18/04/2014 The Papers

business end of the season and Ramberg will join the Wolves in the

Premier League. More after the papers.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

bringing us tomorrow. With me are the broadcaster Shyama Perera and

freelance Parliamentary Correspondent Rob Merrick. There

will be no mention of swimming trunks this time. Tomorrow's front

pages, starting with... In an interview with the Independent, the

Government's Surveillance Commissioner has warned roadside

cameras are threatening our privacy. The Mail reports allegations that

British Gas have paid staff bonuses to inflate customers' bills. The

Mirror says one of the men convicted over the killing of a young boy in

Liverpool in 2007 has been released from prison. The Archbishop of

Canterbury tells the Telegraph about his anguish over the Church of

England's position on gay marriage. The Express says pensioners are

taking out equity from their homes to make ends meet. The FT says the

world's largest asset manager is preparing to launch new pension

products in the UK in the light of changes announced in the Budget. The

Guardian says the personal financial data of millions of people could be

sold under plans being drawn up by Revenue and Customs. And the Times

says a document has emerged which undermines claims by a group of

Iraqis that they were ill`treated by British soldiers a decade ago. And

that is the story we will start with. The scandal of Rikishi troops

left to face a murder lies. A secret papers shows that at users were

militants. This was a group of Iraqis that have claimed they were

mistreated and they got quite a bit of legal aid to fight the case. The

inquiry is still ongoing I believe. It is already cost ?23 million. What

I don't quite get is whether or not, ultimately, it is a bad thing

that this went ahead or in a strange way, even if they cheated to get

their weight into legal aid, it might not be entirely clear in

this. What has been worth the money? The company that represents the

Iraqis shredded the original English translation of a document which

showed that the defendants were members of a paramilitary. That was

the day before the inquiry was due to begin. This document was not

shown when legal aid was applied for and if it had been, they would not

have got legal aid. That in itself is a vital part of this story. What

I am not entirely sure of when reading this is whether that

undermines what did then came out of the inquiry. The article goes on to

say as well that if this is true, that the soldiers had been put under

incredibly close scrutiny and it has gone on for years, that is part of

this outrage. And yes it is. In 2007 the detainees and their families

were refused judicial review and it has been seven years since that

decision was taken. As you say, what the story says is that the case

would not have gone ahead because he would not have got legal aid. It is

a very strong headline. But whether that means that anyone set out at

the start who says that the murders took lays, or whether it was

established during the case, that is something different isn't it? The

issue is mistreatment and that is still ongoing and we know of other

cases where it has been true. Regardless, most people would say it

was clearly wrong that the case went ahead and that it was a war and

these were people fighting in horrific circumstances with terrible

injuries done. I am certain this will have repercussions. The law

firms at the centre of it still have 2000 additional claims against the

administration for unlawful killings and you wonder what the impact of

those will be. Yes, you wonder whether they will have any merit

(all. The argument here `` at all. The argument is that the soldiers

were put through the rigors of an inquiry that they should not have

had to face. Yes, some MPs are calling for investigation. Clearly

this needs to happen. These two firms did not show a piece of paper

that was absolutely vital. We have had Nigel Evans talking about the

cost of defending himself, and issues around legal aid because

there are people who cannot get it when they most needed, the idea that

?23 million has been spent on two law firms `` from, misleading the

fact that the case, it brings the whole thing under scrutiny. Are the

wrong people getting money? Now to the interview with the Archbishop of

Canterbury. Concentrating on the difficulty that gay marriage, now

that it has been legalized, poses for the church. You have much

sympathy for the church about Rob ``, Rob, since people of the same

sex can now be married? I do have sympathy for people trying to see

the issue through religious eyes. For people who have grown up

believing that it is a religious institution, it is hard to look at

it a different way. The Archbishop is one of those people. He spoke out

against gay marriage and was taken aback by the hostility around him

when he did it. He is now in a position of accepting it and I

imagine that is what more and more people will do. They might think

that the whole issue is done and dusted. But for the Church of

England it is an ongoing issue. He talks about his almost impossible

task of reconciling the views of riches church `goers with those in

Africa for example. I read that the Church of England is conducting

lesson type services which would feel like gay marriage happening in

church, so it is still an ongoing issue. The law changes, but

attitudes take a while to catch up, don't they? The trouble is if you

truly believe something is wrong, it is very difficult even when you have

been told that the current thinking is that it is not the case, it is

very difficult to just change your views simply because the rest of the

country thinks you should. I stay out of church issues. I am a

Buddhist and I remember an archbishop a number of years ago,

who I was sent to talk with. I didn't know that they all were

different colours so I went up to one and said, " Archbishop can I

talk to you? " and it was the wrong one. So I stay out of this. I am

always slightly anxious about people bowing down to a higher force that I

cannot see. But he has got to navigate this hasn't he? He is the

head of the Anglican Church as well and as Rob was saying among other

parts of the word tend to, how can I say it, leg behind? It is a

difference of opinion though, isn't it? It is not just a difference of

opinion. There are brutal actions being taken out over the world that

are covered up by the Church of England and the Archbishop is quite

right to be juxtaposing what is right against what can actually be

done and it is a Catch`22. To me, there is a simple solution, but

obviously you cannot take it. As the head of the church though, he can

say that the abuse gay people have suffered is an acceptable without

agreeing with gay marriage can't he? You can stand up for one thing

without caving in over everything. But this country is accepting gay

marriage to a greater degree. The Archbishop probably strikes people

as one of life great optimist `` like's. Let's move on. The moment

the ferry captain abandoned the ship. This is the ferry that sank in

North Korea earlier this week `` South Korea. Many still not

accounted for and we know of at least 20 who have died. The death

toll is likely to rise and now we know that officers and the captain

have been formally arrested. This is the last thing you ever expect of a

captain who is supposed to be the last one off the ship. It is an

extraordinary photograph. It is so clear and it looks to the naked eye

as if there is still time for him to go back and help people come out as

a large part of the ship is out of the water. It reminds one of the

Costa Concordia when that happened. The captain also instantly jumped

ship. Perhaps we have watched Titanic one too many times, but you

are expected to do everything you can to save everyone on board. I

thought that was what made you a captain not just that you can steer.

It appears there were catastrophic errors while he was still on the

ship, many of the children told to stay below deck when they could have

done more to survive. The story had it all, in terms of his behaviour.

We were amazed how little coverage this has gotten today. It is quite

difficult to see as this is quite a small picture, perhaps it should

have had greater prominence. It is all very interesting with the

Malaysian plane going down, the focus on that part of the world

around disasters, it is so interesting and will be interesting

to see how they are all managed afterwards. Moving on. Anonymous

financial details cannot be bought by different firms. What uses this

data, do you know? I would imagine it is of great use to credit rating

companies and advertisers who are able to look in either Norma's

detail at this. They can make money off of this. I suppose when most

people look at these companies, the realise that they do not have golden

records when it comes to people 's data particularly HMRC. I think

people might also remember this is on the back of the GP records being

sold off in a similar way. But there were health benefits their, ``

there. But if there are clear benefits in that case, where are the

benefits here? He looked to be eerily financial. HMRC, like all

public bodies, has had to make huge cutbacks in recent years. We have no

choice to give in the matter do we? You can look in one area and see

that there are more pensioners with too little in their pots, I am not

sure how it works or what they use it for. It may be used to help with

social support. We don't know but we don't want to take the risk. I think

that is basically what is being said. To suggest that they can

practice price dissemination, I don't know how they can do that if

it is all anonymous. I need an accountant to explain. This is a man

who is accused of conning his way around the London Marathon. He was

boasting about the time in which he had done it. I do not know how it

works. I'm told that on some parts of the London Marathon route, you

double back. I suppose he could have climbed over a couple of barriers. I

just think... It's a terrible thing to say but I think it's a very funny

story. Do you? He got a medal for it. Do you think it is funny? It is

hilarious! He allegedly ran the second half of the marathon faster

than Mo Farah. He was uncovered by a man who looks into everything like

this. And he was not the only person to have done this. He has written,

with a second`half like that, you must work on your first half pacing.

The fact that he could go around in two hours and hold the world

record... One of my friends did it in three hours and that seems

unfeasibly fast. Perhaps I should get in contact with this man and see

if he can check up on my friend. Do you think he realised there were

markers where you are literally clocked? Does he care? I know I

could probably walk it faster than I could run it, and that is not

happening any time soon. Thank you for joining us this evening. I will

be back at midnight with the news. Next, Sportsday.

Hello and welcome to Sportsday. I'm Katherine Downes. A