25/06/2014 The Papers

the home crowd plenty to celebrate as he eased through to the next

round, all of that and more on sports day coming up after the

papers. Hello and welcome to our look

ahead to what the the papers With me is political commentator

Lance Price and Reuters business Tomorrow's front pages, then,

starting with... The Telegraph carries

a recommendation from the government's chief obesity adviser,

who says parents should ban fruit juice and fizzy drinks from the

dining table, and serve only water. The Metro front page shows

a dreary welcome home More fallout from

the hacking trial in The Guardian. It says the Prime Minister's

judgement is in question after he commented on the case before the

jury had reached all its verdicts. And The Express says sunshine is the

key to lowering your blood pressure. The Financial Times says

David Cameron is now alone in his opposition to Jean`Claude Juncker

becoming the president of the European Commission after the Prime

Minister's allies abandoned him. The Mail also carries that food

advice. We will start with the Guardian. They say that the Prime

Minister ignored warnings. Commenting before the Julie has

vanished as though deletions... On the face of it, it does not look

like it has even been acknowledged. I have never, across a Jew diligence

process will be asked if you engaged in any criminal activity and then

you make a decision on to hire or not. `` due diligence. But he does

not do these chicks are born? It requires civil servants and it was

required that receive some money Andy Coulson would not be subject to

these? It was an extraordinary decision. I went through the highest

level of security checks. That is clearly an issue. It raises

questions about David Cameron's judgement and also the system. The

headline of the Guardian is about the decision of the Prime Minister

to comment before the Julie had finished its dollar deletions. ``

jury had finished its deliberations. The Guardian have done more coverage

of the story than any other newspaper. The reporter who started

the story has gone into an enormous detail but he accepts that the

evidence was not good enough to convert Rebekah Brooks. He makes the

interesting point that the trial was about something else. The power of

the media, the Prime Minister, and in terms of the collateral damage,

people in high places whose careers are on the line, David Cameron seems

to be suffering even more than Rupert Murdoch. You mention the

reasons, although there was enough strength in the case. The Crown

Prosecution Service say that it was brought to explore a culture of

invading privacy. The tactics in which people used... It is the

concept, we are going to investigate this new media. As the Julie found,

the evidence was not that strong against a number of people.

state about as much as it costs to state about as much as it costs to

investigate financial crimes. It was quite unusual. It is very difficult

to look at it and see that politically, the political factors

were not an issue. It would have been very difficult for the Crown

Prosecution Service not to have investigated. The Milly Dowler

development, her disappearance was being investigated and her mobile

phone was subject to phone hacking. I think the public revulsion at that

meant that the trial had to happen. Some people thought it was going to

cost too much but I do not know if that should be a justification. It

all adds up to evidence that it was an extraordinarily trial. The point

was made by a lawyer that if the invasion of privacy needs to be

investigated, as a criminal case the correct way to do it? It does seem

to be muddying the water was. `` waters. Wheel does this leave

stronger press regulation? If the criminal case is able to deal...

That is the issue. It was the full regulatory system. The was evidence,

it was posted. We now have convictions. This is already being

used by people who are not in favour of increased press regulation as

evidence that Bill is not the need for those kind of measures. What do

you want to see? I think everybody, everybody was horrified to see some

of the tactics used. The way in which it appeared to be absolutely

normal. Phone hacking, other wanted methods. `` wicked. The Financial

Times, Jean`Claude Juncker. David Cameron is not a supporter. It is

looking increasingly likely that Jean`Claude Juncker is going to get

the top job at the European Commission. It looks all but

certain. David Cameron thought he could take on the pro`European

majority and face them down. He has field. `` failed. It is going to be

seen as a humiliation. Beck questions about his judgement. The

feudal sceptics, he is standing his ground although it may not do him

much good? It may box and into a corner. He has clearly got the

message from his political partners, externally, President Obama and the

business community. The issue is that he has bolstered himself. But

at what cost? It looks like he has lost. David Cameron is warning them

will be consequences if Jean`Claude Juncker gets the job. Angela

Merkel? I am sure that they will try to take the heat out of the

argument. They do not want the rest of the European Union, they do not

want the United Kingdom to leave. Not simply to save his fees but they

do believe and reform. They do not want to see the European Union

changing but some actually do. That is pressure on Jean`Claude Juncker

to become reform. Let's move on. The fan goes wild! World Cup flops

arrived home. Their misery complete. The game was seen by 5.8 million

viewers. We would not time that down! `` turn that down! What is

going to happen to the England team at the moment? Roy Hodgson try to

bring some useful players into the team? I was discussing at the while

ago. My ignorance was demonstrated. We are not exactly sure what this

was the only support. I am amazed at how the numbers are calculated. As

the weather? What is it? It makes an answer. Do you have a CD? Video

games? How any of the fans who you thought that they could do real I do

not know. But it will not stop people talking about it and spending

a fortune? The Metro says at least we have Andy Murray! Spectators at

Wimbledon, watching Andy Murray. Here is the cartoon. And Louise

flies? `` Luis Suarez? Top about repeat offenders. The evidence seems

to be pretty obvious. Has shoulder bore testimony. Hopefully it will

desist. Thank you very much for joining us. That is from ours. That

is all we have time for because of the World Cup. Stay with us.

sports day. Fifa way up the charges against Luis