No need to wait to see what's in the papers - tune in for a lively and informed conversation about the next day's headlines. Presented by Clive Myrie.
Browse content similar to 24/06/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
have all the latest from the world cop. `` World Cup.
Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers
With me is Paul Johnson, Deputy Editor of the Guardian
and Neil Midgley, Media Commentator at Forbes.com.
Phone hacking is the main story in the Financial Times, which shows
Andy Coulson, the former News of the World editor, who's been found
And the Telegraph shows Andy Coulson's predecessor,
Rebekah Brooks, leaving the Old Bailey with her husband,
Charlie. They were both acquitted of charges relating to phone hacking.
Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks are both pictured
The Guardian front page is also devoted to the phone hacking trial.
And The Times devotes its front page to the not guilty
The Sun does the same. Let's begin. We are going to start with the
Guardian. It calls Andy Coulson eight criminal. This is an
extraordinary story. There is a lot more to come. The front pages are
really diverted. `` very divergent. We have had eight John boasts chart.
Six have pleaded guilty. This is extraordinarily. 12 more trials are
scheduled. One or two of the People's seem to be thinking that
this is he. But it is not. `` the papers. We have a lot of stories
Europe, saying that report murder is to be questioned. He is to be
questioned under caution. If we think that is the end of it we are
completely mistaken. The Guardian has been running with the story. The
suggestion that Andy Coulson, the criminal who had David Tanner and's
confidence, there were no questions of him being went to the hacking at
the time. What was the problem back then? It is the way that the
politicians have reacted to this today. The Guardian is showing
admirable restraint. It is not being triumphant. It has been the story
all along. Ed Miliband is saying that David Cameron's government is
tainted. He employed Andy Coulson. That was in 2007. David Cameron was
in opposition. Andy Coulson was a criminal. The police, it was the
job, not David Cameron's. They is the question of what that David
Cameron now. What should he have asked. But I do not think there is
any suggestion that anybody has any evidence... Any more than he was a
former editor of the News of the world. He was the one bad apple. It
was the crime from News International. Most politicians were
silent about this. The one bad apple defence ran for some time. We know
that there were the few bad apples. But as the Times points out, Rebekah
Brooks is not guilty. So was in the shop for cooking up this conspiracy?
Senior management had no idea. It is very interesting the week that the
newspapers are covering this. The Guardian is talking about Andy
Coulson being guilty, but The Times is talking about Rebekah Brooks
being not guilty. This is being presented as effectively for the
Rupert Murdoch empire. You will remember when Rupert Murdoch came to
London, he was asked about his priority. He says this one, pointing
at Rebekah Brooks. She was a confidant of the Empire. She has
been cleaned up. `` cleared. It was even said that there might be
prosecutions in the United States. News International, is it going to
happen? We are not sure about this. Your reporters today have been
saying that the media corporate charters. Imagine if this was the
bank. If criminality cannot be proven at a certain level, there is
an attitude at the top for teaching responsibility. Look at what we have
seen at the BBC. It is not just if you people being found guilty, what
we have here... A court has found that Rebekah Brooks did not know.
But in terms of corporate responsibility it may be different.
The legal test that I read this was not the controlling mind of the
corporation, don't they know what was going on? Report Murdoch, James
Murdoch, what the new? `` Rupert Murdoch. The Daily Telegraph, is the
suggestion that this figure is thought it was the mode of nonsense?
That could be the case. One or two of the newspapers appear to be
calling it into question. But if the police have phoned criminality than
it needs to be posted. `` prostitute. `` pursued. Andy Coulson
is in the story here. Of course, all this, it brings into question the
regulation of the press and we also know that thousands of victims have
your phone 's hacked. One extra that I spoke to says it calls into
question the Leveson Inquiry. The Julie seems to have agreed that it
was the number of bad apples. `` jury. The Leveson Inquiry, was it a
waste of space? I would not go that far. Part of the motivation was to
say that the press should have been regulated. The field to our nails
this. `` They failed to unearth this. An eight`month trial? The
biggest statutory regulator of all is the police. The field. `` They
failed. But the PCC dead as well. They had to rely on them being a
complaint by somebody mentioned the story. That is going to be a new
system of press regulation. The victims of the hacking will say it
is not legally change from the old system. They are not playing with
the statutorily underpinning. But things have changed. The new body
for publications that sign up, the Daily Telegraph already committed,
though will be proactive Poles. `` powers. Has the Guardian signed up?
No, but the only reason to sign up would be if it was convinced that it
had credibility to the public. What about the people who think it should
be independent of the editors? If it is not God credibility, it is seen
as independent, I do not know what the future is. We will reserve
position on that. We also have a self`regulatory system within our
own organisation. We are going to move on. The hacking story is on the
front of every newspaper. Inside page of the Financial Times. We have
discussed this. Has this damaged David Cameron in a more long`term
we? `` long term way? I doubt it. I think the public queue about this
when the Milly Dowler revelation came out but I am not so sure that
they do any more. They have probably formed the opinion of David Cameron
and his relationship with Andy Coulson before this verdict. When
you have got the general election in less than a year, the question about
somebody's judgement in hiding a spin doctor seven`year cycle is
probably not going to be top of the list. Ed Miliband said, they went
after News International. Is this a good day for him? I do not know.
Though will be more questions about this, for the Cabinet Secretary as
well as David Cameron. The vetting procedure just seemed to be a Nord.
`` nod. In the future I think they will be very careful about what they
want from the spin doctors. More thought on that in the future. It
has been good having you here. All of the fallout from the hacking
trial. It is time for the sport. Hello and welcome to Sportsday. I'm
Thomas Niblock. Good evening. England are on the way home from the
World Cup after a scoreless draw with Costa Rica, but the big talking
point from Brazil surrounds Liverpool?s Luis Suarez. Italy
defender Georgio Chiellini has claimed he was bitten by Suarez as
both Uruguay and Italy played for a