in Croydon. Bernard Jenkin. That's my name. I called you | :34:59. | :35:05. | |
Patrick because I knew your father. I don't agree with my colleague. I | :35:06. | :35:09. | |
know what he's saying and I think it probably came out wrong. What we | :35:10. | :35:14. | |
need in London is to deal with this housing bubble, to have a lot more | :35:15. | :35:18. | |
homes built. And we need imagination. We are going to have to | :35:19. | :35:22. | |
have a lot of imagination to get it wrong. I was in opposition during | :35:23. | :35:31. | |
the 1990s and 2000s. We got very green-mind about building on green | :35:32. | :35:34. | |
fields and being against building on the countryside. We were very | :35:35. | :35:37. | |
against what Labour were trying to do. Now we are trying to do what | :35:38. | :35:40. | |
they were trying to do. We were wrong. We've got to build more homes | :35:41. | :35:45. | |
in the South East. But it comes down to this other point. We've got to | :35:46. | :35:50. | |
make it so that you can have a career in Manchester. You don't have | :35:51. | :35:54. | |
to come down to London. We have to focus the economic centre of graft | :35:55. | :35:59. | |
in our country. Re of graft in our country. | :36:00. | :35:59. | |
APPLAUSE -- gravity in our country. I think | :36:00. | :36:05. | |
what Lord Adonis announced this week, along the lines of what Lord | :36:06. | :36:11. | |
Heseltine announced a couple of years ago, reallocating resources so | :36:12. | :36:14. | |
they can be controlled and spent by local forces in different parts of | :36:15. | :36:18. | |
the country. Maybe we can go further and make much more tax-raising | :36:19. | :36:23. | |
power, more autonomy for the city regions. We've got to try and | :36:24. | :36:28. | |
balance out the fact we've got this megacity in London. A fantastic | :36:29. | :36:33. | |
global hub but it must not crowd out what's happening elsewhere in the | :36:34. | :36:39. | |
UK. You are saying we should be getting people on trains up to | :36:40. | :36:43. | |
Manchester? What's wrong with that? Alan grew up in Chelsea or Notting | :36:44. | :36:48. | |
Hill. He wouldn't be able to afford to live there now. Or perhaps you | :36:49. | :36:51. | |
do! LAUGHTER Have you got a policy to | :36:52. | :36:56. | |
allow him back in? Come on! There was a poll in the Standard. Kick the | :36:57. | :37:03. | |
Russians out and not allow people to move back into Kensington or | :37:04. | :37:07. | |
Chelsea? That's a yes. There was a poll in the Standard which showed | :37:08. | :37:12. | |
that most Londoners now think London property prices are too high and | :37:13. | :37:16. | |
should fall. That just shows how much people are worried that their | :37:17. | :37:21. | |
children and their grandchildren aren't going to be able to live in | :37:22. | :37:26. | |
the communities where they were born. Rosemary, do you agree with | :37:27. | :37:32. | |
what Richard Ottaway said? No, not at all. I find that I lose staff | :37:33. | :37:37. | |
because there's not enough affordable housing in the area. My | :37:38. | :37:40. | |
daughter has really struggled to get her foot on the housing ladder. | :37:41. | :37:46. | |
We've had to help her out. I think we do need more affordable housing | :37:47. | :37:51. | |
to support a cross range of the population. The high-end and it has | :37:52. | :37:58. | |
to be affordable for people that are in local authority jobs, teaching | :37:59. | :38:04. | |
positions, nursi staff. No, I don't agree with him. | :38:05. | :38:07. | |
APPLAUSE Christine Blower? Well, I'm in | :38:08. | :38:15. | |
agreement with what Bernard Jenkin has said. The royal institute of | :38:16. | :38:20. | |
architects this week brought out a report saying we need to build | :38:21. | :38:26. | |
300,000 homes a year for the future, because we haven't been building | :38:27. | :38:30. | |
enough. We do have to think about whether every bit of the green belt | :38:31. | :38:36. | |
is doing what it needs to do. Critically we have to make sure | :38:37. | :38:39. | |
there are affordable houses for people who want to stay in the area | :38:40. | :38:43. | |
where they grew up. I live in Hammersmith and Fulham, where almost | :38:44. | :38:47. | |
all the development over the past eight years has been distinctly | :38:48. | :38:54. | |
unaffordable for anyone who is the son or daughter of working people | :38:55. | :38:57. | |
who live in Hammersmith. How do you achieve it? Well, you obviously have | :38:58. | :39:02. | |
a policy of building some social housing and some part ownership, all | :39:03. | :39:06. | |
of those things. But you have to think about where else you can | :39:07. | :39:11. | |
build. The fact is that, according to the architects, there are bits of | :39:12. | :39:15. | |
the green belt on which we can build, because it is not good | :39:16. | :39:20. | |
amenity green belt. We have to use all the brownfield sites we've got, | :39:21. | :39:27. | |
but we have to make sure brownfield sites we've got, but we have to make | :39:28. | :39:30. | |
sure that there aren't - I believe there are large number obvious these | :39:31. | :39:33. | |
- numbers of unoccupied house in this city centres, whether in London | :39:34. | :39:37. | |
or Manchester. Absolutely, I think that we shouldn't be focusing | :39:38. | :39:41. | |
everything on London and the South East. I don't personally want to go | :39:42. | :39:45. | |
and live in Manchester, because I live in London and have lived in | :39:46. | :39:50. | |
London for a long time. But die want there to be sufficient -- but I do | :39:51. | :39:56. | |
want there to be sufficient housing in Manchester for people to be able | :39:57. | :40:00. | |
to sustain themselves in their own home on the kinds of jobs that they | :40:01. | :40:04. | |
can get. Ottaway's point was that it is much cheaper to live in | :40:05. | :40:07. | |
Manchester and you should leave London if you can't afford to live | :40:08. | :40:11. | |
here. But there is no reason why people should have to leave in | :40:12. | :40:14. | |
London if they want to live in London. Manchester is a vibrant and | :40:15. | :40:19. | |
wonderful city, but I don't think people should be forced to move to | :40:20. | :40:25. | |
other parts of the country. They are in the BBC. The BBC forces them all | :40:26. | :40:32. | |
to go and live in Salford. It is common in the area where I represent | :40:33. | :40:37. | |
that people who are trying to get on the housing ladder can't necessarily | :40:38. | :40:42. | |
do so easily close to the area where they grew up. They might have to | :40:43. | :40:46. | |
move a little further away initially as they get on the housing ladder. I | :40:47. | :40:51. | |
think 200 miles is a little extreme for that. People do live in | :40:52. | :40:56. | |
communities. Those family ties can be incredibly important. Do you | :40:57. | :40:59. | |
think the right number of houses are being built? If not, why not? We | :41:00. | :41:05. | |
need to build more houses. We are building more. We are. 450,000 since | :41:06. | :41:11. | |
the general election, which is a significant increase, more than | :41:12. | :41:14. | |
double the amount that were being built. But Harold Macmillan built | :41:15. | :41:21. | |
300,000 houses a year. That was when the population of the country was | :41:22. | :41:24. | |
smaller. Why couldn't you have done that? We do need to ramp up and | :41:25. | :41:29. | |
build more. Then why haven't new Various things have made it | :41:30. | :41:31. | |
difficult, not least construction and the economic crisis that we | :41:32. | :41:35. | |
faced. We are looking at more garden cities, to have new places with good | :41:36. | :41:40. | |
transport lines that can become new hubs and new communities. I think we | :41:41. | :41:44. | |
need to get a lot more inventive with brownfield. It strikes me, I | :41:45. | :41:49. | |
never cease to be surprised in London, some little corners in zone | :41:50. | :41:55. | |
1 or zone 2 and you have der lit buildings. I don't want to stop you | :41:56. | :42:02. | |
in full flow. What can you do, you say we haven't built enough houses, | :42:03. | :42:06. | |
but what can you do to get developers to build on the | :42:07. | :42:10. | |
brownfield sites, where they seem unwilling to do? Or are you saying | :42:11. | :42:14. | |
that councils should build more house insist Councils also should. | :42:15. | :42:19. | |
One of the things that Nick Clegg set out clearly in terms of our | :42:20. | :42:23. | |
plans for the future is to say we need to make sure once we've dealt | :42:24. | :42:26. | |
with the deficit we are changing the fiscal rules to make sure sure we | :42:27. | :42:30. | |
have investment and we borrow to invest in house building, because we | :42:31. | :42:34. | |
do need many more homes. That's the only solution to this issue. I think | :42:35. | :42:38. | |
one of the issues in London is the number of properties that are being | :42:39. | :42:42. | |
bought up by foreign investors and not even lived in. But empty | :42:43. | :42:47. | |
properties... APPLAUSE | :42:48. | :42:50. | |
What we have done, we've increased stamp duty in such circumstances to | :42:51. | :42:54. | |
15%, but do we need to look at whether there's more things to do? | :42:55. | :43:00. | |
We want to introduce a mansion tax. High-end property is undertaxed. | :43:01. | :43:05. | |
There's a range of different things, but we need to stop London being the | :43:06. | :43:11. | |
centre of the universe as far as our mind-set is concerned. There are | :43:12. | :43:14. | |
lots of different corners of this country that have a fantastic amount | :43:15. | :43:18. | |
to offer. Creative industries this Manchester, financial services in | :43:19. | :43:23. | |
Leeds or Edinburgh... Hull. I worked in Hull. Hull is wonderful too. | :43:24. | :43:33. | |
Harwich! OK. I think there is too much emphasis on houses and not | :43:34. | :43:37. | |
enough emphasis on homes. At the end of the day my best friend had to | :43:38. | :43:44. | |
leave his childhood home and now he can't go back there. People need | :43:45. | :43:48. | |
homes. If you are going to build houses you then need a hospital, a | :43:49. | :43:52. | |
school for people to go to. An infrastructure, a community. There | :43:53. | :43:57. | |
are so many empty houses out there. Croydon do ghost tours of all the | :43:58. | :44:01. | |
empty building. A councillor is telling you to leave when there are | :44:02. | :44:06. | |
properties empty there. What is a guest tour? Is it exciting? You | :44:07. | :44:11. | |
don't see actual ghosts. Just memories. They show properties no | :44:12. | :44:19. | |
longer in use? They go around the derelict buildings and say look at | :44:20. | :44:20. | |
how good this architecture at all. I think this is the mindset | :44:21. | :44:37. | |
of a number of Westminster MPs that when they look at this, they think | :44:38. | :44:41. | |
that the easiest thing is for people to up sticks and two because it's | :44:42. | :44:45. | |
not in their interests to have those people around. The trouble, is I | :44:46. | :44:48. | |
don't think it will hit home until the nanny of that person doesn't | :44:49. | :44:52. | |
turn up in the morning and the fire dozen get put out because there is | :44:53. | :44:55. | |
no firemen around the corner and the police don't turn up at his door. I | :44:56. | :45:02. | |
think for some of these people, only in time, the truth will hit home. | :45:03. | :45:09. | |
OK. Peter? Mr Ottaway seems to have done that thing which the | :45:10. | :45:14. | |
politicians here seem to do, the horrible thing politicians are never | :45:15. | :45:18. | |
supposed to do is tell the truth. It may be as a result the May have to | :45:19. | :45:23. | |
move out of Croydon, I don't know that. Will be up to you. This whole | :45:24. | :45:27. | |
subject is the reason why people like me have been banging on, as we | :45:28. | :45:31. | |
are accused of doing, about the European Union, because the reason | :45:32. | :45:35. | |
for our housing crisis is that we have had, thanks to our open | :45:36. | :45:39. | |
borders, imposed on us by the European Union, the greatest wave of | :45:40. | :45:43. | |
mass immigration in our national history, begun under Labour, | :45:44. | :45:47. | |
continued under the coalation and that's why there aren't enough | :45:48. | :45:49. | |
houses. There's another reason for it. | :45:50. | :45:58. | |
APPLAUSE. It's not because... Absolutely not | :45:59. | :46:03. | |
blaming immigrants, no. The people that came here were perfectly | :46:04. | :46:06. | |
reasonable to come here, encouraged to come here by Governments, they | :46:07. | :46:10. | |
came to better themselves, I don't blame them in the slightest. What I | :46:11. | :46:16. | |
blame, if you'll let me... My friend had to move out of his house because | :46:17. | :46:21. | |
the council realised they could sell it for ?2 million and some rich | :46:22. | :46:26. | |
people could move in. It's a separate issue. It's a housing | :46:27. | :46:31. | |
issue. To say that I'm blaming immigrants is a big, fat lie and I | :46:32. | :46:36. | |
reject it. It's to do with the politicians. They open the borders | :46:37. | :46:41. | |
and made it happen and we are going to have to find some accommodation, | :46:42. | :46:45. | |
but I do not think they should escape the blame. When we realised | :46:46. | :46:50. | |
that much of our country is going to have to be concreted over because of | :46:51. | :46:53. | |
this, we should always remember who made that happen. There is another | :46:54. | :46:58. | |
aspect of this, which is that Government after Government | :46:59. | :47:00. | |
repeatedly failing to find any way of generally stimulating the | :47:01. | :47:04. | |
economy's gone over and over again into the creation of housing bubbles | :47:05. | :47:07. | |
to create the illusion of prosperity. It's going on now, it's | :47:08. | :47:11. | |
dangerous for the economy and very, very bad for people who have to live | :47:12. | :47:15. | |
in houses. For most of us, it doesn't matter what your house is | :47:16. | :47:19. | |
worth, you can't sell it and two and live in a tent. What matters is | :47:20. | :47:24. | |
whether you can afford to buy it and whether your children will be able | :47:25. | :47:35. | |
to buy one or rent one. Mass immigration is to blame. | :47:36. | :47:39. | |
You at the very back? I have a couple of suggestions. We need to | :47:40. | :47:51. | |
have tax or Government policies whereby we can force land banks | :47:52. | :47:58. | |
built on, rather than waiting for inflated house prices to generate | :47:59. | :48:02. | |
major profit. Many the London area, we need to get a Government policy | :48:03. | :48:08. | |
for vacant houses and third, I do agree, immigration is also one of | :48:09. | :48:11. | |
the angles which we have to look into. We can't start categorising | :48:12. | :48:18. | |
people into giving them certain things because they are making this | :48:19. | :48:21. | |
valid point. It's high time we are all honest about this situation. I | :48:22. | :48:33. | |
heard arguments about this in Notting Hill when I lived there, | :48:34. | :48:37. | |
people coming over from the West Indies to drive buses, work in the | :48:38. | :48:42. | |
NHS and work in the Post Offices. We heard the same things then. I'm not | :48:43. | :48:48. | |
associating you with this, Peter. It's a straightforward smear. It's a | :48:49. | :48:55. | |
smear. We have Mosley saying the same thing and it was always blame | :48:56. | :49:00. | |
the immigrants. Now, on this issue in particular, the argument is | :49:01. | :49:03. | |
ludicrous. The argument is ludicrous. There was a housing | :49:04. | :49:07. | |
crisis. David just mentioned 300,000 houses a year under Macmillan, | :49:08. | :49:15. | |
250,000 before him when Nye Bevan was the Housing Minister. In London | :49:16. | :49:30. | |
now ?135,000, four times the London average wage. The point Jo made was | :49:31. | :49:35. | |
right about the need to build extra houses and Bernard said it as well. | :49:36. | :49:38. | |
The time to have done it was over the last four years. It's never been | :49:39. | :49:45. | |
cheaper to construct houses than over the last four years. All these | :49:46. | :49:49. | |
houses are going to have to be built eventually. We could have stimulated | :49:50. | :49:53. | |
the economy, instead of that, Osborne cut back on the capital | :49:54. | :49:56. | |
spending budget and so we are still talking about the same things that | :49:57. | :50:00. | |
we should have been doing three or four years ago. | :50:01. | :50:05. | |
APPLAUSE The woman at the very back there? I | :50:06. | :50:10. | |
have to disagree about what at toeway said about having to up | :50:11. | :50:15. | |
sticks families away from the area if they can't afford it -- Ottaway. | :50:16. | :50:23. | |
The point is, there are families there that have family members to | :50:24. | :50:27. | |
help them look after their children. How would that work if they had to | :50:28. | :50:31. | |
move out of the area? The woman at the back? The housing crisis is due | :50:32. | :50:36. | |
to the widespread selling off of council property due to right-to-buy | :50:37. | :50:40. | |
which was one of the most devisive policies of the Tory Government. | :50:41. | :50:46. | |
Bernard Jenkins, do you want to answer that point? It's a policy the | :50:47. | :50:49. | |
Labour Party have carried on with and the people living in those | :50:50. | :50:53. | |
houses, whether they are owned by the council or somebody else, maybe | :50:54. | :50:57. | |
we should have built more council houses and we are now building more | :50:58. | :51:01. | |
council houses, but actually, every suggestion that's being made, when I | :51:02. | :51:05. | |
said I needed some imagination, we are going to have to build new | :51:06. | :51:10. | |
settlements, by new settlements and Boris has this great idea. Who is | :51:11. | :51:16. | |
Boris? Who is Boris? Erm, you're showing your age! Boris Johnson got | :51:17. | :51:21. | |
this brilliant idea of moving Heathrow Airport to the Thames | :51:22. | :51:25. | |
Estuary which would create a huge opportunity to create a new City on | :51:26. | :51:29. | |
the site of Heathrow, build hundreds of thousands of homes. Are you in | :51:30. | :51:33. | |
favour of that? Yes, I very much am. That is the kind of imagination we | :51:34. | :51:37. | |
need to tackle this problem. Can I just say one thing. We politicians | :51:38. | :51:42. | |
have allowed this extraordinary influx of population into this | :51:43. | :51:48. | |
country. I mean, the... That point's been made so I'll stop you there and | :51:49. | :51:51. | |
we'll go on to the final question because we have only a couple of | :51:52. | :51:55. | |
minutes left. Andy Richardson? Richardson?.s a recent pop list poll | :51:56. | :51:59. | |
described leading polices as weird, arrogant and out of touch. Are they? | :52:00. | :52:07. | |
CHEERING AND APPLAUSE -- populist poll. | :52:08. | :52:15. | |
You can answer that first, Bernard Jenkin? Given that about 0.01% of | :52:16. | :52:21. | |
the population is involved in active politics, that does make us pretty | :52:22. | :52:27. | |
weird, doesn't it, Alan? And Jo! We do tend to live in something of a | :52:28. | :52:31. | |
bubble in the Westminster village, but every MP goes to their | :52:32. | :52:36. | |
constituency at weekends and deals with everyone's very, very | :52:37. | :52:40. | |
straightforward problems and very difficult problems. And ignores | :52:41. | :52:47. | |
them. No, that's not true. No. You can always get a round of applause | :52:48. | :52:54. | |
by attacking politicians. This one is a poll that was done on what | :52:55. | :52:58. | |
people think, it's not a cheap round of applause, it's what people say. | :52:59. | :53:02. | |
You should answer what they say. I'm answering what they say. I do think | :53:03. | :53:06. | |
that politicians who say things like, people who go to food banks | :53:07. | :53:11. | |
are doing it as a lifestyle choice are clearly out of touch with what's | :53:12. | :53:22. | |
happening. I do think that there are many politicians, not all by any | :53:23. | :53:25. | |
means, but many politicians who do get out of touch, notwithstanding | :53:26. | :53:29. | |
the fact that they have to speak to their constituents when their | :53:30. | :53:35. | |
constituents come in. And they are a bit weird, as you say, because there | :53:36. | :53:40. | |
are so few people doing it. The serious point is, I think we | :53:41. | :53:43. | |
absolutely have to have politicians who understand what life is like for | :53:44. | :53:48. | |
working people who frankly there are plenty of working people having to | :53:49. | :53:52. | |
claim benefits because they are just in such a poor state. I really don't | :53:53. | :53:57. | |
think that the vast majority of politicians understand that. I think | :53:58. | :54:01. | |
that is a serious matter. Alan Johnson, weird? Do you think | :54:02. | :54:05. | |
yourself as weird? Well, many people would say that. You do? Look, this | :54:06. | :54:09. | |
is really serious and it's a big problem because there is this | :54:10. | :54:13. | |
disconnect and it's true, Bernard says it's always been the case, | :54:14. | :54:17. | |
there was never a stage when politicians were popular, if you | :54:18. | :54:22. | |
look back in history, even Winston Churchill after the Second World War | :54:23. | :54:25. | |
had an independent stand against him and get 10,000 votes in his own | :54:26. | :54:29. | |
constituency. It's got to a stage now, and that might be something to | :54:30. | :54:33. | |
do with the expenses scandal and other things where it's worrying, | :54:34. | :54:38. | |
you can't just dismiss this and say, as I would say, it's a noble | :54:39. | :54:41. | |
profession and anyone's welcome to join it and stand for election, it's | :54:42. | :54:46. | |
a great thing for us to have a democracy with people voting for the | :54:47. | :54:49. | |
people that represent them. Go to many places in the world not too far | :54:50. | :54:55. | |
away, go across to Russia, you will see communities that really would be | :54:56. | :54:58. | |
desperately keen to have that system, but if we've got to the | :54:59. | :55:03. | |
stage now where so many people feel this and whether it's the | :55:04. | :55:07. | |
institutions, whether it's the way MPs behave, whether it's the | :55:08. | :55:11. | |
process, we've got to tackle it because we can't just dismiss this | :55:12. | :55:15. | |
and I think whatever the solutions, and I can't come out with them | :55:16. | :55:19. | |
tonight, whatever the solutions, we have to take it seriously, all | :55:20. | :55:24. | |
parties, because I've never known this disconnect be so bad. The man | :55:25. | :55:28. | |
in suspecticals? Do you think we have got a problem when the Prime | :55:29. | :55:33. | |
Minister can guess the price of a loaf of bread and get it 50% wrong | :55:34. | :55:39. | |
and Boris can guess the price of a pint of milk and also get it 50% | :55:40. | :55:48. | |
wrong? I think being very actively involved in politics whether you | :55:49. | :55:51. | |
have elected or the fantastic people in the constituencies that go out at | :55:52. | :55:56. | |
weekends and give up their evenings and so on, that is not the norm so | :55:57. | :56:00. | |
perhaps that is a bit weird but I also think people have a different | :56:01. | :56:04. | |
view of politicians as a group than their own elective councillor in | :56:05. | :56:07. | |
their community or their own Member of Parliament. I'll often have | :56:08. | :56:11. | |
people explain their frustration to me when I'm out knocking on doors or | :56:12. | :56:21. | |
in my constituency, and they'll say, I don't mean you. So there is a | :56:22. | :56:24. | |
disconnect about people's experiences. Given some of the | :56:25. | :56:28. | |
comments from the local members, that might not be the right | :56:29. | :56:33. | |
audience, but people sometimes have an appreciation if their local | :56:34. | :56:37. | |
councillors and local Members of Parliament that they have been | :56:38. | :56:40. | |
helped and don't necessarily think the same. Peter Hitchens? Some are | :56:41. | :56:47. | |
all right, most are pretty much like us and that's the problem. Alan goes | :56:48. | :56:53. | |
on about being elected. You don't get elected, but you get selected by | :56:54. | :56:58. | |
the parties, and you can't get selected unless you accept studenth | :56:59. | :57:04. | |
stupid discredited ideas on which have been exploding which they'll | :57:05. | :57:08. | |
not give up. That is the real reason for the disconnect between them and | :57:09. | :57:12. | |
us, they are still thinking in categories and ideas discredited | :57:13. | :57:15. | |
many years ago and you can't get into the magic circle unless you | :57:16. | :57:18. | |
accept that. Until that changes and the three parties are ejected from | :57:19. | :57:23. | |
Westminster and replaced with ones which truly represent what we are | :57:24. | :57:32. | |
worried about... But you Your party would never select me, his party | :57:33. | :57:42. | |
would never select me. Do you not see how Parliamentary elections | :57:43. | :57:46. | |
work? You voted for those put before you by the major parties. If anybody | :57:47. | :57:53. | |
outside that point stands... It's exactly the point at which people | :57:54. | :58:01. | |
get into politics. How did Caroline Lucas get elected? It's Brighton. | :58:02. | :58:07. | |
The hour is over, next week will be the last Question Time until the | :58:08. | :58:11. | |
autumn and we'll be in Inverness and will have no politicians on the | :58:12. | :58:14. | |
panel for a change. It will be made up of musicians, businessmen, | :58:15. | :58:18. | |
journalists, and we are going to be back on the 25th September, that's | :58:19. | :58:22. | |
after the Scottish independence vote and we are going to have the | :58:23. | :58:26. | |
programme from Kelso which is close to the English border and what we | :58:27. | :58:30. | |
are looking for on the 25th September is an audience made up in | :58:31. | :58:33. | |
part from people from England, in part from people in Scotland, | :58:34. | :58:37. | |
clearly to debate the result of that referendum and, of course, whatever | :58:38. | :58:42. | |
else is in the news. If you want to come to Either programme, go to the | :58:43. | :58:48. | |
website. The address is on the screen. Or you can call us. If you | :58:49. | :58:56. | |
are listening on Five Live, the debate goes on on Question Time | :58:57. | :59:02. | |
Extra Time. My job is to thank the panel and all of you who came here | :59:03. | :59:08. | |
to take part. From next week, when we'll be in Scotland, good night. | :59:09. | :59:10. |