Browse content similar to 20/04/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
deliberate a targeted. TRANSLATION: The two officers they | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
were wounded and other nearby at officers returned fire, and the | :00:00. | :00:16. | |
attacker was killed. Hello and welcome to a look ahead at the | :00:17. | :00:21. | |
papers for tomorrow. Some have managed to get the Paris shootings | :00:22. | :00:31. | |
on to their front pages. Thank you for stay with us to do a second | :00:32. | :00:35. | |
review of the papers the night will stop will be looking at the various | :00:36. | :00:39. | |
lies coming in from the news agencies as we are talking. Writers | :00:40. | :00:42. | |
are in particular dropping lines every few minutes about the attack | :00:43. | :00:43. | |
in Paris. Let's start with Daily Telegraph | :00:44. | :00:50. | |
which has the Paris attack quoting the French Interior Ministry | :00:51. | :00:53. | |
saying police had been deliberately The paper also reports | :00:54. | :00:56. | |
from Brussels, saying that EU that the UK retains European laws | :00:57. | :01:02. | |
regarding the rights of EU citizens living here after Brexit, | :01:03. | :01:06. | |
as part of any deal. "New Terrorist Attack | :01:07. | :01:13. | |
in Paris" is the headline The paper also reports | :01:14. | :01:16. | |
on government's plans to abandon the planned rise in probate charges | :01:17. | :01:19. | |
payable on the death of a loved one. The Metro reports on a major | :01:20. | :01:25. | |
study which suggests artificially sweetened drinks may | :01:26. | :01:27. | |
increase the likelihood of developing dementia | :01:28. | :01:30. | |
or suffering from stroke. Let me with a couple of the papers | :01:31. | :01:39. | |
that are reporting on the Paris shooting tonight. The Daily Mail is | :01:40. | :01:45. | |
of them. One policeman dad, too critical, it says, after a | :01:46. | :01:49. | |
government goes on a rampage on the Champs-Elysees is just before the | :01:50. | :01:52. | |
election. -- Champs-Elysees just before. All too often, we have had | :01:53. | :02:01. | |
to report seems like this in Paris in the past two years, haven't we? | :02:02. | :02:06. | |
Yes. These freezers will be very familiar to a lot of people. -- | :02:07. | :02:17. | |
phrases. There is in use in having perspective and saying these are | :02:18. | :02:20. | |
small-scale attacks which may not have huge amounts of co-ordination | :02:21. | :02:27. | |
and made not ring cities to a halt. This also shows that once again, | :02:28. | :02:34. | |
people in the emergency services, police in particular, are out on the | :02:35. | :02:38. | |
streets every time they go to work on a potentially putting their lives | :02:39. | :02:44. | |
at risk? Yes. That Italy when you have here a police officer killed | :02:45. | :02:48. | |
again doing his duty. And you have this iconic landscape in the | :02:49. | :03:00. | |
background. You have the Arc de Triomphe, and the Big Ben clock | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
tower in London. These big tourist sites are the target of attacks. | :03:06. | :03:11. | |
Just a couple of lines from Reuters. The Paris prosecutors are saying | :03:12. | :03:13. | |
that they have identified the gunmen, but they are still assessing | :03:14. | :03:19. | |
if he had compasses or not. -- gunman. There was a report that an | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
arrest warrant was issued because they thought that somebody else | :03:26. | :03:32. | |
could be out there to speak to. But they said that police raids are | :03:33. | :03:35. | |
ongoing. They are looking at addresses in the follow-up is part | :03:36. | :03:38. | |
of their investigation. But the timing of this, of cause, is also | :03:39. | :03:43. | |
significant. Just three days before the first round of the French | :03:44. | :03:48. | |
presidential election. We have sunny similar in this country. Last July, | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
the referendum, the EU referendum, Wenger -- when Jo Cox was murdered. | :03:54. | :04:05. | |
I don't get really affected in the end. I think people accepted that | :04:06. | :04:10. | |
that was a horrific, murderous attack by a deranged individual. And | :04:11. | :04:16. | |
hopefully, the people of France will put this aside and not allow it to | :04:17. | :04:24. | |
affect their elections. The Daily Telegraph also has this on their | :04:25. | :04:28. | |
front page. A gunman with a Kalashnikov was known to security | :04:29. | :04:33. | |
services, they say. This will be the information will be looking for in | :04:34. | :04:37. | |
the next few days. Who this person was, and my connection they might | :04:38. | :04:41. | |
have with other groups. Somebody who might be on a watchlist. I think is | :04:42. | :04:48. | |
important to say that just because somebody was known to security | :04:49. | :04:51. | |
services does not mean that there was a failing. People can also be | :04:52. | :05:01. | |
known without being suspicious. Yes, a lot more information to come. A | :05:02. | :05:07. | |
lot of leaders will say it is depressingly regular. And very | :05:08. | :05:12. | |
different tiers and levels of extremism among some of the | :05:13. | :05:18. | |
suspects. I guess the security services had to categorise them into | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
how dangerous they think they are and how much information they have. | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
Manpower is not limitless. They need to decide who is the priority. I was | :05:28. | :05:31. | |
reading that there are potentially thousands, if not tens of thousands | :05:32. | :05:36. | |
of, people on watch lists, potentially. How can even a well | :05:37. | :05:41. | |
resourced security service keep track of all of them? There is also | :05:42. | :05:47. | |
the suggestion that either the accomplice or the gunmen had come | :05:48. | :05:51. | |
from Belgian, which is Brussels, and that is regarded as somewhat of a | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
centre for terrorist activity. If that is the case, we are looking at | :05:57. | :06:01. | |
is open border situation in continental Europe, where people can | :06:02. | :06:05. | |
move freely from one country to the next, and that brings the downside, | :06:06. | :06:10. | |
in terms of moving guns across the continent, which, luckily, we are | :06:11. | :06:14. | |
not in the Schengen area and we do have the channel between us and | :06:15. | :06:18. | |
France, which makes us a little more guarded from gun crime. Let's move | :06:19. | :06:26. | |
on and look at the Times. A story about the EU. Britain told to keep | :06:27. | :06:30. | |
EU laws on workers and security, says Brussels. | :06:31. | :06:37. | |
Plus the jurisdiction from the European court of justice. This will | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
be a surprise to many. You have a deal to protect the rights of EU | :06:43. | :06:46. | |
nationals in the UK and British nationals elsewhere in the EU. What | :06:47. | :06:51. | |
is now being suggested is that would involve the European court still | :06:52. | :06:56. | |
having power over what the British government does to the European | :06:57. | :07:00. | |
citizens in the UK. Even if they give them the right, which seems | :07:01. | :07:03. | |
easy to do, you can stay here for the rest of your lives, we have to | :07:04. | :07:07. | |
accept court rulings with regard to benefits, child benefit with Jo for | :07:08. | :07:15. | |
example to those overseas -- child benefit for example. You would need | :07:16. | :07:19. | |
a new body to preside over issues like this, a country like us not in | :07:20. | :07:24. | |
the EU and a country that will? If I'm being too simple then please | :07:25. | :07:28. | |
tell me, but if Britain leaves the European Union, we are out of the | :07:29. | :07:32. | |
jurisdiction of the European Union so I can't see how the courts of the | :07:33. | :07:37. | |
European Union can affect people who live here, be them Europeans or | :07:38. | :07:41. | |
British or EU nationals or not. Surely that is if they retain the | :07:42. | :07:47. | |
rights are stowed upon them by being a citizen of the EU because they're | :07:48. | :07:51. | |
not a British scissors, they haven't relinquished those rights, there has | :07:52. | :07:56. | |
to be a supranational body that can preside -- British citizen. If it's | :07:57. | :08:03. | |
affecting the way Britain operates as an independent, sovereign nation, | :08:04. | :08:07. | |
then it becomes a bit more complicated. The fact we are having | :08:08. | :08:12. | |
this conversation shows how difficult the whole business of | :08:13. | :08:15. | |
Brexit is. Untangling ourselves from 40 years of joint regulation and how | :08:16. | :08:24. | |
it happens is very conjugated. This is a proposal from Michel Barnier, | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
and has the backing of the European Parliament. -- complicated. We were | :08:29. | :08:34. | |
told it was only Germany standing in the way of a deal between British | :08:35. | :08:39. | |
nationals in the EU and EU nationals here, it seems that they're asked | :08:40. | :08:44. | |
him the minds on this. It is square one and a difficult one to move on | :08:45. | :08:58. | |
from -- there are demands. If we outside the framework there has to | :08:59. | :09:01. | |
be a court that can adjudicate between us and the EU. It is | :09:02. | :09:07. | |
plausible you could have European citizens living in Britain who were | :09:08. | :09:11. | |
subject to British courts and British interpretations of what it | :09:12. | :09:14. | |
means to protect your rights of residence, family life and those | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
kind of things. If they are as good as you got when we were part of the | :09:19. | :09:25. | |
EU. It doesn't seem like this is... They're saying it's a red line, it | :09:26. | :09:29. | |
doesn't seem the only way of going about things. If they're worried | :09:30. | :09:35. | |
about their rights to claim benefits after a post-Brexit, we would write | :09:36. | :09:43. | |
that into law and it would be agreed and our courts would uphold that. | :09:44. | :09:47. | |
There would be no need for the ECJ to make a judgement. This is very | :09:48. | :09:53. | |
complicated. I don't remember any of it in the referendum campaign! I | :09:54. | :09:56. | |
wonder why. Doesn't make for a snappy headline! | :09:57. | :10:00. | |
Let's look at the Guardian, something else we thought couldn't | :10:01. | :10:04. | |
be un-pick but perhaps it can be. Not too late to avert Brexit, says | :10:05. | :10:10. | |
EU leader. The president of the European Parliament, an Italian, who | :10:11. | :10:16. | |
is generously saying Theresa May is wrong, you can turn back if you | :10:17. | :10:20. | |
change your mind, we will keep you in. You don't have to leave. | :10:21. | :10:27. | |
Exactly. I think a lot of people are actually looking at European law as | :10:28. | :10:31. | |
it is written, they would say there is so much ambiguity, enough of a | :10:32. | :10:35. | |
grey area that if Britain decides it wants to stay in the EU, it's a | :10:36. | :10:40. | |
political will question. The people who believe in the European project | :10:41. | :10:44. | |
see this as damaging that Britain has left and of course they would | :10:45. | :10:49. | |
want to keep Britain on board in those circumstances. I think he is | :10:50. | :10:52. | |
saying something many have thought for a long time. Can we turn the | :10:53. | :10:56. | |
clock back to July when we were having the referendum? I remember | :10:57. | :11:01. | |
the levers saying, look, if we vote to Leave, it will send a shock to | :11:02. | :11:08. | |
the European Union and they will up the offer to stay and then we can | :11:09. | :11:13. | |
have a second referendum. They would have thought they were losing at | :11:14. | :11:17. | |
that stage and they were going to hold out to those who weren't sure | :11:18. | :11:23. | |
that if we hold a referendum we will get a better offer from Europe and | :11:24. | :11:28. | |
the Leave campaign said don't be ridiculous, leave means leave. Now | :11:29. | :11:33. | |
we have voted to leave, the European Union are saying... It would make it | :11:34. | :11:37. | |
easier for them if we did? They aren't saying we are going to get a | :11:38. | :11:43. | |
better deal, cutting budget contributions for example, they're | :11:44. | :11:47. | |
saying it's not too late to stay together. They aren't offering any | :11:48. | :11:51. | |
reform? To be fair we haven't asked for anything in particular... | :11:52. | :11:58. | |
Theresa May is so keen to get out. What would be required for this is a | :11:59. | :12:03. | |
Lib Dem victory in the general election, it doesn't look likely in | :12:04. | :12:06. | |
the next two years Theresa May will turn around and stay -- say let's | :12:07. | :12:15. | |
stay in. Article 50 is such a small clause, it has to be open to | :12:16. | :12:22. | |
interpretation. I was always told it wasn't reversible. Even when you | :12:23. | :12:26. | |
change your mind you are out, that is a vicious thing to say so he has | :12:27. | :12:30. | |
said the logical more generous thing. Looking at the Telegraph and | :12:31. | :12:34. | |
another EU related story, Theresa May commits to cutting migration to | :12:35. | :12:40. | |
the tens of thousands. Some people think it is impossible to get it | :12:41. | :12:46. | |
under 100,000. The reason it was impossible and why David Cameron | :12:47. | :12:49. | |
promised that in 2010 was because we were in the EU. There's more | :12:50. | :12:54. | |
immigration from non-EU countries. They can control that. But they | :12:55. | :13:00. | |
haven't. Exactly. What they are saying is when we leave the EU the | :13:01. | :13:04. | |
Prime Minister will do more to crack down on immigration and get it into | :13:05. | :13:09. | |
the tens of thousands. Let's see if she can do it. She should have wiped | :13:10. | :13:14. | |
the slate clean, she wants a new mandate, she could have had a | :13:15. | :13:18. | |
different mandate. Lots of people are urging her to do that, why make | :13:19. | :13:22. | |
a promise that has been proved to be hard to keep. You could fudge this | :13:23. | :13:27. | |
promise, you could take out student numbers, those who contribute to the | :13:28. | :13:32. | |
economy, you could give it an impossibly long time frame. There is | :13:33. | :13:35. | |
some wiggle room, she said to wants to cut it to sustainable levels but | :13:36. | :13:41. | |
it doesn't say to 2019. It is hard to hold her to account on this. She | :13:42. | :13:46. | |
can say the line of below 100,000 until the end of the next parliament | :13:47. | :13:52. | |
if she wants. It was below 100,000, net migration, in the 1990s. It is | :13:53. | :13:58. | |
plausible there are a lot more EU member states at the moment who have | :13:59. | :14:02. | |
sent a lot of people here. What's curious about this is having voted | :14:03. | :14:06. | |
for Brexit, most people believe immigration will be certainly cut, | :14:07. | :14:13. | |
especially from East Europe. There's no great need for her to say this | :14:14. | :14:21. | |
but she has. They can't help but make pledges, but they are asked to | :14:22. | :14:26. | |
make them! Let's look at the Mail again, Theresa May taxes plan for | :14:27. | :14:32. | |
rise in death tax. This will be a sliding scale increase in fees when | :14:33. | :14:36. | |
people die, their wills and estates have to be disposed of. Is this a | :14:37. | :14:43. | |
casualty of the fact there isn't any parliamentary time between now and | :14:44. | :14:46. | |
June the eighth to see bills like this through the house? Yes, the | :14:47. | :14:51. | |
government want to introduce higher charges without having to go through | :14:52. | :14:55. | |
Parliament. Liz Truss, the Justice Minister, has the power to increase | :14:56. | :15:02. | |
your death tax in some cases. A parliamentary committee took a look | :15:03. | :15:05. | |
and said actually this isn't really a fee because it bears no relation | :15:06. | :15:10. | |
to the cost of dying and having an estate process, so actually it's a | :15:11. | :15:14. | |
tax and you can't do that without Parliamentary emission. Business | :15:15. | :15:18. | |
ends in Parliament next week before the election so they don't have the | :15:19. | :15:22. | |
necessary resources to put this through -- permission. They could | :15:23. | :15:28. | |
bring this back in the next session. Will it be in the manifesto one | :15:29. | :15:34. | |
asked is? It is the second slight U-turn from the budget -- one asks. | :15:35. | :15:41. | |
We had the NICs, swiftly ditched, and now this, a good excuse to do | :15:42. | :15:46. | |
it. It takes it off the agenda for the election, unless of course she | :15:47. | :15:52. | |
decides to put it in the manifesto. It was going to be quite a good | :15:53. | :15:56. | |
earner for the Treasury? ?1.5 billion a year, taxing rich, dead | :15:57. | :16:01. | |
people, it doesn't seem like voters are going to punish you. Good | :16:02. | :16:07. | |
arguments in favour of this moneymaking scheme. Philip Hammond | :16:08. | :16:10. | |
needs the money. Let's finish with the Metro, I think it is the Express | :16:11. | :16:17. | |
looking at this, diet cola linked to dementia and strokes. If you drink a | :16:18. | :16:23. | |
diet drink every day it more or less triples your risk. A lot of people | :16:24. | :16:28. | |
are drinking these thinking they are being healthy. I know friends who | :16:29. | :16:34. | |
won't drink the fall flat Coke, the normal Coca-Cola, but they buy Diet | :16:35. | :16:38. | |
Coke and it has been the norm recently -- full fat. What you are | :16:39. | :16:43. | |
giving up in the sugar you are replacing with chemicals which | :16:44. | :16:46. | |
sweeten the drink for you. Artificial sweeteners. This story | :16:47. | :16:51. | |
doesn't seem to say, we can only see the front page, it doesn't say where | :16:52. | :16:57. | |
but it says drinking diet drinks can increase the links by three times | :16:58. | :17:04. | |
for dementia and strokes. It's all about moderation. If you're drinking | :17:05. | :17:08. | |
a lot of these everyday then you must be doing yourself some harm, so | :17:09. | :17:12. | |
cut down. I'm sticking to the water but I want to see the full study, | :17:13. | :17:17. | |
I'm not convinced entirely from the front page. There will be something | :17:18. | :17:22. | |
that contradicts it. Go back to alcohol! Let me finish by telling | :17:23. | :17:27. | |
you something else I have read from Reuters from the French prosecutor, | :17:28. | :17:30. | |
he is saying they know the identity of the attacker involved in the | :17:31. | :17:35. | |
shootings this evening in Paris. The identity is known, it has been | :17:36. | :17:39. | |
checked, but he said he won't be giving the name until we have | :17:40. | :17:43. | |
determined whether any more accomplices are around. These are | :17:44. | :17:47. | |
life pictures looking down the Champs Elysee towards the Arc de | :17:48. | :17:51. | |
Triomphe. We are still investigating and raids are ongoing, he said. | :17:52. | :17:56. | |
Investigators want to know whether or not he had accomplices. The | :17:57. | :18:01. | |
wounded police officers' lives are no longer in danger, said the | :18:02. | :18:06. | |
Interior Ministry, no word yet about the passerby also injured. That's it | :18:07. | :18:11. | |
for the papers tonight. Thank you to Henry and Dave for staying for our | :18:12. | :18:15. | |
second review this evening. Thank you very much. | :18:16. | :18:17. |