13/05/2014 The Papers

excluded from the French party. A possible return for Freddie and an

update on the Joe Root Italia. `` G Road Italia.

Welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us

tomorrow. With me Liam Halligan and Hugo Rifkind. Let us look at the

front pages. The EU court ruling that means Google could have to

delete search results which might upset or embarrass anyone with the

so`called right to be forgotten. A little understood tax policy that

means half a million middle`class professionals are paying income tax

of 60%. More on the attempted takeover of

Astra Zeneca by Pfizer. Why was Internet predator not

jailed, asks the Daily Mail. The case of a 34`year`old man who was

that of a child sex charges, but only given a three`year

rehabilitation order. Allegations by a former deputy

leader that MEPs are made to donate large sums.

A secret five`month battle with lung cancer.

We are going to start with the Independent. UK troops could face

war crimes trial. We are a long way off that. But this is the beginning

of something that could be extremely embarrassing. This is potentially a

serious story. It is hard to know which direction

it is going to go. What is not clear at is whether this is the first

evidence of whether we are seeing something terrible happening in this

country or evidence of Britain being a country that co`operates fully on

the basis of quite sketchy allegations. It is impossible to say

which one of those is true. It is a sign of the fact that we are signed

up to the International Criminal Court. We are part of its

jurisdiction, America is not. It is a sign that we are open, a country

that is willing to abide by the rule of law. The ICC and the Hague is

saying allegedly that there were 60 unlawful killings and the hundred 70

mistreatment of prisoners. `` 170. The government has a carefully

calibrated response. On the one hand we will corporate with the ICC, but

it was also said that the government rejects the allegations of systemic

abuse, crucial word they, systemic. They also think the incident is

being referred to, they have been conned brands of the investigated.

This is going to be a slow burn story. The early indications are

that even the preliminary hearings will take several years. This is

kind to be operating just below the news radar for a long time to come.

`` going. Some potentially pretty serious revelations. What the public

needs to understand with this possible case is that the allegation

is that this was organised, this was systematic. Senior military and

political figures are named. It is the suggestion that whatever was

happening went to the top. There were policies directing the army. We

have got to remember that a lot of this evidence is coming from the

armies and records. The British Army is a relatively easy army to

investigate. You are going to be in trouble investigating the Iraq army.

It studies its own misdeeds, it investigates its own misdeeds, there

is a body of evidence. We have to wait and see which way it will go.

Going on to the Financial Times. A blow to US Internet companies. This

is the whole issue of the right to be forgotten if you have things up

on the Internet. This is a ruling by the court of justice. You will get

some people say that it is a blow for free expression and freedom of

the press. On the other hand, on the other side of the argument

intermediaries and media companies that publish stuff on the Internet

may have to be responsible for the veracity of what they publish. This

is an implication that in many ways is almost old`fashioned and

anachronistic. It is trying to regulate the Internet by

jurisdiction. It is almost impossible. What if you are someone

who has a personal record and it is up there. Can you apply to have it

completely wiped? You can, provided people are going to search in the

right way. I have been thinking this over. Before I was in camp, then I

was the other. The EU can only have jurisdiction over Google .co .uk. Go

to Google .com and you are using the American site. It is part of press

regulation. The idea that we can pass laws in this country that limit

what people can see on the Internet without being incredibly

authoritarian. The point of the Internet is that it is global.

Unless we are going to regulate the traffic that comes into this

country, which has massive free`speech implications, all we can

do is look at the past that are based here. `` parts. And while

somebody has been accused of something scurrilous Romilly, on the

other hand if you have committed a crime the public has the right to

know that you committed that crime. That should not be removed. What

about the idea 20 years ago that he did something silly as a teenager?

It depends on what it is. There is a danger on facilitating a system in

which it is in the power of people with expensive lawyers to change the

public record. That is ominous. Let us go on to the Guardian. This is

getting interesting. UKIP. This is the face of the future, apparently.

A rising star accuses the party of racism. We have a special event with

Nigel Farage and a lot of ethnic minorities behind him. Firstly, I

doubt it is a coincidence when she is choosing to go. The fact that she

is going in the run`up to EU elections, there that in mind. She

has been a member of the party when she was 18. She was formerly very

keen on it. She thought she was believing in EU's ideals. She now

says of late the UKIP party has been attracting the racist vote. She says

that they have been spreading a message of us and them. It is an

important story. She is right. She is right because UKIP has obviously

made a calculation as to how best to spread anti` EU politics and they

have decided to do so by being anti` aggression. UKIP used to not talk

about immigration. `` anti`immigration. It was about

sovereign powers. They have really made a conscious effort to harness

the anti`immigration vote. It is working. It is ugly and I find it

frightening. Good on her for speaking out against it. What about

all that stuff last week. There were a number of black and Indian people

standing kind Nigel Farage when he made it clear that his party is not

racist. He is going to stand by it. One would have thought that the

minorities in the party do not think it is racist. They were a lot of

them around him. The mainstream media has been a little bit guilty

of homing in on the peccadilloes and misdemeanours of UKIP candidates. It

is not hard. That is compared to those of Tory, labour and Liberal

candidates. To a degree. This is damaging for the party. You have got

a young lady who is going to create a lot of attention. It is a very

powerful message. Then we have the story that UKIP MEPs elected are

going to have to donate 10% to their salary to the party. I was not aware

of that. It is not a terribly shocking state of affairs. Parties

thrived when they are elected to the European Parliament. You have UKIP

candidates are rotated at the fact that they do not get to keep all

their money. The Times is calling it a scandal. If there is an element of

coercion going on, what the paper suggests is that candidates have not

to donate cash are being threatened with being barred from standing

again. That sounds fairly scandalous. Going back to the point

that if you're perhaps the press have been targeting UKIP a bit more

than other parties. `` you feel. UKIP is this new force that

potentially will be picking up speed. I think that is fair. The

European elections, it is a long way to the general elections. The media

will give each party a thorough examination. It is partly because

UKIP is the new kid on the block. It is not a coincidence. They are not

joining the Green party. There is something in the rhetoric of this

party which appeals to them. They have not in the past been well

served by a mainstream political party. I keep coming back to this

point, but UKIP needs to ask why racist like it so much. `` racists.

It has been doing well. There is clearly a constituency that likes

the message. The message is everything. The message is in every

direction at once. They claim to be a party that represents the poor

while they will strip away every measure of support to Britain's most

disadvantaged. They claim to be 100 different things at once. They claim

to be a grassroots party, yet they are backing establishment. I also

feel discomfort at UKIP always stressing immigration, reticular

lead the posters that have come out recently. `` particularly. I think a

lot of the public wants the debate but what I hope is that UKIP don't

blow it by completely discrediting themselves to the detriment of all

of us having a decent debate about European Union membership. We will

and on this one. England, England, Scotland. The Giants a football

around this table `` of. Officially, the Home Office says

that England will not win the World Cup. They have to build into their

models how they think the national team will do particularly in big

competitions as it does affect consumer spending behaviour. In

trying to ascertain the implications of keeping the pubs open later

during the World Cup have had to examine the probability of England

getting beyond the early stages which is only 54%. It's really are a

winning side many times `` Italy, and Uruguay... Only the first two go

through. We could be being unpatriotic. For us to get beyond

the quarterfinals, it is only down to 11%. We are only a quarterfinal

nation. Speaking as a late to this discussion, one of the things that I

love the most about my adopted nation of England is the gleeful,

dare I say childlike optimism as it relates to the English football

team. The phones are ringing off the hook! Best of luck to you. You will

need it. Stay with us now, much more coming up at the top of the hour but

for now it is Sportsday. Hello and welcome to Sportsday. I'm

Olly Foster. Here's what's coming up tonight. Vacancy at the Lane...Tim

Sherwood has been sacked at Spurs. The