Browse content similar to 18/02/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Here we are in Stratford-upon-Avon, and this is Question Time. | 0:00:02 | 0:00:05 | |
And a big welcome to our audience, to all of you watching or | 0:00:12 | 0:00:15 | |
listening on the radio, and of course to our panel. | 0:00:15 | 0:00:19 | |
Tonight, the Conservative International Development Secretary | 0:00:19 | 0:00:23 | |
Justine Greening, Labour's Shadow Energy Secretary Lisa Nandy, | 0:00:23 | 0:00:27 | |
the SNP MP and culture spokesman John Nicolson, | 0:00:27 | 0:00:31 | |
the broadcaster June Sarpong, | 0:00:31 | 0:00:34 | |
and the businessman and former star of Dragons' Den Theo Paphitis. | 0:00:34 | 0:00:39 | |
As I always say, you can join in this debate from home. | 0:00:56 | 0:00:59 | |
You can do it on Facebook, on Twitter - #bbcqt, | 0:00:59 | 0:01:04 | |
you can follow us @BBCQuestionTime. | 0:01:04 | 0:01:06 | |
You can text comments... | 0:01:06 | 0:01:08 | |
All the details are on the screen. | 0:01:08 | 0:01:09 | |
And push the red button and see what others are saying. | 0:01:09 | 0:01:13 | |
But let's take our first question from Christopher Walsh, please. | 0:01:13 | 0:01:16 | |
Has David Cameron really done enough to persuade the British public | 0:01:17 | 0:01:21 | |
that we should remain in the European Union? | 0:01:21 | 0:01:24 | |
-This is assuming he gets everything he has been asking for, yes? -Yes. | 0:01:24 | 0:01:28 | |
Yes. Theo Paphitis. | 0:01:28 | 0:01:30 | |
If he wins all his points, has he done enough? | 0:01:31 | 0:01:34 | |
Well, so far, what I've seen from both sides is Project Fear. | 0:01:34 | 0:01:38 | |
From my perspective, I am not really sure where I am | 0:01:38 | 0:01:40 | |
at the moment. I'm sort of reasonably well-read, | 0:01:40 | 0:01:44 | |
I have unprecedented access to people in the know, | 0:01:44 | 0:01:48 | |
I am in business | 0:01:48 | 0:01:50 | |
and at the moment, I just have not got a Scooby-Doo which side | 0:01:50 | 0:01:53 | |
to go on. | 0:01:53 | 0:01:55 | |
Certainly, so far, it just seems - I hate to say this - | 0:01:55 | 0:01:59 | |
but like a big pantomime. | 0:01:59 | 0:02:01 | |
When will we be told facts? | 0:02:09 | 0:02:13 | |
Not scaremongering that the world is flat | 0:02:13 | 0:02:15 | |
and if we leave the EU we're going to fall off the edge, you know, | 0:02:15 | 0:02:19 | |
which are the sort of things we are hearing. | 0:02:19 | 0:02:22 | |
Or, in fact, Brexit is the best thing since sliced bread | 0:02:22 | 0:02:27 | |
and we're going to be ever so rich if we leave tomorrow morning | 0:02:27 | 0:02:30 | |
and it will be so much easier. The sun's going to come out | 0:02:30 | 0:02:33 | |
and we will all be looking great and feeling happy. | 0:02:33 | 0:02:36 | |
There's been no facts, just scaremongering from both sides. | 0:02:36 | 0:02:39 | |
But you are a successful businessman, | 0:02:39 | 0:02:42 | |
apart from your Dragons' Den life. | 0:02:42 | 0:02:44 | |
-That wasn't that bad! -LAUGHTER | 0:02:44 | 0:02:46 | |
Surely you have a considered view about in Europe or out, | 0:02:46 | 0:02:50 | |
as a businessman? | 0:02:50 | 0:02:51 | |
I have a view, but it is not a view that I am prepared, at the moment, | 0:02:51 | 0:02:57 | |
to put a cross on the ballot box to say, "We are off," | 0:02:57 | 0:03:02 | |
or, "We are staying," | 0:03:02 | 0:03:03 | |
because there's just not enough facts coming out. | 0:03:03 | 0:03:06 | |
As for this renegotiation, I don't know if it is just me but I am | 0:03:06 | 0:03:12 | |
struggling to see why it makes any difference to why | 0:03:12 | 0:03:16 | |
-we are in or we are out. -Right... | 0:03:16 | 0:03:18 | |
So, Justine Greening, it's a pantomime, | 0:03:22 | 0:03:26 | |
Theo says, what is going on in Brussels tonight and tomorrow. | 0:03:26 | 0:03:29 | |
I don't think it is at all. | 0:03:29 | 0:03:32 | |
I think the Prime Minister is trying to get the best possible | 0:03:32 | 0:03:34 | |
deal for our country, which is what he should be doing. | 0:03:34 | 0:03:37 | |
It's potentially a deal that can see us | 0:03:37 | 0:03:40 | |
have a much better place within Europe. | 0:03:40 | 0:03:43 | |
And indeed, what's interesting, some of the debate tonight | 0:03:43 | 0:03:46 | |
is going to be from other countries, leaders around the table | 0:03:46 | 0:03:49 | |
who want some of the things that | 0:03:49 | 0:03:50 | |
Cameron is managing to negotiate for Britain. | 0:03:50 | 0:03:53 | |
But at the end of the day, I think | 0:03:53 | 0:03:55 | |
it is going to be about what is in Britain's interests - | 0:03:55 | 0:03:58 | |
how do we want to stay influential in Europe, | 0:03:58 | 0:04:01 | |
what is the right future for us? | 0:04:01 | 0:04:03 | |
And it's going to be up to everybody in this room, | 0:04:03 | 0:04:05 | |
the whole of the British people, to have their say. | 0:04:05 | 0:04:08 | |
As you say, I don't think we have really got into the debate yet, | 0:04:08 | 0:04:12 | |
but it has to be about what we want as well as what people don't want. | 0:04:12 | 0:04:15 | |
And you are right to say we must make sure it is not simply | 0:04:15 | 0:04:18 | |
some kind of Project Fear, where both sides set out the risks. | 0:04:18 | 0:04:21 | |
I think there is no black-and-white solution. | 0:04:21 | 0:04:24 | |
There's going to be pros and cons whichever side people go, | 0:04:24 | 0:04:27 | |
whichever way our country goes. | 0:04:27 | 0:04:29 | |
But the bottom line is we are all going to have to make our own | 0:04:29 | 0:04:32 | |
minds up, and hopefully this time tomorrow | 0:04:32 | 0:04:34 | |
we might have a clear idea what | 0:04:34 | 0:04:37 | |
Britain's deal is that the Prime Minister has managed to get. | 0:04:37 | 0:04:39 | |
The question that Christopher Walsh asked was, even if | 0:04:39 | 0:04:43 | |
he got all the things he is saying he wants to get, would that | 0:04:43 | 0:04:48 | |
be enough to persuade you, for instance, to remain in the EU? | 0:04:48 | 0:04:53 | |
I've said I think it's the basis for a good deal | 0:04:53 | 0:04:56 | |
and if we can get it I would prefer it if we could stay in. | 0:04:56 | 0:04:59 | |
I think, in the end, | 0:04:59 | 0:05:00 | |
for me, it is about interest and influence - | 0:05:00 | 0:05:03 | |
interest in terms of jobs | 0:05:03 | 0:05:04 | |
and influence in the sense that the discussions and decisions | 0:05:04 | 0:05:08 | |
that happen at EU level do impact us whether we like it or not, | 0:05:08 | 0:05:11 | |
and I would prefer to stay around that table being able to | 0:05:11 | 0:05:15 | |
-have our say and stand up for our country. -OK. | 0:05:15 | 0:05:18 | |
It will be really interesting to hear what you all have to say. | 0:05:21 | 0:05:24 | |
I'll just take one more member of the panel | 0:05:24 | 0:05:26 | |
and then we will come back. Let's hear Lisa Nandy's view of this. | 0:05:26 | 0:05:30 | |
I think he will come back with some kind of deal. | 0:05:30 | 0:05:33 | |
I don't think it will do enough to convince | 0:05:33 | 0:05:35 | |
the Euro-sceptics in his own party, | 0:05:35 | 0:05:37 | |
I don't think anything could do that. | 0:05:37 | 0:05:39 | |
But my concern is that it won't do enough to convince | 0:05:39 | 0:05:42 | |
people in the country who are particularly concerned about jobs. | 0:05:42 | 0:05:46 | |
The Europe that they need to see is the Europe that has delivered | 0:05:46 | 0:05:49 | |
us many of those workplace rights, a Europe where our Prime Minister is | 0:05:49 | 0:05:54 | |
pushing to make sure that employers can't undercut wages using | 0:05:54 | 0:05:59 | |
cheap labour, | 0:05:59 | 0:06:01 | |
a Europe where we work together, collaboratively, to stop | 0:06:01 | 0:06:04 | |
companies like Google playing us off against one another and avoiding | 0:06:04 | 0:06:09 | |
paying their fair share of taxes, | 0:06:09 | 0:06:11 | |
and a Europe in the end where we work | 0:06:11 | 0:06:14 | |
together in our shared interests to | 0:06:14 | 0:06:16 | |
tackle the big challenges that we face. | 0:06:16 | 0:06:18 | |
Because whether it's climate change | 0:06:18 | 0:06:20 | |
or mass movement of refugees or international terrorism, | 0:06:20 | 0:06:25 | |
these are all things that demand more cooperation from us, not less. | 0:06:25 | 0:06:30 | |
What about the things being negotiated, which Theo | 0:06:30 | 0:06:33 | |
described as pantomime? Do you think it's pantomime, what we're seeing? | 0:06:33 | 0:06:36 | |
I would describe it as tinkering, when we need a Prime Minister who | 0:06:36 | 0:06:41 | |
is going to fight for a Europe that works for people | 0:06:41 | 0:06:45 | |
and not a Europe that works for big business. | 0:06:45 | 0:06:47 | |
Jeremy Corbyn, that would be? | 0:06:47 | 0:06:49 | |
That's the Europe that would stand up for Britain's interests | 0:06:49 | 0:06:52 | |
and give us influence in the coming centuries. | 0:06:52 | 0:06:54 | |
And that's Jeremy Corbyn? | 0:06:54 | 0:06:56 | |
That is exactly what Jeremy Corbyn was arguing for in Brussels today. | 0:06:56 | 0:07:00 | |
OK. You, sir, at the back, in the blue shirt. | 0:07:00 | 0:07:02 | |
I think we should have a Prime Minister | 0:07:02 | 0:07:05 | |
that fights for the UK, not Europe. | 0:07:05 | 0:07:07 | |
Do you think David Cameron is fighting for the UK? | 0:07:07 | 0:07:11 | |
I don't know. | 0:07:11 | 0:07:13 | |
I'm sitting on the fence with Theo. We just don't know. | 0:07:13 | 0:07:16 | |
You... The lady here in the front. | 0:07:16 | 0:07:19 | |
What makes anybody think it's going to be any different? | 0:07:19 | 0:07:22 | |
Our country's infrastructure cannot cope with any more mass migration. | 0:07:22 | 0:07:26 | |
If Turkey joined the EU, no matter what David Cameron gets us now, | 0:07:26 | 0:07:29 | |
it's not going to be enough. | 0:07:29 | 0:07:32 | |
-So will you vote out? -Out. Definitely out. | 0:07:32 | 0:07:34 | |
You're a definite out. June Sarpong, what are you? | 0:07:34 | 0:07:37 | |
Well, I am definitely in, I am part of the campaign to try | 0:07:37 | 0:07:40 | |
and keep us in. | 0:07:40 | 0:07:42 | |
I come at this from a different perspective, I am not a politician | 0:07:42 | 0:07:45 | |
and I don't run a big business, like Theo. | 0:07:45 | 0:07:47 | |
-It's not all that bad! -I wish I did, but I don't. | 0:07:47 | 0:07:50 | |
But...I care about the future | 0:07:50 | 0:07:53 | |
and I don't want to live in the past. | 0:07:53 | 0:07:55 | |
And I think Britain is stronger in Europe for three reasons. | 0:07:55 | 0:07:57 | |
The first reason is economically - we will be poorer | 0:07:57 | 0:08:00 | |
if we leave Europe. We will, | 0:08:00 | 0:08:02 | |
because three million British jobs are linked | 0:08:02 | 0:08:05 | |
to those we trade with in the EU. | 0:08:05 | 0:08:06 | |
-APPLAUSE AND DISSENT -Yes, they are! Yes, they are. | 0:08:06 | 0:08:10 | |
So therefore if we leave, we could be putting those jobs at risk. | 0:08:10 | 0:08:13 | |
-That's not Project Fear, that's Project Truth. -Can you justify that? | 0:08:13 | 0:08:17 | |
-Yes. -Come on, I'm listening. -Yes... -I'm here to be convinced. | 0:08:17 | 0:08:20 | |
Those are government statistics, not mine. | 0:08:20 | 0:08:23 | |
-No, they're not... -I didn't make them up. -They're not. | 0:08:23 | 0:08:25 | |
I'm here to be convinced. | 0:08:25 | 0:08:27 | |
-Who has come up with three million job losses? -The government. | 0:08:27 | 0:08:30 | |
-They haven't. -They didn't say three million job losses, | 0:08:30 | 0:08:32 | |
they've said that three million jobs are linked to our trade | 0:08:32 | 0:08:35 | |
with other EU countries. | 0:08:35 | 0:08:36 | |
And five million jobs are linked... | 0:08:36 | 0:08:39 | |
Five million jobs in the EU are linked directly with the UK economy. | 0:08:39 | 0:08:44 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:08:45 | 0:08:46 | |
Fact. | 0:08:46 | 0:08:48 | |
-And where did you get that statistic from? -Where does that get you? | 0:08:48 | 0:08:51 | |
Where does that come from? | 0:08:51 | 0:08:53 | |
No, where does that get you? | 0:08:53 | 0:08:55 | |
Basically, we need each other. | 0:08:55 | 0:08:57 | |
It is not a case of if we leave, they're going to... | 0:08:57 | 0:09:00 | |
They're going to flood the Channel Tunnel and say, | 0:09:00 | 0:09:03 | |
"You can't deal with us any more." | 0:09:03 | 0:09:05 | |
-They need us more than we need them. -No, they don't. | 0:09:05 | 0:09:09 | |
Why would we want to leave a leadership position | 0:09:09 | 0:09:14 | |
in the biggest trading bloc in the world? Why would we do that? | 0:09:14 | 0:09:18 | |
Why would we want to limit the chances for our younger generation? | 0:09:18 | 0:09:21 | |
The biggest trading bloc in the world? | 0:09:21 | 0:09:22 | |
Have you seen the decline of the EU GDP figures? | 0:09:22 | 0:09:25 | |
Still 50% of our foreign direct investment comes from Europe, Theo. | 0:09:25 | 0:09:30 | |
You've got to realise... | 0:09:30 | 0:09:32 | |
You are a businessman, Theo... | 0:09:32 | 0:09:34 | |
-A very good businessman... -And I know the true figures. | 0:09:34 | 0:09:37 | |
The fact remains, the EU is the only trading bloc that is declining | 0:09:37 | 0:09:40 | |
while the rest of the world is actually growing. | 0:09:40 | 0:09:43 | |
But while it still accounts | 0:09:43 | 0:09:46 | |
for half of our trading, it makes sense for us to stay there. | 0:09:46 | 0:09:51 | |
-John Nicolson. -I feel a bit rude interrupting. -Sorry, John! | 0:09:51 | 0:09:55 | |
Look, we should be clear about what we are getting | 0:09:55 | 0:09:58 | |
and what we are not getting. We are not getting a treaty change. | 0:09:58 | 0:10:01 | |
So anything the Prime Minister comes back with can be | 0:10:01 | 0:10:05 | |
rejected by the European Parliament, so we can go into this referendum | 0:10:05 | 0:10:10 | |
and vote on something which the European Parliament can then reject. | 0:10:10 | 0:10:13 | |
It is important to recognise that. | 0:10:13 | 0:10:15 | |
Can the Council of Ministers not override the European Parliament? | 0:10:15 | 0:10:19 | |
-Possibly. -More likely than not, I think. | 0:10:19 | 0:10:22 | |
But still, we are voting for something | 0:10:22 | 0:10:24 | |
which could then change subsequently. | 0:10:24 | 0:10:27 | |
We are also voting for something that could be | 0:10:27 | 0:10:31 | |
overturned in the European courts. | 0:10:31 | 0:10:34 | |
There could, for example, be a challenge. | 0:10:34 | 0:10:37 | |
So it's all very vague, and the reason it is very vague is because, | 0:10:37 | 0:10:41 | |
I agree, it is a pantomime. | 0:10:41 | 0:10:43 | |
It is about internal Conservative Party politics | 0:10:43 | 0:10:46 | |
rather than really changing Europe. | 0:10:46 | 0:10:50 | |
But nevertheless, you will vote on it. | 0:10:50 | 0:10:52 | |
I will vote, I will vote and I will vote to stay, | 0:10:52 | 0:10:56 | |
because I think we are getting terribly | 0:10:56 | 0:10:59 | |
absorbed in a lot of the minutiae of this rather than the big picture. | 0:10:59 | 0:11:04 | |
Last week, I was in Berlin, | 0:11:04 | 0:11:06 | |
and I think what Parliament really misses is the statesmen. | 0:11:06 | 0:11:11 | |
It's the elder statesmen, it's the Ted Heaths, Denis Healeys, | 0:11:11 | 0:11:16 | |
it's the Jacques Chiracs, people who | 0:11:16 | 0:11:18 | |
have a memory of war and remember what this whole project was about. | 0:11:18 | 0:11:23 | |
It was about peace in Europe, the iron and steel community, | 0:11:23 | 0:11:27 | |
growing peace in Europe and stability | 0:11:27 | 0:11:30 | |
between these warring factions. | 0:11:30 | 0:11:32 | |
And what's been achieved in Europe is an extraordinary thing. | 0:11:32 | 0:11:35 | |
And can I just make one point, David? | 0:11:35 | 0:11:38 | |
Which is about something, if you remember, called subsidiarity. | 0:11:38 | 0:11:42 | |
Do you remember that word? | 0:11:42 | 0:11:43 | |
Because the Prime Minister says he is in Brussels at the moment | 0:11:43 | 0:11:47 | |
and one of the things he is trying to stop is Britain being | 0:11:47 | 0:11:50 | |
sucked deeper into European integration. | 0:11:50 | 0:11:53 | |
John Major tried to do that, | 0:11:53 | 0:11:55 | |
and he tried to do that in a way which has hoisted the Tories | 0:11:55 | 0:11:58 | |
with their own Europe petard, because he broadened Europe. | 0:11:58 | 0:12:02 | |
He was keen for Romania to come in, and Bulgaria... | 0:12:02 | 0:12:05 | |
And what was the inevitable consequence of that? | 0:12:05 | 0:12:08 | |
A huge amount of immigration. | 0:12:08 | 0:12:10 | |
And you're not in favour of those countries being in the EU? | 0:12:10 | 0:12:13 | |
I am in favour of those countries... | 0:12:13 | 0:12:15 | |
Why do you criticise him for allowing it? | 0:12:15 | 0:12:17 | |
Because he's so clearly not achieved what he set out to achieve. | 0:12:17 | 0:12:20 | |
I'm completely consistent... | 0:12:20 | 0:12:22 | |
Turkey would like to be a member as well. From your point of view...? | 0:12:22 | 0:12:25 | |
Turkey's...more complicated. | 0:12:25 | 0:12:28 | |
I'm not sure about Turkey. | 0:12:28 | 0:12:31 | |
I wouldn't necessarily reject Turkey coming in, | 0:12:31 | 0:12:34 | |
but when you think of what the European Union did in giving | 0:12:34 | 0:12:38 | |
hope to the ex-communist countries, | 0:12:38 | 0:12:40 | |
integrating the ex-fascist countries, | 0:12:40 | 0:12:43 | |
it's been an extraordinary success. | 0:12:43 | 0:12:45 | |
OK, let's go back to the question about Cameron... | 0:12:45 | 0:12:48 | |
and the negotiations and | 0:12:48 | 0:12:50 | |
whether the negotiations, which were described | 0:12:50 | 0:12:52 | |
at the beginning as a pantomime, whether they are enough to | 0:12:52 | 0:12:55 | |
persuade people. You, sir. | 0:12:55 | 0:12:57 | |
Yes, it is all smoke and mirrors | 0:12:57 | 0:12:59 | |
and he has no chance of delivering anything. | 0:12:59 | 0:13:02 | |
It's jam tomorrow. | 0:13:02 | 0:13:04 | |
We have to get control back of our borders. | 0:13:04 | 0:13:07 | |
As far as the comment you made about business, | 0:13:07 | 0:13:10 | |
the trade deficit with Europe - our deficit is 88 billion. | 0:13:10 | 0:13:14 | |
Do you think Europe will stop doing business with us? | 0:13:14 | 0:13:17 | |
And you, sir, let's have a wide range of views from an | 0:13:17 | 0:13:20 | |
audience of mixed opinion, yes... | 0:13:20 | 0:13:22 | |
With regards to the question of is David Cameron going to get | 0:13:22 | 0:13:25 | |
a deal, absolutely he will, but will it be in Britain's best interest? | 0:13:25 | 0:13:29 | |
Probably not. | 0:13:29 | 0:13:31 | |
It will be another David Cameron manifesto | 0:13:31 | 0:13:34 | |
full of "no ifs, no buts", promises that he will not | 0:13:34 | 0:13:36 | |
deliver on. | 0:13:36 | 0:13:38 | |
-Are you voting yes or no? -Absolutely no. | 0:13:38 | 0:13:40 | |
Regardless of what he does? | 0:13:40 | 0:13:42 | |
-Absolutely. -OK. Anybody want to vote yes, regardless of what happens? | 0:13:42 | 0:13:45 | |
You, sir, in the pink there. | 0:13:45 | 0:13:47 | |
Isn't the bottom line here sovereignty | 0:13:47 | 0:13:50 | |
and the UK being in control of its own destiny? | 0:13:50 | 0:13:53 | |
-JUNE: -And currency as well. | 0:13:53 | 0:13:55 | |
The man there in the turquoise shirt, the short-sleeved shirt on... | 0:13:56 | 0:14:02 | |
If that identifies you. | 0:14:02 | 0:14:03 | |
The Prime Minister gave an interview today where he said | 0:14:03 | 0:14:06 | |
he was battling for Britain. | 0:14:06 | 0:14:09 | |
By the weekend, we might find out that he's buckled for Britain. | 0:14:09 | 0:14:13 | |
Yes, you, sir, in the middle there. | 0:14:13 | 0:14:16 | |
Just to take the gentleman on the left there - his point... | 0:14:16 | 0:14:19 | |
He said that Europe was established to stop war. | 0:14:19 | 0:14:23 | |
It wasn't. It was established as a European free-trade association. | 0:14:23 | 0:14:28 | |
And that's what we voted for! | 0:14:28 | 0:14:30 | |
If I may, you said you were in Berlin. | 0:14:30 | 0:14:36 | |
I think people in Berlin, at least their leader, needs reminding, | 0:14:36 | 0:14:40 | |
when she keeps telling this about preventing war, | 0:14:40 | 0:14:44 | |
their country started the last two wars. | 0:14:44 | 0:14:47 | |
DISQUIET | 0:14:47 | 0:14:48 | |
Lisa Nandy. | 0:14:48 | 0:14:49 | |
I would just say to the gentleman there, | 0:14:49 | 0:14:51 | |
I really do disagree with you. | 0:14:51 | 0:14:53 | |
The EU was established to make war not only unthinkable | 0:14:53 | 0:14:56 | |
but materially impossible. | 0:14:56 | 0:14:58 | |
I think that on that basis it has been a success. | 0:14:58 | 0:15:01 | |
It hasn't done that, we've had... | 0:15:01 | 0:15:03 | |
I wanted to take on this point that a number of people have | 0:15:03 | 0:15:05 | |
mentioned about sovereignty. | 0:15:05 | 0:15:07 | |
It's absolutely right to recognise that we need more democratic control | 0:15:07 | 0:15:11 | |
within the EU. | 0:15:11 | 0:15:13 | |
But surely nobody would think, in today's world, that we | 0:15:13 | 0:15:16 | |
will have more control over the major issues that affect us, | 0:15:16 | 0:15:20 | |
like trade and jobs, like climate change, | 0:15:20 | 0:15:23 | |
like international terrorism, by turning our back on the EU? | 0:15:23 | 0:15:27 | |
We need more cooperation | 0:15:27 | 0:15:28 | |
and need to be right at the heart of Europe | 0:15:28 | 0:15:30 | |
so that we make sure that Britain is shaping | 0:15:30 | 0:15:33 | |
the nature of that cooperation and not being dragged into it... | 0:15:33 | 0:15:36 | |
-They don't listen to us... -..on someone else's terms. | 0:15:36 | 0:15:39 | |
Justine Greening. | 0:15:39 | 0:15:40 | |
Firstly, the Prime Minister has been very clear | 0:15:43 | 0:15:46 | |
he wants to get a good deal, but if he can't get one today, | 0:15:46 | 0:15:49 | |
tonight, he won't accept a deal | 0:15:49 | 0:15:51 | |
that is not good enough for our country. | 0:15:51 | 0:15:53 | |
The second thing is, we do need to look at what Europe needs to | 0:15:53 | 0:15:56 | |
be for the future, rather than just looking at the past. | 0:15:56 | 0:15:59 | |
There is no doubt that in my area in international development | 0:15:59 | 0:16:02 | |
we have done huge amounts of work in Syria, but we have seen | 0:16:02 | 0:16:05 | |
the impact of that much closer to home here in Europe, | 0:16:05 | 0:16:08 | |
and it makes sense for us | 0:16:08 | 0:16:10 | |
to try and work in partnership with other countries in Europe on that. | 0:16:10 | 0:16:13 | |
But the bottom line is this - we have had Question Times over | 0:16:13 | 0:16:16 | |
the years, we have had debates over the years. | 0:16:16 | 0:16:19 | |
What is different now is you are all going to get, | 0:16:19 | 0:16:22 | |
we're all going to get to have our say, for the first time ever. | 0:16:22 | 0:16:25 | |
So whether or not you think the PM's going to get | 0:16:25 | 0:16:28 | |
a good deal, whether or not you think he is, | 0:16:28 | 0:16:31 | |
the bottom line is we get to decide as a country, | 0:16:31 | 0:16:34 | |
and surely that is something we should be able to agree on? | 0:16:34 | 0:16:36 | |
It's a massive step forward and it is the right thing that | 0:16:36 | 0:16:39 | |
after all these years | 0:16:39 | 0:16:40 | |
people here in our country get to have their say. | 0:16:40 | 0:16:43 | |
OK. Just before we go on... | 0:16:43 | 0:16:46 | |
We heard a number of voices on the out side. | 0:16:46 | 0:16:50 | |
I want to hear from people who would like to remain. | 0:16:50 | 0:16:53 | |
Just a couple of people who would... You, sir, yes. | 0:16:53 | 0:16:57 | |
Britain is not a beggar, you know. | 0:16:57 | 0:17:00 | |
The Prime Minister should stick on his points | 0:17:00 | 0:17:03 | |
and whatever he wants - he can have that from the European Union. | 0:17:03 | 0:17:08 | |
So he should stick, for the Britain, | 0:17:08 | 0:17:11 | |
for Westminster, to make it safe for our children in future. | 0:17:11 | 0:17:16 | |
OK. And you, sir... On the right. Yes. | 0:17:16 | 0:17:19 | |
I think... A lot of attacks have been made against David Cameron | 0:17:19 | 0:17:22 | |
but in my lifetime it's the first | 0:17:22 | 0:17:24 | |
time I have seen a British Prime Minister | 0:17:24 | 0:17:26 | |
stand up to Europe and challenge them on their principles. | 0:17:26 | 0:17:29 | |
We can argue whether these are long-term changes | 0:17:29 | 0:17:32 | |
but the process of negotiation has begun and I am voting in | 0:17:32 | 0:17:35 | |
because I believe that once this first change is made, | 0:17:35 | 0:17:39 | |
hopefully other European leaders will be brave enough to stand up | 0:17:39 | 0:17:42 | |
and make more reforms in Europe. | 0:17:42 | 0:17:44 | |
And you on the gangway there. | 0:17:46 | 0:17:49 | |
Lisa Nandy is right, how can we ever be able to trade with the EU | 0:17:49 | 0:17:54 | |
if we can't be part of it | 0:17:54 | 0:17:56 | |
and we can't be the big player which affects it from the middle? | 0:17:56 | 0:18:01 | |
Why would we want to go out and lose that power? | 0:18:01 | 0:18:05 | |
Is that regardless of what Cameron comes back from Brussels with? | 0:18:05 | 0:18:10 | |
-Yeah, because... -It doesn't affect you one way or the other? | 0:18:10 | 0:18:13 | |
It does affect it, but if we go out of Europe we won't have that say. | 0:18:13 | 0:18:17 | |
If you had just had a referendum... | 0:18:17 | 0:18:19 | |
Cameron just saying, | 0:18:19 | 0:18:20 | |
"We'll have a referendum without any renegotiation. | 0:18:20 | 0:18:24 | |
"Just want to know, cos we haven't asked you since 1975..." | 0:18:24 | 0:18:26 | |
Well, you weren't born in 1975... LAUGHTER | 0:18:26 | 0:18:29 | |
"We haven't asked you, we are just going to ask you again, | 0:18:29 | 0:18:32 | |
"without any attempt at changing anything." | 0:18:32 | 0:18:35 | |
-Would you have still voted in? -Yeah. -Yeah. OK. | 0:18:35 | 0:18:37 | |
We will have more of this as the weeks pass, I've no doubt, | 0:18:37 | 0:18:41 | |
but let's just take this as a coda to it, | 0:18:41 | 0:18:43 | |
from Andy Chilton, please. Slightly off-beam and quickly, I think. Yes. | 0:18:43 | 0:18:47 | |
Was actress Emma Thompson's description of Britain | 0:18:47 | 0:18:50 | |
as a "cake-filled, misery-laden, grey old island" | 0:18:50 | 0:18:53 | |
a fair reflection of | 0:18:53 | 0:18:55 | |
our country or just another example of metropolitan elitist snobbery? | 0:18:55 | 0:18:59 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:18:59 | 0:19:01 | |
She said she felt European even though she lived in Great Britain. | 0:19:06 | 0:19:09 | |
"I'm living in Europe. Of course I am, as it were... | 0:19:09 | 0:19:12 | |
"A tiny little cloud-bolted, rainy corner of sort-of Europe." | 0:19:12 | 0:19:15 | |
-Erm, is that how you see Europe, June? -No. | 0:19:15 | 0:19:20 | |
-I mean Britain. -No, not at all, | 0:19:20 | 0:19:22 | |
I see Britain as a fantastic Victoria sponge. | 0:19:22 | 0:19:25 | |
I have to say, the one thing that I am slightly anti-EU on, | 0:19:25 | 0:19:30 | |
being a pro-EU campaigner, | 0:19:30 | 0:19:33 | |
is I see far too many French tarts in our bakeries! | 0:19:33 | 0:19:37 | |
-SHE LAUGHS -Or Tatins! | 0:19:37 | 0:19:40 | |
So rather than Emma's description, I would say I think we are a fantastic | 0:19:40 | 0:19:44 | |
Victoria sponge and I completely disagree with her on that one. | 0:19:44 | 0:19:47 | |
OK. Theo. | 0:19:47 | 0:19:48 | |
I don't actually recognise that description of the United Kingdom. | 0:19:49 | 0:19:53 | |
We've got our problems. | 0:19:53 | 0:19:55 | |
We have got our down sides, we've got the odd bit of rain, | 0:19:55 | 0:19:58 | |
-but at the end of the day... -"Misery-laden, grey"? | 0:19:58 | 0:20:01 | |
No, I think she's been in LA for too long. | 0:20:01 | 0:20:03 | |
That's her problem. | 0:20:03 | 0:20:04 | |
All right. Lisa? | 0:20:04 | 0:20:07 | |
We have our fair share of rain in the Northwest, I can tell you that. | 0:20:07 | 0:20:10 | |
But I don't recognise that description of Britain. | 0:20:10 | 0:20:13 | |
I much prefer the celebration of Britain that we saw | 0:20:13 | 0:20:16 | |
Danny Boyle put on during the Olympics opening ceremony - | 0:20:16 | 0:20:19 | |
a Britain that has worked over the centuries to strive, | 0:20:19 | 0:20:23 | |
to work together and stick up for people | 0:20:23 | 0:20:26 | |
and to defend values of social justice around the world. | 0:20:26 | 0:20:29 | |
That's why I want to see us stay in the EU, | 0:20:29 | 0:20:31 | |
cos I want to see us not just have global influence | 0:20:31 | 0:20:34 | |
in past centuries but in the coming centuries as well. | 0:20:34 | 0:20:37 | |
OK. | 0:20:37 | 0:20:38 | |
Poor old Emma Thompson, anyone want to come to her defence? | 0:20:41 | 0:20:44 | |
-No. -Nobody. | 0:20:44 | 0:20:46 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:20:46 | 0:20:47 | |
-I want to. -As a Scot... -I want to come to her defence. | 0:20:47 | 0:20:51 | |
Her politics isn't great, that said. | 0:20:51 | 0:20:54 | |
I notice that she said she had lived in Great Britain and Scotland. | 0:20:54 | 0:20:58 | |
-Er... -LAUGHTER | 0:20:58 | 0:21:00 | |
Maybe she knows something about the next referendum that I don't! | 0:21:00 | 0:21:05 | |
Look, one of the problems, I think, for people like Emma is that | 0:21:05 | 0:21:08 | |
she's in the public eye. And she sometimes says things, | 0:21:08 | 0:21:12 | |
and then you have all these very po-faced journalists, | 0:21:12 | 0:21:15 | |
of which I used to be one, who then listen to what she says, | 0:21:15 | 0:21:19 | |
make it into a big banner headline | 0:21:19 | 0:21:21 | |
and blow it up out of all proportion. | 0:21:21 | 0:21:23 | |
I suspect she probably regrets saying it. | 0:21:23 | 0:21:25 | |
Is it the worst thing she could say? | 0:21:25 | 0:21:28 | |
I doubt it. She seems very English to me. Proud of being English. | 0:21:28 | 0:21:31 | |
I wish she would lead a campaign... | 0:21:31 | 0:21:34 | |
Actually, since we are talking about cake names - | 0:21:34 | 0:21:37 | |
to revert from "cupcakes" to good old-fashioned "fairy cakes". | 0:21:37 | 0:21:40 | |
-Oh, yeah! -OK. | 0:21:40 | 0:21:42 | |
-What is wrong with a fairy? -What is wrong with a fairy cake? | 0:21:42 | 0:21:45 | |
This is getting wildly out of hand! | 0:21:45 | 0:21:47 | |
Justine Greening, you are International Development Secretary, | 0:21:47 | 0:21:50 | |
you go around the world and hear people talking about Great Britain. | 0:21:50 | 0:21:53 | |
Do they think about Great Britain that it's a "tiny little | 0:21:53 | 0:21:56 | |
"cloud-bolted rainy corner of sort-of Europe"? | 0:21:56 | 0:21:58 | |
I think they all know it rains in Britain quite a lot. | 0:21:58 | 0:22:01 | |
But in the end, I think most people recognise that it's a unique | 0:22:01 | 0:22:04 | |
country with an amazing history. | 0:22:04 | 0:22:06 | |
We do some of the best comedy in the world | 0:22:06 | 0:22:09 | |
and we should be really proud of that. | 0:22:09 | 0:22:12 | |
I don't know - maybe Emma was having a bad day. | 0:22:12 | 0:22:15 | |
But I'm sure that... | 0:22:15 | 0:22:17 | |
We are quite proud of Emma Thompson, aren't we? | 0:22:17 | 0:22:20 | |
-JUNE: -We are. | 0:22:20 | 0:22:22 | |
I'm sure she loves our country as much as the rest of us do. | 0:22:22 | 0:22:24 | |
At least, I hope so. | 0:22:24 | 0:22:25 | |
We wouldn't have nothing to talk about, would we, if she | 0:22:25 | 0:22:28 | |
-didn't say something. -Or if it didn't rain. | 0:22:28 | 0:22:30 | |
We would, we've got have masses to talk about... | 0:22:30 | 0:22:32 | |
When it comes to her comments, if it wasn't for Britain, | 0:22:32 | 0:22:35 | |
would she be in the position she is now? | 0:22:35 | 0:22:37 | |
The hint is in the name, isn't it? GREAT Britain. | 0:22:37 | 0:22:40 | |
OK. Now, look... We had better get on. | 0:22:40 | 0:22:43 | |
Just before we go to the next question, | 0:22:43 | 0:22:46 | |
a reminder about where we will be. Next week it's Poole, | 0:22:46 | 0:22:49 | |
and the week after that it's Liverpool. | 0:22:49 | 0:22:51 | |
Funny verbal twist there. All the pools! | 0:22:51 | 0:22:54 | |
We made a list of pools - Welshpool, Hartlepool, Ullapool, | 0:22:54 | 0:22:58 | |
Blackpool, Pontypool, you can... | 0:22:58 | 0:23:00 | |
Anyway, it's Poole and Liverpool. | 0:23:00 | 0:23:03 | |
The website says how to get to us. | 0:23:03 | 0:23:05 | |
I'll give that at the end again. | 0:23:05 | 0:23:07 | |
David Haugh, please. | 0:23:07 | 0:23:09 | |
Do you agree with the Pope that | 0:23:09 | 0:23:11 | |
Donald Trump is not a Christian? | 0:23:11 | 0:23:14 | |
Let's deal with this one. | 0:23:14 | 0:23:16 | |
The Pope said today on his aeroplane | 0:23:16 | 0:23:19 | |
on his way back from Mexico | 0:23:19 | 0:23:21 | |
that a person who thinks only about building walls, referring to | 0:23:21 | 0:23:25 | |
the wall between Mexico and the United States, is not a Christian. | 0:23:25 | 0:23:29 | |
And Trump replied, the Pope would only wish and pray that | 0:23:29 | 0:23:33 | |
Donald Trump HAD been President if the Vatican was attacked by Isis. | 0:23:33 | 0:23:38 | |
I don't know... John Nicolson? | 0:23:38 | 0:23:40 | |
Um, who knows what is in Donald Trump's dark soul? | 0:23:41 | 0:23:47 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:23:47 | 0:23:48 | |
I don't think it's for me to say whether he's a Christian or | 0:23:48 | 0:23:51 | |
whether he's not a Christian. | 0:23:51 | 0:23:53 | |
He certainly doesn't seem to abide by some of the basic tenets | 0:23:53 | 0:23:57 | |
of Christianity, as I understand them - love thy neighbour | 0:23:57 | 0:24:00 | |
being one, for example, the Good Samaritan being another. | 0:24:00 | 0:24:04 | |
Doesn't seem to be too engaged with that. He's a dreadful man. | 0:24:04 | 0:24:09 | |
And... | 0:24:09 | 0:24:11 | |
The good thing is... | 0:24:11 | 0:24:13 | |
If he gets the nomination he will get absolutely | 0:24:13 | 0:24:16 | |
whipped in the general election because the problem with the | 0:24:16 | 0:24:19 | |
Republicans these days is in order to win the Republican nomination | 0:24:19 | 0:24:23 | |
you've got to go so far to the right that it makes it almost impossible | 0:24:23 | 0:24:27 | |
for you to steer back to the centre and to win a general election. | 0:24:27 | 0:24:32 | |
That's why, when we look at American politics, the Democrats just | 0:24:32 | 0:24:36 | |
keep winning because America is no longer a white, male country. | 0:24:36 | 0:24:42 | |
If you go out of your way to alienate Muslims and Mexicans | 0:24:42 | 0:24:46 | |
and gays and every other conceivable minority, you cannot bring | 0:24:46 | 0:24:51 | |
together the coalition necessary to win an election. | 0:24:51 | 0:24:54 | |
And I'm so looking forward to the night of the election | 0:24:54 | 0:24:58 | |
-and watching the smirk wiped off his face. -Mm. | 0:24:58 | 0:25:02 | |
It's a bit of a tricky one for you because you welcomed him, | 0:25:11 | 0:25:14 | |
Alex Salmond welcomed Trump to Scotland build an enormous | 0:25:14 | 0:25:17 | |
golf course on a nature reserve | 0:25:17 | 0:25:21 | |
and now you want to ban him from coming to Scotland. | 0:25:21 | 0:25:25 | |
No, I don't want to ban him. | 0:25:25 | 0:25:26 | |
I mean, there is an argument that the Home Secretary should be | 0:25:26 | 0:25:29 | |
consistent with the people that she declines to let into the country. | 0:25:29 | 0:25:33 | |
But I know you like this question, David, | 0:25:33 | 0:25:36 | |
because you have asked it before. | 0:25:36 | 0:25:38 | |
But of course, it's very important to remember | 0:25:38 | 0:25:40 | |
that the person that first... | 0:25:40 | 0:25:41 | |
What question have I asked before? | 0:25:41 | 0:25:43 | |
The question about Donald Trump being welcomed by the SNP. | 0:25:43 | 0:25:46 | |
It was in fact the Labour Party that made him | 0:25:46 | 0:25:48 | |
a trade ambassador for Scotland. | 0:25:48 | 0:25:50 | |
I just think it's worth putting that on the record. | 0:25:50 | 0:25:53 | |
Alex Salmond, I heard him saying he was wrong to have supported him. | 0:25:53 | 0:25:57 | |
But the party that made him a trade ambassador was the Labour Party. | 0:25:57 | 0:25:59 | |
But look... He's a businessman. | 0:25:59 | 0:26:01 | |
Once upon a time he worked in business | 0:26:01 | 0:26:03 | |
and he provided jobs for people. | 0:26:03 | 0:26:04 | |
And of course, in Scotland we want jobs. | 0:26:04 | 0:26:06 | |
-But I certainly don't support him as a politician. -Theo Paphitis. | 0:26:06 | 0:26:10 | |
I'm just staggered that they are even treating him seriously, | 0:26:10 | 0:26:14 | |
to be honest with you. | 0:26:14 | 0:26:16 | |
I've been watching the hustings on television | 0:26:16 | 0:26:19 | |
and some of the things that he has been saying, | 0:26:19 | 0:26:21 | |
you just wonder, you just wonder | 0:26:21 | 0:26:23 | |
what he has to say for people to say, "Stop! | 0:26:23 | 0:26:27 | |
"This man has got to go!" | 0:26:27 | 0:26:29 | |
because he keeps pushing the boundary every single time. | 0:26:29 | 0:26:33 | |
And you just think, he's going to push it... | 0:26:33 | 0:26:36 | |
I just actually believe it's a publicity stunt and he's hoping at | 0:26:36 | 0:26:40 | |
some stage he can get off the wagon and go back to doing | 0:26:40 | 0:26:43 | |
what he's doing. | 0:26:43 | 0:26:44 | |
It seems the American people just keep encouraging him. It's amazing. | 0:26:44 | 0:26:49 | |
Justine Greening? | 0:26:49 | 0:26:51 | |
I suspect that ironically this is exactly what Donald Trump loves. | 0:26:51 | 0:26:56 | |
-More publicity. -Yeah. | 0:26:56 | 0:26:58 | |
And he then gets to say something outrageous on the back of it. | 0:26:58 | 0:27:01 | |
The serious point is that he is in this seemingly leading | 0:27:01 | 0:27:06 | |
position in the Republican race. | 0:27:06 | 0:27:08 | |
And I think, as much as we might think some of the things | 0:27:08 | 0:27:11 | |
he says are funny, a bit of a joke, actually, | 0:27:11 | 0:27:14 | |
the American election for president is no joke. | 0:27:14 | 0:27:18 | |
And I think we have to wait and see how things work out. | 0:27:18 | 0:27:22 | |
But I do hope that by the time we get the two final frontrunners | 0:27:22 | 0:27:25 | |
from the Democrats and the Republicans, they are people who | 0:27:25 | 0:27:28 | |
are serious politicians with serious proposals and that we move away | 0:27:28 | 0:27:32 | |
from this almost reality-TV style of contest that we've seen so far. | 0:27:32 | 0:27:36 | |
Because we need the person who is in that role of president | 0:27:36 | 0:27:39 | |
to be someone, | 0:27:39 | 0:27:41 | |
frankly, who is going to be helping us to solve problems... | 0:27:41 | 0:27:44 | |
-The most powerful man in the world. -..not creating them. | 0:27:44 | 0:27:48 | |
But does it worry you that American democracy, | 0:27:48 | 0:27:50 | |
the democratic process, can produce Trump at this stage, | 0:27:50 | 0:27:54 | |
with this amount of support? | 0:27:54 | 0:27:56 | |
I think the problem is, unlike here in the UK | 0:27:56 | 0:27:58 | |
where there are lots of seats that are marginal seats, they switch | 0:27:58 | 0:28:01 | |
between the parties - I won a seat from Labour and I'm a Conservative - | 0:28:01 | 0:28:05 | |
there are far fewer of those in the United States. | 0:28:05 | 0:28:07 | |
So what happens is the real contest is becoming the candidate | 0:28:07 | 0:28:11 | |
for your party for the state or the seat that you're going in. | 0:28:11 | 0:28:16 | |
And what that means is that people tack off to the extreme. | 0:28:16 | 0:28:18 | |
And actually, one of the good things about the British system is | 0:28:18 | 0:28:21 | |
A - we have first-past-the-post. | 0:28:21 | 0:28:23 | |
B - we do have seats that switch regularly during the election. | 0:28:23 | 0:28:27 | |
That means people representing those communities have to | 0:28:27 | 0:28:29 | |
stay on their toes and do it well, otherwise people simply get | 0:28:29 | 0:28:32 | |
someone from an alternative party. | 0:28:32 | 0:28:34 | |
OK. June Sarpong. | 0:28:34 | 0:28:36 | |
I think, before we get to whether or not he is a Christian, | 0:28:36 | 0:28:39 | |
the question is whether or not he's a human being! | 0:28:39 | 0:28:42 | |
SHE LAUGHS | 0:28:42 | 0:28:43 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:28:43 | 0:28:46 | |
I think he is absolutely frightening | 0:28:46 | 0:28:49 | |
and the fact he's got this far should scare us all very much. | 0:28:49 | 0:28:53 | |
I'm hoping, just as Theo said, at some point people are going | 0:28:53 | 0:28:58 | |
to wake up and say, "You know what? This isn't a joke any more. | 0:28:58 | 0:29:01 | |
"This is serious. There are jobs at stake. There are lives at stake." | 0:29:01 | 0:29:04 | |
And in terms of what this means about national security, | 0:29:04 | 0:29:07 | |
this man is a threat to all of us and he needs to go. | 0:29:07 | 0:29:12 | |
Lisa. | 0:29:12 | 0:29:13 | |
-I don't feel at all qualified to... -Judge his religion...? | 0:29:13 | 0:29:16 | |
Whether he's a Christian or not. | 0:29:16 | 0:29:17 | |
Do you think the Pope is qualified to judge? | 0:29:17 | 0:29:20 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:29:20 | 0:29:21 | |
I'm sure the Pope is a lot more qualified than I am. | 0:29:21 | 0:29:24 | |
What I would say is that anyone who preys on people's insecurities | 0:29:24 | 0:29:28 | |
and does it at the expense of some of the most vulnerable people, | 0:29:28 | 0:29:31 | |
not just in his country, but in the world, isn't fit to lead. | 0:29:31 | 0:29:34 | |
And before we get a bit preachy and complacent about ourselves, | 0:29:34 | 0:29:39 | |
we should reflect on the fact that we have a Prime Minister who | 0:29:39 | 0:29:42 | |
just recently stood up at the dispatch box and referred to | 0:29:42 | 0:29:45 | |
people fleeing persecution in Syria as a "bunch of migrants". | 0:29:45 | 0:29:49 | |
I'm saying this not just because I was appalled | 0:29:49 | 0:29:52 | |
by what David Cameron said, but because I think | 0:29:52 | 0:29:56 | |
there are times in this country when we stray into that level of debate | 0:29:56 | 0:30:00 | |
ourselves and we should always be vigilant to make sure that we don't. | 0:30:00 | 0:30:04 | |
Because as we're seeing in America, you know, you start with | 0:30:04 | 0:30:07 | |
something that looks like just adding a bit of colour to politics, | 0:30:07 | 0:30:11 | |
you start with something that looks like a bit of a sideshow | 0:30:11 | 0:30:14 | |
and what you end up with is that it gathers pace and then | 0:30:14 | 0:30:17 | |
at the end it has real and profound consequences for people's lives. | 0:30:17 | 0:30:21 | |
And whether Trump gets the nomination or not, | 0:30:21 | 0:30:23 | |
whatever happens next, there will be people who have already suffered | 0:30:23 | 0:30:27 | |
as a result of what that man has said and done. | 0:30:27 | 0:30:30 | |
OK. APPLAUSE. | 0:30:30 | 0:30:32 | |
HE COUGHS Yes, you, sir. | 0:30:32 | 0:30:34 | |
I lived in the United States in the early '80s | 0:30:36 | 0:30:39 | |
and at that stage Ronald Regan was president, | 0:30:39 | 0:30:42 | |
which was scary enough. | 0:30:42 | 0:30:43 | |
But I think the recent endorsement of Donald Trump by Sarah Palin was | 0:30:43 | 0:30:47 | |
a new low for American politics | 0:30:47 | 0:30:50 | |
And I think that the sensationalisation | 0:30:50 | 0:30:53 | |
and the cheap rhetoric | 0:30:53 | 0:30:55 | |
is a poor excuse for good government and good governance. | 0:30:55 | 0:30:59 | |
OK. The woman there in the spectacles, | 0:30:59 | 0:31:01 | |
I will come to you and then we will go on. Yes, up there. | 0:31:01 | 0:31:04 | |
So you mentioned democracy in America. | 0:31:04 | 0:31:07 | |
I don't think that the issue is Trump, it is the actual system. | 0:31:07 | 0:31:11 | |
The system isn't democratic at all | 0:31:11 | 0:31:13 | |
and if you listen to a lot of his supporters, they are not as | 0:31:13 | 0:31:17 | |
much listening to what he's saying. Their main reason for supporting him | 0:31:17 | 0:31:21 | |
is that he has money and that he's not listening to pressure groups. | 0:31:21 | 0:31:25 | |
So the issue is how much American politics is run by money. | 0:31:25 | 0:31:29 | |
-People aren't really listening to what he's saying. -OK. | 0:31:29 | 0:31:32 | |
And you... | 0:31:32 | 0:31:34 | |
I think, in all honesty, I think it does make the general population | 0:31:35 | 0:31:40 | |
wonder just how farcical politics itself is becoming. | 0:31:40 | 0:31:45 | |
That probably has a greater bearing | 0:31:45 | 0:31:47 | |
on any other politician in the world. | 0:31:47 | 0:31:50 | |
If they're trying to be serious and they are seeing this kind | 0:31:50 | 0:31:53 | |
-of farcical thing going on, then... -It damages our politics as well? | 0:31:53 | 0:31:58 | |
Absolutely it does, yes. | 0:31:58 | 0:31:59 | |
Let's go to another question - | 0:31:59 | 0:32:01 | |
Annabel Matharu, please. | 0:32:01 | 0:32:03 | |
Stratford-upon-Avon has two excellent grammar schools. | 0:32:03 | 0:32:07 | |
Is it now time to remove the barriers that prevent new | 0:32:07 | 0:32:10 | |
grammar schools from opening? | 0:32:10 | 0:32:12 | |
This is a big issue here, Stratford-upon-Avon, | 0:32:12 | 0:32:14 | |
which has two very successful grammar schools, as you say. | 0:32:14 | 0:32:17 | |
But the issue is whether there should be more of those | 0:32:17 | 0:32:20 | |
and whether they damage the education system as a whole? | 0:32:20 | 0:32:24 | |
Justine Greening... | 0:32:24 | 0:32:26 | |
The Conservatives did allow a grammar school to grow, | 0:32:26 | 0:32:29 | |
put another grammar school in a nearby town, | 0:32:29 | 0:32:32 | |
but refused to allow brand-new grammar schools to start. | 0:32:32 | 0:32:36 | |
What's your policy on it? What's your view of it? | 0:32:36 | 0:32:41 | |
I think, broadly, what you have seen happening | 0:32:41 | 0:32:43 | |
over the last five to six years is | 0:32:43 | 0:32:45 | |
more and better schools, better-qualified teachers, | 0:32:45 | 0:32:48 | |
more children... Around 1.3, 1.4 million more children | 0:32:48 | 0:32:52 | |
in good or outstanding schools. | 0:32:52 | 0:32:54 | |
So our education system is doing a better job now than it has in the | 0:32:54 | 0:32:57 | |
past of preparing children for being successful in life and for work. | 0:32:57 | 0:33:01 | |
And in terms of what is the best school to do that, we have been more | 0:33:01 | 0:33:04 | |
flexible in allowing grammar schools to expand. | 0:33:04 | 0:33:07 | |
But in the end, from my perspective, it's less about that and more | 0:33:07 | 0:33:12 | |
about the teachers that are in the school, | 0:33:12 | 0:33:14 | |
whether they feel they can do the | 0:33:14 | 0:33:16 | |
best possible job, whether children have the right learning environment. | 0:33:16 | 0:33:20 | |
We tried to free up the system by allowing more free schools to | 0:33:20 | 0:33:24 | |
set up, so people with different ideas about how schools | 0:33:24 | 0:33:27 | |
should run can give those a go. | 0:33:27 | 0:33:29 | |
But it should be less of an argument about structure | 0:33:29 | 0:33:32 | |
and more about the substance | 0:33:32 | 0:33:34 | |
and the quality of what children are learning in the classroom. | 0:33:34 | 0:33:37 | |
-What do you think? -Well, I had two children. | 0:33:37 | 0:33:39 | |
One went to the local comprehensive school | 0:33:39 | 0:33:42 | |
and my daughter went to the girls' grammar school in Stratford. | 0:33:42 | 0:33:45 | |
For me, it was a case of finding | 0:33:45 | 0:33:47 | |
the right school for the right child. | 0:33:47 | 0:33:49 | |
And my daughter, who was quite academic, | 0:33:49 | 0:33:51 | |
really thrived in that academic environment, | 0:33:51 | 0:33:54 | |
and I think this one-size-fits-all in education | 0:33:54 | 0:33:57 | |
isn't necessarily right. | 0:33:57 | 0:33:58 | |
We have to find the right school for the right child. | 0:33:58 | 0:34:01 | |
I think that's an important point. I went to my local comprehensive, | 0:34:01 | 0:34:05 | |
but we have tried to make sure parents have got more choice. | 0:34:05 | 0:34:08 | |
And having a wider variety of schools | 0:34:08 | 0:34:10 | |
means there is going to be more choice on people's doorstep now | 0:34:10 | 0:34:14 | |
than we have seen in the past, which is a good thing. | 0:34:14 | 0:34:17 | |
But you think the policy should change? | 0:34:17 | 0:34:19 | |
-There should be more grammar schools? -I do, yes, definitely. | 0:34:19 | 0:34:22 | |
Theo, what do you think? | 0:34:22 | 0:34:24 | |
I think we've got to accept one big fact, | 0:34:24 | 0:34:26 | |
that not all children are the same. | 0:34:26 | 0:34:29 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:34:29 | 0:34:31 | |
And what we need to do is find choice and freedom of choice | 0:34:35 | 0:34:39 | |
and allow people to choose schools | 0:34:39 | 0:34:41 | |
that are right for their kids. I am dyslexic, | 0:34:41 | 0:34:43 | |
so I would have been a total waste of time in a grammar school. | 0:34:43 | 0:34:46 | |
In fact, I would have been negative in a grammar school, | 0:34:46 | 0:34:49 | |
I went to a comprehensive school. | 0:34:49 | 0:34:50 | |
But there's other children who will thrive in a grammar school. | 0:34:50 | 0:34:54 | |
But I think we need to be able to accept that we are all | 0:34:54 | 0:34:56 | |
very different and we've got to get the right school for our child. | 0:34:56 | 0:34:59 | |
We can't just shoehorn everybody in some mythological school that | 0:34:59 | 0:35:03 | |
just does one thing and produces the same character at the end. | 0:35:03 | 0:35:06 | |
But hang on, your comprehensive school would have had | 0:35:06 | 0:35:09 | |
people of all abilities, wouldn't it? | 0:35:09 | 0:35:11 | |
The point about the grammar school is you select, at 11 or whenever, | 0:35:11 | 0:35:14 | |
a number of children to go away and have that kind of education. | 0:35:14 | 0:35:17 | |
That's the difference between the comprehensive | 0:35:17 | 0:35:19 | |
-and grammar school system. -Well, not in practice, no, | 0:35:19 | 0:35:22 | |
because the local grammar school would have taken the other kids, | 0:35:22 | 0:35:25 | |
er, and the kids at my school were more vocational, more practical, | 0:35:25 | 0:35:30 | |
and in fact a lot of the kids in my school went on to apprenticeships. | 0:35:30 | 0:35:33 | |
And that's what suited us. | 0:35:33 | 0:35:35 | |
But you think it was better for your school not to have the more | 0:35:35 | 0:35:38 | |
-academic children in it. -I think we just... | 0:35:38 | 0:35:40 | |
Not to have the more academic, | 0:35:40 | 0:35:42 | |
but we majored in different things that actually rocked our boat, | 0:35:42 | 0:35:45 | |
-that we were interested in, that worked for us. -OK. | 0:35:45 | 0:35:49 | |
But to put a child in a situation, or a challenging situation, | 0:35:49 | 0:35:52 | |
where it's not right for them, it's not... We're all so very different. | 0:35:52 | 0:35:55 | |
-Lisa Nandy. -Well, I really disagree with pretty much everyone | 0:35:55 | 0:35:59 | |
who's spoken on this so far | 0:35:59 | 0:36:01 | |
because I think that comprehensive schools like the one I went to | 0:36:01 | 0:36:04 | |
aren't just factories, actually, | 0:36:04 | 0:36:06 | |
they are capable of dealing with the fact that they have different | 0:36:06 | 0:36:10 | |
children in them. And the point's been made that | 0:36:10 | 0:36:12 | |
not all children are the same, | 0:36:12 | 0:36:14 | |
and that surely is the reason why we shouldn't allow | 0:36:14 | 0:36:17 | |
the expansion of grammar schools, | 0:36:17 | 0:36:18 | |
because children develop at different rates, | 0:36:18 | 0:36:21 | |
they come from very different backgrounds, | 0:36:21 | 0:36:23 | |
and we know the evidence is very clear that children who come from | 0:36:23 | 0:36:26 | |
more deprived backgrounds often end up catching up later | 0:36:26 | 0:36:29 | |
in terms of their academic achievements. And I think | 0:36:29 | 0:36:32 | |
we do a real disservice not just to those children, actually, | 0:36:32 | 0:36:35 | |
but to all children when we seek to divide them in that way, | 0:36:35 | 0:36:38 | |
because the greatest thing that my comprehensive school gave to me | 0:36:38 | 0:36:42 | |
was the chance to meet and get to know children from all | 0:36:42 | 0:36:45 | |
different backgrounds and of all different abilities | 0:36:45 | 0:36:48 | |
and I think that's what we should be aiming for, | 0:36:48 | 0:36:50 | |
to give a good chance to every child, | 0:36:50 | 0:36:52 | |
not just for social advantage | 0:36:52 | 0:36:54 | |
-but for social enlightenment as well. -OK. | 0:36:54 | 0:36:59 | |
Yes, you. | 0:36:59 | 0:37:00 | |
-In the third row from the back. -Are the panel totally unaware... | 0:37:00 | 0:37:03 | |
No, the woman in the third row. I'll come to you in a moment. Yes. | 0:37:03 | 0:37:06 | |
Yeah, you made the point that it's kind of almost | 0:37:06 | 0:37:09 | |
sectioned off areas of society, so the elitist go to grammar schools, | 0:37:09 | 0:37:13 | |
the non-elitist perhaps go to comprehensive. | 0:37:13 | 0:37:16 | |
I come from a non-elitist family, I go to a local grammar school, | 0:37:16 | 0:37:19 | |
I travel about 40 minutes a day to get there. | 0:37:19 | 0:37:22 | |
My sister went to her local comprehensive. | 0:37:22 | 0:37:24 | |
She's achieved just as much as I've achieved, | 0:37:24 | 0:37:26 | |
she's accomplished everything she wanted to accomplish and so have I. | 0:37:26 | 0:37:30 | |
I think it's wrong in a way to say that it is... | 0:37:30 | 0:37:32 | |
You know, "I got to mix with a whole range of people | 0:37:32 | 0:37:35 | |
"because I went to a comprehensive." | 0:37:35 | 0:37:37 | |
I've mixed with an equally versatile and variant array of people | 0:37:37 | 0:37:40 | |
and I've been to a grammar school and my sister | 0:37:40 | 0:37:43 | |
and I have accomplished just as well as each other. | 0:37:43 | 0:37:45 | |
-So you're in favour of keeping the grammar schools? -Yeah, definitely. | 0:37:45 | 0:37:49 | |
You don't think you could have got what you got from the comprehensive? | 0:37:49 | 0:37:53 | |
I think you get different things. | 0:37:53 | 0:37:55 | |
I wouldn't have done particularly well at a comprehensive - | 0:37:55 | 0:37:58 | |
I like quite small environments - | 0:37:58 | 0:37:59 | |
whereas my sister thrived on mingling | 0:37:59 | 0:38:01 | |
and lots of different people, socialising. | 0:38:01 | 0:38:03 | |
I think it's a different learning environment. | 0:38:03 | 0:38:05 | |
Man at the back. | 0:38:05 | 0:38:07 | |
Are the panel totally unaware | 0:38:07 | 0:38:08 | |
that there's a national teacher shortage? | 0:38:08 | 0:38:11 | |
We can't recruit teachers, we can't hold on to teachers, | 0:38:11 | 0:38:15 | |
and our further education system is so underfunded it's falling apart. | 0:38:15 | 0:38:20 | |
And where do you stand on the grammar school issue? | 0:38:20 | 0:38:22 | |
You think it's relevant in that context? | 0:38:22 | 0:38:25 | |
Secondary schools were perfectly fine for me | 0:38:25 | 0:38:27 | |
-and they should be perfectly fine for everybody else. -OK. | 0:38:27 | 0:38:30 | |
Erm... SOME APPLAUSE | 0:38:30 | 0:38:32 | |
-John Nicolson. -Erm, it's a great question. | 0:38:34 | 0:38:37 | |
My grandma left school at 12 and my mum left school at 14. | 0:38:37 | 0:38:43 | |
Education has absolutely transformed my life and my prospects. | 0:38:43 | 0:38:48 | |
There is nothing more important for us as a society, I think, | 0:38:48 | 0:38:51 | |
than education, but I think 11 is far too young to choose. | 0:38:51 | 0:38:56 | |
You're not formed at 11, and we all develop at different rates, | 0:38:56 | 0:39:01 | |
so the idea of taking an 11-year-old child and saying, "Look, | 0:39:01 | 0:39:05 | |
"you should go to a grammar school because you're bright, | 0:39:05 | 0:39:08 | |
"and you're not quite so bright, | 0:39:08 | 0:39:10 | |
"and therefore you're not going to a grammar school," I think | 0:39:10 | 0:39:12 | |
sends out all the wrong signals, because you're absolutely right... | 0:39:12 | 0:39:15 | |
You're... | 0:39:18 | 0:39:19 | |
You're absolutely right, children are all different, | 0:39:19 | 0:39:22 | |
but then adults are all different as well, and we don't segregate | 0:39:22 | 0:39:26 | |
adults, and I don't think we should segregate children. | 0:39:26 | 0:39:29 | |
One of the great joys of the comprehensive school system is | 0:39:29 | 0:39:32 | |
that children mix with people of different abilities, | 0:39:32 | 0:39:35 | |
from different backgrounds and different ethnic groups, | 0:39:35 | 0:39:38 | |
different social classes, | 0:39:38 | 0:39:40 | |
and that prepares them for the rest of their lives, because we're | 0:39:40 | 0:39:43 | |
going to spend the rest of our lives mixing with very different people. | 0:39:43 | 0:39:46 | |
Do you mean bright or academic? | 0:39:46 | 0:39:49 | |
I take exception to that, do you mean bright or academic? | 0:39:49 | 0:39:52 | |
Well, a bit... Well, obviously academic. | 0:39:52 | 0:39:54 | |
Well, no, they're different words, totally different words. | 0:39:54 | 0:39:57 | |
They are, but try teaching that to a child, | 0:39:57 | 0:39:59 | |
because if at 11 you're told that you're not going into that class, | 0:39:59 | 0:40:03 | |
you're going into another class, you won't make that distinction, | 0:40:03 | 0:40:06 | |
you'll just think you haven't made the grade, and it's wrong | 0:40:06 | 0:40:09 | |
-to treat children like that. -That's the generalisation. | 0:40:09 | 0:40:11 | |
The woman in green up there, I want to hear from the audience. | 0:40:11 | 0:40:14 | |
Now, I teach in a non-selective local school. | 0:40:14 | 0:40:17 | |
When I say local, it's actually 15 miles from here, but because | 0:40:17 | 0:40:20 | |
of the boundaries we actually fall into the same category. | 0:40:20 | 0:40:24 | |
Now, it seems to be the opinion of everybody I've heard so far | 0:40:24 | 0:40:28 | |
that if you've got local grammar schools they somehow | 0:40:28 | 0:40:31 | |
detract from the other schools in the locality. | 0:40:31 | 0:40:34 | |
It's absolutely not true. | 0:40:34 | 0:40:36 | |
My school is one of the top schools in the country | 0:40:36 | 0:40:39 | |
and we are totally non-selective, | 0:40:39 | 0:40:41 | |
and yet a lot of the students go to the local grammar schools here. | 0:40:41 | 0:40:45 | |
So do you have any view | 0:40:45 | 0:40:46 | |
about whether it's desirable to have more grammar schools? | 0:40:46 | 0:40:49 | |
Are you saying they can live perfectly well cheek by jowl? | 0:40:49 | 0:40:52 | |
I think they can live perfectly well side-by-side and I think | 0:40:52 | 0:40:55 | |
academic children deserve the right to have a more academic one and... | 0:40:55 | 0:40:59 | |
APPLAUSE OK. | 0:40:59 | 0:41:02 | |
And the... Thank you. | 0:41:02 | 0:41:04 | |
The woman in the...black dress with the white spots. | 0:41:04 | 0:41:08 | |
Erm, a few of the panel have mentioned about the importance | 0:41:08 | 0:41:12 | |
of choice, and while I agree with that, | 0:41:12 | 0:41:14 | |
in that all children are different | 0:41:14 | 0:41:16 | |
and will thrive in different environments, as a parent myself, | 0:41:16 | 0:41:20 | |
what I want to know is whatever my local school is there is | 0:41:20 | 0:41:23 | |
a good standard of education and my child will get a good education, | 0:41:23 | 0:41:27 | |
and, yes, it is nice to have choice | 0:41:27 | 0:41:29 | |
but actually wherever children go to school we want them | 0:41:29 | 0:41:33 | |
all to be getting that good standard of care, of education, | 0:41:33 | 0:41:36 | |
wherever they go and whatever the choices. | 0:41:36 | 0:41:39 | |
-June Sarpong. -Well, I think | 0:41:39 | 0:41:41 | |
that grammar schools do not address one of the biggest problems | 0:41:41 | 0:41:44 | |
we have in our education system, which is | 0:41:44 | 0:41:47 | |
the low literacy rates of boys from poor communities. | 0:41:47 | 0:41:51 | |
Our education system is completely failing them. | 0:41:51 | 0:41:54 | |
So grammar schools help the gifted children, | 0:41:54 | 0:41:57 | |
but what are we going to do about the whole generation of young boys | 0:41:57 | 0:42:00 | |
from poor families who are completely being left to just... | 0:42:00 | 0:42:05 | |
just squander because we are not investing in those? | 0:42:05 | 0:42:07 | |
-And I think that's what we also need to be looking at. -OK. You... | 0:42:07 | 0:42:10 | |
-And this government needs to be addressing it. -You, sir. | 0:42:10 | 0:42:13 | |
I think I'm reasonably well qualified to talk about this | 0:42:14 | 0:42:18 | |
because I taught in one of those grammar schools. | 0:42:18 | 0:42:21 | |
I've also been in about 100 schools over the last five years | 0:42:21 | 0:42:25 | |
as a supply teacher. | 0:42:25 | 0:42:26 | |
And one of the things that I would say | 0:42:26 | 0:42:29 | |
is that there are three key things about this. | 0:42:29 | 0:42:32 | |
One is that you make sure that you get the very best people to be | 0:42:32 | 0:42:37 | |
the head teachers and that they have around them a really good | 0:42:37 | 0:42:41 | |
team of senior teachers who can support them in everything they do. | 0:42:41 | 0:42:46 | |
But that would apply to all schools, private, grammar or comprehensive. | 0:42:46 | 0:42:50 | |
Very much so. Secondly, more important than this, | 0:42:50 | 0:42:53 | |
teachers are getting buried under paperwork | 0:42:53 | 0:42:56 | |
and they are being forced by league tables and Ofsted to comply | 0:42:56 | 0:43:02 | |
to all sorts of rules which are just plainly against education... | 0:43:02 | 0:43:07 | |
But again, sorry, this would apply to private and grammar | 0:43:07 | 0:43:11 | |
-and comprehensive schools. -Absolutely. | 0:43:11 | 0:43:13 | |
The question is about whether grammar schools are desirable. | 0:43:13 | 0:43:16 | |
Well, personally I...I think that it really doesn't matter particularly. | 0:43:16 | 0:43:22 | |
The most important thing is that the system is changed radically | 0:43:22 | 0:43:28 | |
and very soon, before all the teachers that the gentleman | 0:43:28 | 0:43:31 | |
at the back referred to, who are leaving the profession... | 0:43:31 | 0:43:34 | |
I know why they're leaving the profession, | 0:43:34 | 0:43:37 | |
because they're actually sickened off by what is going on. | 0:43:37 | 0:43:41 | |
Irrelevant whether we have academies, | 0:43:41 | 0:43:44 | |
grammar schools, comprehensives. | 0:43:44 | 0:43:46 | |
Make sure that the teaching profession is valued, | 0:43:46 | 0:43:51 | |
because it is a very important profession and it is one that | 0:43:51 | 0:43:55 | |
people should look up to, not try and slate, | 0:43:55 | 0:43:57 | |
-and this is very important. -But would you... | 0:43:57 | 0:44:01 | |
-would you abandon testing of schools, would you...? -Yes! | 0:44:01 | 0:44:05 | |
-Definitely. -You would abandon all of that? -Definitely. | 0:44:05 | 0:44:08 | |
-There are systems working... -APPLAUSE | 0:44:08 | 0:44:11 | |
There are systems working in Europe which don't test | 0:44:11 | 0:44:15 | |
children to the nth degree. This is getting ridiculous, people are... | 0:44:15 | 0:44:19 | |
-JOHN NICOLSON: -Finland, for example. | 0:44:19 | 0:44:21 | |
Teachers are now teaching to the exam. | 0:44:21 | 0:44:24 | |
I've been in a really good school in Northamptonshire | 0:44:24 | 0:44:27 | |
for the last four weeks. | 0:44:27 | 0:44:29 | |
The senior teachers there say that we are playing the exam game | 0:44:29 | 0:44:35 | |
because we know that we've got talented | 0:44:35 | 0:44:38 | |
pupils in our school who've just got to be schooled through the exams. | 0:44:38 | 0:44:42 | |
-That's not education. -All right, well... | 0:44:42 | 0:44:45 | |
That's nothing like it! | 0:44:45 | 0:44:47 | |
-APPLAUSE -Nothing like it! | 0:44:47 | 0:44:50 | |
Well, a lot of these new tests were introduced by Michael Gove | 0:44:54 | 0:44:57 | |
when he was Education Secretary, Justine. | 0:44:57 | 0:44:59 | |
What do you make of what he's said? | 0:44:59 | 0:45:01 | |
I think we've got to make sure that | 0:45:01 | 0:45:03 | |
if we are measuring schools that it is worthwhile and it allows | 0:45:03 | 0:45:07 | |
parents to have meaningful information so they can get | 0:45:07 | 0:45:10 | |
a sense of how their child is doing, | 0:45:10 | 0:45:12 | |
but also how the school overall is doing. | 0:45:12 | 0:45:14 | |
Go to the school and then you would realise what it's really about! | 0:45:14 | 0:45:18 | |
Just go into the school, speak to the head teacher, | 0:45:18 | 0:45:20 | |
speak to the people who are really in charge and then you will know. | 0:45:20 | 0:45:24 | |
You will feel its pulse. | 0:45:24 | 0:45:25 | |
You are right and I have spent ten years as a school governor | 0:45:25 | 0:45:29 | |
in my local community as well. | 0:45:29 | 0:45:31 | |
The key to this is, | 0:45:31 | 0:45:32 | |
as I said to the response before, is making sure there is a learning | 0:45:32 | 0:45:36 | |
environment and that teachers can get on with their job, but we need | 0:45:36 | 0:45:40 | |
to make sure parents have got the kind of information they | 0:45:40 | 0:45:43 | |
need to know about how the school is doing and how their child is doing. | 0:45:43 | 0:45:48 | |
What I did want to say was there are lots of places in Britain | 0:45:48 | 0:45:52 | |
where we are seeing our schools radically improve and get better. | 0:45:52 | 0:45:56 | |
I am an MP in London and we've really seen London schools | 0:45:56 | 0:45:59 | |
come on in leaps and bounds over recent years. | 0:45:59 | 0:46:02 | |
We now need to make sure we understand how that | 0:46:02 | 0:46:05 | |
kind of progress is happening and why. | 0:46:05 | 0:46:08 | |
I agree, a lot of it is about leadership | 0:46:08 | 0:46:10 | |
and the senior leadership team around a head teacher. | 0:46:10 | 0:46:14 | |
I have a fantastic school in my constituency | 0:46:14 | 0:46:17 | |
called Ronald Ross which has transformed over the last two | 0:46:17 | 0:46:20 | |
years and it's because of that. | 0:46:20 | 0:46:22 | |
We know what works, the question is how can we make sure that in | 0:46:22 | 0:46:25 | |
schools that are failing - and some can be in affluent areas as well - | 0:46:25 | 0:46:28 | |
how we don't accept that? | 0:46:28 | 0:46:30 | |
And if we need to change leadership we should. | 0:46:30 | 0:46:33 | |
You have to engage the parents. | 0:46:33 | 0:46:35 | |
We need to make the parents feel they are involved in the school, | 0:46:35 | 0:46:39 | |
they have an engagement with the school, because that transforms | 0:46:39 | 0:46:43 | |
the quality of education for children, | 0:46:43 | 0:46:45 | |
if parents don't feel locked out. | 0:46:45 | 0:46:47 | |
We have ten minutes left. I want to move on to another point | 0:46:47 | 0:46:52 | |
unless anybody wants to desperately come in with something. | 0:46:52 | 0:46:56 | |
Yes. You've spoken already tonight, haven't you? You, sir. | 0:46:56 | 0:47:00 | |
I would say, I work in what would be a comprehensive school, | 0:47:00 | 0:47:04 | |
-now an academy. I've worked there for ten years. -As a teacher? | 0:47:04 | 0:47:08 | |
No. That is an important thing. I was in business. | 0:47:08 | 0:47:11 | |
I now work as an enterprise manager, a work experience manager helping | 0:47:11 | 0:47:16 | |
people, our students, to link with the world of academia and business. | 0:47:16 | 0:47:21 | |
Yes, grammar schools are desirable. I went to one. | 0:47:21 | 0:47:24 | |
My old comp, now an academy, is desirable. | 0:47:24 | 0:47:27 | |
I work there every day and work with fantastic colleagues... | 0:47:27 | 0:47:32 | |
Do you think there should be more grammar schools than there are? | 0:47:32 | 0:47:36 | |
Personally, I think there should be more schools. | 0:47:36 | 0:47:40 | |
There should be more schools, quite honestly, | 0:47:40 | 0:47:43 | |
either grammar or whatever. | 0:47:43 | 0:47:45 | |
The point I'm trying to say is - what you have all said is brilliant | 0:47:45 | 0:47:49 | |
because it's getting that for the right thing. | 0:47:49 | 0:47:52 | |
The only test that you need is that the student comes out of that | 0:47:52 | 0:47:56 | |
school well prepared for life. | 0:47:56 | 0:47:58 | |
Whatever school gives them that is the best school. | 0:47:58 | 0:48:01 | |
Last quick point. | 0:48:01 | 0:48:03 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:48:03 | 0:48:05 | |
Very briefly, if you would. | 0:48:07 | 0:48:08 | |
What I've heard during this discussion is segregation, elitism. | 0:48:08 | 0:48:12 | |
What I keep hearing - grammar school, comprehensive, academy - | 0:48:12 | 0:48:16 | |
far too many levels of separation. | 0:48:16 | 0:48:18 | |
We have faith schools, comprehensive, grammar - | 0:48:18 | 0:48:22 | |
all we are encouraging is segregation. | 0:48:22 | 0:48:24 | |
Separating societies and isolating young people in establishments | 0:48:24 | 0:48:29 | |
and expecting them to come together as adults, | 0:48:29 | 0:48:32 | |
and they will have challenges then. | 0:48:32 | 0:48:35 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:48:35 | 0:48:37 | |
You are against faith schools, you're against grammar schools... | 0:48:37 | 0:48:42 | |
We have too many. What's next? We keep separating. | 0:48:42 | 0:48:45 | |
Next we might have segregation in councils, | 0:48:45 | 0:48:49 | |
in the NHS, for example. | 0:48:49 | 0:48:50 | |
Why is there a need to separate and have all these separations going on? | 0:48:50 | 0:48:56 | |
OK. Thank you very much for that. | 0:48:56 | 0:48:58 | |
-Can I say...? -No. Be brief. | 0:48:58 | 0:48:59 | |
Equality of opportunity - | 0:48:59 | 0:49:01 | |
that is how you stop segregation in the long term. | 0:49:01 | 0:49:04 | |
Kids coming out of school feeling like they all have a great chance | 0:49:04 | 0:49:07 | |
of being successful in our country wherever they start. | 0:49:07 | 0:49:11 | |
That goes without saying. | 0:49:11 | 0:49:13 | |
Nick Rendell, your question, please. | 0:49:13 | 0:49:16 | |
My 87-year-old mother pays just over 50% more than me for electricity. | 0:49:16 | 0:49:21 | |
Why has Ofgem been so hopeless at protecting the vulnerable? | 0:49:21 | 0:49:25 | |
Why is your 87-year-old mother paying 50% more than you? | 0:49:25 | 0:49:29 | |
-Well, she's not any more. I changed it at the weekend. -Right. | 0:49:29 | 0:49:33 | |
You could protect her rather than Ofgem! | 0:49:33 | 0:49:36 | |
I only discovered it at the weekend and we've sorted it out. | 0:49:36 | 0:49:40 | |
My point is really, I think someone who is 87 is maybe... | 0:49:40 | 0:49:43 | |
her eyesight is not as good. | 0:49:43 | 0:49:45 | |
The internet is the only way you can get really good prices. | 0:49:45 | 0:49:50 | |
I don't give a damn how much the people in this room pay because | 0:49:50 | 0:49:52 | |
they can all access the market, perfectly easily access the market. | 0:49:52 | 0:49:56 | |
70% of the population choose not to change their utility prices, | 0:49:56 | 0:50:00 | |
which is their lookout. | 0:50:00 | 0:50:02 | |
I'm concerned about people who don't have internet access, | 0:50:02 | 0:50:06 | |
can't access the sainted Martin Lewis' website | 0:50:06 | 0:50:11 | |
to get the best prices on the market, | 0:50:11 | 0:50:13 | |
which is lower than the standard rate price | 0:50:13 | 0:50:17 | |
which 70% of the population pays. | 0:50:17 | 0:50:19 | |
Lisa Nandy is the Shadow Energy Secretary. What do you say? | 0:50:19 | 0:50:23 | |
The energy market is not competitive enough. | 0:50:23 | 0:50:27 | |
I would say that it can be incredibly confusing | 0:50:27 | 0:50:29 | |
and it makes it difficult for people like your mum who aren't | 0:50:29 | 0:50:33 | |
necessarily on the internet, like you said, | 0:50:33 | 0:50:35 | |
can't necessarily weed out where the best deals might be found. | 0:50:35 | 0:50:40 | |
Actually, I do care about everybody else as well because it has | 0:50:40 | 0:50:44 | |
become increasingly clear in recent years that most of us are getting | 0:50:44 | 0:50:48 | |
ripped off by the energy market and the way that it works at the moment. | 0:50:48 | 0:50:53 | |
Today, we saw British Gas announce a leap in profits of 31%. | 0:50:53 | 0:50:58 | |
Yet we have seen a dramatic fall in the wholesale price of gas | 0:50:58 | 0:51:02 | |
and those falls have not been passed on to consumers. | 0:51:02 | 0:51:06 | |
There's a body called the Competition and Markets Authority | 0:51:06 | 0:51:09 | |
that was commissioned to look at the way | 0:51:09 | 0:51:12 | |
that the energy market is working. | 0:51:12 | 0:51:15 | |
That found that consumers had been overcharged to the tune | 0:51:15 | 0:51:18 | |
of £1.2 billion a year every year between 2009-2013. | 0:51:18 | 0:51:23 | |
The truth is, the Energy Secretary says she has been crystal clear | 0:51:23 | 0:51:28 | |
that the companies need to change their behaviour. | 0:51:28 | 0:51:31 | |
But the energy companies have been crystal clear | 0:51:31 | 0:51:34 | |
they are not listening. | 0:51:34 | 0:51:36 | |
When she wrote to the Big Six, only two could be bothered to reply. | 0:51:36 | 0:51:41 | |
I think we need real action to bring proper competition into this market. | 0:51:41 | 0:51:46 | |
Next month the CMA will report. | 0:51:46 | 0:51:48 | |
They said last year that we should have a safeguard tariff to | 0:51:48 | 0:51:52 | |
make sure that people, particularly the vulnerable, | 0:51:52 | 0:51:55 | |
get the best deal in the market. | 0:51:55 | 0:51:58 | |
They got a lot of kickback from the industry on that. | 0:51:58 | 0:52:01 | |
What I want to see next month is some really bold proposals | 0:52:01 | 0:52:04 | |
that give us real competition, that give us decent deals. | 0:52:04 | 0:52:07 | |
I want to see a government that is prepared to step in and act | 0:52:07 | 0:52:11 | |
and not just lecture the energy companies who aren't listening. | 0:52:11 | 0:52:14 | |
So we're all getting ripped off | 0:52:20 | 0:52:22 | |
and the energy companies ignore your Energy Secretary. | 0:52:22 | 0:52:26 | |
First of all, I have to point out | 0:52:26 | 0:52:28 | |
if we had what Labour wanted at the last election | 0:52:28 | 0:52:30 | |
we would have had an energy price freeze which would mean a cap... | 0:52:30 | 0:52:34 | |
Cap, which means it couldn't go above a certain amount. | 0:52:34 | 0:52:37 | |
..we wouldn't see the kind of falls we are seeing now. | 0:52:37 | 0:52:40 | |
That is not true, you know that. | 0:52:40 | 0:52:42 | |
This government had the CMA look into this situation | 0:52:42 | 0:52:45 | |
and more than that, though, as you will know, | 0:52:45 | 0:52:47 | |
we've brought through legislation that means simpler tariffs | 0:52:47 | 0:52:51 | |
and energy companies having to flag up to people | 0:52:51 | 0:52:54 | |
when they are on a more expensive tariff than they ought to be. | 0:52:54 | 0:52:57 | |
"What has it achieved?" is my question to you. | 0:52:57 | 0:53:00 | |
It's a lot more than you achieved over 13 years which saw competition | 0:53:00 | 0:53:04 | |
exit the market, and we're trying to get competition back into it. | 0:53:04 | 0:53:08 | |
-Not true. -It's not quite so straightforward | 0:53:08 | 0:53:11 | |
to say this problem has arisen now. | 0:53:11 | 0:53:13 | |
We are making sure Ofgem has teeth, | 0:53:13 | 0:53:16 | |
making sure the market operates effectively, | 0:53:16 | 0:53:18 | |
making sure consumers do know whether they are on the best | 0:53:18 | 0:53:21 | |
tariff or not and making the tariff simpler. | 0:53:21 | 0:53:23 | |
That is why that gentleman knows his mother is | 0:53:23 | 0:53:26 | |
not on as good a tariff as she should be. | 0:53:26 | 0:53:29 | |
-The tariff system is mad. -What? -The tariff system is mad! | 0:53:29 | 0:53:32 | |
Which is why it's been simplified. | 0:53:32 | 0:53:34 | |
If you try to find what you're paying per kilowatt-hour, | 0:53:34 | 0:53:37 | |
it's virtually impossible. | 0:53:37 | 0:53:39 | |
I've never known a market that can be so mismanaged. | 0:53:39 | 0:53:43 | |
I think again, I don't think it's the companies. | 0:53:43 | 0:53:46 | |
I think it is Ofgem who have structured the system. | 0:53:46 | 0:53:49 | |
If you go on to the website, you try and find how much you pay | 0:53:49 | 0:53:52 | |
per kilowatt-hour and the tariffs are buried so far away | 0:53:52 | 0:53:56 | |
-it's virtually impossible to find it. -You at the back. | 0:53:56 | 0:54:00 | |
I think the regulators need to be brought to book. | 0:54:00 | 0:54:04 | |
The companies, while they are in private hands, | 0:54:05 | 0:54:07 | |
will try to maximise their profits. | 0:54:07 | 0:54:09 | |
It's up to the regulators to control that | 0:54:09 | 0:54:11 | |
and to stop people getting ripped off. | 0:54:11 | 0:54:13 | |
All those British Gas customers that haven't had a price decrease | 0:54:13 | 0:54:16 | |
should get a rebate today. | 0:54:16 | 0:54:19 | |
John Nicolson? | 0:54:19 | 0:54:20 | |
You need a PhD in Applied Maths to understand the tariffs. | 0:54:20 | 0:54:24 | |
Maybe that is what we should teach 11-year-olds to help them | 0:54:24 | 0:54:29 | |
later in life. | 0:54:29 | 0:54:30 | |
It is disgraceful that old people are shivering in their homes | 0:54:30 | 0:54:34 | |
and scared to turn on their energy supply. | 0:54:34 | 0:54:38 | |
It is disgraceful. It has gone on for far too long. | 0:54:38 | 0:54:41 | |
We don't have a functioning system of competition. | 0:54:41 | 0:54:44 | |
One of the problems, of course, is that people don't switch. | 0:54:44 | 0:54:47 | |
They don't switch because they can't understand | 0:54:47 | 0:54:50 | |
the benefits of switching. | 0:54:50 | 0:54:51 | |
Many of them stay with the old utility companies that have | 0:54:51 | 0:54:54 | |
been privatised and so a lot of people are paying | 0:54:54 | 0:54:57 | |
much more than they need to. | 0:54:57 | 0:54:58 | |
They get little help from the government in understanding it. | 0:54:58 | 0:55:02 | |
One of the disgraces, of course, is when energy supplies | 0:55:02 | 0:55:07 | |
come down in price, those are not passed on to the consumer. | 0:55:07 | 0:55:13 | |
When they go up, then they are passed on to the consumer | 0:55:13 | 0:55:16 | |
as quickly as the energy companies can possibly do. | 0:55:16 | 0:55:20 | |
So they are rascals, the energy companies. | 0:55:20 | 0:55:23 | |
They need to be called to heel | 0:55:23 | 0:55:26 | |
and they need to be strictly regulated. | 0:55:26 | 0:55:29 | |
Theo Paphitis... Do you come to the defence of the energy companies? | 0:55:29 | 0:55:33 | |
We have a minute or two left. | 0:55:33 | 0:55:35 | |
We talked about the regulator. | 0:55:35 | 0:55:38 | |
They have to be called to account here. | 0:55:38 | 0:55:41 | |
But each company has their tariffs. | 0:55:41 | 0:55:45 | |
They have got more details on our usage than we have. | 0:55:45 | 0:55:48 | |
They know exactly what we're spending. | 0:55:48 | 0:55:51 | |
It's not rocket science for them to automatically put | 0:55:51 | 0:55:55 | |
everybody on the right tariff that's best for them. | 0:55:55 | 0:55:58 | |
But for some reason, they don't wish to do so. | 0:55:58 | 0:56:01 | |
It's down to the regulator. | 0:56:01 | 0:56:02 | |
-They could be instructed to do so. -It's dead easy. | 0:56:02 | 0:56:06 | |
We have legislated for energy companies to have to be clear | 0:56:06 | 0:56:11 | |
with people when they are not on the right tariff. | 0:56:11 | 0:56:15 | |
They are saying it's not happening. | 0:56:15 | 0:56:17 | |
You don't have to be clear or notify them - | 0:56:17 | 0:56:21 | |
you don't have to do anything. | 0:56:21 | 0:56:23 | |
It's really, really easy, this. | 0:56:23 | 0:56:25 | |
-You just do it. -June. -I'm with Theo. | 0:56:25 | 0:56:28 | |
OK. All right. | 0:56:28 | 0:56:29 | |
You, sir, there on the left. We have to come to an end. | 0:56:29 | 0:56:34 | |
I know it's Stratford-upon-Avon, so I might be in the minority. | 0:56:34 | 0:56:39 | |
Why don't we nationalise the energy sector? | 0:56:39 | 0:56:41 | |
Because it should work for the benefit of the people. | 0:56:41 | 0:56:46 | |
That ship has sailed, unfortunately. | 0:56:46 | 0:56:49 | |
That ship has sailed. The last point here. | 0:56:49 | 0:56:52 | |
I have a friend who moved to Spain, they get the winter fuel allowance. | 0:56:53 | 0:56:58 | |
How can that be? | 0:56:58 | 0:57:00 | |
Again, that's something that we are changing and announced | 0:57:00 | 0:57:03 | |
I think at the last Budget that we are not going to be paying | 0:57:03 | 0:57:07 | |
the winter fuel allowance to people living in countries like Spain. | 0:57:07 | 0:57:11 | |
The person there. Yes, you. | 0:57:11 | 0:57:13 | |
Do you not think that the government should be helping smaller | 0:57:13 | 0:57:17 | |
energy firms to grow so that bigger energy firms | 0:57:17 | 0:57:20 | |
don't have a monopoly over the market? | 0:57:20 | 0:57:23 | |
Especially because what we really need to see is a lot more | 0:57:23 | 0:57:26 | |
competition in where our energy comes from. | 0:57:26 | 0:57:29 | |
What this government did when it attacked renewables | 0:57:29 | 0:57:32 | |
and removed overnight the subsidies for solar and wind energy and taken | 0:57:32 | 0:57:36 | |
away the tax relief for community energy projects has meant that more | 0:57:36 | 0:57:40 | |
power is given to the Big Six energy companies | 0:57:40 | 0:57:43 | |
and taken away from people. | 0:57:43 | 0:57:45 | |
Brief point. | 0:57:45 | 0:57:47 | |
Labour and the Tories blaming each other. | 0:57:49 | 0:57:52 | |
One thing they could have controlled in office | 0:57:52 | 0:57:55 | |
was the level of tax on fuel, whether it is gas, | 0:57:55 | 0:57:57 | |
electricity or petrol. | 0:57:57 | 0:57:59 | |
None of them ever seem to bother to do it. | 0:57:59 | 0:58:01 | |
When it comes to green taxes, | 0:58:01 | 0:58:04 | |
that is part of the reason why | 0:58:04 | 0:58:07 | |
fuel prices, energy prices are so high. | 0:58:07 | 0:58:10 | |
-We have to stop. -I would agree with Piers Corbyn, not Jeremy! | 0:58:10 | 0:58:16 | |
Yeah, we might go into that another time. | 0:58:16 | 0:58:19 | |
A whole new debate. | 0:58:19 | 0:58:20 | |
Our energy has not run out, has it? But we have to stop, the time is up. | 0:58:20 | 0:58:24 | |
Now, where will we be next week? Poole in Dorset. | 0:58:24 | 0:58:28 | |
Julian Fellowes, who wrote Downton Abbey, will be on the panel. | 0:58:28 | 0:58:31 | |
That's all I know for the moment. | 0:58:31 | 0:58:34 | |
The week after in Liverpool, where we always get a good programme. | 0:58:34 | 0:58:37 | |
If you want to come to Poole or Liverpool, go to our website | 0:58:37 | 0:58:41 | |
or call us: | 0:58:41 | 0:58:43 | |
On Radio 5 Live this debate goes on, on Question Time Extra Time. | 0:58:45 | 0:58:49 | |
From here, my thanks to all our panellists | 0:58:49 | 0:58:51 | |
and to all of you who came to Stratford-upon-Avon to take part. | 0:58:51 | 0:58:56 | |
Until next Thursday, from Question Time, goodnight! | 0:58:56 | 0:59:00 |