Browse content similar to 25/02/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Tonight, we are in Poole in Dorset, and this is Question Time. | 0:00:02 | 0:00:05 | |
And of course, welcome to all of you and to people watching at home, | 0:00:11 | 0:00:14 | |
or listening on the radio, | 0:00:14 | 0:00:16 | |
and to our panel. Tonight, our panel is | 0:00:16 | 0:00:19 | |
the Conservative Environment Secretary, Elizabeth Truss, | 0:00:19 | 0:00:22 | |
Labour's Shadow International Development Secretary, Diane Abbott, | 0:00:22 | 0:00:26 | |
the columnist and broadcaster, Julia Hartley-Brewer, | 0:00:26 | 0:00:30 | |
the parish priest and Guardian columnist, Giles Fraser, | 0:00:30 | 0:00:34 | |
and the creator of Downton Abbey | 0:00:34 | 0:00:35 | |
who takes the Tory whip in the House of Lords, Julian Fellowes. | 0:00:35 | 0:00:39 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:00:39 | 0:00:42 | |
As always, a reminder you can join in this debate from home. | 0:00:51 | 0:00:54 | |
Facebook, Twitter, #bbcqt. | 0:00:54 | 0:00:56 | |
You can like us or not as you choose. | 0:00:56 | 0:00:59 | |
You can follow us - @BBCQuestionTime, | 0:00:59 | 0:01:01 | |
you can text comments to 83981, press the red button to see what | 0:01:01 | 0:01:04 | |
others are saying. | 0:01:04 | 0:01:06 | |
Before I take the first question, we are now into the | 0:01:06 | 0:01:10 | |
referendum campaign, I suppose. | 0:01:10 | 0:01:13 | |
We've got just 17 weeks to go before the vote. | 0:01:13 | 0:01:15 | |
So here on Question Time, | 0:01:15 | 0:01:18 | |
we're going to be trying to balance our panels | 0:01:18 | 0:01:20 | |
and our audiences to meet both sides of the argument. | 0:01:20 | 0:01:25 | |
Tonight, for instance, we have | 0:01:25 | 0:01:27 | |
two politicians who want Britain to remain and three | 0:01:27 | 0:01:31 | |
non-politicians, who I think we shall see, want to leave. | 0:01:31 | 0:01:34 | |
And we'll chop and change as the weeks go on. | 0:01:34 | 0:01:38 | |
And we'll expect everybody on either side to | 0:01:38 | 0:01:40 | |
speak up loudly in the audience, | 0:01:40 | 0:01:42 | |
so that we don't get accused of bias. | 0:01:42 | 0:01:44 | |
Darrel Kwong, please, has the first question. | 0:01:44 | 0:01:46 | |
323,000 net immigration. Surely we have to leave the EU | 0:01:46 | 0:01:51 | |
to get control? | 0:01:51 | 0:01:53 | |
OK. We have to leave the EU to get control of immigration. | 0:01:53 | 0:01:56 | |
Big point. Liz Truss. | 0:01:56 | 0:01:58 | |
It is certainly the case | 0:01:58 | 0:02:00 | |
that we have to do more to address immigration. | 0:02:00 | 0:02:03 | |
We have worked very hard on this. | 0:02:03 | 0:02:05 | |
We've put in a cap for migrants | 0:02:05 | 0:02:07 | |
from outside the EU. | 0:02:07 | 0:02:09 | |
And the deal that David Cameron has negotiated in Europe will mean | 0:02:09 | 0:02:12 | |
that we do reduce the pull factors in terms of welfare and benefits, | 0:02:12 | 0:02:18 | |
so that people can't start claiming the minute they arrive in Britain, | 0:02:18 | 0:02:22 | |
and they do have to look for a job straightaway. | 0:02:22 | 0:02:24 | |
And if they don't get a job, then they will have to leave. | 0:02:24 | 0:02:28 | |
That is what is really important to British people, that | 0:02:28 | 0:02:31 | |
the rules are fair and people... | 0:02:31 | 0:02:33 | |
Are you going to get down to the 100,000 that Cameron promised? | 0:02:33 | 0:02:36 | |
And people aren't getting something for nothing. | 0:02:36 | 0:02:39 | |
Are you going to get down to the 100,000? 300,000 at the moment. | 0:02:39 | 0:02:42 | |
That is still our aim, David, and we have seen the most recent | 0:02:42 | 0:02:47 | |
figures in quarterly returns have dipped slightly. | 0:02:47 | 0:02:49 | |
But we do need to make more progress. | 0:02:49 | 0:02:52 | |
But what I would say here is, | 0:02:52 | 0:02:54 | |
in terms of our debate about the European Union, | 0:02:54 | 0:02:58 | |
free movement of people is a very important | 0:02:58 | 0:03:00 | |
part of the single market. And the single market brings huge | 0:03:00 | 0:03:04 | |
benefits to Britain. | 0:03:04 | 0:03:05 | |
There is £150 billion worth of trade | 0:03:05 | 0:03:08 | |
we do with the single market every year. | 0:03:08 | 0:03:11 | |
We've got access to everything, unfettered access to selling our | 0:03:11 | 0:03:15 | |
services, selling our goods, selling our farmed products. | 0:03:15 | 0:03:19 | |
And I think it would be hugely damaging for us to leave | 0:03:19 | 0:03:22 | |
that single market. | 0:03:22 | 0:03:23 | |
But Darrel is talking about immigration. There are lots of | 0:03:23 | 0:03:26 | |
aspects to this vote. He's talking about immigration. | 0:03:26 | 0:03:28 | |
What I am saying is that free movement does go hand in hand | 0:03:28 | 0:03:33 | |
with being part of the single market, | 0:03:33 | 0:03:36 | |
so anybody who says that they want to get rid | 0:03:36 | 0:03:38 | |
of free movement also has to accept | 0:03:38 | 0:03:41 | |
that means getting out, in some way, of the single market. | 0:03:41 | 0:03:45 | |
It means not being able to sell our goods and services. | 0:03:45 | 0:03:48 | |
It means less growth here in Britain, | 0:03:48 | 0:03:51 | |
and it means people not being able to benefit from those | 0:03:51 | 0:03:55 | |
exports, which means jobs, it means businesses, | 0:03:55 | 0:03:57 | |
-it means people being able to buy their homes. -OK, but... | 0:03:57 | 0:04:01 | |
What I am saying is there is no utopia | 0:04:01 | 0:04:03 | |
where we can simply close the borders and say, | 0:04:03 | 0:04:06 | |
our economy will remain intact and remain the same. | 0:04:06 | 0:04:09 | |
-It won't. -The question is about immigration. | 0:04:09 | 0:04:12 | |
If we left the EU, in your opinion would we be able to control | 0:04:12 | 0:04:15 | |
immigration and get it down to the kind of figures | 0:04:15 | 0:04:18 | |
the Tory Government promised? | 0:04:18 | 0:04:20 | |
Of course we could totally close our borders and close off trade with | 0:04:20 | 0:04:24 | |
the rest of the world, but we would be very, very poorly off | 0:04:24 | 0:04:28 | |
-and we would see economic stagnation. -All right. | 0:04:28 | 0:04:31 | |
And I don't think that's an option. | 0:04:31 | 0:04:33 | |
-Julian Fellowes. -We know also that we don't have enough | 0:04:33 | 0:04:36 | |
skills in this country and what we need to do is build up | 0:04:36 | 0:04:38 | |
the skills of our young people to be able to do those jobs like | 0:04:38 | 0:04:42 | |
engineering, where we do not have enough people to do those jobs. | 0:04:42 | 0:04:44 | |
-Julian Fellowes. -I think the element of immigration | 0:04:44 | 0:04:47 | |
that gets rather lost in the EU conversation is that a great | 0:04:47 | 0:04:51 | |
many of the immigrants who want to come to this country | 0:04:51 | 0:04:54 | |
are nothing to do with the EU. | 0:04:54 | 0:04:56 | |
And we don't seem to have a frightfully effective policy | 0:04:56 | 0:04:59 | |
there, even though we are not fettered by the EU laws | 0:04:59 | 0:05:02 | |
dealing with people outside. | 0:05:02 | 0:05:04 | |
We obviously need a better policy. But like everyone else here, | 0:05:04 | 0:05:09 | |
I am sure, I am very torn by this, | 0:05:09 | 0:05:11 | |
because people talk about, "They are only financial immigrants", | 0:05:11 | 0:05:14 | |
whatever the term is, | 0:05:14 | 0:05:16 | |
"They're not really persecuted, they just want a better life." | 0:05:16 | 0:05:19 | |
Well, why shouldn't they want a better life? | 0:05:19 | 0:05:21 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:05:21 | 0:05:23 | |
I don't understand that. | 0:05:25 | 0:05:27 | |
I think we obviously have to find a better balance, | 0:05:27 | 0:05:30 | |
we obviously have to find a policy, but we never | 0:05:30 | 0:05:34 | |
want to shut our doors completely. We're all agreed on that. | 0:05:34 | 0:05:37 | |
In your opinion, would one of the advantages of leaving the EU be | 0:05:37 | 0:05:42 | |
that you could get better control over immigration? | 0:05:42 | 0:05:44 | |
Is that something you'd think of as an advantage? | 0:05:44 | 0:05:47 | |
You could have obviously a better control of the EU area | 0:05:47 | 0:05:51 | |
because we would not be part of the freedom of movement. | 0:05:51 | 0:05:54 | |
Would you like to see that happen? | 0:05:54 | 0:05:55 | |
I'd like to be out, we'll get to that later, | 0:05:55 | 0:05:59 | |
but actually the immigration is not my reason. | 0:05:59 | 0:06:01 | |
Obviously you would control the borders better | 0:06:01 | 0:06:03 | |
but I think we need a better immigration policy across the board, | 0:06:03 | 0:06:06 | |
-and that is it. -The woman there. | 0:06:06 | 0:06:09 | |
-I'm sorry, but I can't accept... -Sorry, start... Yeah, go on. | 0:06:09 | 0:06:13 | |
Sorry. I was just saying I'm sorry, but I can't accept | 0:06:13 | 0:06:15 | |
Liz's argument that they are trying to remove the pull | 0:06:15 | 0:06:19 | |
factors for migrants, because what is increasing the living wage to | 0:06:19 | 0:06:23 | |
£9 in 2020 going to do? | 0:06:23 | 0:06:25 | |
Especially Eastern Europeans who have a minimum wage that's already | 0:06:25 | 0:06:28 | |
one tenth of what ours is. | 0:06:28 | 0:06:30 | |
Surely that's going to increase net migration. | 0:06:30 | 0:06:32 | |
So what would you do? Not touch the minimum wage, | 0:06:32 | 0:06:34 | |
or get out of the EU and control the borders? | 0:06:34 | 0:06:37 | |
I would get out of the EU so we could have a fair, | 0:06:37 | 0:06:39 | |
points based system, so we don't favour | 0:06:39 | 0:06:42 | |
people from outside the EU over people in the EU. | 0:06:42 | 0:06:46 | |
Because we can have someone unskilled within Europe | 0:06:46 | 0:06:49 | |
coming in without any questions, but a really talented doctor from | 0:06:49 | 0:06:53 | |
India has to go through a really intensive process. | 0:06:53 | 0:06:57 | |
-It doesn't make sense. -OK. Diane Abbott. Will you answer that? | 0:06:57 | 0:06:59 | |
Pick up her point if you would. | 0:06:59 | 0:07:02 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:07:02 | 0:07:05 | |
My parents were immigrants. | 0:07:05 | 0:07:08 | |
So the audience will forgive me if I say | 0:07:08 | 0:07:12 | |
I worry about a narrative on immigration which only stresses | 0:07:12 | 0:07:17 | |
the negatives, which... | 0:07:17 | 0:07:19 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:07:19 | 0:07:23 | |
..which is riddled with myths, | 0:07:23 | 0:07:27 | |
that immigrants just come here to sit down and live off benefits, | 0:07:27 | 0:07:31 | |
and actually panders to people, and raises expectations that you can | 0:07:31 | 0:07:36 | |
clear the streets of anyone foreign looking, | 0:07:36 | 0:07:39 | |
when in 2016, in the globalised world, it's not going to happen. | 0:07:39 | 0:07:47 | |
I was in the House of Commons this week, | 0:07:47 | 0:07:50 | |
and one of his own Conservative MPs asked David Cameron, | 0:07:50 | 0:07:54 | |
with his fiddling around with benefits, how many fewer migrants | 0:07:54 | 0:07:58 | |
will we see? He didn't answer. | 0:07:58 | 0:08:00 | |
Cameron's renegotiation is a con, it's a con, | 0:08:00 | 0:08:04 | |
it's about managing the Tory party. | 0:08:04 | 0:08:08 | |
It's all about his internal management of the Tory party. | 0:08:10 | 0:08:15 | |
There are reasons to stay in Europe, | 0:08:15 | 0:08:17 | |
there are reasons to stay out of Europe. | 0:08:17 | 0:08:20 | |
I personally am glad we're having a referendum. | 0:08:20 | 0:08:24 | |
It should be the people's referendum. It shouldn't be | 0:08:24 | 0:08:27 | |
dominated by the games they are playing in the Tory party, | 0:08:27 | 0:08:30 | |
Dave versus Boris. | 0:08:30 | 0:08:31 | |
I think we should look at the real issues, have a genuine debate. | 0:08:31 | 0:08:36 | |
It's a once-in-a-lifetime debate... | 0:08:36 | 0:08:38 | |
We know all that. | 0:08:38 | 0:08:39 | |
-All right... -Wait a minute. The question... I want to go back to the | 0:08:39 | 0:08:42 | |
question that Darrel asked, which was about immigration. | 0:08:42 | 0:08:45 | |
You know the Tory party had this plan at the last election in the | 0:08:45 | 0:08:48 | |
-manifesto to limit immigration to tens of thousands. -Yeah, but... | 0:08:48 | 0:08:51 | |
What's your opinion on the level of immigration | 0:08:51 | 0:08:54 | |
that this country should try to achieve, | 0:08:54 | 0:08:56 | |
or do you think it should be open to anybody? | 0:08:56 | 0:08:58 | |
We've never had... | 0:08:58 | 0:08:59 | |
This country's never had an open door on immigration. | 0:08:59 | 0:09:01 | |
No. What do you think? | 0:09:01 | 0:09:04 | |
-Well... -Where have you been...? | 0:09:04 | 0:09:05 | |
I've actually been in Hackney, dealing with thousands of people | 0:09:05 | 0:09:08 | |
every year trying to get their relatives | 0:09:08 | 0:09:11 | |
and their mothers and their children in. | 0:09:11 | 0:09:13 | |
That's where I've been. That's why I know we don't have | 0:09:13 | 0:09:17 | |
open door immigration. | 0:09:17 | 0:09:18 | |
I wouldn't want to give a figure. | 0:09:18 | 0:09:20 | |
I think the important thing is we have a fair immigration system, | 0:09:20 | 0:09:24 | |
an immigration system which works for our economy. | 0:09:24 | 0:09:27 | |
I don't think you can give a figure. | 0:09:27 | 0:09:29 | |
I think the Tories have got into trouble | 0:09:29 | 0:09:31 | |
putting out figures which they can't meet. | 0:09:31 | 0:09:34 | |
Julia... I'll come to you, Darrel, in a moment. Julia. | 0:09:34 | 0:09:36 | |
Before I get to the substance, can I question, Diane, | 0:09:36 | 0:09:39 | |
whether you did want us to have a referendum? | 0:09:39 | 0:09:41 | |
Because in 2011 you voted against having a referendum | 0:09:41 | 0:09:43 | |
because you don't think the British people should have a say. | 0:09:43 | 0:09:46 | |
-Is that not right? -No. -Are you sure? | 0:09:46 | 0:09:48 | |
The problem I have is we've got two politicians here, Diane Abbott | 0:09:49 | 0:09:54 | |
-who was... -Can I answer your question? | 0:09:54 | 0:09:56 | |
-Can I answer your question? -No. -You did ask it. -Yeah. -Be brief. | 0:09:56 | 0:09:59 | |
I have always argued, inside the party, | 0:09:59 | 0:10:02 | |
that we should come out for a referendum. | 0:10:02 | 0:10:04 | |
That's always been my position. | 0:10:04 | 0:10:06 | |
You voted against a referendum in 2011. | 0:10:06 | 0:10:08 | |
-I'm a loyal party member, what can I do? -You voted against... | 0:10:08 | 0:10:11 | |
Anyway. OK, we've got two politicians, Diane Abbott, | 0:10:11 | 0:10:14 | |
who was a member of the Labour Party | 0:10:14 | 0:10:17 | |
which basically had an open immigration policy with | 0:10:17 | 0:10:19 | |
the rest of Europe without ever asking the British people | 0:10:19 | 0:10:22 | |
for consent, and Liz Truss, | 0:10:22 | 0:10:24 | |
who's clearly a fully paid up member of Project Fear. | 0:10:24 | 0:10:26 | |
I don't know about you, I'm waiting for the plagues of locusts. | 0:10:26 | 0:10:29 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:10:29 | 0:10:31 | |
No-one is suggesting the choice is between an open door | 0:10:31 | 0:10:33 | |
immigration policy and no-one coming here at all. | 0:10:33 | 0:10:38 | |
What we should have is a policy that virtually every | 0:10:38 | 0:10:40 | |
country in the world has, which is that we let in people | 0:10:40 | 0:10:42 | |
that we need and want and we don't let in other people. | 0:10:42 | 0:10:46 | |
It's not complicated. Hundreds of other countries manage to do it. | 0:10:46 | 0:10:48 | |
-And it's very simple. -But... -No. Can I...? -No. Hold on a second. | 0:10:48 | 0:10:52 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:10:52 | 0:10:53 | |
To Darrel's question, do you think that can only | 0:10:55 | 0:10:57 | |
be achieved by leaving the EU? | 0:10:57 | 0:10:59 | |
Yeah, absolutely it can only be achieved by leaving the EU. | 0:10:59 | 0:11:02 | |
Certainly not the deal that David Cameron has got. | 0:11:02 | 0:11:05 | |
The idea that if we want to have free trade with Europe, | 0:11:05 | 0:11:07 | |
that we have to have an open door policy is absolute nonsense. | 0:11:07 | 0:11:10 | |
What Norway, Switzerland or other | 0:11:10 | 0:11:11 | |
smaller countries have negotiated is not the same as | 0:11:11 | 0:11:14 | |
a negotiation from the fifth biggest economy in the world. | 0:11:14 | 0:11:16 | |
The fact is, there is no other country that has | 0:11:16 | 0:11:20 | |
full access to the single market without having | 0:11:20 | 0:11:23 | |
free movement of people. | 0:11:23 | 0:11:24 | |
It was the way it was set up in the first place. | 0:11:24 | 0:11:27 | |
It was about free movement of goods, services, people and capital. | 0:11:27 | 0:11:32 | |
-That is the whole concept of the single market. -All right... | 0:11:32 | 0:11:35 | |
You're saying you can pick and choose between one element of it. | 0:11:35 | 0:11:37 | |
-Yes, you can. -You can't. | 0:11:37 | 0:11:39 | |
And the fact is that Europe exports 7% of its products to Britain... | 0:11:39 | 0:11:44 | |
-We'll come to that. -..and Britain exports 44% to Europe. | 0:11:44 | 0:11:48 | |
We'll come to that. You keep saying, "the fact is". | 0:11:48 | 0:11:50 | |
We'll come to what you think the facts are, but I want to go back to | 0:11:50 | 0:11:53 | |
the questioner before I come to Giles. | 0:11:53 | 0:11:55 | |
Darrel, what do you make of what you have heard so far? | 0:11:55 | 0:11:58 | |
I can only go from my own experiences. | 0:11:58 | 0:12:00 | |
I work in the private rented sector and I deal with letting agents. | 0:12:00 | 0:12:03 | |
One of the reason as to why rents are so high is | 0:12:03 | 0:12:06 | |
because of migration into places like Diane's Hackney, | 0:12:06 | 0:12:10 | |
where she complains about the cost of renting. | 0:12:10 | 0:12:13 | |
One of the reasons is that the demand is so high and we do not have | 0:12:13 | 0:12:17 | |
the resources to deal with it, so we need to be doing something | 0:12:17 | 0:12:19 | |
-moving forward. -And leaving the EU is your view? | 0:12:19 | 0:12:22 | |
It is one of the things that we can control, in addition to others | 0:12:22 | 0:12:25 | |
but I certainly believe that we should leave the EU. | 0:12:25 | 0:12:27 | |
-Giles Fraser, your turn. -I want to disrupt the link that you've | 0:12:27 | 0:12:31 | |
made, because I'm in favour of leaving the EU. | 0:12:31 | 0:12:35 | |
I'm a keen Brexiter. | 0:12:35 | 0:12:37 | |
I would have us have more immigration into this country | 0:12:37 | 0:12:41 | |
and not less. And that is not a popular view. | 0:12:41 | 0:12:44 | |
And the reason is at the moment because there is a humanitarian | 0:12:44 | 0:12:48 | |
crisis in the Middle East. | 0:12:48 | 0:12:51 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:12:51 | 0:12:52 | |
And it's not just about whether we need doctors and | 0:12:54 | 0:12:58 | |
engineers and professional people and what would be | 0:12:58 | 0:13:01 | |
in our advantage, and whether rents would go up and go down. | 0:13:01 | 0:13:04 | |
There are people in | 0:13:04 | 0:13:06 | |
places like Aleppo and in Syria, who are having barrel bombs | 0:13:06 | 0:13:11 | |
dropped on them, they're fleeing for their lives. | 0:13:11 | 0:13:14 | |
You and your family, me and my family, I'd be fleeing for | 0:13:14 | 0:13:16 | |
my life, and I would want there to be | 0:13:16 | 0:13:19 | |
a country that had the humanitarian principles | 0:13:19 | 0:13:21 | |
that at a time like this would open their doors. | 0:13:21 | 0:13:24 | |
Yes, it might be difficult for us. It might be. | 0:13:24 | 0:13:27 | |
But for me, there is a basic Christian principle about | 0:13:27 | 0:13:30 | |
welcoming the stranger in need, and at this time | 0:13:30 | 0:13:32 | |
I would want us to be generous, and probably more | 0:13:32 | 0:13:36 | |
generous than we feel comfortable, in order to accept | 0:13:36 | 0:13:41 | |
people who are fleeing for their lives. | 0:13:41 | 0:13:44 | |
Giles... | 0:13:44 | 0:13:46 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:13:46 | 0:13:48 | |
You make the point about Syria, but if you exclude Syria from | 0:13:49 | 0:13:53 | |
the argument, if you exclude the millions of people | 0:13:53 | 0:13:56 | |
who have left Syria for Turkey and wherever, | 0:13:56 | 0:13:59 | |
On the general point that Darrel's making about immigration | 0:13:59 | 0:14:03 | |
from the European countries, you say you want to get out of the EU. | 0:14:03 | 0:14:07 | |
They would then not have automatic access here | 0:14:07 | 0:14:10 | |
and you would approve of that? | 0:14:10 | 0:14:12 | |
The truth of the matter is, if we came out of the European Union | 0:14:12 | 0:14:16 | |
it would mean perhaps that we would have | 0:14:16 | 0:14:18 | |
greater control over our borders. | 0:14:18 | 0:14:20 | |
It does not mean we would close our borders, necessarily, | 0:14:20 | 0:14:23 | |
it means we have greater control over them. | 0:14:23 | 0:14:25 | |
It could be that we would be generous | 0:14:25 | 0:14:27 | |
with our immigration policy. | 0:14:27 | 0:14:30 | |
For me, the whole reason that I think it is right for us to | 0:14:30 | 0:14:35 | |
come out of the European Union is a basic principle of democracy, | 0:14:35 | 0:14:40 | |
is that we should be in charge of our own future. | 0:14:40 | 0:14:44 | |
And that we elect these politicians on our behalf, | 0:14:44 | 0:14:48 | |
and it is not for them to give that power away to someone else. | 0:14:48 | 0:14:53 | |
They must return it to us | 0:14:53 | 0:14:55 | |
when the election comes round again, undiminished. | 0:14:55 | 0:14:58 | |
And they shouldn't give away what is not theirs to give. | 0:14:58 | 0:15:01 | |
So it's a basic principle of democracy. | 0:15:01 | 0:15:04 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:15:04 | 0:15:06 | |
Can I just say one more thing? | 0:15:07 | 0:15:09 | |
This debate is going to be very narrow and very nasty | 0:15:09 | 0:15:13 | |
if we make the debate about Europe, | 0:15:13 | 0:15:15 | |
a once-in-a-lifetime debate, simply about immigration. | 0:15:15 | 0:15:19 | |
-That would be a huge mistake. -All right. | 0:15:19 | 0:15:22 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:15:22 | 0:15:24 | |
You, sir, at the back. | 0:15:25 | 0:15:26 | |
We're going to move on to another aspect of it because I'm aware | 0:15:26 | 0:15:30 | |
that everybody's minds are focused | 0:15:30 | 0:15:32 | |
at the moment, because of this June 23rd vote, | 0:15:32 | 0:15:34 | |
on all the aspects of the EU. | 0:15:34 | 0:15:36 | |
You, sir. We'll move on to the thing about trade in a moment. Yes. | 0:15:36 | 0:15:39 | |
I think Britain's been very generous towards immigration over the years. | 0:15:39 | 0:15:44 | |
For years and years and years. And I hope | 0:15:44 | 0:15:47 | |
we will be, to some extent. | 0:15:47 | 0:15:50 | |
But, the gentleman and Diane, | 0:15:50 | 0:15:51 | |
where are these people going to live? | 0:15:51 | 0:15:54 | |
You know. On the streets? | 0:15:54 | 0:15:57 | |
There's going to be more crime. There has to be another way. | 0:15:57 | 0:16:03 | |
We cannot keep getting flooded and flooded with immigrants. | 0:16:03 | 0:16:07 | |
Where's the infrastructure coming from? Where are they going to live? | 0:16:07 | 0:16:13 | |
-It will be like a ghetto. -Oh! That is outrageous, look... | 0:16:13 | 0:16:17 | |
-Can I...? -You go. -I say that as the son of a Polish immigrant | 0:16:17 | 0:16:20 | |
and very proud of it, too. | 0:16:20 | 0:16:22 | |
Can I just say, this narrative, which suggests that immigrants | 0:16:22 | 0:16:27 | |
are a dead weight on the economy, that they contribute nothing, that | 0:16:27 | 0:16:31 | |
-they are just a huge problem... -I didn't say that. -No, let me... | 0:16:31 | 0:16:35 | |
The country cannot be swamped. It is logic. | 0:16:35 | 0:16:39 | |
Without immigration, from the Second World War onwards, | 0:16:39 | 0:16:44 | |
we wouldn't have the National Health Service we have today. | 0:16:44 | 0:16:48 | |
I know, I wouldn't be here! | 0:16:48 | 0:16:50 | |
I don't think anyone is suggesting no immigration... | 0:16:50 | 0:16:53 | |
-No, no, I'm talking about the narrative. -We can't keep on... | 0:16:53 | 0:16:57 | |
It's a negative narrative and, in the end, it gets us nowhere. | 0:16:57 | 0:17:00 | |
What do you say to what Giles Fraser said about allowing many more people | 0:17:00 | 0:17:04 | |
in and being much more generous to people from Syria who are refugees, | 0:17:04 | 0:17:07 | |
who aren't people coming from Poland like his father, | 0:17:07 | 0:17:09 | |
but are people from the Middle East? | 0:17:09 | 0:17:11 | |
I visited, in the past few weeks, the refugee camp | 0:17:11 | 0:17:15 | |
at Calais and I visited Lesbos, | 0:17:15 | 0:17:17 | |
where Syrian refugees were also coming into, | 0:17:17 | 0:17:21 | |
and the conditions in Calais are disgusting. | 0:17:21 | 0:17:24 | |
-They are inhumane. -..let them come over to the UK - you are | 0:17:24 | 0:17:28 | |
-just spreading the problem. -I certainly... -It is all | 0:17:28 | 0:17:30 | |
very well saying, yes, we can have an open-door policy... | 0:17:30 | 0:17:34 | |
-I do... -Let her answer the question. | 0:17:34 | 0:17:37 | |
I don't think that we are taking our fair share of Syrian refugees. | 0:17:37 | 0:17:45 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:17:45 | 0:17:49 | |
These are people in desperate circumstances, | 0:17:49 | 0:17:53 | |
being exploited by people traffickers. | 0:17:53 | 0:17:56 | |
I think we should step up and take a fair share. | 0:17:56 | 0:18:00 | |
-That's the human argument. -Liz Truss? | 0:18:00 | 0:18:03 | |
It is much better to take the approach we are taking, | 0:18:03 | 0:18:07 | |
which is to have a comprehensive solution that helps people nearer | 0:18:07 | 0:18:12 | |
their home rather than attracting people to Europe into the arms of | 0:18:12 | 0:18:17 | |
the people traffickers who are killing people day after day. | 0:18:17 | 0:18:22 | |
I think it is a huge problem, | 0:18:22 | 0:18:24 | |
if we attract more migrants, refugees to Europe. | 0:18:24 | 0:18:28 | |
-What will you do about the people in Europe? -We are the second | 0:18:28 | 0:18:32 | |
biggest bilateral donor in Syria. | 0:18:32 | 0:18:34 | |
We are helping sort out the problem at source, give people homes and | 0:18:34 | 0:18:38 | |
-make sure that they have a sustainable future... -Sorry, give | 0:18:38 | 0:18:42 | |
-people homes? What homes are we giving people? -We are giving them... | 0:18:42 | 0:18:47 | |
-Tents. -Tents. -..accommodation close to Syria, | 0:18:47 | 0:18:49 | |
close to their homes, rather than them taking | 0:18:49 | 0:18:52 | |
a perilous journey, falling into the arms of the people traffickers | 0:18:52 | 0:18:57 | |
and then failing to accommodate those people in Europe. | 0:18:57 | 0:19:01 | |
-All right. -We are taking 20,000 refugees but we are doing it in an | 0:19:01 | 0:19:04 | |
organised and systematic way so people are properly accommodated | 0:19:04 | 0:19:09 | |
here in the UK, and that is the right approach. | 0:19:09 | 0:19:11 | |
Can I say, if Diane wants to help the Syrian refugees, why didn't you | 0:19:11 | 0:19:14 | |
support military action against Assad and Syria...Isis? | 0:19:14 | 0:19:17 | |
Do you really think that bombing Syria would have helped anything? | 0:19:17 | 0:19:22 | |
I think bombing Assad's forces would help, yes. | 0:19:22 | 0:19:24 | |
The woman in the fifth row? | 0:19:24 | 0:19:26 | |
I think my view is that a group of my friends, who are all nurses, have | 0:19:26 | 0:19:30 | |
been raising money for a couple of weeks and they | 0:19:30 | 0:19:33 | |
will go over to Calais this weekend to the camps, where they will | 0:19:33 | 0:19:36 | |
take with them sleeping bags, torches, medical supplies, | 0:19:36 | 0:19:40 | |
and they have done that with their own money. | 0:19:40 | 0:19:42 | |
A lot of us have sponsored them to do it. It is not just a case of who | 0:19:42 | 0:19:45 | |
is coming in, it's the fact we are turning a blind eye to these people | 0:19:45 | 0:19:49 | |
in need and we are not going out to help anyone with the exception of | 0:19:49 | 0:19:52 | |
sending warplanes over to bomb Syria. | 0:19:52 | 0:19:55 | |
Hear, hear. | 0:19:55 | 0:19:56 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:19:56 | 0:19:58 | |
OK. You, in blue, the man in blue? | 0:19:58 | 0:20:01 | |
I think the argument has got a little bit more towards | 0:20:01 | 0:20:03 | |
immigration. I think we, the British public, are quite selfish. | 0:20:03 | 0:20:07 | |
We love all the benefits of the EU without any of the disadvantages. | 0:20:07 | 0:20:11 | |
Let's face it, it is more about - it is more than just immigration. | 0:20:11 | 0:20:16 | |
Let's not forget, any of us, at any time, can go to any of these | 0:20:16 | 0:20:20 | |
countries and live there. We have many UK nationals out... | 0:20:20 | 0:20:23 | |
Absolutely right. | 0:20:23 | 0:20:25 | |
What happens to all those people when we close our borders? | 0:20:25 | 0:20:29 | |
All right. We will go on to | 0:20:29 | 0:20:31 | |
the wider aspect of jobs and the economy. Margaret Malt has a | 0:20:31 | 0:20:34 | |
question. Let's stick with Europe for the moment, Margaret Malt. | 0:20:34 | 0:20:38 | |
If we leave the EU, would there be job losses | 0:20:38 | 0:20:43 | |
and would EU trading be affected? | 0:20:43 | 0:20:45 | |
-Julia Hartley-Brewer? -Well, we have heard talk | 0:20:45 | 0:20:49 | |
of three million job losses and a complete | 0:20:49 | 0:20:53 | |
closing down of all trade from the Project Fear brigade. | 0:20:53 | 0:20:57 | |
Absolute loads of codswallop. It... | 0:20:57 | 0:20:59 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:20:59 | 0:21:02 | |
I, genuinely, I was a political editor for many years, | 0:21:05 | 0:21:08 | |
and I have honestly never heard more nonsense talked about on any subject | 0:21:08 | 0:21:12 | |
ever in my time as a political journalist. | 0:21:12 | 0:21:15 | |
I very much agree with Giles on the issue of sovereignty and democracy, | 0:21:15 | 0:21:18 | |
but I know that when it comes to voting on June 23rd, most of us will | 0:21:18 | 0:21:21 | |
be concerned about security | 0:21:21 | 0:21:22 | |
and also the economy, and are our jobs safe, | 0:21:22 | 0:21:25 | |
is our trade going to be safe? | 0:21:25 | 0:21:27 | |
We had lots of nonsense coming out last week, with letters | 0:21:27 | 0:21:31 | |
from FTSE 100 Chief Executives, 36 signed a letter saying | 0:21:31 | 0:21:35 | |
the perils of leaving the EU. | 0:21:35 | 0:21:38 | |
Of course, two-thirds of FTSE 100 Chief Executives chose | 0:21:38 | 0:21:41 | |
not to sign the letter, and a small point, | 0:21:41 | 0:21:44 | |
15 of the 36 have received EU funding and eight of the 36 | 0:21:44 | 0:21:49 | |
in 2003 warned of the perils of not joining the EU and | 0:21:49 | 0:21:54 | |
how our economy would collapse. How's that working out? | 0:21:54 | 0:21:57 | |
What do you think would happen, Julia, if the vote was Brexit? | 0:21:57 | 0:22:00 | |
How long would it take? | 0:22:00 | 0:22:01 | |
-You've seen the figures about sterling falling. -Yep. | 0:22:01 | 0:22:04 | |
In the Financial Times today, it says it will be a difficult | 0:22:04 | 0:22:08 | |
-two-year period, do you agree with that? -I think it will be a | 0:22:08 | 0:22:11 | |
difficult period, but no more difficult than any democracy when | 0:22:11 | 0:22:14 | |
they have a vote and make a decision to do something new. | 0:22:14 | 0:22:16 | |
The reality is we are not Norway, not Switzerland, not Canada, | 0:22:16 | 0:22:19 | |
we are the fifth biggest economy in the world. We will be | 0:22:19 | 0:22:22 | |
able to negotiate a deal. | 0:22:22 | 0:22:23 | |
If you seriously think that the French and the Germans will go, | 0:22:23 | 0:22:27 | |
"Right, you have knifed us in the back, we are off, we don't | 0:22:27 | 0:22:29 | |
"care any more," and Mercedes and BMW won't be in Angela Merkel's | 0:22:29 | 0:22:32 | |
office the next day saying, | 0:22:32 | 0:22:34 | |
"Are you insane? Britain is one of our biggest markets." | 0:22:34 | 0:22:37 | |
They need to trade with us as much as we need to trade with them. | 0:22:37 | 0:22:41 | |
They are not going to do us over. One final point... | 0:22:41 | 0:22:46 | |
David Cameron's argument seems to be that they will knife us in the back, | 0:22:48 | 0:22:52 | |
they will turn us over if we do that. | 0:22:52 | 0:22:55 | |
That's the same argument you give to a battered wife | 0:22:55 | 0:22:57 | |
in a domestic abusive relationship. | 0:22:57 | 0:22:59 | |
Go back to your violent husband, or he might hurt you even more. | 0:22:59 | 0:23:02 | |
If they are our friend, they will want to trade with us. | 0:23:02 | 0:23:05 | |
Actually, what the Foreign Secretary | 0:23:05 | 0:23:08 | |
said was that a Leave vote would be seen as two fingers to Europe | 0:23:08 | 0:23:12 | |
and they would give two fingers back to us and therefore... | 0:23:12 | 0:23:16 | |
And they don't want to sell us any cars, they don't want to | 0:23:16 | 0:23:19 | |
sell anything to us? 16% of goods and services sold by the EU are sold | 0:23:19 | 0:23:22 | |
-to the British people. -Ask Liz Truss. | 0:23:22 | 0:23:25 | |
I think Britain is a great country, a fantastic country. | 0:23:25 | 0:23:28 | |
Of course we could do well if we were outside the EU. I think the | 0:23:28 | 0:23:32 | |
question is, how much better can we do by staying in the EU | 0:23:32 | 0:23:37 | |
and continuing to take advantage of full access | 0:23:37 | 0:23:41 | |
to the single market? No other country has full access to goods and | 0:23:41 | 0:23:46 | |
services without being part of free movement, | 0:23:46 | 0:23:50 | |
without accepting those regulations and making sure that we | 0:23:50 | 0:23:55 | |
share the rules and the system of Europe. | 0:23:55 | 0:23:59 | |
Now, if people do want to leave, and I think it is a perfectly | 0:23:59 | 0:24:03 | |
respectable point of view, I think they have to say what | 0:24:03 | 0:24:07 | |
the alternative would look like and what the model would look like. | 0:24:07 | 0:24:10 | |
The fact is, there is a process, a two-year process, | 0:24:10 | 0:24:13 | |
where we will be in limbo as a country, we will be in a | 0:24:13 | 0:24:16 | |
twilight zone, where we are looking | 0:24:16 | 0:24:19 | |
at what the future options might look like, | 0:24:19 | 0:24:22 | |
-we... -That is not very long. -It could be longer than two years. | 0:24:22 | 0:24:26 | |
We know how long it does take to reach decisions in the EU. | 0:24:26 | 0:24:31 | |
-That is an argument for the EU, is it? -Well... | 0:24:31 | 0:24:35 | |
-It is not just... -Laughable! Laughable! | 0:24:35 | 0:24:37 | |
It's not just the EU... | 0:24:37 | 0:24:39 | |
So, let me give you one example from Defra. | 0:24:40 | 0:24:44 | |
We are still negotiating to open up the US market to British beef, | 0:24:44 | 0:24:49 | |
20 years after that market was closed due to BSE. | 0:24:49 | 0:24:53 | |
That is how long trade negotiations take. | 0:24:53 | 0:24:56 | |
So, what do you think would happen? | 0:24:56 | 0:24:58 | |
We have 53 agreements with different countries around the world through | 0:24:58 | 0:25:02 | |
the EU. Those would have to be renegotiated, the single | 0:25:02 | 0:25:06 | |
-market access would have to be renegotiated. -People know that | 0:25:06 | 0:25:10 | |
because you've said that and everybody has said that. What do you | 0:25:10 | 0:25:13 | |
think the damage of that would be? That's what's interesting. | 0:25:13 | 0:25:16 | |
How much will unemployment go up by? How much would trade fall by? | 0:25:16 | 0:25:19 | |
How much would sterling fall by? Have you done an assessment of | 0:25:19 | 0:25:22 | |
that when you come to defence of the government position? | 0:25:22 | 0:25:25 | |
The Government will be producing an assessment... | 0:25:25 | 0:25:27 | |
You haven't got it yet? | 0:25:27 | 0:25:29 | |
Not yet. There will be an economic analysis. | 0:25:29 | 0:25:32 | |
But not only will we spend our time trying to disentangle ourselves | 0:25:32 | 0:25:36 | |
from these arrangements with the EU, think of | 0:25:36 | 0:25:39 | |
all the stuff we could be doing instead. Think of what is | 0:25:39 | 0:25:41 | |
really important in terms of improving our country, raising our | 0:25:41 | 0:25:45 | |
productivity, reforming our welfare system, making sure our schools | 0:25:45 | 0:25:49 | |
are better, thinking about the Health Service. We will have the | 0:25:49 | 0:25:52 | |
entire Government machine tied up with disentangling ourselves from | 0:25:52 | 0:25:55 | |
-Europe, possibly never to get a better solution anyway. -All right. | 0:25:55 | 0:26:00 | |
If you think four months is long to talk about this, imagine what five | 0:26:00 | 0:26:04 | |
-or ten years talking about this... -So we shouldn't have had | 0:26:04 | 0:26:07 | |
-a referendum at all? -I think it is | 0:26:07 | 0:26:09 | |
right that people decide, but I know what I think is right for Britain. | 0:26:09 | 0:26:13 | |
Giles Fraser. | 0:26:13 | 0:26:15 | |
So, people say economically, it will be a leap into the dark. | 0:26:15 | 0:26:20 | |
We pay 50 million a day to the EU. | 0:26:20 | 0:26:24 | |
We get some of it back, of course, when they let us, in the way | 0:26:24 | 0:26:30 | |
they want, but in effect... | 0:26:30 | 0:26:32 | |
Sorry. Let's hit this thing on the head of 50 million. The National | 0:26:32 | 0:26:37 | |
-Audit Office figure is £15 million net of what is given back. -Hang on, | 0:26:37 | 0:26:41 | |
-I'm coming on to that. -Yes, but this quote of 50 million, it is | 0:26:41 | 0:26:45 | |
easy on the ear, but it is not accurate, is it? | 0:26:45 | 0:26:48 | |
So... We are down £11 billion a year for being in | 0:26:48 | 0:26:54 | |
-Europe. -It doesn't help your case to quote £50 billion when | 0:26:54 | 0:26:59 | |
-it is not the right figure. -It's 7 billion. | 0:26:59 | 0:27:01 | |
So we give it out and we get some back, which is | 0:27:01 | 0:27:04 | |
exactly what I said to start with. | 0:27:04 | 0:27:06 | |
But the point I'm trying to make is, that I think we would be, | 0:27:06 | 0:27:09 | |
we would be a net beneficiary financially of coming out and that | 0:27:09 | 0:27:13 | |
in itself is not a leap into the dark, that seems to be a leap into | 0:27:13 | 0:27:17 | |
what I understand to be - I won't bandy figures - | 0:27:17 | 0:27:20 | |
£11 billion-plus. That seems to be a pretty good leap into the dark... | 0:27:20 | 0:27:24 | |
-This compares... -Hang on. I'm happy to accept, let me concede the point, | 0:27:24 | 0:27:29 | |
I'm happy to accept I might be wrong about the figures. | 0:27:29 | 0:27:32 | |
I'm not bandying figures about, that's boring. | 0:27:32 | 0:27:34 | |
-Even if... -You were bandying them around. | 0:27:34 | 0:27:37 | |
That's what you were doing! | 0:27:37 | 0:27:38 | |
So, even if we are poorer, I think | 0:27:38 | 0:27:41 | |
democracy is not for sale. That is a fundamental point. Even if we | 0:27:41 | 0:27:46 | |
are a bit poorer, and the economic stuff that is going on in Europe, | 0:27:46 | 0:27:50 | |
for me the crucial stuff, how the Greek people were treated in their | 0:27:50 | 0:27:55 | |
financial crisis by the Europeans, how... | 0:27:55 | 0:27:58 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:27:58 | 0:28:02 | |
Shamelessly. How trade deals are being negotiated - TTIP - | 0:28:02 | 0:28:05 | |
in our name without us knowing | 0:28:05 | 0:28:07 | |
a single thing about what is going on. | 0:28:07 | 0:28:11 | |
This is the problem economically. | 0:28:11 | 0:28:15 | |
I don't want to nickel and dime over whether we will be a bit | 0:28:15 | 0:28:18 | |
poorer or richer, personally, | 0:28:18 | 0:28:20 | |
I don't think democracy is for sale, we should come out. | 0:28:20 | 0:28:22 | |
OK. Let's hear from the audience. You, sir, in the front row? | 0:28:22 | 0:28:26 | |
Unemployment is at a record low and the economy is one of | 0:28:28 | 0:28:31 | |
the best performing in Europe. | 0:28:31 | 0:28:33 | |
-Is that because of Europe or despite Europe? -Diane Abbott? | 0:28:33 | 0:28:37 | |
One of the... It is partly because of Europe. | 0:28:37 | 0:28:41 | |
One of the strongest arguments for | 0:28:41 | 0:28:45 | |
voting to stay in the EU is what coming out of | 0:28:45 | 0:28:49 | |
the EU would do to jobs and the economy. | 0:28:49 | 0:28:52 | |
That's why the Labour Party and all of the trade unions | 0:28:52 | 0:28:55 | |
are in favour of staying in. Julia... | 0:28:55 | 0:28:58 | |
Not all of the trade unions. | 0:28:58 | 0:29:01 | |
ASLEF and RMT are not in favour. | 0:29:01 | 0:29:04 | |
They are not manufacturing unions. My point is this. | 0:29:04 | 0:29:08 | |
They will continue to sell to us, | 0:29:08 | 0:29:10 | |
but our ability to sell to Europe could be | 0:29:10 | 0:29:15 | |
fatally hampered by tariffs and a tariff war. | 0:29:15 | 0:29:20 | |
The other point is this. There is a great deal of manufacturing | 0:29:20 | 0:29:24 | |
in this country, car manufacturers to begin with. | 0:29:24 | 0:29:28 | |
Those manufacturers from Japan and so on are only here | 0:29:28 | 0:29:32 | |
because we are within the EU. There are financial services | 0:29:32 | 0:29:36 | |
companies that are only in London because we are within the EU. | 0:29:36 | 0:29:39 | |
I think there are two problems. | 0:29:39 | 0:29:41 | |
One - our goods would face a tariff fall, | 0:29:41 | 0:29:44 | |
and the other - that bit by bit, the headquarters of firms that have | 0:29:44 | 0:29:48 | |
only come here because we're in the EU would relocate to the Continent. | 0:29:48 | 0:29:53 | |
Julian, I'm going to come to you, | 0:29:53 | 0:29:54 | |
but I'd like to hear from some members of the audience before I do. | 0:29:54 | 0:29:57 | |
The woman over there, and then | 0:29:57 | 0:29:59 | |
I'll come to you, sir, in the pink shirt. Yes? | 0:29:59 | 0:30:01 | |
It's OK with the EU market, | 0:30:01 | 0:30:03 | |
but surely our biggest price we have to pay is our safety. | 0:30:03 | 0:30:06 | |
We've been letting in terrorists willy-nilly | 0:30:06 | 0:30:08 | |
without actually checking them through, | 0:30:08 | 0:30:10 | |
so what's the excuse? That's what I want to know. | 0:30:10 | 0:30:12 | |
-So, terrorism is what do you think is the major issue? -Yeah, it is. | 0:30:12 | 0:30:15 | |
Because our safety... It's all right staying in the EU market, | 0:30:15 | 0:30:18 | |
but how many are we letting through through the EU? | 0:30:18 | 0:30:21 | |
OK, and you, sir, in the pink shirt. | 0:30:21 | 0:30:24 | |
There are many people that trade | 0:30:24 | 0:30:25 | |
with the EU that are not in the EU. Countries like China. | 0:30:25 | 0:30:28 | |
-Yes. Funnily enough. -They pay tariffs. | 0:30:28 | 0:30:32 | |
We don't have to be in the EU to trade with the EU. | 0:30:34 | 0:30:37 | |
But they have to pay tariffs. | 0:30:37 | 0:30:39 | |
But you would have to pay a higher tariff. | 0:30:39 | 0:30:42 | |
And they don't have access to the services market, | 0:30:42 | 0:30:44 | |
which is really important. | 0:30:44 | 0:30:46 | |
Two thirds of our economy is services, | 0:30:46 | 0:30:48 | |
and they don't have access to that. | 0:30:48 | 0:30:51 | |
Isn't it amazing that only four of the G20 countries are in the EU, | 0:30:51 | 0:30:54 | |
and yet somehow manage to survive. I wonder how they do that? | 0:30:54 | 0:30:58 | |
The man there. Yes, you, sir, with the brown pullover on. | 0:30:59 | 0:31:05 | |
You all keep saying that the referendum... | 0:31:05 | 0:31:08 | |
There needs to be a referendum because the people need to decide. | 0:31:08 | 0:31:11 | |
But I was just wondering, | 0:31:11 | 0:31:13 | |
with everyone throwing these facts around like 50 billion figure | 0:31:13 | 0:31:16 | |
for political point scoring, | 0:31:16 | 0:31:18 | |
how are the British people supposed to decide | 0:31:18 | 0:31:20 | |
when they haven't got the right information? | 0:31:20 | 0:31:23 | |
Well, and it goes to the heart of it, | 0:31:23 | 0:31:26 | |
because a lot of people say give us the facts, | 0:31:26 | 0:31:29 | |
tell us what the consequences of one thing or the other would be. | 0:31:29 | 0:31:33 | |
Julian Fellowes, how do you think people should survive? | 0:31:33 | 0:31:35 | |
I'll come to you later. | 0:31:35 | 0:31:36 | |
I don't really think whether | 0:31:36 | 0:31:38 | |
we should stay in or get out is a financial argument. | 0:31:38 | 0:31:42 | |
I agree that it is a complete fantasy to think that | 0:31:42 | 0:31:45 | |
the car manufacturers of Germany | 0:31:45 | 0:31:47 | |
and the wine growers of France are suddenly going to | 0:31:47 | 0:31:50 | |
turn their back on one of their best markets | 0:31:50 | 0:31:52 | |
because we're supposed to have made a V sign at them. | 0:31:52 | 0:31:55 | |
I've worked all my life in a business | 0:31:55 | 0:31:57 | |
where everyone makes a V sign at you every morning | 0:31:57 | 0:31:59 | |
and you then get on with the business at hand. | 0:31:59 | 0:32:02 | |
It is just nonsense to think that. | 0:32:02 | 0:32:04 | |
We also will have unfettered access to all sorts of other world markets | 0:32:04 | 0:32:08 | |
and expand in different ways. | 0:32:08 | 0:32:11 | |
I would be very surprised if there was really | 0:32:11 | 0:32:14 | |
much difference in it at all. | 0:32:14 | 0:32:16 | |
I love being European. I love Europe. | 0:32:16 | 0:32:18 | |
I think it's great, and I think if we do come out, | 0:32:18 | 0:32:21 | |
the first thing we should do is try to make as good arrangements | 0:32:21 | 0:32:24 | |
with everyone, be pals with everyone, set up everything. | 0:32:24 | 0:32:28 | |
I've been told, "We'll pay almost as much money | 0:32:28 | 0:32:30 | |
"if we want to go on trading." | 0:32:30 | 0:32:32 | |
Well, let's do the sums, and if they work let's pay it. That's all fine. | 0:32:32 | 0:32:36 | |
But we won't have to live under rules | 0:32:36 | 0:32:39 | |
-we have not wanted or asked for or voted for. -Hear, hear. | 0:32:39 | 0:32:42 | |
Yes. The woman in the very back there. | 0:32:50 | 0:32:52 | |
Yeah, I'm as confused as anybody here. | 0:32:52 | 0:32:54 | |
I agree with the young girl over there. | 0:32:54 | 0:32:57 | |
I just can't make my mind up whether we stay in Europe or whether we go. | 0:32:57 | 0:33:02 | |
Where's this assessment coming from, Liz? | 0:33:02 | 0:33:04 | |
When are we going to see it so that we can make this informed decision? | 0:33:04 | 0:33:07 | |
Is it going to be a week before the referendum? | 0:33:07 | 0:33:09 | |
-A week after? -The week after? | 0:33:09 | 0:33:12 | |
There is going to be an assessment produced | 0:33:14 | 0:33:17 | |
and also a look at the alternative models. | 0:33:17 | 0:33:20 | |
And that will be produced fairly shortly. | 0:33:20 | 0:33:23 | |
But I think it is clear that if you look at the exit process, | 0:33:23 | 0:33:28 | |
there will be two years of uncertainty, | 0:33:28 | 0:33:31 | |
and if you look at the access to the European single market, | 0:33:31 | 0:33:36 | |
including services, which represents two thirds of the UK economy, | 0:33:36 | 0:33:40 | |
no other country has access to that market without having to | 0:33:40 | 0:33:44 | |
follow the rules, and we are part of making rules. | 0:33:44 | 0:33:47 | |
I know some of the rules are frustrating. | 0:33:47 | 0:33:49 | |
I couldn't agree with you more, Julian. | 0:33:49 | 0:33:50 | |
As Defra Secretary, I have to deal with them every day. | 0:33:50 | 0:33:53 | |
But the fact is, if we want export our lamb to Europe, | 0:33:53 | 0:33:56 | |
and we export 38% of all the lamb we produce to Europe, | 0:33:56 | 0:34:00 | |
we will have to follow those rules anyway. And that is the problem. | 0:34:00 | 0:34:03 | |
You know, the question is, do we be part of it | 0:34:03 | 0:34:06 | |
and help come up with the rules, | 0:34:06 | 0:34:09 | |
or do we have to follow the rules anyway because it is our closest | 0:34:09 | 0:34:12 | |
market to us, we are geographically located next to Europe? | 0:34:12 | 0:34:16 | |
Just come back to this assessment thing you keep talking about | 0:34:16 | 0:34:19 | |
that's going to come out, for some reason isn't ready yet. | 0:34:19 | 0:34:23 | |
But it is going to come out. | 0:34:23 | 0:34:24 | |
Given that the Government has said that civil servants can't | 0:34:24 | 0:34:28 | |
brief people who are against staying in the EU, | 0:34:28 | 0:34:31 | |
can only brief ministers who are in favour, | 0:34:31 | 0:34:34 | |
is anybody going to trust this assessment? | 0:34:34 | 0:34:37 | |
The Government is parti pris. The Prime Minister has said | 0:34:37 | 0:34:39 | |
they are going to stay in. APPLAUSE | 0:34:39 | 0:34:42 | |
David, we have an impartial civil service, which is responsible... | 0:34:42 | 0:34:49 | |
Why aren't they allowed to advise the people who want to exit? | 0:34:49 | 0:34:52 | |
They are able to provide facts, | 0:34:52 | 0:34:55 | |
they are able to provide facts to all ministers, | 0:34:55 | 0:34:58 | |
regardless of whether those ministers have taken the decision | 0:34:58 | 0:35:02 | |
that they want to leave the official Government position and leave. | 0:35:02 | 0:35:05 | |
-No, they are not. -They are able to provide facts. | 0:35:05 | 0:35:07 | |
But Heywood specifically forbade giving information to people | 0:35:07 | 0:35:11 | |
who were in favour of coming out. | 0:35:11 | 0:35:13 | |
I mean, that is what we are told in the papers, anyway. | 0:35:13 | 0:35:15 | |
I can assure you, Julian, | 0:35:15 | 0:35:17 | |
in Defra we have ministers of both sets of opinions, | 0:35:17 | 0:35:20 | |
and all ministers are provided with the facts by the civil servants, | 0:35:20 | 0:35:24 | |
and civil servants are impartial. | 0:35:24 | 0:35:27 | |
They are not allowed to take sides in this debate. | 0:35:27 | 0:35:29 | |
Does that include the civil servant who wrote to | 0:35:29 | 0:35:31 | |
the FTSE 100 companies asking them | 0:35:31 | 0:35:33 | |
to sign that letter supporting staying in? | 0:35:33 | 0:35:35 | |
LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE | 0:35:35 | 0:35:38 | |
-I think... -Yes, you. | 0:35:38 | 0:35:41 | |
My major concern here is we've got two politicians on the panel | 0:35:41 | 0:35:45 | |
and we've got our politicians... | 0:35:45 | 0:35:48 | |
We voted for them, | 0:35:48 | 0:35:51 | |
and yet they want to be subservient to the European Union. | 0:35:51 | 0:35:55 | |
And I'm just concerned that they are second-rate politicians | 0:35:55 | 0:36:02 | |
being lorded over by the European Parliament. | 0:36:02 | 0:36:04 | |
-That's a bit harsh! -Can I say - we live in an interconnected world. | 0:36:04 | 0:36:09 | |
We are members of Nato, we are members of the WTO, we are | 0:36:09 | 0:36:14 | |
members of the European Union. | 0:36:14 | 0:36:15 | |
We have to work with other countries to get things done. | 0:36:15 | 0:36:18 | |
We do not invite second-rate politicians | 0:36:18 | 0:36:20 | |
onto the Question Time panel. | 0:36:20 | 0:36:22 | |
-We only invite... -Thanks, David. -We only invite the first rank. | 0:36:22 | 0:36:27 | |
You're being dictated to by the European Parliament. | 0:36:27 | 0:36:29 | |
You may disagree with them, | 0:36:29 | 0:36:30 | |
but they are the first rank of politicians that are on offer. | 0:36:30 | 0:36:33 | |
LAUGHTER I put that caveat in. | 0:36:33 | 0:36:35 | |
Why aren't they fighting for us, then, | 0:36:35 | 0:36:37 | |
against the European Parliament? | 0:36:37 | 0:36:39 | |
But the question is, do we stay in Europe | 0:36:39 | 0:36:41 | |
and fight for the rules that we want, or do we leave it... | 0:36:41 | 0:36:44 | |
But you are not! You're not doing it. | 0:36:44 | 0:36:45 | |
..and end up having to follow those rules | 0:36:45 | 0:36:47 | |
because we want to do trade with that market? | 0:36:47 | 0:36:49 | |
You can still trade with it. | 0:36:49 | 0:36:51 | |
We're members of organisations like Nato, the WTO - | 0:36:51 | 0:36:53 | |
we have to work with other countries to get things done. | 0:36:53 | 0:36:56 | |
That's what politics is about. | 0:36:56 | 0:36:59 | |
I must say, my favourite part of Project Fear is that we should all | 0:36:59 | 0:37:03 | |
vote to stay in because otherwise we won't get cheap flights. | 0:37:03 | 0:37:08 | |
The idea that whether or not you can fly on Queasy Jet should | 0:37:08 | 0:37:12 | |
decide the future of this country is rather extraordinary to me. | 0:37:12 | 0:37:16 | |
The woman in blue, there. You. | 0:37:16 | 0:37:18 | |
Am I the only person here who has | 0:37:18 | 0:37:20 | |
a member of the economic Parliament... European Parliament? | 0:37:20 | 0:37:24 | |
Cos we do have people who represent us in Europe. | 0:37:24 | 0:37:27 | |
They haven't just made decisions about us. | 0:37:27 | 0:37:30 | |
We have actually voted for people who represent us in Europe. | 0:37:30 | 0:37:34 | |
Those powers have been given away by our politicians to other | 0:37:34 | 0:37:37 | |
politicians in other countries and unelected bureaucrats. | 0:37:37 | 0:37:40 | |
Are you telling me they don't represent our views from Britain? | 0:37:40 | 0:37:43 | |
Are you telling me that the people that we pay for | 0:37:43 | 0:37:45 | |
to represent us in Europe, | 0:37:45 | 0:37:47 | |
that they are not representing our views? | 0:37:47 | 0:37:49 | |
Well, then, let's put them up to account, | 0:37:49 | 0:37:51 | |
cos if I was a teacher not doing my job, I'd be out of a job. | 0:37:51 | 0:37:54 | |
-Julia? -The point is that we have only a tiny say of what | 0:37:54 | 0:37:58 | |
happens in the European Parliament and a tiny say of what | 0:37:58 | 0:38:01 | |
happens in the European Council and European Commission. | 0:38:01 | 0:38:03 | |
-And we are repeatedly voted down. I think 70 cases... -72. | 0:38:03 | 0:38:06 | |
-72 since 2010 where David Cameron has... -We lost 72. | 0:38:06 | 0:38:09 | |
Yes, we lost all 72. The reality is... | 0:38:09 | 0:38:11 | |
Of course we have to compromise, of course we have to do deals, | 0:38:11 | 0:38:14 | |
and we do that in Nato, we do that with the World Trade Organisation, | 0:38:14 | 0:38:17 | |
we do that with lots of bodies. | 0:38:17 | 0:38:18 | |
We don't give away our sovereignty to do so. | 0:38:18 | 0:38:21 | |
Can I just...? Can I ask whether...? | 0:38:21 | 0:38:25 | |
Can I just ask a question? I know this is a political audience, | 0:38:25 | 0:38:29 | |
but I'd love to know how many people here know the name of their MEP. | 0:38:29 | 0:38:32 | |
How many people here know the name of their MEP? | 0:38:32 | 0:38:34 | |
-If they don't know... I'm not going to test them all. -Really? | 0:38:34 | 0:38:38 | |
That's actually rather important. | 0:38:38 | 0:38:40 | |
-You don't know, David. You don't know their names. -All right. | 0:38:40 | 0:38:42 | |
Just hands up if you know the name of your MEP. | 0:38:42 | 0:38:44 | |
-You do, sir. Who is he or she? -Clare Moody. | 0:38:44 | 0:38:47 | |
-Right, what area is that? -MEP for the South West. | 0:38:47 | 0:38:50 | |
We've got about 20 hands up in the whole big audience. | 0:38:50 | 0:38:52 | |
-That really says something. -Let's go onto another question. | 0:38:52 | 0:38:55 | |
We won't leave the EU for the moment. | 0:38:55 | 0:38:58 | |
But just before we go to it, since we've been 40 minutes on this, | 0:38:58 | 0:39:01 | |
a reminder about where we're going to be next week. | 0:39:01 | 0:39:04 | |
We are in Liverpool. And the week after that, we are in Dundee. | 0:39:04 | 0:39:07 | |
And you can apply either by telephone or to our website. | 0:39:07 | 0:39:10 | |
Let's go to the harsh politics of this, | 0:39:10 | 0:39:12 | |
and have this question from Harrison Taylor, please. | 0:39:12 | 0:39:15 | |
Will Boris Johnson be a vote winner in the EU referendum? | 0:39:15 | 0:39:20 | |
Will Boris Johnson, who has come out as an Out, | 0:39:20 | 0:39:23 | |
will he... Is he persuasive? Giles Fraser? | 0:39:23 | 0:39:25 | |
I did actually think when the Prime Minister | 0:39:25 | 0:39:28 | |
was having a go at Jeremy Corbyn | 0:39:28 | 0:39:30 | |
for doing up his tie and putting his jacket on, | 0:39:30 | 0:39:33 | |
I half thought for a minute he was actually having | 0:39:33 | 0:39:35 | |
a go at Boris about that, and not just Jeremy Corbyn. | 0:39:35 | 0:39:40 | |
I imagine Boris sings the national anthem, | 0:39:40 | 0:39:44 | |
-which was the last part of the barb against Corbyn. -Here's the thing. | 0:39:44 | 0:39:47 | |
I quite like the fact we are having a debate about this, | 0:39:47 | 0:39:50 | |
that the Tories are having a debate about this. | 0:39:50 | 0:39:52 | |
I quite like the fact that you're having unusual alliances | 0:39:52 | 0:39:56 | |
and that actually, there's a proper debate going on. | 0:39:56 | 0:39:59 | |
I actually wish there was more | 0:39:59 | 0:40:01 | |
of a debate in the Labour Party about this going on. | 0:40:01 | 0:40:03 | |
I think the Labour Party are slightly absent from the field. | 0:40:03 | 0:40:06 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:40:06 | 0:40:08 | |
And I wish they would get stuck in more. | 0:40:08 | 0:40:12 | |
And I quite like the fact that you have a Boris | 0:40:12 | 0:40:15 | |
and the others arguing with each other. | 0:40:15 | 0:40:18 | |
I think that is just what we want in our democracy, | 0:40:18 | 0:40:21 | |
having a proper debate where there aren't any obvious sides any more. | 0:40:21 | 0:40:25 | |
This is too important an issue | 0:40:25 | 0:40:27 | |
for it to become one of those tribal playpen issues. | 0:40:27 | 0:40:30 | |
So really, really good that we have all different people arguing | 0:40:30 | 0:40:33 | |
with each other, a kaleidoscope which is being shaken up, | 0:40:33 | 0:40:37 | |
and I think we should all think afresh and anew about this subject. | 0:40:37 | 0:40:42 | |
And it is really good to see | 0:40:42 | 0:40:44 | |
politicians breaking the mould about where they stand. | 0:40:44 | 0:40:47 | |
Why do you think Labour is not arguing about it | 0:40:47 | 0:40:49 | |
in the way that you would like? | 0:40:49 | 0:40:52 | |
The Labour Party used to have a good tradition of Euroscepticism, | 0:40:52 | 0:40:56 | |
with heroes of mine like Tony Benn, and I think probably through | 0:40:56 | 0:41:01 | |
the Tony Blair period onwards that got squashed out of them. | 0:41:01 | 0:41:06 | |
And now I suspect Mr Corbyn, in his heart of hearts, | 0:41:06 | 0:41:10 | |
is very ambivalent about Europe. | 0:41:10 | 0:41:13 | |
I suspect Diane is secretly pretty ambivalent about Europe, really. | 0:41:13 | 0:41:17 | |
But they are not really allowed to say so. | 0:41:17 | 0:41:20 | |
She is smiling a very saturnine kind of smile here beside you. | 0:41:20 | 0:41:23 | |
And I wish they'd say so more. | 0:41:23 | 0:41:25 | |
Can we just unleash the Labour Party to have a proper debate on this? | 0:41:25 | 0:41:29 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:41:29 | 0:41:31 | |
Diane? | 0:41:31 | 0:41:33 | |
You have the freedom of the airwaves offered you by Giles | 0:41:33 | 0:41:36 | |
to unleash your inner self. | 0:41:36 | 0:41:38 | |
That's very tempting, Giles, but not this minute. | 0:41:38 | 0:41:43 | |
I sincerely hope this referendum isn't decided as to whether | 0:41:43 | 0:41:47 | |
people like Boris or not, | 0:41:47 | 0:41:50 | |
just as I hope that we don't confuse the issue of Europe with | 0:41:50 | 0:41:54 | |
the issue of the immigration, | 0:41:54 | 0:41:55 | |
because Julian made a very good point that some of the people that | 0:41:55 | 0:41:58 | |
many people regard as immigrants are not from Europe at all. | 0:41:58 | 0:42:01 | |
Just as I hope... | 0:42:01 | 0:42:02 | |
Somebody said, a couple of people said, and they were right, | 0:42:02 | 0:42:05 | |
figures, going backwards and forwards... | 0:42:05 | 0:42:07 | |
I think we need a debate on first principles. | 0:42:07 | 0:42:11 | |
And one of the principles is that this is 2015... | 0:42:11 | 0:42:16 | |
16! | 0:42:16 | 0:42:17 | |
LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE | 0:42:17 | 0:42:21 | |
-One of the principles is... -Typical Labour, stuck in the past. | 0:42:21 | 0:42:24 | |
Only a year. | 0:42:24 | 0:42:27 | |
But my point is a real one. | 0:42:27 | 0:42:29 | |
There are so many things that are issues to us now | 0:42:29 | 0:42:34 | |
in the 21st century that are better addressed working with | 0:42:34 | 0:42:39 | |
other European countries, whether it is climate change, | 0:42:39 | 0:42:42 | |
whether it is this whole refugee crisis we are facing in Europe. | 0:42:42 | 0:42:46 | |
The idea that we're going to retreat into ourselves, you know, | 0:42:46 | 0:42:50 | |
in the 21st century, must be wrong. | 0:42:50 | 0:42:52 | |
You talked about where the Labour Party is. | 0:42:52 | 0:42:55 | |
The point to stress is the Labour Party has | 0:42:55 | 0:42:59 | |
a very different vision of Europe. | 0:42:59 | 0:43:02 | |
Jeremy Corbyn has a very different vision from David Cameron. | 0:43:02 | 0:43:05 | |
David Cameron went and was battling to preserve bankers' bonuses. | 0:43:05 | 0:43:09 | |
He was negotiating this totally fraudulent stuff | 0:43:09 | 0:43:12 | |
about benefits and immigration. | 0:43:12 | 0:43:13 | |
We want a Europe that is a social Europe, | 0:43:13 | 0:43:16 | |
that will protect workers, protect workers' rights, | 0:43:16 | 0:43:20 | |
that will fight climate change. We want a social Europe, | 0:43:20 | 0:43:24 | |
but we believe that in the 21st century it must make | 0:43:24 | 0:43:28 | |
more sense to come together | 0:43:28 | 0:43:30 | |
with our European neighbours than to retreat into some sort of bastion. | 0:43:30 | 0:43:36 | |
-Have you changed your view on this in your time in politics? -On Europe? | 0:43:36 | 0:43:40 | |
-Yes. -I've always been a sceptic about the eurozone. | 0:43:40 | 0:43:45 | |
-And I think I've been proved right. The problem... -About the EU. -No, no. | 0:43:45 | 0:43:51 | |
I've always been pro-Europe. | 0:43:51 | 0:43:53 | |
But I was always sceptical about the economic aspects of it | 0:43:53 | 0:43:56 | |
cos there wasn't genuine convergence between the economies, | 0:43:56 | 0:43:59 | |
and we've seen what happened to Greece. | 0:43:59 | 0:44:01 | |
The woman there on the left. | 0:44:01 | 0:44:03 | |
Yes, I was a little concerned about Julia saying something | 0:44:03 | 0:44:05 | |
related to we will choose who we want and what we need, | 0:44:05 | 0:44:09 | |
and I think that is a little bit dangerous, choosing people that way. | 0:44:09 | 0:44:13 | |
But the issue with the referendum, I think it's a disgrace | 0:44:13 | 0:44:15 | |
to have the Prime Minister forcing this, | 0:44:15 | 0:44:19 | |
going to Brussels, demanding something that I think | 0:44:19 | 0:44:22 | |
Ukip forced him into when it's not really about that. | 0:44:22 | 0:44:26 | |
It's fine to have the discussion about something like this, | 0:44:26 | 0:44:29 | |
but there are so many different facets of this, | 0:44:29 | 0:44:32 | |
and really it is not even going to address the issue. | 0:44:32 | 0:44:36 | |
And I think having a referendum costing | 0:44:36 | 0:44:39 | |
so much for people to go and vote and do all the polling, | 0:44:39 | 0:44:42 | |
I think it is a disgrace to spend | 0:44:42 | 0:44:43 | |
so much money on an issue that really isn't a real issue. | 0:44:43 | 0:44:48 | |
Why is it not a real issue? | 0:44:48 | 0:44:49 | |
-It's about the Tory party! -Because it's not really about | 0:44:49 | 0:44:53 | |
what he's pushing. Everyone is saying something different. | 0:44:53 | 0:44:56 | |
Is it really about staying | 0:44:56 | 0:44:58 | |
in Europe, or is it about being part of | 0:44:58 | 0:45:01 | |
a party that believes in the same thing? | 0:45:01 | 0:45:03 | |
Even his frontbenchers don't even agree or support him. | 0:45:03 | 0:45:06 | |
What do you think it is about? | 0:45:06 | 0:45:08 | |
I don't think it's about... I think Ukip forced him into a decision... | 0:45:08 | 0:45:11 | |
The British people demanded it. Democracy costs money. | 0:45:11 | 0:45:14 | |
We can have a totalitarian state and not bother. | 0:45:14 | 0:45:16 | |
The British people demanded it or the Conservative Party? | 0:45:16 | 0:45:19 | |
-The British people demanded it. -What was the evidence? | 0:45:19 | 0:45:21 | |
It was quite clear at the time, the polling, again and again, | 0:45:21 | 0:45:24 | |
the British people at the election before had been promised a referendum and were not given it. | 0:45:24 | 0:45:28 | |
The British people demanded it, and it was clear that yes, | 0:45:28 | 0:45:30 | |
of course, the Tories would haemorrhage votes to Ukip | 0:45:30 | 0:45:33 | |
if they did not give it. That is democracy in action. | 0:45:33 | 0:45:35 | |
We can have a totalitarian state and not have these expensive elections | 0:45:35 | 0:45:38 | |
if you prefer, but some of us quite like the chance to vote. | 0:45:38 | 0:45:41 | |
All right. Julian. | 0:45:41 | 0:45:42 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:45:42 | 0:45:44 | |
To, um... | 0:45:44 | 0:45:46 | |
..to go back to the actual question about Boris, | 0:45:47 | 0:45:51 | |
the one thing I hate about this, | 0:45:51 | 0:45:54 | |
I really dislike it, is being at odds with | 0:45:54 | 0:45:58 | |
the Prime Minister, a man I admire very, very much. | 0:45:58 | 0:46:01 | |
I don't agree with Diane that he was footling around in his negotiations. | 0:46:01 | 0:46:07 | |
I think he did extremely well and I doubt anyone could have done better. | 0:46:07 | 0:46:11 | |
It is the organisation he was wrestling with | 0:46:11 | 0:46:14 | |
that I have my doubts about, not about him. | 0:46:14 | 0:46:17 | |
And I think, where it is helpful | 0:46:17 | 0:46:19 | |
for Michael Gove, and for Boris Johnson, and so on, | 0:46:19 | 0:46:23 | |
to come on to the Out team, is it allows us | 0:46:23 | 0:46:25 | |
to see, this is a genuine thing where all sorts of | 0:46:25 | 0:46:29 | |
people can be split, where we all have all | 0:46:29 | 0:46:32 | |
political beliefs on one side and the other, | 0:46:32 | 0:46:34 | |
where this is a different question to the ones normally. | 0:46:34 | 0:46:39 | |
And, after it is done, after the referendum | 0:46:39 | 0:46:41 | |
is finished, we must then re-bond, we must bring | 0:46:41 | 0:46:45 | |
ourselves back together, | 0:46:45 | 0:46:47 | |
and I think it helpful, just as | 0:46:47 | 0:46:48 | |
I would find it very helpful if any of | 0:46:48 | 0:46:51 | |
the Labour heavyweights would come into the Out campaign, | 0:46:51 | 0:46:54 | |
then you would have a real sense of the fact | 0:46:54 | 0:46:57 | |
that this is a sort of almost equal discussion | 0:46:57 | 0:47:00 | |
that we have to have, so I think it is helpful. | 0:47:00 | 0:47:03 | |
Whether Boris himself persuades people to join it, | 0:47:03 | 0:47:06 | |
you know, obviously I hope he does because | 0:47:06 | 0:47:09 | |
that's my team, but we will have to see. | 0:47:09 | 0:47:12 | |
I think it makes the Out argument and the In argument feel fairly | 0:47:12 | 0:47:16 | |
equally balanced, which can only be a good thing. | 0:47:16 | 0:47:19 | |
-But, Julian, do you really think... -APPLAUSE | 0:47:19 | 0:47:21 | |
..do you really think, that when this is over, | 0:47:21 | 0:47:25 | |
-the Conservative Party will be able to re-bond? -Yes. | 0:47:25 | 0:47:28 | |
-All right... -Because I know that all political parties have | 0:47:28 | 0:47:32 | |
had to go through these very difficult schisms, | 0:47:32 | 0:47:35 | |
and then you have to get over it. | 0:47:35 | 0:47:37 | |
It's like a family. "I will never speak to you again," | 0:47:37 | 0:47:40 | |
you say as you flounce out and slam the door, | 0:47:40 | 0:47:43 | |
and, sure enough, by Christmas, there you are. | 0:47:43 | 0:47:46 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:47:46 | 0:47:48 | |
You know. And that'll be that. | 0:47:48 | 0:47:50 | |
You don't even have to wait till Christmas, | 0:47:50 | 0:47:52 | |
you wait for the next episode on the following Sunday! | 0:47:52 | 0:47:55 | |
Liz Truss, let's just come to sovereignty, | 0:47:55 | 0:47:57 | |
which Julian has been talking about. | 0:47:57 | 0:48:00 | |
Michael Gove, the Justice Secretary, | 0:48:00 | 0:48:02 | |
who we know thinks the thing won't hang together legally anyway, | 0:48:02 | 0:48:06 | |
said that every single day, every single minister is told, | 0:48:06 | 0:48:09 | |
"Yes, Minister," you are a minister, | 0:48:09 | 0:48:11 | |
"Yes, I understand that, I am afraid it is against EU rules." | 0:48:11 | 0:48:14 | |
"I know, my colleagues in Government know, it happens all the time." | 0:48:14 | 0:48:18 | |
When he wants sovereignty restored, | 0:48:18 | 0:48:20 | |
isn't he right to say you are suffering all the time in your | 0:48:20 | 0:48:24 | |
position at Defra, from rules that you don't have any... | 0:48:24 | 0:48:27 | |
We have talked about whether the European Parliament has anything.... | 0:48:27 | 0:48:30 | |
things that you have no direct effect over? | 0:48:30 | 0:48:33 | |
It does vary from government department to government department, | 0:48:33 | 0:48:36 | |
so, at Education, I never experienced that. | 0:48:36 | 0:48:39 | |
In my two years there, there was never a moment where EU rules | 0:48:39 | 0:48:43 | |
affected what we do. | 0:48:43 | 0:48:44 | |
And, actually, I think education is incredibly important | 0:48:44 | 0:48:47 | |
and we have got to think about | 0:48:47 | 0:48:49 | |
all the things that we do have total say over | 0:48:49 | 0:48:52 | |
that would get neglected if we spent five years | 0:48:52 | 0:48:55 | |
renegotiating or negotiating our exit | 0:48:55 | 0:48:59 | |
from the EU. I think that is very important. | 0:48:59 | 0:49:01 | |
Now, at Defra, I do have a lot more involvement with the EU... | 0:49:01 | 0:49:04 | |
Just go back to education, Gove was your superior minister at Education. | 0:49:04 | 0:49:07 | |
-He was, yes. -Was he right or wrong to say what he said? | 0:49:07 | 0:49:10 | |
You said the opposite of what he says. | 0:49:10 | 0:49:12 | |
In the particular role that I did, which was on schools and childcare, | 0:49:12 | 0:49:15 | |
I didn't come across the EU in what I did. | 0:49:15 | 0:49:18 | |
Did you hear Michael Gove complaining at that time | 0:49:18 | 0:49:20 | |
about the way the EU interfered? | 0:49:20 | 0:49:22 | |
Well, he is somebody who is very passionate about the EU, | 0:49:22 | 0:49:25 | |
so of course he talks about the issue a lot. | 0:49:25 | 0:49:28 | |
I think, what I would say is that when you look at | 0:49:28 | 0:49:31 | |
our key domestic policies, | 0:49:31 | 0:49:33 | |
what we need to do to improve productivity, | 0:49:33 | 0:49:35 | |
whether it is reforming our welfare system, | 0:49:35 | 0:49:37 | |
reforming our education system, our fiscal policy, | 0:49:37 | 0:49:41 | |
and David Cameron has made sure we are protected | 0:49:41 | 0:49:43 | |
from the eurozone in terms of our monetary policy. | 0:49:43 | 0:49:46 | |
Gordon Brown did that. | 0:49:46 | 0:49:48 | |
-When you look at all... -Gordon Brown was the person | 0:49:48 | 0:49:50 | |
that kept us out of the eurozone. | 0:49:50 | 0:49:52 | |
I do agree with Diane, that Gordon Brown did contribute to | 0:49:52 | 0:49:55 | |
staying out of the euro, which was a very good thing. | 0:49:55 | 0:49:58 | |
Come back to Defra, the bit you know and are working in now. | 0:49:58 | 0:50:02 | |
So, Defra does have a lot of rules from the EU, | 0:50:02 | 0:50:05 | |
and we are part of those discussions and negotiations... | 0:50:05 | 0:50:08 | |
Irritating to you, difficult to you? | 0:50:08 | 0:50:10 | |
They are irritating, and they are difficult... | 0:50:10 | 0:50:12 | |
You would rather be Out, then, and have your own... | 0:50:12 | 0:50:14 | |
..and we have those discussions. | 0:50:14 | 0:50:16 | |
My view is, that the cost of doing that, | 0:50:16 | 0:50:19 | |
the cost of being part of those regulations | 0:50:19 | 0:50:22 | |
and having those discussions, | 0:50:22 | 0:50:24 | |
is worth the huge benefits we have from being in that market. | 0:50:24 | 0:50:28 | |
If you look at food and farming alone, | 0:50:28 | 0:50:31 | |
we are getting £11 billion worth of | 0:50:31 | 0:50:33 | |
business from being part of those rules. | 0:50:33 | 0:50:37 | |
If you don't follow those rules, you can't trade. | 0:50:37 | 0:50:39 | |
The man in the white T-shirt, there. | 0:50:39 | 0:50:41 | |
While I think it is important that we have an open discussion | 0:50:41 | 0:50:44 | |
concerning Britain's membership of the EU, | 0:50:44 | 0:50:46 | |
I think it is equally important | 0:50:46 | 0:50:48 | |
that the Government should focus on issues | 0:50:48 | 0:50:50 | |
at hand in our own country, | 0:50:50 | 0:50:52 | |
and I'm concerned that, perhaps, the Government might be | 0:50:52 | 0:50:55 | |
-spending too much time and resources on this EU campaign. -Exactly. | 0:50:55 | 0:50:58 | |
Liz, can you reassure me | 0:50:58 | 0:50:59 | |
the Government will be focusing on issues over here? | 0:50:59 | 0:51:01 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:51:01 | 0:51:04 | |
-OK. You don't have to. -I am focused on issues, | 0:51:04 | 0:51:07 | |
but I am concerned about the national energy and effort | 0:51:07 | 0:51:11 | |
that we will take five years or more | 0:51:11 | 0:51:12 | |
disentangling ourselves from the European Union. | 0:51:12 | 0:51:15 | |
-I think... -Five? | 0:51:15 | 0:51:17 | |
It was only two at the start of the programme! | 0:51:17 | 0:51:19 | |
LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE | 0:51:19 | 0:51:21 | |
-All right. -Julian, it was at least two. | 0:51:21 | 0:51:24 | |
If we're any longer, it will go to ten! | 0:51:24 | 0:51:26 | |
At least two, that's my latest estimate. | 0:51:26 | 0:51:28 | |
We have got only five or six minutes left. | 0:51:28 | 0:51:30 | |
I want to take one other question. | 0:51:30 | 0:51:32 | |
-We had the news... -I wanted to talk about Boris. | 0:51:32 | 0:51:35 | |
You want to say something about Boris? | 0:51:35 | 0:51:37 | |
-Could I answer about Boris? -OK, very quickly. | 0:51:37 | 0:51:40 | |
I just think that Boris is supposed | 0:51:40 | 0:51:42 | |
to give a boost to the Leave campaign, | 0:51:42 | 0:51:43 | |
but I think, mostly, he is giving a boost to the Boris campaign, | 0:51:43 | 0:51:47 | |
because I think most things that Boris does | 0:51:47 | 0:51:49 | |
are about Boris more than anything else! | 0:51:49 | 0:51:50 | |
The junior doctors announced | 0:51:50 | 0:51:52 | |
they are going to have three 48-hour strikes in March and April. | 0:51:52 | 0:51:56 | |
And the question comes from Jim Green, please. | 0:51:56 | 0:51:59 | |
The BMA has always enjoyed widespread public support. | 0:51:59 | 0:52:04 | |
Will this continue if the doctors carry out further strikes? | 0:52:04 | 0:52:08 | |
OK, we have talked about the issues often, | 0:52:08 | 0:52:10 | |
but the strike action is the thing that is at issue here. | 0:52:10 | 0:52:14 | |
Julian Fellowes? | 0:52:14 | 0:52:16 | |
Well, the thing I don't really understand about | 0:52:16 | 0:52:20 | |
these strikes is, obviously, when it was | 0:52:20 | 0:52:23 | |
discovered that you had a far greater chance of | 0:52:23 | 0:52:27 | |
dying if you went into hospital over the weekend... | 0:52:27 | 0:52:29 | |
DISSENTING SHOUTS | 0:52:29 | 0:52:31 | |
..clearly, someone had to do something about it. | 0:52:31 | 0:52:34 | |
I don't understand, if the junior doctors | 0:52:34 | 0:52:36 | |
actually thought the Secretary of State should not address it. | 0:52:36 | 0:52:40 | |
It's now gone from 6,000 extra deaths, we were told yesterday, | 0:52:40 | 0:52:43 | |
to 11,000 extra deaths. | 0:52:43 | 0:52:44 | |
That is not true! | 0:52:44 | 0:52:47 | |
So, that is what I don't understand. | 0:52:47 | 0:52:50 | |
But the thing I mostly don't understand, | 0:52:50 | 0:52:53 | |
is that 99% of people in this country want exactly | 0:52:53 | 0:52:58 | |
the same thing, a good, happy, clean, modern | 0:52:58 | 0:53:01 | |
Health Service which looks after the people | 0:53:01 | 0:53:04 | |
who work there and looks after the patients. | 0:53:04 | 0:53:06 | |
That is free at the point of use. | 0:53:06 | 0:53:08 | |
We all want it. Why is it not possible for all parties to | 0:53:08 | 0:53:13 | |
co-operate in solving the difficulties of the NHS, | 0:53:13 | 0:53:16 | |
and just for once, couldn't we be grown-up enough | 0:53:16 | 0:53:19 | |
to be able to collaborate instead of | 0:53:19 | 0:53:22 | |
turning everything into a political football? | 0:53:22 | 0:53:24 | |
All right. Giles Fraser, do you agree with that? | 0:53:24 | 0:53:27 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:53:27 | 0:53:29 | |
-Do you agree with him? -I don't agree with him. | 0:53:29 | 0:53:33 | |
I wouldn't want my mum | 0:53:33 | 0:53:36 | |
to go into hospital when there was a strike on, | 0:53:36 | 0:53:38 | |
and I would be worried about it, and I don't think | 0:53:38 | 0:53:41 | |
that... I don't think that junior doctors want to strike, | 0:53:41 | 0:53:44 | |
I really don't think they want to strike. But... | 0:53:44 | 0:53:46 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:53:46 | 0:53:49 | |
But, listen, but, listen, here's the thing. | 0:53:49 | 0:53:52 | |
What happens if you are in a situation | 0:53:52 | 0:53:54 | |
where you, as a junior doctor, sincerely believe - | 0:53:54 | 0:53:57 | |
and a great many of them do - | 0:53:57 | 0:53:59 | |
that this new contract, | 0:53:59 | 0:54:00 | |
this new situation being imposed upon them, | 0:54:00 | 0:54:03 | |
will actually put people's lives at risk? | 0:54:03 | 0:54:06 | |
-What happens if you think that? -APPLAUSE | 0:54:06 | 0:54:08 | |
What do you do if you think this is what... | 0:54:08 | 0:54:10 | |
And this is what they are saying, if you are so exhausted | 0:54:10 | 0:54:13 | |
that you actually can't deal with the patients properly, | 0:54:13 | 0:54:18 | |
they are right to say something, and if all they can do is strike, | 0:54:18 | 0:54:21 | |
I don't like it, but I understand it. | 0:54:21 | 0:54:24 | |
All right. | 0:54:24 | 0:54:25 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:54:25 | 0:54:29 | |
I expect you are a doctor. I am going to have to be brutal, | 0:54:29 | 0:54:31 | |
we've only three minutes of this programme left | 0:54:31 | 0:54:33 | |
because we talked a lot about Europe. Julia. | 0:54:33 | 0:54:35 | |
Look, it's very simple. | 0:54:35 | 0:54:37 | |
11,000 more people do die over the weekends in hospitals. | 0:54:37 | 0:54:40 | |
SHOUTING | 0:54:40 | 0:54:41 | |
The reason... Let me finish! | 0:54:41 | 0:54:44 | |
The reason they do die is because they arrive at | 0:54:44 | 0:54:46 | |
hospital sicker than the people who arrive Monday to Friday. | 0:54:46 | 0:54:49 | |
They are almost all emergency cases. | 0:54:49 | 0:54:52 | |
It is absolutely clear, the editor of the BMJ has said Jeremy Hunt | 0:54:52 | 0:54:56 | |
is publicly misrepresenting the study that he keeps quoting | 0:54:56 | 0:54:59 | |
about 11,000, and he is misusing the data to | 0:54:59 | 0:55:02 | |
mislead the public. The reality is, we are talking basic maths here. | 0:55:02 | 0:55:05 | |
It is not brain surgery or rocket science, it is basic maths. | 0:55:05 | 0:55:08 | |
Jeremy Hunt says the new deal for junior doctors... | 0:55:08 | 0:55:10 | |
It IS brain surgery! | 0:55:10 | 0:55:11 | |
..more pay for fewer hours for the same number of doctors | 0:55:11 | 0:55:16 | |
to cover more shifts. That is simply not mathematically possible. | 0:55:16 | 0:55:20 | |
Someone is lying. | 0:55:20 | 0:55:21 | |
You, sir? | 0:55:21 | 0:55:23 | |
The stats are wrong, and I agree with your point, | 0:55:23 | 0:55:25 | |
11,000 people more do not die at the weekend. | 0:55:25 | 0:55:27 | |
The stats cover Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday. | 0:55:27 | 0:55:30 | |
They do not die at the weekend. | 0:55:30 | 0:55:31 | |
If junior doctors' staffing at the weekend was the problem, | 0:55:31 | 0:55:34 | |
they would be dying at the weekend. They do not. | 0:55:34 | 0:55:36 | |
The highest death rate in hospitals is on a Wednesday. | 0:55:36 | 0:55:38 | |
-You have more doctors on a Wednesday than a Saturday and Sunday. -Yep. | 0:55:38 | 0:55:41 | |
It is not a weekend effect. | 0:55:41 | 0:55:43 | |
It is misrepresented by Mr Hunt, | 0:55:43 | 0:55:44 | |
who is misrepresenting and lying, frankly, | 0:55:44 | 0:55:46 | |
because when you are told something is wrong and continually repeat it, | 0:55:46 | 0:55:49 | |
it becomes a lie. He is lying about what is happening in hospital. | 0:55:49 | 0:55:53 | |
-Liz Truss... -We as doctors... | 0:55:53 | 0:55:54 | |
I'm the doctor on call for the next two strikes. | 0:55:54 | 0:55:58 | |
I'm the surgical registrar, the junior doctor who will be | 0:55:58 | 0:56:01 | |
looking after each and every one of you when you come in. | 0:56:01 | 0:56:03 | |
I will be making sure you are safe. I am the man below the consultant | 0:56:03 | 0:56:06 | |
who will operate on you if you are sick. | 0:56:06 | 0:56:07 | |
I will be there. No-one will be put at risk. I will make sure of it. | 0:56:07 | 0:56:11 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:56:11 | 0:56:13 | |
We will have to be very brief. | 0:56:13 | 0:56:15 | |
Junior doctors do an incredible job. | 0:56:18 | 0:56:21 | |
They are the backbone of our Health Service, | 0:56:21 | 0:56:23 | |
but in response to what Giles has said, | 0:56:23 | 0:56:26 | |
we are reducing the maximum number of hours doctors can work. | 0:56:26 | 0:56:30 | |
-In the current contract... -SHOUTING | 0:56:30 | 0:56:32 | |
-Let me finish... -..reducing the maximum long shift, you're not reducing the number of hours! | 0:56:32 | 0:56:36 | |
In the current contract, the maximum number of hours is 91 hours a week. | 0:56:36 | 0:56:39 | |
-Sorry, the question... -We think that is unsafe... -Liz. | 0:56:39 | 0:56:41 | |
-It's the same number of hours! -..and it needs to be reduced. | 0:56:41 | 0:56:44 | |
-You have made your point, sir. -I am so sorry. -Thank you very much. | 0:56:44 | 0:56:48 | |
Wait a moment, Jim Green's point, and we have 60 seconds or so left, | 0:56:48 | 0:56:52 | |
was will further strikes alienate public support? | 0:56:52 | 0:56:55 | |
In your view? | 0:56:55 | 0:56:56 | |
I think the contract is now fair. And I think... | 0:56:56 | 0:56:58 | |
You are not answering the question. | 0:56:58 | 0:57:00 | |
..it would be wrong if doctors did go on strike. | 0:57:00 | 0:57:02 | |
-Diane Abbott? -I believe, | 0:57:02 | 0:57:05 | |
despite the possible strike action, | 0:57:05 | 0:57:08 | |
that doctors will continue to have the support of the public | 0:57:08 | 0:57:12 | |
because people know junior doctors do not want to strike. | 0:57:12 | 0:57:16 | |
They also know... | 0:57:16 | 0:57:17 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:57:17 | 0:57:19 | |
There's been this quite dishonest misuse of | 0:57:19 | 0:57:25 | |
figures to suggest that doctors aren't already | 0:57:25 | 0:57:28 | |
working a seven-day week, and people are dying | 0:57:28 | 0:57:30 | |
because they won't. | 0:57:30 | 0:57:32 | |
Doctors will continue... | 0:57:32 | 0:57:33 | |
The public will have faith in its doctors | 0:57:33 | 0:57:36 | |
long after it's lost faith in this Tory Government. | 0:57:36 | 0:57:38 | |
-APPLAUSE -Hear, hear. | 0:57:38 | 0:57:42 | |
You can - the woman in white there, smiling, smiling so winningly, | 0:57:43 | 0:57:47 | |
you can have ten seconds. | 0:57:47 | 0:57:49 | |
-Me? -You, yes, but be very quick. | 0:57:49 | 0:57:50 | |
I just want to pop something into the general conversation, | 0:57:50 | 0:57:53 | |
because I'm a probate lawyer, | 0:57:53 | 0:57:55 | |
and I can tell you that the vast majority | 0:57:55 | 0:57:57 | |
of new probate cases come in on a Monday. | 0:57:57 | 0:58:00 | |
-This is for those who have died, sadly. -Deaths at the weekend. | 0:58:02 | 0:58:05 | |
All right. I don't know whether that adds anything at all. | 0:58:05 | 0:58:07 | |
LAUGHTER | 0:58:07 | 0:58:09 | |
You got away with it. Our time's up. | 0:58:09 | 0:58:11 | |
We are going to be in Liverpool next week, and we have | 0:58:11 | 0:58:14 | |
John McDonnell, Labour Shadow Chancellor, | 0:58:14 | 0:58:16 | |
among those on the panel in Liverpool. | 0:58:16 | 0:58:18 | |
The week after that we will be in Dundee, so if you want to come to | 0:58:18 | 0:58:21 | |
Liverpool or Dundee, you will be extremely welcome | 0:58:21 | 0:58:23 | |
to come and take part in these lively discussions, | 0:58:23 | 0:58:25 | |
Go to our website and apply there, | 0:58:25 | 0:58:28 | |
or the telephone number, which is on the screen. | 0:58:28 | 0:58:30 | |
If you are listening on Five Live, Radio Five Live, as I know | 0:58:33 | 0:58:36 | |
many people do now, you can continue the debate | 0:58:36 | 0:58:39 | |
on Question Time Extra Time, | 0:58:39 | 0:58:41 | |
but here, my thanks to our very first-rate panel... | 0:58:41 | 0:58:44 | |
LAUGHTER ..and our very first-rate audience. | 0:58:44 | 0:58:48 | |
From Poole, until next Thursday, goodnight. | 0:58:48 | 0:58:51 | |
APPLAUSE | 0:58:51 | 0:58:55 |