Browse content similar to 22/06/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Welfare reform is one of the government's most popular policies. | :00:36. | :00:42. | |
So Labour says it would be even tougher than the Tories. | :00:43. | :00:46. | |
We'll be asking the Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary if she's got | :00:47. | :00:50. | |
Even Labour supporters worry that Ed Miliband hasn't got what it takes | :00:51. | :00:56. | |
Labour grandees are increasingly vocal about their concerns. | :00:57. | :01:01. | |
Over 50% of Labour voters think they'd do better with a new leader. | :01:02. | :01:12. | |
And what of this leader? He's apparently "toxic" on the doorstep. | :01:13. | :01:16. | |
In the South West: unpopular than Gordon Brown, | :01:17. | :01:20. | |
Could Cornwall lose millions if it's stopped from running | :01:21. | :01:22. | |
And the lawyers claiming legal `id cuts | :01:23. | :01:27. | |
promised an electric car revolution, why so little progress? | :01:28. | :01:40. | |
Nick Watt, Helen Lewis and Janan Ganesh, the toxic tweeters | :01:41. | :01:47. | |
First, the deepening crisis in Iraq, where Sunni Islamists are now | :01:48. | :01:55. | |
largely in control of the Syrian-Iraq border, which means | :01:56. | :01:57. | |
they can now re-supply their forces in Iraq from their Syrian bases | :01:58. | :02:03. | |
Rather than moving on Baghdad, they are for the moment consolidating | :02:04. | :02:06. | |
their grip on the towns and cities they've already taken. | :02:07. | :02:09. | |
They also seem to be in effective control of Iraq's | :02:10. | :02:11. | |
biggest oil refinery, which supplies the capital. | :02:12. | :02:15. | |
And there are reports they might now have taken the power | :02:16. | :02:17. | |
Iraqi politicians are now admitting that ISIS, | :02:18. | :02:24. | |
the name of the Sunni insurgents, is better trained, better equipped and | :02:25. | :02:27. | |
far more battle-hardened than the US-trained Iraqi army fighting it. | :02:28. | :02:32. | |
Which leaves the fate of Baghdad increasingly in the hands | :02:33. | :02:35. | |
No good news coming out of there, Janan. No good news and no good | :02:36. | :02:53. | |
options either. The West's best strategy is to decide how much | :02:54. | :02:57. | |
support to give to the Iraqi government. The US is sending over | :02:58. | :03:02. | |
about 275 military personnel. Do they go further and contemplate | :03:03. | :03:05. | |
their support? General Petraeus argued against it as it might be | :03:06. | :03:11. | |
seen as the US serving as the force of Shia Iraqis -- continue their | :03:12. | :03:17. | |
support. Do we contemplate breaking up Iraq? It won't be easy. The Sunni | :03:18. | :03:26. | |
and Shia Muslim populations don t live in clearly bordered areas, but | :03:27. | :03:29. | |
in the longer term, do we deal with it in the same way we dealt with the | :03:30. | :03:33. | |
break-up of the Ottoman empire over 100 years ago? In the short-term and | :03:34. | :03:38. | |
long-term, completely confounding. Quite humiliating. If ISIS take | :03:39. | :03:45. | |
Baghdad I can't think of a bigger ignominy for foreign policy since | :03:46. | :03:51. | |
Suez. If Iraq is partitioned, it won't be up to us. It will be what | :03:52. | :03:55. | |
is happening because of what is happening on the ground. Everything | :03:56. | :04:01. | |
does point to partition, and that border, which ISIS control, between | :04:02. | :04:07. | |
Syria and Iraq, that has been there since it was drawn during the First | :04:08. | :04:12. | |
World War. That is gone as well An astonishingly humbling situation the | :04:13. | :04:15. | |
West, and you can see the Kurds in the North think this is a charge -- | :04:16. | :04:24. | |
chance for authority. They think this is the chance to get the | :04:25. | :04:27. | |
autonomy they felt they deserved a long time. Janan is right. We can't | :04:28. | :04:33. | |
do much in the long term, but we have to decide on the engagement. | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
And the other people wish you'd be talking turkey, because if there is | :04:38. | :04:40. | |
some blowback and the fighters come back, they are likely to come back | :04:41. | :04:45. | |
from Turkey. Where is Iran in all of this? There were reports last week | :04:46. | :04:49. | |
that the Revolutionary guard, the head of it, he was already in | :04:50. | :04:53. | |
Baghdad with 67 advisers and there might have been some brigades that | :04:54. | :04:57. | |
have gone there as well. Where are they? What has happened? I'm pretty | :04:58. | :05:03. | |
sure the Prime Minister of Iraq is putting more faith in Iran than the | :05:04. | :05:14. | |
White House and the British. I think they are running the show, in | :05:15. | :05:18. | |
technical terms. John Kerry is flying into Cairo this morning, and | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
what is his message? It is twofold. One is to Arab countries, do more to | :05:23. | :05:26. | |
encourage an inclusive government in Iraq, mainly Sunni Muslims in the | :05:27. | :05:31. | |
government, and the Arab Gulf states should stop funding insurgents in | :05:32. | :05:36. | |
Iraq. You think, Iraq, it's potentially going to break up, so | :05:37. | :05:41. | |
this sounds a bit late in the day and a bit weak. It gets | :05:42. | :05:45. | |
fundamentally to the problem, what can we do? Niall Ferguson has a big | :05:46. | :05:49. | |
piece in the Sunday Times asking if this is place where we cannot doing | :05:50. | :05:53. | |
anything. He doesn't want to do anything. By the way, that is what | :05:54. | :05:58. | |
most Americans think. That is what opinion polls are showing. You have | :05:59. | :06:03. | |
George Osborne Michael Gold who would love to get involved but they | :06:04. | :06:07. | |
cannot because of the vote in parliament on Syria lasted -- George | :06:08. | :06:10. | |
Osborne and Michael Gove. This government does not have the stomach | :06:11. | :06:15. | |
for military intervention. We will see how events unfold on the ground. | :06:16. | :06:18. | |
All parties are agreed that Britain's 60-year old multi-billion | :06:19. | :06:21. | |
The Tory side of the Coalition think their reforms are necessary | :06:22. | :06:26. | |
and popular, though they haven't always gone to time or to plan. | :06:27. | :06:29. | |
In the eight months she's had since she became Shadow Secretary of State | :06:30. | :06:33. | |
for Work and Pensions, Rachel Reeves has talked the talk about getting | :06:34. | :06:40. | |
people off benefits, into work and lowering the overall welfare bill. | :06:41. | :06:42. | |
her first interview in the job she threatened "We would | :06:43. | :06:45. | |
But Labour has opposed just about every change the Coalition | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
has proposed to cut the cost and change the culture of welfare. | :06:50. | :06:53. | |
Child benefit, housing benefit, the ?26,000 benefit cap - | :06:54. | :06:56. | |
They've been lukewarm about the government's flagship Universal | :06:57. | :07:02. | |
Credit scheme - which rolls six benefit payments into one - and | :07:03. | :07:05. | |
And Labour has set out only two modest welfare cuts. | :07:06. | :07:12. | |
This week, Labour said young people must have skills or be in training | :07:13. | :07:16. | |
That will save ?65 million, says Labour, though the cost | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
And cutting winter fuel payments for richer pensioners which will | :07:22. | :07:27. | |
Not a lot in a total welfare bill of around ?200 billion. | :07:28. | :07:34. | |
And with welfare cuts popular among even Labour voters, they will soon | :07:35. | :07:37. | |
have to start spelling out exactly what Labour welfare reform means. | :07:38. | :07:44. | |
Welcome. Good morning. Why do you want to be tougher than the Tories? | :07:45. | :07:57. | |
We want to be tough in getting the welfare bill down. Under this | :07:58. | :08:00. | |
government, the bill will be ?1 million more than the government set | :08:01. | :08:04. | |
out in 2010 and I don't think that is acceptable. We should try to | :08:05. | :08:09. | |
control the cost of Social Security. But the welfare bill under the next | :08:10. | :08:13. | |
Labour government will fall? It will be smaller when you end the first | :08:14. | :08:17. | |
parliament than when you started? We signed up to the capping welfare but | :08:18. | :08:21. | |
that doesn't see social security costs ball, it sees them go up in | :08:22. | :08:27. | |
line with with inflation or average earnings -- costs fall. So where | :08:28. | :08:32. | |
flair will rise? We have signed up to the cap -- welfare will rise We | :08:33. | :08:37. | |
have signed up to the cap. We will get the costs under control and they | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
haven't managed to achieve it. The government is spending ?13 billion | :08:42. | :08:44. | |
more on Social Security and the reason they are doing it is because | :08:45. | :08:49. | |
the minimum wage has not kept pace with the cost of living so people | :08:50. | :08:53. | |
are reliant on tax credits. They are not building houses and people are | :08:54. | :08:57. | |
relying on housing benefit. We have a record number of people on zero | :08:58. | :09:03. | |
hours contracts. I'm still not clear if you will cut welfare if you get | :09:04. | :09:07. | |
in power. Nobody is saying that the cost of welfare is going to fall. | :09:08. | :09:13. | |
The welfare cap sees that happening gradually. That is a Tory cap. And | :09:14. | :09:18. | |
you've accepted it. You're being the same as the Tories, not to. If they | :09:19. | :09:25. | |
had a welfare cap, they would have breached it in every year of the | :09:26. | :09:29. | |
parliament. Social Security will be higher than the government set out | :09:30. | :09:34. | |
because they failed to control it. You read the polls, and the party | :09:35. | :09:37. | |
does lots of its own polling, and you're scared of being seen as the | :09:38. | :09:40. | |
welfare party. You don't really believe all of this anti-welfare | :09:41. | :09:47. | |
stuff? We are the party of work not welfare. The Labour Party was set up | :09:48. | :09:50. | |
in the first place because we believe in the dignity of work and | :09:51. | :09:52. | |
we believe that work should pay wages can afford to live on. I make | :09:53. | :09:56. | |
no apologies for being the party of work. We are not the welfare party, | :09:57. | :10:01. | |
we are the party of work. Even your confidential strategy document | :10:02. | :10:06. | |
admits that voters don't trust you on immigration, the economy, this is | :10:07. | :10:09. | |
your own people, and welfare. You are not trusted on it. The most | :10:10. | :10:14. | |
recent poll showed Labour slightly ahead of the Conservative Party on | :10:15. | :10:17. | |
Social Security, probably because they have seen the incompetence and | :10:18. | :10:22. | |
chaos at the Department for Work and Pensions under Iain Duncan Smith. | :10:23. | :10:26. | |
Your own internal document means that the voters don't trust you on | :10:27. | :10:32. | |
welfare reform. That is why we have shown some of this tough things we | :10:33. | :10:35. | |
will do like the announcement that Ed Miliband made earlier this week, | :10:36. | :10:40. | |
that young people without basic qualifications won't be entitled to | :10:41. | :10:44. | |
just sign on for benefits, they have to sign up for training in order to | :10:45. | :10:47. | |
receive support. That is the right thing to do by that group of young | :10:48. | :10:50. | |
people, because they need skills to progress. We will, once that. - we | :10:51. | :11:00. | |
will, onto that. You say you criticise the government that it had | :11:01. | :11:05. | |
a cap and wouldn't have met it, but every money-saving welfare reform, | :11:06. | :11:09. | |
you voted against it. How is that being tougher? The most recent bout | :11:10. | :11:16. | |
was the cap on overall welfare expenditure, and we went through the | :11:17. | :11:20. | |
lobbies and voted for the Tories. You voted against the benefit cap, | :11:21. | :11:25. | |
welfare rating, you voted against, child benefit schemes, you voted | :11:26. | :11:30. | |
against. You can't say we voted against everything when we voted | :11:31. | :11:32. | |
with the Conservatives in the most recent bill with a cap on Social | :11:33. | :11:36. | |
Security. It's just not correct to say. The last time we voted, we | :11:37. | :11:43. | |
walked through the lobby with them. You voted on the principle of the | :11:44. | :11:50. | |
cap. You voted on every step that would allow the cap to be met. Every | :11:51. | :11:55. | |
single one. The most recent vote was not on the principle of the cap it | :11:56. | :11:58. | |
was on a cap of Social Security in the next Parliament and we signed up | :11:59. | :12:01. | |
for that. It was Ed Miliband who called her that earlier on. Which | :12:02. | :12:06. | |
welfare reform did you vote for We voted for the cap. Other than that? | :12:07. | :12:13. | |
We have supported universal credit. You voted against it in the third | :12:14. | :12:18. | |
reading. We voted against some of the specifics. If you look at | :12:19. | :12:23. | |
universal credit, they have had to write off nearly ?900 million of | :12:24. | :12:28. | |
spending. I'm not on the rights and wrongs, I'm trying to work out what | :12:29. | :12:32. | |
you voted for. Some of the things we are going to go further than the | :12:33. | :12:35. | |
government with. For example, cutting benefits for young people | :12:36. | :12:41. | |
who don't sign of the training. The government had introduced that. For | :12:42. | :12:43. | |
example, saying that the richest pensioners should not get the winter | :12:44. | :12:46. | |
fuel allowance, that is something the government haven't signed up. | :12:47. | :12:50. | |
You would get that under Labour and this government haven't signed up | :12:51. | :12:54. | |
for it. ?100 million on the winter fuel allowance and ?65 million on | :12:55. | :13:00. | |
youth training. ?165 million. How big is the welfare budget? The cap | :13:01. | :13:05. | |
would apply to ?120 billion. And you've saved 125 -- 165 million | :13:06. | :13:13. | |
Those are cuts that we said we would do in government. If you look at the | :13:14. | :13:18. | |
real prize from the changes Ed Miliband announced in the youth | :13:19. | :13:21. | |
allowance, it's not the short-term savings, it's the fact that each of | :13:22. | :13:25. | |
these young people, who are currently on unemployment benefits | :13:26. | :13:27. | |
without the skills we know they need to succeed in life, they will cost | :13:28. | :13:34. | |
the taxpayer ?2000 per year. I will come onto that. You mentioned | :13:35. | :13:38. | |
universal credit, which the government regards as the flagship | :13:39. | :13:42. | |
reform. It's had lots of troubles with it and it merges six benefits | :13:43. | :13:48. | |
into one. You voted against it in the third reading and given lukewarm | :13:49. | :13:51. | |
support in the past. We have not said he would abandon it, but now | :13:52. | :13:57. | |
you say you are for it. You are all over the place. We set up the rescue | :13:58. | :14:01. | |
committee in autumn of last year because we have seen from the | :14:02. | :14:04. | |
National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee, report after | :14:05. | :14:09. | |
report showing that the project is massively overbudget and is not | :14:10. | :14:14. | |
going to be delivered according to the government timetable. We set up | :14:15. | :14:18. | |
the committee because we believe in the principle of universal credit | :14:19. | :14:20. | |
and think it is the right thing to do. Can you tell us now if you will | :14:21. | :14:25. | |
keep it or not? Because there is no transparency and we have no idea. We | :14:26. | :14:31. | |
are awash with information. We are not. The government, in the most | :14:32. | :14:37. | |
recent National audit Forest -- National Audit Office statement said | :14:38. | :14:42. | |
it was a reset project. This is really important. This is a flagship | :14:43. | :14:47. | |
government programme, and it's going to cost ?12.8 billion to deliver, | :14:48. | :14:52. | |
and we don't know what sort of state it is in, so we have said that if we | :14:53. | :14:56. | |
win at the next election, we will pause that for three months and | :14:57. | :15:03. | |
calling... Will you stop the pilots? We don't know what status they will | :15:04. | :15:08. | |
have. We would stop the build of the system for three months, calling the | :15:09. | :15:12. | |
National Audit Office to do awards and all report. The government don't | :15:13. | :15:18. | |
need to do this until the next general election, they could do it | :15:19. | :15:21. | |
today. Stop throwing good money after bad and get a grip of this | :15:22. | :15:25. | |
incredibly important programme. You said you don't know enough to a view | :15:26. | :15:30. | |
now. So when you were invited to a job centre where universal credit is | :15:31. | :15:34. | |
being rolled out to see how it was working, you refused to go. Why We | :15:35. | :15:40. | |
asked were a meeting with Iain Duncan Smith and he cancelled the | :15:41. | :15:43. | |
meeting is three times. I'm talking about the visit when you were | :15:44. | :15:46. | |
offered to go to a job centre and you refused. We had an appointment | :15:47. | :15:51. | |
to meet Iain Duncan Smith at the Department for Work and Pensions and | :15:52. | :15:53. | |
said he cancelled and was not available, but he wanted us to go to | :15:54. | :15:58. | |
the job centre. We wanted to talk to him and his officials, which she | :15:59. | :16:03. | |
did. Would it be more useful to go to the job centre and find out how | :16:04. | :16:06. | |
it was working. He's going to tell you it's working fine. | :16:07. | :16:20. | |
Advice Bureau in Hammersmith, they are working to help the people | :16:21. | :16:26. | |
trying to claim universal credit. Iain Duncan Smith cancelled three | :16:27. | :16:33. | |
meetings. That is another issue I was asking about the job centre It | :16:34. | :16:38. | |
is not another issue because Iain Duncan Smith fogged us off. This | :16:39. | :16:44. | |
week you said that jobless youngsters who won't take training | :16:45. | :16:48. | |
will lose their welfare payments. How many young people are not in | :16:49. | :16:57. | |
work training or education? There are 140,000 young people claiming | :16:58. | :17:02. | |
benefits at the moment, but 850 000 young people who are not in work at | :17:03. | :17:08. | |
the moment. This applies to around 100,000 young people. There are | :17:09. | :17:16. | |
actually 975,000, 16-24 -year-olds, not in work, training or education. | :17:17. | :17:23. | |
Your proposal only applies to 100,000 of them, why? This is | :17:24. | :17:30. | |
applying to young people who are signing on for benefits rather than | :17:31. | :17:35. | |
signing up for training. We want to make sure that all young people .. | :17:36. | :17:43. | |
Why only 100,000? They are the ones currently getting job-seeker's | :17:44. | :17:47. | |
allowance. We are saying you can not just sign up to... Can I get you to | :17:48. | :18:00. | |
respond to this, the number of people not in work, training or | :18:01. | :18:06. | |
education fell last year by more than you are planning to help. Long | :18:07. | :18:42. | |
education fell last year by more address that problem to make sure | :18:43. | :18:45. | |
all young people have the skills they need to get a job. Your policy | :18:46. | :18:50. | |
is to take away part of the dole unless young unemployed people agree | :18:51. | :18:55. | |
to study for level three qualifications, the equivalent of an | :18:56. | :19:01. | |
AS-level or an NVQ but 40% of these people have the literary skills of a | :19:02. | :19:04. | |
nine-year-old. After all that failed nine-year-old. After all that failed | :19:05. | :20:38. | |
went back to college because he wanted to get the skills. He said | :20:39. | :20:42. | |
that it wasn't until he went back to college that he could pick up a | :20:43. | :20:47. | |
newspaper and read it, it made a huge difference but too many people | :20:48. | :20:53. | |
are let down by the system. I am wondering how the training will make | :20:54. | :20:57. | |
up for an education system that failed them but let's move on to | :20:58. | :21:02. | |
your leader. Look at this graph of Ed Miliband's popularity. This is | :21:03. | :21:08. | |
the net satisfaction with him, it is dreadful. The trend continues to | :21:09. | :21:12. | |
climb since he became leader of the Labour Party, why? What you have | :21:13. | :21:18. | |
seen is another 2300 Labour councillors since Ed Miliband became | :21:19. | :21:22. | |
the leader of the Labour Party. You saw in the elections a month ago | :21:23. | :21:30. | |
that... Why is the satisfaction rate falling? We can look at polls or | :21:31. | :21:35. | |
actual election results and the fact that we have got another 2000 Labour | :21:36. | :21:40. | |
councillors, more people voting Labour, the opinion polls today show | :21:41. | :21:45. | |
that if there was a general election today we would have a majority of | :21:46. | :21:49. | |
more than 40, he must be doing something right. Why do almost 0% | :21:50. | :21:57. | |
of voters want to replace him as leader? Why do 50% and more think | :21:58. | :22:04. | |
that he is not up to the job? The more people see Ed Miliband, the | :22:05. | :22:10. | |
less impressed they are. The British people seem to like him less. The | :22:11. | :22:15. | |
election strategy I suggest that follows from that is that you should | :22:16. | :22:20. | |
keep Ed Miliband under wraps until the election. Let's look at actually | :22:21. | :22:25. | |
what happens when people get a chance to vote, when they get that | :22:26. | :22:30. | |
opportunity we have seen more Labour councillors, more Labour members of | :22:31. | :22:36. | |
the European Parliament... Oppositions always get more. The | :22:37. | :22:43. | |
opinion polls today, one of them shows Labour four points ahead. You | :22:44. | :22:47. | |
have not done that well in local government elections or European | :22:48. | :22:52. | |
elections. Why don't people like him? I think we have done incredibly | :22:53. | :22:58. | |
well in elections. People must like a lot of the things Labour and Ed | :22:59. | :23:03. | |
Miliband are doing because we are winning back support across the | :23:04. | :23:07. | |
country. We won local councils in places like Hammersmith and Fulham, | :23:08. | :23:12. | |
Crawley, Hastings, key places that Labour need to win back at the | :23:13. | :23:18. | |
general election next year. Even you have said traditional Labour | :23:19. | :23:23. | |
supporters are abandoning the party. That is what Ed Miliband has said as | :23:24. | :23:28. | |
well. We have got this real concern about what has happened. If you look | :23:29. | :23:34. | |
at the elections in May, 60% of people didn't even bother going to | :23:35. | :23:39. | |
vote. That is a profound issue not just for Labour. You said | :23:40. | :23:43. | |
traditional voters who perhaps at times we took for granted are now | :23:44. | :23:48. | |
being offered an alternative. Why did you take them for granted? This | :23:49. | :23:54. | |
is what Ed Miliband said. I am not saying anything Ed Miliband himself | :23:55. | :24:00. | |
has not said. When he ran for the leadership he said that we took too | :24:01. | :24:05. | |
many people for granted and we needed to give people positive | :24:06. | :24:09. | |
reasons to vote Labour, he has been doing that. He has been there for | :24:10. | :24:13. | |
four years and you are saying you still take them for granted. Why? I | :24:14. | :24:17. | |
am saying that for too long we have taken them for granted. We are on | :24:18. | :24:22. | |
track to win the general election next year and that will defy all the | :24:23. | :24:31. | |
odds. You are going to win... Ed Miliband will win next year and make | :24:32. | :24:34. | |
a great Prime Minister. Now to the Liberal Democrats, at the | :24:35. | :24:42. | |
risk of intruding into private grief. The party is still smarting | :24:43. | :24:46. | |
from dire results in the European and Local Elections. The only poll | :24:47. | :24:49. | |
Nick Clegg has won in recent times is to be voted the most unpopular | :24:50. | :24:53. | |
leader of a party in modern British history. No surprise there have been | :24:54. | :24:58. | |
calls for him to go, though that still looks unlikely. Here's | :24:59. | :24:59. | |
Eleanor. Liberal Democrats celebrating, | :25:00. | :25:02. | |
something we haven't seen for a while. This victory back in 199 led | :25:03. | :25:08. | |
to a decade of power for the Lib Dems in Liverpool. What a contrast | :25:09. | :25:13. | |
to the city's political landscape today. At its height the party had | :25:14. | :25:19. | |
69 local councillors, now down to just three. The scale of the | :25:20. | :25:23. | |
challenge facing Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems is growing. The party is | :25:24. | :25:29. | |
rock bottom in the polls, consistently in single figures. It | :25:30. | :25:33. | |
was wiped out in the European elections losing all but one of its | :25:34. | :25:38. | |
12 MEPs and in the local elections it lost 42% of the seats that it was | :25:39. | :25:45. | |
defending. But on Merseyside, Nick Clegg was putting on a brave face. | :25:46. | :25:51. | |
We did badly in Liverpool, Manchester and London in particular, | :25:52. | :25:56. | |
we did well in other places. But you are right, we did badly in some of | :25:57. | :26:02. | |
those big cities and I have initiated a review, quite | :26:03. | :26:06. | |
naturally, to understand what went wrong, what went right. As Lib Dems | :26:07. | :26:12. | |
across the country get on with some serious soul-searching, there is an | :26:13. | :26:16. | |
admission that his is the leader of the party who is failing to hit the | :26:17. | :26:21. | |
right notes. Knocking on doors in Liverpool, I have to tell you that | :26:22. | :26:26. | |
Nick Clegg is not a popular person. Some might use the word toxic and I | :26:27. | :26:32. | |
find this very difficult because I know Nick very well and I see a | :26:33. | :26:35. | |
principal person who passionately believes in what he is doing and he | :26:36. | :26:41. | |
is a nice guy. As a result of his popularity, what has happened to the | :26:42. | :26:52. | |
core vote? In parts of the country, we are down to just three | :26:53. | :26:55. | |
councillors like Liverpool for example. You also lose the | :26:56. | :27:00. | |
deliverers and fundraisers and the organisers and the members of course | :27:01. | :27:04. | |
so all of that will have to be rebuilt. As they start fermenting | :27:05. | :27:09. | |
process, local parties across the country and here in Liverpool have | :27:10. | :27:14. | |
been voting on whether there should be a leadership contest. We had two | :27:15. | :27:20. | |
choices to flush out and have a go at Nick Clegg or to positively | :27:21. | :27:25. | |
decide we would sharpen up the campaign and get back on the | :27:26. | :27:30. | |
streets, and by four to one ratio we decided to get back on the streets. | :27:31. | :27:35. | |
We are bruised and battered but we are still here, the orange flag is | :27:36. | :27:41. | |
still flying and one day it will fly over this building again, Liverpool | :27:42. | :27:46. | |
town hall. But do people want the Lib Dems back in charge in this | :27:47. | :27:51. | |
city? I certainly wouldn't vote for them. Their performance in | :27:52. | :27:55. | |
Government and the way they have left their promises down, I could | :27:56. | :28:00. | |
not vote for them again. I voted Lib Dem in the last election because of | :28:01. | :28:06. | |
the university tuition fees and I would never vote for them again | :28:07. | :28:12. | |
because they broke their promise. The Lib Dems are awful, broken | :28:13. | :28:15. | |
promises and what have you. I wouldn't vote for them. This is the | :28:16. | :28:19. | |
declaration of the results for the Northwest... Last month, as other | :28:20. | :28:24. | |
party celebrated in the north-west, the Lib Dems here lost their only | :28:25. | :28:29. | |
MEP, Chris Davies. Now there is concern the party doesn't know how | :28:30. | :28:34. | |
to turn its fortunes around. We don't have an answer to that, if we | :28:35. | :28:40. | |
did we would be grasping it with both hands. We will do our best to | :28:41. | :28:48. | |
hold onto the places where we still have seats but as for the rest of | :28:49. | :28:53. | |
the country where we have been hollowed out, we don't know how to | :28:54. | :28:57. | |
start again until the next general election is out of the way. After | :28:58. | :29:01. | |
their disastrous performance in the European elections, pressure is | :29:02. | :29:04. | |
growing for the party to shift its stance. I think there has to be a | :29:05. | :29:15. | |
lancing of the wound, there should in a referendum and the Liberal | :29:16. | :29:22. | |
Democrats should be calling it. The rest of Europe once this because | :29:23. | :29:26. | |
they are fed up with Britain being unable to make up its mind. The Lib | :29:27. | :29:32. | |
Dems are now suffering the effects of being in Government. The party's | :29:33. | :29:37. | |
problem, choosing the right course to regain political credibility | :29:38. | :29:44. | |
We can now speak to form a Lib Dems leader Ming Campbell. Welcome back | :29:45. | :29:49. | |
to the Sunday Politics. Even your own activists say that Nick Clegg is | :29:50. | :29:55. | |
toxic. How will that change between now and the election? When you have | :29:56. | :29:59. | |
had disappointing results, but you have to do is to rebuild. You pick | :30:00. | :30:04. | |
yourself up and start all over again, and the reason why the | :30:05. | :30:09. | |
Liberal Democrats got 57, 56 seats in the House of Commons now is | :30:10. | :30:14. | |
because we picked ourselves up, we took every opportunity and we have | :30:15. | :30:16. | |
rebuilt from the bottom up. least popular leader in modern | :30:17. | :30:28. | |
history and more unpopular than your mate Gordon Brown. You are running | :30:29. | :30:33. | |
out of time. No one believes that being the leader of a modern | :30:34. | :30:37. | |
political party in the UK is an easy job. Both Ed Miliband and David | :30:38. | :30:41. | |
Cameron must have had cause to think, over breakfast this morning, | :30:42. | :30:45. | |
when they saw the headlines in some of the Sunday papers. Of course it | :30:46. | :30:48. | |
is a difficult job but it was pointed out a moment or two ago that | :30:49. | :30:53. | |
Nick Clegg is a man of principle and enormous resilience if you consider | :30:54. | :30:56. | |
what he had to put up with, and in my view, he is quite clearly the | :30:57. | :31:00. | |
person best qualified to lead the party between now and the general | :31:01. | :31:03. | |
election and through the election campaign, and beyond. So why don't | :31:04. | :31:09. | |
people like him? We have had to take some pretty difficult decisions | :31:10. | :31:13. | |
and, of course, people didn't expect that. If you look back to the rather | :31:14. | :31:20. | |
heady days of the rose garden behind ten Downing St, people thought it | :31:21. | :31:23. | |
was all going to be sweetness and light, but the fact is, we didn t | :31:24. | :31:27. | |
know then what we know now, about the extent of the economic crisis we | :31:28. | :31:31. | |
win, and a lot of difficult decisions have had to be taken in | :31:32. | :31:35. | |
order to restore economic stability. Look around you. You will see we are | :31:36. | :31:40. | |
not there yet but we are a long way better off than in 2010. You are not | :31:41. | :31:44. | |
getting the credit for it, the Tories are. We will be a little more | :31:45. | :31:52. | |
assertive about taking the credit. For example, the fact that 23 | :31:53. | :31:56. | |
million people have had a tax cut of ?800 per year and we have taken 2 | :31:57. | :32:00. | |
million people out of paying tax altogether. Ming Campbell, your | :32:01. | :32:03. | |
people say that on every programme like this. Because it is true. That | :32:04. | :32:10. | |
might be the case, but you are at seven or 8% in the polls, and nobody | :32:11. | :32:14. | |
is listening, or they don't believe it. Once | :32:15. | :32:22. | |
is listening, or they don't believe doubt that what we have achieved | :32:23. | :32:23. | |
will be much more easily recognised, and there is no doubt, | :32:24. | :32:27. | |
for example, in some of the recent polls, like the Ashcroft Pole, | :32:28. | :32:31. | |
something like 30% of those polled said that as a result at the next | :32:32. | :32:39. | |
something like 30% of those polled general election, they would prepare | :32:40. | :32:41. | |
their to be a coalition involving the Liberal Democrats. So there is | :32:42. | :32:46. | |
no question that the whole notion of coalition is still very much a live | :32:47. | :32:50. | |
one, and one which we have made work in the public interest. The problem | :32:51. | :32:54. | |
is people don't think that. People see you trying to have your cake and | :32:55. | :32:58. | |
eat it. On the one hand you want to get your share of the credit for the | :32:59. | :33:01. | |
turnaround in the economy, on the other hand you can't stop yourself | :33:02. | :33:05. | |
from distancing yourself from the Tories and things that you did not | :33:06. | :33:09. | |
like happening. You are trying to face both ways at once. If you | :33:10. | :33:15. | |
remember our fellow Scotsman famously said you cannot ride both | :33:16. | :33:28. | |
remember our fellow Scotsman to the terms -- terms of the | :33:29. | :33:28. | |
remember our fellow Scotsman coalition agreement, which is what | :33:29. | :33:30. | |
we signed up to in 2010. In addition, in furtherance of that | :33:31. | :33:34. | |
agreement, we have created things like the pupil premium and the | :33:35. | :33:37. | |
others I mentioned and you were rather dismissive. I'm not | :33:38. | :33:41. | |
dismissive, I'm just saying they don't make a difference to what | :33:42. | :33:45. | |
people think of you. We will do everything in our power to change | :33:46. | :33:50. | |
that between now and May 2015. The interesting thing is, going back to | :33:51. | :33:56. | |
the Ashcroft result, it demonstrated clearly that in constituencies where | :33:57. | :34:01. | |
we have MPs and we are well dug in, we are doing everything that the | :34:02. | :34:05. | |
public expects of us, and we are doing very well indeed. You aren't | :34:06. | :34:10. | |
sure fellow Lib Dems have been saying this for you -- you and your | :34:11. | :34:15. | |
fellow Liberal Dems have been saying this for a year or 18 months, and | :34:16. | :34:19. | |
since then you have lost all of your MEPs apart from one, you lost your | :34:20. | :34:22. | |
deposit in a by-election, you lost 310 councillor, including everyone | :34:23. | :34:29. | |
in Manchester or Islington. Mr Clegg leading you into the next general | :34:30. | :34:34. | |
election will be the equivalent of the charge of the light Brigade I | :34:35. | :34:40. | |
doubt that very much. The implication behind that lit you | :34:41. | :34:44. | |
rehearsed is that we should pack our tents in the night and steal away. | :34:45. | :34:49. | |
-- that litany. And if you heard in that piece that preceded the | :34:50. | :34:52. | |
discussion, people were saying, look we have to start from the bottom and | :34:53. | :34:56. | |
have to rebuild. That is exactly what we will do. Nine months is a | :34:57. | :35:10. | |
period of gestation. As you well know. I wouldn't dismiss it quite so | :35:11. | :35:16. | |
easily as that. I'm not here to say we had a wonderful result or | :35:17. | :35:19. | |
anything like it, but what I do say is that the party is determined to | :35:20. | :35:24. | |
turn it round, and that Nick Clegg is the person best qualified to do | :35:25. | :35:30. | |
it. Should your party adopt a referendum about in or out on | :35:31. | :35:35. | |
Europe? No, we should stick to the coalition agreement. If there is any | :35:36. | :35:37. | |
transfer of power from Westminster to Brussels, that will be subject to | :35:38. | :35:43. | |
a referendum. No change. And finally, as a Lib Dem, you must be | :35:44. | :35:48. | |
glad you are not fighting the next election yourself? I've fought every | :35:49. | :35:54. | |
election since 1974, so I've had a few experiences, some good, some | :35:55. | :36:00. | |
bad, but the one thing I have done and the one thing a lot of other | :36:01. | :36:03. | |
people have done is that they have stuck to the task, and that is what | :36:04. | :36:07. | |
will happen in May 2015. Ming Campbell, thank you for joining us. | :36:08. | :36:11. | |
It's just gone 11.35am, you're watching the Sunday Politics. | :36:12. | :36:13. | |
We say goodbye to viewers in Scotland who leave us now | :36:14. | :36:16. | |
stranger to that kind of rulour while Mr Gilbert declared there was | :36:17. | :37:06. | |
more chance of him joining NASA and becoming the first man on M`rs than | :37:07. | :37:09. | |
joining the Tories. Anything is possible with the help of the Sunday | :37:10. | :37:12. | |
Politics graphics department. Defections or no defections, Robin, | :37:13. | :37:15. | |
underlying this of course is the fact that, undeniably, it is not a | :37:16. | :37:19. | |
great time, electorally, to be a Lib Dem, is it? | :37:20. | :37:22. | |
Well, it hasn't been in the last month, certainly not with the | :37:23. | :37:26. | |
elections, local elections `nd by`election, but we have thd next | :37:27. | :37:31. | |
year towards the general eldction, we can start again, we are ` party | :37:32. | :37:34. | |
government, and we have to persuade people of the great things we have | :37:35. | :37:39. | |
done in government, the libdral agenda that we have deliverdd. And | :37:40. | :37:42. | |
have got a great programme `head of us, and I think we can do that, | :37:43. | :37:46. | |
although we have the Lord Ashcroft poll that also tells us that... | :37:47. | :37:49. | |
We going to talk about that, yes. ..Things are difficult. | :37:50. | :37:51. | |
Particularly in Cornwall, yds. What | :37:52. | :37:52. | |
Liberal Democrats are resilhent and Lord Ashcroft always makes that | :37:53. | :37:56. | |
point, and he always says there s absolutely no complacency | :37:57. | :37:58. | |
Conservative Party and my mdssage to the Conservative Party is absolutely | :37:59. | :38:01. | |
right. OK. They will be grateful for that, no doubt. But having Steph | :38:02. | :38:07. | |
here from UKIP as well, it strikes me, looking at recent electhons and | :38:08. | :38:10. | |
looking at that particular poll it does look as if, while you `re going | :38:11. | :38:15. | |
down on one side of the seesaw, UKIP almost in mirror image seem to be | :38:16. | :38:20. | |
going up. Well, of course, we have become the... We're in government, | :38:21. | :38:25. | |
we're the party of responsibility, we're delivering, actually | :38:26. | :38:28. | |
things in power. UKIP is thd party very much of none of the rest, | :38:29. | :38:32. | |
perhaps we were to some degree. Though, yes, UKIP has done very well | :38:33. | :38:37. | |
recently. I suspect they won't do nearly as well in the gener`l | :38:38. | :38:40. | |
election coming up, but thex will have their effect, there no doubt | :38:41. | :38:43. | |
about that. It's a problem potentially, isn't it, Steph, that | :38:44. | :38:46. | |
absolutely right that there was a protest party which attractdd people | :38:47. | :38:52. | |
previously which happened to be called the Lib Dems, now thdy are in | :38:53. | :38:55. | |
government, if you like, in some people's eyes they are tainted with | :38:56. | :39:00. | |
government in some ways in the same way as Labour and the | :39:01. | :39:03. | |
Conservatives. Now you are the protest party. They might not be | :39:04. | :39:05. | |
particularly interested in xour views. I think there are two points | :39:06. | :39:11. | |
here. Firstly, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and I'm | :39:12. | :39:17. | |
sure you were delighted to hear a party chairman say that wd are | :39:18. | :39:21. | |
learning from the Lib Dems, because they have been very effective | :39:22. | :39:23. | |
I think the other factor th`t is coming into play is that more people | :39:24. | :39:29. | |
are realising, a lot of people in Cornwall vote Liberal Delocrat | :39:30. | :39:32. | |
thinking they are from the original Liberal party, and they are not | :39:33. | :39:35. | |
as socially democratic in their thinking, so I think it is dasier | :39:36. | :40:01. | |
for them to come to us rathdr than perhaps go elsewhere, when they are | :40:02. | :40:04. | |
I don't think the Liberal Ddmocrats are going to be wiped out, but I do | :40:05. | :40:09. | |
think there is going to be ` significant change, and I think next | :40:10. | :40:12. | |
year's general election is going to be really interesting, becatse I am | :40:13. | :40:15. | |
sure we will get some MPs and of course it depends how thd other | :40:16. | :40:18. | |
parties pan out, the balancd of power, may not lead to many seats. | :40:19. | :41:32. | |
Liberal Democrats who signed up for that did break that pledge, | :41:33. | :41:41. | |
no doubt about that, and Nick Clegg has apologised for that. | :41:42. | :41:43. | |
The irony is that actually the way the regime has turned ott is | :41:44. | :41:47. | |
actually much better for sttdents as it has turned out in terms of paying | :41:48. | :41:50. | |
back, and we have a lot of support from the student community now. | :41:51. | :41:53. | |
They all move on, but, yeah, it was... | :41:54. | :41:55. | |
There were a lot of lessons to be learnt from the coalition. | :41:56. | :41:58. | |
I'm glad I've got two representatives from Cornwall here | :41:59. | :42:04. | |
today, because Cornwall is dmbarking on its third tranche | :42:05. | :42:06. | |
That is a mixed blessing, bdcause it means, after nearly 15 years of | :42:07. | :42:12. | |
support, Cornwall is still one of the poorest places in the whole EU. | :42:13. | :42:15. | |
It is also a year late getthng started and a battle is unddr | :42:16. | :42:18. | |
Here's Scott Bingham. is managed locally in Cornw`ll. | :42:19. | :43:59. | |
On a visit to the Aerohub in the last week, | :44:00. | :44:04. | |
the Minister for local growth played down the concerns, saying that | :44:05. | :44:08. | |
local enterprise partnerships, or LEPs, would continue to decide | :44:09. | :44:13. | |
I don't know anybody on the LEP from central | :44:14. | :44:39. | |
Everybody on the LEP is frol local councils, local representathves | :44:40. | :44:42. | |
It is actually led by busindsses, so that is about as devolved | :44:43. | :44:46. | |
as you could possibly get, as far as I am concerned. | :44:47. | :44:49. | |
And the chairman of Cornwall's LEP seemed relatively happy with that | :44:50. | :44:51. | |
If it is agreed then give us the authority to spend it. | :44:52. | :44:56. | |
Most of our leaders are either from the local authority or they are | :44:57. | :44:59. | |
That is what the minister s`id he was going to do, so if we hold | :45:00. | :45:04. | |
Whether the rest of Cornwall's business community are convhnced | :45:05. | :45:08. | |
There is concern too that the move towards a national | :45:09. | :45:11. | |
operation programme flies in the face of government preaching | :45:12. | :45:14. | |
on localism and Cornwall's `mbition for devolution. | :45:15. | :45:15. | |
But when EU cash has alreadx created around 25,000 jobs in the county, | :45:16. | :45:18. | |
much more than national pride at stake. | :45:19. | :45:21. | |
I think it is fair to say that the Lib Dems and UKIP, like the | :45:22. | :45:25. | |
Conservatives, are theoretically very keen on the notion of localism. | :45:26. | :45:27. | |
Steph, I mean, you sit on Cornwall Council. | :45:28. | :45:43. | |
Would you like to see this programme | :45:44. | :45:44. | |
administerd locally? Absolttely and I do that ask to see thd | :45:45. | :45:47. | |
agreed to sign the letter of two sure that actually it is more | :45:48. | :46:06. | |
effective when the money is delivered locally. | :46:07. | :46:08. | |
But one of the big problems has been with the huge amount | :46:09. | :46:11. | |
People see money spent as an outcome, as a successful outcome. | :46:12. | :46:15. | |
A few ask a business, to see how well they are dohng, | :46:16. | :46:18. | |
they don't look that expendhture, they looked at profit, they look | :46:19. | :46:21. | |
at income, and what we have absolutely got to do this thme is | :46:22. | :46:24. | |
make sure this round of EU funding delivers the outcome we need. | :46:25. | :46:27. | |
Clearly it hasn't, as you s`id in your introduction, the Cornish | :46:28. | :46:30. | |
economy has gone backwards, despite half a billion here. | :46:31. | :46:32. | |
Somebody got something very wrong with that. | :46:33. | :46:33. | |
There have been some successful programmes. | :46:34. | :46:36. | |
OK, it was Robin who was involved right at | :46:37. | :46:38. | |
But just quickly, I take it you are not impressed | :46:39. | :46:45. | |
answer to this issue of loc`l management, that essentiallx even | :46:46. | :46:53. | |
if it is administered in London essentially all | :46:54. | :47:03. | |
the decisions would be made by the LEP in Cornwall? | :47:04. | :47:10. | |
I want to see much more loc`l control, because it is much more | :47:11. | :47:20. | |
likely that we will actuallx get the outcomes we need, which is | :47:21. | :47:23. | |
growth in the Cornish econoly, not how much is spent, but what does | :47:24. | :47:26. | |
OK, Robin, I take it, you are nodding, you also think that the | :47:27. | :47:33. | |
whole thing should be running Cornwall? Yes. Absolutely. Ht came | :47:34. | :47:36. | |
as a question in the House of Lords yesterday actually. One of the | :47:37. | :47:39. | |
things that came out was th`t the government minister Baroness Stahl | :47:40. | :47:42. | |
said very strongly that it would be administered in Cornwall, apart from | :47:43. | :47:44. | |
checking eligibility. Now, `s the UK Government take all the rap on if | :47:45. | :47:48. | |
it is spent wrong, then I don't disagree with that, but I think we | :47:49. | :47:51. | |
have got to be very careful about language here. I congratulate Steph | :47:52. | :47:54. | |
on signing the letter with the other group leaders to impress on the | :47:55. | :47:58. | |
government that this is really, really important, that the let and | :47:59. | :48:03. | |
government that this is really, really important, that the LEP and | :48:04. | :48:05. | |
local authority have decision`making powers on this. The governmdnt, I | :48:06. | :48:11. | |
think, from a ministerial point of view, is convinced they havd | :48:12. | :48:14. | |
delivered on that. What I think they have got to be very careful about is | :48:15. | :48:17. | |
what the civil servants acttally do behind that. And because thdre is so | :48:18. | :48:25. | |
much of this jargon and process stuff around European funding. Once | :48:26. | :48:27. | |
it hits the shores of the UK that we had to be very careful that a real | :48:28. | :48:42. | |
decision is backed down. Have you got the sense of who is right at the | :48:43. | :48:46. | |
moment, because the governmdnt is saying, well, don't worry, | :48:47. | :48:52. | |
officially administered in London, but all the decision`making is in | :48:53. | :48:55. | |
Cornwall. And you have got people in Cornwall saying we are going to | :48:56. | :49:10. | |
absolutely certain is that Europe says this, and the | :49:11. | :49:12. | |
government has confirmed it, the money is has been ring fencdd, it | :49:13. | :49:15. | |
has to be spent in Cornwall. It has to be spent in Cornwall and the | :49:16. | :49:18. | |
Isles of Scilly. I think, to be honest, the ministers actually | :49:19. | :49:21. | |
believe they have delivered what Cornwall once. The danger is that | :49:22. | :49:24. | |
the process in terms of civhl servants and doesn't actually quite | :49:25. | :49:31. | |
get to that, that Tina Stahl, the Minister, said very specifically | :49:32. | :49:34. | |
that there will be complete decision`making on the programme at | :49:35. | :49:36. | |
Cornish level. I don't take that for granted. I am not as naive `s that. | :49:37. | :49:40. | |
I'm sure Steph doesn't, either. But ministers have stated that, and it | :49:41. | :49:43. | |
is on the record, it is on Hansard, and I think that is at least a step | :49:44. | :49:47. | |
towards it, we have just got to keep out absolutely vigilant on this | :49:48. | :49:50. | |
Steph, as you are a UKIP councillor, I must make the point | :49:51. | :49:53. | |
that obviously none of this money would be here at all if we work | :49:54. | :49:56. | |
outside the EU, which you would like to see. If we were outside of the | :49:57. | :50:00. | |
EU, all the money would say here. We are net contributors. Well, it | :50:01. | :50:03. | |
wouldn't necessarily be in Cornwall, would it? Now. It depends on | :50:04. | :50:06. | |
electing the right people to Westminster, doesn't it? We have got | :50:07. | :50:08. | |
all six of our Cornish MPs `re net members of the government. Governing | :50:09. | :50:11. | |
parties, and we are not necdssarily getting as much of a positive | :50:12. | :50:14. | |
response from central government as we would like, so if we can't.. A | :50:15. | :50:17. | |
few look at the lobbying power of the small number of MPs we have got, | :50:18. | :50:21. | |
and I don't think Robin would disagree, with this, whichever party | :50:22. | :50:24. | |
is actually in government, ht doesn't actually bring us more | :50:25. | :50:26. | |
funding for local authoritids, more funding for the police, so far | :50:27. | :50:29. | |
better rail and road links, does it? So it is difficult to imagine that | :50:30. | :50:32. | |
any domestic government would be giving that type of money to | :50:33. | :50:35. | |
Cornwall. But half a billion of EU funding, our money returned, hasn't | :50:36. | :50:37. | |
delivered those that growth in the Cornish economy that we are looking | :50:38. | :50:40. | |
for, either, has it? It hasn't made a huge difference. . It has made a | :50:41. | :50:44. | |
huge difference. If it hadn't been there, we wotld be | :50:45. | :50:46. | |
far, far further back. The whole history of the Cornish economy since | :50:47. | :50:49. | |
the end of the Industrial Rdvolution and the has been an defence cuts and | :50:50. | :50:53. | |
that sort of side, has been Cornwall dividing further and further and | :50:54. | :50:55. | |
further away from the rest of the UK. That was reasonably stopped and | :50:56. | :50:59. | |
actually we crept well out of the, for a few years, the category of | :51:00. | :51:02. | |
being in it, so we. I didn't want us to have aid for another further | :51:03. | :51:06. | |
term, because we should havd been in the right place. In the last two | :51:07. | :51:09. | |
years, yes, we have moved b`ckwards, but I think that might be something | :51:10. | :51:12. | |
to do with the grand recesshon that we have had, and the fact that. . We | :51:13. | :51:16. | |
have all had the grand recession... You can't use that one... No, no, no | :51:17. | :51:19. | |
I mean let's not be naive hdre. Peripheral areas outside of the | :51:20. | :51:22. | |
south`east suffer far more from the recession, look at the north`east of | :51:23. | :51:25. | |
England, look at parts of W`les And if we could just move forward with | :51:26. | :51:28. | |
the programme. If you look `t the amount of money that is just added | :51:29. | :51:31. | |
to GDP from the campus, the university campus, a lot of | :51:32. | :51:34. | |
well`paid jobs, the construction of the building, the maintenance, the | :51:35. | :51:37. | |
students, the accommodation, the bars, the clubs, and so on. All of | :51:38. | :51:39. | |
that is added to GDP and we have still gone backwards. Yes. Dxactly. | :51:40. | :51:43. | |
That proves my point, doesn't it? Because that was only there for | :51:44. | :51:45. | |
because of EU funding. So if that wasn't there, it would be absolutely | :51:46. | :51:49. | |
worse. OK. Stephanie. You h`ve proved my point. OK. We do need to | :51:50. | :51:52. | |
move on with. Criminal lawydrs in Devon are refusing to take on new | :51:53. | :51:55. | |
legal aid cases in protest at funding cuts. Thd | :51:56. | :51:57. | |
industrial action means somd people are appearing in the county's courts | :51:58. | :52:00. | |
without legal representation. The lawyers say they are making the | :52:01. | :52:02. | |
important point that the government the government's plans to slice 18% | :52:03. | :52:05. | |
of the legal aid budget aid budget could soon mean the poor ard denied | :52:06. | :52:08. | |
access to justice permanently. Jenny Cooper reports. Since April, a | :52:09. | :52:10. | |
number of cases across Devon have been delayed or disrupted bdcause | :52:11. | :52:13. | |
defendants have been left whthout a lawyer to represent them. Criminal | :52:14. | :52:16. | |
lawyers in the county have been refusing to take legal aid cases, | :52:17. | :52:19. | |
because of a row with the government. They are protesting | :52:20. | :52:21. | |
against government plans for a 7.5% cut in fees for solicitors. Fewer | :52:22. | :52:24. | |
legal aid contracts for four work at least a sense police stations, and | :52:25. | :52:27. | |
an average 6% fee cut for barristers. Only last week, a man | :52:28. | :52:30. | |
appeared here at Exeter Crown Court accused of harassing Fiona LcEwan, | :52:31. | :52:32. | |
the mother of Scarlett Keeldy, who was killed in Goa six years ago But | :52:33. | :52:36. | |
there was no one to represent him because criminal lawyers across | :52:37. | :52:38. | |
Devon are taking part in industrial action in protest at legal `id cuts. | :52:39. | :52:42. | |
So, the hearing has been delayed, and the defendant was released on | :52:43. | :52:44. | |
bail. This lawyer was asked to take on the case, but he explaindd to the | :52:45. | :52:48. | |
judge why he couldn't. Given that I have had a lifetime, a workhng | :52:49. | :52:51. | |
lifetime, of doing this, to turn round to those who need my help and | :52:52. | :52:55. | |
say that I am not prepared to help them, it really goes very mtch | :52:56. | :52:58. | |
against the grain, and I find it very difficult. But you havd decided | :52:59. | :53:01. | |
to take part in the action. What drives you, why are you doing it, | :53:02. | :53:04. | |
despite the fact that it gods against your values? Becausd if I | :53:05. | :53:07. | |
and others in my position do not do so now the situation is simply going | :53:08. | :53:14. | |
to get worse. Devon is only one of a handful of areas in the country | :53:15. | :53:18. | |
where this is happening. In Hull, it has had a big impact. It has caused | :53:19. | :53:23. | |
a catalogue of delays and forced all's senior judge, Jeremy | :53:24. | :53:26. | |
Richardson, to issue unprecddented guidance on how courts should | :53:27. | :53:32. | |
proceed. This is the first indication that it is causing | :53:33. | :53:36. | |
significant problems. What this is designed to demonstrate is what life | :53:37. | :53:44. | |
will be like in the criminal justice system if the government gets its | :53:45. | :53:48. | |
way with these particular proposals. Campaigners in Ddvon | :53:49. | :53:53. | |
admit that things aren't quhte as serious as they are in whold. But | :53:54. | :53:57. | |
they want the court could grind to a halt if the protest continuds. This | :53:58. | :54:06. | |
firm focuses entirely on dohng criminal legal aid work but the | :54:07. | :54:08. | |
partners here say they will have to close if the cuts continue. I'm | :54:09. | :54:16. | |
depressed and frustrated and sad. I went to a comprehensive school. I do | :54:17. | :54:24. | |
legal aid work because I thhnk it is important and because it provides | :54:25. | :54:28. | |
me with a living, but I can't do it on thin air. I can't run a business | :54:29. | :54:32. | |
being paid legal aid rates which don't allow me to pay my st`ff. | :54:33. | :54:35. | |
There is also concern about the impact of the cuts on wider society. | :54:36. | :54:47. | |
The purpose of the welfare state is for society to look after the | :54:48. | :54:54. | |
accused of crime or who havd difficulties with their employment | :54:55. | :54:57. | |
or their housing or they have been injured to be able to seek redress | :54:58. | :55:02. | |
and to take legal advice on that, and to be represented. But `cross | :55:03. | :55:05. | |
the board, all of those are`s have been decimated in the last two | :55:06. | :55:19. | |
years. In a statement, the Linistry of Justice says. But the delays | :55:20. | :55:22. | |
caused by any boycott may actually end up costing the government money. | :55:23. | :55:25. | |
Robin. This is very concernhng, isn't it? yes. It is, actually. I | :55:26. | :55:29. | |
would agree with that. A fundamental part of democracy is access to | :55:30. | :56:00. | |
justice. But we also have a problem in that the country has got pretty | :56:01. | :56:03. | |
bankrupt back in 2010, and legal aid costs the country, us as | :56:04. | :56:14. | |
individuals, ?2 billion and this programme is to try to shavd, not | :56:15. | :56:17. | |
a decimation of it, but abott 2 0 million of it, which is abott 1 % of | :56:18. | :56:20. | |
that money. So you have to get a balance there. I actually think that | :56:21. | :56:24. | |
is the wrong thing to cut in terms of the Justice budget. To md, it is | :56:25. | :56:27. | |
ridiculous that we keep 85,000 people in work in this country in | :56:28. | :56:30. | |
jail. Which is 50% more than any equivalent countries like France and | :56:31. | :56:33. | |
Italy. But in terms of this issue, we still have the most expensive, | :56:34. | :56:36. | |
one of the most expensive ldgal aid systems in the world. That hs not | :56:37. | :56:40. | |
just rhetoric. I have looked at the figures. It is true. And so we have | :56:41. | :56:43. | |
a real dilemma here. Whether this is exactly the right solution, I don't | :56:44. | :57:01. | |
know. But we had to pay it back in some way. OK. Steph, | :57:02. | :57:04. | |
mean, you get is very proud of the British justice system. Are you | :57:05. | :57:08. | |
concerned about these cuts? Yes in the sense that there is a rhsk to | :57:09. | :57:11. | |
people and the law, as Robin says, should apply to everybody, dverybody | :57:12. | :57:14. | |
should have access, it shouldn't depend on whether you can afford to | :57:15. | :57:17. | |
employ somebody in the legal profession. But it is getting out of | :57:18. | :57:20. | |
hand, the level of debt in this country, I mean, you know, this | :57:21. | :57:23. | |
government is making some ilpact on reducing the deficit and thd economy | :57:24. | :57:26. | |
seems to be growing. Would xou make the cut in this place? We would | :57:27. | :57:29. | |
actually look at it differently and go for cutting the CPS. We didn t | :57:30. | :57:33. | |
used to have a CPS. We spending a fortune on that? OK. We havd got to | :57:34. | :57:36. | |
move on to our round`up of people to go weak. In just 60 seconds. A very | :57:37. | :57:40. | |
philosophical question therd. Devon County Council decides to close 20 | :57:41. | :57:43. | |
care homes and 17 day centrds to save ?12 million. Unions sax 10 0 | :57:44. | :57:46. | |
jobs are at risk. The counchl has made quite a brash decision. It is | :57:47. | :57:49. | |
going to impact greatly on the community. And staff who | :57:50. | :58:01. | |
provide those front line services. Outspoken top`line MP and GP Sarah | :58:02. | :58:05. | |
Weatherstone is elected to chair the Commons Health Committee. The NHS | :58:06. | :58:08. | |
touches peoples lives a million times every 36 hours. It is the most | :58:09. | :58:11. | |
extraordinary achievement and also the most extraordinary challenge. | :58:12. | :58:20. | |
Meanwhile, in the wake of the winter's floods, the | :58:21. | :58:25. | |
Commons Environment Committde tells the government to spend a lot more | :58:26. | :58:28. | |
money on preventive work. Wd are spending more in this parli`ment | :58:29. | :58:31. | |
than any previous government has done. ?3.2 billion on flood | :58:32. | :58:47. | |
defences. And Plymouth MP and former life guard Alison Seabeck shgns up | :58:48. | :58:50. | |
the Royal life saving Society's campaign to reduced drowning. | :58:51. | :59:00. | |
Steph. Is the government grhpping the flood problems efficiently? | :59:01. | :59:02. | |
Probably not sufficiently. @t least it does appear to be taking it | :59:03. | :59:05. | |
seriously, but too little too late, I think. Sums it up. They h`ve been | :59:06. | :59:08. | |
calling for maintenance of the flood defences, the dredging and so on, | :59:09. | :59:11. | |
for so long, and why did it take the severe weather of last wintdr for | :59:12. | :59:15. | |
the government really to st`nd up and take notice? Robin are xou going | :59:16. | :59:18. | |
to defend the government? Well, no, I want to say | :59:19. | :59:19. | |
information, you can apply to them and they will be obliged to tell | :59:20. | :59:24. | |
you. Thanks for joining us. Andrew, back to you. | :59:25. | :59:42. | |
think you'd want to. Labour grandees are not queueing up to sing his | :59:43. | :59:47. | |
praises. Look at this. In my view, he is the leader we have and he is | :59:48. | :59:52. | |
the leader I support and he is somebody capable of leading the | :59:53. | :59:56. | |
party to victory. Ed Miliband will leave this to victory, and I believe | :59:57. | :00:02. | |
he can. If he doesn't, what would happen to the Labour Party? We could | :00:03. | :00:07. | |
be in the wilderness for 15 years. At the moment he has to convince | :00:08. | :00:11. | |
people he has the capacity to lead the country. That's not my view but | :00:12. | :00:17. | |
people don't believe that. We had a leader of the Labour Party was | :00:18. | :00:19. | |
publicly embarrassed, because whoever was in charge of press | :00:20. | :00:26. | |
letting go through a process where we have councillors in Merseyside | :00:27. | :00:36. | |
resigning. It was a schoolboy error. Having policies without them being | :00:37. | :00:39. | |
drawn together into a convincing and vivid narrative and with what you do | :00:40. | :00:50. | |
the people in the country. You have to draw together, connect the | :00:51. | :00:55. | |
policies, link them back to the leader and give people a real sense | :00:56. | :01:02. | |
of where you are going. Somehow he has never quite managed to be | :01:03. | :01:08. | |
himself and create that identity with the public. And we are joined | :01:09. | :01:14. | |
by the president of you girls, Peter Kellner. Welcome to the Sunday | :01:15. | :01:24. | |
politics. -- YouGov. The Labour Party is six points ahead in your | :01:25. | :01:29. | |
poll this morning. So what is the problem? On this basis he will win | :01:30. | :01:33. | |
the next election. If the election were today and the figures held up, | :01:34. | :01:36. | |
you would have a Labour government with a narrow overall majority. One | :01:37. | :01:41. | |
should not forget that. Let me make three points. The first is, in past | :01:42. | :01:48. | |
parliaments, opposition normally lose ground and governments gain | :01:49. | :01:53. | |
ground in the final few months. The opposition should be further ahead | :01:54. | :01:56. | |
than this. I don't think six is enough. Secondly, Ed Miliband is | :01:57. | :02:02. | |
behind David Cameron when people are asked who they want as Prime | :02:03. | :02:05. | |
Minister and Labour is behind the Conservatives went people are asked | :02:06. | :02:09. | |
who they trust on the economy. There have been elections when the party | :02:10. | :02:12. | |
has won by being behind on leadership and other elections where | :02:13. | :02:16. | |
they have won by being behind on the economy. No party has ever won an | :02:17. | :02:21. | |
election when it has been clearly behind on both leadership and the | :02:22. | :02:26. | |
economy. Let me have another go The Labour Party brand is a strong | :02:27. | :02:29. | |
brand. The Tory Bramleys week. The Labour brand is stronger. That is a | :02:30. | :02:36. | |
blast -- the Labour -- the Tory Bramleys week. A lot of the Tories | :02:37. | :02:46. | |
-- the Tory brand is weak. Cant you win on policies and a strong party | :02:47. | :02:54. | |
brand? If you have those too, you need the third factor which isn t | :02:55. | :02:57. | |
there. People believing that you have what it takes, competent | :02:58. | :03:02. | |
skills, determination, determination, whatever makes to | :03:03. | :03:09. | |
carry through. -- whatever mix. A lot of Ed Miliband policies, on the | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
banks, energy prices, Brent controls, people like them. But in | :03:16. | :03:19. | |
government, would they carry them through? They think they are not up | :03:20. | :03:24. | |
to it. -- rent controls. If people think you won't deliver what you | :03:25. | :03:29. | |
say, even if they like it, they were necessarily vote for you. That is | :03:30. | :03:33. | |
the missing third element. There is a strong Labour brand, but it's not | :03:34. | :03:38. | |
strong enough to overcome the feeling that the Labour leadership | :03:39. | :03:44. | |
is not up to it. Nick, you had some senior Labour figure telling you | :03:45. | :03:48. | |
that if Mr Miliband losing the next election he will have to resign | :03:49. | :03:52. | |
immediately and cannot fight another election the way Neil Kinnock did | :03:53. | :03:57. | |
after 1987. What was remarkable to me was that people were even | :03:58. | :03:59. | |
thinking along these lines, and even more remarkable that they would tell | :04:00. | :04:03. | |
you they were thinking along these lines? What is the problem? The | :04:04. | :04:10. | |
problem is, is that Ed Miliband says it would be unprecedented to win the | :04:11. | :04:16. | |
general election after the second worst result since 1918. They are | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
concerned about is the start of a script that he would say on the day | :04:21. | :04:23. | |
after losing the general election. Essentially what the people are | :04:24. | :04:26. | |
trying to do is get their argument in first and to say, you cannot do | :04:27. | :04:31. | |
what Neil Kinnock did in 1987. Don't forget that Neil Kinnock in 198 was | :04:32. | :04:35. | |
in the middle of a very brave process of modernisation and had one | :04:36. | :04:40. | |
and fought a very campaign that was professional but he lost again in | :04:41. | :04:44. | |
1992, and they wanted to get their line in first. What some people are | :04:45. | :04:50. | |
saying is that this is an election that the Labour Party should be | :04:51. | :04:53. | |
winning because the coalition is so unpopular. If you don't win, I'm | :04:54. | :04:56. | |
afraid to say, there is something wrong with you. Don't you find it | :04:57. | :05:00. | |
remarkable that people are prepared to think along these lines at this | :05:01. | :05:03. | |
stage, when Labour are ahead in the polls, still the bookies favourite | :05:04. | :05:07. | |
to win, and you start to speak publicly, or in private to the | :05:08. | :05:12. | |
public print, but we might have to get rid of him if he doesn't win. | :05:13. | :05:17. | |
Everything you say about labour in this situation has been said about | :05:18. | :05:19. | |
the Tories. We wondered whether Boris Johnson would tie himself to | :05:20. | :05:23. | |
the mask and he is the next leader in waiting if Cameron goes. It's a | :05:24. | :05:28. | |
mirror image of that. We talk about things being unprecedented. It's | :05:29. | :07:19. | |
mirror image of that. We talk about and they could make the changes I | :07:20. | :07:22. | |
find it odd that they are being so defeatist. Don't go away. Peter is a | :07:23. | :07:28. | |
boffin when it comes to polls. That is why we have a mod for the | :07:29. | :07:33. | |
election prediction swings and roundabouts. He is looking for what | :07:34. | :07:36. | |
he calls the incumbency effect. Don't know what is a back-up -- what | :07:37. | :07:43. | |
that's about question don't worry, here is an. Being in office is bad | :07:44. | :07:52. | |
for your health. Political folk wisdom has it that incumbency | :07:53. | :07:57. | |
favours one party in particular the Liberal Democrats. That is because | :07:58. | :08:01. | |
their MPs have a reputation as ferociously good local campaigners | :08:02. | :08:04. | |
who do really well at holding on to their seats. However, this time | :08:05. | :08:09. | |
round, several big-name long serving Liberal Democrats like Ming | :08:10. | :08:14. | |
Campbell, David Heath and Don Foster are standing down. Does that mean | :08:15. | :08:18. | |
the incumbency effect disappears like a puff of smoke? Then there is | :08:19. | :08:24. | |
another theory, called the sophomore surge. It might sound like a movie | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
about US college kids, but it goes like this. New MPs tend to do better | :08:29. | :08:32. | |
in their second election than they did in their first. That could | :08:33. | :08:36. | |
favour the Tories because they have lots of first-time MPs. The big | :08:37. | :08:42. | |
question is, what does this mean for the 7th of May 2015, the date of the | :08:43. | :08:45. | |
next general election? The answer is, who knows? I know a man who | :08:46. | :08:56. | |
knows. Peter. What does it all mean? You can go onto your PC now and draw | :08:57. | :09:01. | |
down programmes which say that these are the voting figures from a | :09:02. | :09:04. | |
national poll, so what will the seats look like? This is based on | :09:05. | :09:08. | |
uniform swing. Every seat moving up and down across the country in the | :09:09. | :09:12. | |
same way. Historically, that's been a pretty good guide. I think that's | :09:13. | :09:18. | |
going to completely break down next year, because the Lib Dems will | :09:19. | :09:22. | |
probably hold on to more seats than we predict from the national figures | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
and I think fewer Tory seats will go to the Labour Party than you would | :09:28. | :09:31. | |
predict from the national figures. The precise numbers, I'm not going | :09:32. | :09:36. | |
to be too precise, but I would be surprised, sorry, I would not be | :09:37. | :09:42. | |
surprised if Labour fell 20 or 5 seats short on what we would expect | :09:43. | :09:47. | |
on the uniform swing prediction Next year's election will be tight. | :09:48. | :09:52. | |
Falling 20 seats short could well mean the difference between victory | :09:53. | :09:57. | |
and defeat. What you make of that, Helen? I think you're right, | :09:58. | :10:01. | |
especially taking into account the UKIP effect. We have no idea about | :10:02. | :10:05. | |
that. The conventional wisdom is that will drain away back to the | :10:06. | :10:09. | |
Conservatives, but nobody knows and it makes the next election almost | :10:10. | :10:14. | |
impossible to call. It means it is a great target the people like Lord | :10:15. | :10:17. | |
Ashcroft with marginal polling, because people have never been so | :10:18. | :10:23. | |
interested. It is for party politics and we all assume that UKIP should | :10:24. | :10:26. | |
be well next year, but their vote went up from 17 up to 27%. Then that | :10:27. | :10:34. | |
17% went down to 3%, so they might only be five or 6% in the general | :10:35. | :10:38. | |
election, so they might not have the threat of depriving Conservatives of | :10:39. | :10:42. | |
their seats. Where the incumbency thing has an effect is the Liberal | :10:43. | :10:46. | |
Democrats. They have fortress seats where between 1992 and 1997 Liberal | :10:47. | :10:51. | |
Democrats seats fell, but their percentage went up. They are losing | :10:52. | :10:56. | |
the local government base though. True, but having people like Ming | :10:57. | :10:59. | |
Campbell standing down means they will struggle. We are used to | :11:00. | :11:03. | |
incumbency being an important factor in American politics. It's hard to | :11:04. | :11:07. | |
get rid of an incumbent unless it is a primary election, like we saw in | :11:08. | :11:12. | |
Virginia, but is it now becoming an important factor in British | :11:13. | :11:16. | |
politics, that if you own the seat you're more likely to hold on to it | :11:17. | :11:21. | |
than not? If it is, that's a remarkable thing. It's hard to be a | :11:22. | :11:25. | |
carpetbagger in America, but it is normal in British Parliamentary | :11:26. | :11:27. | |
constituencies to be represented by someone who did not grow up locally. | :11:28. | :11:31. | |
It is a special kind of achievement to have an incumbency effect where | :11:32. | :11:35. | |
you don't have deep roots in the constituency. I was going to ask | :11:36. | :11:39. | |
about the Lib Dems. If we are wrong, and they collapse in Parliamentary | :11:40. | :11:42. | |
representation as much as the share in vote collapses, is that not good | :11:43. | :11:47. | |
news is that the Conservatives? They would be in second place in the | :11:48. | :11:51. | |
majority of existing Lib Dems seats. For every seat where Labour are | :11:52. | :11:55. | |
second to the Lib Dems, there are two where the Conservatives are | :11:56. | :11:58. | |
second. If the Lib Dem representation collapses, that helps | :11:59. | :12:06. | |
the Conservatives. I'm assuming the Tories will gain about ten seats. If | :12:07. | :12:11. | |
they gain 20, if they'd had 20 more seats last time, they would have had | :12:12. | :12:14. | |
a majority government, just about. So 20 seats off the Lib Dem, do the | :12:15. | :12:20. | |
maths, as they say in America, and they could lose a handful to labour | :12:21. | :12:24. | |
and still be able to run a one party, minority government. The fate | :12:25. | :12:27. | |
of the Lib Dems could be crucial to the outcome to the politics of | :12:28. | :12:35. | |
light. On the 8th of May, it will be VE Day and victory in election day | :12:36. | :12:39. | |
as well as Europe. The Lib Dems will be apoplectic if they lose all of | :12:40. | :12:42. | |
the seats to their coalition partners. The great quote by Angela | :12:43. | :12:48. | |
Merkel, the little party always gets crushed. It's a well-established | :12:49. | :12:52. | |
idea that coalition politics. They can't take credit for the things | :12:53. | :12:55. | |
people like you may get lumbered with the ones they don't. They have | :12:56. | :12:59. | |
contributed most of this terrible idea that seized politics where you | :13:00. | :13:03. | |
say it, but you don't deliver it. Tuition fees is the classic example | :13:04. | :13:08. | |
of this Parliament. Why should you believe any promise you make? And Ed | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
Miliband is feeling that as well. But in 1974 the liberal Democrats | :13:14. | :13:17. | |
barely had any MPs but there were reporters outside Jeremy Thorpe s | :13:18. | :13:20. | |
home because they potentially held not the balance of power, but were | :13:21. | :13:25. | |
significantly in fourth. Bringing back memories Jeremy Thorpe, and we | :13:26. | :13:28. | |
will leave it there. Thanks to the panel. We are tomorrow on BBC Two. | :13:29. | :13:33. | |
At the earlier time of 11am because of Wimbledon. Yes, it's that time of | :13:34. | :13:37. | |
year again already. I will be back here at 11 o'clock next week. | :13:38. | :13:42. | |
Remember, if it is Sunday, it is the Sunday Politics. | :13:43. | :13:46. |