Browse content similar to 06/04/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning folks. Welcome to the Sunday Politics. | :00:36. | :00:39. | |
Pressure on Culture Secretary Maria Miller mounts as the Tory press | :00:40. | :00:42. | |
Tory voters and even a Tory Minister turn against her. That's our top | :00:43. | :00:47. | |
story. The economic outlook is getting | :00:48. | :00:50. | |
rosier. But Ed Miliband is having none of it. The cost of living | :00:51. | :00:55. | |
crisis is here to stay, says Labour. Shadow Minister Caroline Flint joins | :00:56. | :01:05. | |
us for the Sunday Interview. And we bring you the Sunday Politics | :01:06. | :01:08. | |
Gallery. But which former world leader is behind these paintings of | :01:09. | :01:10. | |
In awe of you. world leaders? | :01:11. | :01:23. | |
new London borough. A blue flint for regeneration or economic Armageddon? | :01:24. | :01:32. | |
And with me as always, the best and the brightest political panel in the | :01:33. | :01:37. | |
business - Janan Ganesh, Helen Lewis and Nick Watt. Their tweets will be | :01:38. | :01:40. | |
as brief as a Cabinet Minister's apology. | :01:41. | :01:45. | |
A frenzy of betting on the Grand National yesterday. But there was | :01:46. | :01:50. | |
one book on which betting was suspended, and that was on the fate | :01:51. | :01:53. | |
of Culture Secretary Maria Miller, now the 2/1 favourite to be forced | :01:54. | :01:56. | |
out the Cabinet. She galloped through her apology to the Commons | :01:57. | :01:59. | |
on Thursday in just 32 seconds. But speed did her no favours. There s | :02:00. | :02:03. | |
been mounting pressure on her to resign ever since, especially from | :02:04. | :02:07. | |
Tories. And this weekend the Chairman of the Independent | :02:08. | :02:09. | |
Parliamentary Standards Authority, Ian Kennedy, said it's time MPs gave | :02:10. | :02:12. | |
away the power to decide how colleagues who break the rules are | :02:13. | :02:26. | |
punished. An inquiry into Maria Miller's expenses claims was launch | :02:27. | :02:32. | |
in 2012, following allegations he claimed ?90,000 to fund a house she | :02:33. | :02:37. | |
lived in part time with her parents. She had designated this her second | :02:38. | :02:42. | |
home. She was referred to the Parliamentary Standards | :02:43. | :02:44. | |
Commissioner, who recommended that she repay ?45,000. But this week the | :02:45. | :02:51. | |
Commons Standards Committee, comprising of MPs from all parties, | :02:52. | :02:55. | |
dismissed the complaint against Maria Miller and ordered her to | :02:56. | :03:02. | |
repay just ?5,800 for inadvertently overclaiming her merge claimants. | :03:03. | :03:09. | |
She was forced to apologise to the Commons for the legalistic way she | :03:10. | :03:13. | |
dealt with the complaints against her. But Tony Gallagher told the | :03:14. | :03:18. | |
Daily Politics on Friday: We got a third call from Craig Oliver who | :03:19. | :03:23. | |
pointed out, she is looking at Leveson and the call is badly timed. | :03:24. | :03:27. | |
I think if you are making a series of telephone calls to a newspaper | :03:28. | :03:29. | |
organisation investigating the conduct of a Cabinet Minister, that | :03:30. | :03:31. | |
comes close After that interview Craig Oliver | :03:32. | :03:36. | |
contacted us, saying there was no threat in anyway over Leveson. I | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
mead it clear at the time. Tony Gallagher is talking rubbish about | :03:41. | :03:45. | |
me, and you can use that. The Daily Telegraph have released a tape of a | :03:46. | :03:48. | |
phone call between Maria Miller s aid, Joanna Hindley, and a reporter | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
investigating her expenses claim. Joanna Hindley said: | :03:54. | :03:58. | |
Maria's obviously been having quite a lot of editor's meetings around | :03:59. | :04:05. | |
Leveson at the moment. So I'm just going to kind of flag up that | :04:06. | :04:10. | |
connection for you to think about. The Prime Minister is sticking by | :04:11. | :04:13. | |
his Culture Secretary, but this weekend's crescendo of criticism of | :04:14. | :04:16. | |
her presents him with a problem and he could be wishing Maria Miller | :04:17. | :04:19. | |
would just fall on her sword. Even over 80% of Tory voters in a Mail on | :04:20. | :04:25. | |
Sunday poll think she should go On the Andrew Marr Show, the Work and | :04:26. | :04:28. | |
Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, defended his colleague. I've | :04:29. | :04:35. | |
known her always to be a reasonable and honest person. But is she doing | :04:36. | :04:40. | |
the Government or her any good by staying in office at the moment do | :04:41. | :04:43. | |
you think? This is a matter the Prime Minister has to take | :04:44. | :04:47. | |
consideration of and she herself. My view generally is I'm supportive of | :04:48. | :04:52. | |
Maria, because if we are not careful we end one a witch-hunt of somebody. | :04:53. | :04:57. | |
And I'm joined now by the Conservative MP, Bob Stewart, and | :04:58. | :05:00. | |
the man in the white suit, former MP and anti-sleaze campaigner Martin | :05:01. | :05:02. | |
Bell. Welcome to you both. Stuart Stuart sturkts let me put this to | :05:03. | :05:05. | |
you, a Conservative MP told this programme, this is a quote, she has | :05:06. | :05:09. | |
handled this appallingly. Downing Street has acted like judge and | :05:10. | :05:15. | |
jury, for Craig Oliver to get involved is disastrous. She's been | :05:16. | :05:18. | |
protected by the whips from the start. What do you say to that? It's | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
not great, is it? The fact of the matter is the question one should | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
ask is, did she deliberately try to make money? Did she deliberately try | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
to obscure ate? The answer is she certainly didn't deliberately try to | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
make money, in the system, which was the old system, and with regard to | :05:38. | :05:41. | |
obscure ago, I wasn't there, but let's put it this way. She was going | :05:42. | :05:46. | |
through a quasi-judicial process and might have ended up in court, so she | :05:47. | :05:51. | |
has a right to defend herself. Hold on o you said she doesn't do it to | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
make money, she remortgaged the house a couple of times to earn more | :05:57. | :06:00. | |
interest to us, the taxpayer, and when interest rates went down she | :06:01. | :06:04. | |
didn't reduce the amount she was charging in expenses. Well, the | :06:05. | :06:09. | |
point is the adjudicator said there was ?45,000 she was owed. And then a | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
committee, Standards Committee, said actually it should be reduced. That | :06:15. | :06:19. | |
was mainly MPs but there are three lay members. Yes, but they don't | :06:20. | :06:23. | |
have the vote. OK, fine, that is where it is wrong and we've got to | :06:24. | :06:27. | |
get it sorted. Let me put another quote from our Conservative MP. He | :06:28. | :06:31. | |
didn't want to be named. None of you do at the moment. I'm being named. | :06:32. | :06:37. | |
But you are backing her. George young in cahoots. He's been leading | :06:38. | :06:40. | |
on the Standards Committee to find her innocent. The Standards | :06:41. | :06:45. | |
Committee is unfit for purpose. I think the Standards Committee should | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
be revisited. I think the system is still evolving. And I think actually | :06:50. | :06:55. | |
we ought to have totally independent judgment on MPs' pay and allowances. | :06:56. | :06:59. | |
We haven't have not got there yet and that is where it is wrong. | :07:00. | :07:04. | |
Martin Bell, have MPs interfered in the Maria Miller process and with | :07:05. | :07:07. | |
the current Standards Commissioner in the same way that they saw off a | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
previous Commissioner they thought was too independent? Andrew it is | :07:12. | :07:17. | |
exactly the same. Yesterday I looked at a diary entry I made for May | :07:18. | :07:25. | |
2000, I said, dreadful meeting standards and privileges, they are | :07:26. | :07:31. | |
playing party politics. One of them told Elizabeth fill kin to her face | :07:32. | :07:37. | |
the gossip in the tea room was she had gone crazy. Nothing's changed. | :07:38. | :07:41. | |
What this shows is most of all, what's the committee for? If it is | :07:42. | :07:46. | |
just going to rubber stamp what the party wants and its mates, I don't | :07:47. | :07:52. | |
see any point. But it hasn't rubber stamped. It's changed it. Well, it | :07:53. | :07:56. | |
has watered down. That's why we should make it totally independent | :07:57. | :08:00. | |
and it shouldn't be involved in the House of Commons. It is plus plus ca | :08:01. | :08:08. | |
change isn't it? MPs', scandal, and MPs closing ranks for one of their | :08:09. | :08:13. | |
own. Has the Commons learned nothing? And this is after the | :08:14. | :08:17. | |
expenses scandal, where everything was out for everybody to see, you | :08:18. | :08:22. | |
would think MPs would be careful. This is before the expenses scandal. | :08:23. | :08:26. | |
We are looking at an historical event, during your time, Martin not | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
mine. I'm clean on this. You campaigned for him as an | :08:31. | :08:35. | |
independent. I did, he was a good friend of mine. And now you've | :08:36. | :08:40. | |
joined the club. And now you are defending Maria Miller? I'm | :08:41. | :08:44. | |
defending someone who hasn't been proved guilty of anything beyond the | :08:45. | :08:47. | |
fact she was rather slow to come forward with evidence. My point on | :08:48. | :08:52. | |
that, is I understand that. MPs are being lambasted the whole time these | :08:53. | :08:57. | |
days. There were a heck of a lot of them, Martin, who are utterly | :08:58. | :09:01. | |
decent. She didn't try to make money. We've just been through that. | :09:02. | :09:05. | |
I don't think that's right. The jury is out on that. What should have | :09:06. | :09:10. | |
happened in the Miller case, Martin Bell? I don't think there should be | :09:11. | :09:14. | |
a committee on standards. I think the Commissioner should make a | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
report. There has been to be justice for the MP complained against. Then | :09:19. | :09:22. | |
the committee of the whole House can consider it. But we are, the House | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
of Commons, then as now is incapable of regulating itself. That's been | :09:28. | :09:34. | |
proving yet again. She made a perfunctory apology. She threatened | :09:35. | :09:39. | |
and instructed the Standards Commissioner investigating her, and | :09:40. | :09:43. | |
her special adviser linked expenses to Leveson, when trying to stop the | :09:44. | :09:47. | |
Daily Telegraph from publishing I mean, is that the behaviour of a | :09:48. | :09:52. | |
Cabinet Minister? Well, it's probably not the behaviour of | :09:53. | :09:54. | |
someone that's got time on their hands. She's a very busy Cabinet | :09:55. | :10:00. | |
Minister. Well, she had enough time to write lots of letters to the | :10:01. | :10:05. | |
Standards Commission ser. She felt under such threat. She had the time. | :10:06. | :10:13. | |
She had to make the time. Die know the lady is not trying desperately | :10:14. | :10:16. | |
to make money. I disagree but on that. The fact of the matter is | :10:17. | :10:21. | |
this was an old, old system, that we've tried to put right, or the | :10:22. | :10:26. | |
Commons has tried to put right. I agree that MPs shouldn't get | :10:27. | :10:30. | |
involved in this. Should we get rid of this committee? It serves no | :10:31. | :10:36. | |
purpose except to cause trouble The adjudicator has said that and it | :10:37. | :10:39. | |
should be the end of it. It shouldn't come back to the Commons. | :10:40. | :10:44. | |
Although her special adviser threatened them over Leveson she was | :10:45. | :10:48. | |
and is the Minister responsible for trying to introduce something like | :10:49. | :10:53. | |
Leveson and that is something a big chunk that the press doesn't want. | :10:54. | :11:00. | |
She is a target. It has a good record on this issue. It played wit | :11:01. | :11:06. | |
a straight bat. The facts aren't in dispute are they? Will she make it | :11:07. | :11:11. | |
to the next cabinet reshuffle and then go? Iain Duncan Smith said it | :11:12. | :11:15. | |
is a matter for the Prime Minister. In my view, as things stand, I | :11:16. | :11:21. | |
question did she deliberately want to make money? I don't think she | :11:22. | :11:27. | |
did. Should she go? No. Should she be reshuffled? I don't know. | :11:28. | :11:31. | |
Goodness me, you are asking someone who will never be reshuffled, | :11:32. | :11:36. | |
because he will never make it. I was only asking for your opinion, not | :11:37. | :11:40. | |
your ability to do it. This is a problem for Cameron isn't it? It is | :11:41. | :11:45. | |
a problem for Cameron. There is nothing wrong with returning to be | :11:46. | :11:52. | |
badge benches, as you know. Hear, hear. To that. Stick with me. Helen, | :11:53. | :11:58. | |
can she survive? Is I'm going out of the prediction game when I said | :11:59. | :12:04. | |
Clegg is going to win the date, so I owe Janan a tenner on that one. | :12:05. | :12:10. | |
Grant Shapps has supported her. She was ringed by Sir George young and | :12:11. | :12:17. | |
Jeremy Hunt... This is pretty devastating. On past form David | :12:18. | :12:22. | |
Cameron hates having to bounce people out of the cabinet. He will | :12:23. | :12:28. | |
want to keep Maria Miller until the summer reshuffle. This is a question | :12:29. | :12:31. | |
mark on whether she survive this is. This isn't damaging to the | :12:32. | :12:33. | |
Conservative or the Labour Party, it is damaging to everyone. This is | :12:34. | :12:39. | |
catastrophic damage to the entire political establishment. Every | :12:40. | :12:42. | |
single speech that David Cameron and Ed Miliband have given since 20 9, | :12:43. | :12:46. | |
talking about restoring trust, they can wipe them from their computers, | :12:47. | :12:50. | |
because voters are going to look that there and say, this lot haven't | :12:51. | :12:55. | |
learnt anything. They are giving perfunctory apologies and then you | :12:56. | :13:00. | |
have MPs sitting in judgment on MPs and rather than paying back ?45 000, | :13:01. | :13:06. | |
she pays back ?5,800 after MPs have been into it. Damage is huge. Just | :13:07. | :13:11. | |
getting rid of one Cabinet Minister, you will need to do more than that. | :13:12. | :13:15. | |
You will notice that Labour haven't made huge weather of this. No, | :13:16. | :13:19. | |
goodness me, they have their own skeletons. Exactly. The person who | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
has made hay out of this is Nigel Farage, who has not been backwards | :13:25. | :13:29. | |
in coming forward. He doesn't seem to care about skeletons. The Prime | :13:30. | :13:34. | |
Minister has be-Gunby backing her, but that's not popular even with | :13:35. | :13:38. | |
Tory voters. How does he get out of this? This is the problem for him. | :13:39. | :13:43. | |
Five years ago his reaction to the expenses scandal was seen by many | :13:44. | :13:49. | |
Tory backbenchers as excessive. They felt hung out to dry by a man who is | :13:50. | :13:53. | |
independently wealthy. To go from that to making a special exemption | :13:54. | :13:58. | |
to Maria Miller because it is politically suitable is more | :13:59. | :14:02. | |
incendiary and provocative. It is not just upsetting the voters and | :14:03. | :14:04. | |
the Daily Telegraph but a good number of people behind him. I think | :14:05. | :14:08. | |
they will get rid of her. I think the Government, to paraphrase | :14:09. | :14:14. | |
Churchill, will zoo the decent thing after exhausting all options, of the | :14:15. | :14:21. | |
European elections a reshuffle. The culture department has gone from a | :14:22. | :14:27. | |
baulk water in haul to one of the most politically sensational jobs | :14:28. | :14:29. | |
because of its proximity to the Leveson issue. She has to be | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
replaced by someone Lily skillful and substantial. Mr Cameron is not | :14:35. | :14:49. | |
short of smart women? Nikki Morgan, the education department, these are | :14:50. | :14:55. | |
absolutely outstanding women and the problem that the generation elected | :14:56. | :15:01. | |
in 2005, Maria Miller generation, there are some really good people | :15:02. | :15:09. | |
elected in 2010. You are not responsible for hacking into the | :15:10. | :15:13. | |
culture Department's Twitter account last night? I was out at the time! | :15:14. | :15:24. | |
They all say that! One so, Maria Miller is like a modern-day Robin | :15:25. | :15:28. | |
Hood... She robs the poor to help the rich. Which one of us has not | :15:29. | :15:35. | |
embezzled the taxpayer? I reckon it is the lady. You have the perfect | :15:36. | :15:44. | |
cover. We would not know how to would we? You cannot tweet from a | :15:45. | :15:54. | |
mobile device, can you? Play it safe. No, do something dramatic | :15:55. | :15:58. | |
Have lots of pledges. Have just a few pledges. Ah, there must be a | :15:59. | :16:01. | |
Labour policy review reaching its conclusion because everyone has some | :16:02. | :16:04. | |
free advice for the party about its message and the man delivering it. | :16:05. | :16:12. | |
Here's Adam. He is well liked by the public don't quite buy him as a | :16:13. | :16:18. | |
leader. The papers say he is in hock to the unions and the party has a | :16:19. | :16:21. | |
lead in the polls but it is not solid. Bartenders Neil Kinnock. That | :16:22. | :16:26. | |
is what they said Winnie who lost the 1982 election. The whole country | :16:27. | :16:34. | |
deserves better and we will work to ensure that the day will come when | :16:35. | :16:41. | |
with the Labour government, the country will get better. Someone who | :16:42. | :16:46. | |
was there can see some spooky parallels. The important lesson from | :16:47. | :16:52. | |
1992 is it cannot rest on your laurels and hope for the best, you | :16:53. | :16:56. | |
cannot sit on a lead of seven points because the election narrows that | :16:57. | :17:01. | |
and you cannot rely on the government not getting its act | :17:02. | :17:04. | |
together because the Conservative Party was well funded and organised, | :17:05. | :17:08. | |
the double whammy posters, the tax bombshell, but incredibly effective | :17:09. | :17:14. | |
and the message was unified and they beat us on the campaign. The lesson | :17:15. | :17:20. | |
for Labour today is this lead will evaporate quite possibly over the | :17:21. | :17:23. | |
next few months and we might go into the election behind in the polls. | :17:24. | :17:29. | |
But Ed Miliband is getting conflicting advice about how to | :17:30. | :17:33. | |
avoid 1992 happening. Be bold, be cautious and then, the idea that | :17:34. | :17:39. | |
Labour can squeak into office with just 35% of the vote, which worries | :17:40. | :17:45. | |
some people. Each month, the Labour Party meets around the country and | :17:46. | :17:51. | |
last week, everybody spoke about the dangers of this 35% strategy. They | :17:52. | :17:56. | |
were increasingly unhappy and it is very important that those people | :17:57. | :18:01. | |
around the leader naturally have a duty to protect him and they make | :18:02. | :18:07. | |
sure he gets this message that while there is total support for him, they | :18:08. | :18:13. | |
do want this key year in the run-up to the General Election to be | :18:14. | :18:16. | |
putting out an alternative which we can defend on the doorstep. The | :18:17. | :18:22. | |
doorstep where Neil Kinnock made his concession speech is crammed with | :18:23. | :18:27. | |
Spanish back hackers. The old Labour offices are no a budget hostel. | :18:28. | :18:35. | |
Labour headquarters is down the road and they are putting the finishing | :18:36. | :18:39. | |
touches to a speech Ed Miliband will give this week about the cost of | :18:40. | :18:42. | |
living and I am told he will drop hints about new policies in juicy | :18:43. | :18:47. | |
areas like housing, low pay, growth and devolving power. As for the | :18:48. | :18:51. | |
charge that they are not radical enough, his people say they want to | :18:52. | :18:55. | |
be bold but they have to be credible as well. They say that Labour is | :18:56. | :19:00. | |
more united than it has ever been but there has been some grumbling | :19:01. | :19:04. | |
that the cost of living campaign is not the same as a vision for the | :19:05. | :19:08. | |
country. And that Ed Miliband was not statesman-like enough at Prime | :19:09. | :19:13. | |
Minister's Questions and one figure who sat at the same table in the | :19:14. | :19:16. | |
Neil Kinnock years summed it up like this. Things are OK but it feels | :19:17. | :19:22. | |
like we're playing for the draw Shadow Energy Secretary Caroline | :19:23. | :19:25. | |
Flint joins me now for the Sunday Interview. This 35% victory | :19:26. | :19:39. | |
strategy, it does not sound very ambitious? I am campaigning to win | :19:40. | :19:46. | |
this election with a majority government and everybody else around | :19:47. | :19:50. | |
the table is also. But we want to go to every corner of the country and | :19:51. | :19:55. | |
win votes for Labour and win seats, that is what we are working towards. | :19:56. | :20:00. | |
To avoid last time, the coalition bartering. But that 35% is a victory | :20:01. | :20:08. | |
strategy so are you saying there is no 35% strategy and that no one at | :20:09. | :20:13. | |
the heart of Labour is not arguing for this? We are working to win | :20:14. | :20:19. | |
around the country and to win all of those battle ground seats and we | :20:20. | :20:23. | |
must have a strategy that appeals to a cross-section of the public but | :20:24. | :20:27. | |
within that, that broad group Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and. You | :20:28. | :20:38. | |
could do that with 35% of the vote? There is lots of polling and | :20:39. | :20:40. | |
everyone looks at this about what we need to do to get seats and we want | :20:41. | :20:46. | |
to have a comprehensive majority at the next election to win to govern | :20:47. | :20:54. | |
this country. Last week, we have been reading reports of splits in | :20:55. | :20:58. | |
the party over policy and on tactics, even strategy. A struggle | :20:59. | :21:03. | |
for control of the General Election manifesto, we are told. What are you | :21:04. | :21:11. | |
arguing over? I said on the committee and just listening to the | :21:12. | :21:13. | |
film before, it is about being radical but also credible and we are | :21:14. | :21:18. | |
talking about evolution and that is an important subject but we are also | :21:19. | :21:25. | |
united and to be honest, in 201 people were writing us off saying we | :21:26. | :21:28. | |
would turn on ourselves and that has not been the case. We are not | :21:29. | :21:34. | |
arguing about the fundamentals, we are discussing the policies that are | :21:35. | :21:38. | |
coming up with different colleagues and talking about how we can make | :21:39. | :21:42. | |
sure they are presented to the public and that is part of a | :21:43. | :21:45. | |
process. That is a discussion, not disagreement. The Financial Times, | :21:46. | :21:53. | |
which is usually pretty fair, reports a battle between Ed | :21:54. | :21:58. | |
Miliband's radical instincts and the more business fiscal conservatism of | :21:59. | :22:03. | |
Ed Balls. What side are you on? I am for radical change, I am for energy | :22:04. | :22:08. | |
and I believe strongly we must be formed the market and people might | :22:09. | :22:12. | |
portray that as anti-business but this is about more competition and | :22:13. | :22:18. | |
transparency and others coming into this market so our policy on this is | :22:19. | :22:22. | |
radical, not excepting the status quo. It is also for business. | :22:23. | :22:30. | |
Opinion polls show that few people regard Ed Miliband as by Minister | :22:31. | :22:39. | |
material -- Prime Minister material. That has been true since he became | :22:40. | :22:44. | |
leader. And in some cases, they have been getting worse. Why is that | :22:45. | :22:50. | |
Opinion polls say certain things about the personalities of leaders, | :22:51. | :22:55. | |
David Cameron is not great either. And they were not great when he was | :22:56. | :23:01. | |
in opposition. At this stage, he was getting 49% as Prime Minister real | :23:02. | :23:08. | |
material and Ed Miliband, 19. - Prime Minister material. When you | :23:09. | :23:15. | |
look at certain questions that the public is asked about who you think | :23:16. | :23:19. | |
you would trust about being fair in terms of policy towards Britain who | :23:20. | :23:22. | |
understands the cost of living crisis, they very much identify with | :23:23. | :23:28. | |
Ed Miliband. We are ahead in the polls. Ed Miliband has made that | :23:29. | :23:35. | |
happen. We have one more councillors, we have been running in | :23:36. | :23:41. | |
by-elections and we have held this government over the barrel over six | :23:42. | :23:44. | |
months on energy prices. That is to do with his leadership. The more | :23:45. | :23:49. | |
that voters save him, the less they seem convinced. In 2011, he had been | :23:50. | :23:57. | |
leader for one year, and only 1 % regarded him as weird, by 2014, that | :23:58. | :24:06. | |
was 41%. Look at that! Look at that weirdness! What people need is to | :24:07. | :24:11. | |
know where the Labour Party stands on fundamental issues. And in those | :24:12. | :24:15. | |
areas, particularly the cost of living and fairness and people being | :24:16. | :24:20. | |
concerned that we are entering into a period where people will be worse | :24:21. | :24:24. | |
for the first time ever at the end of the Parliament, these things are | :24:25. | :24:29. | |
important and Ed Miliband is part of our success. Definitely. I think | :24:30. | :24:37. | |
this is ridiculous, to be fair, he is not a politician that says, I am | :24:38. | :24:42. | |
dying with the Arctic monkeys, I know who is the number one. He did | :24:43. | :24:50. | |
not play that game. -- down. He is not either there to portray himself | :24:51. | :24:55. | |
as someone who was with the children, I know everything about | :24:56. | :24:59. | |
popular culture. His authenticity is the most important thing. People do | :25:00. | :25:03. | |
not think he is authentic, unless they think we were at is authentic. | :25:04. | :25:10. | |
Is it true that his staff applaud him when he comes back after giving | :25:11. | :25:16. | |
even a mediocre speech? I have never heard that. I have never heard about | :25:17. | :25:24. | |
him being applauded. And I am pleased to applaud him with he makes | :25:25. | :25:27. | |
speeches, I have given him a standing ovation. You have to do | :25:28. | :25:31. | |
that because the cameras are rolling! No, he made a good speech. | :25:32. | :25:38. | |
Five minutes without notes. It took a long time to memorise I don't | :25:39. | :25:42. | |
blame him! The cost of living. Focusing on that, it has paid | :25:43. | :25:48. | |
dividends. But inflation is falling and perhaps collapsing, unemployment | :25:49. | :25:52. | |
is falling faster than anybody thought, as we can see. Wages are | :25:53. | :25:59. | |
rising, soon faster than prices Retail sales are booming, people | :26:00. | :26:04. | |
have got money in their pockets Isn't the cost of living crisis | :26:05. | :26:09. | |
narrative running out of steam? I do not think so and I should say that I | :26:10. | :26:15. | |
welcome any sign of positive changes in the economy, if anybody gets a | :26:16. | :26:20. | |
job in Doncaster, I am pleased by the end of this Parliament families | :26:21. | :26:26. | |
will be over ?900 worse off because of tax and benefit changes and the | :26:27. | :26:33. | |
working person is ?1600 worse off and it is the first government since | :26:34. | :26:36. | |
the 1870s where people will be at the end of the Parliament. We | :26:37. | :26:40. | |
believe the government made wrong choices that lead the rich off at | :26:41. | :26:43. | |
the expense of those on middle and lower incomes. -- let the rich. The | :26:44. | :26:52. | |
average family ?794 worse off from tax and benefit changes. That has | :26:53. | :26:57. | |
been backed up. They are those figures. But he has skewed these | :26:58. | :27:02. | |
figures by including the richest, where the fall in tax and the | :27:03. | :27:07. | |
penalty they pay is highest. If you take away the richest, it is nowhere | :27:08. | :27:12. | |
near that figure. Everybody agrees and even the government and | :27:13. | :27:16. | |
knowledges that at the end of their tenure in Parliament, people will be | :27:17. | :27:23. | |
worse off. 350,000 extra people who would desperately like full-time | :27:24. | :27:27. | |
work who are working part-time and 1 million young people unemployed and | :27:28. | :27:30. | |
the reason the cost of living has a residence is people feel that. I was | :27:31. | :27:36. | |
in a supermarket and at Doncaster and someone summed this up, he said | :27:37. | :27:40. | |
I work hard and at the end of the week, beyond paying bills, I have | :27:41. | :27:45. | |
got nothing else. If you take away the top 10% who are losing over | :27:46. | :27:53. | |
?600,000, the average loss comes down to around ?400, less than half | :27:54. | :28:00. | |
of what you claim. That figure is totally misleading. These are the | :28:01. | :28:06. | |
figures from the IFS. It still shows... Whatever way you shape | :28:07. | :28:13. | |
this, people will still be worse off, families worse off because of | :28:14. | :28:16. | |
these changes to tax and benefits and working people because wages | :28:17. | :28:22. | |
have not kept up with prices. Your energy portfolio, you back the | :28:23. | :28:27. | |
enquiry into the big six companies and you intend to go ahead with the | :28:28. | :28:31. | |
price freeze and reconfigure the market even before it reports. If | :28:32. | :28:37. | |
you win, this is a waste of time? Whilst we have had this process | :28:38. | :28:40. | |
before the announcement, we always feel if it goes that way, there | :28:41. | :28:45. | |
might be areas we have not thought of that the enquiry will also draw | :28:46. | :28:48. | |
attention to that we might want to add on. You are right, our basic | :28:49. | :28:53. | |
reforms for the new regulator, to separate generation supply, we will | :28:54. | :28:59. | |
pursue that. What happens if this report concludes that your plans are | :29:00. | :29:03. | |
not correct? You will still go ahead? I don't think so. Actually, | :29:04. | :29:08. | |
if you look at the report that Ofgem produced, some of the issues Labour | :29:09. | :29:12. | |
has been drawing attention to like vertical integration, they cover | :29:13. | :29:17. | |
that. I was asking about the Competition Commission? The report | :29:18. | :29:23. | |
last week is a result of working together and I think it is clearly | :29:24. | :29:30. | |
accepted in this sector, look at SSE last week, they will separate the | :29:31. | :29:34. | |
business. We are pushing at the open door. It has already pulled out of | :29:35. | :29:54. | |
gas. So it follows if you freeze energy prices across the market it | :29:55. | :29:58. | |
might be the right thing to do but there will be a cost in terms of | :29:59. | :30:01. | |
jobs and investment, correct? Well, I met with SSE last weekand the | :30:02. | :30:05. | |
chief executive and talked about these issues. The jobs changes are | :30:06. | :30:10. | |
partly about them looking at how they could be more efficient as a | :30:11. | :30:13. | |
company. On offshore wind that wasn't really to do with the price | :30:14. | :30:17. | |
freeze. That was more to do with issues around confidence in that | :30:18. | :30:19. | |
area and therefore willing to put the money into it, as well as | :30:20. | :30:25. | |
technical issues as well But there'll be job losses. Is that a | :30:26. | :30:31. | |
price worth paying? We believe the reason we are having a price freeze | :30:32. | :30:35. | |
is these companies have been overcharging customers and haven't | :30:36. | :30:38. | |
been investing in their organisations and making them more | :30:39. | :30:42. | |
efficient. I do not believe a price freeze is linked to job losses. | :30:43. | :30:46. | |
These companies do need to be more efficient. Goal for all of us is | :30:47. | :30:50. | |
realising the fantastic opportunity for more jobs and growth from an | :30:51. | :30:54. | |
energy sector that has certainty going forward. That's what Labour | :30:55. | :30:58. | |
will deliver. Caroline Flint, thank you. | :30:59. | :31:00. | |
It's 1130 and you're watching The Sunday Politics. We say goodbye to | :31:01. | :31:04. | |
viewers in Scotland, who leave us now for Sunday Politics Scotland. | :31:05. | :31:05. | |
Coming up here evidence driven policy. I think it | :31:06. | :31:15. | |
is Molly. survey suggests that our future is N | :31:16. | :31:37. | |
Rather than out of Europe. @nd we are knocking to families affected by | :31:38. | :31:41. | |
immigration policy. We are `sking if their government is right to blunt | :31:42. | :31:52. | |
cupids arrow. We hope are two guests will bring some fresh era to our | :31:53. | :31:58. | |
studio after a week of last. Steven Croft from UKIP and Darren Jones, | :31:59. | :32:05. | |
Labour candidate for North West Bristol. We start with the | :32:06. | :32:13. | |
governments attempts to standardise cigarette packaging. Where do you | :32:14. | :32:21. | |
stand on this? I like to go with evidence driven policy whendver | :32:22. | :32:32. | |
possible. There is evidence this will reduce the number of children | :32:33. | :32:43. | |
taking up smoking. Even thehr health of the tobacco industry in Bristol | :32:44. | :32:49. | |
would be overridden. I would rather less children in Bristol took up | :32:50. | :32:54. | |
smoking every year. We need to protect jobs in Bristol and across | :32:55. | :32:59. | |
the country but you need to get the balance. Has UKIP got a polhcy on | :33:00. | :33:15. | |
this? We tend to be opposed to the nanny state in all its forms, but as | :33:16. | :33:24. | |
an ex`smoker I do not think this will harm anybody. Anything that | :33:25. | :33:30. | |
discourages children from t`king up smoking must be good. Peopld who | :33:31. | :33:37. | |
smoke make their decisions on what they smoke at an early age `nd stay | :33:38. | :33:44. | |
loyal. People do not see thd smoke these because they have a lovely | :33:45. | :33:53. | |
locks. It will not harm anybody The debate over leaving Europe came to | :33:54. | :33:58. | |
life this week with a showdown between Nick Clegg and Nigel | :33:59. | :34:01. | |
Farage. Much was made of how our economy with the affected. Today | :34:02. | :34:08. | |
this programme can reveal the results of a survey of firms in the | :34:09. | :34:16. | |
region. First are business correspondent has been lookhng at | :34:17. | :34:18. | |
the numbers. Either you shouldn't. Busindss does | :34:19. | :34:24. | |
not get more international than less. We have got clients from | :34:25. | :34:45. | |
Australia to the United States. 100 people work here writing colputer | :34:46. | :34:51. | |
programmes and safety manuals. It is a huge international trade. The sort | :34:52. | :34:55. | |
of people you would expect to be fully committed to staying hn | :34:56. | :34:59. | |
Europe. I would tick the box for out. The EU is a particular block | :35:00. | :35:13. | |
for this man. People are given a fright in to see if they can out of | :35:14. | :35:19. | |
the EU they cannot do international business. That is rubbish. How many | :35:20. | :35:24. | |
other companies think it is time to leave the EU? Not as many as you | :35:25. | :35:30. | |
might think. Then our survex just 18% were for. Just. That will come | :35:31. | :35:43. | |
as something of a relief to Euro enthusiasts like the Lib Dels. There | :35:44. | :35:55. | |
is a rescue. It is like the debates between Scotland and the rest of the | :35:56. | :36:02. | |
UK. It is a leak of faith. The market remains largely open. You are | :36:03. | :36:08. | |
part of the single market btt have no see over the rules. He whll find | :36:09. | :36:15. | |
support in this industrial dstate. This high`tech firm is worrhed about | :36:16. | :36:21. | |
leaving the EU. We would be worse off. I remember when we used to have | :36:22. | :36:27. | |
huge amounts of documenting processes to get anything exported, | :36:28. | :36:31. | |
where as now it is very simple. They sell all over Europe. This bottle | :36:32. | :36:36. | |
will end up in Greece. This study is destined for Slovenia. Therd are | :36:37. | :36:41. | |
hundreds of companies selling across Europe. Then the survey we | :36:42. | :36:46. | |
discovered that 50% think wd are better then the EU. Do they love | :36:47. | :36:52. | |
Brussels? No. Why not? Becatse of this stuff. It is the oldest | :36:53. | :37:00. | |
complaint in the book and the most common in the survey. Red t`pe they | :37:01. | :37:06. | |
is stifling trade. Although all of our ingredidnts are | :37:07. | :37:12. | |
completely safe we now have two really registered the entird | :37:13. | :37:15. | |
products. It is just the sale ingredients that we have to do a lot | :37:16. | :37:19. | |
more proving. How much will it cost you? This will cost ?250,000 that is | :37:20. | :37:26. | |
a huge amount of money that it is something we have to do. So you back | :37:27. | :37:32. | |
the EU but you do not love this red tape. I wish they would takd more | :37:33. | :37:37. | |
notice of the problems that we suffer a wife and the kind of | :37:38. | :37:40. | |
efforts that we have to go through to meet all these wonderful | :37:41. | :37:46. | |
regulations. No love for Brtssels from business. Instead a rather | :37:47. | :37:51. | |
grudging better in than out. He to digests the figures from this | :37:52. | :37:55. | |
survey is Stephen Robertson on the chairman of business West. What did | :37:56. | :38:02. | |
you make of the findings? What we found was that about 50% of the | :38:03. | :38:08. | |
respondents big and small btsinesses said that on balance they w`nted to | :38:09. | :38:14. | |
stay in the EU. Slightly fewer than 20% said they would be bettdr off if | :38:15. | :38:21. | |
we left. Even that 50% who wanted to stay and were far from happx with | :38:22. | :38:27. | |
everything about Brussels and they had criticisms as your piecd brought | :38:28. | :38:36. | |
to life. Red tape. Waste. Possibly seeing that we need change puickly. | :38:37. | :38:41. | |
All these firms that were asked did they have a stake in Europe? They | :38:42. | :38:48. | |
were a mixture of big and slall and a mixture of exporters, | :38:49. | :38:53. | |
manufacturers, as well as pdople did not export. A whole cross`sdction. | :38:54. | :38:57. | |
Was there any point in asking people who did not export? There is a world | :38:58. | :39:05. | |
be on Europe as well. Steve Crowther, does this law a whole | :39:06. | :39:14. | |
under the water line for yot? I was very encouraged by the pack`ge. The | :39:15. | :39:21. | |
point was made clearly. Gentleman that makes insect repellent said on | :39:22. | :39:28. | |
balance he was like to be in because he remembered all the paperwork | :39:29. | :39:33. | |
Later in the package she is having to rip up the paperwork and spends | :39:34. | :39:44. | |
?250,000 making a new requirements. Vince Cable illuminated this. He | :39:45. | :39:48. | |
says there is a risk. Busindsses are being taught that as a rest. You do | :39:49. | :39:54. | |
not think it is a rest. I do not think there is a risk. Digbx Jones | :39:55. | :39:59. | |
said last year and 24 hours of the UK was withdrawing from the European | :40:00. | :40:03. | |
Union it would have all the trade agreement it needs. Is Labotr going | :40:04. | :40:12. | |
to come out battling for thd EU I was pleased to see this report | :40:13. | :40:15. | |
because it reflects Labour Party policy. We just have to be sensible | :40:16. | :40:25. | |
about this. We cannot resort to the rhetoric that we have seen of the | :40:26. | :40:28. | |
last weeks. This is about pdople 's likelihoods. You are clearlx in and | :40:29. | :40:38. | |
no referendum? If there is ` major transfer of power to Brussels | :40:39. | :40:42. | |
British people will have thd right to see. People are not happx with | :40:43. | :40:49. | |
the EU at the moment. The kdy point here. You look at the Conservative | :40:50. | :40:54. | |
policy that says they will negotiate and have a referendum in 2007. We | :40:55. | :40:59. | |
have said we are for reform in Europe but it has to be a strong | :41:00. | :41:04. | |
button in Europe. Let us go back to the business point of view. Our | :41:05. | :41:08. | |
company is out of step with general public opinion? What businesses are | :41:09. | :41:15. | |
seeing is that this level of uncertainty is hurting us and we | :41:16. | :41:19. | |
need to set this issue quickly. Businesses are looking at the issue | :41:20. | :41:23. | |
from the point of view of m`king sure that bottom line is intuitive | :41:24. | :41:28. | |
from the difficulties. As wd have seen in the debates recentlx the | :41:29. | :41:32. | |
debate is far reaching. I do not think the business element of the | :41:33. | :41:38. | |
debate is either intrusive dnough or secondly I do not think we `re | :41:39. | :41:42. | |
getting firm information from government, from other political | :41:43. | :41:45. | |
parties, to tell us what can be done. Could we have free tr`de | :41:46. | :41:50. | |
agreements and 24 hours? Th`t sounds an extraordinary claim. Digby Jones | :41:51. | :41:57. | |
said it. He used to be head of the CPI. He ought to know what he's | :41:58. | :42:02. | |
talking about. A couple of weeks ago I met a commissioner in Str`sbourg | :42:03. | :42:08. | |
and had an off the record anything. He was under no illusion thdy would | :42:09. | :42:15. | |
play hardball potentials to me. Why cut off their nose to spite your | :42:16. | :42:22. | |
face? We are the biggest export markets. Business does not work like | :42:23. | :42:28. | |
that. That does not how bushness works. Look how long it is taking | :42:29. | :42:33. | |
the EU to set up featuring agreements. It is lagging bdhind | :42:34. | :42:42. | |
Switzerland. We have to press on. What price love? If you want to | :42:43. | :42:47. | |
bring a loved one year from outside Europe the answer is just over | :42:48. | :42:51. | |
?18,000 per year that is wh`t you need to Aaron to make sure xour | :42:52. | :42:55. | |
partner qualifies for a Vis` to come and work with you. `` that hs the | :42:56. | :43:03. | |
salary you need to achieve to make sure your partner qualifies for a | :43:04. | :43:09. | |
Visa. What happens when you fall hn love | :43:10. | :43:13. | |
with someone who has not allowed to live in the UK. That happens to Andy | :43:14. | :43:24. | |
and Molly Russell from Bath. British citizens have to earn ?18,600 to | :43:25. | :43:28. | |
bring their partners you thdy are not from Europe. At the timd and | :43:29. | :43:33. | |
they did not. It meant Mollx had to work in China. They made thhs video | :43:34. | :43:41. | |
to show what it was like. I would come home every evening to | :43:42. | :43:48. | |
the realisation that my wifd is thousands of miles away on her own. | :43:49. | :43:55. | |
The boys were without both their mum and dad. They took it very `ctually. | :43:56. | :44:01. | |
What sort of man cannot keep this family together? But their love | :44:02. | :44:08. | |
story does have happy ending. Andy now has a job paying over the | :44:09. | :44:12. | |
threshold and Molly is a job paying over the threshold and Mollx is | :44:13. | :44:15. | |
allowed to live with her in that system think the policy is cynical. | :44:16. | :44:26. | |
To win votes they are giving the British public what they thhnk the | :44:27. | :44:29. | |
British public want. The newspapers tell us that immigration is a | :44:30. | :44:36. | |
problem. Even one of my colleagues said there is no space. It hs hard | :44:37. | :44:43. | |
to keep a relationship going when you can only communicate online I | :44:44. | :44:47. | |
have spoken to several families in the West to have had to do that | :44:48. | :44:51. | |
That the government says thd new rules are effective in helphng to | :44:52. | :44:55. | |
keep down emigration. The Home Office did not want to be | :44:56. | :44:58. | |
interviewed about these new rules come through because they are | :44:59. | :45:01. | |
currently subject to a legal challenge. That they said: | :45:02. | :45:23. | |
strictly, even to those who have served their country. This lan was | :45:24. | :45:29. | |
born in South Africa but is now British and has been living in | :45:30. | :45:34. | |
Swindon. He served in the British Army for ten years. He did Jews of | :45:35. | :45:38. | |
Afghanistan and Iraq. After being made redundant they had been earning | :45:39. | :45:46. | |
below the threshold. `` the served in Afghanistan and Iraq. Thdy are | :45:47. | :45:56. | |
what drives me. It is a sad situation. It is emotionallx | :45:57. | :46:05. | |
breaking me. I feel so let down It is Conservative Party policx to | :46:06. | :46:09. | |
reduce net migration to the UK to the tens of thousands. Latest | :46:10. | :46:13. | |
figures show emigration rishng. The High Court does decide the new | :46:14. | :46:16. | |
income rules are too strict form the eating that come at harder. | :46:17. | :46:22. | |
Steve Carell you would need a heart of stone to keep a family apart | :46:23. | :46:34. | |
These are sad stories. One of the issues that we see here is that the | :46:35. | :46:37. | |
government is trying to control immigration, but it has both hands | :46:38. | :46:44. | |
tied behind its back. We have open door freedom of movement to all of | :46:45. | :46:49. | |
the citizens of the European Union. All of the difference it can make | :46:50. | :46:53. | |
has to be for Bristol peopld from outside the European Union. If you | :46:54. | :46:58. | |
get when and where can out of Europe then presumably those same | :46:59. | :47:01. | |
restrictions on partners coling would apply if you met someone on an | :47:02. | :47:06. | |
EU country. So if you met someone in France they could not come back and | :47:07. | :47:11. | |
live in England. They would be rules. Of course there would be | :47:12. | :47:18. | |
rules. You could not marry ` new European and bring them back to work | :47:19. | :47:23. | |
in England. I am not saying that. That is the logic. That is not the | :47:24. | :47:27. | |
logic. We need to control immigration and a complex and | :47:28. | :47:34. | |
sensible set of rules that dnable us to simply control the quality and | :47:35. | :47:37. | |
the quantity of people that come to the country. That is how we will | :47:38. | :47:40. | |
manage to maintain public sdrvices. At the moment you cannot brhng | :47:41. | :47:46. | |
somebody back from China. Would that be the scene a few met somebody in | :47:47. | :47:53. | |
Paris or Rome? If we had left the EU? The rules would be the same | :47:54. | :47:57. | |
across the world. That is the point. At the moment we are constantly | :47:58. | :48:00. | |
trying to manipulate statistics over a narrow band of people. With Labour | :48:01. | :48:07. | |
dry to change this? What is this shows is that the Tory government is | :48:08. | :48:17. | |
heartless. The High Court h`s shown a sensible approach to this case by | :48:18. | :48:24. | |
seeing that the level at whhch. . You would relax the rules and drop | :48:25. | :48:29. | |
the ?18,000 threshold. The position in the Labour Party is we agree that | :48:30. | :48:32. | |
taxpayers should not have to take the hit. You see the Tories are | :48:33. | :48:38. | |
being heartless that you will not commit to changing the rules. Let me | :48:39. | :48:43. | |
answer the question. I quickly with the concept. It is the level that I | :48:44. | :48:52. | |
disagree. ?18,000 is too high. The High Court said a similar thing | :48:53. | :48:56. | |
Maybe relieved to look at mhnimum weight level. `` maybe we nded to | :48:57. | :49:07. | |
look at a minimum wage level. Do you accept that petition patients has | :49:08. | :49:13. | |
worn thin because Labour did not have any control over the Borders at | :49:14. | :49:20. | |
all. Ed Miliband has apologhsed because we should have done more. We | :49:21. | :49:33. | |
have to leave it there. The CRB is a long time in politics. He is our | :49:34. | :49:41. | |
rundown in 60 seconds. `` the sea hour week is a long | :49:42. | :49:44. | |
time. Opponents to the policy of killing | :49:45. | :49:49. | |
badgers welcomed the decision to delay the roll out more cal zones. A | :49:50. | :49:57. | |
study concluded that so far the culling had not been effecthve. That | :49:58. | :50:00. | |
has not deterred the farming Minister. We want to focus the | :50:01. | :50:06. | |
improvement on the cal is that we have started and make sure we get | :50:07. | :50:10. | |
the process right before rolling it out further. The Prime Minister was | :50:11. | :50:14. | |
back on the Somerset levels. David Cameron came to see the | :50:15. | :50:19. | |
dredging work he had ordered. It is going to be a continuous process. It | :50:20. | :50:25. | |
is a 20 year plan. To cash`strapped councils receive money to hdlp them | :50:26. | :50:31. | |
merits. Pubs and clubs in Cheltenhal have a | :50:32. | :50:35. | |
new tab to settle. This is only the second place in the country to bring | :50:36. | :50:40. | |
in a late`night levy. The money raised will help to pay for the | :50:41. | :50:45. | |
clean`up. Another busy week. That is `ll we | :50:46. | :50:52. | |
have time for this week. Banksy Steve Crowther and Darren Jones | :50:53. | :50:58. | |
taking part. `` thank you to Steve Crowther. | :50:59. | :51:06. | |
You can keep track of what we're up to on Twitter. We are back | :51:07. | :51:08. | |
chair next week. And with that, back to Andrew. Welcome back and time now | :51:09. | :51:22. | |
to get more from our panel. So they can justify their meagre patents. | :51:23. | :51:29. | |
This cost of living mantra will last all the way until the election. | :51:30. | :51:33. | |
Cannot? Ed Miliband leaves he is onto something and for most of this | :51:34. | :51:37. | |
Parliament, inflation has outstripped wages. That is going to | :51:38. | :51:43. | |
go the other way and wages will rise, to which you say Ed Miliband | :51:44. | :51:49. | |
has nothing to say. He says if you think people are going to feel | :51:50. | :51:53. | |
better in the blink of an eye, you are a Conservative and do not | :51:54. | :51:56. | |
understand the depth of this and he is taking the message from a | :51:57. | :52:00. | |
presidential election in America in 2012 and make Romney was ahead on | :52:01. | :52:06. | |
some of the economic indicators but Barack Obama was ahead on the key | :52:07. | :52:10. | |
one, do you believe this candidate will make your family's life | :52:11. | :52:14. | |
better? The message that Ed Miliband will try to say is the next election | :52:15. | :52:21. | |
is about whose side are you on? And he believes Labour will be on the | :52:22. | :52:23. | |
side of more voters than conservatives. It would be crazy for | :52:24. | :52:28. | |
Labour not to talk about the cost of living because even if wages exceed | :52:29. | :52:33. | |
inflation next year, it is not as if voters will walk around feeling like | :52:34. | :52:37. | |
Imelda Marcos, they will still feel as if they were struggling and not | :52:38. | :52:43. | |
just compared... Retail sales are slowing? That is not the sign of | :52:44. | :52:50. | |
palpable disparity. Circumstances are better than three years ago but | :52:51. | :52:56. | |
not better than five years ago. The Reagan question will still be | :52:57. | :53:00. | |
employed, are you better off than at the last election? But things in | :53:01. | :53:05. | |
America were actually getting worse when he asked that. I covered that | :53:06. | :53:11. | |
election, that is why it resonated and they did get worse. The | :53:12. | :53:15. | |
Ayatollah had quadrupled the price of oil. This is based on things | :53:16. | :53:21. | |
getting relatively better, after a very long wait, so the cost of | :53:22. | :53:27. | |
living critique will have to adapt? It will but it gets out of a very | :53:28. | :53:33. | |
sticky spot and the IFS says wages will not outstrip inflation and by | :53:34. | :53:37. | |
that time they can start talking about other things, plans for the | :53:38. | :53:41. | |
railways and tuition fees and at the moment, everything is up for grabs. | :53:42. | :53:45. | |
Labour know that every time they talk about something they want to | :53:46. | :53:49. | |
do, the question is, how do you pay for it? They can talk about the | :53:50. | :53:53. | |
economy and they don't have substantial things to say. Is it | :53:54. | :53:57. | |
true that Mr Iain Duncan Smith was going to make a major announcement | :53:58. | :54:03. | |
on benefit cheats? Or something to do with that this morning? But he | :54:04. | :54:08. | |
decided against it because of the tobacco over Maria Miller? It would | :54:09. | :54:12. | |
be very odd to go on to The Andrew Marr Show to have a chat and see | :54:13. | :54:17. | |
what he is having for lunch. Patrick went from the Guardian said he was | :54:18. | :54:20. | |
going to set out higher financial penalty phase for providing | :54:21. | :54:25. | |
inaccurate information in claims. This is a bad day to do that, given | :54:26. | :54:31. | |
that MP expenses are treated far more lenient the than any one from | :54:32. | :54:37. | |
Joe public. That would be fascinating, if true. And he is | :54:38. | :54:42. | |
making a very big speech on well for tomorrow and this tweet from Patrick | :54:43. | :54:47. | |
went at the Guardian, he has proper sized on welfare matters and he | :54:48. | :54:51. | |
tends to know what is going on. But it would be deeply unfortunate if | :54:52. | :54:56. | |
that was the message today. How can he make a speech that has anything | :54:57. | :54:59. | |
about cracking down on benefit claimants? Not today but I am not | :55:00. | :55:05. | |
sure tomorrow. Do you get the impression that nobody in both main | :55:06. | :55:12. | |
parties is very confident of winning in 2015? I column last week said the | :55:13. | :55:16. | |
result, the most likely result from one year on is another hung | :55:17. | :55:21. | |
parliament and which government results from that depends on the | :55:22. | :55:26. | |
mathematical specifics of whether the Tories can do a deal as well as | :55:27. | :55:29. | |
Labour, leaving everything in the hands of Nick Clegg or whether one | :55:30. | :55:33. | |
party can do a straightforward deal but I do not detect any sense of | :55:34. | :55:38. | |
exuberance or confidence in either camp. And the Tories are still | :55:39. | :55:44. | |
shooting themselves over losing the boundary commission reforms because | :55:45. | :55:47. | |
that was going to net them 20 seats and they lost that because they | :55:48. | :55:51. | |
messed up the House of Lords reform and there are still furious with | :55:52. | :55:54. | |
themselves. The former US President, George W Bush, has been a busy boy | :55:55. | :55:58. | |
and here at the Sunday Politics we thought you'd like to see the | :55:59. | :56:02. | |
results of his artistic endeavours. Time for the gallery. | :56:03. | :56:06. | |
I was a prize to find myself saying, some of these are not bad! -- | :56:07. | :56:54. | |
surprised. Vladimir Putin? I like the one of Tony Blair but his early | :56:55. | :57:01. | |
ones of dogs, to be in the presence of the master is to see his portrait | :57:02. | :57:07. | |
of a Joanne Love. He is not of the Turner prize but I was surprised. He | :57:08. | :57:12. | |
gets the mask of Vladimir Putin also Tony Blair. I was impressed | :57:13. | :57:18. | |
that he did not allow personal or political grudges to influence his | :57:19. | :57:22. | |
artwork. Jacques Chirac, he comes out of this incredibly well! And | :57:23. | :57:27. | |
Angela Merkel comes out astonishingly well. Quite generous | :57:28. | :57:33. | |
as well. Tony Blair is the best one and the reason is he had the closest | :57:34. | :57:38. | |
relationship with them and he has talked about this portrait, saying | :57:39. | :57:42. | |
he was quite fond of him and you can see that. These are awful, they | :57:43. | :57:47. | |
would not get you an A-level but you must admire him to have the guts to | :57:48. | :57:54. | |
do this, and display them publicly! An A-level? Just doing joined up | :57:55. | :58:00. | |
numbers gets you that these days! What do you do when you retire? This | :58:01. | :58:05. | |
is less embarrassing than some of the other things people have done. | :58:06. | :58:09. | |
As good as Churchill? I don't know... No! Churchill was brilliant! | :58:10. | :58:17. | |
And on that! That's all for today. Tune into BBC Two every day at | :58:18. | :58:20. | |
lunchtime this week for the Daily Politics. And we'll be back at the | :58:21. | :58:24. | |
later time of 2:30pm next Sunday after the London Marathon. Remember, | :58:25. | :58:27. | |
if it's Sunday, it's the Sunday Politics. | :58:28. | :59:55. | |
International teams searching for the missing Malaysian airliner are | :59:56. | :59:58. | |
investigating three electronic signals received in the southern | :59:59. | :00:04. | |
Indian Ocean. It's thought | :00:05. | :00:05. |