Browse content similar to 11/05/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, folks. Welcome to the Sunday Politics, where we're talking | :00:34. | :00:37. | |
about the Europe-wide contest that really matters. No, not Eurovision. | :00:38. | :00:46. | |
The European elections. There are local elections across England too | :00:47. | :00:49. | |
on May 22nd. The party leaders are campaigning ahead of polling day. | :00:50. | :00:53. | |
The results could be a pointer to the Big One, May 2015. We'll be | :00:54. | :00:59. | |
speaking to the man in charge of Labour's election battle plan. Has | :01:00. | :01:03. | |
the opposition really got its sights set on all-out victory in 2015? Or | :01:04. | :01:06. | |
will it just be content with squeaking home? And you can't | :01:07. | :01:13. | |
mention elections these days without talking about the impact of this | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
And in the Midlands, one giant him if UKIP really | :01:18. | :01:22. | |
And in the Midlands, one giant Euro`constituency of nearly six | :01:23. | :01:25. | |
million people electing seven MEPs. We'll have the first of our two live | :01:26. | :01:27. | |
debates with the parties of in, out, debates with the parties of in, out, | :01:28. | :01:29. | |
boroughs. What will make a difference to the way you vote? | :01:30. | :01:37. | |
And I'm joined by three journalists guaranteed to bring a touch of | :01:38. | :01:42. | |
Eurovision glamour to your Sunday morning. With views more | :01:43. | :01:45. | |
controversial than a bearded Austrian drag act and twice the | :01:46. | :01:48. | |
dress sense, it's Nick Watt, Helen Lewis and Janan Ganesh. So you might | :01:49. | :01:58. | |
have thought you've already heard David Cameron promise an in-out | :01:59. | :02:00. | |
referendum on EU membership in 2017 if he's still Prime Minister. Many | :02:01. | :02:07. | |
times. Many, many times. Well he obviously doesn't think you've been | :02:08. | :02:09. | |
listening, because he's been saying it again today. Here he is speaking | :02:10. | :02:14. | |
to the BBC earlier. We will hold a referendum by the end of 2017. It | :02:15. | :02:18. | |
will be a referendum on an in-out basis. Do we stay in a reformed | :02:19. | :02:22. | |
European Union or do we leave? And I've said very clearly that whatever | :02:23. | :02:25. | |
the outcome of the next election, and of course I want an overall | :02:26. | :02:28. | |
majority and I'm hoping and believing I can win an overall | :02:29. | :02:31. | |
majority, that people should be in no doubt I will not become Prime | :02:32. | :02:34. | |
Minister unless I can guarantee that we will hold a referendum. Here's | :02:35. | :02:45. | |
saying there that an overall majority there will definitely be a | :02:46. | :02:49. | |
referendum. If these are the minority position, he won't form a | :02:50. | :02:52. | |
new coalition unless they agree to a referendum, too. The Lib Dems a | :02:53. | :02:58. | |
pulmonary agree to that. They probably will because the Prime | :02:59. | :03:00. | |
ministers have a strong argument which is I gave you a referendum | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
back in 2010 so the least I need is theirs and the Lib Dems are the only | :03:05. | :03:08. | |
party who have stood in recent elections on a clear mandate to hold | :03:09. | :03:12. | |
a referendum, so it is difficult for them to say no, there was | :03:13. | :03:15. | |
interesting the interview he did earlier today. He named everything | :03:16. | :03:20. | |
was going to ask for. The most controversial with him, as he said | :03:21. | :03:25. | |
in his speech last year, he wants to take Britain out of the commitment | :03:26. | :03:30. | |
to make the European Union and ever closer union. That is a very big | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
ask, but the point is, he may well get it because the choice for the | :03:36. | :03:38. | |
European Union now, France and Germany, is a clear wonderful do | :03:39. | :03:44. | |
Britain in or out? Previously, it was can you put up with a British | :03:45. | :03:47. | |
prime ministers being annoying? I think you'll find the answer is they | :03:48. | :03:51. | |
are willing to pay a price but not any price to keep Britain in. In | :03:52. | :03:56. | |
this scenario, Labour would have lost the election again because we | :03:57. | :04:02. | |
are talking the slowly happen if Mr Cameron is the largest party or has | :04:03. | :04:05. | |
an overall majority. Could you then see Labour deciding we had better go | :04:06. | :04:10. | |
along with a referendum, too? I think that's unlikely because as I | :04:11. | :04:12. | |
think that's unlikely because there's a huge upside for that for I | :04:13. | :04:15. | |
think what's interesting is the idea he would for minority government. | :04:16. | :04:19. | |
Would you get confidence and look at other options that might well happen | :04:20. | :04:23. | |
with the way the arithmetic is going or is he going to hold out and say | :04:24. | :04:26. | |
the only way I will be Prime Minister is in a majority | :04:27. | :04:30. | |
Conservative government? No, the implication of his remarks was I | :04:31. | :04:36. | |
wouldn't form a coalition government unless my coalition partners would | :04:37. | :04:40. | |
also agree to vote for a referendum. He's basically talking about is | :04:41. | :04:42. | |
negotiating strategy in those coalition talks. It's a red line and | :04:43. | :04:48. | |
a huge opportunity for the Lib Dems, because they know David Cameron | :04:49. | :04:51. | |
absolutely has to do, for accidental reasons, as a person who survives as | :04:52. | :04:57. | |
Tory leader, to ask for that referendum, so they can ask anything | :04:58. | :05:01. | |
they want in return and if I was Nick Clegg, I would work out in the | :05:02. | :05:04. | |
next year one absolute colossal negotiating demand for those | :05:05. | :05:11. | |
coalition talks. For a party around 10% in the polls, they will do have | :05:12. | :05:15. | |
the Prime Minister over a barrel on this one, assuming that coalition | :05:16. | :05:24. | |
talks goes well. They could make Michael Gove Tbyte meeting. OK, we | :05:25. | :05:29. | |
need to move on. So, the politicians are out and about on what used to be | :05:30. | :05:33. | |
called the stump ahead of local and European elections in less than two | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
weeks' time. But, without wanting to depress you on a damp Sunday | :05:37. | :05:39. | |
morning, the party strategists are already hard at work on their | :05:40. | :05:42. | |
campaign plans for the General Election next May. Yes, it's less | :05:43. | :05:45. | |
than a year to go. They may have taken their time, but Labour's | :05:46. | :05:48. | |
battleplan for 2015 is starting to take shape. As well as take | :05:49. | :05:50. | |
promising to freeze your energy bills, and reintroduce the 50p rate | :05:51. | :05:54. | |
of tax, Ed Miliband now says he wants to intervene in the housing | :05:55. | :05:59. | |
market to keep rents down. There's even talk that the party leadership | :06:00. | :06:02. | |
wants to bring more railway lines into public ownership. And Labour is | :06:03. | :06:08. | |
gambling that its big push on the cost of living will see it through | :06:09. | :06:11. | |
to the general election despite evidence that growth is firmly back. | :06:12. | :06:14. | |
Labour's campaign chief Douglas Alexander hopes it all adds up to | :06:15. | :06:20. | |
victory next May. But so far, the evidence is hitting home very thin. | :06:21. | :06:26. | |
One survey today shows that 56% of people don't think Mr Miliband is up | :06:27. | :06:30. | |
to the job of Prime Minister. As we head towards one of the least | :06:31. | :06:33. | |
predictable general elections in 70 years, has Labour got a message to | :06:34. | :06:39. | |
win seats up and down the country? And Labour's election co-ordinator | :06:40. | :06:41. | |
and Shadow Foreign Secretary, Douglas Alexander, joins me now. | :06:42. | :06:49. | |
Welcome to Sunday Politics. A lot of these policies announced polar | :06:50. | :06:52. | |
pretty well. By popular with the country. When you add them together, | :06:53. | :06:57. | |
it's a move to the left and what would be wrong with that? I think is | :06:58. | :07:02. | |
your packet suggests, the contours in the coming campaign are becoming | :07:03. | :07:08. | |
clear. Our judgement is the defining issue of the year in British | :07:09. | :07:11. | |
politics will be the widening gap between the wealth of the country | :07:12. | :07:14. | |
and the finances of ordinary families. We believe it will be a | :07:15. | :07:17. | |
cost of living election and we have been setting out our thinking in | :07:18. | :07:21. | |
relation to energy prices and rent, but you will hear more from Labour | :07:22. | :07:24. | |
Party in the coming months because we're now less than one year away | :07:25. | :07:29. | |
from a decisive moment. If the leftish think tank suggested any of | :07:30. | :07:32. | |
his policies in that Tony Blair years, you would have opposed them. | :07:33. | :07:38. | |
Let's be clear, when not going for an interest but seeking to secure a | :07:39. | :07:43. | |
majority for the only way to do that is not simply to appeal to your | :07:44. | :07:47. | |
base, but to the centre ground. I believe we got genuine opportunities | :07:48. | :07:52. | |
in the next year. You have the Conservatives in a struggle with | :07:53. | :07:56. | |
UKIP on the right of politics. The Lib Dems 9% of trying to find their | :07:57. | :08:00. | |
base, and there's a genuine opportunity in the next year for | :08:01. | :08:03. | |
Labour to dominate the centre ground of politics and secure the majority | :08:04. | :08:07. | |
Labour government we are planning for in the coming year. I notice you | :08:08. | :08:11. | |
didn't deny you wouldn't have opposed. You say you have got an | :08:12. | :08:22. | |
message for aspirational voters in the South. This is what John Denham | :08:23. | :08:27. | |
said. He thinks you're talking too much to your core vote. | :08:28. | :08:37. | |
He is right to recognise we took a terrible beating in 2010. 29%. If | :08:38. | :08:45. | |
you look at what we've done in the last week, for example, the | :08:46. | :08:51. | |
signature policy on rent Ed Miliband announced to launch the campaign, | :08:52. | :08:53. | |
there's now more than 9 million people in the country in the private | :08:54. | :08:58. | |
rented sector, more than 1 million families. Many of them are in the | :08:59. | :09:02. | |
south-east. They are seeing circumstances where, suddenly, | :09:03. | :09:04. | |
landlord will increase the rent and they put the pressure involved in | :09:05. | :09:09. | |
schooling, health care facing the families, so it is important both in | :09:10. | :09:14. | |
terms of policy and in terms of politics that we speak to the whole | :09:15. | :09:17. | |
country, not simply to one part of it falls up what is the average rise | :09:18. | :09:21. | |
in event last year? I don't know. Can you tell me? 1%. 1% not in real | :09:22. | :09:30. | |
terms. I'm not sure what the problem is. It will happen to wages in last | :09:31. | :09:36. | |
year, we are facing circumstances where people will be worse off, up | :09:37. | :09:42. | |
to ?1600 off worse and frankly, if our opponents want to argue that the | :09:43. | :09:47. | |
economy has healed and they deserve a victory lap, good luck to them | :09:48. | :09:51. | |
because actually, what we are hearing from the Buddhist public, | :09:52. | :09:56. | |
not just in the north and south, is not the cost living crisis is | :09:57. | :10:00. | |
continuing and it affects families. There was nothing aspirational about | :10:01. | :10:02. | |
your party election broadcast for the European elections. It looked | :10:03. | :10:08. | |
like crude class war to money people. That's a bit of it. Bedroom | :10:09. | :10:13. | |
tax. Isn't it going to look bad that two thirds of those affected are | :10:14. | :10:16. | |
disabled? Who cares? They can't fight back. Shall be lay-offs and | :10:17. | :10:23. | |
NHS nurses? The National Health Service? Oh yes. Mr Cameron? Who | :10:24. | :10:37. | |
said that? Me. My gosh. The man has shrunk. He's actually shrunk. What | :10:38. | :10:40. | |
shall we do with him? Can we hunt him? Nothing about Europe, Labour | :10:41. | :10:48. | |
policy. News that the Tories would result in negative campaigning and | :10:49. | :10:53. | |
smear. You didn't tell you would be just as bad. Let's start the party | :10:54. | :10:57. | |
broadcast. The one thing guaranteed to have most people reaching for the | :10:58. | :11:03. | |
remote control these days are the words, there now follows a party but | :11:04. | :11:08. | |
the broadcast. I make no apology in the factory to be innovative in how | :11:09. | :11:12. | |
we presented. It's factual. It was a policy -based critic of this | :11:13. | :11:16. | |
government. And the Lib Dems role within it. So you're claiming it's | :11:17. | :11:21. | |
factual to betray the camera and cabinet is not even knowing what the | :11:22. | :11:29. | |
NHS is, -- the Cameron Cabinet. They attack the disabled because they | :11:30. | :11:33. | |
can't fight back. The Pinellas Tanner severely Prime Minister Sun | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
and he was treated during a short life by the NHS. It's a fact many | :11:39. | :11:44. | |
disabled people across the country including in my constituency have | :11:45. | :11:48. | |
been directly affected by the bedroom tax. And ultimately, this | :11:49. | :11:51. | |
Conservative led government, including the Lib Dems, will be held | :11:52. | :11:56. | |
accountable by the politicians. You say that, the Prime Minister, who | :11:57. | :12:00. | |
had a severely disabled son of. I you not ashamed about? I shadowed | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
Iain Duncan Smith of five months also they don't have the excuses of | :12:06. | :12:11. | |
seeing that saying nobody told them the consequences of the bedroom tax. | :12:12. | :12:14. | |
They went into this with their eyes open. They knew about the hardship | :12:15. | :12:19. | |
and difficulty. If they were one-bedroom properties available | :12:20. | :12:21. | |
across the country for people to move into, their argument would be | :12:22. | :12:26. | |
OK but they knew they were dealing with the most vulnerable people. Did | :12:27. | :12:31. | |
you sign off that part of the broadcast? Of course I stand by the | :12:32. | :12:37. | |
fact of it. I wish David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith would apologise to | :12:38. | :12:41. | |
the disabled people of the country and the poorest people for the | :12:42. | :12:44. | |
effects of the bedroom tax. I hope we get that apology between now and | :12:45. | :12:51. | |
election. As someone who thinks integrity is important in politics, | :12:52. | :12:56. | |
not ashamed of this kind of thing? It's important we scrutinise the | :12:57. | :12:59. | |
policies of this government as well as adding a positive agenda for | :13:00. | :13:06. | |
change. You want that you won't promise this is the last time we'll | :13:07. | :13:11. | |
see such a negative press campaign? I don't think it is negative or | :13:12. | :13:13. | |
personal to scrutinise the government. So we'll get more of | :13:14. | :13:18. | |
this? I'm less interested in the background of the cabinet than their | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
views. You call the upper-class twits. It's for the British public | :13:25. | :13:28. | |
to make a judgement in terms of the British... That's how you depicted | :13:29. | :13:32. | |
them. We are held in accountable for the bedroom tax, the NHS, taxation, | :13:33. | :13:39. | |
and our record they have to defend. One reason are so fearful in this | :13:40. | :13:42. | |
election is actually because they know they have a poor record. Let's | :13:43. | :13:47. | |
look at other part of the election campaign. This poster. Particularly | :13:48. | :13:54. | |
digitally doing the rounds. On that shopping basket, can you tell us | :13:55. | :14:01. | |
which items take the full 20% VAT? It's representative of household | :14:02. | :14:04. | |
shopping, which includes items like cleaning products, and we know that | :14:05. | :14:08. | |
food is not that trouble. People don't go to the supermarket and say | :14:09. | :14:24. | |
this is -- vatable. So you are denying that ?450 extra is being | :14:25. | :14:28. | |
paid? Yes, where'd you get that figure? For an average family to pay | :14:29. | :14:36. | |
?450 a year extra VAT, they would have to spend ?21,600 a year on | :14:37. | :14:44. | |
vatable products at 20%. The average take-home pay is only 21,009. They | :14:45. | :14:48. | |
have got to spend on all sorts of things which are zero VAT. So in | :14:49. | :14:53. | |
addition to the items, has a range of products people face in terms of | :14:54. | :15:00. | |
VAT. How could an average family of ?21,000 a year spent 21,006 and the | :15:01. | :15:07. | |
pound a year on 20% vatable items? It's not an annual figure, is it? So | :15:08. | :15:15. | |
what is it then? If it's an annual, what is it? The increased VAT in | :15:16. | :15:20. | |
this parliament is calculated over the course of a Parliament. For the | :15:21. | :15:26. | |
whole of the Parliament? And you're illustrated this with a shopping | :15:27. | :15:32. | |
basket which almost has no VAT on it at all? People will be buying a | :15:33. | :15:37. | |
weekly shop in the course of this Parliament every week. Did you sign | :15:38. | :15:42. | |
off on this as well? Of course. It didn't dawn on you you're putting | :15:43. | :15:46. | |
things on it which have no VAT? If you want to argue some people go to | :15:47. | :15:51. | |
the shops and say these are vatable or not, I disagree. Even your rent | :15:52. | :16:00. | |
cap announcement went wrong. You're working on the rent rises and it | :16:01. | :16:03. | |
turns out it wasn't. It was a post your policy. It is the exception | :16:04. | :16:13. | |
rather than the rule to have the position we have at the moment. In | :16:14. | :16:17. | |
Northern Ireland we have seen the continued rise in terms of the | :16:18. | :16:21. | |
rented sector but there is a widespread recognition that for | :16:22. | :16:27. | |
those people in the rented sector, change is necessary. Are you | :16:28. | :16:33. | |
coordinating this campaign? It seems accident prone. This is a party that | :16:34. | :16:44. | |
has set the agenda more effectively than a Conservative party that said | :16:45. | :16:47. | |
when David Cameron was elected he wasn't going to bang on about | :16:48. | :16:56. | |
Europe. The day after the election we expect the Conservative party to | :16:57. | :17:02. | |
be engulfed in crisis. I'm proud of what we talk about and I think there | :17:03. | :17:06. | |
is a clear contrast about a party talking about issues people care | :17:07. | :17:11. | |
about, and a Conservative party talking about exclusively a | :17:12. | :17:15. | |
referendum. Are you in charge of the campaign? I am coordinating the | :17:16. | :17:23. | |
campaign is, yes. The expensive election guru you have hired, has he | :17:24. | :17:29. | |
been involved in any of this? We have started our discussions with | :17:30. | :17:34. | |
him. You are going to have to brief him about British politics because | :17:35. | :17:38. | |
he doesn't know anything about it. I make no apology for hiring him. He | :17:39. | :17:45. | |
has a lot of experience in winning tight elections and that is what we | :17:46. | :17:50. | |
are expecting. If you are expecting us to say, they have passed and we | :17:51. | :17:56. | |
have to hold them accountable, then I am sorry but we have a campaign | :17:57. | :18:03. | |
that holds the Government and the Conservatives to account for what I | :18:04. | :18:12. | |
think is a very hopeless record in government. Thank you. | :18:13. | :18:17. | |
He leads a party with zero MPs but his media presence is huge. He's had | :18:18. | :18:20. | |
an expenses scandal, but the public didn't seem to mind. He's got a | :18:21. | :18:23. | |
privileged background but he's seen as an anti-establishment champion. | :18:24. | :18:26. | |
Nothing seems to stick to him, not even eggs. I speak of course of | :18:27. | :18:30. | |
Nigel Farage. We'll talk to him in a moment, but first Giles has been out | :18:31. | :18:33. | |
on the campaign trail ahead of elections that could make or break | :18:34. | :18:35. | |
the UKIP leader. Nigel Farage likes a stage, and at | :18:36. | :18:39. | |
this stage of the Euro and local election campaign he is, like his | :18:40. | :18:43. | |
party, in buoyant mood. They feel they are on the verge of what they | :18:44. | :18:47. | |
see as causing an earthquake in British politics. Today Nigel is | :18:48. | :18:52. | |
filling thousands seat venues and bigger. Not that there's much sign | :18:53. | :19:02. | |
of that at this press launch. But it's a threat with serious money | :19:03. | :19:05. | |
behind it, that they believe the media and the political elite just | :19:06. | :19:07. | |
haven't realised yet, much less learned how to counter it. Not that | :19:08. | :19:10. | |
it's all been plain sailing. Offensive comments from some | :19:11. | :19:13. | |
candidates has not only seen UKIP labelled as racist, but necessitated | :19:14. | :19:16. | |
a rally by the party to visibly and verbally challenge that. The | :19:17. | :19:24. | |
offensive idiotic statements made by this handful of people have been | :19:25. | :19:26. | |
lifted up and presented to the great British public as if they represent | :19:27. | :19:31. | |
the view of this party, which they do not. They never have and they | :19:32. | :19:34. | |
never will. APPLAUSE I don't care what you call us, but | :19:35. | :19:50. | |
from this moment on, please do not call must trust a racist party. We | :19:51. | :20:01. | |
are not a racist party. The need to say that is not just | :20:02. | :20:04. | |
about the European and local elections even at that campaign | :20:05. | :20:07. | |
launch it's clear UKIP's leader has set his sights firmly on the | :20:08. | :20:09. | |
ultimate prize. I come from the south of England and I would not | :20:10. | :20:12. | |
want to be seen as an opportunist heading to the north, north Norfolk | :20:13. | :20:17. | |
or whatever it will be. I will make my mind up and stand in the general | :20:18. | :20:23. | |
election for somewhere in Kent, East Sussex, Hampshire, somewhere in my | :20:24. | :20:28. | |
home patch. Back at UKIP HQ they are still drilling down how the last | :20:29. | :20:37. | |
fortnight of campaigning should go. They aren't taking any chances, and | :20:38. | :20:40. | |
one imagines having offices above those of Max Clifford is a reminder | :20:41. | :20:43. | |
how fragile built reputations can be of the bubble bursting. They want | :20:44. | :20:46. | |
their reputation to be built on votes and they know anything but | :20:47. | :20:49. | |
significant success on May 22nd and some seats in Westminster in 2015 | :20:50. | :20:57. | |
isn't going to be good enough. And after that, having sold yourselves | :20:58. | :21:00. | |
as the honest outsiders, that stance is harder to maintain once your | :21:01. | :21:03. | |
people are on the inside. And subtle changes from the past are already | :21:04. | :21:10. | |
noticeable. The ordinary man of the people stance is still working. | :21:11. | :21:12. | |
Characteristically outside a pub, Nigel Farage is glad handed by a | :21:13. | :21:19. | |
customer. Two weeks to go, let's cause an upset. Wouldn't that be | :21:20. | :21:24. | |
great? The only sign that such an interaction is different now is the | :21:25. | :21:27. | |
ever presence of bodyguards who shadow his every move. Over lunch | :21:28. | :21:39. | |
ahead of Question Time, a radio appearance, and then off to | :21:40. | :21:42. | |
Scotland, I ask him if some of those minded to vote UKIP who see him as a | :21:43. | :21:46. | |
man they'd be comfortable having a drink with are the sort of people | :21:47. | :21:49. | |
he'd be entirely comfortable sitting down with. Every political party | :21:50. | :21:51. | |
attracts support from across the spectrum and there will be some | :21:52. | :21:54. | |
magnificent people who vote for us and some ne'er-do-wells. The one | :21:55. | :22:02. | |
common thing about UKIP voters is that they are often not very | :22:03. | :22:08. | |
political. And it's that people's army that if UKIP can get to a | :22:09. | :22:11. | |
polling booth might just create that earthquake they want. | :22:12. | :22:17. | |
Nigel Farage joins me now. When you decided not to stand at the new work | :22:18. | :22:21. | |
by election coming said if you lost it that the bubble would have | :22:22. | :22:28. | |
burst. What did you mean by that? I was asked at seven 20p -- at 7:21pm | :22:29. | :22:47. | |
if I would stand, I have decided by the next morning that I would not. I | :22:48. | :22:53. | |
didn't know he was going to resign. You claim only a handful of UKIP | :22:54. | :22:57. | |
candidates have ever said things that are either stupid or offensive, | :22:58. | :23:04. | |
I'm right on that, yes? 0.1%, I'd rather it was non-. But why have you | :23:05. | :23:10. | |
chosen a candidate to fight this by-election that has said many | :23:11. | :23:14. | |
things most people would regard as stupid or offensive? Roger is | :23:15. | :23:20. | |
fighting this for us, someone of 70 years of age who grew up with a | :23:21. | :23:26. | |
strong Christian Bible background, in an age when homosexuality was | :23:27. | :23:31. | |
imprisonable. He had a certain set of views which he maintained for | :23:32. | :23:34. | |
many years which he now says he accepts the world has moved on and | :23:35. | :23:41. | |
he is relaxed about it. The comments about homosexuality are not from the | :23:42. | :23:46. | |
dark ages, they are from two or three years ago. From when he was a | :23:47. | :23:52. | |
Conservative, yes, so will you be asking David Cameron that question? | :23:53. | :23:56. | |
I have never seen a single comment from Roger that would be deemed to | :23:57. | :24:04. | |
be offensive. Do you regard his comments on homosexuality as | :24:05. | :24:09. | |
offensive? When he grew up, homosexuality was illegal in this | :24:10. | :24:14. | |
country. But this was in 2012 but he said that. Most people have his age | :24:15. | :24:25. | |
still feel uncomfortable about it -- of his age. In 2012 he said, if two | :24:26. | :24:32. | |
men can be married, why not three, why not a commune. Many people in | :24:33. | :24:38. | |
this country are disconcerted by the change in the meaning of marriage | :24:39. | :24:42. | |
and in a tolerant society we understand that some people have | :24:43. | :24:47. | |
different views. But he has changed his views now in only two years? He | :24:48. | :24:52. | |
says he is more relaxed about it. Was he your candidate? He is a | :24:53. | :25:03. | |
first-class campaigner who has had 30 years in industry, he served in | :25:04. | :25:07. | |
the European Parliament, he is a good candidate. This morning's | :25:08. | :25:12. | |
papers suggest you are about to select Victoria Ayling for Grimsby, | :25:13. | :25:17. | |
but she is on camera saying that, of immigrants, I just want to send a | :25:18. | :25:22. | |
lot back. This is all very interesting, and we can talk about | :25:23. | :25:26. | |
it, all we could talk about the fact that in 12 days we have a European | :25:27. | :25:30. | |
election and every voter across the UK can vote on it and it is really | :25:31. | :25:37. | |
interesting. Are you happy to pick a candidate that says of immigrants, I | :25:38. | :25:45. | |
just want to send a lot back? I have seen the tape, it is a complete | :25:46. | :25:50. | |
misquote and she says it in the context of illegal immigrants. I | :25:51. | :25:58. | |
have seen the full quote and in the context it is not about illegal | :25:59. | :26:01. | |
immigrants. Let's come onto the European campaign, you have used a | :26:02. | :26:06. | |
company that employs Eastern European is to deliver leaflets in | :26:07. | :26:11. | |
London and the Home Counties. Have we? I'm told that in Croydon one | :26:12. | :26:17. | |
branch might have done that. Have you found some indigenous Brits to | :26:18. | :26:23. | |
deliver leaflets in Europe? We have thousands joining the party every | :26:24. | :26:27. | |
month and they are not all indigenous because what is | :26:28. | :26:30. | |
interesting is that in today's opinion polls, UKIP is above the Lib | :26:31. | :26:46. | |
Dems and the Conservatives amongst the indigenous voting. | :26:47. | :26:56. | |
We have not agreed a manifesto for the general election, we will do | :26:57. | :27:03. | |
over the course of the summer. This is in your local election. We are | :27:04. | :27:09. | |
having local elections in some part of the country but we are fighting a | :27:10. | :27:13. | |
European election. It is impossible with the British media to have an | :27:14. | :27:18. | |
intelligent debate on the European question. But as I say, we are also | :27:19. | :27:24. | |
fighting the local elections too. You have promised these tax cuts, | :27:25. | :27:31. | |
how much will they cost? I have met -- read the local election manifesto | :27:32. | :27:35. | |
and it doesn't make those promises. We do talk about local services, we | :27:36. | :27:40. | |
do talk about the need to keep council tax down but we don't talk | :27:41. | :27:48. | |
about income tax. Absolutely not. In local election campaigning you say | :27:49. | :27:52. | |
you would restore cuts to policing, double prison places, restore cuts | :27:53. | :27:58. | |
to front line NHS, spend more on roads, how much would that cost? You | :27:59. | :28:05. | |
are obviously reading different documents to me. We are voting for | :28:06. | :28:10. | |
local councillors in district councils who have got little local | :28:11. | :28:17. | |
budgets. Every party in a manifesto puts his aspirations in it. Have you | :28:18. | :28:23. | |
read it? Of course I have, cover to cover, which is why I'm saying you | :28:24. | :28:29. | |
are misquoting it. By the way, on the bubble bursting, you told that | :28:30. | :28:36. | |
to Norman Smith of the BBC. 75% of British laws are now made in the | :28:37. | :28:40. | |
European Union. Now AstraZeneca is potentially going to be taken over | :28:41. | :28:46. | |
by Pfizer. The BBC is refusing to show the public that that decision | :28:47. | :28:51. | |
cannot be taken here but by an elected European commissioner, and | :28:52. | :28:55. | |
we sit and argue about what is in or not in the local election manifesto. | :28:56. | :29:09. | |
It is my job, but let me come on to AstraZeneca. Is it your view that a | :29:10. | :29:12. | |
British government should stop the takeover of AstraZeneca? It cannot. | :29:13. | :29:24. | |
Can we please get this clear. I sat next to Chuka Umunna the other day | :29:25. | :29:28. | |
at question time and he said what could and couldn't be done. He said | :29:29. | :29:34. | |
I am being studiously neutral, and the reason is we don't have this | :29:35. | :29:38. | |
power. That is what the European elections is about. Should France | :29:39. | :29:44. | |
have the takeover of the food company Danan? We seem to do things | :29:45. | :30:02. | |
to the Nth degree and nobody else does, perhaps because we have this | :30:03. | :30:06. | |
culture and we obey it. In your view, you don't think Pfizer should | :30:07. | :30:15. | |
be able to take over AstraZeneca? There is some good science within | :30:16. | :30:19. | |
AstraZeneca which is in danger of being asset stripped and lost. | :30:20. | :30:26. | |
Because it is run by a Swede and a Frenchman and most of its employees | :30:27. | :30:31. | |
are overseas. I understand that but there are still some good science | :30:32. | :30:36. | |
being produced here. What did you think of the Prime Minister saying | :30:37. | :30:39. | |
he would not form a government after the election unless he was able to | :30:40. | :30:45. | |
have a referendum in 2017? I sat here talking to you and you said to | :30:46. | :30:52. | |
me that David Cameron had given a cast-iron guarantee that if David | :30:53. | :30:56. | |
Cameron becomes Prime Minister he will have a referendum on the Lisbon | :30:57. | :31:00. | |
Treaty, but he didn't deliver on that. He knows that people struggle | :31:01. | :31:05. | |
to believe the renegotiation is worth a row of beans. He is saying | :31:06. | :31:11. | |
he will not form a government unless he can go forward with the | :31:12. | :31:15. | |
referendum. I know he is desperately trying to pretend to be Eurosceptic | :31:16. | :31:18. | |
whilst at the same time saying he will campaign for Britain to remain | :31:19. | :31:23. | |
in. In a sense, that is what this election is about. We have three | :31:24. | :31:27. | |
traditional parties, all of whom passionately believe in the | :31:28. | :31:30. | |
continued membership of the European Union and we have UKIP saying we | :31:31. | :31:34. | |
want trade and cooperation but there is a bigger and better world out | :31:35. | :31:40. | |
there. You are now travelling with I think four bodyguards, has this | :31:41. | :31:51. | |
affected you and your family life? I can't stand it. I've always wondered | :31:52. | :31:55. | |
about the place and on my own thing. Sadly we have a couple of | :31:56. | :31:59. | |
organisations out there headed up by senior Labour Party figures who | :32:00. | :32:01. | |
purport to be against fascism and extremism, who received funding from | :32:02. | :32:07. | |
the Department of communities, from the trade unions, who have acted in | :32:08. | :32:11. | |
a violent wait more than once. You are saying the Labour Party is | :32:12. | :32:16. | |
behind the threats? No, I said a taxpayer funded, trade union funded | :32:17. | :32:20. | |
and headed by senior Labour Party figures, and I'm happy for them to | :32:21. | :32:23. | |
come to my meetings and have an itinerant with me, but it's not so | :32:24. | :32:27. | |
much fun when there are banging you over the head. I is still keen to be | :32:28. | :32:33. | |
an MP? Yes, what UKIP will then do is target before the general | :32:34. | :32:38. | |
election next year for the one life be easier if you just went to the | :32:39. | :32:43. | |
Lords? That's the last thing I want to do. There's an awful lot to do. | :32:44. | :32:47. | |
Most of all, I will not rest until we are free from political union and | :32:48. | :32:51. | |
government from Brussels. Nigel Farage, thank you for being with us. | :32:52. | :32:54. | |
It's just gone 11.30am. You're watching the Sunday Politics. We say | :32:55. | :32:57. | |
goodbye to viewers in Scotland, who leave us now for Sunday Politics | :32:58. | :33:00. | |
Scotland. Coming up here in 20 minutes, our panel talks about the | :33:01. | :33:03. | |
big stories of the week. First though, | :33:04. | :33:10. | |
Hello once again from the Midlands. I'm Patrick Burns. More now on the | :33:11. | :33:22. | |
great European confrontation everyone's talking about. It's got | :33:23. | :33:25. | |
passion, excitement and a dramatic outcome. No, not that one. Although | :33:26. | :33:29. | |
we do have at least one beard on display. Today we are joined by four | :33:30. | :33:34. | |
of the candidates hoping to be among the seven new MEPs elected when we | :33:35. | :33:41. | |
go to the polls a week on Thursday. Dan Dalton for the Conservatives. | :33:42. | :33:44. | |
Sion Simon for Labour is our one bearded man. Jonathan Webber for the | :33:45. | :33:48. | |
Liberal Democrats. And James Carver for UKIP. A warm welcome to you all. | :33:49. | :33:59. | |
Once every five years comes our biggest collective experience of | :34:00. | :34:02. | |
democracy on a truly epic scale. One giant constituency of nearly six | :34:03. | :34:05. | |
million people, from the Cotswolds to the Staffordshire Moorlands, the | :34:06. | :34:08. | |
West Midlands is about to decide who'll represent us in the next | :34:09. | :34:11. | |
European Parliament. For viewers in Gloucestershire there's a similar | :34:12. | :34:18. | |
contest in South West England. Then there were six. Now there are | :34:19. | :34:22. | |
seven. The Lisbon Treaty has awarded us one more West Midlands MEP. And | :34:23. | :34:26. | |
the battle for that seventh seat could be crucial. For UKIP to have | :34:27. | :34:31. | |
three MEPs here, Bill Etheridge, number three on their party list, | :34:32. | :34:35. | |
must come seventh overall. But the Green Party's Deputy Leader, the | :34:36. | :34:38. | |
Dudley councillor Will Duckworth reckons a swing of under four | :34:39. | :34:42. | |
percent would put him in. Or could seventh go to one of three MEPs in | :34:43. | :34:46. | |
the outgoing Parliament? Phil Bennion, battling to help the | :34:47. | :34:49. | |
Liberal Democrats avoid the dreaded 'whitewash', and the two ex`UKIP | :34:50. | :34:52. | |
MEPs Mike Nattrass and Nikki Sinclaire, who now lead new anti`EU | :34:53. | :34:59. | |
parties. It's a dizzying assortment of ten parties for the voter to sort | :35:00. | :35:03. | |
out, with a clear divide emerging between those who broadly want to | :35:04. | :35:07. | |
keep us in the EU, maybe, and the rest who have a variety of reasons | :35:08. | :35:10. | |
for trying to get themselves in to Europe to get us out. One of the | :35:11. | :35:21. | |
parties is different from the others in that it is more left on the | :35:22. | :35:27. | |
political spectrum. In other cases it is to do with personalities. | :35:28. | :35:33. | |
Tensions that have arisen between UKIP NEP 's. While polling is a week | :35:34. | :35:38. | |
on Thursday, we'll have to wait until a fortnight tonight for the | :35:39. | :35:42. | |
results. They can't be declared until the polls have closed right | :35:43. | :35:51. | |
across the rest of the EU. `` MEPs. And here is that dizzying assortment | :35:52. | :35:55. | |
of names and parties as shown on the ballot paper. You can also look them | :35:56. | :36:00. | |
up on the BBC News Politics website. Our guests today represent the four | :36:01. | :36:02. | |
biggest parties contesting these elections, and this is the first of | :36:03. | :36:11. | |
our two live debates. For the Conservatives, it is a case | :36:12. | :36:21. | |
of having three MEPs going out. With the polls putting your party in | :36:22. | :36:25. | |
third place, you are not going to get in. We have still got ten days | :36:26. | :36:32. | |
until the election. We are confident we have a good message. We believe | :36:33. | :36:37. | |
the message is popular, the British people buy into what we are saying. | :36:38. | :36:42. | |
There is still ten days to go, we are hopeful that we will do better | :36:43. | :36:49. | |
than the polls suggest. Sion, I do not want to give the impression that | :36:50. | :36:55. | |
I am obsessing about the polls. Second place in the polls in a | :36:56. | :36:58. | |
region like this, so full of marginals given everything that has | :36:59. | :37:03. | |
happened in this country. Labour should be doing better than that. | :37:04. | :37:09. | |
Labour is clearly campaigning to be first in the selection. The polls | :37:10. | :37:16. | |
suggest you are not going to be. The polls, say one thing one week and at | :37:17. | :37:22. | |
another thing another. What is interesting is if you look at the | :37:23. | :37:31. | |
national polls, you see that UKIP is polled on 13% rather than 30. Why is | :37:32. | :37:38. | |
that? People treat this election as Nigel Farage wants them to treat it, | :37:39. | :37:44. | |
a referendum on the EU. This is not. This affects people and their lives | :37:45. | :37:50. | |
in the West Midlands. You told us why being in the EU was very much in | :37:51. | :37:57. | |
the Midlands interest, you are the party. Just look at the way the tide | :37:58. | :38:02. | |
is flowing. You have six of the 11 parties campaigning to pull Britain | :38:03. | :38:08. | |
out. That may be the case. I think you will find now that increasingly | :38:09. | :38:15. | |
the polls suggesting we need to concentrate on certain areas. This | :38:16. | :38:21. | |
is a region which depends on Europe for jobs, prosperity and economics. | :38:22. | :38:28. | |
Why is there talk about your party being whitewashed in these | :38:29. | :38:32. | |
elections? We are working very hard to make sure this is not the case. | :38:33. | :38:41. | |
We are putting forward a case now. It is not something you can change | :38:42. | :38:46. | |
overnight. The point that was made in my report earlier on is that the | :38:47. | :38:51. | |
danger from your point of view, the anti`EU vote can be split with so | :38:52. | :38:57. | |
many of these anti`European parties contesting the part of the electoral | :38:58. | :39:00. | |
marketplace that you hold. Consistent opinion polls show, Sion | :39:01. | :39:07. | |
said the battle for first place is between Labour and UKIP. It is clear | :39:08. | :39:20. | |
that UKIP is the main party that oppose it `` Britain's membership of | :39:21. | :39:31. | |
the EU. You did pretty well last night `` time. You are back to | :39:32. | :39:43. | |
around 5.4% in the West Midlands. You perform in European elections | :39:44. | :39:46. | |
and then it is back to politics as normal. Personally I could agree | :39:47. | :39:52. | |
with you on that. But it is a different political climate in | :39:53. | :39:57. | |
Europe `` in Britain just now. We are fighting 74% of local election | :39:58. | :40:08. | |
seats in this election. We think 2015 and the election then, will be | :40:09. | :40:15. | |
very interesting. We hear that voting for you is a protest vote. | :40:16. | :40:23. | |
You cannot do that because you are not one of the above. We have picked | :40:24. | :40:28. | |
up the protest vote in the past. The UKIP support as you have described | :40:29. | :40:39. | |
is a European centric element. I would be as apprised of it was more | :40:40. | :40:44. | |
than skin deep. UKIP say they are doing damage to you, Sion. Is not | :40:45. | :40:51. | |
just the Liberal Democrats and Tories. I think the point I am | :40:52. | :40:58. | |
making is that I think you will see a split on ballot papers because | :40:59. | :41:06. | |
people will vote Labour in the local elections because they want Labour. | :41:07. | :41:10. | |
They will vote UKIP in the European elections as a protest against so | :41:11. | :41:15. | |
many things. My point is that that is an important mistake people not | :41:16. | :41:19. | |
to make. This is not a referendum on the EU, they should vote according | :41:20. | :41:26. | |
to the kind of people that they want to represent them. What about | :41:27. | :41:40. | |
further Tories? I do not believe we're going come third. I don't want | :41:41. | :41:47. | |
to upset with opinion polls, but the arithmetic looks clear enough. We | :41:48. | :41:52. | |
will now soon enough what the actual result is. The European elections | :41:53. | :41:56. | |
when you have been in government for four years and you have had to take | :41:57. | :42:00. | |
difficult decisions on the economy to get it back onto, yes, often it | :42:01. | :42:06. | |
is a protest against the government. UKIP have done well in | :42:07. | :42:10. | |
the last European elections. What have they achieved? Will there be | :42:11. | :42:18. | |
ructions in the Tory party if you don't do well? I think in this case, | :42:19. | :42:25. | |
we know this is a difficult election. The party has bought into | :42:26. | :42:36. | |
the central message that we have, reform, referendum and... The issues | :42:37. | :42:44. | |
around Europe are almost technical, nuanced and complicated. UKIP and | :42:45. | :42:48. | |
many of the conversations around this issue are oversimplified. Dan | :42:49. | :42:56. | |
Mitre said his party has bought into it, but the British people have not. | :42:57. | :43:05. | |
`` might have said. Our position is directly opposite of theirs. It is | :43:06. | :43:10. | |
clear, we have said that we have reached a stage where we cannot | :43:11. | :43:14. | |
renegotiate. If we listen to what some of the EU leaders have said, | :43:15. | :43:20. | |
renegotiation is not an option. David Cameron has said he would not | :43:21. | :43:26. | |
sign up to Prime Minister to a government that did not sign up to a | :43:27. | :43:33. | |
referendum. The Liberal Democrats are the party for Europe. I joined | :43:34. | :43:37. | |
the party because of position on Europe. There is no question that | :43:38. | :43:40. | |
should there be material changes in the future then we would consider | :43:41. | :43:52. | |
this. Thank you very much indeed. The British National Party's | :43:53. | :43:56. | |
cupboard is bare here in our part of the country: no local councillors, | :43:57. | :44:02. | |
and no MEPs in the outgoing Parliament. That's even though they | :44:03. | :44:06. | |
won nearly nine per cent of the vote here last time, higher than in the | :44:07. | :44:09. | |
North West where Nick Griffin was elected. Our BBC Stoke Political | :44:10. | :44:12. | |
Reporter Phil McCann has been charting their fortunes since then. | :44:13. | :44:18. | |
Nick Griffin, ladies and gentlemen. The BNP was riding high in 2009. In | :44:19. | :44:22. | |
2010 it launched its general election manifesto in | :44:23. | :44:24. | |
Stoke`on`Trent, which it used to call the jewel in its crown, because | :44:25. | :44:28. | |
nine of its 16 Midlands councillors where in the city. They won support | :44:29. | :44:31. | |
partly by being visible in communities here, by running bingo | :44:32. | :44:35. | |
clubs. So we came back here to see if views have changed now the BNP | :44:36. | :44:38. | |
have gone. Well, if they want to send the lot back, then yes, I am | :44:39. | :44:43. | |
with them. Don't you think we have got enough in this country? We can't | :44:44. | :44:47. | |
hardly look after our own, can we? Now the British National Party has | :44:48. | :44:49. | |
no councillors here in Stoke`on`Trent, or anywhere in the | :44:50. | :44:52. | |
Midlands. Nationwide, it only has two. One of its MEPs has left the | :44:53. | :44:56. | |
party and its membership has halved. But over the last few years, things | :44:57. | :45:00. | |
have been going wrong for the BNP. It has had a cash crisis after | :45:01. | :45:03. | |
losing a legal challenge through its all`white membership policy and it | :45:04. | :45:06. | |
has been beset by internal disagreements, including from their | :45:07. | :45:08. | |
former leader in Stoke`on`Trent who left saying some party members were | :45:09. | :45:13. | |
Holocaust deniers. And to make things harder for the party, its | :45:14. | :45:16. | |
number one candidate in the region, has a suspended prison sentence for | :45:17. | :45:19. | |
racially aggrevated harassment after comments he made about black people | :45:20. | :45:27. | |
after the 2011 riots. But they are still out pounding the streets | :45:28. | :45:31. | |
looking for votes. Our view, our party's view on mass immigration to | :45:32. | :45:35. | |
Britian is that it is an illegal process. It is illegal. It has never | :45:36. | :45:38. | |
been sanctioned by the British people and it is a project of social | :45:39. | :45:42. | |
engineering and social change on a national level, involving vast | :45:43. | :45:44. | |
number of foreigners. That should have been taken to the people. It is | :45:45. | :45:49. | |
a message from an extremist party but a message that has now become | :45:50. | :45:53. | |
more mainstream, while the BNP have been left on the margins. | :45:54. | :46:00. | |
Phil McCann. And next week we'll be hearing from our two former UKIP | :46:01. | :46:03. | |
MEPs in the outgoing Parliament, Mike Nattrass and Nikki Sinclaire, | :46:04. | :46:05. | |
who're now heading new anti`EU parties. Jim, UKIP make some play | :46:06. | :46:21. | |
that says UKIP bands ex`BNP people from standing for you. We have had a | :46:22. | :46:28. | |
huge media campaign against us. It seems to me completely unfair that | :46:29. | :46:34. | |
the media and our political opponents say that if you discuss | :46:35. | :46:38. | |
this issue of open`door immigration which only can be challenged from a | :46:39. | :46:42. | |
position outside the European union, is you are racist. A quick | :46:43. | :46:53. | |
reflection from others of you. I am delighted. I could it `` not put it | :46:54. | :47:02. | |
more simply than that. It is good that we have a discussion on | :47:03. | :47:06. | |
immigration on this country more openly and that people feel more lax | :47:07. | :47:10. | |
about. I think it is better if we are going to have a single issue | :47:11. | :47:16. | |
emigration party, it is better for it to be a party like UKIP which | :47:17. | :47:21. | |
doesn't have that overtone of militarism and racism and nastier | :47:22. | :47:26. | |
people like the BNP. `` immigration. It shows how important it is to get | :47:27. | :47:32. | |
out and vote for the European election. It is important that we | :47:33. | :47:37. | |
get people to vote, whoever they are voting for. Now our regular round`up | :47:38. | :47:43. | |
of the political week in the Midlands in 60 seconds. | :47:44. | :47:46. | |
It's a campaign special again this week, brought to us by BBC WM's | :47:47. | :47:48. | |
Lunchtime presenter, Caroline Martin. | :47:49. | :47:53. | |
Former Coventry Labour MP Dave Nellist is the lead candidate for | :47:54. | :47:56. | |
the no to EU party in the West Midlands. They have a left wing take | :47:57. | :48:03. | |
on Euroscepticism. Their next target, according to the Financial | :48:04. | :48:06. | |
Times, is the ?450 billion public sector of health and education | :48:07. | :48:09. | |
across Europe, that they want to open up to competition to private | :48:10. | :48:16. | |
companies. We are dead against that. The Green party was in Solihull for | :48:17. | :48:20. | |
the national launch of its local election campaign. Leader, Natalie | :48:21. | :48:23. | |
Bennett said she believes they can make inroads in the West Midlands. | :48:24. | :48:26. | |
Elsewhere in Solihull, at the local farmers' market there was confusion | :48:27. | :48:29. | |
over what individual parties stand for in Europe and who some of the | :48:30. | :48:35. | |
candidates are. What about this one? Do you recognise that man? Did he | :48:36. | :48:42. | |
not have a thing on television? Jerry Springer? Jerry Springer, | :48:43. | :48:47. | |
that's right. You can see how it might happen, by the way. Mike | :48:48. | :48:50. | |
Nattrass is the one without the specs in case you were wondering. | :48:51. | :49:00. | |
We are having a laugh, Sion. It makes a serious point how | :49:01. | :49:08. | |
low`profile the European Parliament is. How do you combat this | :49:09. | :49:15. | |
perception that it is a repository for retreads and reject | :49:16. | :49:19. | |
politicians? It is not surprisingly people have not heard of their MEP. | :49:20. | :49:25. | |
We have nearly 6 million people in our region. The only way people will | :49:26. | :49:32. | |
have heard of their MEP is if the activities of the European | :49:33. | :49:34. | |
Parliament were regularly reported in the media. We are constantly on | :49:35. | :49:46. | |
the lookout. I am not having a go it you, Patrick. I am saying that the | :49:47. | :49:53. | |
entire British media does not cover very important work that goes on day | :49:54. | :49:58. | |
after day, week after week in Europe at all. So how will people ever hear | :49:59. | :50:05. | |
of their MEPs? There is a real point that there is something uninspiring | :50:06. | :50:11. | |
about the lack of linkage, who represents our region in a | :50:12. | :50:18. | |
Parliament of this scale? It is a great shame that over the years we | :50:19. | :50:24. | |
have not had the attention and virginity needed. `` opportunity. | :50:25. | :50:30. | |
The huge amount that is done through Europe, it is not fed through to us | :50:31. | :50:36. | |
all the time. If there was more public awareness, there would be | :50:37. | :50:41. | |
more dialogue. What would you do, Jim, to build public awareness? Your | :50:42. | :50:47. | |
party has been accused of not being the most active in terms of the | :50:48. | :50:52. | |
business that you attend? It is the same question with regard to all | :50:53. | :50:56. | |
parties. Some other MEPs are ready high performing in the parliament, | :50:57. | :51:06. | |
some are not. What we want to do is seek our withdrawal from the | :51:07. | :51:08. | |
European Union, let's make no secret about it. If I do find myself | :51:09. | :51:19. | |
elected, 92% of the population of this country cannot name their MEP. | :51:20. | :51:26. | |
If I am elected, I will be elected to a chamber as a parliamentarian, | :51:27. | :51:29. | |
the only Parliament in Western Europe which will not bail to | :51:30. | :51:37. | |
instigate legislation. It looks ironic that you are trying to get | :51:38. | :51:41. | |
yourself into the European Parliament and yet the grandson well | :51:42. | :51:46. | |
increasingly `` ground swell, is all about and in out referendum with the | :51:47. | :51:52. | |
assumption that it is a party that is heading out. The key part of | :51:53. | :51:59. | |
policy is we want to renegotiate our relationship with Europe. We want to | :52:00. | :52:06. | |
bring powers back. David Cameron has made it clear the areas we want to | :52:07. | :52:11. | |
renegotiate. That is the essence of policy. After that we should put | :52:12. | :52:16. | |
that to the British people to decide. That is not a party position | :52:17. | :52:20. | |
of being in or out, that is about letting the people decide. At salute | :52:21. | :52:30. | |
the fascinating and we could go on. Next week we will do something very | :52:31. | :52:36. | |
much like this again. My thanks to Dan, Sion, Jonathan and | :52:37. | :52:39. | |
Jim. And we'll be re`dressing our gender`balance next week, when we'll | :52:40. | :52:43. | |
Conservatives, Neena Gill for Labour Conservatives, Neena Gill for Labour | :52:44. | :52:46. | |
and Jill Seymour for UKIP, with the Liberal Democrat MEP Phil Bennion, | :52:47. | :52:49. | |
the only other man among us. And with less than a year to go to the | :52:50. | :52:53. | |
General Election, we'll examine how this month's local elections could | :52:54. | :52:56. | |
provide pointers in our key marginals, including a report from | :52:57. | :52:59. | |
Tamworth which is a prime Labour target. This though is where we | :53:00. | :53:01. | |
rejoin Andrew Neil. the website now. Now it is back to | :53:02. | :53:04. | |
you, Andrew. Welcome back, let's go straight to | :53:05. | :53:23. | |
our panel. What did you make of Mr Alexander's defence of the Labour | :53:24. | :53:28. | |
party election broadcast? It is difficult for them because they | :53:29. | :53:30. | |
started by saying they were not going to do negative campaigning and | :53:31. | :53:35. | |
they have thrown that away for an advert which is funny but crude in | :53:36. | :53:42. | |
the class war sense. He didn't look thrilled to be defending it. There | :53:43. | :53:50. | |
is a page in Tony Blair's memoirs talking about negative campaigning, | :53:51. | :53:53. | |
and he says that anything too extreme turns off the average voter | :53:54. | :53:59. | |
so his line of attack on Hague was funny jokes but... I think this | :54:00. | :54:10. | |
failed the Blair test, it was too vicious. If your strategy is to | :54:11. | :54:17. | |
shore up your car vote, that advert was genius. If your strategy is to | :54:18. | :54:21. | |
reach out to a broader number of voters, Middle Britain, then that | :54:22. | :54:27. | |
advert was a complete disaster. It looks like there is a lot of | :54:28. | :54:31. | |
negativity and smears all round in the next year. That definitely looks | :54:32. | :54:42. | |
the way we are going. They will be essentially trying to re-run by -- | :54:43. | :55:01. | |
the American election. I am slightly puzzled why we cannot have our own | :55:02. | :55:06. | |
election gurus who live here and understand the country. I should | :55:07. | :55:12. | |
point out that the ?450 extra VAT that was claimed in that Labour | :55:13. | :55:17. | |
poster, both Ed Balls and the Labour Treasury team have said that is ?450 | :55:18. | :55:23. | |
per year. Nonsense the VAT rise, one year. I should also point out that | :55:24. | :55:29. | |
Nigel Farage said to Norman Smith, the BBC is always reliable Norman | :55:30. | :55:37. | |
Smith that if you run in Newark and lost the bubble would burst. I | :55:38. | :55:41. | |
should also point out that although a number of the tax rises I | :55:42. | :55:45. | |
mentioned on council tax, minimum wage tax and some other things that | :55:46. | :55:50. | |
UKIP wants to cuts, a couple of these are in the local manifesto but | :55:51. | :55:56. | |
several are not. They are on the UKIP website, which is still current | :55:57. | :56:04. | |
and dated 2014. We like to make sure we are absolutely right. Let's talk | :56:05. | :56:09. | |
about Nick Clegg and Michael Gove and the latest spat. Let me show you | :56:10. | :56:13. | |
this headline in the Observer this morning. From both the Independent, | :56:14. | :56:22. | |
he called him a zealot, lunatic is of -- another word. Do we take this | :56:23. | :56:33. | |
seriously? It hinges on this question of what counts as an area | :56:34. | :56:39. | |
of need in education. The Lib Dems say an area of need is one where | :56:40. | :56:42. | |
there are not enough school places to meet local demand. He says it can | :56:43. | :56:47. | |
also be a place where there are surplus places but that is for a | :56:48. | :56:51. | |
reason. Local places don't trust those schools to do a good job for | :56:52. | :57:04. | |
their kids. It surprises me because there isn't a yawning distance | :57:05. | :57:09. | |
between David Laws and Michael Gove. David Laws has found himself between | :57:10. | :57:14. | |
a rock and a hard place because I asked -- as I understand it most Lib | :57:15. | :57:18. | |
Dems don't like the free schools but Mr laws was quite sympathetic to it | :57:19. | :57:22. | |
and he is now having to this respect it. When they asked people who are | :57:23. | :57:29. | |
the most hated politicians in a poll were this week, Michael Gove is off | :57:30. | :57:35. | |
the charts, far above David Cameron or George Osborne. This is | :57:36. | :57:48. | |
tit-for-tat war. The Liberal Democrats believe Michael Gove had a | :57:49. | :57:52. | |
hand in leaking the document that showed Nick Clegg was opposing the | :57:53. | :57:56. | |
tougher Chris Grayling position on knife crime. They are saying there | :57:57. | :58:00. | |
were Cabinet ministers who never usually attend the sub Cabinet | :58:01. | :58:05. | |
meeting, they turned up and the document is leaked so what we are | :58:06. | :58:09. | |
getting is tit for tat on that. It is inevitable but it is not good for | :58:10. | :58:15. | |
either side of the Coalition. Voters will look at it and say it is | :58:16. | :58:20. | |
politics of the playground. I read in the Mail on Sunday this morning | :58:21. | :58:31. | |
that some Tory insiders are accusing Lib Dems of spreading rumours about | :58:32. | :58:36. | |
the camera in marriage. The rebuttals of education story is that | :58:37. | :58:43. | |
the free school meals is sucking money away. I always thought they | :58:44. | :58:53. | |
would work together without fuss and yet it has been more the source of | :58:54. | :58:59. | |
disagreement then I would have expected a couple of years ago. Is | :59:00. | :59:04. | |
it serious? It is serious obviously, using that language, but is it fatal | :59:05. | :59:11. | |
for the Coalition? I think it is a road bump because I don't think | :59:12. | :59:14. | |
anybody wants to dissolve the Coalition. It is a challenge for | :59:15. | :59:18. | |
Labour because where do they stand on the free schools? They invented | :59:19. | :59:22. | |
the Academy programme so it is difficult for them to take a | :59:23. | :59:27. | |
hands-off approach at this stage. There was a danger for Michael Gove | :59:28. | :59:30. | |
that he looks ideological but the danger for the Liberal Democrats is | :59:31. | :59:34. | |
that they are breaking the rules for the Coalition they said that they | :59:35. | :59:38. | |
wouldn't break which is that they looked like opposition in | :59:39. | :59:43. | |
government. Is Michael Gove's position safe? Very safe. If he | :59:44. | :59:50. | |
moves in a reshuffle that will be to a a job. That's all for today. The | :59:51. | :59:56. | |
Daily Politics will be back on BBC Two at lunchtime from Tuesday | :59:57. | :59:59. | |
onwards. I'll be back here on BBC One at 11am next week. Remember if | :00:00. | :00:02. | |
it's Sunday, it's the Sunday Politics. | :00:03. | :00:51. | |
What if the person that killed her... | :00:52. | :00:52. | |
I found out she'd been taking drugs. Just let me explain. | :00:53. | :00:56. | |
You wasn't at that party all night. Yeah, I was. | :00:57. | :00:59. | |
What was she even doing there? Oi, you keep your mouth shut. | :01:00. | :01:02. | |
She was exchanging a significant number of texts and calls | :01:03. | :01:04. | |
with someone in the weeks leading up to her death. | :01:05. | :01:07. | |
It's like we didn't really know her at all. | :01:08. | :01:10. |