19/05/2016 This Week

Tonight on this Week's Game of Thrones:

But say what you wish, there will always be battles

His Lordship, John Bird, tells us why the haves

There are no great victories for the poor to be seen in the flames.

And those who seek to help, give the wrong medicine.

Pomp and heraldry greeted the return of Queen Elizabeth II

to Westminster, but were all her subjects pleased?

Lord of the North, Andrew Rawnsley, is not impressed.

Lord Cameron of House Tory tried to distract his party

But by the old gods and the new, nothing could stop the blue

We resurrect top reptilian conspiracy theorist,

What am I doing on mainstream television? Did I come through the

wrong door? Who will be the one to lead us

through this endless night? Evenin' all, welcome

to This Week, the week And we can tell by the look

on your face that you're A king-size Whopper of a speech

with extra fries and a full-fat There are the usual Moaning Minnies

who say the referendum is proving a huge distraction from

the business of government. But just look at what Her Maj read

out yesterday and you'll see why Call-Me-Dave sacrificed a low-flying

career in public relations And why the Labour Party,

even led by a political Titan like Jezza, is facing a life-sapping

generation in opposition. You wanted a Small Charitable

Donations Bill, clarifying the rules concerning how charities

connected with community You called for a Cultural Property

Bill, to make dealing in cultural property illegally exported

from occupied territories And forget a third

runway at Heathrow - who needs that when

we're going to build You can hear them quaking

in Cape Canaveral as I speak. Who cares if Zac Goldsmith threatens

to resign and trigger This is progressive,

visionary, centrist Proof - if proof were needed -

that the Lib Dems Provided, of course,

you're not worried about the slowing of the economy, the condition

of the poor, the high budget deficit I don't think any of that rated

a mention. Speaking of a lack of ambition,

I'm joined on the sofa tonight by two Westminster duds we found

in the This Week toilets. Think of them as the suspect device

and the suspect package I speak, of course, of #fourpercent

Liz "Miserables" Kendall and #sadmanonatrain Michael

"Choo Choo" Portillo. Your moment of the week? I want to

pick up where you left off because the Queens speech was the moment of

the week. In 2015, a majority Conservative government was elected

for the first time since 1992. 23 years, we have waited with bated

breath for this. Now it comes forward with its Queens speech,

after 23 years of careful thought about what they would like to do

with office and power. And the answer is, there is nothing they

want to do with office or power. The Government is in total paralysis

because the only thing that matters to them now is saving the Prime

Minister's career, which is dependent only on winning the

referendum for the remainder campaign. And that majority that he

secured last year is all for nothing. The Government has nothing

to do, nothing to say and thinks nothing. Very well. He is not on the

fence. I am going to cheer everybody up. My moment of the week was

Monday's parade celebrating Leicester City's football club

winning the Premier League. It was amazing. I just thought I would rub

it in a little bit more. I think as Brits we are used to falling at the

last hurdle and something going wrong. But this time things did not

go wrong and I am very proud we worked so hard as a team. We didn't

give up, and despite all the odds, we won. For me, the taste of victory

was very sweet indeed. It was an amazing day for the city and I think

a lot of people in the country were happy and pleased. So a big night

for rugby union in Leicester. Oh, it was the round ball, was it? We will

have a kick about later. Now, in a week where Her Maj

outlined 21 new government Bills, what will any of them do to help

Britain's disadvantaged? Why is there still so much poverty

in this, the fifth largest economy in the world,

with its massive welfare state Here's Big Issue founder Lord John

Bird with his take of the week. It wasn't so long ago that

David Cameron, in a bid to leave some kind of legacy,

called for an all-out The right prescription but maybe

the wrong medicine. Because many of those who deliver

policies for the poor do so as if the poor are some

strange other species. We cannot assault poverty if those

suffering under it are seen We need to treat the poor as though

they have potential and the ability Unfortunately, the well-intentioned

hold them back. Government is often doing the wrong

thing, spending too much money on keeping people in poverty,

rather than getting them out. At times it seems like a conspiracy

of dunces, where they haven't joined It's those at the bottom of society

who are feeling the consequences. We fail people at school,

and often they end up in prison, or in A, as a result of self harm

or drink and drugs. And this week we've had

the Queens Speech outlining 21 bills, none of which will

help to dismantle poverty. It's a terrible tragedy,

but the thing is, unless you fare well on welfare, you can't

say farewell to welfare. Most importantly, we need to knock

on the head the abysmal failure to bring intelligence,

theirs or ours, to the problem. Because we have another problem

coming down the track, the young, middle-class people

lumbered with student debts and unable to buy houses

and raise their families. Each government says it's

going to end poverty, but now is the time

to actually get on with it. From Vauxhall City Farm

to our own little This Week pigsty, John, if you had been writing the

Queen's Speech and there was one thing you could do about poverty,

what would you have put into that speech? I would have demanded of the

poor and those people who are stuck in poverty, the postponement of,

what is the word, you know that word, postponement of... The benefit

cap? No, no. I would say that the poor need to learn what you have

learned and you have learned and I have learned, which is the fact that

you postpone the idea of gratification. And the unfortunate

thing is that all these people in the Labour Party and the

Conservative Party and everybody else, and what they are doing is

they are almost conspiring in keeping the poor poor. Because they

don't face up to the idea that living in poverty is a bit of a

killer. But I am sure by definition if you are poor you are pretty much

having to postpone gratification. Oui sorry. If you are poor, you do

not have much to gratify yourself in the first place. Is it the poor who

are to blame because they are poor? Who is talking about blame? We are

talking about a mechanism for getting out of poverty and all this

stuff about who to blame and who not to blame... The really important

thing is, do we allow the poor to carry on being poor, or do we allow

them to express themselves and move out of poverty? The most important

thing about the postponement of gratification is that Mr Portillo

and Liz Kendall, at some stage your family postpone gratification and

saved for the future. And they never do that because nobody ever allows

the poor to be like us. They look upon the poor as though the poor are

another species. Lives, what is the position of poverty in this country?

We were looking through some of the figures. -- Liz. Almost one third of

the population fell into a technical definition of poverty in the first

three years that David Cameron became Prime Minister but also those

who fall into poverty have a greater chance of seeing their fortune

improve than anywhere else in Europe. Surprising to me, persistent

poverty is the third lowest in Europe. What do you see as the

picture? It is clear that poverty can happen to many people. We tend

to discuss it as if it happens to other people but many people can

fall in and out of poverty. The biggest change has been the increase

in the number of working poor, and the endemic low pay in this country

is one of the underlying causes of poverty. Even though they are

working, they get trapped. Trapped on low wages. Even before the

financial crisis people were not seeing the benefit of growth in

their pay packet. You asked about one thing that would make a

difference in the Queen's Speech. I think the very early years of life,

when kids in my constituency start school, aged three and a half, but

develop between 15 and 20 months behind where they should be, they

play catch up for the rest of their lives. I would like to see

investment in the early years to halt kids start school ready to

learn, instead of an inheritance tax cut for the rich which entrenches

wealth and privilege. You would need more than the savings of the

inheritance tax cut. This government, and Gordon Brown before,

as Prime Minister and as Chancellor, always thought that work was the way

out of poverty. For many people it is. If work only takes you into the

working poor and you need tax credits to top it up, and if you

earn extra bed tax credits go and it is not worth your while, then we

have a working poor problem. What you said, if I understood correctly,

was that you thought aid for working people here is low by comparison

with other countries, which it certainly is not. The one thing the

Government has announced and has started to do is to increase the

minimum wage, which they call a living wage. The minimum wage will

be increased substantially. My prediction is that the main effect

will be to attract vast numbers of immigrants, because our pay is not

low by comparison with other countries. If you take the European

Union, within which we have free movement, Romanians, Bulgarians,

Spaniards for that matter are paid less than British people. But if you

think the problem is the amount working people are paid, that is

precisely what the Government has tackled in a way that no previous

government has set out to do. Have previous welfare reforms been a

mistake? People who should not have been put on social security are then

driven off at some stage when their lives have been destroyed by Social

Security. What happens with Social Security is that it really destroys

lives. I am not just talking about facts and figures but members of my

own family who have been caught in this terrible world, where you give

people Social Security, which you think is a good idea because you

don't want them back in the 1930s on the streets. But the real thing is

that it destroys their chance of ever moving and becoming a Michael

Portillo or whatever. But poverty was much worse when we

didn't have Social Security. I was born in abject poverty before the

days, before the welfare state, but the point is, it isn't so much

comparing it, it's about the fact that what happens when you say to a

person, you don't have to look after yourself. Somebody else will, with

the state or whether it's a religion or somebody else, and that really

does destroy the chances of getting out of poverty. The real problem is

that most of the people on the left and the liberal ascendancy really

don't like the idea of social mobility. They don't like the fact

that there is a lot of people who aspire to get out of poverty,

because the Polly Toynbees and the Wyn Joness and all these people,

what they really want is they want people to stay where they are,

because they are better with the poor than with people who get in and

join their cast. What supports John's point of view is that the

welfare budget has gone up and up every year, faster than most

European countries, and yet there are still plenty of people saying

that poverty is worse than ever. But that isn't true. More and more

people are caught in poverty. Whether it is true or not, it must

suggest that spending more money isn't the solution. Polly Toynbee

isn't here to defend herself. Over 60 years, the love -- the welfare

state, it started before the Second World War, but it would be took off

in the late 40s, so we have got over 60 years of it, 70 years. There is a

consensus that we need a welfare state, but as it has developed as

they been an element in which the welfare state, rather than solving

poverty, traps people in poverty? Without doubt, it does track people

in poverty, but I don't recognise everything you are saying, John. I

see my constituents, single parents who want to go back to work, maybe

get some training, maybe go to university, they can't keep the

benefits they pay the bills, but they want to better themselves and

get on but the system isn't flexible enough. We talk about welfare as if

it is all for working people. The vast bulk of it goes to older

people. I think we must take the two too often, and it is working people

who have borne the brunt of the cuts. -- we mistake the two. We need

to see a rebalancing of that situation. We must end there. Are

you going to join the House of Lords? I am not, because that is all

about today and I am about tomorrow. I am there to dismantle poverty. It

already tomorrow. Now, it's late - SNP

love triangle late - But don't let your urge

for no-strings independence with a tartan jihadist send

you to bed, because waiting Britain's leading conspiracy

theorist, author David Icke is here to reveal the dark

truth about This Week. And if you believe we're

a cunning plot to deceive On the Twit-Te-Woo, the Fleecebook,

SnapNumpty, the Massager and Gordon Brown's Scottish Web

Sphere... Now, with speculation

mounting as to the identity of the next James Bond,

a bookmaker was forced to suspend betting this week

after a substantial amount was placed on the actor

Tom Hiddleston. Exactly the same thing

happened here on This Week, when Diane Abbott left the show

and a huge wager was Michael, I hope you've not spent

all your winnings yet. Here's Rawnsley, Andrew Rawnsley,

licensed to thrill, with his political

round-up of the week. Just the usual, trying

to save the world from crazed megalomaniacs and their devilish

schemes to achieve And can you ask Q to have a look

in his cupboard of gadgets? I need some tranquilliser gas

cunningly disguised Q, Rawnsley wants more toys

to play with, again. David Cameron has refused to retract

what he said about your He says they were stupid,

they were divisive Number one, I'm not stupid, OK,

I can tell you that right now. In terms of divisive,

I don't think I'm divisive. I am a unifier, unlike our

President now. When I made the statement six months

ago, and there was a clamour only by the politicians, millions

of people were calling in saying, Donald Trump, the Man

With The Golden Rug. Ah, Miss Green, I barely recognised

you with your clothes on. Usual formula, then,

cheesy one-liners, miraculous Yes, this film does contain some

Boris Johnson. This discussion is bedevilled

by all sorts of artificial media twit storms and hysteria

of one kind or another. There is a very good argument

against the lack of Over the last 2000 years,

people have made repeated attempts The EU is a very different project

but it is profoundly anti-democratic and that's why you should

vote Leave on June 23rd. Hold on a minute, Boris,

you can't complain when people It was you who brought the Nazi

dictator into the debate I don't really understand what Boris

is up to, frankly. I know him, I like him,

he makes me laugh. And yet yesterday, about Hitler,

I find that deeply disturbing. I think the strain of the campaign

is beginning to tell on him. The Tory civil war on Europe is now

more vicious than the blade in Rosa Kleb's shoe,

or the teeth on Jaws. Getting it under control would be

beyond Her Majesty's top agent, The Prime Minister tried

to distract his party by despatching the Queen down to Parliament to read

out a legislative Northern powerhouse,

Anti-Extremism Bill, surveillance legislation,

prison reform. That cocktail of already familiar

ingredients left a few shaken We will scrutinise carefully

proposals to give prison It seems the policies of this

Government have been to give greater That is, the consequences

of overcrowding prisons and cutting one third of dedicated

prison officer positions. We welcome the proposals

to give greater time for education and reform

and reduce reoffending rates. I may be losing, but you know

diamonds are forever. But don't last quite as long

as a speech by the Labour leader. David Cameron responded

by suggesting that his rival's I have to say, Mr Speaker,

I think there is more chance of the Labour Party calling it a day

when he completes his And, Mr Speaker, I have been

doing my researches, too. And it may come sooner

than people think. He recently placed an advert

for a job in his office and it said, "Fixed term contract for the period

only that Jeremy Corbyn is the leader of the Labour Party,

or until the 31st of December 2016, Tempting fate a bit

there, Mr Cameron. If the Tory leader loses

the referendum, he will be the one You do know that some women

think all you 00 agents I am very sensitive

to that, Miss Green. I have been on my gender awareness

training. If you think the 00s

are sexist dinosaurs, what about the henchmen of Ukip

number one, Nigel Farage? Did you catch Neil Hamilton

insulting female Welsh nationalists? These two ladies have just made

themselves political And what a gruesome prospect

that must be. Hmm, I wouldn't exactly

describe him as "coalitious". I don't suppose there's much danger

of the Green Party bidding for world domination

in the foreseeable future. This week, Natalie Bennett,

their leader, announced I went back to the proposals I put

forward when I stood I said I wanted to grow the party,

make us a truly national party, to win our place

in the national debates. And I thought, I've

achieved those things. Do you know what, Miranda,

she has me converted. It's time to consider my carbon

footprint, the exotic locations, Do you fancy a glass

of carrot juice Special thanks to the wonderful team

at Les Ambassadeurs Club in Mayfair. And here to cash in her chips,

This Week's very own femme fatale, And the man many people are calling

"The New Nicola Sturgeon" - future SNP leader and possible

First Minister of Scotland, Michael, as we sit here tonight, how

would you categorise the standing of Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne in the

parliamentary Conservative Party? Well, there was an MP today who was

lamenting the divisive nature of the campaign as it's been conducted by

number ten, and I think that is the crucial point. Andrew Rawnsley a

moment ago was saying that Prime Minister will be in peril if he

loses the referendum. I think he is in peril if he wins it. He has

announced he isn't going to run for the general election. He is a very

divisive leader. Some people would say, since we are not going to fight

the next election with him, why would we wait for three years to

change the leader? At the moment, he has the upper hand, he is the Prime

Minister and he can bully people, but I think it is a short term

policy and it potentially has its comeuppance. I don't know what the

numbers are in the Parliamentary party but I think it is a reasonable

bet that about half the party are Leave rather than Remain, and that

is a lot of people to offend in one go. Because this referendum debate

has been kind of dominated by Tory civil war, that is where the

dynamics of the argument have overwhelmingly taken place, is this

referendum grabbing the country as a whole yet? I don't think so. I don't

hear people talking about the referendum, but I did do Question

Time a few weeks ago, your warm up act, and it was interesting because

the driver who took me there from the station told me that one of the

things that was going to be invoked for Brexit was the imposition of

strict bananas. -- going to make him vote. I said, you are journalistic

gold. I haven't met anybody who still believes that! You don't think

it is grabbing the nation yet? I don't get a sense that people are

engaged by it. I think they are scumed by it. -- scunnered by the

vacuous level of the debate. I think it has got very nasty. I noticed the

Prime Minister saying he wouldn't debate with Boris because he didn't

want it to turn into a Conservative psychodrama. They are trying to

avoid blue on blue. That may be right, but he did call the

referendum. Exactly. You could say that about the Germans, but they did

start it. And I mean by this, the Prime Minister started it by calling

the referendum. Absolutely, but also he has been trying to replay the

general election, safety first strategy, fear of something. Just

like the election. And an economic mood across the world, quite bleak

at the moment. Why don't they call it how it is on the kind of things

that Boris is saying? I listened to that excruciating interview with

Chris Grayling yesterday morning when he was asked if he found it

distasteful that Boris had made this comparison with Hitler and the

Nazis. Instead of saying, yes, it was really off-putting, next, and

move on, he had this curious verbal dance with John Humphreys. I think

that puts voters off. You ought to try interviewing him... I don't

agree that people are not thinking about it, having spent the last four

or five months canvassing, not just for Police and Crime Commissioners,

elections locally, but also asking the EU question. People know it is

coming and they have to start thinking about it. My concern about

this whole blue on blue row is not just bad this issue is bigger, far

bigger than who end up leading the Tory party, it is that, unless a

strong Labour case is heard by people, we will not get the Labour

vote out, which is crucial for Remain. I think there is a good hope

you will not get the Labour vote out. Can I have a go at the Boris

point? The problem with the European Union

is that it is an ideology, and they can be dangerous unless they are

democratically restrained. There is no democratic process in the

European Union and no plan for a democratic process. That is why this

ideology is dangerous. Ask the Greek people, who by their millions have

been put out of work, the Spanish who have been put out of work in

their millions because the ideology dictated that all the countries had

to be in the euro. The greatest example I saw in the United Kingdom

was Michael Heseltine, who insisted on interest rates going from 10% up

to 15% in September 1992, because the ideology dictated that we should

remain in the exchange rate mechanism. It did not matter that

mortgages would rise by 50% that day, because the eye geology

dictated it. Where do the Nazis come in? I have not introduced them.

Ideology unrestrained by democracy is dangerous. That is coherent and

fair. It is not my take but it is coherent and fair. What every

reasonable Person objects to is the theatrical and distasteful use of

the Nazis. I do not want another TV programme dominated by it. I have

done too many and I am bored with it. It seems to me that if you are

right that the referendum is not grabbing the public mood in the way

the Scottish referendum did, in an unprecedented way, the degree of the

public participating, that is good news for the Leeds side, because the

lower the turnout, the more likely they are to win. Leave. Absolutely.

Some of the strange things they have started to say, they have started to

raise this phantom second referendum. You wonder whether they

are cynically trying to depress the turnout, because the fewer people

that vote, the greater their chances. I don't think they are that

clever. The one thing that is clear in the Leave campaign is that it

stumbles from pillar to post. The remaining campaign is like a

juggernaut, bringing in the IMF. What will the turnout be? Very low,

I think. Old people who are anti-European will be motivated. Not

anti-European, but anti-European Union. Fun anti-European, too. They

will be motivated to turnout. The vote in Scotland will be higher than

in the rest of the UK. That is good for your side. And for democracy in

general. I think the turnout might be healthy in the end. I think

safety first will win. No idea, but we are busting a gut to get young

people registered to vote. Lots of students will have finished exams

and be going home and that is a big focus for the Remain campaign. I

don't think anybody has any idea which is why the opinion polls mean

nothing. If you don't know the turnout, you don't know anything. I

think it will be less than the general election, which was 66%. The

75 referendum was lower than the two elections in 74. Anything below 60

helps Leave, big-time. Anything above 60 helps Remain. Thank you.

And whatever happened to Biggie, Tupac and Diane Abbott -

or the far left's eulogising of Venezuela's socialist revolution?

The world is full of mystery, intrigue and strange goings-on.

For example, in last year's Labour leadership election,

4.5% of Labour members and supporters voted for Liz Kendall

- an unexplained phenomenon that still puzzles many of us

And that's why we're putting conspiracy theories

Is BoGo paranoid, or was the Prime Minister plotting to keep

It is the biggest stitch-up since the Bayeux tapestry.

A leaked letter this week suggests Call-Me-Dave was planning

his campaign in secret, while publicly saying

he was prepared to leave the EU, during his renegotiation.

In a debate already dominated by hyperbole, both sides are now

accusing each other of peddling conspiracy theories.

So was the Chancellor simply trying to discredit his rivals by claiming

The next thing we know, the Leave camp will be accusing us

of faking the moon landings, kidnapping Shergar and

covering up the existence of the Loch Ness Monster.

JFK, the moon landings, Area 51 - some conspiracy theories

are certainly out there, but who says a cover-up has

Calls are now mounting for an enquiry into the 1984 Battle

of Orgreave, while the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy

were certainly conspired against by the powers that be.

He's been called a lot more than a conspiracy

You know, 2000 years ago, had a guy called Jesus sat

here and said these same things, you would still be laughing.

Though sold-out stadium lectures don't lie.

David Icke knows how to grab your attention.

But even if our lives are affected by invisible forces,

the question remains, is the word "conspiracy"

Would you describe yourself as a conspiracy theorist? Well, I look at

what officialdom tells us is happening and I check it out. And if

you can back that up with information, it is not a theory. And

there are situations where you think, this could be this or that,

that could be happening. That is a theory. But much of it is backed up

by hard factual information. Interestingly, when you look at the

dictionary definition of the very word "Conspiracy", we are drowning

in them. One, the action of plotting or conspiring. That is happening all

the time. Give me an example of a conspiracy. Ironically, we had

George Osborne this week trying to ridicule conspiracies involving the

EU by likening them to believing in the Loch Ness Monster. And in the

same week, we have the Daily Mail exposing the Prime Minister for

conspiring, in effect, with big business, to frighten the public

into staying in the EU while publicly, to Parliament as well,

saying that he would come out if the negotiations, renegotiations did not

work. That is a conspiracy. Is it? Is it not politicians just doing the

time-honoured thing of being less than honest? Well, if you are

telling the public that you will have the option of coming out if you

do not renegotiate with the EU the way you want, and you then don't do

that, and at the same time you are telling the public in Parliament

that, you are working with big business behind-the-scenes already

to frighten the public into staying in. Even though the renegotiation is

not finished. That is a conspiracy to mislead the public. What other

conspiracies should we worry about? Well, what we are looking at all the

time our conspiracy after conspiracy coming to light, while the idea and

the very word conspiracy is demonised. For instance, we have a

situation with this Chilcot Inquiry where we are going to see, indeed

the information has a ready come out, that the Prime Minister of the

time, Tony Blair and George Bush and the administrations, lied to us to

justify an invasion of Iraq. And that is a conspiracy that has cost

the lives of staggering numbers of people and created an ongoing

catastrophe that is still going on. And let's not forget this, the very

same people, not just the same agencies, the same people that told

us there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when they knew

there were not, those very same people gave us the official story of

9/11. So was 9/11 a conspiracy? Of course. Who was behind it? Well, in

the time we have here, it is very difficult, but there is a network

that works through government agencies, through organisations like

the CIA, etc, to push an agenda on the world which is unfolding by the

day. My books in the 1990s laid out what this agenda was, and those

books are now being read on the television news in changes in

society and laws coming in. This is the point. The mainstream media has

accepted that those characters, those same characters lied about

Iraq, but will not question in any way the same people's version of

9/11. They are journalists. It's their job. Do you still think the

royal family worship shifting lizards? Yes, I do. And you want us

to believe 9/11 is a conspiracy. Other not undermine it? No. I can

see that you might question 9/11 but if you think Buckingham Palace is

inhabited by lizards... It is not that simple. There is a whole big

back story before you get to what I am saying. If you deliver it in one

line, the world is run by lizards, you meet on one level, that crazy,

reflex action. But when you see the back story and the evidence to

support it, ancient and modern, you see that throwaway line in a

completely different context. Have you ever believed in a conspiracy

theory? No, I haven't. But I think David Aaronovitch is interesting on

this. He says that, paradoxically, we keep obsessing about conspiracies

because somehow it is actually reassuring to think that there is

some rate network of purpose, when in fact the world is chaotic and

random and terrible things happen. And we cannot get our heads round

it. As a journalist, I would love to believe in conspiracy theories

because they are better stories, but enormous everything I have

investigated, Kockott is a better explanation. People put a lot of

work into conspiracy theories, but I think they are intellectually lazy.

I think people just do not want to get their head around the way things

actually work. That said, firstly, a lot of people are gullible about

conspiracies. The police were gullible about the Downing Street

paedophile ring. On the other hand, there clearly was a conspiracy over

Hillsborough, and over 28 years people denied there was a conspiracy

but there was. My last book is 1000 pages. Have you read any of my

books? No. How do you know it is intellectually lazy? I wasn't

talking about you, I meant members of the public who immediately latch

onto a conspiracy as the most reasonable explanation of a simple

situation. How do we know you are not a conspiracy to make us believe

in conspiracies? People must believe what they like. It is simple. You

look at information and make a decision on what you think of it.

But if no one is investigating what governments and authorities are

saying with a view to whether it is true or not, then what chance have

people got to see information that they can then make a decision on?

All that they are getting is the mainstream repeat, repeat, repeat

version of everything. In my career, everything I know has been

investigated and we go by the facts. What are you up to these days? I

have a new book out and I am going on a world tour call over the world.

That shows how many people are looking at this.

But not for us, because it's Doncaster Power List night

at Lou Lou's, and we're off to dance the night away with the real

movers-and-shakers - and Ed Miliband.

But we leave you tonight with an exclusive.

Despite the fact that the Supreme Court has ruled today upholding

the injunction that prevents us naming a celebrity couple involved

in an illicit affair, we are prepared to challenge that

decision and reveal the identity of the three people involved.

We realise this might mean we go to jail, but viewers have a right

to know what these sleazy degenerates have been getting up

Nighty night, don't let the menage a trois bite.

# One, two, three Come fly with me

# One, two, three You, me and he

# Would you like to threesome with me?#

I think they'll take it this year. Yeah. Yeah.

I think we're in for a real cracker.

This could be the game of the season.