31/10/2016 The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

With me are broadcaster Edward Adoo and journalist James Rampton.

A warm welcome to you both. Let's show you what we have so far in the

front pages. The Financial Times reports that

Mark Carney is staying as Governor of the Bank of England until 2019

to steer Britain's central bank He is also on the Telegraph's front

page, as is Donald Trump. Donald Trump,

who the paper says making moves by the FBI over Hillary Clinton's

emails. It's a story that's dominating

the i front page too. It says Hillary Clinton is 'waging

war' on the FBI. The Metro leads with the moment

a lorry driver, distracted by his mobile phone, killed four

people in a multiple car pile up. The Guardian says Russia

poses an increasing threat to UK security -

according to the Head It's the first newspaper interview

with a serving MI5 chief. And the Mail reports that

a taskforce, set up to capture wealthy tax evaders,

has had only one successful The times focuses on the UK's

readiness to strike back at any foreign cyber threat and also

features a shot of Mark Carney, who appears to be winking at the camera

on his way out of Downing Street. Maybe he knew something.

CHUCKLES He knew how long he was going to

stay in the job, and according to be Telegraph, Carney to quit straight

after Brexit, one way of looking at it.

They have gone with this catchy headline and everyone expected him

to stay in the job until 2021. He will be in the job until 2019. It is

the whole issue of Brexit, will he stay? Will he go? He's going to go

after Brexit. I think he's done well in terms of what he's all about.

He's kept everyone in a positive frame in terms of the economy. But

there was speculation that he would quit, and a lot of people have kind

of been criticising that, in fact he should have done his full term.

There has been a lot of speculation, well, a lot of bickering as to why

he is deciding to leave. In terms of Brexit, he is going to stay through.

James, some of the Brexiteers don't like him and thought he was a

prophet of doom during the referendum. He did and he got

slated, by Jacob Rees-Mogg and Iain Duncan-Smith laying into him today.

After the referendum he was the only person who seemed to have his head

screwed on and announced they would be quantitative easing, which saved

the economy. George Osborne was nowhere to be seen, Boris Johnson

preparing to play cricket, Michael Gove preparing to stab various

people in the back. When you expect somebody to give you some form of

positivity, and there was no one around, and Mark Carney save the

day. I hope these Tory Brexiteers have not chased him out because he

is a stabilising influence in this turbulent time.

We need sensible people like that to steady the ship. He will stick

around for awhile longer. DfT have that on their front page also.

Carney extends term to steer Bank of England Brexit negotiations will

stop -- DfT. The Telegraph mentioned he is going

to quit. Here they are saying he will stay during the negotiations.

In actual fact, what you're saying, James, is there needs to be someone

in place who will sure things don't go wrong. There needs to be a

leader. Michael Gove was looking for a job!

LAUGHTER Let's not go there. He will not be

your friend tomorrow! He wasn't my friend today!

Gof for governor would have a certain ring about it. Let's go to

the other side of the pond and the American election is getting

interesting. So many twists and turns. This is the gift that keeps

on giving. It's incredible, just when you think it is a done deal,

Hillary Clinton 12 points egghead, this extraordinary revelation that

James Coney sent this letter saying he is minded to reopen the

investigation and the Democrats, as the eye newspaper said, they are

waiting warn him. And then they said James Coney might be sitting on some

information linking Trump to the Russians and they are calling on him

to resign. Even Josh Earnest refused to endorse James Coney today. The

White House is supposed to be neutral. President Obama appointed

him. Massive pressure on James Coney. What he has done is

unprecedented. According to the FT Trump saying, Clinton if she was

elected President, would face a criminal trial as a sitting

President. Sitting trial, you've got to think for the electorate, what is

going on here, this constant bickering with Trump and with these

e-mails, do they actually want to know what is going on, that is the

question that should be asked. Trump is using this as his weapon of mass

destruction and no pun intended. What was shocking is James Comey

hadn't even seen any of the e-mails when he sent the letter so in my

eyes he is making a clearly political jester doing that. He is a

Republican and to do it in 11 days before the General Election is

absolutely unprecedented and that is why he has caused such a storm of

criticism. One reporter said he thought if he didn't do it it would

be leaked by some people at the FBI. We have a nice cartoon in the

Telegraph as ever. It is great. So slow, and now we have started

getting all of Hillary Clinton's e-mails. It reminds me in the 90s,

if you have dial up, if you remember, the old-fashioned way of

connecting to the Internet. Imagine everyone just waiting for the

e-mails to come through. That he was what he was trying to put across.

Only 350,000, they cannot take that long to download! Donald Trump did

say, what does she do all day? She must be constantly writing e-mails.

Can you imagine Trump waking up at three o'clock in the morning

thinking I want those e-mails. He is tweeting all the time, he is a fine

one to talk! Let's move on to the eye which has not very prominently

but the Orgreave inquiry is not happening. What is your thought on

that, James? I agree with Andy Burnham, he said it was an

establishment stitch up and it seems to me the campaigners are claiming

that Amber Rudd appeared to promise them in inquiry, just a question of

what form of inquiry and now, apparently, or allegedly, she has

backed out of that pledge. Quite understandably in my eyes, the

campaigners are furious about it. The campaigners said that it was

alleged that Amber Rudd said in what context? And that is what they are

arguing about. They didn't get what they wanted. Andy Burnham earlier

today said it was an establishment stitch up. We were just talking

about Hillsborough, and it happened with the same police force. In

actual fact, would this not going ahead, it saves the force from

further backlash, but for the campaigners and families who wanted

some answers out of this, will they get the answers? Labour is

championing this and want to get some answers from this but many will

question why Amber Rudd has decided to make this decision and will

anything ever come out of it? Lord Tebbit explicitly said it would be

used with a stick to beat Mrs Thatcher's government. I will just

leave that hanging there. Let's look at the Metro, they have one of the

most awful stories I have read for a long time about the lorry driver. He

was on his phone. So many people use their mobiles while driving, but

what catastrophic consequences, to kill four people. I saw the footage

earlier, Thames Valley Police have worked with the family to show

footage of what actually happened and it is scary. You could be

driving along on any motorway and you could be driving ahead, could be

a lorry driver, he was probably shuffling trying to find a track on

his playlist and he went straight head on, I'm not sure how fast he

was going. The judge said it was like he had his eyes closed,

effectively. Absolutely, and he said he turned his lorry into a lethal

weapon and the mother of one of the poor children who died said I would

urge you to make a personal promise not to use a mobile phone while

driving. That will not happen, when I'm driving I see people still using

mobile phones. I think the Government needs to get involved.

Ibiza should be a stronger penalty. Or a campaign -- maybe there should

be. People might think that could have been my children. They should

show the footage of what happened. When I saw that it was heartbreaking

to see the impact of what took place.

The Daily Mail have got just one super-rich tax cheat nailed in seven

years. 2012, this person was prosecuted in

2012. They have 380 people working as part of this team and apparently

it is racking up a bill of ?15 million. You've got to think, we

mentioned earlier, the people being investigated, there must have

knowledgeable lawyers, they must know how to kind of get themselves

out of it. But for the average man or woman working on the street,

cleaners, bus drivers, who will see this article and thinking, hang on a

minute, why am I working? 380 people employed to get one conviction in

all of these years. If any other organisation was so inefficient it

would be closed. It is shocking, particularly when small businesses

are being targeted, maybe two or three people working all the hours

that God sends to earn money and people with the money to pay for

very flash lawyers are getting off apparently scot-free. The question

that is to be answered is why isn't HMRC doing more? That annual bill,

?50 million, a lot could be done with that money. We're living in

towns of austerity, Brexit, the pound is in a peculiar position. ?50

million could go a long way. They could pay Gareth Bale for a week!

LAUGHTER The last paper is the Guardian, they

have an exclusive interview with the head of MI5. In the whole days --

the old days he would never have given an interview. We have seen the

Bond film where he or she is known as Mand now we know what he looks

like he gave an unexpected speech at the Royal Society of Arts as you say

it's the first time a serving head has given an interview in 107 years.

There are lots of interesting revelations. He says there is a

growing threat to the UK of cyber attacks from Russia. He said we are

perhaps being distracted by so-called IS, and while we are

looking over their Russia is coming over here, blocking our computers,

messing with our businesses. We sort of knew that, didn't we? Is it a

revelation? He says it is much more prevalent than we thought. He says

Russia seems to define itself as against the West and it is

manifesting that in messing up the West's business. And apparently

meddling in the American election. The timing of this piece with what

is going on in our lapel as well. One interesting fact that he

mentioned, which was good, he said his aim was to have a gender balance

and recruit more people from ethnic minority backgrounds. Within MI5?

Which is a good thing. Why is it taking so long quiz --?. The threat

of what is happening with Russia, that needs to be investigated. I

suppose we deal need to know about it.

Read the Guardian and you can find out more about what the head of MI5

thinks.. Open the e-mail with Russian letters because it's bound

to be a trap. It is still in my inbox! Thank you James and Edward.

Thank you for joining us. That is it from The Papers, all of the front

pages are online on the BBC website.