Browse content similar to 21/09/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Good morning from Manchester, where the Labour Party are gathering | :00:09. | :00:12. | |
for their annual conference as British politics adjusts to what | :00:13. | :00:15. | |
the rest of the UK. in Scotland might mean for | :00:16. | :00:53. | |
Scotland's decision to vote 'no means more powers heading north | :00:54. | :00:59. | |
But what about Home Rule for England? | :01:00. | :01:06. | |
Independence for Scotland has been his life's work. Alex Salmond tells | :01:07. | :01:11. | |
us why he is stepping down after losing Thursday's vote. And we've | :01:12. | :01:16. | |
In the North East and Cumbrha: people who want to be | :01:17. | :01:23. | |
Demands for power and money ` but will the region get either | :01:24. | :01:26. | |
And the pollution hotspots where air quality fails European standards. | :01:27. | :01:32. | |
powers and more freedom to spend. But what is the next devolution step | :01:33. | :01:46. | |
for the capital? With me, the best and brightest political panel in the | :01:47. | :01:49. | |
business, at least that is what they pay me to say every week. Nick Watt, | :01:50. | :01:53. | |
Helen Lewis and, this week, we have done some devolution ourselves to | :01:54. | :01:59. | |
other areas, and we have Sam Coates from the times. The union survived, | :02:00. | :02:04. | |
but only at the cost of more powers for the Scottish parliament and | :02:05. | :02:07. | |
enshrining the formula that gives Scotland a privileged position when | :02:08. | :02:11. | |
it comes to public spending, which has MPs on both sides of the Commons | :02:12. | :02:17. | |
of in arms. The Scottish question has been answered for now. Suddenly, | :02:18. | :02:21. | |
the English question takes centre stage, doesn't it? Absolutely. It | :02:22. | :02:32. | |
has a grubby feel, when that vow was put to the Scottish people, that | :02:33. | :02:35. | |
they hoped would swing the vote there was nothing about English only | :02:36. | :02:41. | |
votes. It was unconditional? The Tory proposal did talk very core | :02:42. | :02:45. | |
justly about looking at the proposals by a former clerk of the | :02:46. | :02:48. | |
House of Commons that looked at this issue. That was very cautious. - | :02:49. | :02:57. | |
cautiously. These proposals will not get through Westminster unless David | :02:58. | :03:00. | |
Cameron addresses the English-only issue. You look at people like Chris | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
Grayling in the Sunday Telegraph. Alistair Darling on the Andrew Marr | :03:05. | :03:07. | |
Show said you could not have a link between what you are giving Holyrood | :03:08. | :03:11. | |
and English-only MPs. Back on says, is welshing on the deal. -- comic he | :03:12. | :03:21. | |
They were furious that he gave away these tax powers and inscribed the | :03:22. | :03:28. | |
Barnett formula. They said they weren't going to vote for it. It is | :03:29. | :03:37. | |
a shameless piece of opportunism. Now they can say that Labour are the | :03:38. | :03:40. | |
ones that don't trust you and don't want to give you more powers. He | :03:41. | :03:44. | |
knows it is going to be a tight timetable. The idea of getting a | :03:45. | :03:48. | |
draft of this out by Burns Night, most people would say, given they | :03:49. | :03:52. | |
had six years to set up Scottish parliament, the idea we will solve | :03:53. | :03:55. | |
these huge constitutional questions in four months is absurd. But they | :03:56. | :04:03. | |
don't care about the constitutional questions, the one they care about | :04:04. | :04:09. | |
is English votes? There is a simple reason they won that. If you look at | :04:10. | :04:13. | |
the MPs in England alone, the Tories have a majority of 59, an | :04:14. | :04:18. | |
overwhelming bias, and if you strip out Wales Scotland and Northern | :04:19. | :04:21. | |
Ireland, so this has become a partisan issue. The question is | :04:22. | :04:24. | |
whether David Cameron can follow through on the promise. He said he | :04:25. | :04:30. | |
would link the two Scottish powers, but it's not clear you will get | :04:31. | :04:35. | |
either before the general election. It's not but the purpose is to cause | :04:36. | :04:39. | |
Labour Party discomfort, and it is. You can see with date -- Ed Miliband | :04:40. | :04:45. | |
this morning, they find it very hard to answer the question, why | :04:46. | :04:48. | |
shouldn't there be English votes for English laws? Ed Miliband this | :04:49. | :04:54. | |
morning was saying how London MPs get to vote on London transport and | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
English MPs don't outside of London and it is confusing, but Labour is | :05:00. | :05:03. | |
in a difficult position. They were before the Prime Minister made his | :05:04. | :05:07. | |
announcement. The yes side triumphed in Glasgow, the largest city in | :05:08. | :05:11. | |
Scotland, a Labour heartland, and the Prime Minister is saying that if | :05:12. | :05:13. | |
Labour don't agree to this the Prime Minister is saying that if | :05:14. | :05:17. | |
handing a gift to the SNP, the Prime Minister is saying that if | :05:18. | :05:22. | |
Labour voters would vote for to see the Prime Minister is saying that if | :05:23. | :05:38. | |
unarguable. If you say her chewing a partisan way, you can't sell it to | :05:39. | :05:42. | |
the country. Ed Miliband is on course to have a majority of about | :05:43. | :05:46. | |
20, and you take the 40 English MPs, and he hasn't got it. This is a | :05:47. | :05:51. | |
coalition government where the Conservatives haven't got really to | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
be in charge, they have put in sweeping laws. Labour should | :05:57. | :05:59. | |
probably take the bullet on this one. | :06:00. | :07:22. | |
probably take the bullet on this spent on social housing in Scotland | :07:23. | :07:26. | |
than in Yorkshire and the North West and the Midlands. The Welsh do very | :07:27. | :07:29. | |
poorly on social services for the elderly. What are we saying? That | :07:30. | :07:34. | |
they need our children, patients and the elderly are worth less than the | :07:35. | :07:39. | |
Scots? That's not the way to have a sustainable solution. I understand | :07:40. | :07:44. | |
the distribution impact of the Barnett Formula, but Westminster | :07:45. | :07:47. | |
politicians are already held in contempt by a lot of people and to | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
rat on such a public pledge would confirm their worst fears. Your | :07:53. | :07:58. | |
leader would have secured the union on a false prospectus. First of | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
all, it's clear from the Ashcroft poll that the offer made in the | :08:03. | :08:08. | |
Scottish newspaper had zero effect and if anything was | :08:09. | :08:10. | |
counter-productive to the overall result because two thirds of swing | :08:11. | :08:13. | |
voters in the last few days voted for independence. But we can't keep | :08:14. | :08:18. | |
proceeding without looking at the promises made to the English. We | :08:19. | :08:23. | |
said in the referendum that we would have English laws -- English votes | :08:24. | :08:27. | |
on English issues. The Liberal Democrats, in their manifesto, | :08:28. | :08:30. | |
pledged to scrap the Barnett Formula. We have to reconcile all of | :08:31. | :08:34. | |
the promises to all parts of the UK, and Alex Salmond talks about a | :08:35. | :08:38. | |
Westminster stitch up, but what he's trying to do is, with gross double | :08:39. | :08:44. | |
standards, is in French stitch up in rapid time, which would be grossly | :08:45. | :08:49. | |
unfair to the rest of the rest of UK -- is contrive stitch up. What is | :08:50. | :08:55. | |
unfair about the current spending formula? The extra money Scotland | :08:56. | :09:01. | |
gets from Barnet, is covered by the oil revenues it sends to London | :09:02. | :09:06. | |
Scotland is only getting back on spending what it pays in tax. There | :09:07. | :09:09. | |
is no analysis out there that suggests it is the same amount. | :09:10. | :09:16. | |
Having voted to stay in the UK. Let me give you the figures. Last year | :09:17. | :09:21. | |
revenues were 4.5 billion, and the Barnett Formula was worth 4.5 | :09:22. | :09:29. | |
billion to Scotland. It is awash. A huge amount of British taxpayer | :09:30. | :09:32. | |
investment has gone into extracting North Sea oil, and if we move to a | :09:33. | :09:36. | |
more federal system, we would need to look at things like the | :09:37. | :09:40. | |
allocation of resources, but the Barnett Formula has been lambasted | :09:41. | :09:44. | |
as a national embarrassment and grossly unfair by its Labour Party | :09:45. | :09:48. | |
architect, Lord Barnett. So what we need is to change this mechanism so | :09:49. | :09:53. | |
it is based on need. The irony is, when the Scots allocate Avenue to | :09:54. | :09:57. | |
the -- revenue to their local authorities, it's done on a needs | :09:58. | :10:01. | |
basis, and what is good for Scotland must be good for the rest of | :10:02. | :10:06. | |
Britain. One final question. The Prime Minister is now making his | :10:07. | :10:10. | |
promise of more home rule for Scotland conditional on English | :10:11. | :10:13. | |
votes for English laws. Why didn't he spell out the condition when he | :10:14. | :10:17. | |
made his bow to the Scottish people? Why has this condition been tacked | :10:18. | :10:21. | |
on by the Prime Minister? In the heat of the referendum debate lots | :10:22. | :10:27. | |
of things were said, but the truth is that Parliament must also look at | :10:28. | :10:32. | |
this and make its views known, and English MPs as well. You will find | :10:33. | :10:36. | |
that conservative as well as a lot of Labour MPs would say, we cannot | :10:37. | :10:39. | |
just rush through a deal that is unsustainable. It has to be good for | :10:40. | :10:45. | |
all parts of Britain. Yes, we should deliver on our promises for more | :10:46. | :10:48. | |
devolution to Scotland, but let s deliver on promises to be English, | :10:49. | :10:51. | |
and Northern Irish. Why are they locked out of the debate? Let's | :10:52. | :10:56. | |
leave it there. Thank you for joining us. | :10:57. | :10:58. | |
The man responsible for taking Scottish nationalism from | :10:59. | :11:00. | |
the political fringes to within touching distance of victory, Alex | :11:01. | :11:02. | |
Salmond, has a flair for dramatic announcements, and he gave us | :11:03. | :11:05. | |
another on Friday when he revealed he's to stand | :11:06. | :11:07. | |
Friends and foes have paid tribute to his extraordinary career. | :11:08. | :11:12. | |
In a moment I'll be speaking to Alex Salmond, | :11:13. | :11:14. | |
but first here's Adam Fleming with the story of the vote that broke | :11:15. | :11:17. | |
The BBC's HQ on the Clyde, the whole place converted into a studio for | :11:18. | :11:39. | |
Scotland's big night. You know what you need for big events, big | :11:40. | :11:42. | |
screens, and there are loads of them here. That one is three stories | :11:43. | :11:46. | |
high, and this is the one Jeremy Vine uses for his graphics. The | :11:47. | :11:50. | |
other thing that is massive is the turnout in the referendum, it is | :11:51. | :11:55. | |
enormous. It was around 85% of the electorate, that is 4 million ballot | :11:56. | :12:00. | |
papers. First to declare Clackmannanshire. No, 19,000. 1 ,000 | :12:01. | :12:13. | |
and 36. The first Noel of the night, and there were plenty more. -- the | :12:14. | :12:18. | |
first no vote. The better together campaigners were over the moon, like | :12:19. | :12:22. | |
Jim Murphy, who had campaigned in 100 different towns. I don't want to | :12:23. | :12:27. | |
sound schmaltzy, but it makes you think more of Scotland. It makes you | :12:28. | :12:37. | |
small tree. Yes, 194,779. Around five a.m., the Yes campaign | :12:38. | :12:40. | |
applauded as they won Scotland's biggest city, Glasgow. Dundee went | :12:41. | :12:46. | |
their way as well, but just for areas out of 32 opted for | :12:47. | :12:49. | |
independence. How many copies have you had? This is my second cup of | :12:50. | :12:54. | |
tea on the morning -- how many copies. He was enjoying the | :12:55. | :12:59. | |
refreshments on offer, but the yes campaigners were not in a happy | :13:00. | :13:04. | |
place. We are in the bowels of one of the parts of the British | :13:05. | :13:08. | |
establishment that, I've got to say, has probably done its job in this | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
referendum, because I think the BBC has been critical in shoring up the | :13:14. | :13:18. | |
establishment and have supported the no campaign as best as they could. | :13:19. | :13:23. | |
But there was no arguing with the numbers, and by sunrise, the BBC | :13:24. | :13:28. | |
called it. Scotland has voted no in this referendum on independence The | :13:29. | :13:34. | |
result, in Fife, has taken the no campaign over the line and the | :13:35. | :13:37. | |
official result of this referendum is a no. There we go, on a screen | :13:38. | :13:44. | |
three stories high, Scotland has said no to independence. As soon as | :13:45. | :13:48. | |
the newsprint was driving north of the border, the focus shifted south | :13:49. | :13:53. | |
as the Prime Minister pledged more devolution for Scotland but only if | :13:54. | :13:57. | |
it happened everywhere else as well. Just as Scotland will vote | :13:58. | :13:59. | |
separately in the Scottish Parliament on their issues of tax, | :14:00. | :14:04. | |
spending on welfare, so to England, as well as Wales and Northern | :14:05. | :14:08. | |
Ireland, should be able to vote on these issues, and all this must take | :14:09. | :14:13. | |
place in tandem with and at the same pace as the settlement for Scotland. | :14:14. | :14:18. | |
It began to dawn on us all that we might end up doing this again. See | :14:19. | :14:27. | |
you for an English referendum soon? Northern Ireland. There could be | :14:28. | :14:30. | |
another one in Scotland. But not next weekend? Give me a break. There | :14:31. | :14:38. | |
was no break for Nick, because Alex Salmond came up with one last twist, | :14:39. | :14:42. | |
his resignation was as leader, my time is nearly over. But the | :14:43. | :14:48. | |
Scotland, the campaign continues, and the dream shall never die. So, | :14:49. | :14:55. | |
the referendum settled, the Constitution in flux, and a leader | :14:56. | :14:57. | |
gone. All in a night work. Alex Salmond is to stand down as | :14:58. | :15:07. | |
First Minister of Scotland. He shows no signs of going quietly. Last | :15:08. | :15:11. | |
night, I spoke to the SNP leader in Aberdeen and began by asking him if | :15:12. | :15:15. | |
it was always his intention to resign if he lost the referendum. I | :15:16. | :15:20. | |
certainly have thought about it Andrew. But for most of the | :15:21. | :15:23. | |
referendum campaign I thought we were going to win. So, I was... | :15:24. | :15:29. | |
Yeah, maybe a few months back I considered it. But I only finally | :15:30. | :15:33. | |
made up my mind on Friday lunch time. Did you agonise over the | :15:34. | :15:41. | |
decision to stand down? I'm not really an agonising person. When you | :15:42. | :15:51. | |
get beaten in a referendum, you have to consider standing down as a real | :15:52. | :15:57. | |
possibility. Taking responsibility and politics has gone out of fashion | :15:58. | :16:01. | |
but there is an aspect, if you need a campaign, and I was the leader of | :16:02. | :16:05. | |
the Yes Campaign, and you don't win, you have to contemplate if you are | :16:06. | :16:09. | |
the best person to lead future political campaigns. In my | :16:10. | :16:12. | |
judgement, it was time for the SNP and the broader yes movement, the | :16:13. | :16:17. | |
National movement of Scotland, they would benefit from new leadership. | :16:18. | :16:22. | |
In your heart of hearts, through the campaign, as referendum on day | :16:23. | :16:25. | |
approached, you did think you were going to win? Yes, I did. I thought | :16:26. | :16:31. | |
for most of the last month of the campaign, we were in with a real | :16:32. | :16:39. | |
chance. In the last week I thought we had pulled ahead. I thought the | :16:40. | :16:42. | |
decisive aspect wasn't so much the fear mongering, the scaremongering, | :16:43. | :16:49. | |
the kitchen sink being thrown at Scotland by orchestration from | :16:50. | :16:51. | |
Downing Street, I thought the real thing was the pledge, the vow, the | :16:52. | :16:55. | |
offer of something else. A lot of people that had been moving across | :16:56. | :17:00. | |
to independence saw within that a reason to say, well, we can get | :17:01. | :17:04. | |
something anyway without the perceived risks that were being | :17:05. | :17:11. | |
festooned upon them. You were only five points away from your dream. | :17:12. | :17:18. | |
You won Scotland's largest city There is now the prospect of more | :17:19. | :17:23. | |
power. Why not stay and be an enhanced First Minister? Well, it is | :17:24. | :17:29. | |
a good phrase. I'm not going away, though. I'm still going to be part | :17:30. | :17:34. | |
of the political process. In Scotland, if people in Aberdeenshire | :17:35. | :17:37. | |
wish to keep electing me, that is what I will do. But I don't have to | :17:38. | :17:43. | |
be First Minister of Scotland, leader of the Yes Campaign, to see | :17:44. | :17:47. | |
that achieved. The SNP is a strong and powerful leadership team. There | :17:48. | :17:52. | |
are a number of people that would do a fantastic job as leader of the | :17:53. | :17:56. | |
party and First Minister. I've been leader of the party for the last 24 | :17:57. | :18:02. | |
years, I think it is time to give somebody else a shot. There are many | :18:03. | :18:06. | |
able-bodied people that will do that well. -- many able people that will | :18:07. | :18:10. | |
do that well. I'm still part of the national movement, arguing to take | :18:11. | :18:17. | |
this forward. I think you are right, the question, one of the irony is | :18:18. | :18:21. | |
developing so quickly after the referendum, it might be those that | :18:22. | :18:24. | |
lost on Thursday end up as the political winners and those that won | :18:25. | :18:30. | |
end up as the losers. When we met just for the vote, a couple of days | :18:31. | :18:35. | |
before the vote, you said to me that there was very little you would | :18:36. | :18:38. | |
change about the campaign strategy. Is that still your view? Yes. There | :18:39. | :18:45. | |
are one or two things, like any campaign, there is no such thing as | :18:46. | :18:51. | |
a pitcher campaign. I would refer not to dwell on such things. I will | :18:52. | :18:56. | |
leave of my book, which will be called 100 Days, coming out before | :18:57. | :19:00. | |
Christmas. Once you read that, I will probably reveal the things I | :19:01. | :19:04. | |
would have changed. Basically, broadly, this was an extraordinary | :19:05. | :19:08. | |
campaign. Not just a political campaign, but a campaign involving | :19:09. | :19:12. | |
the grassroots of Scotland in an energising, empowering way, the like | :19:13. | :19:17. | |
of which in on of us have witnessed. It was an extraordinary phenomenon | :19:18. | :19:20. | |
of grassroots campaigning, which carried the Yes Campaign so far | :19:21. | :19:26. | |
almost to victory. If Rupert Murdoch put his Scottish Sun behind you | :19:27. | :19:37. | |
would have that made the difference? If ifs and ands were pots and | :19:38. | :19:45. | |
pans... Why did he not? I would not say that, you have form with him | :19:46. | :19:49. | |
that I do not have. I'm not sure about that. I was very encouraged. | :19:50. | :19:56. | |
The coverage, not in the other papers, The Times, which was | :19:57. | :20:00. | |
extremely hostile to Scottish independence, but the coverage in | :20:01. | :20:04. | |
the Scottish Sun was fair, balanced and we certainly got a very fair | :20:05. | :20:13. | |
kick of the ball. In newspapers I would settle for no editorial line | :20:14. | :20:17. | |
and just balanced coverage. We certainly got that from the Scottish | :20:18. | :20:20. | |
Sun and that was an encouragement. I think you saw from his tweets, | :20:21. | :20:27. | |
certainly in his heart he would have liked to have seen a move forward in | :20:28. | :20:36. | |
Scotland and I like that. He said if you lost, that was it, referendum | :20:37. | :20:41. | |
wise, for a generation, which he defined as about 20 years. Is that | :20:42. | :20:47. | |
still your view? Yes, it is. It has always been my view. It's a personal | :20:48. | :20:51. | |
view. There are always things that can change in politics. If the UK | :20:52. | :20:56. | |
moved out of the European Union for example, that would be the sort of | :20:57. | :20:59. | |
circumstance. Some people would argue with Westminster parties, and | :21:00. | :21:03. | |
I'm actually not surprised that they are reneging on commitments, I am | :21:04. | :21:09. | |
just surprised by the speed they are doing it. They seem to be totally | :21:10. | :21:12. | |
shameless in these matters. You don't think they will meet the vow? | :21:13. | :21:18. | |
You don't think there will keep to their vow? They are not, for that | :21:19. | :21:22. | |
essential reason you saw developing on Friday. The Prime Minister wants | :21:23. | :21:27. | |
to link change in Scotland to change in England. He wants to do that | :21:28. | :21:30. | |
because he has difficulty in carrying his backbenchers on this | :21:31. | :21:35. | |
and they are under pressure from UKIP. The Labour leadership are | :21:36. | :21:38. | |
frightened of any changes in England which leave them without a majority | :21:39. | :21:41. | |
in the House of Commons on English matters. I would not call it an | :21:42. | :21:47. | |
irresistible force and immovable object, one is resistible and one is | :21:48. | :21:53. | |
movable. They are at loggerheads. The vow, I think, was something | :21:54. | :21:56. | |
cooked up in desperation for the last few days of the campaign. I | :21:57. | :21:58. | |
think everybody in Scotland now engines that. -- recognises that. It | :21:59. | :22:05. | |
was the people that were persuaded to vote no that word tricked, | :22:06. | :22:10. | |
effectively. They are the ones that are really angry. Ed Miliband and | :22:11. | :22:15. | |
David Cameron, if they are watching this, I would be more worried about | :22:16. | :22:22. | |
the anger of the no voters than the opinion of the Yes Vote on that | :22:23. | :22:29. | |
matter. If independence is on the back burner for now, what would you | :22:30. | :22:35. | |
advise your successor's strategy for the SNP to be? I would advise him or | :22:36. | :22:41. | |
her not to listen to advice from their predecessor. A new leader | :22:42. | :22:48. | |
brings forward a new strategy. I think this is, for the SNP, a very | :22:49. | :22:53. | |
favourable political time. There have been 5000 new members joined | :22:54. | :22:59. | |
since Thursday. That is about a 25% increase in the party membership in | :23:00. | :23:02. | |
the space of a few days. More than that, I think this is an opportunity | :23:03. | :23:15. | |
for the SNP. But my goal is the opportunity for Scotland. I would | :23:16. | :23:18. | |
repeat I am not retiring from politics. I'm standing down as First | :23:19. | :23:25. | |
Minister of Scotland. On Friday coming back to the north-east of | :23:26. | :23:28. | |
Scotland, I passed through Dundee, which voted yes by a stud -- | :23:29. | :23:35. | |
substantial margin. There was a line of a song I couldn't get out of my | :23:36. | :23:39. | |
head, and old Jacobite song, rewritten by Robert Burns, the last | :23:40. | :23:47. | |
line is, so, tremble falls wakes, in the midst of your glee, you've not | :23:48. | :23:55. | |
seen the last of my bonnets and me. So you are staying a member of the | :23:56. | :23:58. | |
Scottish Parliament, shall we see you again in the House of Commons? | :23:59. | :24:03. | |
What does the future hold for you? Membership of Scottish Parliament is | :24:04. | :24:10. | |
dependent on the good folk of Aberdeenshire east. If they choose | :24:11. | :24:14. | |
to elect me, I will be delighted to serve. I've always loved being a | :24:15. | :24:19. | |
constituency member of Parliament, I have known some front line | :24:20. | :24:22. | |
politicians that regarded that as a chore. I'm not saying they didn t do | :24:23. | :24:26. | |
it properly, I am sure they did But I love it. You get distilled wisdom | :24:27. | :24:32. | |
from being a constituency member of Parliament that helps you keep your | :24:33. | :24:34. | |
feet on the ground and have a good Parliament that helps you keep your | :24:35. | :24:38. | |
people. I have no difficulty Parliament that helps you keep your | :24:39. | :26:29. | |
left-wing candidates? I don't think I accept the characterisation of | :26:30. | :26:32. | |
candidates being left wing. I don't think your viewers see politics in | :26:33. | :26:36. | |
terms of what is left and right I think they see it in terms of what | :26:37. | :26:39. | |
is right and wrong. Obviously, many of the things we have been talking | :26:40. | :26:44. | |
about, how we ensure that the next generation can do better than the | :26:45. | :26:47. | |
last, how we raise the wages of your viewers, who are currently working | :26:48. | :26:51. | |
very hard but not making a wage they can live off, that is what they are | :26:52. | :26:54. | |
talking about and that is what the public will judge them on. But they | :26:55. | :26:59. | |
want to raise taxes, they don't want to cut public spending, they want to | :27:00. | :27:02. | |
re-nationalise the railways, they don't think there is too much | :27:03. | :27:05. | |
immigration, they want to scrap Trident. These are all positions | :27:06. | :27:09. | |
clearly to the left of current party policy. But that is your | :27:10. | :27:13. | |
characterisation. If you look at our policy to increase the top rate of | :27:14. | :27:18. | |
tax to 50% for people earning over ?150,000, that is a central | :27:19. | :27:21. | |
position. It is something that enjoys the support of the majority | :27:22. | :27:28. | |
of the public. Trident? If you talk to the British public about | :27:29. | :27:32. | |
immigration, yes, there are concerns about the numbers coming in and out, | :27:33. | :27:36. | |
yes people want to see integration, yes, people want to see people | :27:37. | :27:40. | |
putting a contribution before they take out, the people recognise, if | :27:41. | :27:43. | |
you look at our multicultural nation, we have derived a lot of | :27:44. | :27:47. | |
benefits from immigration. I don't think your characterisation of those | :27:48. | :27:51. | |
positions, that is your view... It's not, it is their view. They are | :27:52. | :27:58. | |
saying... You describe it... You described those positions as left | :27:59. | :28:03. | |
wing positions. I am saying to you that I actually think a lot of those | :28:04. | :28:08. | |
positions are centrist positions that would enjoy the support of the | :28:09. | :28:11. | |
majority of your viewers. I don t think your viewers think the idea of | :28:12. | :28:16. | |
the broadest shoulders bearing the heaviest burden in forms of tax are | :28:17. | :28:19. | |
going to see it as a way out, radical principle. They want to | :28:20. | :28:25. | |
scrap Trident, not party policy It isn't. | :28:26. | :28:30. | |
I think that 73... Well, we will have 400 Parliamentary candidates at | :28:31. | :28:36. | |
the time of the next general election, not including current MPs. | :28:37. | :28:42. | |
This is 73 out of over 400 of them. I think we also need to treat the | :28:43. | :28:48. | |
survey with a bit of caution. They are not representative? You are | :28:49. | :28:52. | |
basically quoting the results of a small percentage of our | :28:53. | :28:55. | |
Parliamentary candidates. It's pretty safe to say when you look at | :28:56. | :28:59. | |
their views, they might be right or wrong, that's not my point, it's | :29:00. | :29:04. | |
fairly safe to say that new Labour is dead? Again, I don't think people | :29:05. | :29:12. | |
see things in terms of gold -- old or new Labour. We are standing at a | :29:13. | :29:15. | |
Labour Party. We are a great country, but we have big challenges. | :29:16. | :29:21. | |
We want to make sure that people can achieve their dreams and aspirations | :29:22. | :29:24. | |
in this country. Too many people are not in that position. Too many | :29:25. | :29:27. | |
people worry about the prospects of their children. Too many people do | :29:28. | :29:32. | |
not earn a wage they can live off. Too many people are worried about | :29:33. | :29:35. | |
the change. We have to make sure we are giving people a stake in the | :29:36. | :29:38. | |
future. That is a Labour thing, you want to call it old or new come I | :29:39. | :29:42. | |
don't care. It's a choice between Labour and the Conservatives in | :29:43. | :29:53. | |
terms of who runs the next government. That one of your | :29:54. | :29:55. | |
candidate we spoke to things that the party's relationship with the | :29:56. | :29:57. | |
unions is to close. 30% of them think it should be closer. You have | :29:58. | :30:02. | |
spoken to 73 out of 400 candidates. Why should the others be any | :30:03. | :30:07. | |
different? It's a fairly representative Sample. Many people | :30:08. | :30:11. | |
working on this set are the member of the union, the National union of | :30:12. | :30:14. | |
journalists. People that came here to this Conference would have been | :30:15. | :30:18. | |
brought here by trade union members. Do you think the relationship should | :30:19. | :30:23. | |
be closer? I think it is where it should be. It should not be closer? | :30:24. | :30:27. | |
I think that trade unions help create wealth in our country. If you | :30:28. | :30:30. | |
look at some other success stories we are in the north-west, GM | :30:31. | :30:36. | |
Vauxhall is there because you have trade unions working in partnership | :30:37. | :30:40. | |
with government and local employees to make sure we kept producing cars. | :30:41. | :30:45. | |
I'm not asking if unions are good or bad, I'm asking if Labour should be | :30:46. | :30:49. | |
closer. You are presupposing, by the tone of your question, that our | :30:50. | :30:57. | |
relationship is a problem. Let's turn to the English question. Why do | :30:58. | :31:01. | |
you need a constitutional conversation where you have to | :31:02. | :31:04. | |
discuss whether English people voting on English matters is | :31:05. | :31:07. | |
unfair? We want to give the regions and cities in England more voice, | :31:08. | :31:10. | |
but let's get it into perspective, we have had a situation where the | :31:11. | :31:18. | |
Scottish people, as desired buying rich people, have to remain part of | :31:19. | :31:24. | |
the UK -- by English people. What is the answer to the question? I don't | :31:25. | :31:28. | |
want to get to a situation where people have voted for solidarity | :31:29. | :31:31. | |
where you have a prime ministers talking about dividing up the UK | :31:32. | :31:36. | |
Parliament. Let me put this point you. Most Scottish voters think it | :31:37. | :31:40. | |
is unfair that Scottish MPs get to vote on English matters. That comes | :31:41. | :31:44. | |
out in Scottish polls. Why don't you see it as unfair? If the Scots see | :31:45. | :31:50. | |
it as unfair, why don't you? This is an age-old conundrum that has been | :31:51. | :31:54. | |
around for 100 years and it's not so simple. You're talking about making | :31:55. | :31:57. | |
a fundamental change to the British constitution on a whim. It's not | :31:58. | :32:02. | |
just an issue, in respect of Scottish MPs. As a London MP, I can | :32:03. | :32:09. | |
vote on matters relating to the transport of England and transport | :32:10. | :32:13. | |
is a devolved matter in London. In Wales, there are a number of | :32:14. | :32:16. | |
competencies that Welsh MPs can vote on and they've been devolved to | :32:17. | :32:20. | |
them. So with all of these different votes, you will exclude different | :32:21. | :32:24. | |
MPs? I think the solution is not necessarily to obsess about what is | :32:25. | :32:27. | |
happening between MPs in Westminster. That turns people | :32:28. | :32:31. | |
politics. We need to devolve more. I think we should be giving the cities | :32:32. | :32:35. | |
and regions of England more autonomy in the way that we are doing in | :32:36. | :32:40. | |
Scotland, but I've got to say, Andrew, it's dishonourable and in | :32:41. | :32:44. | |
bad faith for the Prime Minister to now seek to link what he agreed | :32:45. | :32:49. | |
before the referendum to this issue of English votes for English MPs. | :32:50. | :32:53. | |
That is totally dishonourable and in bad faith. You have promised to | :32:54. | :32:56. | |
devolve more tax powers to Scotland. What would they be? This is being | :32:57. | :33:00. | |
decided at the moment. I cannot give you the exact detail of what the tax | :33:01. | :33:05. | |
powers would be. Could you give us a rough idea? There is a White Paper | :33:06. | :33:09. | |
being produced before November and there will be draft legislation put | :33:10. | :33:15. | |
forward in January. Your leader has vowed that this will happen. And you | :33:16. | :33:18. | |
haven't got a policy? You can't tell us what the tax powers will be? I | :33:19. | :33:22. | |
can't tell you on this programme right now. But we have accepted the | :33:23. | :33:26. | |
principle on further devolution on tax, spending on welfare and we will | :33:27. | :33:31. | |
have further details in due course. Your leader promised to maintain the | :33:32. | :33:33. | |
Barnett Formula for the foreseeable future. Why is that fair when it | :33:34. | :33:39. | |
enshrines more per capita spending for Scotland than it does for Wales, | :33:40. | :33:43. | |
which is poorer, and more than many of the poorer regions in England | :33:44. | :33:47. | |
get? Why is that fair? We have said that in terms of looking at go - | :33:48. | :33:52. | |
local government spending playing out in this Parliament, we have | :33:53. | :33:54. | |
looked at what the government has done which is having already | :33:55. | :33:58. | |
deprived communities having money taken away from them and wealthier | :33:59. | :34:03. | |
communities are getting more. We accept that the Barnett Formula has | :34:04. | :34:09. | |
worked well. How has it works well? There is a cross parliamentary | :34:10. | :34:12. | |
consensus as they don't know what to do about it. Why has it works well, | :34:13. | :34:18. | |
when Wales, clearly loses out? I'm not sure by I accept that when you | :34:19. | :34:23. | |
look at overall underspend -- government spending. It is per | :34:24. | :34:27. | |
capita spending in Scotland, which is way ahead of per capita spending | :34:28. | :34:33. | |
in Wales, but per capita incomes in Scotland are way ahead of Wales Why | :34:34. | :34:39. | |
is that fair Labour politician? We have said we want to have more | :34:40. | :34:43. | |
equitable distribution. You haven't, you have said you will keep the | :34:44. | :34:47. | |
Barnett Formula. I'm not sure necessarily punishing Scotland is | :34:48. | :34:51. | |
the way to go. The way that this debate is going, what message does | :34:52. | :34:54. | |
it send to the Scottish people? I want to be clear, I am delighted | :34:55. | :35:00. | |
with the result we have got. The unity and solidarity where | :35:01. | :35:02. | |
maintaining across the nations of the United Kingdom. All of this | :35:03. | :35:06. | |
separatist talk, setting up different nations of the UK against | :35:07. | :35:09. | |
each other goes completely against what we've all been campaigning for | :35:10. | :35:13. | |
over the last two years, and we shouldn't have any truck with it. | :35:14. | :35:16. | |
Coming onto the announcement on the minimum wage, you would increase it | :35:17. | :35:22. | |
by ?1 50 to take it to ?8, which would be over five years. That is | :35:23. | :35:26. | |
all you are going to do over five years. Have you worked out how much | :35:27. | :35:31. | |
of this increase will be clawed back in taxation and fewer benefits? Work | :35:32. | :35:38. | |
has been done on it. How much? I can't give you an exact figure. The | :35:39. | :35:44. | |
policy pays for itself. The way we have looked at this, we looked at | :35:45. | :35:48. | |
the government figures, and if people are earning more, they would | :35:49. | :35:52. | |
therefore be paying more in income tax and they will be receiving less | :35:53. | :35:57. | |
in benefit and will pay out less in tax credits, so we are confident | :35:58. | :36:01. | |
that this will pay for itself. I'm not asking about the pavement, I'm | :36:02. | :36:04. | |
asking what it means for low paid workers will stop they will get an | :36:05. | :36:09. | |
extra 30p per hour -- about the payment. How much of the 30p to they | :36:10. | :36:15. | |
get to keep? In terms of what they get in the first instance, somebody | :36:16. | :36:19. | |
on the minimum wage now, with our proposal, would get in the region of | :36:20. | :36:23. | |
?3000 a year more than they are at the moment. That is before tax and | :36:24. | :36:28. | |
benefits. How much do they keep I cannot give you an exact figure Why | :36:29. | :36:35. | |
don't you give me an exact figure if you've done the modelling? We are | :36:36. | :36:39. | |
talking about some of the lowest paid people in the country, and I | :36:40. | :36:42. | |
would suggest to you that going down this route, they would face a | :36:43. | :36:48. | |
marginal rate of tax of 50 or 6 % and they will not keep most of this | :36:49. | :36:52. | |
increase you are talking about. I don't accept your figures. But you | :36:53. | :36:57. | |
haven't got any of your own. I just don't have any in my head I can give | :36:58. | :37:02. | |
you right now. Don't you think out policies before you announce them? | :37:03. | :37:05. | |
Of course we think our policies before we announce them but we are | :37:06. | :37:08. | |
confident people have more in their pocket and will be better off with | :37:09. | :37:12. | |
the changes proposed, and we are also seeking to incentivise | :37:13. | :37:15. | |
employers to pay a living wage as well. At the end of the day, as I | :37:16. | :37:19. | |
said, the economy is recovering great, but we know, at the moment, | :37:20. | :37:23. | |
it's still not delivering for a huge number of your viewers and we're | :37:24. | :37:26. | |
determined to do something about it. The status quo is not an option And | :37:27. | :37:29. | |
even joining me. Twice in three days. You can't have too much of a | :37:30. | :37:35. | |
good thing. I am mad. He said that, not me. | :37:36. | :37:38. | |
It's just gone 11.35, you're watching the Sunday Politics. We | :37:39. | :37:40. | |
say goodbye to viewers in Scotland who leave us now for | :37:41. | :37:43. | |
Coming up here in twenty minutes, we'll be joined by John Prescott to | :37:44. | :37:48. | |
talk about the challenge facing Labour as their conference starts | :37:49. | :37:50. | |
First though, the Sunday Politics where you are. | :37:51. | :38:00. | |
Hello, and welcome to your local part of the show: | :38:01. | :38:02. | |
We're live with all the weekend's political devdlopments | :38:03. | :38:04. | |
as the Prime Minister promises a new deal for regions | :38:05. | :38:07. | |
But can the parties agree on what devolved powers we should gdt ` | :38:08. | :38:14. | |
The Labour MP for Sunderland Central Julie Elliott | :38:15. | :38:18. | |
and North East Conservative Jeremy Middleton join me in the sttdio | :38:19. | :38:21. | |
I'll also be talking to the leader of Newcastle Council | :38:22. | :38:25. | |
We'll also be reporting on the 15 pollution hotspots, | :38:26. | :38:27. | |
from Carlisle to Durham, whdre air quality fails to meet EU st`ndards. | :38:28. | :38:35. | |
First, a promise of an ?8 an hour minimum wage if | :38:36. | :38:38. | |
Julie Elliott, there were concerns there about whether tax will swallow | :38:39. | :38:58. | |
up some of it, isn't it radhcal thing Conservatives are talking | :38:59. | :39:02. | |
about the minimum wage? We `re the people who introduced the mhnimum | :39:03. | :39:05. | |
wage, the Conservatives votdd against it. They said that ht would | :39:06. | :39:10. | |
lose jobs, but it's created jobs. If people have more money to spend in | :39:11. | :39:15. | |
the economy then that is a good thing, but ?8 an hour is a decent | :39:16. | :39:20. | |
amount of money to be the mhnimum amount anybody should learn for | :39:21. | :39:24. | |
work. The CBI has already r`ised concerns. This is going to push up | :39:25. | :39:31. | |
their costs. All of the polhtical parties talk about a higher minimum | :39:32. | :39:37. | |
wage, George Osborne was calling for one last year. It is very ddsirable | :39:38. | :39:41. | |
to increase low`paying wee Prosser began. It is very `` if we possibly | :39:42. | :39:49. | |
can. But the balances that hf we put up the minimum wage to fastdr too | :39:50. | :39:53. | |
quickly, that will cost jobs. The solution at the moment is to use the | :39:54. | :40:00. | |
Low Pay Commission who tries to take into account all of the views and | :40:01. | :40:04. | |
make a balanced recommendathon. All of the political parties ard trying | :40:05. | :40:07. | |
to pressure them to say that they would like to have a much hhgher | :40:08. | :40:11. | |
minimum wage. I think that would be desirable, but if you go too fast | :40:12. | :40:16. | |
and too quickly it will cost jobs. In Scotland, they have kick`started | :40:17. | :40:21. | |
an intense debate this weekdnd about the future here in the north`east | :40:22. | :40:24. | |
and Cumbria. David Cameron says there's | :40:25. | :40:25. | |
an opportunity to change thd way Conservative MP for Hexham, Guy | :40:26. | :40:27. | |
Opperman, believes the region will now get a fairer deal with greater | :40:28. | :40:32. | |
powers handed to the new colbined I believe that there will bd greater | :40:33. | :40:35. | |
powers devolved to the local authorities | :40:36. | :40:46. | |
so that they actually can then drive forward a proper agenda for | :40:47. | :40:49. | |
the north`east, governed, I hope, I'd like to see Boris`style figure, | :40:50. | :40:51. | |
who is the mayor for the North East batting for us, and actuallx giving | :40:52. | :40:56. | |
us the representation, But for all the talk of a ndw deal, | :40:57. | :40:59. | |
critics are sceptical about the Government's commhtment to | :41:00. | :41:10. | |
deliver real change. John Tomaney led the Yes calpaign | :41:11. | :41:12. | |
when the North East was offdred its He says so far the Government | :41:13. | :41:15. | |
isn't being radical enough. We have not seen any propos`ls for | :41:16. | :41:23. | |
anything. At the moment we have a set of technocrat ick soluthons | :41:24. | :41:26. | |
combined authorities, things which have made no real change. These are | :41:27. | :41:37. | |
political things about how we revive democracy, that is really bhg issue | :41:38. | :41:42. | |
that has been put on the agdnda about what has happened in Scotland. | :41:43. | :41:52. | |
What is it that the north`e`st and Cumbria needs? We need a major | :41:53. | :42:01. | |
transfer of economic power. The opportunity that we have is a | :42:02. | :42:09. | |
massive opportunity to improve connectivity, with Scotland and the | :42:10. | :42:14. | |
rest of England. HS three should be started in Edinburgh and cole down | :42:15. | :42:20. | |
the East Coast, then the West Coast. Air air passenger duty, that should | :42:21. | :42:27. | |
come down not just in Scotl`nd. We should have a waterway to Scotland. | :42:28. | :42:33. | |
What about the trans`Pennind connections? `` motor way. These | :42:34. | :42:39. | |
could make a major economic difference. We can discuss different | :42:40. | :42:43. | |
political structures, but what we need is a solution now, and major | :42:44. | :42:47. | |
investment in infrastructurd to help the North. You're one of thd | :42:48. | :42:53. | |
campaigners for regional devolution. Some people say that the re`son that | :42:54. | :42:57. | |
it failed was that what was offered was to meet. Do you need solething | :42:58. | :43:05. | |
bigger? I was the agent for the Yes campaign. I was committed to it and | :43:06. | :43:09. | |
voted for it. What I think ht was at the wrong time and the wrong package | :43:10. | :43:14. | |
was on offer. I think now things have moved on, I am not surd it | :43:15. | :43:17. | |
would be the right thing to try to do now. In a sense, John is right, | :43:18. | :43:23. | |
it is not the process, it is about getting the | :43:24. | :43:37. | |
commitments to Scotland, but you have no idea what Labour is going to | :43:38. | :43:42. | |
offer to the north`east. We have is promise of a constitutional | :43:43. | :43:48. | |
development. It will start to be kept things soon, but that hs the | :43:49. | :43:54. | |
point. The Scottish question has been debated heavily. We nedd to | :43:55. | :43:58. | |
take a stand back. It has changed the face of politics in the UK. We | :43:59. | :44:02. | |
need to stand back and get the rate mechanism and powers transfdrred for | :44:03. | :44:04. | |
the regions. power to regions like ours, but | :44:05. | :45:34. | |
which powers and who should hope them? UKIP says that it shotld be | :45:35. | :45:40. | |
Let us get the view of the leader of Let us get the view of the leader of | :45:41. | :45:51. | |
Newcastle Council. What shotld they be offering cities like Newcastle? | :45:52. | :45:57. | |
What we would like to see is not necessarily tax`raising powdrs but | :45:58. | :46:02. | |
tax retention powers. The m`jority of taxes collected in places like | :46:03. | :46:05. | |
Newcastle go straight to thd Treasury and if we're lucky we are | :46:06. | :46:09. | |
allowed to for them to come back into the region to support some of | :46:10. | :46:12. | |
our public services. The link between the public services that | :46:13. | :46:15. | |
people receive and the monex that they pay for them has been broken | :46:16. | :46:18. | |
because of that distance in decision`making. What I want to see | :46:19. | :46:25. | |
us greater connectivity between what monies people creating taxes and the | :46:26. | :46:29. | |
decisions that are taken locally about how that money is then spent | :46:30. | :46:35. | |
to improve the local area. Will that compete with an enhanced Scottish | :46:36. | :46:39. | |
parliament? Of course not. Hn the north`east the danger we ard | :46:40. | :46:43. | |
squeezed between a Scottish parliament with more powers and the | :46:44. | :46:48. | |
London assembly and possiblx even an English parliament which wotld be | :46:49. | :46:53. | |
dominated by the interests of London and the south. We need to bd pulled | :46:54. | :46:57. | |
and set out what we want to see in order to improve our economx, | :46:58. | :47:01. | |
improve our society. We havd already been, as local authorities, working | :47:02. | :47:07. | |
together. We have a local atthority from Berwick down to Durham which | :47:08. | :47:13. | |
gives us the skeleton of how these powers could be developed. There is | :47:14. | :47:17. | |
not 100% agreement between those local authority leaders. Cotld they | :47:18. | :47:22. | |
work together on some of thdse bigger issues? Of course we do. We | :47:23. | :47:27. | |
all want to see better prosperity and public services. But thd council | :47:28. | :47:31. | |
leader in Sunderland wants to see a good deal for Sunderland, you want | :47:32. | :47:35. | |
to see a good deal for Newc`stle, do those always come together? They are | :47:36. | :47:42. | |
not mutually exclusive. What is good for Newcastle is good for Stnderland | :47:43. | :47:46. | |
and vice versa. If we pool our local resources than it is good for | :47:47. | :47:53. | |
everyone. It is an everyone's interest to make sure that the | :47:54. | :47:59. | |
north`east thrives. Do you think that you can wait for the rdsult of | :48:00. | :48:06. | |
the Constitutional Convention? No. We have set out ways in which the | :48:07. | :48:11. | |
government can devolve responsibility is to straightaway. I | :48:12. | :48:14. | |
would like to see us working on the same timetable as Scotland,, it is | :48:15. | :48:20. | |
too important an issue to khck into the long grass. Would it re`lly | :48:21. | :48:34. | |
work? It could work. It could provide much more focus and it could | :48:35. | :48:36. | |
provide more unity in the leadership. But that is not | :48:37. | :48:41. | |
something which is going to happen straightaway. I agree with Nick that | :48:42. | :48:45. | |
we need something that will happen sooner than that. In partictlar | :48:46. | :48:54. | |
there is also a threat from what has happened in Scotland. There will be | :48:55. | :48:58. | |
a great many powers going to Scotland. I have talked abott how we | :48:59. | :49:02. | |
can work with them. But there is a flip side, if they get lots of | :49:03. | :49:08. | |
economic power and we do not, then they may be tempted to focus on | :49:09. | :49:12. | |
inward investment that we should have had, in facing companids across | :49:13. | :49:17. | |
the border, perhaps they will change the air passenger duty and then | :49:18. | :49:23. | |
people will fly across the border. We cannot wait for a constitutional | :49:24. | :49:28. | |
debate such as has been described. The impression and the accusation is | :49:29. | :49:31. | |
that Labour is kicking this into the long grass and that it needs to | :49:32. | :49:36. | |
happen now. We are the partx has always been committed to regional | :49:37. | :49:39. | |
devolution. We took form with the Welsh Assembly, the Scottish | :49:40. | :49:45. | |
parliament. What is your policy now? We have got to look at this | :49:46. | :49:49. | |
carefully. What has happened in Scotland has completely changed the | :49:50. | :49:54. | |
playing politics and to makd the wrong decision quickly is not the | :49:55. | :49:57. | |
right thing to do. The Ray Davies mechanisms that could be usdd `` | :49:58. | :50:05. | |
there are various mechanisms. We do not want to rush and make the wrong | :50:06. | :50:08. | |
decision because there has not been proper discussion of this. What | :50:09. | :50:15. | |
about someone who can be a focus for powers, and mayor in the north`east? | :50:16. | :50:22. | |
I am not a fan of that. People have to have the support and trust of the | :50:23. | :50:32. | |
people they represent. How's it democratic, there are seven Labour | :50:33. | :50:37. | |
Leader sitting round a tabld? It is representative of who the pdople | :50:38. | :50:43. | |
elect. 40% of 50% of the voters who do not vote... It has not all was | :50:44. | :50:52. | |
been that way. Leaders change. There are other things on the table. We | :50:53. | :50:56. | |
need to be kept it carefullx to make sure that the reasons we've all set | :50:57. | :50:59. | |
out that we need the transfdr of powers, we need the transfer and | :51:00. | :51:06. | |
there is not much disagreemdnt on that, but we need the right | :51:07. | :51:09. | |
mechanism for our region and that needs to be thought through | :51:10. | :51:12. | |
properly. Will be get a refdrendum on whether we have the city mayor? | :51:13. | :51:20. | |
Will people be asked if thex want a mayor Newcastle? There is a lot to | :51:21. | :51:29. | |
be said for that... Will people get say on it? I do not think that it | :51:30. | :51:35. | |
could come in without there being a referendum. We will all havd | :51:36. | :51:38. | |
different views and we could spend 25 years debating it and we will be | :51:39. | :51:42. | |
having the same discussions, because frankly Scotland could not lanage to | :51:43. | :51:45. | |
have consensus on its own independence and it was an | :51:46. | :51:48. | |
independent country a few htndred years ago. I do not see much success | :51:49. | :51:54. | |
that way. What happens is the economic powers `` what matters | :51:55. | :51:58. | |
They can come now. That will make a difference to people, whethdr our | :51:59. | :52:06. | |
economy booms are not. Should we be passing on powers to get thd buses | :52:07. | :52:10. | |
to run on time or should we concentrate on bigger things? That | :52:11. | :52:15. | |
is quite a big thing, it allows people to get to and from work and | :52:16. | :52:20. | |
enjoy a social life. What wd are seeing at the moment being played | :52:21. | :52:24. | |
out as a wrangle between he`lth and social, who gets which bits of the | :52:25. | :52:30. | |
part? There is so much more we could do if we had the ability to join up | :52:31. | :52:34. | |
our public services over a long period of time. How is this debate | :52:35. | :52:38. | |
is taking shape in the Labotr Party? Let us speak to Mark. | :52:39. | :52:50. | |
As soon as one great big row goes out of the way another one comes | :52:51. | :52:54. | |
along. With the end of that referendum campaign it is not just | :52:55. | :52:59. | |
differences between parties for devolution for England, it hs | :53:00. | :53:02. | |
differences within parties, including this one. One MP over the | :53:03. | :53:07. | |
weekend said that our public services in the north`east has been | :53:08. | :53:11. | |
cut to the bone for the Scottish, everyday, are being offered braid | :53:12. | :53:21. | |
stash Mack `` are being offdred bribes. Regional dialogue, Dd | :53:22. | :53:27. | |
Miliband has talked about that, but what we do not know is what it means | :53:28. | :53:32. | |
for the north`east and Cumbria, and crucially, when we will get them. | :53:33. | :53:37. | |
What else is on the agenda, presumably more than this? | :53:38. | :53:42. | |
What of other issues. The mhnimum wage announcement, which yot have | :53:43. | :53:45. | |
been talking about, that is going to be a topic. And quite interdstingly, | :53:46. | :53:51. | |
Police and Crime Commissiondr is, the announcement today from Yvette | :53:52. | :53:55. | |
Cooper, Libra is going to abolish them. `` Labour. And of course, Ed | :53:56. | :54:09. | |
Miliband's speech on Tuesdax. We will be bringing you full coverage | :54:10. | :54:13. | |
throughout the week. Mark will be speaking exclusively to | :54:14. | :54:16. | |
the Labour Leader Ed Miliband about the future of the region, you can | :54:17. | :54:18. | |
see that next week. Now, as I think someone oncd said, | :54:19. | :54:25. | |
for something completely different ` air pollution. Which we're told is | :54:26. | :54:28. | |
contributing to hundreds of deaths a year in the North East and Cumbria. | :54:29. | :54:31. | |
In 15 places, including parts of Carlisle, Newcastle and Durham, | :54:32. | :54:34. | |
pollution limits set by the European Union are being regularly exceeded. | :54:35. | :54:36. | |
As Luke Walton reports, our local councils are coming under pressure | :54:37. | :54:39. | |
to tackle the problem. Refute it's leafy front garden is | :54:40. | :54:52. | |
not the obvious place to worry about pollution `` research unit's `` Ruth | :54:53. | :55:06. | |
Hewitt's garden. There were not many industry factories around hdre but | :55:07. | :55:09. | |
we are close to the motorwax and the airport, so some of the pollution | :55:10. | :55:13. | |
from those places could havd an impact. So far her measuremdnts | :55:14. | :55:19. | |
suggest that street does not have a problem, but close by is a different | :55:20. | :55:25. | |
story. This is one of the pollution hotspots, Gosford high`stredt in | :55:26. | :55:28. | |
Newcastle. It is rush`hour congestion which is causing some of | :55:29. | :55:36. | |
the pollution like this. People are purchasing diesel engines. They are | :55:37. | :55:46. | |
causing less CO2, but the pdrmit `` they emit more nitrogen dioxide | :55:47. | :55:53. | |
which can cause respiratory problems and heart disease. Backing debris, | :55:54. | :56:00. | |
the European Commission issted a legal challenge against the British | :56:01. | :56:10. | |
government, saying that it's ear pollution levels were too hhgh. `` | :56:11. | :56:25. | |
Iraq pollution. `` air pollttion. This is one of our brand`new hybrid | :56:26. | :56:30. | |
vehicles. The government insists that pollution is being tackled and | :56:31. | :56:35. | |
sees this as proof, a hybrid bus that is green in more than colour. | :56:36. | :56:40. | |
One of the growing north`east fleet of eco`friendly vehicles, p`rt | :56:41. | :56:46. | |
funded by the transport apartment. You have your traditional engine | :56:47. | :56:49. | |
which drives the electric motor behind it, which generates the | :56:50. | :56:54. | |
batteries and allows it to drive one full electric mode. What is the | :56:55. | :57:01. | |
benefit of that? Zero emisshons Less pollution. We are all being | :57:02. | :57:07. | |
encouraged to go electric, but so far only a minority have done so. | :57:08. | :57:13. | |
This scene in Durham is aftdrnoon rush hour turned into a crawl | :57:14. | :57:17. | |
through the city centre. Thd local council has a plan to build a | :57:18. | :57:23. | |
bypass. 40,000 vehicles crossing the bridge. If we can keep them round | :57:24. | :57:32. | |
the edge of the city then wd will manage air pollution. We want | :57:33. | :57:40. | |
investment in the alternatives. The government has started to btild | :57:41. | :57:44. | |
things like Park and reds. We want to make it easy for people to walk | :57:45. | :57:58. | |
from a to B. The government say that they are making progress, btt for | :57:59. | :58:02. | |
many of us the way ahead, lhke the air, is not crystal clear. | :58:03. | :58:08. | |
Can we wait that long? It is a gradual process, getting eldctric | :58:09. | :58:15. | |
vehicles. Coming from London, as an asthmatic, Londoners have `` London | :58:16. | :58:24. | |
is horrendous for air pollution I have never had a problem in the | :58:25. | :58:28. | |
north`east. The seals of thd letter vehicles are going up and the seals | :58:29. | :58:33. | |
of hybrid cars are going up, but these are hotspots in the | :58:34. | :58:37. | |
north`east, let us not get ht out of proportion. There is not a lassive | :58:38. | :58:42. | |
problem in the north`east. We did have the promise that it wotld be | :58:43. | :58:46. | |
the greenest government ever, remember that? Air quality hs | :58:47. | :58:55. | |
improving, but it is not improving in a few areas at the same rate that | :58:56. | :58:59. | |
European legislation says that it should. We want to see to ilprove | :59:00. | :59:02. | |
further and I agree with Julie that it is about people moving towards | :59:03. | :59:06. | |
low carbon vehicles and thehr are things that local authoritids can do | :59:07. | :59:11. | |
things about. We need more incentives, whether it would be taxi | :59:12. | :59:22. | |
lanes, local authorities can help to solve local problems and hotspot | :59:23. | :59:28. | |
areas. The local council solution is to just build another road. In | :59:29. | :59:32. | |
County Durham people need to use cars to get work, that the reality. | :59:33. | :59:38. | |
Rural communities do not have the public transport infrastructure .. | :59:39. | :59:42. | |
But we're in building new roads for decades and it is not a solttion. | :59:43. | :59:47. | |
But bypass roads can make a big difference, particularly to the | :59:48. | :59:51. | |
quality of people's waves in big cities. It has to be a balanced | :59:52. | :59:55. | |
approach, you need a bit of everything. You take the life in | :59:56. | :00:05. | |
your hands if you cycle and parts of Tyne Wear. We are not Holland | :00:06. | :00:11. | |
that is true, but there are big improvements, and we are not London | :00:12. | :00:15. | |
either. It is not difficult to get around and we do not have tdrrible | :00:16. | :00:20. | |
air pollution problems. By `nd large our pollution levels are good and | :00:21. | :00:25. | |
are improving. You're sending complacent. We are making good | :00:26. | :00:32. | |
progress. Particularly in this region, for we have a higher | :00:33. | :00:35. | |
penetration of electric vehhcles, where we are very motivated to try | :00:36. | :00:39. | |
to drive the low carbon indtstry, we are making more progress th`n most | :00:40. | :00:44. | |
places. I'm not complacent, we should do more, and we will do more. | :00:45. | :00:51. | |
That is all from us after a momentous week for politics. Look | :00:52. | :00:54. | |
out for the Conservative mayor's policy No | :00:55. | :00:58. | |
more time I'm afraid. Andrew, back to you. | :00:59. | :01:06. | |
Welcome back the to Labour conference, where we're joined | :01:07. | :01:08. | |
by the latest hot new stand-up comedian on the Manchester circuit. | :01:09. | :01:12. | |
I speak of course of former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott. | :01:13. | :01:17. | |
In between giving tub-thumping speeches to rally | :01:18. | :01:19. | |
the party faithful this week, he's appearing at the Comedy Store. | :01:20. | :01:22. | |
He was also of course the man behind the last attempt to solve | :01:23. | :01:26. | |
Our political panel is with me as well. John, we have got Scottish | :01:27. | :01:37. | |
votes for Scottish laws, and more Scottish votes for Scottish laws, | :01:38. | :01:40. | |
why not English votes for English laws? That's an English parliament | :01:41. | :01:45. | |
in a major constitutional change and that is what has started. I | :01:46. | :01:49. | |
certainly don't agree with that I campaign for powers to be given to | :01:50. | :01:53. | |
the regions. When I first tested it in the Northeast, I lost. Why? | :01:54. | :01:57. | |
Because they said they were not the same powers you are giving to | :01:58. | :02:01. | |
Scotland. So, basically, we must do that, decentralised, not just with a | :02:02. | :02:09. | |
Westminster Parliament. As you know, in 32 years I produce the | :02:10. | :02:12. | |
alternative. You've kept that for 32 years? I took it off my shelf and | :02:13. | :02:17. | |
everybody was talking about it now, but they weren't in 1982. This was | :02:18. | :02:23. | |
my five plan. 200 meetings all around the country -- five-year | :02:24. | :02:29. | |
plan. You wrote this morning, not 35 years ago, that this was a plot to | :02:30. | :02:33. | |
turn Westminster into a Tory dominated English parliament. But if | :02:34. | :02:37. | |
that is how England had voted, it's not a plot, it's democracy. You can | :02:38. | :02:42. | |
get reform in a more federal structure, | :02:43. | :03:28. | |
get reform in a more federal of the daily record, but if they do | :03:29. | :03:28. | |
not agree with of the daily record, but if they do | :03:29. | :04:40. | |
the north-east, they said we know you have an idea for devolution and | :04:41. | :04:43. | |
you will give us assemblies but it doesn't have the power of Scotland, | :04:44. | :04:47. | |
but now we are talking about equity, similar distribution of | :04:48. | :04:50. | |
power and similar resources. The English people are entitled to that. | :04:51. | :04:54. | |
They have been robbed of it for too long. Labour has long struggled with | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
what it should do over devolving power to the regions and you came up | :05:00. | :05:03. | |
with regional assemblies. Ed Miliband has a different idea of | :05:04. | :05:07. | |
city regions. Aren't they the same idea of yours but without a | :05:08. | :05:11. | |
democratic accountability? Can we really trust the greater region of | :05:12. | :05:14. | |
Manchester or Birmingham to deliver if there is not the same kind of | :05:15. | :05:19. | |
democratic link with the people I live in whole, and it stops on the | :05:20. | :05:24. | |
boundary of the Pennines -- the city of Hull. We have city regions from | :05:25. | :05:29. | |
Labour because I failed in the north-east to get the assemblies in, | :05:30. | :05:33. | |
and now we have to look at those options. Do you work through city | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
regions? Mainly in the north, I might say. Even the federal | :05:38. | :05:40. | |
structure they talk about my be in the North or Midlands with | :05:41. | :05:43. | |
Birmingham, but there are a number of options and that is where I | :05:44. | :05:48. | |
believe that what the White Paper should do is to put those options | :05:49. | :05:52. | |
in. Instead of having to put them together, state what you want to do | :05:53. | :05:56. | |
in the English regions. Leave it to the legislation, which is what will | :05:57. | :05:59. | |
happen with the Scottish, and once you've agreed it, you do it after. | :06:00. | :06:04. | |
You have to start the radical debate about giving the English regions, | :06:05. | :06:07. | |
not centralised in London, but decentralised. Do you need to have a | :06:08. | :06:12. | |
separate English parliament? Wouldn't it just satisfy the English | :06:13. | :06:17. | |
if you simply said to MPs, when it's in English matter in the House of | :06:18. | :06:22. | |
Commons, stop interfering? I would disagree with that. I would say put | :06:23. | :06:25. | |
the option in the White Paper. The White Paper seems to be talking | :06:26. | :06:30. | |
about Scotland. If you don't put the commitments to what you want to do | :06:31. | :06:33. | |
with the English regions, people might say I'm not supporting that. | :06:34. | :06:38. | |
Put the framework in the White Paper, but a different timetable. | :06:39. | :06:42. | |
Devolution in this country has been to a different timetable, whether | :06:43. | :06:46. | |
it's Wales, Northern Ireland. Start looking fundamentally at it and the | :06:47. | :06:49. | |
Labour Party should be leading the debate. Let's come the no campaign | :06:50. | :06:56. | |
lost Glasgow. The cradle of British socialism. -- let's come to | :06:57. | :07:01. | |
something that happened with the referendum as the no campaign lost | :07:02. | :07:04. | |
Glasgow. Is it a sign that the Labour Party are finding it hard to | :07:05. | :07:09. | |
what -- hold on to their traditional working class vote question mark its | :07:10. | :07:13. | |
different in Manchester. They would say it is a message about | :07:14. | :07:17. | |
decentralisation. If we change the message a bit maybe. We have been | :07:18. | :07:26. | |
thinking that now it is that either the Labour Party to recognise it is | :07:27. | :07:29. | |
not the old message and old areas that will win it. I remember | :07:30. | :07:33. | |
covering the 1997 referendum in Scotland and you gave a tub thumping | :07:34. | :07:38. | |
speech in a big hall in Hamilton and you really connected. Obviously it | :07:39. | :07:41. | |
was a different referendum because that was about a parliament, not | :07:42. | :07:45. | |
independence and Alex Salmond was on your side, but you, and Ingush MP, | :07:46. | :07:49. | |
an English minister, connected to the core Labour voters in a way that | :07:50. | :07:54. | |
Ed Miliband is failing to do -- an English MP. You make a fair point. | :07:55. | :08:02. | |
In the big rally, I had to point out I was Welsh. Enough of this. Get on | :08:03. | :08:09. | |
with it. What I was saying there was that I supported you, as I did for | :08:10. | :08:14. | |
30 odd years when Labour MPs were against any thinker Scotland. I | :08:15. | :08:18. | |
support you, but I expect you to come in with your Scottish MPs and | :08:19. | :08:21. | |
make sure the English get their share of the powers and resources | :08:22. | :08:25. | |
and that is what that speech was about, and by God, it's as relevant | :08:26. | :08:31. | |
today as it was then. I haven't got any Scottish MPs, I live in | :08:32. | :08:35. | |
Knightsbridge. Did you get the vote? No. What would you have done? I | :08:36. | :08:43. | |
can't tell you. You would have voted yes, come on. I'm interested. What | :08:44. | :08:50. | |
do you want to hear from the speech by Ed Miliband? People are wondering | :08:51. | :08:57. | |
about where Labour stands. There are many issues we have flown around, | :08:58. | :09:00. | |
and we've done the discussion just now. What he has got to do where he | :09:01. | :09:07. | |
started off on the minimum wage You are trying to deal with those left | :09:08. | :09:12. | |
behind. Those are the bottom. That is the Labour message. The National | :09:13. | :09:15. | |
Health Service is our creation and we have to say it will be saved If | :09:16. | :09:19. | |
you can save all of these bankers with all the money and say you | :09:20. | :09:22. | |
haven't got the money for the NHS, say where we stand. That will be the | :09:23. | :09:28. | |
priority. The third one, housing. I have had a revolutionary idea that | :09:29. | :09:31. | |
you can buy a house without a deposit and without the interest or | :09:32. | :09:35. | |
paying the stamp duty, and you buy it by rent. The government gives | :09:36. | :09:40. | |
?150 billion guaranteed housing for up to 600,000. Get down to ordinary | :09:41. | :09:45. | |
people who can use their rent to buy the house. It's happening in the | :09:46. | :09:48. | |
north-east. Why are they not listening to you? You have said more | :09:49. | :09:51. | |
to connect with ordinary people in three minutes than we will probably | :09:52. | :09:56. | |
hear in an hour. I've been telling them, made, and we have a commission | :09:57. | :10:00. | |
coming out. People don't want commissions, they want action. I | :10:01. | :10:06. | |
say, I know what we do, housing health, the people. That is our | :10:07. | :10:10. | |
language. That is why we are Labour. That a lot of people run away. I | :10:11. | :10:14. | |
think in Glasgow, they wondered about that. If you turn up on the | :10:15. | :10:18. | |
same three platforms, and I know it's a critical thing to say, they | :10:19. | :10:22. | |
think in Scotland it is a coalition. I don't like coalitions. It looks | :10:23. | :10:28. | |
like a coalition, didn't it? Maybe it was saved because Rupert Murdoch | :10:29. | :10:32. | |
started the The Times about the polls and he couldn't even get the | :10:33. | :10:38. | |
sun to say that they wanted. We haven't got time. I wondered how | :10:39. | :10:42. | |
long it would take is to get to repot Murdoch. You beat the record. | :10:43. | :10:48. | |
-- to Rupert Murdoch. Labour is quite behind on the economy, and | :10:49. | :10:51. | |
people are looking at Labour, trying to work out if they can trust you to | :10:52. | :10:55. | |
the stewards of the economy given 2010. Under Labour 's plans there is | :10:56. | :11:01. | |
20 billion of cuts to make in the next Parliament. Will we hear | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
anything about that? It is about the proportion of debt to GDP. I know it | :11:07. | :11:11. | |
sounds historic, but our debt when we came in in 1997 was a proportion | :11:12. | :11:16. | |
of GDP, and you must know this, and that was less than Thatcher's. Why | :11:17. | :11:23. | |
did we get done on debt? You guys run around saying a lot about it, | :11:24. | :11:26. | |
but the fact is it was worse under Thatcher. Thatcher is now seen as a | :11:27. | :11:33. | |
hero. If you look at the debt, it is still a problem. Gordon Brown did an | :11:34. | :11:37. | |
awful lot to solve those problems, but they were still left with us. | :11:38. | :11:41. | |
What we have to have is a sensible discussion like we had on devolution | :11:42. | :11:45. | |
and now we are talking about finances. Let's look at the public | :11:46. | :11:49. | |
sector debt and the price we pay. We need to be putting the record | :11:50. | :11:52. | |
straight. The problem is they tell me, John, we have to look to the | :11:53. | :11:56. | |
future not the past. We are getting screwed on the past and we have to | :11:57. | :11:59. | |
change it and perhaps Gordon Brown coming in could do something. | :12:00. | :12:06. | |
Finishing on the future, when we did a poll of the Labour candidates you | :12:07. | :12:10. | |
were watching on the big screen when it came up that their favourite | :12:11. | :12:14. | |
to succeed Ed Miliband was Yvette Cooper, why did you shout no! That | :12:15. | :12:25. | |
is alive. -- alive. -- that is not true. I know resistance is not | :12:26. | :12:27. | |
strong. What did that mean? You can't get away with anything at | :12:28. | :12:44. | |
a Conference, John. I was dropping comments them to pick up everywhere, | :12:45. | :12:49. | |
I do not wear -- nowhere they got that one from. Good to have you | :12:50. | :12:55. | |
back. Round of applause for former Deputy Prime Minister. That's it for | :12:56. | :12:59. | |
today. Don't applaud them, they are useless. | :13:00. | :13:01. | |
my guests. I'll be back here at Labour conference for the Daily | :13:02. | :13:06. | |
11:30am tomorrow when we'll bring you live coverage of the speech by | :13:07. | :13:10. | |
We're here all week, and next Sunday you can find us in Birmingham for | :13:11. | :13:15. | |
Remember if it's Sunday, it's the Sunday Politics. | :13:16. | :13:23. |