22/05/2014 The Papers

will stop all that, plus the Gulf from Wentworth and disappointment

for one of the favourites on the Tom Watt was. `` golf. `` pommel horse.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

bringing us tomorrow. With me are Tim Montgomerie of the Times and the

journalist and blogger Susie Boniface, better known as the Fleet

Street Fox. Tomorrow's front pages, we will

start with the Independent, which has a picture of UKIP leader Nigel

Farage voting today. It leads on news of a new malaria vaccine that

could save hundreds of thousands of people. The Daily Express is

focusing on the latest official figures, which it says shows that

Britain is buckling under the way for a fresh migration from Europe.

The Daily Star reports on David Moyes being questioned over a brawl

in a Lancashire wine bar. The Telegraph is saying the Government

has identified vast parts of southern England as targets for

fracking and claims that ministers will allow it to happen under homes

without owners permission. The Guardian has a terrific picture of

lightning striking the shard and also says a powerful Westminster

committee is demanding the breakneck expansion of private colleges should

be investigated. Seven Paul McCartney's health is concerning the

Mirror. They say he is battling a serious viral infection in Tokyo.

The Daily Mail covers the row on alleged remarks by Prince Charles

comparing Vladimir Putin to the Nazis. Daily Telegraph, several

papers hinting at elections but unable to say a great deal. This is

all about what Kenneth Clarke has been writing in the Telegraph? The

Tory's most Europe friendly member, we are trying to work out if he's

been sent out to do this or he's a doughnut of his own back. He is

basically saying we can't leave the EU because it would hurt business.

The member states and the rules and regulations have been swept away,

it's now much easier and simpler for business and we can't possibly

leave. The opposite of what Nigel Farage would say and what an awful

lot of anti`EU Tories would say. I can't help but think that this is

probably the worst... If you were a Conservative leader wanting to bring

people on your side, having perhaps had what may be a relatively

bruising election night with UKIP taking some votes away from you, you

would not really want Ken to bumble along in his Hush Puppies and say,

it's all right, chaps, we are going to get cheap cigars! He probably

thought he was doing the best. I completely agree, this is a red rag

to a bowl. If you wanted to ask UKIP voters, and you will probably get a

lot of them when you count the votes, who with a least liked in a

Conservative Party, who they most objected to in terms of where the

Conservative Party is standing on it would be their pro`European

credentials, as well as their pro`immigration credentials. Sending

out the most pro`Europe Tory out, I don't know who came up with this

strategy, but it's not really the right strategy. That might be why he

is indeed freelancing. You used the phrase is sending out, which would

imply there is a party machine in operation here. You both suspect

perhaps not? If the party machine wanted to convince members and core

voters that the Tories were the right people to stick with on Europe

for the future, they would be talking about the referendum they

promised in 2017, there would be talking about David Cameron, the

things he said. They would not be doing is. This is not the Tory

machine. If it is, it is backfiring horribly. The Tory machine should be

locking Ken Clarke in a cupboard somewhere, keeping him quiet for 12

months. And throwing away the key! If you are watching and part of the

Tory machine, get in touch. The Daily Express says migration is out

of control, outrage as another 2001000 are allowed in from the EU.

That is up from the previous year. There are different statistics

within the story. Take us through the coverage. Completely related to

what we have been talking about. This is the ONS? UKIP started as a

party which was about taking Britain out of the European Union, but the

issue that moves votes for them is the immigration issue, rightly or

wrongly, that is what UKIP voters are worried about. 78% of British

people say they want less of aggression. David Cameron made a big

promise to reduce Nat Dileep Magennis immigration `` reduce net

immigration. Early in the Parliament they seem to be making progress

towards that. Although as a country, we can control immigration from

outside of the EU, which Theresa May has been relatively successful

at... That has fallen? It has fallen. But we can't control the

numbers coming from Europe. The average voter looks at this pledge

of things it hasn't been met. Nigel Farage, you can almost hear him

licking his lips. This is the issue that keeps UKIP vote is rising. You

are right, the UKIP spin doctor on Twitter was desperate for people to

report this, saying, why is it not top of the news? It would get their

core vote out to vote. But it is not quite as dramatic as the Express is

making out. Overall, the net migration figure is stable. It is

not doing anything. We have more foreign students from non`EU

countries that are dropping us. A third of them that used to be here a

few years ago are not coming in the same numbers. The people that are

coming in are more likely, there is a 7% increase in those registering

to work. And they do pay taxes, so that is beneficial to us. If you are

worried about pressures on your local schools or house prices, and

by 9% in the last year, it is still 200,000 extra people, net, coming

into the UK. I completely agree with what Suzy was saying. A lot of

people bring enormous benefits, they could our health service going. They

also add pressure to public services. Whether we think it is

good or not, David Cameron made a promise he would reduce this and

he's not been able to keep that. One part of migration he cannot

influence is the EU part. If you are a racist, this is actually good news

for you. People of a different skin colour, there are fewer of them

around, people coming from the EU, our own race, there is more of them.

If you are really racist and horrible, you should be happy about

this. I'm not quite sure where you are going with this. If you look at

the opinion polls, ethnic minorities in Britain object to the scale of

immigration as well. Not because people are prejudiced, it is because

of the pressure on public resources. That is why people worry about

immigration. Let's go back to the Telegraph, another story which

caught your eyes. This is their lead, the great oil rush, vast areas

of the south hold billions of arrows. Go ahead for firms to frack

and homes. This has all manner of imprecations? It sounds very

dramatic. This coalition has a slight track record of announcing

what sounds like a boggling plan, and it is just a plan. And then it

finally comes there into law and it has been watered down to what they

originally wanted anyway, but people are now less upset about it because

it is not the first boggling thing they suggested. When they are saying

there is loads of shale gas in the south, between Wiltshire and Kent,

they have been a big survey. We are talking about areas of outstanding

natural beauty, the South Downs National Park. You are also talking

about areas that are core Tory vote. The map here would be very blue.

Very, very blue. I can't imagine in the next 12 months David Cameron is

going to sign of going, yeah, sort it... Salt it... Well, not that...

People have said worse on the BBC! It would only happen after an

collection. Everybody will get outraged and then they will say, we

are only going to do it in the desolate Northwest, then people will

not be so upset. Big coincidence that it has been

released until the polling stations are closed. What are you suggesting?

On a weekend where there is so much other news about and people are not

thinking about it. The idea of fracking and homes... That is

debatable, you hear that argument, dishonest and it is how far under

people's homes? I'm a great ecclesiastical or fracking. One of

the biggest problems we face in the country is energy bills. If that was

Ed Miliband's great success at his party conference, to promise to

freeze energy bills, the only way you're going to keep them down is to

exploit new forms of fuel. Shale gas has been a huge success for America.

It is creating jobs, wealth, keeping energy prices down. Actually, people

have exaggerated idea of what a fracking station is like. It is not

a huge installation. People will still object to it, but it will be

good for the economy, good for jobs and mean that old`age pensioners who

are worrying about heating their houses, their bills in the long`term

will fall. That's good social justice wise it is good economic. I

don't disagreement I think the controversy is the allegations that

it can cause minor earthquakes, that's the main controversy. If you

suggest doing it under people's homes, that controversy is going to

cause a huge fuss and be more of a controversy than perhaps it needs to

be. I don't think this plan is going to ever be performed in the way

they've suggested at the moment. Can I leave that controversy there? I

would like to take us to the Independent front page. This in

theory is a good news story. New vaccine can transform malaria. It

could save, they say, hundreds of thousands of lives. This seems to be

one of those unambiguous good news stories. This month is a month when

Britain became one of the only nations in the world to spend 0. 7%

of our national income on fighting global poverty. It hasn't been

transport transported `` trumpeted because the Conservatives are

worried about the UKIP thing. It is not a popular policy. What we spend

on fighting hunger and poverty in the world is something that we

should be proud of. One of the things we are good at is fighting

malaria and vaccinating children. This is about tracking children who

don't get malaria and investigating why they don't. It's a great news

story. Something that British aid and British investment we can

rightly as a nation be proud of. You don't even have to say this is

children in Africa, it doesn't affect us. Mosquitoes are on the

increase, especially in cities because of water buts and stagnant

water. There's a possibility you could have a new malaria outbreak

and, if, so we'll be grateful they have done this. A lot of technology

on blood protein, there are ramifications for. This you can get

one person's national immunity and transplant that into somebody else

to protect them from disease. That the would help all of us. We only

have a minute left to glance at the Daily Mail. Now the Kremlin hurls

abuse at Charles. Should we worry about what the Kremlin is saying

about the heir to the throne? No, because Vladimir Putin doesn't give

a toss what Prince Charles says about him. Prince Charles knew what

he was doing when he said what he said within hearing of journalists.

Do you think he did? Yes, these are royal photocalls. They provide

members of the public to the press to get quotes out of him. He's had

everything scrutinised for 65 years and knew that was going to be

reported. Due agree? I don't know whether he knew this was going to be

released but this is one of the wisers things his said. He wasn't

speak for Nigel Farage, who admired Vladimir Putin. But I think most

people worry a great deal about Vladimir Putin's expansionism, where

he wants to take Russian tanks next. I think on this occasion our heir to

the throb is speaking `` heir to the throne is speaking for lot of us.

Thank you for looking at tomorrow's front pages. Stay with us on BBC

News. At 11 o'clock we'll speak to our political correspondents across

England as counting gets under way for the local elections. But next it

is sometime for Sportsday. `` time for Sportsday.

Hello and welcome to Sportsday, I'm Mike Bushell. The headlines tonight:

England's cricketers taste victory in the first one day international

of the summer against Sri Lanka. Police are investigating